{"id": "adb867fe661fd963", "prompt": "I see that `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js` exists and seems related to the fetch adapter. Is the primary purpose of `composeSignals` to handle the cancellation of in-flight fetch requests using AbortController? \n\nSpecifically, if I pass a `CancelToken` to an axios request made with the fetch adapter, does `composeSignals` map that CancelToken to the underlying request's AbortSignal? I want to make sure I understand how the legacy cancellation API integrates with the modern fetch signal pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "adb867fe661fd963", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:d366a331db14", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c2fb477-1b8a-4778-b92a-8ca33496ddd1"}}
{"id": "a20ff51e042351aa", "prompt": "I need to bump the version number in package.json before we cut a release. Increment the patch version. Also, make sure the CHANGELOG has a placeholder for this version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a20ff51e042351aa", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:743235d82fc0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a1f6bcb0-7c7c-4180-a808-7e68309609ae"}}
{"id": "e88eeb7f62461f8f", "prompt": "find where the default timeout config is defined. I want to change the default for all instances.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any places in the code that override this default explicitly?"}, {"prompt": "Where is this default merged into a specific request config?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e88eeb7f62461f8f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:d82cb7470654", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f50fcec-9c77-4d81-a727-9f7c98d5e339"}}
{"id": "0af2bdc9b7f58460", "prompt": "Preciso que o `Http2Sessions` em `lib/helpers/Http2Sessions.js` seja atualizado para garantir que conexões idle sejam destruídas após um certo tempo de inatividade. Currently, we're leaking connections. Adicione um parâmetro `maxIdleMs` à configuração e atualize o `tests/unit/helpers/Http2Sessions.test.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0af2bdc9b7f58460", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:cee03808e488", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f42326bd-7b80-4aa7-9934-c90b80d433dc"}}
{"id": "fe75ea371d0275bb", "prompt": "I need to update `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` to be more robust. Currently, it does a lot of synchronous checks and direct calls to `combineURLs` and `isAbsoluteURL` without centralizing the logic.\n\nLook at the imports in `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` and `lib/core/Axios.js`. I want you to refactor the URL handling logic. Specifically, in `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js`, extract the base URL resolution logic into a small helper that sits alongside `combineURLs` or maybe inside `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` if it makes sense there, but keep the actual call in `dispatchRequest` clean.\n\n1. Check how `baseURL` and `url` are currently merged.\n2. Ensure that `isAbsoluteURL` is used correctly before calling `combineURLs`.\n3. Do not change the exported API of `dispatchRequest`.\n4. Make sure this doesn't break the browser tests in `tests/browser/baseURLResolution.browser.test.js`.\n\nJust show me the updated `dispatchRequest.js` and any changes to helpers if needed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fe75ea371d0275bb", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:097c1f58c617", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9fb9f9d1-c5c6-487a-9d85-a88af0cd315f"}}
{"id": "1a9aa47114592c50", "prompt": "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'length')\n    at AxiosURLSearchParams.forEach (/path/to/axios/lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:45:28)\n    at buildURL (/path/to/axios/lib/helpers/buildURL.js:12:17)\n\nI'm hitting this when I pass a null value to the params in an Axios instance.\n\n```javascript\ninstance.get('/search', { params: { query: null } });\n```\n\n`lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js` doesn't check if `this.map` is initialized or if the keys in the source object are valid before calling `forEach` on the internal array. Fix the `toURLEncodedForm` or the params serializer to handle null/undefined values gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1a9aa47114592c50", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:be0514f39bf5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11499489-7607-412f-b631-fa2bdc7f8890"}}
{"id": "43f3594036b54c1f", "prompt": "Explain how `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` works. I need to understand the priority order when merging user-provided config with defaults.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "43f3594036b54c1f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:791e44995b1a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99989bae-6e9d-45f7-a609-7ee52d39a29d"}}
{"id": "3c616c333a8ef8f4", "prompt": "I'm migrating from v0.21 to the latest version. What are the major breaking changes regarding adapter configuration?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c616c333a8ef8f4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:6e074a4dc2ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7a9d5b1-4ff7-409a-bf72-79c4af94c80a"}}
{"id": "14cbe8f3fc747ed5", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue with TypeScript types not being resolved correctly in my project after upgrading Axios. The error message says `Module 'axios' has no exported member 'AxiosResponse'`. According to the Axios TypeScript documentation, `AxiosResponse` should be exported. Can you check the latest Axios TypeScript definitions in the `index.d.ts` file to see if this export is present? Also, is there a specific version of the types package I should be using?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "14cbe8f3fc747ed5", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:045f306852cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bec9aad1-1fa9-4724-892d-59288b29bb64"}}
{"id": "fe2abfffecc99205", "prompt": "run a check on all dependencies to see if any are deprecated. if we have any, let me know so we can plan a replacement.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fe2abfffecc99205", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:889094572e11", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4a1362c-1b15-426d-b3ff-b1fd64ad7955"}}
{"id": "f30159703a2ddee2", "prompt": "Olá, estou tendo um problema com o `composeSignals` em `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js`. Quando passo um AbortController existente e uma nova opção de timeout, o sinal original às vezes é cancelado imediatamente, mesmo que o timeout ainda tenha tempo. Aqui está o stack trace:\n\nError: Timeout\n    at Timeout._onTimeout (node:internal/timers:465:21)\n\nPode verificar se a lógica de prioridade está correta? Acha que pode corrigir os testes em `tests/unit/helpers/composeSignals.test.js` também depois?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f30159703a2ddee2", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:cd31a0c0961c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6297b7ef-7b50-49e7-94ac-510b3e2b67e0"}}
{"id": "d0fcdb81bf01b9f9", "prompt": "I'm seeing this in the console:\n\n`TypeError: Failed to execute 'send' on 'XMLHttpRequest': The XMLHttpRequest implementation does not support the 'timeout' property.`\n\nLooking at `lib/adapters/xhr.js`, it seems like we're setting a timeout even when the environment might not support it properly. Can you check the MDN docs for XMLHttpRequest timeout compatibility across browsers mentioned in our docs? Also, is there a specific runtime check we should be adding before setting this property in the XHR adapter?\n\nfollow_ups\": [\"Can you add a runtime check in xhr.js to detect if the timeout property is supported before setting it?\", \"Update the comment in xhr.js to reference the specific browser versions that have this limitation.\"]}, {\"prompt\":", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you check the latest vitest docs to see if there's a better way to configure the globals property in vitest.config.js?"}, {"prompt": "Update the vitest configuration to use the recommended syntax from the latest documentation."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d0fcdb81bf01b9f9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:43f7d016b2ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f0af0f41-8b44-4365-ac8a-08e60e973f88"}}
{"id": "d3bf8b7676e824af", "prompt": "Como funciona a lógica de construção da URL dentro de `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js`? Quero entender como ele lida com diferentes protocolos.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3bf8b7676e824af", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:8de07ca42aa3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23500504-403d-4acd-8463-ce70a2cbfdbd"}}
{"id": "d5bb978cc4ab36f4", "prompt": "I'm trying to pin an exact version for a smoke test dependency but I can't see the current lockfile state. Run `npm ls --depth=0` so I can see what's actually installed vs what's in package.json.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5bb978cc4ab36f4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:f7d7c522f0b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39242bae-b814-4fb4-90c4-bc55ab69b197"}}
{"id": "2f931f472b18c308", "prompt": "I want to clean up the codebase before the release. Please handle these tasks:\n1. Refactor `lib/adapters/xhr.js` to improve the progress event dispatching logic, following the pattern used in recent fixes for `live loadend` dispatch.\n2. Update the type definitions in `index.d.ts` to better expose the response default marker type as requested in the recent `fix(types)` commit.\n3. Clean up any unused utility functions in `lib/utils.js` that aren't being imported by the core or adapters.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2f931f472b18c308", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:a89d36575495", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c66cf823-2e8c-47f0-ae19-b04b46b4d8cc"}}
{"id": "03866ef647390924", "prompt": "I've been messing around with `lib/core/Axios.js` to try and debug that interceptor issue. Can you stash my current changes so I have a clean working directory?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, forget the stash. Can you just revert my last commit? It broke the build."}, {"prompt": "Now restore my work from the stash I made earlier."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03866ef647390924", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:da21c05ae151", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "76575960-0b54-421c-a108-1fe6a1d5e47d"}}
{"id": "d934867928eaac8a", "prompt": "Delete the `examples/get/server.js` file, it's deprecated and we don't use it anymore.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d934867928eaac8a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:22044e31febc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "881b863d-1de1-4d82-87bc-60a14c5a9f7d"}}
{"id": "99aed3310cea23fb", "prompt": "I need a high-level architecture diagram in Mermaid format for the AGENTS.md file. It should show how lib/core/Axios.js interacts with lib/adapters/ and how interceptors from InterceptorManager.js are applied to the request flow.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add this diagram to the top of the AGENTS.md file."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "99aed3310cea23fb", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:12b3d3c54c2e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "36467a3f-1b11-4cc0-ab15-704173596915"}}
{"id": "d41b6f726d61b7e4", "prompt": "Pode me mostrar o link direto para a seção de migração v0 para v1 no guia oficial? Estou revisando o `MIGRATION_GUIDE.md` local, mas quero garantir que não pulei nenhuma nota de rodapé importante sobre `CancelToken` vs `AbortController` que tenha sido adicionada recentemente nos docs online.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d41b6f726d61b7e4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:30e1dcbe6e6c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db154495-ab2f-4014-be3e-5b2decf16160"}}
{"id": "08c16dbd35b075e9", "prompt": "Please add `dist/` and `build/` to `.gitignore`. I keep accidentally committing build artifacts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "08c16dbd35b075e9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:733a18fe891c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29362af7-f4ca-45de-ad64-d1e900ce3e3d"}}
{"id": "d0cb5fa8e306805a", "prompt": "Can you explain the difference between the XHR adapter and the fetch adapter? When does axios decide to use one over the other?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0cb5fa8e306805a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:abc8479cd563", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50bdb344-d983-4025-bcf2-9eb6bf25d92a"}}
{"id": "c9334d0e4bac5eda", "prompt": "I need to verify that `lib/adapters/xhr.js` correctly handles the `withCredentials` flag when a proxy is bypassed. Run the `tests/unit/adapters/http.test.js` file, specifically the tests related to proxy settings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9334d0e4bac5eda", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:c3feabaa90fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c942ef4e-6ab2-4d18-a195-68c4dbf07224"}}
{"id": "10eb1c0b1efd1eb6", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between lib/core/mergeConfig.js and standard JS object spreading. Why did Axios implement a custom merge utility instead of just using {...defaultConfig, ...userConfig}? Are there nested properties that behave differently?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "10eb1c0b1efd1eb6", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:94f39fb427b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "051a3074-7779-4435-8e20-a890b050321a"}}
{"id": "046b2284930d9795", "prompt": "CancelToken이 언제 deprecation warning을 출력하도록 되어 있는지 확인해 줘. 관련 코드와 테스트 케이스를 찾아줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "046b2284930d9795", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:0f9e3b560fd0", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ae8e649-eb70-4dca-af0b-ae578faac6eb"}}
{"id": "54fc64b3c23d183a", "prompt": "I need to understand the adapter pattern here. Look at `lib/adapters/adapters.js`—how are the different adapters registered or selected?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "54fc64b3c23d183a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:adb756fade36", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a285f735-d3fc-445f-9240-af95034ab7ab"}}
{"id": "095bda04d7bd373b", "prompt": "We need to improve our ESM/CJS parity. Can you look at `tests/module/esm/` and `tests/module/cjs/` to see if there are any discrepancies in how `Axios` is being exported or initialized? Specifically, check the helper files in both directories to ensure they provide consistent type support.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Identify any specific files in ESM that don't have a CJS equivalent."}, {"prompt": "Suggest improvements for `tests/module/cjs/tests/helpers/ts-require.ts`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "095bda04d7bd373b", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:6561fbb1b445", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7f9c320-98a7-4460-aaf3-2b41c2755451"}}
{"id": "5e9153796e8630a2", "prompt": "Check `lib/core/mergeConfig.js`. I want to know how deep the merge goes for nested configuration objects.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e9153796e8630a2", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:b702b9cd4741", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cafb0b3-442a-4cda-a80d-21e7484a06cc"}}
{"id": "ad80f915a7cab280", "prompt": "Check if the Axios CDN at https://unpkg.com/axios/dist/axios.min.js is currently returning a 200 OK or if there are any outages reported on status pages for unpkg.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ad80f915a7cab280", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:fa7dfd5e37fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cdab2a42-4b81-472f-ad83-7ab0b658f66d"}}
{"id": "dd7d2038756d7e91", "prompt": "Please bump the version in package.json to 1.21.0. Update the version in index.d.ts if it's there. Commit the changes with the message 'chore: bump version to 1.21.0'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dd7d2038756d7e91", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:6a3ca567da67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "becbd7a8-7b0b-49db-8b3f-7faff16ef949"}}
{"id": "aeb2a17a20359592", "prompt": "How does `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` handle the request lifecycle from the moment the config is merged until the response is returned?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aeb2a17a20359592", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:98c31dcf045f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8f8eca1d-8a3d-49e4-85e4-f7e20465b136"}}
{"id": "94bd3b442e3d0fed", "prompt": "npm test -- tests/unit/adapters/http.test.js 2>&1\n\nI'm seeing a timeout failure in `should handle request timeout` on Node 18. It passes on 20 and 22. Can you check if this is an OS-level issue or if there's an async timing bug in `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` that's more strict on older runners?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "94bd3b442e3d0fed", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:c7cce4e492da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "25bf146b-bc19-489c-930d-e8ea81b62a91"}}
{"id": "fc55c5cfd3145ac3", "prompt": "I'm trying to use the `combineURLs` helper but I'm not sure if it handles trailing slashes correctly. The docs say it concatenates URLs, but I couldn't find specific details on edge cases. Can you look up the official Axios documentation or any related RFCs on URL combining to understand the expected behavior? Also, can you check the implementation in `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` to see if it matches the documented behavior?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add a test case for trailing slash handling in `tests/unit/helpers/combineURLs.test.js`?"}, {"prompt": "Update the JSDoc for `combineURLs` to clarify the handling of slashes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fc55c5cfd3145ac3", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:16597e7e702d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b2136d7-b2bc-43dc-b226-c5c643ae4c61"}}
{"id": "26ca61c57b4268f8", "prompt": "Update the CONTRIBUTING.md to include a note about the new AGENTS.md file and how developers should contribute to the documentation for new adapters.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "26ca61c57b4268f8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:7519738107e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "115ca34c-8c2c-43e0-bd54-a4c7c923fd06"}}
{"id": "c16c7c85b85131a1", "prompt": "I just realized I forgot to add the `isAxiosError` check to the new error handler I wrote. Can you amend my last commit to include that fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c16c7c85b85131a1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:23347bf0be24", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d29051b0-1e4e-490a-af9e-3cbbd13ba5a0"}}
{"id": "f0c2838dc5d1a27b", "prompt": "The smoke tests for Bun are hanging. I'm going to open an interactive terminal session to debug the environment. Let me know when you're ready to monitor the logs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f0c2838dc5d1a27b", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:2323d9deed8a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b034018-e7b1-4b4e-b3bf-5c196bc6e740"}}
{"id": "c1bc61450bf96d4d", "prompt": "Check the dependencies section of package.json and filter out anything that has a version starting with `^` or `~`. I need a list of the exact pinned dependencies only.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For those exact ones, check if there are any sub-dependencies in package-lock.json that are also pinned exactly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c1bc61450bf96d4d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:157e000acd1a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "329de56a-47e6-43b8-aee7-b8d58d103aa5"}}
{"id": "8d8feadd617854bc", "prompt": "audit the dependencies in package.json for any known security vulnerabilities. if you find anything, suggest a fix.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8d8feadd617854bc", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:542295880654", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8660afcf-d230-4102-9473-d097420e2f13"}}
{"id": "2befb8e1c16142a5", "prompt": "Where is the `progressEventReducer` helper used?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2befb8e1c16142a5", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:5d3ba85c5ae2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f26ee7e-e782-4cd2-bd54-22b31732a629"}}
{"id": "4d0ec59e5c501ee5", "prompt": "Oi, o `mergeConfig` em `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` não está mesclando corretamente headers customizados quando usamos instâncias. Se eu configuro um header no `defaults` e outro no método, o cabeçalho customizado do método some. Alguém pode dar uma olhada?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4d0ec59e5c501ee5", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:d2cd1c317c1a", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbdcaadc-00e6-4e23-b26f-57b5d5aa2b04"}}
{"id": "a683462ff8a2c9ac", "prompt": "Add a new section to PRE_RELEASE_CHANGELOG.md detailing the fixes for the HTTP adapter errors and the methodList updates mentioned in commit e6824ee.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a683462ff8a2c9ac", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:29a9eeb6d711", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "819bb7e1-bf77-411f-b8fc-2d0325f751ac"}}
{"id": "a5da8fedf302a859", "prompt": "Look at vitest.config.js and tell me if the test timeout is configured globally. If not, I want to add a default timeout of 5000ms for all tests except the browser ones.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a5da8fedf302a859", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:ce6eb6445032", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e66ed65-f831-43c5-a5a8-871bc363ae24"}}
{"id": "27e7408d06c1b8f8", "prompt": "Hey, preciso de ajuda urgente. O `trackStream` em `lib/helpers/trackStream.js` está vazando memória em uploads grandes. O profiler mostra que os chunks não estão sendo coletados pelo GC. Segue um snippet do erro do heap dump:\n\nFATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory\n\nVerifique se o stream está sendo limpo corretamente. Não precisa mudar muita coisa, só garantir que o `destroy` ou o fechamento do stream libera a referência.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Consegue rodar os testes de unit em `tests/unit/adapters/http.test.js` para ver se não quebrou nada?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27e7408d06c1b8f8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:c6b80ff14b21", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55ffabfd-0977-4379-91ba-a6444d31267c"}}
{"id": "1f00acf4f7cfff55", "prompt": "Run prettier on the lib directory and commit the formatting changes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you verify the tests still pass after these changes?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1f00acf4f7cfff55", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:d40adc74044b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5327ca9-6c4a-4fc8-b4f4-a56d8e931c1f"}}
{"id": "45ce4bbe7dca224f", "prompt": "Stack trace when using `timeout` with fetch adapter:\n\n```text\nError: timeout of 1000ms exceeded\n    at Timeout._onTimeout (/node_modules/axios/lib/adapters/fetch.js:15:12)\n```\n\nBut the underlying fetch request actually completes successfully. The error is thrown, but the promise for `axios.get` rejects. However, if I have a fallback in an interceptor, it seems the `composeSignals` helper is not correctly cancelling the underlying signal.\n\nCheck `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js`. When the axios timeout triggers, it should cancel the AbortController. It looks like it's creating a new signal but not properly linking it to the cancellation logic in `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "45ce4bbe7dca224f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:ee7d05aa4fb9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1010f07d-50f7-4a3c-9283-ca0777a68a73"}}
{"id": "646e133afc8d1877", "prompt": "I'm seeing some inconsistency in how different runtimes handle response sizes. Please investigate `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` and `lib/core/AxiosError.js` to see if we are correctly preserving error details across runtime wrappers, similar to the recent fix in commit `56a5f1a`. Also, check if `tests/browser/fetchResponseErrors.browser.test.js` covers these cases.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Summarize the findings regarding response size error preservation."}, {"prompt": "Draft a fix if the error details are being lost during wrapping."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "646e133afc8d1877", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:5f4f98ab6a5a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b072f3e8-4d65-455d-9de6-00ac1e5983e2"}}
{"id": "afec7dfc1ea193df", "prompt": "Start the local sandbox server so I can debug the upload example manually in the browser. I need to see the network tab for `examples/upload/server.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "afec7dfc1ea193df", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:72fb191087da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5474c789-3929-4baf-a6b8-55a16c48a87c"}}
{"id": "0e76f2406f12cd7a", "prompt": "we need to add `fast-xml-parser` to the devDependencies. can you do that and update the lockfile?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0e76f2406f12cd7a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:16136a887e73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d15c83f-f8da-4090-83f8-701d86e62f27"}}
{"id": "e8970bac6c5e7f9a", "prompt": "The build is broken. Here is the error:\n`Error: Cannot find module 'lib/core/InterceptorManager'`\nDid I move some files around incorrectly?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e8970bac6c5e7f9a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:1f4cb7cc2afb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "409660bb-acfc-4398-8c6f-ddacfc70c0f2"}}
{"id": "db30331e204234ba", "prompt": "We just got flagged by Snyk on `lib/adapters/xhr.js` and `lib/adapters/http.js`. Can you take a closer look at how we handle responses and data parsing in these files? I'm worried about prototype pollution or unsafe deserialization, especially with the `transformData` and `dispatchRequest` logic. Check if there are any obvious injection vectors.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db30331e204234ba", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:3fd202c0baa9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d53dcad-d73f-4b5f-8735-c02e29970779"}}
{"id": "e73f1ea4d6da0ed1", "prompt": "In `lib/core/AxiosError.js`, change the default error message from 'Request failed with status code XXX' to 'Network error: status code XXX' for better clarity.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e73f1ea4d6da0ed1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:59c106b80048", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0bf16ed2-4078-4878-beb4-fa9f079accc2"}}
{"id": "a5f14a3e82e7e8fc", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` parameter to the `Axios` class constructor in `lib/core/Axios.js` so it can be set as a default during instantiation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a5f14a3e82e7e8fc", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:de859ec3604e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0eef5767-1cbe-419e-ac58-f9d757a7ee5b"}}
{"id": "ba2eafe2a66166be", "prompt": "Coucou, j'ai un petit souci de typage. Quand j'utilise `toFormData` dans `lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js`, TypeScript me dit que le type retour n'est pas compatible avec `FormData` standard dans certains environnements (Deno vs Node). C'est dans `index.d.ts`. Tu peux aligner les types exports pour que ça passe dans les deux contextes sans avoir à caster manuellement ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ba2eafe2a66166be", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:6fdc3f551ee7", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5bb3ea8-fd25-4019-9ee7-cb86f9d2c935"}}
{"id": "ce833b0874b5fade", "prompt": "List all local branches that haven't been merged into main yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ce833b0874b5fade", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:48846c2f7f0a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0fbd4dc6-386e-4e44-a4d4-85c886c87616"}}
{"id": "44a4de76c5977af4", "prompt": "Rename the `estimateDataURLDecodedBytes` function to `getDecodedDataURLSize` in both `lib/helpers/estimateDataURLDecodedBytes.js` and its corresponding test file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "44a4de76c5977af4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:8ebe7beaa19c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1dc40b07-1e38-4f15-ab02-cfcb5f45de16"}}
{"id": "80be4943f396d6ef", "prompt": "Hi, I'm getting this error sporadically in production when using interceptors:\n\n`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'then')`\n\nat Axios.prototype.request (lib/core/Axios.js:280)\n\nIt happens only when I chain a success and error handler that return values, but the next interceptor expects a Promise. Looks like `composeSignals` might be interfering with the promise chain resolution. Can you check `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js` and the interceptor logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80be4943f396d6ef", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:8ab2a8141a94", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43cc31f7-16f1-4141-afb4-cdc97a936cb5"}}
{"id": "f37a99d53af5372b", "prompt": "package.json과 index.d.ts를 보고 CJS와 ESM export 설정이 어떻게 되어 있는지 비교해 줘. 특히 default export와 named export가 어떻게 매핑되는지 알려줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f37a99d53af5372b", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:e2679a711b34", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8c25af7-fe41-479a-9230-67ba74af428e"}}
{"id": "fd4d98854b17cf62", "prompt": "Reviértelo todo. El último commit que hice rompió los tests de `tests/unit/api.test.js`, quiero volver al estado anterior de la rama.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fd4d98854b17cf62", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:413a9a8ce585", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f17a6b6c-3152-45ca-8c37-a6abb572e67b"}}
{"id": "b3fcb2ffb09c6136", "prompt": "I'm trying to trace where the default timeout config is actually set. Is it in lib/defaults/transitional.js or somewhere else? I need to know exactly which file defines the default values.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you list all the places that read from this timeout default?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the unit tests that verify this default value is applied correctly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b3fcb2ffb09c6136", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:6914abb375d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dadec46d-66f1-4c2f-992a-8261950db430"}}
{"id": "a215b6e558c43398", "prompt": "The error message in `lib/core/AxiosError.js` for timeout errors is a bit too vague. Can you make it more descriptive, something like 'Request timed out after [timeout]ms'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a215b6e558c43398", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:519a74d7acfa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d9cbca3-c6a3-4ffc-8f52-6f9bf331f49d"}}
{"id": "e2d24339995b0fd7", "prompt": "I see lib/helpers/composeSignals.js in the codebase. What is the purpose of this utility function and how is it used in the fetch adapter to handle AbortSignals? I'm trying to debug a cancellation issue where the request doesn't seem to aboort when expected.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e2d24339995b0fd7", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:6c0ee38df3b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc6facef-43c4-448e-9d12-6e1851affcc9"}}
{"id": "58b6c67f4b311e27", "prompt": "In `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js`, the logic for handling the `data` property seems to be stripping content-type headers unexpectedly when `data` is an empty object `{}`.\n\nHere is a failing test case:\n\n```javascript\nconst axios = require('axios');\n\naxios.post('http://localhost:3000/test', {}, {\n  headers: {\n    'Content-Type': 'application/json'\n  }\n});\n```\n\nThe resulting request has no content-type header. It should preserve the explicit header. Can you check the `transformData` or the adapter preparation logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "58b6c67f4b311e27", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:e7f316be9b21", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93129182-b649-4402-a228-6987f0b36110"}}
{"id": "33496a4a7a90a4b8", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing inconsistent error handling in the core adapters. In `lib/adapters/xhr.js` and `lib/core/transformData.js`, we're using different patterns for catching rejections and wrapping errors.\n\nI want to standardize this. Please refactor `lib/adapters/xhr.js` to use `AxiosError` (from `lib/core/AxiosError.js`) more explicitly for network failures, similar to how it's done in the fetch adapter if it exists, or at least consistent with the pattern in `lib/core/Axios.js`.\n\nAlso, while you're at it, check `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` and ensure that any errors caught there are properly transformed or re-wrapped with the correct config attached.\n\nGoal: A uniform `try...catch` block structure in `xhr.js` that creates an `AxiosError` with a specific message code (like 'ERR_NETWORK') rather than just rejecting with a generic string or Error object.\n\nDon't touch the tests, just fix the source code in these files. Let me know if you think this needs a utility function in `lib/helpers` first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "33496a4a7a90a4b8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:9d2bf952234f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9fb1aa54-402b-48d7-9369-027a5bd00f3e"}}
{"id": "9df72e6c8ecca817", "prompt": "Delete the `examples/get/server.js` file as it's no longer used in the project.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9df72e6c8ecca817", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:0372407ba512", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75c78d61-486a-4d5c-b03d-6a6e673c9c1b"}}
{"id": "01419fe2512123c9", "prompt": "In `lib/core/methodList.js`, the HTTP methods are defined. Can you extract that list and format it as a YAML array? I need to copy-paste it into our OpenAPI spec. Just the methods, one per line.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great. Now, check `lib/core/Axios.js` to see which of these methods are actually exposed on the Axios instance prototype."}, {"prompt": "Finally, compare that list against `tests/unit/api.test.js` to ensure all exposed methods have corresponding unit tests."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "01419fe2512123c9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:6e0d44aeb0a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "047c90aa-4f5f-466e-a840-8315b0bcb30a"}}
{"id": "201869791f74be68", "prompt": "Der Call-Stack für AxiosError in `lib/core/AxiosError.js` ist mir zu tief verschachtelt. Wir haben jetzt drei verschiedene Stellen, die `new AxiosError` instanzen, aber mit unterschiedlichen Args. Kannst du eine statische Factory-Methode wie `AxiosError.from(httpError, config)` in `lib/core/AxiosError.js` einbauen und die drei Aufrufer in `dispatchRequest.js`, `xhr.js` und `http.js` entsprechend anpassen? Das macht die Fehlerbehandlung viel lesbarer.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "201869791f74be68", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:0442a17edbbf", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbdf9c2a-c924-467d-855e-e8f4094742ff"}}
{"id": "c4cd04ee99411b00", "prompt": "Our pipeline failed because of a critical vulnerability in `zizmorcore/zizmor-action`. It's not our code, but it's in our `.github` workflows. I need you to verify which workflow files are directly affected and if we can pin a safe version or replace the action entirely while we wait for an upstream fix.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `lib/core/InterceptorManager.js` relies on any external dependencies that might be compromised."}, {"prompt": "Summarize the risk level for each affected workflow file."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c4cd04ee99411b00", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:a9c00ef06649", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54f715c2-b5cc-45ab-b4cf-10a59519a898"}}
{"id": "8510fc3db258a68c", "prompt": "Me mostre o conteúdo do commit `2498c23`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8510fc3db258a68c", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:203e3626be0c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3c7f7af-0619-49ad-b3f4-77b01dbd8ffe"}}
{"id": "3d1d37a4e13ed8b9", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the lib/ directory. I want to know if any of them are critical for the upcoming v1.21.0 release.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3d1d37a4e13ed8b9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:5706971cbc76", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee9c0388-cd95-49d8-8399-fcd6a10565a7"}}
{"id": "849759e030d28a87", "prompt": "We're seeing some inconsistent behavior in the smoke tests across different environments. Please investigate the following:\n- Run the smoke tests for Bun (`tests/smoke/bun/`) and check if there are any discrepancies in how `formData.smoke.test.ts` behaves compared to the ESM tests.\n- Check `tests/smoke/esm/tests/fetch.smoke.test.js` for any issues related to headers handling, especially since we recently updated the fetch wrapper logic.\n- Look at `lib/helpers/ZlibHeaderTransformStream.js` to see if it might be causing issues during stream processing in Deno environments.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find discrepancies in the Bun smoke tests, please cross-reference the implementation in `lib/platform/node/classes/URLSearchParams.js` to see if there's a polyfill mismatch."}, {"prompt": "Summarize any errors found in the Deno fetch tests vs the ESM fetch tests."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "849759e030d28a87", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:58cb909734b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50fa294f-0626-415d-a3f1-bc429a4bc621"}}
{"id": "941542ef61597948", "prompt": "Can you look at my current changes and see if they are ready for a commit? If so, please split them into logical chunks and write a professional commit message for each.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "941542ef61597948", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:c34f23160107", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "68eda7bb-179e-469d-8da5-e5055c6e28e2"}}
{"id": "f2007c5d5f9bcbeb", "prompt": "requestConsistency 유틸리티 함수가 어디에서 사용되는지 전체 코드베이스에서 검색해 줘. 호출 위치와 그 유틸리티의 정의를 같이 알려줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2007c5d5f9bcbeb", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:6abbb26f34d3", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee480552-55e9-4339-868a-e4e2387ab3d0"}}
{"id": "4cbeb084929d4e87", "prompt": "I'm seeing a typo in the error message in `lib/core/AxiosError.js`. It says 'Invalid configuration' but it should be 'Invalid configuration provided'. Can you fix that?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4cbeb084929d4e87", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:22ca20fa512f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9add4d9-41da-4f5c-a8a9-1828e921d5ad"}}
{"id": "ba094f8181a27559", "prompt": "Start the local sandbox server so I can test the browser integration tests manually. I need to hit `sandbox/client.html` and verify the XHR progress events are firing correctly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, server is running. I'll run the browser tests now. Wait for me to paste the output."}, {"prompt": "Actually, hold off on the tests. First, check if `lib/helpers/progressEventReducer.js` is handling the `loaded` vs `total` bytes correctly. I suspect we're sending zero for total on some chunked responses."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba094f8181a27559", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:f933e1483b9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6b59d55-ba07-4a7a-8a54-9da6c82c174c"}}
{"id": "2660d023b91bee32", "prompt": "I need to quickly fix a typo in `README.md` where it says 'Axios v0' instead of 'Axios v1' in the security section. Can you do that?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That's perfect. Can you split my uncommitted changes into two logical commits: one for the README fix and one for the other utility changes I made, and then push them?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2660d023b91bee32", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:cc489f5dc465", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ccfeffd-b296-4a7e-b740-1f17551485ec"}}
{"id": "b7897ac814ade765", "prompt": "O `dispatchRequest` em `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` está falhando silenciosamente quando o adapter HTTP lança um erro de rede, e não estamos capturando a mensagem de erro original antes de transformar em `AxiosError`. Isso está dificultando o debug. Pode adicionar o `cause` na cadeia de erros?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b7897ac814ade765", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:30478005ab46", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7f275fe2-cadb-4219-8572-b594decc4dc2"}}
{"id": "677e7b672d48ce0b", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify lib/core/dispatchRequest.js and what was the purpose of their change?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "677e7b672d48ce0b", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:77ef1d556abd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "03221fd2-2264-4c3d-a413-c3b89be4ad75"}}
{"id": "80c64b955046ac6f", "prompt": "I'm checking the latest release notes on GitHub. Can you fetch the raw content of https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/latest to see if v1.20.0 has any breaking change warnings? I need to know if the API for cancel tokens changed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "80c64b955046ac6f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:6ba9dee8b250", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "20b9a383-4bd8-4359-ba88-09565bf92290"}}
{"id": "a72cb1f07f5df0e9", "prompt": "I'm trying to optimize the bundle size. Can you run the size snapshot benchmark or whatever script generates the build stats? I want to see if recent changes to `lib/adapters/xhr.js` bloated the output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a72cb1f07f5df0e9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:5a598a11d74b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2dfea611-f96a-45ec-b0b0-98539e27ad9f"}}
{"id": "ac117686048a1e6f", "prompt": "Show me all the places where `progressEventReducer` is defined or exported. I need to understand how upload progress tracking works.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac117686048a1e6f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:3f5775e4ac42", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e84863f-9317-43ed-bf53-1d2dac09678f"}}
{"id": "377660df981908d3", "prompt": "In lib/core/InterceptorManager.js, I noticed that interceptors are stored in arrays. Are they executed in a FIFO order? Specifically, if I add a request interceptor after adding another one, which one runs first on the outgoing request?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "377660df981908d3", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:faefd4a8250e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ff468ce0-21c1-4b25-8252-05b5201a6810"}}
{"id": "818b5604b7f09c40", "prompt": "git stash my current changes in `lib/core/Axios.js`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "818b5604b7f09c40", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:399198f79523", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2be47c3b-ff5e-4f4e-a3ca-f2c92526f2cc"}}
{"id": "f5389159c398d51d", "prompt": "grep for all TODO comments in the codebase. I want to know how many we have and where they are located. Focus on `lib/`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, create a list of them in a new file so we can track them."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f5389159c398d51d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:5824690e304f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "abd6c954-3ccf-41b9-bf83-a8261e4f614a"}}
{"id": "449a4be488ff10cd", "prompt": "Run a secret detection scan on the git history. I suspect we accidentally committed an AWS key to `sandbox/server.js` or `tests/setup/server.js` a few months ago. Even if it's been deleted, I need to know if the key is still in the history.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "449a4be488ff10cd", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:39fe2fa0b517", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80edda35-7f32-452e-a6e0-a15b0b6675b7"}}
{"id": "adb636f1415cc9e8", "prompt": "I noticed `lib/core/methodList.js` might be missing some common HTTP methods. Can you check it and add 'OPTIONS' to the list if it's not there?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "adb636f1415cc9e8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:237359f5b933", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d8dfdf0-34c7-4fc7-82c5-3e73f94677bb"}}
{"id": "ff69d8c5a5e68f37", "prompt": "We're migrating to ESM and some tests in `tests/smoke/esm/` are failing differently in Node than they do in the browser. I'm worried about security context differences. Specifically, look at `tests/unit/adapters/http.test.js` and `tests/unit/adapters/xhr.test.js`. Are we inadvertently trusting unvalidated headers or responses? Run a quick audit on how we merge configs in `lib/core/mergeConfig.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ff69d8c5a5e68f37", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:1a100764ab6a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2639ab02-035f-4113-8402-67da391941a7"}}
{"id": "465fc467a99c3489", "prompt": "Hey, I'm trying to understand the new cancel token API changes. The PR description mentions that CancelToken is deprecated in favor of AbortController. I checked the Axios release notes but couldn't find detailed migration steps. Could you look up the official Axios migration guide for switching from CancelToken to AbortController? Also, can you check if there are any examples in the codebase that show the recommended way to handle cancellation now?\n\nfollow_ups\": [\"Can you update the example in `examples/cancel/` to use AbortController instead of CancelToken?\", \"Add a comment in `lib/cancel/CancelToken.js` pointing to the migration guide.\"]},{", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "465fc467a99c3489", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:86914f4af8f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "10f1a472-de6f-4f03-bb95-abd1f139a1c2"}}
{"id": "fd564e8d9297c421", "prompt": "Quem alterou a última vez o arquivo `lib/core/Axios.js` e por que essa mudança foi feita?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fd564e8d9297c421", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:1b031cd0a3c4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "197fad80-26f4-4e9e-b37c-4cdd42564712"}}
{"id": "8f24f0b0dfa38a44", "prompt": "Hey, can you run prettier on the lib/ directory? Also, please run the linter and auto-fix any issues it finds. Don't touch the tests or node_modules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8f24f0b0dfa38a44", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:845e75d3c29b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f967eb5-f086-4d18-b3d2-62bb71f74045"}}
{"id": "8cc203aa9f7db281", "prompt": "In lib/core/dispatchRequest.js, how does Axios decide which adapter to use when no specific adapter is passed in the config? I see logic involving globalThis.fetch and navigator, but I want to make sure I understand the fallback chain for SSR environments.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8cc203aa9f7db281", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:e9abb5c6b675", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f08fcb93-a95c-485d-83f8-2b1da4a19f7a"}}
{"id": "80db93b708ac4efa", "prompt": "In `lib/core/Axios.js`, add an optional `timeoutRetry` parameter to the constructor that allows specifying how many times a request should be retried on timeout.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80db93b708ac4efa", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:b9af05e6d5ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6e01a605-a1d3-445b-8599-c4cae27dbf82"}}
{"id": "89048617f0ba59ca", "prompt": "Refactor task: I want to clean up the adapter layer. Please: 1) Review `lib/adapters/xhr.js` to see if the progress event dispatching logic can be simplified, 2) Check `lib/adapters/adapters.js` for any deprecated patterns, and 3) Ensure `tests/unit/adapters/xhr.test.js` is fully passing after any logic changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "89048617f0ba59ca", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:d25363f1c71e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "990b87bf-06da-43b1-8cb4-6c85328f90ee"}}
{"id": "3a793920f01570de", "prompt": "I'm looking at lib/defaults/transitional.js. Why does the default behavior for `silentJSONParsing` and `forcedJSONParsing` exist? It seems like JSON should always be parsed automatically. What is the historical context or edge case this was meant to fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3a793920f01570de", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:58cf9ceefd7b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b832e56f-42c8-434a-a6e0-0dc9e736c0e9"}}
{"id": "2606635d8c320f95", "prompt": "Can you check if the project builds successfully? Just run the prepublishOnly script or whatever command builds the UMD bundles. I want to make sure nothing is broken.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2606635d8c320f95", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:d99d7605b4b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0240edb5-844e-4932-9979-0a447d8affba"}}
{"id": "d6b431f597cfb573", "prompt": "Can you add a type definition to expose the `defaultMarker` in `lib/core/Axios.js`? I saw a recent commit `fbe2e82` that mentioned exposing it, but I can't find the actual type export in `index.d.ts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d6b431f597cfb573", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:c344f6a9fd52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3951bfcd-8d27-4aa9-9434-f7d947c89ef2"}}
{"id": "7a7ef287d90ef4d0", "prompt": "I need to reproduce a bug where the cancel token isn't aborting the underlying XHR in Safari. Can you set up the sandbox server in `sandbox/server.js` and open `sandbox/client.html` so I can trigger the issue manually?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a7ef287d90ef4d0", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:5775be60dca1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "021ac589-1ae6-4e05-8edf-324ff40d0afd"}}
{"id": "e8eeabdb71195b51", "prompt": "Can you check package.json and tell me how many direct vs devDependencies we have? I just need the counts, not the list.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e8eeabdb71195b51", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:86938d2010d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5aff3c5f-acf0-4715-9484-4988e994ca09"}}
{"id": "2081b0d86f8d899c", "prompt": "Run the linting checks on `lib/helpers/progressEventReducer.js`. I made some changes to throttle the progress updates but I'm worried about the code style.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2081b0d86f8d899c", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:88d11f6cdfc1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1341cb32-466b-4224-9c07-374f09bf752b"}}
{"id": "7efa01ba4c405d80", "prompt": "Faz um git blame na linha 45 do arquivo `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` para eu ver quem mexeu ali.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7efa01ba4c405d80", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:e03833bdf314", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa237cc7-83c0-44c9-9aee-ba8163a0e0b1"}}
{"id": "36d392c42e2031c5", "prompt": "I need to audit our dependency tree. Can you parse `package.json` and `package-lock.json` and give me a count of all direct dependencies (excluding devDependencies)? Also, check if there are any duplicate versions of the same package in the lockfile and list them if found.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36d392c42e2031c5", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:cf2a87317f02", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39495399-2608-403b-bb3b-30701fb6f24f"}}
{"id": "eefc18c5bd6f9d8c", "prompt": "Agrega una validación en `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` para que si el usuario pasa un objeto de configuración vacío, no sobrescriba los valores por defecto de Axios.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ahora que funciona, crea una nueva rama llamada `fix/empty-config-validation` y haz un commit con los cambios usando un mensaje siguiendo el formato de la convención del proyecto."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eefc18c5bd6f9d8c", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:987152d0baac", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a8bb494-1c99-4243-845f-5d08dca50aff"}}
{"id": "17f27063204b70fa", "prompt": "Estou recebendo um erro `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'data')` ao usar `transformData` com respostas de erros. Parece que o `AxiosError` não está sendo passado corretamente para a função de transformação em `lib/core/transformData.js`. Alguém sabe o porquê?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "17f27063204b70fa", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:d50cb90d613c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb9f3e13-923c-402c-aa00-64af79d43f21"}}
{"id": "f20a68f5fc1bef55", "prompt": "Hey, can you add a new test case in `tests/unit/helpers/combineURLs.test.js` to ensure it handles trailing slashes correctly when merging two paths?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks, that looks good. Now create a new branch called `fix/combine-urls-slashes` and commit these changes with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f20a68f5fc1bef55", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:e8a0c485325c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8f213e30-48a2-4a81-af9f-014a44406aa4"}}
{"id": "8fb66604d92bf9bd", "prompt": "We need to prep for the next minor release. Can you handle the following: 1) Audit `lib/helpers/` for any unused utility functions, 2) Check `tests/unit/helpers/` to ensure all existing helpers have corresponding tests, and 3) Update the `README.md` sponsor section to include the new sponsors from the recent commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8fb66604d92bf9bd", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:c0dd1230b50b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a415691-75ab-4875-9293-dbd5f8121c01"}}
{"id": "68e714b36624764c", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/unit/helpers/isAbsoluteURL.test.js` to verify that it correctly handles protocol-relative URLs like '//example.com'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "68e714b36624764c", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:371aa562a54a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "961675e7-50fe-49b4-8052-9d7cd6ac3379"}}
{"id": "8b2046f8b19f802f", "prompt": "The smoke tests are becoming a bottleneck for the CI. Please investigate `tests/smoke/bun/`, `tests/smoke/deno/`, and `tests/smoke/esm/`. I want to know if we can consolidate any of the duplicate logic in these test suites, especially around the `fetch` and `formData` tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b2046f8b19f802f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:67b7586b3bad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "026406c3-570a-4b8a-adcd-63f520fca728"}}
{"id": "46bbc69847c8dcc4", "prompt": "I need to find where the default headers are set for a new request. It's probably in defaults or dispatchRequest. Point me to the right file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "46bbc69847c8dcc4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:1a796c13d091", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1225fa99-6bb9-41cd-8a17-fd147d6b7b51"}}
{"id": "6f2b0d97ec270c72", "prompt": "Bonjour, je rencontre un problème avec `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js`. Quand je fais une requête POST avec un corps vide (`data: ''`), le Content-Length n'est pas défini, ce qui fait que certains serveurs rejettent la requête. J'ai vérifié le code dans `setFormDataHeaders` mais ça ne semble pas toucher les chaînes vides. Peux-tu corriger cela pour s'assurer que le header est bien présent ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f2b0d97ec270c72", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:a5a8328eff80", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be8c0cf1-a625-4e7a-a7d7-c78af9b7bfae"}}
{"id": "57a0c0b0c72a2a20", "prompt": "Ich brauche Hilfe beim Abfangen von `AbortSignal`-Logik. Aktuell ist das in `lib/cancel/CancelToken.js` und `composeSignals` verstreut. `CancelToken` ist deprecated, wir sollten alles auf `composeSignals.js` mappen. Bitte schreib den Code in `lib/cancel/CancelToken.js` so um, dass er intern nur noch `composeSignals` aufruft und die Legacy-Funktionalität simuliert. Wir wollen den Code für v2 bereinigen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "57a0c0b0c72a2a20", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:3cbf9c9289e4", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2216e6ff-56bc-4518-a5ff-31f0714cae47"}}
{"id": "adb7609835cf3933", "prompt": "Wir brauchen in `lib/utils.js` eine konsistente Prüfroutine für URL-Schemata. Aktuell ist das in `lib/helpers/isAbsoluteURL.js`, `lib/helpers/fromDataURI.js` und `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` wild verstreut. Schmiss die ganze Logik in `lib/helpers/normalizeURLForProtocolCheck.js` zusammen und importier sie überall dort, wo URL-Prüfung nötig ist. Bitte nichts kaputt machen, die Smoke-Tests in `tests/smoke/esm/tests/` müssen grün bleiben.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "adb7609835cf3933", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:a04f96afd520", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e3fe6c3-d149-48d5-8550-335fea599884"}}
{"id": "e291d73101f0ac11", "prompt": "I'm working on a huge refactor. Can you create a new branch `refactor/core-logic` for me? I don't want to commit anything yet, just move my work there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e291d73101f0ac11", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:2ed07100a151", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "79ec82db-f273-4fac-80e1-20638f05ae6f"}}
{"id": "d39f54bbb7653504", "prompt": "I'm trying to figure out why my custom adapter isn't picking up the headers correctly. Looking at `lib/core/mergeConfig.js`, it seems like default headers might be overwritten instead of merged. The Axios docs at https://axios-http.com/docs/interceptors mention header merging behavior. Can you check the official Axios documentation on how headers are supposed to be merged in custom adapters? Also, are there any known issues with header merging in the latest release?\n\nfollow_ups\": [\"Can you check if there's a test case that verifies header merging behavior in custom adapters?\", \"Look for any recent commits related to header merging in `lib/core/mergeConfig.js`.\"]},{", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d39f54bbb7653504", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:5b66f00e4ad5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dcc85b9-711b-4bb9-8184-102de9cd05c0"}}
{"id": "0e72c6b9e6bfc0cc", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird issue where the progress event isn't firing correctly on long uploads in Node. Can you look at `lib/helpers/progressEventReducer.js` and the related test in `tests/unit/adapters/http.test.js`? I think the logic for calculating bytes might be off.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e72c6b9e6bfc0cc", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:f27ed6d60405", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adb43b08-e748-4b3b-b31b-97cc6a953502"}}
{"id": "e9c6af4e88d4da45", "prompt": "Ich möchte `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` so umbauen, dass wir den `validateConfig`-Call nicht mehr inline haben, sondern über die zentrale `validator.js`-Helper-Funktion leiten. Das ist veraltet und führt zu Duplikaten. Kannst du die Logik aus `dispatchRequest` in `lib/helpers/validator.js` konsolidieren? Stelle sicher, dass alle Typ-Definitionen in `index.d.ts` weiterhin passen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e9c6af4e88d4da45", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:d6617d2b6e3c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00017ef3-3632-44ba-add0-9fd924432712"}}
{"id": "3584a118148ccfc8", "prompt": "How does axios handle HTTP/2 multiplexing in the default HTTP adapter? Is it automatic or do I need special config?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there any documentation on the new `Http2Sessions` helper?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3584a118148ccfc8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:9ef7086f07df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "24a6ed97-8c17-4db8-a92d-83a04f9b16bf"}}
{"id": "884db31e355c64e8", "prompt": "How does `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` handle the request lifecycle? I want to understand the order of operations from when a request is initiated until the response is returned.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "884db31e355c64e8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:42bea90a19e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "495bdba8-8795-4998-af46-4b82ebcd5760"}}
{"id": "b1acf123d6d24ba3", "prompt": "I'm getting a TypeError in the browser tests. Specifically, `tests/browser/xsrf.browser.test.js` is failing when trying to access `document.cookie`. Can you check if we need to mock the DOM environment in vitest for this specific test file? The error says `document is not defined`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b1acf123d6d24ba3", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:9cdd4fe7f4c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53341449-cb04-4232-ac7c-05af6ac4acef"}}
{"id": "bec6e3b17a5fc9af", "prompt": "Olá, estou vendo que estamos usando `js-yaml`. O changelog recente menciona uma atualização da versão 4.1.0 para 4.3.2. Pode verificar na documentação oficial do js-yaml o que mudou nessa versão específica e se há alguma quebra de compatibilidade (breaking change) que precise ser observada nos nossos testes ou código?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bec6e3b17a5fc9af", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:41285978d58a", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd569634-0549-4c86-9289-578da1420d1d"}}
{"id": "a4969c5eb988449a", "prompt": "I need to verify the current security advisory for the `form-data` package since we're migrating away from node classes. Can you check the GitHub security advisories page for any new CVEs affecting dependencies in Axios v1.x?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a4969c5eb988449a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:71969fce8687", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f33e65d-18fa-41c8-adfc-3b1e20bd53bd"}}
{"id": "c09558d7a0dcf8f6", "prompt": "The error message 'Request failed with status code 401' is showing up but I want to know exactly where that string comes from and what AxiosError properties are set during dispatch failures. Can you find the source?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c09558d7a0dcf8f6", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:34cdc4e5219a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe8a197f-2644-4eb2-9b24-a12fde10aca8"}}
{"id": "b59fefff92ef4d72", "prompt": "O erro `SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module` está ocorrendo nos testes CJS (`tests/smoke/cjs`). Pelos docs do Node sobre o campo `type` no `package.json`, acho que podemos ter um conflito entre os arquivos `.js` e `.cjs`. Podes me confirmar se a documentação do Node recomenda explicitamente o uso de extensões para distinguir ESM de CJS ou se o `exports` map resolve isso?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b59fefff92ef4d72", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:e40de21cf9c8", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "435863c4-45ea-4daa-b0d3-b5a6e117c186"}}
{"id": "0f74accc392ae1d2", "prompt": "Hey, can you check `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` ? It seems like when I pass `transformRequest: [fn]` in the instance config and `transformRequest: [otherFn]` in the request config, they aren't being merged correctly. The second one overrides the first instead of appending, but the docs say they should be combined in order. The logic in the deep merge part seems to skip arrays by default. Please update the array merge strategy for config objects.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0f74accc392ae1d2", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:c474d793ea8e", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "36114628-9447-4996-ad3f-fe69ed803b6b"}}
{"id": "067e3e63084e93b8", "prompt": "Which file handles the XHR adapter specifically? I want to see the code that deals with upload progress.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Where is the `composeSignals` function defined?"}, {"prompt": "Is there an equivalent in the fetch adapter?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "067e3e63084e93b8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:281495809101", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19c2a884-ec6f-4b44-8621-b8d70a85a6d7"}}
{"id": "a8ed7d1ab1160384", "prompt": "What is the purpose of `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js`? Is this related to the new AbortSignal support?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me an example of how it's used in `lib/core/Axios.js`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a8ed7d1ab1160384", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:95283eb5fe2f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d4939949-bf9d-4eda-a569-1d4232c5cd63"}}
{"id": "89c0c9ec6a545ec1", "prompt": "O que mudou no `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` entre o commit `e6824ee` e o `d8a919f`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "89c0c9ec6a545ec1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:974b1f68d8e2", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95f940e0-e809-46aa-be24-cc36870ac870"}}
{"id": "392fc1d55519ef96", "prompt": "i noticed we're using an older version of `nanoid` in some docs/submodules. check the repo for any other outdated nanoid instances and suggest an upgrade path.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "392fc1d55519ef96", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:d55ec5d036e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6abaed07-d6d2-4e13-92f4-995c1f84c5ac"}}
{"id": "848706a4cab8f06d", "prompt": "Add a new unit test in `tests/unit/core/mergeConfig.test.js` to ensure that deep merging works correctly when nested config objects are provided.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "848706a4cab8f06d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:6b1f10394eb4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56cf86f3-57df-4933-ba56-b17fdb08634b"}}
{"id": "8b9561c4615c8f5e", "prompt": "Verifica o arquivo `lib/core/methodList.js`. Para que serve essa lista e como ela é usada para validar os métodos HTTP?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b9561c4615c8f5e", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:e77cf118cdcd", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74514610-850f-4170-bf21-696c2e0fcc89"}}
{"id": "19ad03e067ba31fe", "prompt": "We are seeing issues with the rate limiter in `tests/smoke/esm/tests/rateLimit.smoke.test.js`. Does the endpoint `https://httpbin.org/rate-limit/5` currently accept requests, or is it returning 429 Too Many Requests for everyone right now?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "19ad03e067ba31fe", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:324a410bec94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e9a5df9-61e0-4b52-91a0-a781329472e1"}}
{"id": "bc2e558d0eb73858", "prompt": "Trace the usage of `AxiosError`. Which files import it and where does it get instantiated?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc2e558d0eb73858", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:5d3cc1c5a5b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c67a0998-41e0-4c42-820e-102d52ffea69"}}
{"id": "987b120c386dc8e0", "prompt": "I need to simulate an authenticated session for the smoke tests. Generate a dummy JWT token that I can paste into our test config.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "987b120c386dc8e0", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:64d9527b5a63", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99f1a0de-b505-49e2-bda5-60aeaa1e5d63"}}
{"id": "cc23e8e34312559f", "prompt": "I noticed some linting issues in the build logs. Can you run the linter and fix the automatically fixable errors? After that, please run the tests to make sure nothing broke.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did the linting pass without errors?"}, {"prompt": "What was the diff after fixing the lint issues?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cc23e8e34312559f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:d303be7560ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08a16565-4494-4385-be07-98e8367a91a8"}}
{"id": "645ea25587fea8b2", "prompt": "I'm looking at `lib/cancel/CancelToken.js`. How does the cancellation mechanism actually trigger the rejection in a pending request?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "645ea25587fea8b2", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:6b68d656df49", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fba1e780-4ae5-4b76-b54c-9ca9710b4aeb"}}
{"id": "3be35d2114040880", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the smoke tests in the ESM directory but it seems like the local server isn't responding. Can you check if there are any active processes running on the default test ports and kill them if they are?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the output of the process check."}, {"prompt": "Try running the tests again after clearing those ports."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3be35d2114040880", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:3da6b47bfdd7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8134ab05-e2d7-49dd-9b2a-0bba51298dbb"}}
{"id": "4bf45805858fce60", "prompt": "Looking at tests/unit/core/mergeConfig.test.js, it seems like the merge logic handles headers deeply. If I pass headers in the user config, are they merged with the default headers or do they completely overwrite them? I need to know this to ensure my custom User-Agent header isn't being stripped out.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this apply to the XSRF-TOKEN header as well?"}, {"prompt": "Can you confirm if this is the behavior in v1.x?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4bf45805858fce60", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:41321f994299", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5521537-77bf-443c-9350-bc9e3940253c"}}
{"id": "2e7aeefa200836c5", "prompt": "I'm seeing some issues with how URLs are being constructed. Can you look at `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` and tell me how it handles relative paths versus absolute URLs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2e7aeefa200836c5", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:433aa9aa10ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb76d991-553d-46d7-bd83-a377826be1d5"}}
{"id": "3e1283676ac2d755", "prompt": "Check git blame on lib/adapters/xhr.js around line 110 to see why that progress dispatch logic was added.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3e1283676ac2d755", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:0c157a76c26c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8d2ed50-fc95-43a2-b9a6-52c0ebe8a0ed"}}
{"id": "db00df81fdcbc98d", "prompt": "Compara as referências `v1.20.0` com o commit `84a9f3b`. Quais arquivos foram modificados?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db00df81fdcbc98d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:a22d8e269319", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aec21b52-ad82-45c1-a066-0664d0b36109"}}
{"id": "0f356df574e66dc4", "prompt": "Revert the changes from commit `e6824ee` (the one that fixed core methodList) because it's causing regressions in the browser tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0f356df574e66dc4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:57b037b3d232", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a4b4ba7d-4e66-4d1a-9bd5-73f4812f1fa9"}}
{"id": "523aea6a13a82b48", "prompt": "The version in package.json is currently 1.20.0. Bump it to 1.21.0-rc.1 for the release candidate build.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "523aea6a13a82b48", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:f008b94416ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63c525d5-b7a4-416d-b9c3-890ffefccddd"}}
{"id": "ea2fb87d2f66dbc8", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the next major version. Can you perform a technical audit across these three areas? \n1. Check `lib/core/Axios.js` and `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` for any deprecated patterns in how config is merged.\n2. Review `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` to ensure it handles edge cases with protocol-relative URLs correctly.\n3. Scan `tests/unit/api.test.js` and let me know if the current test coverage for interceptors is sufficient given the recent changes in `lib/core/InterceptorManager.js`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the config merge audit, specifically look for any logic that might conflict with the new `methodList` changes in `lib/core/methodList.js`."}, {"prompt": "Analyze the `combineURLs` logic against the existing `lib/helpers/isAbsoluteURL.js` implementation to ensure consistency."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ea2fb87d2f66dbc8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:aa6d39cc2684", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a6bb68e-cb10-4454-ae98-4947b23b347d"}}
{"id": "22b642faf448580a", "prompt": "Compare the changes in package.json between the current state and the commit 84a9f3b (the 1.20.0 release preparation).", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Were there any significant dependency bumps in that range?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22b642faf448580a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:d079cbaa7224", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6443a881-0a20-4506-add0-73035891d849"}}
{"id": "a9aaa0571a6b5101", "prompt": "Explica o fluxo de execução do `dispatchRequest.js`. Quando eu chamo um `axios.get()`, o que acontece dentro desse arquivo até a requisição ser enviada?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Onde os interceptors são aplicados nesse fluxo?"}, {"prompt": "Como o `mergeConfig.js` entra nessa história antes do dispatch?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9aaa0571a6b5101", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:2bcd567e2681", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce4b3fd3-59a1-404b-b48b-518d25a364d5"}}
{"id": "0837e86c56d5f2de", "prompt": "Run the ESM module smoke tests. I'm worried about a breaking change in how we default export if someone uses `import axios from 'axios'` vs `import { Axios } from 'axios'`. Just need to see if `tests/smoke/esm/tests/import.smoke.test.js` fails.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0837e86c56d5f2de", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:22def1909fc0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "256bc4d4-8938-4f3a-b85d-cd3c83f20802"}}
{"id": "3ce8315ea93d7a31", "prompt": "In `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js`, how exactly do the request interceptors get executed relative to the actual HTTP adapters (like `xhr.js` or the http adapter)? I'm trying to understand if I can short-circuit the entire request before it hits the network layer, or if the chain always proceeds.\n\nAlso, what is the specific execution order for response interceptors? Do they run before or after the AxiosError transformation in `transformData`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ce8315ea93d7a31", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:fe9baa72ddc1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "456b877d-016f-4235-b2cc-09c82881037e"}}
{"id": "22ffb6d10aa900c8", "prompt": "I noticed `lib/helpers/null.js` seems redundant. Can you check if it's actually used anywhere in the codebase? If not, delete it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22ffb6d10aa900c8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:d125c3f9df44", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "57fa9f0d-e807-4835-a7ae-08cc158c5f12"}}
{"id": "ac9054d94d2e34bb", "prompt": "Run the lint suite. It's failing on CI and I can't tell why from the logs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac9054d94d2e34bb", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:d33f99207503", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28cb5ca4-a922-4d70-8de4-2012e552cd82"}}
{"id": "2d55ac58a2a78272", "prompt": "Hey, I need a random 32-character hex string to use as a mock CSRF token for my local testing in `sandbox/client.js`. Can you generate one for me?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2d55ac58a2a78272", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:dfa5af8d54a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d9325014-9ffd-429a-ac88-7aee4e3e9f64"}}
{"id": "1426907f2d40c493", "prompt": "Add a new unit test in `tests/unit/helpers/combineURLs.test.js` that checks how it handles trailing slashes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Create a branch 'feature/combine-urls-tests' and commit this."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1426907f2d40c493", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:ba5c4d46385d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa9934cf-16a4-415d-85af-066374f663c9"}}
{"id": "d2689cef739e0647", "prompt": "Add a unit test for `lib/helpers/isAbsoluteURL.js` in `tests/unit/helpers/isAbsoluteURL.test.js` to cover relative paths starting with `//`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d2689cef739e0647", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:9c8dacfe068e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2165501c-479a-4874-b381-542b4aaea920"}}
{"id": "dd6527df1b1f1c0e", "prompt": "I need to verify the SSL/TLS security posture of https://httpbin.org. Please fetch the current CVE details for any vulnerabilities associated with the version of OpenSSL running on their servers if visible, or confirm if there are any known active CVEs for HTTP/2 implementations commonly used by such proxies. Also, please check the live response headers for 'Strict-Transport-Security' and 'Content-Security-Policy' to see if we should enforce stricter checks in our Axios defaults.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update lib/defaults/transitional.js to include a new option for strict CSP checking."}, {"prompt": "Run the browser tests in tests/browser to ensure the new CSP check doesn't break existing functionality."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dd6527df1b1f1c0e", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:ec6e82dd1d9e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aceeeb10-da60-4a57-a416-69c18ad8af3f"}}
{"id": "341117938b83a340", "prompt": "Please perform a maintenance sweep: \n1. Check `package.json` and all `package.json` files in `tests/` for outdated dependencies.\n2. Verify that `lib/core/methodList.js` is correctly aligned with the latest HTTP method standards.\n3. Run the tests in `tests/unit/utils/` to ensure no regressions in the core utility logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "341117938b83a340", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:d8136becf1ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e35be87-fd9f-445f-b51f-83218f4eb402"}}
{"id": "6327497fa323fec3", "prompt": "What is the purpose of the `composeSignals` helper found in lib/helpers? I saw it in recent commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6327497fa323fec3", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:9885ef1d2a27", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b6c0fed-c301-42f8-8626-0d6f5ae49779"}}
{"id": "855d1a7bab68e272", "prompt": "In .npmrc, I see we have some private registry config. Can you extract just the registry URL? I'm writing a script to validate if we're hitting the right repo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "855d1a7bab68e272", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:caeb1cc3531c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48952165-f169-4a11-b341-21cf564f3729"}}
{"id": "6e6f6636a0328b53", "prompt": "Salut, est-ce que tu peux regarder `lib/adapters/xhr.js` ? L'événement `progress` ne se déclenche pas correctement en mode téléchargement (download). Le `totalBytes` est 0 alors que la réponse est énorme. Dans `progressEventReducer` je vois qu'il y a une condition qui ignore les réponses sans headers explicites, mais XHR devrait toujours avoir ces infos. Fixes-moi ça.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Parfait, les tests passent. Est-ce que tu peux aussi vérifier `lib/helpers/trackStream.js` car j'ai vu qu'il y a une logique similaire qui pourrait souffrir du même problème avec les streamables responses dans l'adapter Node."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6e6f6636a0328b53", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:295dba0f25c4", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29bd6de8-51a8-4fd1-8572-c8c0b177ea08"}}
{"id": "ed334944f09b5d8f", "prompt": "Hi, ich habe gerade versucht, ein Update auf die neueste稳定 Version (laut npm ist es 1.20.0) zu machen. Mein Projekt nutzt aber noch die alte v0.x Struktur und wir nutzen `xhr`. Beim Refactoring bin ich über `lib/core/AxiosError` gestolpert.\n\nIn der alten Version konnte ich einfach auf `error.code` prüfen, aber jetzt bekomme ich Warnungen, dass `code` deprecated ist und ich lieber `ERR_BAD_REQUEST` aus `isAxiosError` nutzen sollte. Kannst du mir kurz die offizielle Migration Guide Seite öffnen oder mir erklären, wie ich meinen `catch` Block umschreibe, damit er sauber auf Errors überprüft? Hier mal der alte Code:\n\n```javascript\ntry {\n  await axios.get('/api/data');\n} catch (error) {\n  if (error.code === 'ERR_BAD_REQUEST') {\n    console.log('Bad Request');\n  }\n}\n```", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Danke, das hilft schon mal weiter. Ich schaue mir mal `lib/helpers/isAxiosError.js` an, um zu sehen, wie der Check intern funktioniert."}, {"prompt": "Ok, alles klar. Ich habe die Tests in `tests/unit/helpers/isAxiosError.test.js` angeguckt und jetzt passt es. Ich aktualisiere die Logik entsprechend."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ed334944f09b5d8f", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:e826391b008a", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "27b4112b-ce85-475d-81a1-4d722217b864"}}
{"id": "b791f43a123a4ce6", "prompt": "There's a weird issue with `lib/core/methodList.js`. It seems like the HTTP methods are hardcoded. Can you list them all out? I want to verify we aren't missing PATCH.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b791f43a123a4ce6", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axios:f4c9be3dd4ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "658318dc-412e-4891-8234-882ac0c87eb4"}}
{"id": "4de7fb817d1103a2", "prompt": "Refactor `lib/core/methodList.js` to use a frozen object instead of a regular object for better performance and immutability.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4de7fb817d1103a2", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:02bbe904c5ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80ac54b9-d71c-409c-890f-e382310aa13c"}}
{"id": "5c8d867827214907", "prompt": "I need to trace where Http2Sessions is instantiated. Show me all the import or require statements and any direct class instantiations across the codebase.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check if there are any tests that specifically mock or verify the Http2Sessions behavior?"}, {"prompt": "I want to see if this is exported anywhere in the public API."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5c8d867827214907", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:d93cc729ef33", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f2fd9b9b-7ad7-4cfe-9d31-d6cb4a3bba93"}}
{"id": "697d0f8c56303021", "prompt": "Please run the full smoke test suite for the ESM build. I suspect the new interceptors might be breaking something in the child process execution.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "697d0f8c56303021", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:0324f3ca38f9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6712702f-2e2c-4e8a-8db0-ece26c4764fe"}}
{"id": "cc8545f2eb7081c9", "prompt": "Write a technical documentation entry for lib/helpers/composeSignals.js. Explain how it handles multiple AbortSignal inputs and how it should be used within the core request lifecycle.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Include a small TypeScript example of how to use it in a custom interceptor."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc8545f2eb7081c9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:c4386a032330", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbe1a279-d175-491d-b7cc-2f7ef811916a"}}
{"id": "2b50754947081284", "prompt": "Where is the retry logic implemented in this codebase? I'm looking for the actual mechanism that handles retries, not just config options.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2b50754947081284", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:71c361d0ed04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0bf516b7-b536-442d-8026-10cd35bf1d81"}}
{"id": "08c6ac5180541862", "prompt": "Can you find the process ID for the Node server that's running `examples/post/server.js` and stop it? It's blocking my port.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "08c6ac5180541862", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:cda246de0d16", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b083f7d6-7b09-4724-8332-6873fdeaed36"}}
{"id": "13e981cc4ecfeeab", "prompt": "Estou tentando entender o tratamento de erros. O que a classe `AxiosError` em `lib/core/AxiosError.js` faz de diferente de um erro padrão do JS?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "13e981cc4ecfeeab", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:6a28a4294cf3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d02841ce-4f8a-4523-81da-2fd8e28962d8"}}
{"id": "d19393ee96798881", "prompt": "Can you explain the purpose of `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js`? I'm trying to see how it manages multiple AbortSignals.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d19393ee96798881", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:6a39218338e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "45d958ad-dd90-4617-9e85-45ce8a2f7e3d"}}
{"id": "f13262a9447807ab", "prompt": "Create a draft for the 1.20.0 release notes. Include the security update promotion for v0 users, the fix for response size errors in fetch, and the XHR progress flush fix.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f13262a9447807ab", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:8caaaa33f846", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12c968ae-d705-47e0-8c4b-fb72e5885e21"}}
{"id": "8a2524df3bf7dc7d", "prompt": "Look at `lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js` and `lib/helpers/fromDataURI.js`. I'm seeing reports of potential ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) because of complex backtracking in URL parsing. Can you review the regex patterns used there? Also check `lib/helpers/composeSignals.js` for any similar issues.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8a2524df3bf7dc7d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:571cbe030fc1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4991855-5c2e-45c0-bd8e-60aad3af2f4a"}}
{"id": "5b1f718ca58578d8", "prompt": "Can you quickly check if `tests/smoke/esm/tests/http2.smoke.test.js` passes? I'm seeing a failure in my local dev environment and I want to isolate if it's my setup or the code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5b1f718ca58578d8", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axios:38a0dbcfb46e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebcafa7e-0f41-4c09-9355-72cc582a49c8"}}
{"id": "1eaec49c069b9aa7", "prompt": "Estou tentando entender a recomendação oficial do Vite/Vitest para configuração de testes de integração. A documentação atual sugere usar `server.watcher.ignored` ou há alguma nova opção `watch` no `vitest.config.js` que é preferível para evitar recompilações desnecessárias em pastas como `sandbox` e `examples`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1eaec49c069b9aa7", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:40e4f334d90e", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01589847-3e06-458d-a4cd-3c92b3bacc19"}}
{"id": "01e7b6244c75aca4", "prompt": "Explain the implementation of `AxiosError` in `lib/core/AxiosError.js`. Specifically, how does it capture the request and response objects when an error occurs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "01e7b6244c75aca4", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:3e160beac5ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe8f1cef-162f-46ae-8715-d3ca0a3bf557"}}
{"id": "f9ad99d281b257e6", "prompt": "where's the HTTP adapter code located? specifically the part that handles the response interceptor chain.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f9ad99d281b257e6", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:5ddd677918f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0c5cbcc-63f3-4642-872f-6cb88d1ea157"}}
{"id": "f3a1e85b55cf8e9a", "prompt": "Check `lib/adapters/xhr.js` and tell me how it dispatches the progress events to the caller. I'm seeing some weirdness with the `loadend` event.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f3a1e85b55cf8e9a", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:02fd36b9f3c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c342cab4-f890-49f9-8cc3-70ecf1ad3340"}}
{"id": "e6134cbcfdcaa3b1", "prompt": "I need to verify the exact HTTP response headers returned by the Axios documentation site at https://axios-http.com/. Specifically, I'm looking for the Strict-Transport-Security header to ensure the site enforces HTTPS properly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the site redirect www to non-www?"}, {"prompt": "What is the Cache-Control max-age value set to?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e6134cbcfdcaa3b1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:f7d57b9be917", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d458e2f-1b73-4a81-87b1-677b8a1b9608"}}
{"id": "074405109286a2d7", "prompt": "Hello, the `combineURLs` helper in `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` is stripping trailing slashes incorrectly when merging a baseURL that ends with `/` and a relative URL that is just `/api/v1`. It results in `/api/v1` instead of `/api/v1/` if the intent was to preserve structure. Here is the test case that fails:\n`combineURLs('http://example.com/api/', '/')` should return `http://example.com/api/`. Fix this edge case.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Good catch on the edge case with empty strings too. Don't break the basic concatenation though."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "074405109286a2d7", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:cb8c261c476b", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6baa110e-d3e4-4eb5-9975-9f9f869787f8"}}
{"id": "22595c93952c0252", "prompt": "can you look at the current version of `js-yaml` in package.json and see if there's a major version bump available? if so, tell me what's likely to break in our config loading.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22595c93952c0252", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:43fdbcf0c7d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d0499c0-c9aa-4dbc-84a3-b3faa4d625e5"}}
{"id": "1a7f5073f99b3228", "prompt": "The MIGRATION_GUIDE.md is outdated regarding the recent runtime alignment fixes. Update it to explain how request handling differs across runtimes (fetch vs xhr) in v1.x.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1a7f5073f99b3228", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axios:fa045a228fa3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "569f1b16-6a63-4951-97e4-173a3750f78d"}}
{"id": "bb8040c4461e5250", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how axios handles cancellation in the current version. Is CancelToken still the recommended way, or are we supposed to use AbortController? Also, does the library automatically handle the abort signal if I pass it in the config?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How do I check if a request was cancelled in the catch block?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bb8040c4461e5250", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:e983eef678ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "121209cb-f5f7-4c55-99e2-1f71c2fb66fd"}}
{"id": "c869f675ecb8fa97", "prompt": "I'm looking for the implementation of `combineURLs`. Where is that function defined and which parts of the codebase call it for building request URLs?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a unit test for `combineURLs`?"}, {"prompt": "Does it handle trailing slashes in the base URL?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c869f675ecb8fa97", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:a412c1b100b8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13ff2fe4-fc70-4265-b8cf-172a5c6b5691"}}
{"id": "a17736ababfb52b9", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit. It included some debug logs in `lib/helpers/isURLSameOrigin.js` that shouldn't be there. Can you undo the last commit but keep my changes so I can clean them up?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I removed the logs. Now commit it properly using conventional commits."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a17736ababfb52b9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:39b5de9bee74", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1fa0098b-15cc-4bd6-8ad1-5588ff3f47de"}}
{"id": "f9ee74cc3ad75007", "prompt": "Wait for the local development server to be ready. Once you see 'Server listening on port 3000' in the logs, let me know so I can trigger the integration tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f9ee74cc3ad75007", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axios:405cb5dcea78", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65410a0a-6480-4569-ac4f-38082d0f33e1"}}
{"id": "cf8e279de6e4c73d", "prompt": "Rename the function `estimateDataURLDecodedBytes` to `getDecodedDataURLBytes` in `lib/helpers/estimateDataURLDecodedBytes.js` and update all its references in the repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cf8e279de6e4c73d", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axios:b937e5131cb4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a4af128-49f5-4b2c-98fa-10967bb57cf3"}}
{"id": "178a2a46f2283464", "prompt": "The recent fix for `methodList` and `dispatchRequest` seems to have introduced some edge case failures in the browser environment. \n- Investigate `tests/browser/requests.browser.test.js` and see why certain method combinations are failing.\n- Check `lib/core/methodList.js` to see if the mapping is missing any standard HTTP verbs used in modern fetch implementations.\n- Verify if `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` is correctly utilizing the `methodList` when determining if a request should be handled by the XHR or Fetch adapter.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "178a2a46f2283464", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axios:0fd4b84e8f7e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d26dc7d-8c0b-4532-a0a3-b1a585a6be3d"}}
{"id": "a20ab60673728354", "prompt": "scan the whole repo for any hardcoded secrets or API keys. I saw some config files in `tests/smoke/` and `examples/` that might have leaked credentials during debugging. Please list any false positives too so I don't ignore them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a20ab60673728354", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axios:cac11049dbc3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9797294e-0459-4dcf-adab-c87823341cb2"}}
{"id": "64cee12c8e6eac82", "prompt": "Kannst du `lib/core/InterceptorManager.js` und die Adapter (`xhr.js`, `http.js`) dahingehend refaktorieren, dass das Chain-Pattern nicht mehr auf rekursiven `reduce` Calls basiert, sondern auf einer expliziten Iteration? Die aktuelle Implementierung ist schwer zu debuggen. Die Signatur von `axios.interceptors.request.use` darf sich nicht ändern, das ist part of the public API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "64cee12c8e6eac82", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axios:fc047218484c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13ab93e8-491f-496c-8a21-83667fe751c7"}}
{"id": "2acdbc98b3284a86", "prompt": "Liste todas as branches locais que começam com 'feature/'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2acdbc98b3284a86", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axios:ce753c70c459", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40351567-ef06-4913-8c86-6e6b91cd7a76"}}
{"id": "86e22a98781a8b36", "prompt": "Run `npm run build` and let me know if it completes successfully. If there are any warnings or errors, paste them here.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, how many lines of code are we looking at in the main lib/src folder now?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "86e22a98781a8b36", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:f2465171ca69", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da17ae11-83f2-4eec-a482-b060b97c3a31"}}
{"id": "4c0f90bb4e8d35c9", "prompt": "Fix the race condition in `lib/cancel/CancelToken.js`.\n\nIf I cancel a request and immediately create a new one with the same token source, the second request gets cancelled too.\n\nThis is happening because `source.token` is shared state incorrectly or not reset properly. Here's the reproduction:\n\n```javascript\nconst source = axios.CancelToken.source();\n\nconst p1 = axios.get('/data', { cancelToken: source.token });\ndelay(10).then(() => source.cancel());\n\n// p1 is cancelled immediately.\n// p2 should NOT be cancelled, but it is.\nconst p2 = axios.get('/data2', { cancelToken: source.token });\n```\n\nPlease ensure that cancelling a token only affects in-flight requests that were active at the time of cancellation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c0f90bb4e8d35c9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axios:8f0318621a8f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65c7ce9a-18cd-443a-89bf-676759e80363"}}
{"id": "6ba6c8d77aef46d1", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js`? I want to know how it handles base URLs and relative paths.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6ba6c8d77aef46d1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axios:fe4eefb17cdb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8700cc2b-b945-4259-9dcc-16ce20f670a4"}}
{"id": "4b9197ab24d65a09", "prompt": "check package.json and see if we can bump vitest to the latest version. also check if there are any breaking changes in recent versions that might affect our current test suite in tests/unit", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b9197ab24d65a09", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axios:85d12490c476", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65db5875-da85-4475-8c19-f02953d9e977"}}
{"id": "214a27959feab5ea", "prompt": "I'm getting an error when trying to use the progress event reducer:\n\n`ProgressEventReducer is not a function`\n\nLooking at `lib/helpers/progressEventReducer.js`, the export seems correct. I checked the Axios documentation on their website, but it doesn't mention this helper specifically. Can you look up the official Axios documentation to see if this helper is documented anywhere? Also, are there any tests that use this function to understand the expected usage?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you check if there's a missing export in the main index file?"}, {"prompt": "Look for any usage of `progressEventReducer` in the test files."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "214a27959feab5ea", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:450c47909da4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8318372-13e2-4642-ba81-0ce455743441"}}
{"id": "744ec8e8a90a6732", "prompt": "Is the NPM registry down? I'm trying to run `npm install` locally but it keeps timing out. Check https://www.npmjs.com/ and let me know if the site is loading correctly for you.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if there are any ongoing incidents on the NPM status page."}, {"prompt": "Try to ping the npm registry API directly and see if it responds."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "744ec8e8a90a6732", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axios:349a2f29a820", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d9d645c-089d-4cc4-b035-66e074f49887"}}
{"id": "d274ec8b232218b9", "prompt": "where is the `composeSignals` helper actually used? I'm debugging an issue with aborted requests and need to see the call sites.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d274ec8b232218b9", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axios:f90aec7c6743", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a03b3342-6da1-4c85-8a4c-ece1e1425b99"}}
{"id": "f2d8950924e07875", "prompt": "I've been working on a fix for `lib/helpers/combineURLs.js` but it's a mess. Can you look at my current changes, split them into two logical commits (one for the fix and one for updated tests), and then commit them?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f2d8950924e07875", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axios:160d2127095b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "686ed9c2-7c8e-4194-8425-4cd315dce56f"}}
{"id": "90ee948eb0c54b52", "prompt": "I'm seeing some build artifacts in the root directory that shouldn't be tracked. Please check if lib/dist or build folders exist and add them to .gitignore if they aren't already, but be careful not to ignore files that are actually part of the release bundle.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "90ee948eb0c54b52", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axios:294867886074", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0bb5b4e-431f-4ec6-bd0d-af190e7dadd5"}}
{"id": "e94ea1cf9ba5d962", "prompt": "Preciso verificar qual é a versão estável mais recente do Axios para usar como referência em um PR de atualização de dependência interna. Pode me passar o link da página releases no GitHub ou do npmjs para eu comparar com o versionamento semântico que estamos usando hoje?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e94ea1cf9ba5d962", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axios:835cfce25ba6", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "760fc804-17e0-4359-a56c-e7d48a178203"}}
{"id": "c07c993526bbe4f1", "prompt": "I see there's a lib/core/dispatchRequest.js file. Can you walk me through the flow of how a request is dispatched? Specifically, when do interceptors run relative to the adapter?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c07c993526bbe4f1", "repo": "axios", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axios:bca38056da8d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axios-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e45d8b1-7bd1-4a53-9f34-f7102c37ceed"}}
{"id": "a7459db4b2acfb04", "prompt": "In the SSE example, where is the Event structure defined? I want to add a custom field to the stream.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7459db4b2acfb04", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:978390e689b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eaa71994-90cc-427e-b041-4c11118019b0"}}
{"id": "e86db459f397f8b3", "prompt": "In `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs`, we have a custom deserializer. I noticed that `axum/src/json.rs` uses the standard serde_json deserializer. \n\nI want to unify the error handling behavior. Can you update `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs` to return the same rejection type as `axum/src/json.rs` when deserialization fails? \n\nAlso, check `axum-extra/src/response/error_response.rs` to see how we format these errors there. The goal is to make `JsonDeserializer` drop-in interchangeable with `Json` in terms of error responses.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e86db459f397f8b3", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:80f491f784fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8bb7587c-6dab-4a17-9e03-fc1f3f53b47e"}}
{"id": "2ee9dafdfa0c35d2", "prompt": "Liste os últimos 5 commits do repositório e me diga se houve alguma mudança recente relacionada ao SSE (Server-Sent Events).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2ee9dafdfa0c35d2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:cebed881a114", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a85b435-93ad-4e31-9b44-df010ab037d1"}}
{"id": "2a4add518d4d22cb", "prompt": "Update axum/src/docs/routing/with_state.md to reflect the changes in the recent commits regarding how state is handled in handlers. Also, add a brief 'Note' section about the new InnerPath extractor if it affects state scoping.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also draft a corresponding entry for the CHANGELOG.md in the axum/ directory?"}, {"prompt": "Make sure to include a code snippet in the documentation showing how to use the new extractor."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2a4add518d4d22cb", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axum:dccae458f7f9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fdfe9d85-5356-44de-a4ea-68c1b02e41f4"}}
{"id": "8428a234e08b3d66", "prompt": "Check if there's a newer version of `tokio` available that we should migrate to. We need to ensure that moving to the latest version won't break the `axum::serve` implementation in `axum/src/lib.rs` or the examples.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If an upgrade is possible, check for any changes in the `TcpListener` handling."}, {"prompt": "Update `examples/hello-world/src/main.rs` to match any new `tokio` patterns if necessary."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8428a234e08b3d66", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:fad9f8a24750", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e568d6b-81f7-48d1-ac72-7af97b09114e"}}
{"id": "228caf47f05e9d2b", "prompt": "Find all `TODO` comments in the `axum` source code. I'm doing a cleanup pass and want to see what's left.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "228caf47f05e9d2b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:1e21cc1fb5bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ffac23e5-dc5b-4c98-9d6a-c6a706fedf1f"}}
{"id": "f0dd1794aaa97746", "prompt": "Just ran `cargo build` on the main axum crate and it's failing with a lint error I can't quite parse. Can you fix the lints? I'm mostly worried about clippy warnings in `axum/src/routing/path_router.rs` and `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs`.\n\nAlso, while you're at it, please run `cargo fmt` to keep things tidy.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you find any other lint issues in `axum-core`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f0dd1794aaa97746", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:fae228f58398", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59473a2f-0838-4cca-877e-d57fa01963a5"}}
{"id": "7d047acdadcb743c", "prompt": "In `axum-extra/src/response/content_disposition.rs`, rename the `set_filename` method to `with_filename` and update all internal usages.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7d047acdadcb743c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:997d303c25b1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a188bea3-57fa-458c-99de-d473a4409a59"}}
{"id": "464018bbf9b06035", "prompt": "I'm looking at `examples/websockets-http2`. It uses self-signed certs. Can you read `self_signed_certs/cert.pem` and `self_signed_certs/key.pem` and just tell me the CN (Common Name) in the certificate and if the private key is encrypted? I just need a quick verification that we aren't committing a password-protected key by accident.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do the same for `examples/low-level-native-tls` to compare."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "464018bbf9b06035", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:baa71d14efbf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2232f897-6627-476f-a09e-313986984d94"}}
{"id": "3a874ff38c7aeaa6", "prompt": "I'm seeing some overhead in our JSON parsing. Check if upgrading `serde_json` would provide any performance improvements or if it would break the `Json` extractor in `axum/src/json.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3a874ff38c7aeaa6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:c278551607e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a3a85f6b-c2f6-4db7-a2cd-8d1504aaecca"}}
{"id": "3ebc84515991a78f", "prompt": "On a des problèmes de performance signalés sur le parsing des corps de requêtes. Peux-tu investiguer et proposer des optimisations sur :\n- `axum/src/extract/multipart.rs` (gestion des buffers)\n- `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs` (overhead de désérialisation)\n- `axum-extra/src/body/async_read_body.rs` (gestion de l'async read)", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Une fois l'investigation terminée, crée des benchmarks dans un nouveau dossier `benches/` pour comparer l'ancienne et la nouvelle approche."}, {"prompt": "Vérifie si l'utilisation de `axum-extra/src/protobuf.rs` est impactée par tes changements de buffering."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ebc84515991a78f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:965e600f494c", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f9592ba-b548-4ce6-8faa-9062ed5555a9"}}
{"id": "b2bdfda91bd42cf6", "prompt": "Router에서 `/api/v1/users` 라우트를 추가하려고 하는데, 미들웨어 체인에서 `State` 추출자가 실패합니다. 에러 로그는 다음과 같습니다:\n\n```\nthread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value', axum/src/extract/state.rs:12:22\nnote: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for more details\n```\n\n함수 시그니처는 다음과 같습니다:\n```rust\nasync fn get_user(State(state): State<AppState>, Path(id): Path<u32>) -> Json<User> { ... }\n```\n\n`Router::with_state`를 사용하지 않고 `Router::new()`로 생성 후 미들웨어로 state를 넣었거든요. 왜 이렇게 되는 걸까요? 고쳐주세요.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "대안으로 `from_ref`를 사용한 방식이 가능한지 비교해서 설명해 줘도 좋습니다."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b2bdfda91bd42cf6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:10e3511e715c", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1755f897-a441-4502-ab37-5480b8b47b51"}}
{"id": "162aba3979475473", "prompt": "Can you fetch the HTTP response headers from https://www.rust-lang.org? Specifically looking for `Strict-Transport-Security`. I want to check if we should be enforcing HSTS in our `axum-extra` middleware.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "162aba3979475473", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:e83a73aa343f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "225ae95a-bf02-43be-83ed-8f6c3d0d489a"}}
{"id": "a28c5b5f20b4d1f7", "prompt": "Delete the `examples/static-file-server/assets/index.html` file since we are moving all static assets to a central directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a28c5b5f20b4d1f7", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:f3d015a11bd0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2a67ef60-ed0a-43f6-8932-415bb25e5d38"}}
{"id": "5df2bb518443dcd9", "prompt": "I've just pushed some changes to the `axum-extra` crate. I'm waiting for the CI to finish. Let me know when the `axum-core` tests pass so I can start working on the next task.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5df2bb518443dcd9", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:e23b22bf902f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f19cfc6-6fd0-4c1f-b2dc-c2238c3796f0"}}
{"id": "6200435b1ffafe1f", "prompt": "Can you explain how the `Router::route` method is implemented in `axum/src/routing/route.rs`? I want to understand how it stores the method and the handler.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does the `get` function in `axum/src/routing/mod.rs` actually wrap the handler?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6200435b1ffafe1f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:e661a96e47e5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ff87b208-2b3b-4d8f-994d-26de35f80e32"}}
{"id": "fae6ec632b8345de", "prompt": "Can you explain how the `Router` routing logic works in relation to `tower::Service`? I see in the README that axum leverages the tower ecosystem for middleware instead of having its own system. Does this mean that custom middleware needs to implement `Service<Request, Response = Response>` directly, or does axum provide any wrappers to make this easier for axum-specific extractors?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fae6ec632b8345de", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:9cb7b2565b06", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d78e51e-848c-4308-921e-92333f182a6a"}}
{"id": "af8572a6571aceb8", "prompt": "How does the `Json` extractor in `axum/src/json.rs` handle deserialization errors? Does it return a specific rejection type?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "af8572a6571aceb8", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:472de8e4f371", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4c438a8f-3f35-4aa3-96d4-ecfa2f448840"}}
{"id": "5fc586a889736037", "prompt": "Nettoyage de la CI et des outils de dev. On doit :\n- Vérifier la configuration de `deny.toml` et s'assurer qu'elle est cohérente avec les nouveaux standards.\n- Mettre à jour les workflows de la CI (si tu vois des patterns suspects dans les commits récents concernant `release-plz`).\n- Vérifier que les fichiers de configuration VSCode dans `contrib/ide/vscode/` sont à jour pour l'équipe.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5fc586a889736037", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:91a87cd790b2", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ac9875c6-3081-469e-8c08-1e8a1a4481de"}}
{"id": "752aaa8ad47cc9f2", "prompt": "Find all places where `InnerPath` is used as an extractor. I want to make sure I haven't broken backward compatibility with some internal code.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Got it. Are there any tests specifically for `InnerPath`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "752aaa8ad47cc9f2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:d2b68df37593", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8efa6e61-5d25-4abd-ba48-ecaa98845497"}}
{"id": "dbd8b5294c0afd5f", "prompt": "check git blame examples/websockets/src/main.rs 的最后一行。我发现最近有个关于 WebSockets HTTP2 的提交好像改动了这个文件，我想确认是不是我误操作导致的。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dbd8b5294c0afd5f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:1fb9d43ec495", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "857e7454-90aa-49b3-a366-c5837ff1211e"}}
{"id": "4411f86c8f159693", "prompt": "I'm looking at `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs`. How does the path extraction logic handle nested paths versus regular segments?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the implementation of `Path<T>` and how it implements `FromRequest`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4411f86c8f159693", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:1ebaa475a238", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e25161b7-e604-46ac-a27e-229ee8b681c4"}}
{"id": "409094f783cf028d", "prompt": "axum-core에서 RequestParts extractor 관련 코드를 살펴봐. `request_parts.rs` 파일이 좀 지저분한데 리팩토링이 필요한 부분이 있는지 분석해 줘.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "분석 결과 중 첫 번째 제안한 리팩토링을 적용해 줘."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "409094f783cf028d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:1853a4841ea7", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "703a3ecd-7066-4320-9e21-3e2cac806a1a"}}
{"id": "23519cc6fcc26982", "prompt": "I'm seeing a deprecation warning in `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs`. Can you check the serde_json documentation for the latest `from_reader` vs `from_bytes` performance characteristics? We're using `from_reader` in the custom extractor in `examples/customize-extractor-error`. I want to make sure we aren't missing out on optimizations available with `Bytes`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Refactor `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs` to use `from_slice` if it's more efficient."}, {"prompt": "Check if this change impacts the `JsonDeserializer` trait interface."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "23519cc6fcc26982", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:e0b550fd1ca9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80a2f324-a571-4bcc-b682-287a3a0d124a"}}
{"id": "8b5ffb0697981b8f", "prompt": "Revisa `axum-macros/tests/from_request/pass/state_via_parts.rs` y dime qué es lo que se está probando exactamente en ese test de macros.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Hay algún caso de error similar que esté cubierto en la carpeta `fail`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b5ffb0697981b8f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:61bb9053eea2", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7781163c-7665-49ca-b233-31794415b789"}}
{"id": "6cca7ff50ac33fb7", "prompt": "Show me the full diff for commit 8b30afb", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6cca7ff50ac33fb7", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:2d1a7f0c0a58", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c955b34e-1485-4e1f-a0f2-33a6795d7ae8"}}
{"id": "0ce5dea9367d0166", "prompt": "We need to improve the robustness of our extractors. Please perform a parallel investigation into:\n\n- `axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs`: check if we are handling missing optional typed headers correctly.\n- `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs`: check for potential performance bottlenecks during large payload deserialization.\n- `axum/src/extract/multipart.rs`: verify that we aren't susceptible to multipart boundary collisions, similar to the recent fix in `axum-extra`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ce5dea9367d0166", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:289b50bf6864", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9359771e-41df-41b4-836b-b8e72d52aede"}}
{"id": "a4192906f463fc5e", "prompt": "Can you check the dependency tree for `tower`? I want to make sure we aren't pulling in multiple conflicting versions of `http` or `hyper` that might cause type mismatches in our middleware.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If there are duplicates, suggest a way to unify them in the root `Cargo.toml`."}, {"prompt": "Check if `axum-extra/src/handler/mod.rs` is affected by any version mismatches."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a4192906f463fc5e", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:dc3e1ac9ccdb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "62ce55f3-5b36-4ebb-a74e-1336956357b7"}}
{"id": "5c4f34d1d18be8d4", "prompt": "Preciso testar o novo extrator `InnerPath` (#3856). Pode rodar apenas o teste específico para ele? Não preciso de toda a suíte agora.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5c4f34d1d18be8d4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:1075336871b3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22487360-3331-432c-aa44-022832bee689"}}
{"id": "42f96148501cbcfd", "prompt": "Check the live status page for Azure App Service and tell me if there are any reported incidents right now. I need to know if this is a service-side issue or something in our Axum deployment.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, since it's an Azure issue, I'll add some logging to our `error_handling/mod.rs` to better distinguish between client errors and upstream provider errors."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "42f96148501cbcfd", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:692c5137fcf0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd68b3fd-d4b2-4880-93a6-bf1fe4bf7c52"}}
{"id": "0fc347d6985d8795", "prompt": "Where is the `ConnectionLimits` struct defined? I need to see its fields.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0fc347d6985d8795", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:8dc199f344ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6098da9-ab52-4708-97fe-97a7a45d4d0e"}}
{"id": "cc94a3982f1528b9", "prompt": "I'm migrating from 0.8.x to the main branch. The README mentions breaking changes. Can you explain the high-level differences in the Router API or extractor logic that I should be aware of?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc94a3982f1528b9", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:abc213cbbd13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2e98a42-55df-42d9-b4d4-ce67dd9af896"}}
{"id": "9214bddb11e8441b", "prompt": "The release-plz actions keep bumping versions in CI. Look at the recent commits for `bump crate-ci/release-plz`. Can you update all `bump crate-ci/release-plz` lines in CI configs or workflows to use the very latest version `0.5.139`? Make sure to double check `deny.toml` or any other config files if they reference release-plz versions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9214bddb11e8441b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:28b3a76afa3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "52d51455-0601-42bb-95cb-aafa58757f68"}}
{"id": "43a8580d3e2a6601", "prompt": "Je voudrais améliorer la robustesse de la gestion des erreurs. Travaille sur ces trois points en parallèle : \n- Étudie `axum/src/error_handling/mod.rs` pour voir comment on pourrait mieux intégrer les rejections personnalisées.\n- Regarde comment `axum-extra/src/response/error_response.rs` pourrait être généralisé.\n- Vérifie si on peut ajouter des tests de régression dans `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/` pour couvrir les cas de retour de types invalides.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43a8580d3e2a6601", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:efed25c2fafe", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04d1bced-9e08-40ad-8f7c-b339b5e1669e"}}
{"id": "4696a9e6fb8eb960", "prompt": "Run the tests for `axum-macros` and fix the failing test in `tests/debug_handler/fail/wrong_return_type.stderr`. The test is expecting a specific error message about returning a tuple, but the current error message is different. \n\nHere is the content of `wrong_return_type.rs`:\n```rust\n#[axum::debug_handler]\nasync fn handler() -> (String, String) {\n    (\"a\".into(), \"b\".into())\n}\n```\n\nAnd the current stderr output is:\n```\nerror[E0277]: the trait bound `String: IntoResponse` is not satisfied\n```\n\nBut the test expects:\n```\nerror: handler returns a tuple\n```\n\nPlease update the macro logic in `axum-macros/src/debug_handler.rs` to detect tuple returns that are not valid `IntoResponse` types and provide a clearer error message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4696a9e6fb8eb960", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:3b9d76202437", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e54245f-9b0a-4e93-a2f9-84ded5a15e72"}}
{"id": "131c33c1d288bb5a", "prompt": "Search for all usages of `typed_path` in the macro tests. I want to see which test files verify the path parsing behavior.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Specifically, I want to check the `fail/catch_all_not_at_end.rs` test case."}, {"prompt": "What is the expected stderr for that failure case?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "131c33c1d288bb5a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:626eb5de25df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53bad4f8-a218-498a-87cd-18901d9d521b"}}
{"id": "69d3572955bf576d", "prompt": "In `axum/src/error_handling/mod.rs`, update the error message in the `InternalError` variant to be more descriptive: 'An internal error occurred while processing the request'", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "69d3572955bf576d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:cf81a2fc8783", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e3bbadd-081b-47ab-ad89-e781ea74e073"}}
{"id": "b419aad6c4fbb7ea", "prompt": "multipart 폼 데이터 파싱 시 파일 크기가 1MB 이상이면 메모리 사용량이 급증해서 OOM이 발생합니다. `axum/src/extract/multipart.rs` 코드를 보면 모든 파일을 메모리에 로드하는 듯한데, 스트리밍 방식으로 변경할 수 있는 방법이 있을까요? 현재 아키텍처 변경 없이 성능만 개선할 수 있는 패치 부탁드립니다.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "`tokio_util::io::StreamReader` 등을 이용해 바디를 스트리밍하는 방식이 가능한지 확인해 주세요."}, {"prompt": "현재 구현체를 수정할 때 public API 변경이 최소한으로 이루어지도록 도와주세요."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b419aad6c4fbb7ea", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:803a4716236f", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb14e08f-2425-4131-b50d-88b9d35e85bf"}}
{"id": "e8ec0cbecc54ff03", "prompt": "Executa o linter (clippy) no crate `axum` todo. Tem gente reclamando de estilo no `src/routing/path_router.rs` e quero garantir que está limpo antes de fazer o PR.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e8ec0cbecc54ff03", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:282ca76ac430", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6703f9eb-56ea-4374-b6d5-db82d3fad6f9"}}
{"id": "1d975c9b0973106b", "prompt": "Find all `TODO` and `FIXME` comments in the codebase. I want a list of files and line numbers. Group them by crate (axum, axum-core, axum-extra, axum-macros) so I can triage them easily.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the files in `axum/src/extract`, specifically check `path/mod.rs` and `multipart.rs` to see if any of the TODOs are related to deprecation warnings."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1d975c9b0973106b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:d17f28c8575e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5203c83a-edea-4571-8731-d41a9d618b04"}}
{"id": "fa55bebe79e0b047", "prompt": "find all TODO comments in the codebase and list them with their file paths", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fa55bebe79e0b047", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:b33f81a4bd32", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a7ca9ae3-c58b-455d-abce-594e833a059b"}}
{"id": "155b2b74da99a20c", "prompt": "Check what changed today in the repo. I remember seeing some PRs merged regarding SSE and connection limits. Can you summarize the diffs for those commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "155b2b74da99a20c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:e6cd1a4a6028", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64952af2-73b3-45b3-b9ed-ed8bc37a9835"}}
{"id": "91a94e674dd84039", "prompt": "Delete the `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/wrong_return_type.stderr` file since we've updated the error message formatting and the old stderr is no longer valid.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "91a94e674dd84039", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:8e17c65caf07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4903ede1-e00e-4d73-b7ee-af2484cfe1d7"}}
{"id": "e74fecaaad2ae32a", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs` but I'm not ready to commit everything yet. Can you stash my current changes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e74fecaaad2ae32a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:f4ffa557d389", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d95ab04-e631-4f97-b8f4-88186c7b932c"}}
{"id": "4efce54236677fb6", "prompt": "Show me a summary of what changed since the last release. I just need the list of commits on the `main` branch that aren't in `v0.8.4`. Focus on feat and fix commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4efce54236677fb6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:6dac399b3f5e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b01b30a6-3ff0-4b31-8d61-8737cb44d4cd"}}
{"id": "7308e6c54ffb733e", "prompt": "Je veux renforcer la couverture de tests sur la partie routing. Peux-tu :\n1. Analyser les tests existants dans `axum/src/routing/tests/`.\n2. Identifier les chemins de code non couverts dans `axum/src/routing/path_router.rs`.\n3. Ajouter des tests unitaires pour les cas de bordure (edge cases) dans `axum/src/routing/route.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7308e6c54ffb733e", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:068531bcca00", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b33aba9b-4937-422e-8b70-9a930c6e277e"}}
{"id": "e1fe5e193c23e34c", "prompt": "axum-macros/tests/from_request/fail/enum_from_request_ident_in_variant.rs 테스트가 실패하는 이유가 뭐야? stderr 파일을 참고해서.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e1fe5e193c23e34c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:3687887f2812", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d5572f7-4d23-4295-8f44-009b26ef0cef"}}
{"id": "54c4ef8f3a7f5e17", "prompt": "Il y a pas mal de dette technique sur les exemples. On va faire un grand ménage : \n1. Mets à jour tous les exemples qui utilisent des versions obsolètes de crates (regarde les `Cargo.toml` dans `examples/`).\n2. Uniformise le formatage des fichiers `.md` dans le dossier `examples/`.\n3. Vérifie que les exemples de documentation dans `axum/src/docs/` sont toujours fonctionnels en essayant de les compiler.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "54c4ef8f3a7f5e17", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:82f505cf75b9", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e84d7e2-26a8-45fc-bfe3-fcd876fc2934"}}
{"id": "a80c6d70a58bccf6", "prompt": "I'm trying to track down a dependency conflict in the examples. Can you parse `examples/Cargo.lock` and tell me all the crates that depend on `tower-http`? For each one, list the version requirement specified in the lock file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a80c6d70a58bccf6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:1b3d8b77b583", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9937ee63-366e-4287-a18a-847bed6b7645"}}
{"id": "12601ec8fcdb994f", "prompt": "O build está falhando com um erro genérico. Segue o output:\n```\nerror[E0432]: unresolved import `axum_core::extract::from_ref`\n```\nAlguém sabe o que houve? A `main.rs` do `axum-extra` ainda referencia isso?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "12601ec8fcdb994f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:e219aa1f585d", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c500046c-741e-47a1-bb39-9ff4219aa8e8"}}
{"id": "0574c5ccc760d283", "prompt": "He visto que `axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs` gestiona las cookies. ¿Podrías detallarme cómo se implementa la extracción de una cookie específica de los headers?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0574c5ccc760d283", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:67d45f96e624", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "870f87d8-1c26-4ed4-bf9a-6de2d50b6b90"}}
{"id": "cd3cd10d1f9ac908", "prompt": "I think we have some build artifacts cluttering up the repo structure. Please check what's currently tracked by git that shouldn't be, specifically looking for `target/`, `*.pyc`, or `node_modules/` directories that might have been accidentally committed. Also, check `.gitignore` to ensure `examples/*/target` is listed if it's missing.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you see any generated documentation files in `axum/src/docs` that look like build outputs, let me know."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cd3cd10d1f9ac908", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:ebbd8b683a35", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc7f2ccf-7573-49db-b9de-140b99c0ee18"}}
{"id": "b3c648966c764e8d", "prompt": "The `Json` extractor is failing with `422 Unprocessable Entity` even though the JSON is valid. The error message says \"missing field `username`\" but the field is present in the request. \n\nRequest body:\n```json\n{\n  \"username\": \"test\"\n}\n```\n\nStruct:\n```rust\n#[derive(Deserialize)]\nstruct CreateUser {\n    username: String,\n}\n```\n\nHandler:\n```rust\nasync fn create_user(Json(payload): Json<CreateUser>) -> String {\n    payload.username\n}\n```\n\nThis is happening in `axum/src/json.rs`. It seems like the deserializer is being called twice? Can you check if `Json` is consuming the body before `FromRequest` is done with it? \n\nActually, I think the issue is in `axum/src/extract/rejection.rs`. The rejection logic might be swallowing the actual error. Can you fix the `JsonRejection` to include the full `serde_json::Error` instead of just a generic message?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b3c648966c764e8d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:942ba27637b1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "462a84b0-73ae-4e93-ae69-c09c80ad55ca"}}
{"id": "53131df1a2585576", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how the SSE Event equality works. Can you find the `impl PartialEq for Event` implementation in the codebase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "53131df1a2585576", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:904e8cbb87e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a20e868d-da1b-4ab3-acb5-0813138fbd09"}}
{"id": "13cb74e215649c38", "prompt": "I'm tracing through the request handling flow and I see `axum_core::extract::request_parts` being used, but I can't figure out which internal axum file actually implements the logic to extract the request parts from the `Request` type. Can you find the definition of the `RequestParts` extractor or wherever it's wired up in `axum::extract`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "13cb74e215649c38", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:624df6627957", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f59a70eb-ee30-4852-91f7-f1a3dee07f15"}}
{"id": "54a84ba0de680167", "prompt": "I'm building a middleware for axum and I want to avoid creating a custom struct just to hold state because that requires implementing Clone or using Arc everywhere. I heard about `FromRef`. Can you explain how I can use the `#[from_ref]` attribute to automatically derive extraction of state for my extractor types without writing manual logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "54a84ba0de680167", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:73e3afcdc2f1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e50d9fcc-c75f-4c9e-a1be-7072459b57a4"}}
{"id": "8bcd2c75e9c57219", "prompt": "Review `axum/src/extract/multipart.rs` for security issues. I'm specifically concerned about buffer exhaustion attacks where a client sends a multipart request with massive boundaries or content-length mismatches. Does the current implementation limit the size of individual parts or the total body size? If not, add a safeguard to reject oversized parts.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check if the boundary parsing in `axum-extra/src/body/async_read_body.rs` could be tricked into reading past the actual body."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8bcd2c75e9c57219", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axum:861b365ca6ec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c784a971-0a0e-4fa3-bb17-de2bb309e616"}}
{"id": "3b2cbbd900dd546d", "prompt": "Where does the rejection for multipart boundary collisions come from? I saw a commit about avoiding collisions (#3804) and need to trace the logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3b2cbbd900dd546d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:7673316dddba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31255c47-1b53-4582-b1fb-58c4ba807860"}}
{"id": "8b0c863d2efebc20", "prompt": "Looking at `axum/src/docs/middleware.md`, I see it mentions using `tower::Service`. How does this differ from a typical 'middleware' stack in other frameworks like Express or Go's Gin? Specifically, how does error handling propagate through tower middleware versus axum extractors?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b0c863d2efebc20", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:c02a68700c67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3cc32a5-8180-423d-88bc-0c977cd8a7bc"}}
{"id": "97d7b9b88dbbb0a6", "prompt": "I think we can add `*.rlib` and `*.d` to `axum/.gitignore`? Or are those already covered by the root `.gitignore`? Please check.\n\nAlso, please clean the build artifacts for `axum-extra` only, I just want to verify a clean build there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97d7b9b88dbbb0a6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:f54e24b9aa8e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f86405c-d384-4381-83da-a9273ff38a63"}}
{"id": "a61bf55cdbb882e2", "prompt": "I'm reviewing the `examples/sse/src/main.rs` implementation before we ship it. Can you fetch the raw HTTP response headers from `https://docs.rs/axum/latest/axum/` and tell me if they are serving `Transfer-Encoding: gzip` or if they are using `Content-Encoding: gzip`? I want to see the exact `Content-Type` header value too.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a61bf55cdbb882e2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:4494182ab7e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e202d111-fcdb-4d7c-84bb-7c85f915af40"}}
{"id": "9753b3a662473442", "prompt": "Triaging findings from a recent SAST scan. It flagged `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/*.rs` as having 'unhandled exceptions' and 'potential injection points'. Since these are compile-time fail tests, these are likely false positives. Please confirm that these files are only used for testing compiler error messages and do not represent runtime paths that could be exploited. If they are safe, ignore them.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "However, please check `axum/src/middleware/from_fn.rs` nearby, as macros often generate unsafe code or bypass checks."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9753b3a662473442", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axum:947c4411c466", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dc4e352f-0764-403c-acc6-dec16514b949"}}
{"id": "4a613569436f7d3e", "prompt": "I just pulled the main branch and saw commit 8aae593 updated cargo-check-external-types. Can you run `cargo deny check` to make sure we don't have any new vulnerabilities or banned crates in the workspace? Specifically check axum, axum-core, and axum-extra.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4a613569436f7d3e", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axum:d54e44eedf62", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5507fb98-fee5-4d0c-8d03-dae0e66f7dba"}}
{"id": "f099f9b3d8fcd8f2", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the 0.9 release. Currently, the `axum/Cargo.toml` is pointing to `0.9.0-dev`. Please bump the version to `0.8.5` in `axum/Cargo.toml`, `axum-core/Cargo.toml`, and `axum-extra/Cargo.toml`. Also, update the version number in `axum-macros/Cargo.toml`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f099f9b3d8fcd8f2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:a4c52bab1f39", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c9c2e4d-763b-4f9d-9138-88997c1fbb3f"}}
{"id": "7ccd990667d90beb", "prompt": "Explain the logic in `axum/src/extract/multipart.rs`. I need to understand how it handles the multipart stream.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ccd990667d90beb", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:266cd8b4ee52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6dea6d3a-479a-4e4f-8e90-34aab4577747"}}
{"id": "4b170831685337b8", "prompt": "The `InnerPath` extractor added in commit bc8d491 (#3856) seems useful for our `examples/versioning` use case. Can you look up the official documentation for `InnerPath`? Specifically, I need to know if it supports optional path segments or if it strictly requires all captured segments to be present. The test cases in `axum-macros/tests/typed_path/pass/` don't seem to cover the optional case.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4b170831685337b8", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:d63dc5605ee8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a5f0758-0da4-4533-a396-6702fe03f1b2"}}
{"id": "aeaaae51e5270ddb", "prompt": "In `axum/src/routing/path_router.rs`, the `Route` insertion logic is getting messy. Specifically around lines 150-200 (assuming I'm looking at the latest main), we manually check for method conflicts.\n\nCan you refactor the method conflict check into a separate helper function `check_method_conflict`? It should take the existing routes and the new method path, and return a `RouteError` if there's a collision.\n\nAlso, look at `axum/src/routing/route.rs` to ensure the `Route` struct fields are accessible for this check.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aeaaae51e5270ddb", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:15a691b17509", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "951aa1f5-da45-4b55-b8fa-cbd88c36e9cf"}}
{"id": "111f0444128f85d9", "prompt": "I'm looking into CVE-2024-21312. Can you find the official Rust Advisory Database entry for it and summarize the impact? I need to know if our current `axum` and `hyper` versions in `Cargo.lock` are vulnerable.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "111f0444128f85d9", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:d35a4d486d55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dd4090c-9645-473e-83a6-17ed2932480b"}}
{"id": "2298eb1d06155b2b", "prompt": "I'm looking for the `ConnectionLimits` middleware. Can you point me to the file where it's defined and explain how it bounds connection lifetime?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2298eb1d06155b2b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:b72e804b0863", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1fdcaf9-9215-4180-abc7-12c5bddc9984"}}
{"id": "85fbdc2342d69eda", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between `axum::routing::Router` and using `Router::new().route()` versus using `into_make_service`. I have a setup where I need to serve multiple origins. When should I use `into_make_service` directly instead of letting axum handle the routing internally? Is this related to `tower::Service`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "85fbdc2342d69eda", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:82652e43446f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85b4c7fc-86cc-4a28-9b45-505649731c46"}}
{"id": "6f1592b15451d809", "prompt": "Run `cargo fmt --all` and `cargo clippy --all-targets` across the entire workspace. If clippy reports any fixable warnings, please apply them directly. I want a clean build without lint errors.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6f1592b15451d809", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:4669b0bba5c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c1e61f60-c81b-4653-9171-3005219d439c"}}
{"id": "3f7122f683eb9a96", "prompt": "The `axum-macros` test suite is getting a bit cluttered. I need you to do a sweep of the `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/` directory. Specifically:\n\n1. Audit all the `.stderr` files to ensure the error messages match our new error-handling guidelines.\n2. Check if `multiple_request_consumers.stderr` and `not_a_function.stderr` are still providing useful diagnostic info for users.\n3. If you find any test cases that are no longer relevant due to the removal of v07 path checks, go ahead and propose their removal.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3f7122f683eb9a96", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:a38fbfbcb848", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6e4dfc7-d642-4357-aedb-76ca25391c41"}}
{"id": "03d8e80e6d28e00f", "prompt": "I just realized I made a typo in the commit message for my last commit. Can you amend it to 'feat: implement InnerPath extractor'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "03d8e80e6d28e00f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:abfab3b3b516", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4c546a4-0b5f-4192-a63f-f3d97fef583d"}}
{"id": "8fcb5108e455baf7", "prompt": "The `InnerPath` extractor added in commit bc8d491 seems to ignore query parameters if there are no path segments left after matching.\n\nHere is the reproduction:\n```rust\n#[derive(Debug, Extractor)]\nstruct InnerPath {\n    #[inner_path]\n    foo: String,\n}\n```\n\nIf I hit `/api/v1/users?foo=bar` and my router is mounted at `/api/v1`, the extractor errors saying it didn't find 'foo', but 'foo' was actually in the query string, not the path.\n\nIs this intended behavior for `InnerPath`? I think it should probably just pass through query params if they aren't consumed by the path extraction.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8fcb5108e455baf7", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:3865c440499d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26cd0271-8ecc-44f1-a51f-dda0536ad3ff"}}
{"id": "67f7c2c7d4a93f9a", "prompt": "run_clippy_fix", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "67f7c2c7d4a93f9a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:0587f8ec3928", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "950f180d-d31b-4bfe-b06a-8a49c2dba464"}}
{"id": "3d3c946e97c50032", "prompt": "cargo test --lib -p axum-macros -- test_debug_handler_pass 실행해 봐. 테스트 결과 알려줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3d3c946e97c50032", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:b1f5ab424834", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1d24b68-21a9-4e44-8ce2-86eaf26c5fae"}}
{"id": "ba6505dc4bd9e475", "prompt": "In the main `axum` crate, where is `InnerPath` defined and what extractors depend on it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba6505dc4bd9e475", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:02c3653a2168", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9a67ddf-d55c-4ffc-baac-83ca4c91c67e"}}
{"id": "b227f74f067498ff", "prompt": "We should consider adding `tracing-appender` to our dev-dependencies to help with better log management in our test environment. Can you see if it's compatible with our current `tracing` setup in `examples/tracing-aka-logging/src/main.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b227f74f067498ff", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:81b0e2a9ee87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bdc35db4-fe6f-49c9-a36c-5195471ad085"}}
{"id": "69c0c0e00278b72d", "prompt": "Check `axum/src/routing/path_router.rs` and see if we can rename the internal variable `segments` to `path_segments` to be more explicit. Do a global search to make sure you catch all references.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "69c0c0e00278b72d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:510488b68b1e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "613964d7-bf6b-434c-aadf-abc0c846bcf4"}}
{"id": "0e8a85411180ae11", "prompt": "I'm seeing warnings about `axum::middleware::from_fn` in my `axum/src/middleware/from_fn.rs` file. The error message mentions `Incompatible types for closure argument`. Can you check the latest Rust nightly release notes or the `tower-http` documentation to see if there were any recent changes to how closures are handled in `Service` traits? It seems like the closure signature might have become stricter.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e8a85411180ae11", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:a9a931fa2613", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bcac4153-0cdc-414a-a25a-c161c1a955e0"}}
{"id": "0a734e4140c0fa94", "prompt": "帮我把 axum-extra 里关于 cookie 提取器的测试跑一下。特别是 extract/cookie/mod.rs 附近的测试用例。我想知道在当前分支上，带 SameSite 属性的 cookie 解析是否还正确。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0a734e4140c0fa94", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:3bb94249bc7f", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a8793ef-389c-4cbb-935c-4ad999207b59"}}
{"id": "1dd5d9b76edc0b61", "prompt": "Write a technical overview for a new 'Architecture' page in the docs. It should explain the relationship between axum-core, axum-macros, and axum-extra, specifically how the macros generate the glue code that allows extractors to work with the tower services.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1dd5d9b76edc0b61", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axum:f0e8f42efd0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "662f3588-0de9-408d-973f-35159eb29d40"}}
{"id": "8889bd910bbf52b0", "prompt": "I need to add a new `SSE` event type handling. Look at `axum::response::sse` (if it's there, or check `axum/src/docs/handlers_intro.md` for clues) and the recent commit `9d18496 feat(sse): add Event::raw for fully custom payloads`. \n\nI want to add a `from_parts` constructor to the `Event` struct that allows setting custom data without cloning the bytes. \n\nFirst, find the `Event` struct definition. Then, check `examples/sse/src/main.rs` to see how it's currently used, so I can ensure the new constructor doesn't break the example.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8889bd910bbf52b0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:75272d9d7988", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e6cd103-010b-482c-90e9-aba63ea8a8da"}}
{"id": "5fdc730202f9c2bc", "prompt": "In `axum-extra/src/response/error_response.rs`, update the default error message to be more descriptive when an error occurs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5fdc730202f9c2bc", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:be01234e16f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4abaabee-83eb-4c78-9f57-d19ab7ed3faa"}}
{"id": "78d917723b454525", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error in the `anyhow-error-response` example. Can you add a comment in `examples/anyhow-error-response/src/main.rs` explaining why we use `anyhow::Error` instead of a custom error type here?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "78d917723b454525", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:fdda7b6660ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8cbec05a-9152-4d38-a365-9f81547b1679"}}
{"id": "d37a994c9577c2f4", "prompt": "Analizza i file che ho modificato e dividi il lavoro in commit logici. Scrivi dei messaggi di commit chiari seguendo le convenzioni del repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d37a994c9577c2f4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:1373449fbac9", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "45be2f12-42fb-4caa-aee3-200f1ce4b829"}}
{"id": "d7971d9e7c83b596", "prompt": "How does the `InnerPath` extractor work? I saw a recent commit mentioning it, so I want to see the implementation in `axum-core`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me how to use it in a handler?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7971d9e7c83b596", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:ad4e671323ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aced3568-b96d-41c3-902a-4a1653535206"}}
{"id": "97edbdc39b6ae1f4", "prompt": "Fix the type error in `axum-extra/src/protobuf.rs`. I'm trying to use `Protobuf` but it won't compile because the `body` module uses `axum_core::response::into_response_parts::ResponseParts` which has changed its visibility or structure in the main axum crate.\n\nError:\n```\nerror[E0432]: unresolved import `axum_core::response::into_response_parts`\n```\n\nIt looks like `into_response_parts` is no longer public in `axum-core/src/response/mod.rs`. Can you update the imports in the extra crate?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ah, it seems `ResponseParts` is now internal. Is there a public API I should use instead?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97edbdc39b6ae1f4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:84c54c71183f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c665d788-0f11-4e85-9157-ccd7c6533b43"}}
{"id": "5576415aec3ae1e5", "prompt": "Puoi aggiungere un test unitario in `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs` per verificare che l'estrazione dei parametri funzioni correttamente con caratteri speciali?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Perfetto, ora crea un nuovo branch chiamato `feat/path-extractor-tests` e fai il commit di questa modifica con un messaggio descrittivo."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5576415aec3ae1e5", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:9403126a7f6c", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d225afce-39c4-488a-88da-c7b9ba3e4c1e"}}
{"id": "d3548d8b91965241", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify axum/src/routing/path_router.rs and what was their commit message?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d3548d8b91965241", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:140397078fd6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a9e9ccf-a19e-43ba-bfed-f14cf564e887"}}
{"id": "83466b80ab777818", "prompt": "Can you update the `create_user` example in the README to use `axum::extract::Json` instead of just `Json` to be more explicit? Also, add a comment explaining that the `User` struct needs to derive `Serialize`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks. Now can you create a new branch called `docs/update-readme-example`, commit this change with a descriptive message, and then push it?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "83466b80ab777818", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:c8fdb4e10710", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d76c5186-2c54-4820-a970-bf1e48842bcd"}}
{"id": "0ce475dcadbf2edf", "prompt": "Find me where the `InnerPath` extractor is actually defined. I need to know which file implements the extract logic.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it implement `FromRequest` or `FromRequestParts`?"}, {"prompt": "Can you show me the implementation of `extract` for that type?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ce475dcadbf2edf", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:83b4330c729a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b0b1f0b-69eb-4ba9-a99f-4fbfde2a0916"}}
{"id": "9b38dd7fc5d36ac6", "prompt": "我想在本地启动一下 chat 这个示例应用。请运行 examples/chat 里的 main.rs。假设我已经配置好了后端数据库连接。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9b38dd7fc5d36ac6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:d8f8eac82765", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2cd27de-8eda-43ba-9cf0-c4305cb5b03c"}}
{"id": "2f1e9481b378f6da", "prompt": "I'm using the `typed_path` macro in `axum-macros`. I defined a path `/users/{id}` and I want to extract a `u64`. If the user sends `/users/not-a-number`, what happens? Does it automatically reject the request with a 400 Bad Request, or do I need to handle the parsing error manually in the handler?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2f1e9481b378f6da", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:e809898f3ee3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4566ecc1-8b7b-42c6-ad66-f0336ddfa29d"}}
{"id": "29fd7bbdf8337d35", "prompt": "We have a failing test in `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/multiple_request_consumers.stderr`. The error message suggests that only one extractor can consume the request body. I want to understand the rationale better. Can you find the section in the axum guide or RFC about \"single request consumer\" and summarize why this restriction exists? We might be able to work around it with `axum_extra::body::async_read_body`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "29fd7bbdf8337d35", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:d4cfc4edae1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ebc3eb0-536f-430e-aca1-e39857936d15"}}
{"id": "8be2bd1caf5e60ec", "prompt": "I have several changes across `axum-extra/src/response/mod.rs` and `axum-extra/src/response/multiple.rs`. Please split these into logical commits with proper messages and commit them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8be2bd1caf5e60ec", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:afbcffa1affa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "38b4c919-693e-4b82-a69a-616a4395503a"}}
{"id": "7a8191d07cbd3b23", "prompt": "Quem foi o último a alterar o arquivo `axum/src/routing/route.rs` e qual foi o motivo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a8191d07cbd3b23", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:d5324e5825b1", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c372d53-16c6-4869-9b62-a5f41abbd25f"}}
{"id": "61419be95c9fdceb", "prompt": "Dê um `git blame` no arquivo `axum/src/handler/service.rs` para entender por que essa lógica de serviço foi implementada dessa forma.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Existe algum comentário no código que explique essa decisão?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "61419be95c9fdceb", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:8be920e49cd2", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d328673-084f-433e-9913-dade105cc17a"}}
{"id": "44e37ba7abafbb4b", "prompt": "En `axum/src/extract/rejection.rs`, ¿cómo se definen los tipos de error que un extractor puede devolver al usuario?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "44e37ba7abafbb4b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:4bc4e5335fc5", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8f93771-4a90-45e3-8128-f67ee768411b"}}
{"id": "878ee846c1522a34", "prompt": "In `axum-extra/src/protobuf.rs`, there's some logic around body buffering. I suspect it's related to this commit: `715e9a8 fix(axum-extra): preserve protobuf body buffering rejections`. Can you read that file and tell me exactly which structs implement `FromRequest` or `IntoResponse` specifically for protobuf? I'm trying to understand the rejection types.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "878ee846c1522a34", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:018761105ece", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b92cff65-560a-4afc-8825-c2a2e77468c7"}}
{"id": "a7af4204735f9a7c", "prompt": "I see `axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs`. How does this crate's cookie extractor differ from the standard way of handling cookies in `axum-core`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7af4204735f9a7c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:a7ed7a6e6107", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05fb7798-9b44-4187-834d-33c70125c92b"}}
{"id": "bd761c561cb03953", "prompt": "In `axum-macros/src/lib.rs`, how does the procedural macro for `#[debug_handler]` perform its validation of handler arguments? I'm curious how it detects if an argument is not an extractor.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bd761c561cb03953", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:b1631af590c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6da10505-a007-4e01-b40b-14d46a0aa520"}}
{"id": "a52449c51403d804", "prompt": "The commit `b14732f fix(axum-extra): handle missing optional typed headers (#3886)` mentions a fix for optional headers. How does `axum-extra`'s typed header handling work internally? Is it using the `FromRequest` trait?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a52449c51403d804", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:6ff3888782f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b39fc15-2b27-4059-a3d8-2a385d935a0d"}}
{"id": "7c9b9dba0fc7a406", "prompt": "I'm getting a compile error in `axum-macros` when I try to use `#[derive(FromRequest)]` on an enum. The error mentions `generic_without_via`. It seems like I can't use generics on enums unless I specify a `via` parameter. Why is the macro so strict about generics in enums compared to structs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7c9b9dba0fc7a406", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:da4c74d55f50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e976175f-49ce-4d17-935e-fd4c76716055"}}
{"id": "d001a51721eb3ebe", "prompt": "I'm stuck. I've been waiting for the local postgres container for the `examples/diesel-postgres` example to be ready for 5 minutes. Check if the database is up and reachable.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d001a51721eb3ebe", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:5641d4ac3695", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b515aa7f-3eb8-43f4-9e25-4f7bf7fc8f67"}}
{"id": "2e26341090346d38", "prompt": "Hey, I'm trying to audit our dependencies and I noticed `deny.toml` in the root. Can you parse this file and list out all the crates that are currently marked as `deny = true` or `deny = { reasons = ... }`? I need a simple list of their names and the reason provided for each.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, check `Cargo.lock` in the `examples` directory to see if any of those denied crates are actually present there, even transitive dependencies."}, {"prompt": "Now do a similar check for the main `axum` crate's `Cargo.toml` to ensure no new features might pull in those denied crates."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2e26341090346d38", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:76d04b30f22c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66f71b48-1bd3-473c-8319-8bf75fb3fd9b"}}
{"id": "6af7d8321e64c602", "prompt": "sse (Server-Sent Events) Handler에서 Event가 제대로 전송되지 않습니다. `examples/sse/src/main.rs`를 기반으로 테스트 중인데, 브라우저 콘솔에서 `EventSource` 연결은 성공했지만 `message` 이벤트가 오지 않습니다. 코드 내부에서 `sse::Event` 객체를 생성할 때 데이터 인코딩 로직에 버그가 있는 것 같은데, `axum-extra` 쪽의 SSE 관련 코드를 확인해주세요. 특히 `Content-Type: text/event-stream` 헤더 설정 여부가 중요합니다.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "테스트용 클라이언트 스크립트를 짜서 연결 상태를 확인해 보는 코드를 예시로 보여줄 수 있나요?"}, {"prompt": "헤더 설정 문제가 아니라면, 스트림 종료 로직(`data: \\n\\n`)을 확인해 주세요."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6af7d8321e64c602", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:c3665c7d382c", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ddf61ee7-f6b6-4ba9-b3b1-d3d6a34fa93b"}}
{"id": "b9b35de962b93089", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `axum-macros/tests/from_request/pass/tuple.rs` that verifies a handler can take a tuple containing both a `State` and a `Json` extractor.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b9b35de962b93089", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:eae4af36d589", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a7a4fd5e-63db-419b-b68f-40f64cdf946a"}}
{"id": "7cc3a045a6fc9c34", "prompt": "In `axum-core/src/extract/option.rs`, there is an implementation for `Option<T>` where T implements `FromRequest`. How does this affect the rejection type? If the inner extractor fails vs if the header is missing, are the errors handled differently?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7cc3a045a6fc9c34", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:aebb6c9b4e9d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9baf4b70-e803-41d5-ba1d-fa45338ed5e3"}}
{"id": "216f26bfbe873b55", "prompt": "The `SSE` response in `axum/src/response/sse.rs` is dropping data when the client disconnects mid-stream. We're seeing \"Broken pipe\" errors in our logs and the client gets cut off abruptly without a proper close event. \n\nCan you look at `Sse::new` and the `Stream` implementation to ensure we handle `Poll::<Result::Ready(Err(...))>` correctly and stop the stream cleanly?\n\nHere is the stack trace:\n```\nthread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: BrokenPipe (os error 32)', src/main.rs:42:22\n```\n\nWe need to ensure the stream yields the appropriate error or terminates gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "216f26bfbe873b55", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:c4ce128b2909", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ffcc9a7-079c-402c-b118-96af6c0585bf"}}
{"id": "6ba74c5803dd8109", "prompt": "Where is the CRLF handling for SSE lines implemented? I saw a commit about treating CRLF as a single line ending but I need the specific code block.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6ba74c5803dd8109", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:1370922f5bdf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe2467e1-312b-4368-b4c6-9e6af1add485"}}
{"id": "8d2ce42e5650ea4c", "prompt": "where is the rejection type for the Json extractor defined? I need to understand why my custom serialization error isn't being handled correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8d2ce42e5650ea4c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:af74246a0597", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "82ff953b-721c-4f3b-beb2-6dcc024da3b9"}}
{"id": "1e5a080467213c78", "prompt": "Explain the flow of a request through `axum/src/middleware/from_fn.rs`. How does the `from_fn` utility transform a regular async function into a `tower::Layer`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e5a080467213c78", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:2905195bfe99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3fc0909-b48d-49e3-b7ad-2e232de23b75"}}
{"id": "b7b68b2e9b8319db", "prompt": "I'm getting a compile error in `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs` when using the `Path` extractor with a struct that has a single unnamed field. The compiler says the struct doesn't implement `FromRequest`. Can you check the `Path` extractor logic for tuple structs and fix it? Here is the error:\n\n```\nerror[E0277]: the trait bound `MyPath: FromRequest` is not satisfied\n  --> src/main.rs:10:14\n   |\n10 |     async fn handler(path: Path<MyPath>) -> &'static str {\n   |                     ^^^^ the trait `FromRequest` is not implemented for `MyPath`\n```\n\nMy struct looks like:\n```rust\n#[derive(Deserialize)]\nstruct MyPath(String);\n```", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b7b68b2e9b8319db", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:a678f77ec940", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aeef95e7-4331-46b1-9201-256e1a596e6f"}}
{"id": "bebe9346ce125512", "prompt": "I'm trying to use the TypedPath feature from `axum_extra::routing` but I keep getting a compile error about `serde::Serialize` not being implemented. I know `axum-macros` has a `typed_path` module. Could you check the latest docs on crates.io for `axum-extra` to see if `TypedPath` requires the inner type to also implement `serde::Serialize` for the path generation, or is it just `serde::Deserialize` for the handler?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Got it. Does the macro also generate a method to convert the TypedPath into a `http::Uri` automatically?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bebe9346ce125512", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:ec025496b2ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ffd028b-13d6-426e-82fc-9d7d7b8e8532"}}
{"id": "486321d5d9a91948", "prompt": "list all branches that have been modified in the last 2 weeks", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "486321d5d9a91948", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:4a9ab6db3fd0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "25d0b1a2-860b-409b-ba8d-cd5db17c6f33"}}
{"id": "0d0eb5e893110b2a", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the `InnerPath` extractor mentioned in commit bc8d491. Is this extractor designed to capture only a specific segment of a path without capturing the rest of the URL, or does it behave differently from `Path<T>`? I want to use it for a sub-router but I'm not sure if it handles the nesting prefix automatically.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d0eb5e893110b2a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:2c9e0c74c7d0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "03977722-000c-4bd1-af49-a32174fa93a1"}}
{"id": "fc44530960581da9", "prompt": "I need to undo the last commit because it broke the build. Revert it for me.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fc44530960581da9", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:3f09e04559fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1c8ad86-cf63-4d46-bcd7-dda9492e7041"}}
{"id": "c656fe566048984a", "prompt": "Scan the `examples/` directory for any hardcoded secrets, API keys, or passwords. I suspect the `examples/low-level-native-tls` or `examples/jwt` examples might have hardcoded tokens or keys that shouldn't be in the repo. Please list any findings and suggest removing them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c656fe566048984a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axum:7860ec216e13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "292b4946-50ed-44bc-8a58-388916cbc71a"}}
{"id": "4236bfe71194dd19", "prompt": "Ho fatto un po' di modifiche in `axum-extra/src/response/error_response.rs` ma non sono ancora pronte. Salvale temporaneamente nello stash.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4236bfe71194dd19", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:7a19380c6280", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4020e8f8-8885-427b-8f17-8f678e9faa42"}}
{"id": "0f4f6b4b252627bf", "prompt": "Check `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs`. I need to know which methods are exported there and if they are re-exported in the main crate.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Which modules in `axum` re-export this?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0f4f6b4b252627bf", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:1a258565dffb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e6f9e4c-7977-497b-b518-10225b585061"}}
{"id": "8f3544543947c9e0", "prompt": "Explícame la implementación de `axum::routing::path_router.rs`. ¿Cómo se encarga de hacer el match de las rutas con los parámetros?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8f3544543947c9e0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:abb330accd31", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09556d21-c162-4952-917c-3b92ca1abdaa"}}
{"id": "4d3bf7521e43e0d4", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/pass/` that verifies a handler with a single `Result` argument works correctly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also add a corresponding failure test in the `fail` directory for when the result is not from an extractor?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4d3bf7521e43e0d4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:a2a176f1d073", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ea3d654-3ab8-491a-b28d-c18204681619"}}
{"id": "2633891ea6c968ac", "prompt": "Rename the `root` function in `examples/hello-world/src/main.rs` to `hello_world_handler` and update the call site in `main`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2633891ea6c968ac", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:4f2a500ed654", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8cd75b16-722d-4c8d-9ab2-cbaebd79e15e"}}
{"id": "29c982418aa5d347", "prompt": "C'è un errore critico nel commit `bc8d491`. Per favore, fai il revert di quel commit e assicurati che il repository torni allo stato precedente.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "29c982418aa5d347", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:2b18af7365b0", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ed1ffff-e835-48f7-954d-428d4c102d9b"}}
{"id": "82b045270e621d76", "prompt": "Rename the `route_service` function in `axum/src/docs/routing/layer.md` to `layer_service` to match the new naming convention we discussed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "82b045270e621d76", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:64c5f95949e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75df0e08-dd95-4d83-82ad-83f84a5088ff"}}
{"id": "287638868f681120", "prompt": "Run a cargo audit on the workspace. We need to make sure none of our current dependencies have published security vulnerabilities, especially in the `axum-extra` crate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "287638868f681120", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:e3e892a8daad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "074ad73c-8434-42b0-9a11-e02413b6fc61"}}
{"id": "6182d8637decacef", "prompt": "Check `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/wrong_return_type.stderr`. The expected error message says \"expected a tuple\", but actually the error is about \"expected IntoResponse\". The test expectation seems stale.\n\nAlso, `axum-macros/tests/typed_path/fail/catch_all_not_at_end.rs` is failing to compile with a generic error that doesn't mention 'catch_all'. Can we improve the diagnostics in `axum-macros/src/typed_path.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6182d8637decacef", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:9eb452bf2e12", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb40d033-e1ff-41d1-bf5e-0968519bc369"}}
{"id": "c24cc1fb71613194", "prompt": "I'm debugging a middleware issue. Can you locate the `TraceLayer` documentation link update commit? I want to see which file contains the actual middleware definition that was linked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c24cc1fb71613194", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:351fe700125f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3f14eef-79ad-4366-9f15-9172411095e6"}}
{"id": "4408721fa76003ba", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird error in `axum/src/routing/path_router.rs`. Can you add a `TODO` comment near the path segment matching logic indicating that we need to investigate how it handles trailing slashes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4408721fa76003ba", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:e4eec3dd3b73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d3e19ef2-d8c0-4691-b16e-a98fd0d327ae"}}
{"id": "85207af73d82bc67", "prompt": "Quais foram as mudanças feitas no `axum-extra` entre o commit `715e9a8` e o `b8b30afb`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "85207af73d82bc67", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:54679d416088", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa9fed74-2891-4522-b700-3225cb49bfb6"}}
{"id": "be5deda5291a92a1", "prompt": "I'm cleaning up the `axum-core` extractor traits. In `axum-core/src/extract/from_ref.rs` and `axum-core/src/extract/option.rs`, we're manually implementing `FromRequest` wrappers that just delegate to an inner type. \n\nCan you refactor this into a generic macro or helper function that takes the wrapper struct and the inner type, and generates the `FromRequest` impl? I want to remove the boilerplate for any new extractors added here.\n\nPlease check `axum-core/src/lib.rs` to see where these are exported and ensure the new helper is internal.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "be5deda5291a92a1", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:2af8655fa4ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e890551-192c-4cf3-85ed-c5bd64f1c4bc"}}
{"id": "0199ea2ae7f8c3f4", "prompt": "The macro tests in `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/` are growing tedious. \n\nLook at `multiple_paths.stderr`, `wrong_return_type.stderr`, and `not_a_function.stderr`. They all follow a similar pattern of checking for specific compiler error messages.\n\nCan you write a script or update the test harness to use `trybuild` consistently for all fail cases? I want to replace the manual `.stderr` file matching with a more robust check. \n\nCheck `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/pass/` to see how the pass cases are currently structured so I can align the fail cases similarly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0199ea2ae7f8c3f4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:aafcf3e907f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c255b12-4f4b-4aa4-9ab9-7c2ba886ed61"}}
{"id": "5a6880f56460535c", "prompt": "I need to modify `axum/src/extract/path/mod.rs` to support a new segment type that ignores case. Currently, `Path` extractor is case-sensitive for path parameters. \n\nI want to add a `#[derive(Debug, Path)]` struct that has a flag to make the matching case-insensitive. Let me know if this fits the architectural direction of Axum or if I should implement it as a separate wrapper type.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5a6880f56460535c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:68ca42b13d27", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ffb4f48a-786f-4764-9431-489bdb4ec0ac"}}
{"id": "46e4e840863857bf", "prompt": "Quiero entender el flujo de un middleware en `axum/src/middleware/from_fn.rs`. ¿Cómo logra envolver el servicio original?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Qué diferencia hay con usar un `tower::Layer` directamente?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "46e4e840863857bf", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:01ad5570aa75", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "208f8dcd-e7e9-4d09-a59a-86b93a5efb96"}}
{"id": "ed4940cde31062a0", "prompt": "Add a unit test to `axum-core/src/extract/option.rs` to ensure that the `Option` extractor correctly handles cases where the extractor fails for the inner type.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ed4940cde31062a0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:6a7d4d92150b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4cb3e3db-363d-492a-8400-fd8c45ca61b6"}}
{"id": "692b8a176fdbec2b", "prompt": "The error message I'm getting is `no rule named `json` found in crate json`. I'm using `axum::Json`. I checked the `axum/src/json.rs` file and it re-exports `serde_json::Value`. Can you look up the `serde_json` documentation online? I'm confused why the macro isn't resolving. Is `axum` expecting a specific version of `serde_json`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "692b8a176fdbec2b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:b2f3abede6bd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f0d6ea1-dacc-411b-8db8-48c4c8041a6d"}}
{"id": "8e354bcd473838ba", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the `examples/websockets/src/main.rs` but I think the port is already taken. Can you find any processes running on port 3000 and tell me how to kill them?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now that the port is free, run the websocket example again."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8e354bcd473838ba", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:3e09281149c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd36c2be-5a5c-4df8-b383-5c6ba93e0a81"}}
{"id": "809837f820137ed6", "prompt": "Check axum/src/routing/path_router.rs. Specifically, where is the logic that validates if a route starts with a slash? I see in the recent commits (7c3c678) there was a removal of v07 path checks. I want to see if this validation still exists or where the error `route_not_starting_with_slash` originates from in the macro tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "809837f820137ed6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:93f7b9b283d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "854ec64d-3358-4534-abdf-b27cf1485648"}}
{"id": "b5f402bd9f418767", "prompt": "Add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md in the root directory for the latest version. Include the addition of the InnerPath extractor and the new SSE Event capabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b5f402bd9f418767", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axum:ea8e2db2ae73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48051596-85b2-47b8-ae42-79d0cfc5323b"}}
{"id": "8c2ab9fe5fb816f5", "prompt": "Which file handles the error rejection for multipart boundary collisions? I need to find where that logic lives.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8c2ab9fe5fb816f5", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:9ecbb5374c5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37797875-2549-44be-9561-5a3381109b88"}}
{"id": "4ffdd64df86c9ba5", "prompt": "The docs for `axum::extract::State` say it implements `FromRef` to extract state. I see `extract/from_ref.rs` in `axum-core`. Can you look up the official `tower::Service` documentation to confirm if the `State` extractor relies on `tower::util::Oneshot` or `tower::util::MapService` under the hood? I want to make sure my custom middleware doesn't conflict with it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4ffdd64df86c9ba5", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:ac5dd79d1ed9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "020ed29d-c880-4cf6-a1e7-207af63a9128"}}
{"id": "483a7ffb232fc675", "prompt": "The current documentation for SSE in axum/src/docs doesn't mention the CRLF fix. Please update the relevant docs to explain that CRLF is now treated as a single SSE line ending to improve compatibility.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if axum-extra needs any documentation updates regarding the protobuf body buffering rejections mentioned in the commits."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "483a7ffb232fc675", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axum:e72b0a208ac0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37dce2f4-8132-489b-bb21-13c27a605ceb"}}
{"id": "1c7a0912c05c1961", "prompt": "Hey, just saw commit bc8d491 \"feat: add InnerPath extractor\". Does the official Tokio rustls GitHub repo have any recent open issues or CVEs related to certificate validation in the last 30 days? Just need a quick sanity check before we bump our TLS dependencies in `examples/low-level-rustls`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1c7a0912c05c1961", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:7aa0b42f53c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc920986-baf1-4a08-8b02-a5faf4e33eaf"}}
{"id": "753acf44939edfe4", "prompt": "I need a random 32-character hex string to use as a `SESSION_SECRET` in my local `.env` file for testing the JWT examples. Can you generate one?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "753acf44939edfe4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:9ad9646e3e0a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3dd52b53-5a4e-40d0-91d8-b8626c7e65ea"}}
{"id": "34cfd1ec3b718ece", "prompt": "Find me all usages of `tower::Service` in the `axum/src/routing` directory. I'm trying to understand how the router bridges axum handlers to the tower ecosystem.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "34cfd1ec3b718ece", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:ca1be5733623", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66a6fafa-cd31-4607-8919-053ec1b8ee19"}}
{"id": "c85d6427657b8b4c", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing a panic in `axum-extra/src/response/multiple.rs` when I try to return an empty list of responses in a multiplexed route. It looks like `into_response_parts` is being called on an empty iterator but expects at least one element to set default headers.\n\nStack trace:\n```\nthread 'main' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the len is 0', axum-extra/src/response/multiple.rs:42:31\nstack backtrace:\n   0: rust_begin_unwind\n   ...\n```\n\nCan we add a check for empty vectors and return an empty 200 response instead?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks, that looks good. Do we need a test case for this in `axum-extra`?"}, {"prompt": "No need, I'll add the test."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c85d6427657b8b4c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:1eba5d9b2ca5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5116302-e10b-410d-97df-e2289258e965"}}
{"id": "6d60567eb00792fc", "prompt": "Can you check if the `axum-macros` tests are passing? I want to make sure my recent changes didn't break the `from_request` macro logic before I proceed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6d60567eb00792fc", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:b1c2e9c9e1d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40ebc3c6-abc1-4a71-8b1d-302b86e93780"}}
{"id": "d5abdc01c8fb92c0", "prompt": "Looking at `axum-extra`, there's a `JsonDeserializer` extractor. I've been manually deserializing JSON using `serde_json::from_slice(request.body().bytes().await.unwrap())` which is verbose. How does `JsonDeserializer` improve on this, specifically regarding error handling and the rejection types?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d5abdc01c8fb92c0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:349acf79b7d9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2470210e-8229-44c8-a313-b0e8119e64ed"}}
{"id": "cc152eb7d570fd63", "prompt": "我在写一个基于 SSE 的服务，参考了 examples/sse 目录下的代码。但是我遇到一个问题：当客户端断开连接时，服务端并没有及时释放资源。能帮我看看 axum-extra/src/response 里的相关实现，或者 examples/sse/src/main.rs 里的逻辑，有没有什么明显的内存泄漏风险？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cc152eb7d570fd63", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:2f72cc6055a8", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "625bf3c3-584c-491b-ae06-095b9c5c9257"}}
{"id": "09e8d14d6b7c6ea0", "prompt": "I need to verify the current version of `tokio` released to crates.io. Can you check the crates.io page for `tokio` and tell me the latest version? I suspect we might be running a slightly outdated one in our `axum` dependencies.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "09e8d14d6b7c6ea0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:9048e0f44824", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c7b855c2-3d25-4d80-be27-2e076cb90d0d"}}
{"id": "3944ea0d86f49514", "prompt": "In `axum-core/src/extract/request_parts.rs` and `axum/src/extract/nested_path.rs`, I see a lot of manual `FromRequest` implementations that just delegate to the underlying `RequestParts` type. Can we refactor this to use a generic wrapper or macro to reduce boilerplate? Specifically, look at how `OriginalUri` and `Path` are constructed. I want to ensure we aren't reinventing the wheel where `axum-core` already provides `RequestParts` extraction helpers.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you update the re-exports in `axum/src/extract/mod.rs`?"}, {"prompt": "Can you verify this doesn't break the `debug_handler` test cases in `axum-macros`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3944ea0d86f49514", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:709507a83bbb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d684ee02-0f6f-4e74-a676-8d0ad3439f24"}}
{"id": "12abbf3f8f376b54", "prompt": "I need to bump the patch version for the `0.8.x` branch before we cut a release. Update Cargo.toml for axum, axum-core, axum-extra, and axum-macros. Don't touch the main branch version.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also update the CHANGELOG.md for axum to reflect the new version and list the recent fixes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "12abbf3f8f376b54", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "axum:313383ea6c31", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca00d29f-12a2-423f-aff0-f78d8c78616b"}}
{"id": "ca5f6d4f0eec2ac8", "prompt": "I need to audit the usage of `ResponseExt` across the crate. Check `axum-core/src/response/into_response_parts.rs` and `axum-extra/src/response/multiple.rs`. It looks like we're duplicating logic for extracting the body from a response. Please standardize this into a single helper function in `axum-core` and update all call sites in `axum-extra` to use it. Make sure the test in `axum-extra/test_files/index.html` context still passes (i.e., static file serving body extraction).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ca5f6d4f0eec2ac8", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "axum:744abaade906", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1621b744-e7b1-41d4-8546-1e590ed26280"}}
{"id": "5e6e07316a453bc3", "prompt": "Modifica `examples/hello-world/src/main.rs` per cambiare il messaggio di risposta da 'Hello, World!' a 'Welcome to Axum!'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ottimo, ora fai il commit di questa modifica sul branch attuale."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e6e07316a453bc3", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:b4e693ab2bc1", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8fc71a7-bac1-4377-add3-d3526b8b723f"}}
{"id": "287a9b9082ddba06", "prompt": "In the `axum` documentation, it mentions that axum doesn't have its own middleware system but uses `tower::Service`. I have a `tower::Layer` that I want to apply to my axum router. Do I just call `.layer()` on the Router, or do I need to wrap the service? Is there any overhead in this delegation?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How do I apply a layer only to specific routes and not the whole router?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any layers in `tower-http` that don't play nice with axum's extractors?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "287a9b9082ddba06", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:6b4137d6f7d9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3921c306-3887-43fc-8afd-879612a98c95"}}
{"id": "f95a99ea0495dc01", "prompt": "Hey, found a weird behavior in `axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs`. If a cookie isn't present, does it panic or return a proper rejection? I see `Option` extraction logic in `axum-core` but want to double-check the cookie extractor handles missing cookies gracefully without hitting `unwrap()`. Please review the cookie extraction code for potential panics on malformed headers.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f95a99ea0495dc01", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "axum:0c3ac45b6654", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19532933-66f4-45db-95c9-26bdb33ad1c8"}}
{"id": "e4e7e0df56a35480", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `axum-extra` crate, specifically the `TypedHeader` extractor. The docs say it's available in `axum-extra` but I'm seeing some deprecation warnings or confusion about whether it's still the recommended way to handle typed headers in the main `axum` crate for 0.9.\n\nCan you check the official Axum 0.9 documentation or migration guides to see if `TypedHeader` has moved or if there are any breaking changes in how it should be used compared to 0.7? I want to make sure I'm using the correct import path and that I haven't missed any new constraints.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e4e7e0df56a35480", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:536e84ee1216", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8554f6a6-dbfa-4b4a-bf40-6c3bb5493c6a"}}
{"id": "1d5ecffefae86194", "prompt": "Hey, quick question on `tower-http`'s `TraceLayer` config.\n\nI'm trying to disable the default log level for successful 2xx responses because it's too verbose in our production logs. I know `TraceLayer` uses `on_request`, `on_response`, and `on_eos` callbacks, but I can't find the exact signature for customizing the log level per status code in the tower-http docs.\n\nCould you look up how to configure the `TraceLayer` to only log warnings for 4xx and errors for 5xx, while suppressing 200s? I saw something about `DefaultMakeSpan` but that doesn't seem to control the log level directly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1d5ecffefae86194", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:73ff2fae56cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c181334f-eb0d-4668-a643-20beadf592bc"}}
{"id": "c5d604bcf0813f5b", "prompt": "What changed in axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs between the last two commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c5d604bcf0813f5b", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:bb28ea6d9291", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfe6aa8e-b29c-4198-bafe-05f5ce9b7504"}}
{"id": "7288251de76afea0", "prompt": "On doit préparer la migration vers la version 0.9. Peux-tu commencer par une analyse de l'impact sur les extracteurs et les handlers ? J'ai besoin que tu regardes en particulier `axum/src/extract/` et `axum/src/handler/mod.rs` pour voir si les changements de signatures actuels cassent les implémentations existantes. Fais un état des lieux des tests qui échouent dans `axum-macros/tests/` à cause de ça.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7288251de76afea0", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:e33bd42a3ca1", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70ecb7f4-6c95-4806-b29d-fef3cadc9643"}}
{"id": "995676e1fd1f4e8f", "prompt": "I'm using `axum::extract::multipart::Multipart` in my handler. The docs mention it's backed by `hyper::Body`. Can you look up the `hyper` crate documentation for `hyper::body::Receiver`? I want to verify if `Multipart` supports seeking or if it's strictly a forward-only stream, because I need to process the parts in a specific order.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "995676e1fd1f4e8f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:a8a24d674645", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb54bca1-ee73-4e95-9df9-585008b0b5bb"}}
{"id": "d657c2fddbce5879", "prompt": "I'm seeing some inconsistencies in how we handle SSE. Can you investigate the following:\n\n- Check `axum/src/error_handling/mod.rs` to see if we should be standardizing how SSE event errors are reported.\n- Verify that `axum: treat CRLF as a single SSE line ending` is correctly implemented in the core logic and isn't being overridden by any middleware in `axum/src/middleware/`.\n- Look at `examples/sse/assets/script.js` and see if the client-side implementation needs updates to match the new `Event::raw` capabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d657c2fddbce5879", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:3f5b14a583c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ee9f1b2-7c9d-46b1-a666-ae1b805e8964"}}
{"id": "48f6007359a12d0d", "prompt": "I saw the commit 'fix(axum-extra): handle missing optional typed headers (#3886)'. Can you find the specific file in `axum-extra` that implements the fix? I need to see the logic change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "48f6007359a12d0d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:093beae9d281", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48cd83df-a90a-4585-bb97-c29da3d50b73"}}
{"id": "b8bd813505a82e3c", "prompt": "帮我构建一下 axum-core 这个 crate，我怀疑最近提交到 ext_traits/request.rs 的改动导致了编译失败。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b8bd813505a82e3c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:f72d7373de29", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f21cbf2-8cd0-4d85-abe2-3bf637cdf715"}}
{"id": "6cd9cbd33c010902", "prompt": "Update the error message in `axum-extra/src/extract/json_deserializer.rs` from 'failed to deserialize' to 'JSON deserialization failed' to be more explicit.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if this change affects any existing tests in `axum-extra`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6cd9cbd33c010902", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "axum:957e3e6d25a6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3213c0bc-c349-40d4-8a3e-5077d5fc9d4b"}}
{"id": "2044f85e7212b416", "prompt": "I'm trying to serve static files. I see there are two examples: `static-file-server` and `low-level-native-tls`. Do I need to implement `tower::Service` manually for static files, or is there a built-in extractor? What's the recommended approach for large files?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2044f85e7212b416", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:a7b9dc0f3f70", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9453919-3bc5-4103-a8ac-6a61dcaf80cf"}}
{"id": "dbfe4ae787b991d8", "prompt": "In `axum-macros/tests/debug_handler/fail/multiple_paths.stderr`, it seems like the macro doesn't allow defining the same handler for multiple paths in a single attribute. Is this a hard limitation or intended design? Why can't I just use `.route(\"/a\", get(handler)).route(\"/b\", get(handler))` instead?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dbfe4ae787b991d8", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "axum:96c64e6329da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a417e1e-a8d6-4640-803a-32bba7675bc8"}}
{"id": "5761480c7893390a", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `0.8.x` branch mentioned in the README for stable releases. Can you check the latest version of `tower-http` compatible with our current `axum` version in `axum/Cargo.toml`? The documentation for `CompressionLayer` seems to have changed significantly in recent minor versions and I want to make sure we aren't using deprecated config options.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5761480c7893390a", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:d2aa1d1d115a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2b2aac5-0d56-4bde-b538-46bb6dd1bf48"}}
{"id": "ed3994dfa8e571ae", "prompt": "¿Cómo funciona el extractor `Json` que se encuentra en `axum/src/json.rs`? Me interesa saber cómo maneja la deserialización del cuerpo de la petición.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ed3994dfa8e571ae", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:93854dc5f94b", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80f57948-2653-423f-a867-ef9a05deffc2"}}
{"id": "997f0426a0251e8f", "prompt": "I'm looking at `axum-extra/src/response/content_disposition.rs`. How is the `ContentDisposition` type actually constructed?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a way to set the filename as an option?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "997f0426a0251e8f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:992da818f9c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f64010d9-0a38-4cf2-a8e1-082560cd9b89"}}
{"id": "9ce5e0db41e4966c", "prompt": "I need to do some manual exploration of the directory structure and maybe run some quick grep commands. Open me an interactive terminal.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9ce5e0db41e4966c", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "axum:48da2446e4b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "76507fcb-b26f-4462-b688-88f4774802d2"}}
{"id": "016235f943ca0e57", "prompt": "I need to migrate the `examples/diesel-postgres` project. Look at its `Cargo.toml` and identify all the diesel and sql-related dependencies. Then, I want you to update the versions in that file to the latest stable releases available on crates.io, assuming I have internet access or can infer the latest versions from the context of other crates in this repo. Specifically, ensure `diesel` and `diesel-async` are aligned.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "016235f943ca0e57", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:a5fe73e204bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea9d98d3-6b7f-40bd-8704-99c8b617f0ec"}}
{"id": "6e0b4cc36cf8f4b4", "prompt": "Pode verificar se o projeto compila e rodar os testes unitários? Estou vendo alguns avisos no `axum-core` e quero ter certeza de que nada quebrou após o último merge.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Se passar, roda o benchmark para ver se há regressão de performance no roteador?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6e0b4cc36cf8f4b4", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:f07e2e1713d3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6302118a-f344-4d31-92d6-55136637c4e9"}}
{"id": "e21d782c2d10bc71", "prompt": "My SSE events are not being sent correctly in `examples/sse/src/main.rs`. Specifically, if I use `Event::raw` to send a payload with newlines, the client sees it as multiple events because the `f34890` commit that fixed CRLF handling seems to have broken raw payloads.\n\nHere is the code:\n```rust\nEvent::raw(\"data: line1\\ndata: line2\\n\\n\")\n```\n\nThe client receives two events instead of one. Any ideas?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e21d782c2d10bc71", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:491e46bdb819", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3270e004-c456-4f62-ab42-be73bb26acf0"}}
{"id": "c9074c9690992bf6", "prompt": "I noticed we are still using an old version of `serde` in the examples. Can you check `examples/Cargo.lock` and see if we can upgrade it to the latest version? Also, let me know if there are any known breaking changes in the new version that would affect `examples/hello-world/src/main.rs`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if updating `serde` requires changes to the `CreateUser` struct in the main README example as well."}, {"prompt": "If the upgrade is safe, create a new branch for it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c9074c9690992bf6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "axum:b08af23059b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d9c7d79d-d5d1-4a76-9726-9633d7824126"}}
{"id": "8e04b71929487e54", "prompt": "Where is the `TypedPath` derive macro defined? I want to read the implementation of the generated code for debugging a compilation error.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8e04b71929487e54", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:8e8b408d95b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c33eeb07-ccb4-4f7d-85c9-e36c42fd7a18"}}
{"id": "9d9a8bedcf33aae2", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug why our SSE endpoint isn't streaming correctly on Safari. Can you take a screenshot of https://html5test.com/results/desktop.html and let me know what the highest score is for Safari right now? I'm worried about HTTP/2 support.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, Safari supports HTTP/2. So it must be our implementation. I'll check `axum/src/docs/handlers_intro.md` for any known quirks."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d9a8bedcf33aae2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "axum:594aa44b230f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "849ba14b-34d7-4481-b0a7-4fa053e491f3"}}
{"id": "2085e252c7e17c90", "prompt": "I'm seeing a memory leak with `Router::new().route(\"/stream\", get(stream_handler))`. The handler uses a `Stream` that never completes, and memory usage grows linearly. \n\n```rust\nasync fn stream_handler() -> impl Stream<Item = Result<Bytes, axum::Error>> {\n    futures::stream::repeat_with(|| Ok::<_, axum::Error>(Bytes::from(\"data\")))\n}\n```\n\nI suspect `hyper` or `axum` isn't cancelling the stream when the client disconnects. Can you check `axum/src/handler/service.rs` to see if we're correctly handling the `Future` cancellation? \n\nHere is the relevant code:\n\n```rust\nimpl<T, S> Service<T> for HandlerService<S>\nwhere\n    S: Future<Output = Response>,\n    T: Into<Request<HttpBody>> + Send + 'static,\n    S::Future: Send,\n{\n    type Response = Response;\n    type Error = Infallible;\n    type Future = Fut;\n\n    fn call(&mut self, req: T) -> Self::Future {\n        // ...\n    }\n}\n```\n\nWe need to make sure the stream is polled to completion or cancelled properly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this apply to `axum-extra`'s `AsyncReadBody` as well?"}, {"prompt": "Please add a test case in `axum/src/routing/tests/merge.rs` to simulate a client disconnect."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2085e252c7e17c90", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "axum:c37ca0bf0732", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a212ea4-5334-4133-acbd-5d92188e45bb"}}
{"id": "df77b8f8d83039a6", "prompt": "运行 `cargo test --package axum-macros --test debug_handler`。我最近修改了 handler 宏的一些错误提示逻辑，需要确认 fail 目录下的那些预期报错测试是否都还在按预期工作。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "df77b8f8d83039a6", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:641c2e4bd927", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18a31e92-84bd-4c76-9187-3715551a76e9"}}
{"id": "104bdd907e8f2286", "prompt": "There's a test file `examples/static-file-server/src/tests.rs`. I want to add a test case for a specific edge case. First, read the current tests in that file. Then, look at `examples/static-file-server/assets/index.html` to see what static files are actually being served. Based on that, write a new test function that attempts to serve a non-existent file like `/assets/missing.txt` and asserts the status code is 404.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "104bdd907e8f2286", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:23b8b5841cf1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99f090d7-fea4-4f8d-aa65-786d50a12b97"}}
{"id": "015c1bf438e9504d", "prompt": "In our examples/consume-body-in-extractor-or-middleware, we're seeing weird behavior with `axum_extra::protobuf`. According to the axum-extra docs, why does `Protobuf` buffer the body? I thought it just streamed it. The error message mentions \"protobuf body buffering rejections\" which sounds related to commit 71530af but I can't find specific docs on the buffering mechanism.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "015c1bf438e9504d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:b19ec8cfd3f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "284f2686-b32a-493d-bdab-e9b307faf43c"}}
{"id": "fa4055d4d96136f8", "prompt": "I need to draft release notes for the upcoming 0.9 release based on the recent commits. Please summarize the new features like ConnectionLimits and the SSE Event::raw improvement, and list the various dependency bumps and fixes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fa4055d4d96136f8", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "axum:025d1d2f400a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "79ea4564-e356-4b24-aa13-f4ce9e9f1cfb"}}
{"id": "9af9f2a5ffa74d55", "prompt": "We need to prep for the 0.9 release by cleaning up some technical debt across the workspace. Please handle the following three tasks:\n\n1. In `axum-extra`, update the `protobuf` implementation to ensure that body buffering rejections are preserved correctly as per the recent fix. \n2. Review `axum-core/src/extract/request_parts.rs` and `axum-core/src/extract/from_ref.rs` to see if we can unify any of the redundant logic used for extracting request parts.\n3. Update the documentation in `axum/src/docs/` to reflect the new Body API changes mentioned in the recent commits.\n\nLet me know once you've scoped the changes for each.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9af9f2a5ffa74d55", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "axum:f7eae5356bd9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ab26fccc-612f-4b37-97b4-3fabbb6c84f0"}}
{"id": "7a700791c3879fdb", "prompt": "compare the current state of axum/src/extract/multipart.rs with the state at commit 7d1594a", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a700791c3879fdb", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:ca28742a96e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3f2222c-2bf4-44c3-bccf-fb2aa057b0f7"}}
{"id": "d9bef0bff08c199d", "prompt": "check git blame axum/src/handler/service.rs for the implementation of the main handler function", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d9bef0bff08c199d", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "axum:6d748403fb00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c9e2b0f-ed6f-4769-9889-4aacbef34748"}}
{"id": "054c159709748da3", "prompt": "Switch to the `main` branch and then create a new branch called `fix/sse-line-endings`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "054c159709748da3", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:d6d4201c71cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9ec7501-424c-471b-90a7-8fdc00cf7647"}}
{"id": "c5e8ffb042ad7a7f", "prompt": "Ho sbagliato l'ultimo commit, ho dimenticato di includere una modifica in `axum/src/macros.rs`. Puoi fare l'amend dell'ultimo commit includendo anche quella modifica?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c5e8ffb042ad7a7f", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:e1edfeb4c493", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65c878fe-44ea-414c-8f39-40e550547299"}}
{"id": "6159376cf8d33793", "prompt": "Can you explain how `axum/src/handler/service.rs` implements the `Service` trait? I'm trying to trace how a request actually gets from the router to a handler function.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6159376cf8d33793", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "axum:839967714911", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e541ea4-30cb-457a-8950-d34256e9a17e"}}
{"id": "200ca50d8bee28b2", "prompt": "I need to update the `deny.toml` configuration for our workspace. Could you analyze the dependencies listed in `axum/Cargo.toml` and `axum-core/Cargo.toml`?\n\nSpecifically: \n1. Are any of our dependencies marked as `license = \"unknown\"` or `license = \"copyleft\"` in the current `deny.toml`?\n2. List all the `git` dependencies currently in use across the root Cargo.toml files.\n3. Count how many dev-dependencies are in `axum/Cargo.toml` versus `axum-extra`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "200ca50d8bee28b2", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "axum:89e76d170b87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd25014d-4b35-4fee-abc7-ae1a0ed37201"}}
{"id": "28058e9f1f73a334", "prompt": "axum-extra/src/extract/cookie/mod.rs 관련 코드가 오래된 스타일로 작성된 것 같아. clippy lint를 실행해서 경고를 확인해 줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "28058e9f1f73a334", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "axum:75c2a037db27", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b44742f2-cad6-4f9e-9256-93113a640c10"}}
{"id": "3dfc13974bcb0f83", "prompt": "Where does the `Json` extractor get its deserialization logic? I need to trace where `serde_json` is called inside the axum source tree.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is it in `axum/src/json.rs` or `axum-core`/?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the `FromRequest` implementation for `Json<T>`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3dfc13974bcb0f83", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "axum:74285ec72676", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8870f888-6836-4194-b997-0cc7762a0041"}}
{"id": "35be11826dbf6d64", "prompt": "Can you add a quick doc comment to the `root` function in `examples/hello-world/src/main.rs` explaining that it's a simple handler?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Now commit this change to a new branch named `docs/hello-world-example` with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "35be11826dbf6d64", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "axum:10369979e14c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "842aa714-81a7-41ff-afd0-b141c4e572e6"}}
{"id": "a3d013eb98e6b434", "prompt": "Regarding `axum::serve` in `axum/src/routing/into_make_service.rs`, the docs for `hyper` have changed how graceful shutdowns are handled. In `examples/tls-graceful-shutdown`, we're using the old signal handling method. Can you check the hyper documentation for the new `Server::with_graceful_shutdown` or the latest recommended pattern for Axum 0.9? I want to ensure our shutdown logic in `low-level-native-tls` and `tls-graceful-shutdown` examples is up to date.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update `examples/tls-graceful-shutdown/src/main.rs` to use the new hyper shutdown API."}, {"prompt": "Apply the same pattern to `examples/low-level-rustls/src/main.rs` for consistency."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a3d013eb98e6b434", "repo": "axum", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "axum:69debbc89a12", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "axum-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9395c57a-8f55-4f98-a565-0d1384e907fa"}}
{"id": "e1a9970bcc5bb91b", "prompt": "I need to check the current state of the repo. Can you show me what files have been modified today? Also, please verify that the project builds correctly with `go build ./...` and double-check that the version number in `go.mod` is consistent with the latest tag if one exists.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e1a9970bcc5bb91b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:c7b61a87f214", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2221da57-7b5f-458d-a8f6-0757af20f268"}}
{"id": "149749cd46da4ce0", "prompt": "Can you update `active_help.go` to add a new constant for the default help template name? Just a quick addition so I can use it in the tests later.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Create a new branch called `feature/active-help-const` and commit this change with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "149749cd46da4ce0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:c9f8c7bee32b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5774faff-1ac5-4d8b-abdf-c7faca50e183"}}
{"id": "2b8e4525602d6a69", "prompt": "我遇到了一个测试错误，关于 macOS 链接失败的。我在最近的 commit adbc881 里看到它修复了这个问题。能帮我查一下 golang.org/x/tool 或 pflag 的最新文档，看看为什么在 macOS 上会出现这种链接问题以及推荐的解决方案是什么吗？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "把这个修复逻辑应用到 command_win.go 中"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2b8e4525602d6a69", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:d1b5ede3af14", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbe3d61c-c686-4749-8989-fd8a6602a437"}}
{"id": "a7c8280d7da7cab7", "prompt": "Elimina el archivo `command_notwin.go` ya que parece que es código de prueba antiguo que ya no necesitamos.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a7c8280d7da7cab7", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:6c23d340cbc0", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2604f1d8-8b11-4bcf-b83c-3134f91a627c"}}
{"id": "a15217190415faf8", "prompt": "Who was the last person to touch the fish shell completion logic? I want to see the commit message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a15217190415faf8", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:b791fbb6bab8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "778d5157-6e01-4fc9-8847-98eb08b5e3f1"}}
{"id": "de385d44e338d4f4", "prompt": "I'm looking at `command.go`. How does the `ValidArgs` field interact with the command execution lifecycle?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does `ValidArgs` affect the help text generation too?"}, {"prompt": "Show me an example of how to implement a custom validator for `ValidArgs`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "de385d44e338d4f4", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:a9097eb5a974", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42830c87-6188-4699-bb51-c15b6e370f77"}}
{"id": "c3b7948504f733b7", "prompt": "En `active_help.go`, cambia el mensaje de error cuando no se encuentra un comando para que sea un poco más descriptivo y amigable para el usuario.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c3b7948504f733b7", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:571501b1d440", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fcb04fa8-30a4-4904-ad59-ed806753e8d0"}}
{"id": "d19e23ddb2442cc2", "prompt": "Wer hat die Zeile in `command.go`, die die `Args` validiert, zuletzt bearbeitet?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d19e23ddb2442cc2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:b07ffe384ecb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dca59b1f-a19e-4404-8562-6f828243b3a2"}}
{"id": "8fc7e2b57f9297cd", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of refactoring `active_help.go` but I need to switch to a hotfix on another branch immediately. Stash my work so I have a clean working directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8fc7e2b57f9297cd", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:941b6e433f2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3536b94f-dc6c-41c5-afe1-fed2238f5c60"}}
{"id": "1234a436de1bd785", "prompt": "Create a new branch called `feat/args-validator` and move my current work there. I want to keep `main` clean until I'm ready for a PR.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1234a436de1bd785", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:aa5799277a8f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "197cd8b6-1d79-40ae-bcf7-b767ed4f9ba1"}}
{"id": "1d54ae39cef6a89b", "prompt": "I'm seeing a test failure on macOS in command_test.go related to link failure. Can you look at recent commits and tell me which file fixes this and what the change was?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1d54ae39cef6a89b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:16c029a94a55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aba8e9c8-9608-4f5a-b089-1ac87274f3e5"}}
{"id": "2cdfc8ad2f2df125", "prompt": "I need to understand how flag groups work. Find the definition of the FlagGroup struct and the functions that manage them in flag_groups.go.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2cdfc8ad2f2df125", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:19be5d7a4c8e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afb8c15a-7b9e-40a4-b0ed-4ea89fb66b4d"}}
{"id": "cdfe76993534c84a", "prompt": "Please run `gofmt -w` on the Go files in this repo and also trigger the linter defined in `.golangci.yml`. If there are any linting errors, fix them automatically if possible, or list them for me to review.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cdfe76993534c84a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:51dfa12d6175", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b36a2ee-8de8-4e26-a35e-fba70bf2861b"}}
{"id": "8bcb540073482df5", "prompt": "I need to bump the go version in `go.mod`. Currently it's 1.18. Can you check `golangci-lint`'s supported versions and update the `go.mod` directive to the minimum version supported by the current linter config? Commit the change.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Don't run tests yet, just show me the diff."}, {"prompt": "After tests pass, push the commit."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8bcb540073482df5", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:f7c2fcf679b7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d23527c5-524d-4106-abce-021efa5ada00"}}
{"id": "75a7f297dab94548", "prompt": "I'm looking at the doc generation files (man, md, rest, yaml). When I generate documentation for a command with subcommands, does it automatically flatten the hierarchy or keep the nested structure?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "75a7f297dab94548", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:4a2e8e86f06d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "681abcd4-ec91-470e-809e-f764b4a63a6e"}}
{"id": "dc53629c7d64e516", "prompt": "Vergleiche den aktuellen Stand mit dem Commit `fc81d20`. Was wurde im Bereich der Konstanten geändert?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dc53629c7d64e516", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:9d7e58b86330", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2abc869d-6ba7-4667-a6f3-2d449872a2b5"}}
{"id": "c126fc59e0e8f31a", "prompt": "I'm getting some weird behavior with flag grouping. Check `flag_groups.go` and tell me how the grouping logic is applied when generating the help output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c126fc59e0e8f31a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:ebaa9d53fdad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "606aabab-dd15-43a3-8c14-10db3a2c7d72"}}
{"id": "2f65ca2fa9eef2b0", "prompt": "You mention seamless integration with viper. Is Cobra responsible for setting up the viper bindings, or does it just provide hooks for viper to read the parsed flags?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2f65ca2fa9eef2b0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:6878612cb56b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea552a1d-e9d1-492c-9125-6d5404548b6c"}}
{"id": "936f14c414ae287a", "prompt": "Ändere bitte in `args.go` die Validierung so, dass sie strenger prüft, ob die Argumente leer sind.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Perfekt. Erstelle jetzt einen neuen Branch `feature/strict-args` und committe die Arbeit."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "936f14c414ae287a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:b168dfe60b4a", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ad35c73-1759-482e-907f-52cacf830c3d"}}
{"id": "a3fdef6de94b0568", "prompt": "Kannst du mir erklären, wie ich in Cobra verschiedene Flag-Gruppen definiere, um die Hilfe-Ausgabe besser zu organisieren? Ich habe gehört, dass das mit `MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive` oder ähnlichem geht, aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, wie die API genau aussieht.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a3fdef6de94b0568", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:6a00e6a452df", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6b9f518-508a-49af-9d0e-5d34903a5dc2"}}
{"id": "250e918933266f28", "prompt": "I noticed that `zsh_completions.go` is generating a `compdef` for a command that has `Hidden: true` set. This is leaking internal commands to the shell autocomplete, which is annoying and exposes implementation details.\n\nExample command:\n```go\ndebugCmd := &cobra.Command{\n    Use:    \"internal-debug\",\n    Hidden: true,\n    Run:    func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {},\n}\n```\n\nWhen I generate zsh completions:\n```go\nvar buf bytes.Buffer\nrootCmd.GenZshCompletion(&buf)\nfmt.Println(buf.String())\n```\n\nThe output still includes:\n```zsh\ncompdef _rootCmd rootCmd\n# ... _rootCmd_internal_debug function ...\n```\n\nThis shouldn't happen. Please update the Zsh completion generation logic in `zsh_completions.go` to skip commands where `cmd.Hidden` is true.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "250e918933266f28", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:3ebd0f49c620", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8f51c756-b2a2-496e-a0f3-6f04826a349f"}}
{"id": "22af2971c5821bd4", "prompt": "Der Commit `746ef07` hat ein Problem verursacht, das wir vorhin besprochen haben. Kannst du diesen spezifischen Commit rückgängig machen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "22af2971c5821bd4", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:dfa75aa42585", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39f1dd2c-6e34-431b-b1c5-a65ae680d556"}}
{"id": "1f6154e73ef3c484", "prompt": "In `shell_completions.go`, `bash_completions.go`, `zsh_completions.go`, and `fish_completions.go`, the logic for generating the `__start_<project>` completion function is repetitive. Specifically, the block that checks `COMP_WORDS` against known commands and delegates to the language-specific handler is almost identical across files.\n\nRefactor this shared logic into a helper function in `shell_completions.go` and have the specific files call it. Preserve all existing behavior and variable naming where the specific logic diverges.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The refactored function in `shell_completions.go` needs to accept the specific language-dependent strings as arguments to maintain modularity."}, {"prompt": "Can you ensure that the `bash_completionsV2` tests pass since the structure changed slightly?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1f6154e73ef3c484", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:b5456d221dde", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bcf86733-9cfd-43d2-bce8-fca6e99c5ef6"}}
{"id": "cb82b5535b93d54a", "prompt": "I need to understand the doc generation logic. How do the files in `doc/` actually transform the command structure into markdown or man pages?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Explain the role of `doc/util.go` in this process."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cb82b5535b93d54a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:ed2be0a4fdd3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "44a89460-d47c-40ac-969e-38684f46b111"}}
{"id": "3a422ab3a00eda6b", "prompt": "I need to verify the current status of the Kubernetes project's CLI dependencies. Specifically, can you check the live response from the pflag go.sum registry to confirm the version of `pflag` being used in the latest stable release? Also, please check if there are any open CVEs reported against `github.com/spf13/pflag` versions <= 1.0.9 by querying the GitHub Security Advisories API for `spf13/cobra`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3a422ab3a00eda6b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:c47efcc5b97f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18f92001-f221-4983-b9f2-0e978e45ae9c"}}
{"id": "1d34cae966229140", "prompt": "I'm looking at `bash_completions.go` and `zsh_completions.go`. They both have nearly identical logic for generating the list of active shell completions. Can you refactor this into a shared helper function in `shell_completions.go`? Please make sure the tests still pass after you touch this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1d34cae966229140", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:241fd3b1a98a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7ad4083-0cde-4bc6-b600-8be2550ce357"}}
{"id": "0b8f043d6278aed2", "prompt": "Please take a screenshot of the https://cobra.dev site's completions page for bash completion to check if the code snippet in the README matches the current documentation. Also, check the live status of the GitHub Actions workflow for `spf13/cobra` to see if the main branch is currently passing all linter checks. If there are failures, list the specific linter error messages shown in the recent run.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b8f043d6278aed2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:2986d8456717", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f25546bc-ce5a-4499-878a-f873e818bbb2"}}
{"id": "baecef6b500af28d", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit. I accidentally included some debug print statements in `args.go` that shouldn't be there. Can you amend the last commit to remove those lines?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "baecef6b500af28d", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:bdd7e41eb3df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "517045f3-41e4-40db-8676-18fe77673c7e"}}
{"id": "17947a7a7f470ab8", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue where bash completions might be slow. Can you look at bash_completions.go and check if we can optimize the loop to avoid unnecessary allocations?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests to make sure nothing broke."}, {"prompt": "Compare the performance with the current implementation."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "17947a7a7f470ab8", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:026fc2434853", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3550d6a-f787-4d5b-ace1-d78caf5cfe40"}}
{"id": "2d8df368ef21c890", "prompt": "Can you explain the purpose of the `Args` type in `args.go` and how it's used for validation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2d8df368ef21c890", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:01dc96630efd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b22a32a-3d74-4a02-8924-7d6ba41b01bf"}}
{"id": "b8921ea163e02e64", "prompt": "The documentation for man pages in doc/man_docs.go seems outdated. Can you review the existing doc/man_docs.go and ensure the generated output matches the structure described in site/content/docgen/man.md?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b8921ea163e02e64", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "cobra:01b9ac5ace88", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d98a3547-3b8d-4848-9d06-0fb045418515"}}
{"id": "ea54654fd5d6babd", "prompt": "I'm seeing a performance regression in the fish shell completion generation. Could you check `fish_completions.go`? Specifically, look at how we're iterating over commands to generate the completions. There might be an unnecessary loop or redundant string concatenation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ea54654fd5d6babd", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:800880b4c789", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "41e4a7d6-f008-4c7b-902f-2628fa6c5f6f"}}
{"id": "cebc7f20805efbbb", "prompt": "Wer hat die letzten Änderungen an der `bash_completions.go` vorgenommen und warum?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Zeig mir die Commit-Nachricht von der letzten Änderung an dieser Datei."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cebc7f20805efbbb", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:8588b00cc0a1", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4f3c448-ac76-4a63-8d58-e58071bfd83c"}}
{"id": "b17c80ff74df6ffa", "prompt": "Agrega un nuevo test de unidad en `args_test.go` para verificar que el validador de argumentos funcione correctamente con un caso de borde.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b17c80ff74df6ffa", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:087bb3d8b0fb", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8880384-d35f-4155-aba3-0eb4ffa0cba9"}}
{"id": "19a1249c4875dcca", "prompt": "请查阅 viper 的官方文档，确认它与 cobra 集成时，如何正确定义重复标志（repeated flags）的行为。我在 docgen 相关的文档里看到了一些关于 yaml 输出的描述，但不确定 viper 解析时的默认行为。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "19a1249c4875dcca", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:90431f74a3aa", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "feec9284-5b3b-4194-8edb-85be778b9d47"}}
{"id": "27bdb61b8ac1d0d1", "prompt": "I'm looking at `command.go`. How are subcommands actually attached to a parent command?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the way subcommands are added affect how help is generated in `active_help.go`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27bdb61b8ac1d0d1", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:2704ad38c6f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f841d17e-a434-4c4c-9aac-518b90f4b877"}}
{"id": "875dd075ace69fa2", "prompt": "Everything is broken. Revert the last commit (the one that updated the linter rules) and let me see if the tests pass again.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "875dd075ace69fa2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:98dd05f33467", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "285c68a4-53ad-4a5e-8bc2-dcfc4a57191a"}}
{"id": "ac36376a8fb86b16", "prompt": "Can you start the example server in the `site/` directory so I can preview the documentation changes locally? I'm working on the `site/content/completions/zsh.md` page and need to see how the rendered markdown looks.\n\nI think there's a Makefile target for this? If not, just run `hugo server` or whatever is standard for this docs site setup.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac36376a8fb86b16", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:ba2c3c1e75a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "214c20fb-357c-4928-8541-dbe478887402"}}
{"id": "36ca42f3992d077a", "prompt": "where is the suggestion logic implemented? The error message \"did you mean '...'\" appears when a typo is detected in a subcommand. I need the code source.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36ca42f3992d077a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:dd9f7bc99543", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "942450f0-1822-440f-8293-67221115d08a"}}
{"id": "2ce18ac482992a21", "prompt": "我在写 fish_completions.go 时遇到了一个问题，fish shell 对特殊字符的处理和 bash 不太一样。能帮我查一下 fish 官方文档关于自动补全脚本中如何处理转义字符的部分吗？最近有个 commit 746ef07 修复了类似问题。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2ce18ac482992a21", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:4f78a2816a15", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8f548b4f-f4a9-4a62-ab94-a28d2d0a3e92"}}
{"id": "8b57edd6c97f05e7", "prompt": "I need to trace the origin of the `SuggestForMatches` function. Which file defines it and where is it called from?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8b57edd6c97f05e7", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:27d2fe1b6bf7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f94611fd-cc1a-49de-b9c1-440852f68ac5"}}
{"id": "2d31af1209f1f753", "prompt": "We need to add a new dependency for something that handles specialized shell output formatting. Look at how shell_completions.go handles completions currently and suggest where a new utility library would fit best.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2d31af1209f1f753", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "cobra:33e5468ff6ec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "45647f31-50cb-438a-be34-63a10c24ef0c"}}
{"id": "01ce176a95a7aa8f", "prompt": "Can you walk me through the `args.go` logic? I want to know how the different argument validation types (like `ExactArgs`, `MinimumNArgs`, etc.) are actually implemented and checked during runtime.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "01ce176a95a7aa8f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:c1ecb359ce77", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d22c5b1-2a42-4477-8ff5-f825d5168925"}}
{"id": "7f971ece44237039", "prompt": "There's a `MAINTAINERS` file. Parse it and tell me how many core maintainers are listed. Then, check `CONTRIBUTING.md` and see if the process for becoming a maintainer is explicitly defined or if it's just implied.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7f971ece44237039", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:46b48fa76b8f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afcb5fb5-479a-4115-861f-4704d9a28e33"}}
{"id": "fbcc028aff233693", "prompt": "Ich habe ein paar Änderungen an den Bash-Completions gemacht, aber die sind noch ziemlich chaotisch. Kannst du das in logische Commits aufteilen?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Vergiss nicht, die Commit-Messages nach dem Projekt-Standard zu schreiben."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fbcc028aff233693", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:18a87364acea", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9cc6d5c0-5ef3-43d0-9345-4598aadeb3d2"}}
{"id": "1a29a895740b25f0", "prompt": "I need to find the flag group implementation. Where are the types defined and which tests cover the grouping behavior?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1a29a895740b25f0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:03d13ac23be2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "60fba3c8-e48a-45c3-ab39-9986cd3ffbdd"}}
{"id": "19806aed45519246", "prompt": "I need to add support for a new shell completion format, but first, can you help me understand how the existing zsh completer works? Explain the flow in `zsh_completions.go` and `shell_completions.go`. I'm particularly interested in how the `ShellCompDirective` is interpreted.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "19806aed45519246", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:fe432aadbbaf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dcc481c2-6e18-4283-808f-d4e444d490bc"}}
{"id": "27da7303fc7e5396", "prompt": "I need to wait for the docgen to finish building all the MD files before I run the site deployment. Write a small helper that polls the doc/ directory and returns once the expected number of .md files are present.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a timeout to that helper so it doesn't loop forever if the build fails."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27da7303fc7e5396", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:aafc4cb677bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "712f83ed-55a2-43bf-a1ea-d835e6354d4f"}}
{"id": "f99f1fdcff2a76d3", "prompt": "The error message 'fatal: could not read Username' appears when running `git push` through our CLI wrapper. I know this isn't a Cobra error, but I need to know what it means according to the Git documentation so I can help users troubleshoot. Where can I find the official explanation for this?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a standard exit code associated with this?"}, {"prompt": "Should we be catching this in the error handler?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f99f1fdcff2a76d3", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:bef76bbc76bd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "88e6cf67-9ed6-4bfe-8bb0-920f3ed7794c"}}
{"id": "5dfa9bcd044ed4f6", "prompt": "I'm seeing a failure in `TestFlagCompletion` inside `completions_test.go`. It looks like it's failing on macOS specifically. Can you check the error output and see if it's related to the `zsh_completions.go` logic? Here's the output:\n\n```text\n=== RUN   TestFlagCompletion\n    completions_test.go:142: \n        \tError Trace:\tcompletions_test.go:142\n        \tError:       \tReceived unexpected error: exit status 1\n        \tTest:        \tTestFlagCompletion\n--- FAIL: TestFlagCompletion (0.54s)\n```\n\nPlease investigate and fix it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also run the full test suite to make sure nothing else broke?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5dfa9bcd044ed4f6", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:85117f75a7a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d65fd08-97f5-4fd8-be50-ad41e241395c"}}
{"id": "36dfbd3d7daa40ca", "prompt": "Check doc/man_docs.go and tell me how the man page generation handles nested subcommands. Does it create one big file or separate files?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it use any external tools for the formatting?"}, {"prompt": "How are the examples from doc/man_examples_test.go integrated into the output?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36dfbd3d7daa40ca", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:36a336997f8c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cd79910f-e5db-401b-b0a4-2d3eb6568e67"}}
{"id": "d357557082f9dd67", "prompt": "Find all files that generate shell completions for fish. I need to know which function is the entry point for generating the script content.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d357557082f9dd67", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:9ad8c0c7ee0c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf3d66bf-bb6f-4818-aa4d-5940346161e7"}}
{"id": "a80ef0ba8b14bb36", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the next major version. Please handle the following tasks:\n1. Review `doc/man_docs.go` and `doc/md_docs.go` to ensure they are consistent with our new documentation standards.\n2. Check `bash_completionsV2.go` and see if we can unify any logic with the existing `bash_completions.go` to reduce duplication.\n3. Update the shell completion documentation in `site/content/completions/` for fish, zsh, and powershell to reflect the recent changes in how directives are handled.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a80ef0ba8b14bb36", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:89da76ca2d22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2baf91c-c923-4aeb-a370-a8242e72fa1f"}}
{"id": "0a7318aadc1ee83f", "prompt": "I'm seeing a warning in the linter about `minUsagePadding` being a var instead of a const. Can you find where this is currently defined and used?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0a7318aadc1ee83f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:a6bb7fd96b93", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd181429-56fa-463e-8a76-6c8a0c64e74f"}}
{"id": "33934a856736a315", "prompt": "I'm seeing `os.Args` being mutated in the completion flow. Can you find the code that appends to it? I saw a commit #2356 recently but I can't track down the specific line in `completions.go` or `cobra.go`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "33934a856736a315", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:5613fb023038", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d0447c2-7955-4824-8814-24326afae588"}}
{"id": "a74e2a1005b15ac0", "prompt": "Ich versuche gerade, die Shell-Autocompletions für mein Projekt zu konfigurieren. In der `completions.go` sehe ich viele Directives wie `ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp`. Was bedeutet `ShellCompDirectiveNoSpace` genau und wann sollte ich es im Vergleich zu `ShellCompDirectiveDefault` verwenden?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a74e2a1005b15ac0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:409ff7c3ed88", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e082b0c7-92b3-4b6b-9443-069a81a3e74f"}}
{"id": "5a3ceb4a5c13cfcc", "prompt": "I need to draft the release notes for the next version. Please summarize the key changes from the last 5 commits, specifically focusing on the fixes in bash completions and the pflag bump.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5a3ceb4a5c13cfcc", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "cobra:7aeec0d0a5dd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9900e610-2795-481d-9c73-ba92d50d89d7"}}
{"id": "cdc06755e44a2499", "prompt": "The `PersistentPreRun` hook is not being skipped when a command is marked as `Disabled: true`. This breaks my workflow because I have health-check commands in my CLI that are disabled by default but I still want their `PersistentPreRun` to run if the parent command explicitly invokes it (via a different path).\n\nWait, no, actually the bug is the opposite: The documentation says disabled commands should still execute `PreRun` but not `Run`. However, in version 1.9+, `PersistentPreRun` is running even when I explicitly call `Validate()` on a disabled command, and it's causing side effects because it assumes the command is active.\n\nHere is the code:\n```go\ncmd := &cobra.Command{\n    Use: \"disabled-cmd\",\n    Disable: true,\n    PersistentPreRun: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {\n        fmt.Println(\"This should NOT run if the command is disabled and not entered.\")\n    },\n    Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {\n        fmt.Println(\"Hello\")\n    },\n}\n\n// When I just run `Validate()` it shouldn't trigger hooks,\n// but when I call `cmd.Execute()` it runs PreRun but not PersistentPreRun?\n// Actually, I see PersistentPreRun running in my test env.\n```\n\nPlease check `command.go` in the `execute` and `Validate` flow. `PersistentPreRun` should only run if the command is actually being executed, not just validated, or if it's not disabled. Currently, it seems `PersistentPreRun` runs for disabled commands if the parent runs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cdc06755e44a2499", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:af6e61c2235d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "108733e6-2028-4250-861d-502413a13843"}}
{"id": "c9d7d8c2bb822e89", "prompt": "Hey, can you check why the linter is complaining about `minUsagePadding`? \n\nI saw this error:\n```\ncobra.go:123:1: var `minUsagePadding` should be of type `int`... (wait, no it's fine)\n\nActually, looking at recent commits, fc81d20 changed it. Can you just run golangci-lint to confirm the current state of the codebase? I want to make sure the recent autofixes didn't introduce anything weird.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9d7d8c2bb822e89", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:2dd13a14da57", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dcf219e7-899f-4405-a2e8-eb39449fa08e"}}
{"id": "62002720319fd17c", "prompt": "Mist, ich habe den letzten Commit mit der Änderung der `minUsagePadding` in `command.go` versehentlich mit einem Tippfehler im Kommentar gemacht. Kannst du das korrigieren und den letzten Commit einfach amenden?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "62002720319fd17c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:8be4c69fc1b2", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75d5cae4-2356-4d1c-b33f-7af7daf12a0b"}}
{"id": "723feced4d8a2327", "prompt": "We need to expand our documentation coverage. Please handle the following:\n- Update `site/content/docgen/man.md` to reflect the latest command structure changes.\n- Add a new section to `site/content/user_guide.md` about how to use `ShellCompDirective` for custom completions.\n- Check `doc/man_docs.go` to ensure our man page generation is picking up the new documentation updates correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "723feced4d8a2327", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:c83da3a1231f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54430aac-a564-4bf6-bed9-a8b5fb18ecab"}}
{"id": "d3e0da2847794bab", "prompt": "Devo verificare se c'è una CVE recente che riguarda la libreria pflag (la dipendenza di Cobra che ho visto nelle commit recenti). Riesci a cercare su GitHub o in un database di vulnerabilità se esistono report di sicurezza per le versioni 1.0.8 e 1.0.9?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d3e0da2847794bab", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:09db7c0ac5f5", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19b0d912-aa3f-4755-86f7-457c560d5c26"}}
{"id": "25ce01de61b79920", "prompt": "I want to see if upgrading golangci-lint will cause more of those 'linter error' issues we saw in commit f2878ba. Try to run the linter and tell me if the current configuration in .golangci.yml is sufficient for the latest version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "25ce01de61b79920", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "cobra:903a568b9835", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a47602e1-496d-4cef-bb8f-9a4a74288882"}}
{"id": "e74a55b73bfac429", "prompt": "Renombra la variable `minUsagePadding` en `command.go` a `MinUsagePadding` para que sea exportable y actualiza todas las referencias en el proyecto.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e74a55b73bfac429", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:412a765220a9", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a09348a3-903b-4927-96be-b1df3f43f729"}}
{"id": "f2ad2187e2d5894c", "prompt": "The error handling in `command.go` is messy. We have a lot of `if err != nil { return err }` blocks that don't add any context. Since this is an internal library, let's switch to returning wrapped errors using `fmt.Errorf` with `%w`. Scan `command.go` and `args.go` and fix these up.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Don't change the logic, just the error wrapping strategy."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2ad2187e2d5894c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:62febc11b081", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "88039c05-3c4c-4782-8ef2-72b118a66246"}}
{"id": "b438cd25ba22390e", "prompt": "The YAML documentation generator in `doc/yaml_docs.go` is escaping the backticks inside code examples incorrectly. If my command help has ```go\n```\n\nIt's producing invalid YAML. Can you fix the serialization logic in `yaml_docs_test.go` as well to ensure we have coverage?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run `make test` to make sure nothing else broke."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b438cd25ba22390e", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:43ef29a01823", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebd1c384-6e31-40f3-a970-55508fcfbca5"}}
{"id": "db41cf8c98dfcf0a", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue where the error message for missing required flags is too blunt. Can you tweak the error string in `command.go` to be more descriptive? Maybe suggest using `--help`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db41cf8c98dfcf0a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:422b352c6078", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9ffb102-08be-4cc7-b80e-88e510fda6ce"}}
{"id": "63e40d6996a22231", "prompt": "The documentation generation code in `doc/` is split across many files. It's hard to maintain. Can you restructure the `man_docs.go` and `md_docs.go` to share a common output writer interface? I want to make sure we aren't duplicating the YAML and REST doc generation logic either. Let's centralize that if possible.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Keep the exported functions in `doc/man_docs.go` and `doc/md_docs.go` as entry points."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63e40d6996a22231", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:795c750430a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee498285-aef2-4470-abf4-ede516ce0acf"}}
{"id": "6d0d0024d2eb51ef", "prompt": "How does the shell completion logic differ between bash_completions.go and bash_completionsV2.go?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is the V2 version intended to replace the original?"}, {"prompt": "Can you show me where the actual shell script template is defined?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6d0d0024d2eb51ef", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:c1c18eb5b2c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd3d05d6-74e3-40da-b2cf-40444991086b"}}
{"id": "0ea22a918ee559c2", "prompt": "Rename `minUsagePadding` to `defaultMinUsagePadding` in `command.go` and update all references.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if any tests in `command_test.go` need updating due to this change."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ea22a918ee559c2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:963fd630f09a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "819f4ff1-c38f-4899-8f70-456efcc070b6"}}
{"id": "5102cfdc08e6197e", "prompt": "In `cobra.go:Run`, there's a hardcoded sleep duration of 1 second. It seems like this should be configurable or at least extracted to a constant so we can mock it in tests without relying on real time. Can you extract this magic number into a named constant and update all callers?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5102cfdc08e6197e", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:b8e27a75dfad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4db54a02-e725-4c36-ae3d-a70baba09314"}}
{"id": "5c93b2461e0b602c", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when running the docgen tests. It looks like it's waiting on a file lock that isn't releasing. Can you check if any processes are holding onto files in the doc/ directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5c93b2461e0b602c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:9707334763ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "763c246a-a3f3-48a3-840c-a627e3d98156"}}
{"id": "4e734435234855ea", "prompt": "Where is the `ShellCompDirective` constant defined and which file handles the logic for setting it as the default for subcommands?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the tests that cover this default behavior."}, {"prompt": "Does the bash completion handler respect this directive?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4e734435234855ea", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:8937b234393a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b38b7ab-40fb-4fe3-b943-ee774de74688"}}
{"id": "fa53bf2a7875c292", "prompt": "Hat sich die Dokumentation von sub-Command-Hilfe-Texten geändert? Letztes Commit war `117698a Add documentation for repeated flags functionality`. Wie erstelle ich jetzt korrekt man-Pages oder Markdown-Docs für verschachtelte Commands? Nutze ich dafür die Funktionen in `doc/`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Welche Unterschiede gibt es zwischen `md_docs.go` und `rest_docs.go`?"}, {"prompt": "Muss ich dafür extra Imports hinzufügen?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fa53bf2a7875c292", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:878866bbb05b", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "58f0f61c-a2e1-45ab-8f55-6494ff45d708"}}
{"id": "6794f14bd49ddfc9", "prompt": "The error message in args.go when a required argument is missing is a bit cryptic. Can you update it to be more descriptive, like 'requires at least 1 arg(s), but got 0'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6794f14bd49ddfc9", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:12ff99a625fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c3a0371-c9fd-481f-bf58-cf677927effa"}}
{"id": "0ea076ed5d140375", "prompt": "Warum gibt es separate Dateien für Windows (`command_win.go`) und Nicht-Windows (`command_notwin.go`)? Ich suche nach einer spezifischen Logik zur Pfadtrennung oder Anführungszeichen-Escaping in den Completions. Kannst du mir die relevante Implementierung zeigen?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Gibt es hier bekannte Inkompatibilitäten mit PowerShell?"}, {"prompt": "Wie wirkt sich das auf `powershell_completions.go` aus?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ea076ed5d140375", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:c7d7c2886434", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a38728a-3025-4437-b0ae-817c7a45bce3"}}
{"id": "71a25a35a309867d", "prompt": "The project claims to be POSIX-compliant for flags. Does that mean it strictly adheres to the Single Unix Specification, or just standard GNU getopt behavior?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "71a25a35a309867d", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:732f883cea95", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b704f436-868f-4883-a269-0db6a864e76a"}}
{"id": "a31d77b4ded2867f", "prompt": "I need a quick benchmark on the command lookup logic. \n\nCan you create a benchmark script or add a benchmark function in command_test.go for the `Execute` method? I want to compare the performance of the new argument validation logic from `ad460ea` against the baseline.\n\nSpecifically, run it with `go test -bench=BenchmarkExecute -benchmem`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Based on the results, if it's a regression, check if `args.go` is doing unnecessary allocations."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a31d77b4ded2867f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:a9fbab2f71f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d9d11e08-a7ff-4800-80a3-4f8fa38158b6"}}
{"id": "dc9d8fe31bb03330", "prompt": "Hey, quick question. In `bash_completionsV2.go`, I'm seeing some logic related to `ShellCompDirective`. Is there any official info on the `Default ShellCompDirective` customization? The commit log mentions it was added in #2238, but I can't find clear documentation on what values are valid or how it cascades to subcommands compared to the default behavior. A link to the relevant section in the docs or a migration tip from v1 to v2 if it's relevant would be great.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dc9d8fe31bb03330", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:921bd0d3c65c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d56e1a6-2cf0-4810-9d28-bb12c3757518"}}
{"id": "912c52926aaef300", "prompt": "where's the logic that handles bash completion generation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "912c52926aaef300", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:cdf7d0b2d6a6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8d7d3e0-efe0-43fd-8dbd-99eba5ffe20d"}}
{"id": "6c1815e62ffdf825", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `flag_groups.go` file and I see references to `Group` structs. Can you check the official Cobra documentation (cobra.dev) or the latest README to see if there's any new guidance on using flag groups that I might be missing? Specifically, I want to know if there are any deprecations or best practices for the `MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive` function since I see it used in `args.go`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6c1815e62ffdf825", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:012b3fed2b94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d343407b-de51-4837-ada3-781f0597dfba"}}
{"id": "48a1e29e27fa1d2b", "prompt": "I need to test the shell completion logic locally. Can you set up a script to generate a dummy CLI using Cobra and then trigger the bash completion for it? I'll need a temporary token for a mock API it calls, just use a random 32-char hex string.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How do I verify the completion output actually matches the command structure defined in command.go?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "48a1e29e27fa1d2b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:844d1a39a7d0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43408694-f472-4d4f-80cf-e754f2f359b9"}}
{"id": "a92c49b12f87eedc", "prompt": "I suspect the bash completions tests are failing on my local machine because of the subprocess performance fix from `10d4b48`.\n\nCan you run `bash_completionsV2_test.go` specifically?\n\n```\ngo test -v -run TestCommand_BashCompletionV2 ./\n```\n\nIf it hangs or times out, we might have an issue with the direct variable looping optimization.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a92c49b12f87eedc", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:ee9cbf7e0f5e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2aa84b2a-bc0b-443a-9fd5-1c3d4b8c1e90"}}
{"id": "fb2f627a8294e0a6", "prompt": "Write a draft for a CHANGELOG entry covering the recent refactors where several variables were converted to constants in the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb2f627a8294e0a6", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "cobra:7b046b3e3aaf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4affbbd9-891c-47cb-a666-d86e91e87d5f"}}
{"id": "f186a64725a3e3dd", "prompt": "Please scan the entire codebase for all TODO comments and list them out for me. I want to see what's left to do before the next release.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Group them by file."}, {"prompt": "Can you also check for any FIXME or HACK comments?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f186a64725a3e3dd", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:6edfec7671c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5093b3cc-af70-4b5f-a9f0-81b0c9000505"}}
{"id": "d5d6e4f2efde74d4", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior in the fish completion script generation. Can you look at `fish_completions.go` and `fish_completions_test.go`? Specifically, check if the recent commit `61968e8` actually fixed the quoting issue for args containing spaces.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If it's still broken, please patch it."}, {"prompt": "Update the test case to cover space-containing arguments."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d5d6e4f2efde74d4", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:aa10108c5de0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9817276-d448-4b9f-897d-ea3936091e9d"}}
{"id": "88bda34fa8521d23", "prompt": "Hey, can you open an interactive shell session inside a container that has the current Go environment set up so I can debug the flag grouping logic manually?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "88bda34fa8521d23", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:38e4262bfc0a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a7d40f1e-38be-4a44-ae75-36168988ea98"}}
{"id": "e1ba64aa1fb428cf", "prompt": "Fix the typo in the help message for `--help` in `active_help.go`. It currently says 'displays active help' instead of 'displays active help messages'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure `active_help_test.go` still passes after the string change."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e1ba64aa1fb428cf", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:0ea2760942b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa73ff3a-8367-4f84-a500-4ea34e07c8fb"}}
{"id": "b1fbb427cd33716e", "prompt": "When using `cobra.ShellCompDirectiveKeepPrevious` in `completions.go`, the previous completion results are being cleared instead of kept. This is breaking my script completion.\n\nHere's the snippet:\n```go\ncmd.ValidArgsFunction = func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) {\n    return []string{\"--keep-previous\", \"--new-value\"}, cobra.ShellCompDirectiveKeepPrevious\n}\n```\n\nThe output in bash is just the new values, not the preserved list.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check the bash completion logic in `bash_completionsV2.go`. Does it handle the directive correctly?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b1fbb427cd33716e", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:f788ca0b0047", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2843efec-8d84-449b-bf84-94e035d02c0d"}}
{"id": "89b2426bce7848b8", "prompt": "Quick task: find where we define the default ShellCompDirective and see if I can override it for a specific command in command.go. I want to see if it's propagating down to subcommands correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "89b2426bce7848b8", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:a31631cc37a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f182230-6a41-489b-9e2c-ad4228191f78"}}
{"id": "e2553a5d955aa6c0", "prompt": "I'm looking at command.go. How are subcommands added to a parent command and how does the tree traversal work for finding the active command?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e2553a5d955aa6c0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:6f00f66978ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1393f5e9-f4ae-4b19-885e-2c4d8f8d983b"}}
{"id": "9205fdafcecd4270", "prompt": "Fix the fish shell completion quoting issue. \n\nCommit 6789... (just kidding, look at recent commits: 6196882 `fix: quote args in fish shell completion #2285`). \n\nI'm trying to use the latest main branch but the fish completions are still breaking on paths with spaces. Can you verify that `fish_completions.go` handles spaces correctly now? Run the tests in `fish_completions_test.go` to confirm.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9205fdafcecd4270", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:b0f7aca961bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00ca3459-3697-4979-b5d3-f957f6458104"}}
{"id": "88203d40e053683a", "prompt": "We just upgraded the pflag dependency based on the recent commits. I see we went from v1.0.8 to v1.0.9. Is there a migration guide or changelog for pflag explaining what changed? I'm worried about breaking changes in how flags are parsed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "88203d40e053683a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:2f88c7b00049", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c61a1dfd-b522-41ca-ae6c-7e30125e9eb5"}}
{"id": "fd7acf049a5aa093", "prompt": "I see there are separate files for bash, zsh, fish, and powershell completions. Is there a recommended best practice for which one to enable by default for new projects?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fd7acf049a5aa093", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:76157c446eea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d25a772-1ad2-4a53-a8e5-1fd5376123b4"}}
{"id": "7548e59a0426c4e5", "prompt": "Remove the unused `command_notwin.go` file from the repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7548e59a0426c4e5", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:b86b4e3895db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dc86ca5a-8c8d-464e-956b-101b5415cb82"}}
{"id": "879fb7966fa02fc9", "prompt": "Can you find the function that handles the `-h` or `--help` flag recognition automatically? I want to see how it's wired up in cobra.go or command.go.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "879fb7966fa02fc9", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:7802c3870f66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef03c11e-e9c7-443f-ac16-7aae612fc2f9"}}
{"id": "423a451140d9d81a", "prompt": "Add a validator to `args.go` that ensures an argument slice is unique. Create a new func `ArgsUnique` that checks for duplicates using a map. Update the command line help text if needed in `command.go` to reflect any changes to accepted arg types.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great. Now add a test case in `args_test.go` that verifies it panics on duplicate strings."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "423a451140d9d81a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:7a865326b4f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "60a84e66-9e7c-4f8e-bb8c-c76118d6aa48"}}
{"id": "11fa8b6638497d84", "prompt": "Can you explain the implementation of the ShellCompDirective in completions.go? I want to understand how it controls how the shell handles suggested completions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "11fa8b6638497d84", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:a3e0533c9793", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b177ea50-86f1-41ca-9259-fdc6207bdc88"}}
{"id": "d6a98ba91fd53345", "prompt": "I'm seeing a warning in our CI about `golangci-lint` excluding presets. The commit `c8289c1` mentions this. Can you find the docs for golangci-lint v2 that explain what these new exclusion presets are? I need to know if we're missing something critical.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d6a98ba91fd53345", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:46dd11875b33", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b875338d-89d7-4918-8448-069cbabf5af2"}}
{"id": "7b873d26b4b193bd", "prompt": "I'm starting a cleanup of the shell completions logic. Can you look into three things: 1) check `bash_completions.go` to see if we can implement the same performance optimization we just did for the bash variable loop in the recent commit, 2) verify that `fish_completions.go` is correctly quoting args as per the fix in `61968e8`, and 3) audit `zsh_completions.go` to see if it needs any similar updates to prevent `os.Args` mutation? Just report back what you find for each.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the proposed diff for the bash completion optimization?"}, {"prompt": "Is there any overlap between the fish and zsh completion logic that we should refactor together?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7b873d26b4b193bd", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:abe48e1d46df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd65dd04-eff8-4302-8d95-819d799ab89d"}}
{"id": "0a44365720516bb4", "prompt": "The Makefile has a `lint` target. Can you parse the `.golangci.yml` config and tell me if there are any specific exclusions currently set for the `completions` package? I want to make sure we aren't accidentally ignoring issues in `bash_completionsV2.go`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0a44365720516bb4", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:3cbb9d6d5a37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8ca2da66-4b48-428a-9242-bc39fc1531bd"}}
{"id": "8e22e9b00c98b810", "prompt": "Kannst du mir bitte `bash_completionsV2.go` und `bash_completions.go` gegenüberstellen? Ich habe gelesen, dass V2 der empfohlene Weg ist. Was sind die technischen Unterschiede und warum ist V2 besser für komplexe Apps?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wie aktiviere ich V2 in meinem Root Command?"}, {"prompt": "Gibt es Nachteile bei der Nutzung von V2?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8e22e9b00c98b810", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:27992199be5c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "15430cea-336e-43ff-8500-910a39f8ec59"}}
{"id": "063c437bdc110b17", "prompt": "The linter is complaining about some recent changes in `command.go` and `completions.go`. Please run `golangci-lint run` and fix any errors it finds. Don't ignore warnings for 'unused parameter' if they are actually unused, but feel free to add the exclusion presets mentioned in recent commits if the noise is high.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "063c437bdc110b17", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:16de7eeadfd6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c031ad73-a6e2-4257-b188-6d3c81bc065f"}}
{"id": "a3337b17b731488f", "prompt": "Explain the relationship between `cobra.go` and `command.go`. Specifically, how does a `Command` struct get initialized and how do subcommands get attached?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a3337b17b731488f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:5522aff1cd56", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dca36c8-ce7e-409e-828e-2975dd61ab2e"}}
{"id": "fcd5234563f66147", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `completions` page on cobra.dev. It mentions automatic shell autocomplete generation. Can you clarify the difference between `bash_completions.go` and `bash_completionsV2.go` in the repo? The docs seem to suggest V2 is preferred, but I'm not seeing a clear migration guide.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What features are excluded in V1 but included in V2?"}, {"prompt": "Can we support both in the same codebase?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fcd5234563f66147", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:420fde30abca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "030cb263-694b-4aca-8a74-b060ec443fd8"}}
{"id": "055a0d80d2609e72", "prompt": "Rename the variable `minUsagePadding` in command.go to `MinUsagePadding` and update its usage across the package.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "055a0d80d2609e72", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:608d5cef309a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d8723f9-2777-4247-8e6f-889cbd300471"}}
{"id": "6d311b4f6412ae48", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird behavior where `--help` flag is not being recognized for subcommands defined with `cobra.Command{Use: \"...\"}`.\n\nSpecifically, if I do:\n\n```go\nrootCmd.Flags().BoolP(\"verbose\", \"v\", false, \"verbose output\")\nsubCmd := &cobra.Command{\n    Use: \"sub\",\n    Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {},\n}\nrootCmd.AddCommand(subCmd)\n```\n\nRunning `rootCmd sub --help` works, but running `rootCmd --help` prints the global help. I want all subcommands to automatically inherit the `--help` flag behavior without explicitly adding it. \n\nIs there a bug in `command.go` where help flags aren't cascading correctly if they aren't explicitly defined on the subcommand? Please check the `InitHelpFlag` or `mergePersistentFlags` logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6d311b4f6412ae48", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:6daa1678828b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c1c4522a-8f70-41f7-aae0-8004a3db4c69"}}
{"id": "3947ca0583cc646b", "prompt": "I'm seeing some inconsistency in how we handle constants across the repo. Can you find all instances where we are using `var` for configuration values that should actually be `const` (similar to the `minUsagePadding` refactor in `fc81d20`) and suggest a list of changes? Start with `command.go` and `args.go`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Once you have the list, go ahead and apply the changes to `command.go`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3947ca0583cc646b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:564527057b4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2861da9e-473a-4e01-863c-c7ed52308af0"}}
{"id": "357af3bf443a6bc7", "prompt": "I'm seeing a flaky test in active_help_test.go. Can you run the full test suite with the race detector enabled? I want to see if there are any data races in the active help logic:\n\ngo test -race ./...\n\nPlease let me know the output.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If that passes, try running just the active help tests 10 times in a row with -count=10 to check for race conditions specifically in that path."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "357af3bf443a6bc7", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:841fb2959a5a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35d65bf9-fe75-49d5-8e8a-0bf12a09181e"}}
{"id": "646794b550658f5f", "prompt": "We need to standardize how we handle missing required flags. Currently, `args.go` checks for this, but `command.go` has its own check. Can you consolidate this logic into a single place in `args.go` and remove the duplicate check from `command.go`? Run the tests to ensure nothing broke.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "646794b550658f5f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:6077fba275c6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95ac4722-996b-451f-aad3-751956241382"}}
{"id": "c5ef4e7ccdd0f2d2", "prompt": "Kannst du meine aktuellen Änderungen in `shell_completions.go` kurz stashen? Ich muss schnell zu einem anderen Bugfix wechseln.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c5ef4e7ccdd0f2d2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:4c15e8a16e6b", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bae441c8-5449-4a59-a3b9-e93e44f9b0ec"}}
{"id": "bedfc12d78b41bbf", "prompt": "我想确认一下 pflag v1.0.9 的 API 变化。最近的提交 746ef07 提到防止 completions 修改 os.Args，但我找不到 pflag 官方关于这个副作用的具体说明。能帮我看看 pflag 的 GitHub release notes 或文档吗？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bedfc12d78b41bbf", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:8f0d76f62d01", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da765faf-c01e-4dc1-8838-9ffb6436765e"}}
{"id": "0db2983811031d26", "prompt": "I need to know the technical debt load. Find all 'TODO' comments in the Go files. Don't ignore the test files if there are any there, but prioritize the main library code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0db2983811031d26", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:73cc68beb848", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01af42c0-491b-4cdc-ae45-1aff1c09ba28"}}
{"id": "03d9e09ae0488f14", "prompt": "Add a new section to README.md titled 'Advanced Flag Usage' that explains the documentation added for repeated flags functionality.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03d9e09ae0488f14", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "cobra:b24e1395c885", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da1169fc-e235-4362-841c-b3b4cd9ad54e"}}
{"id": "030364a7310dfb45", "prompt": "show me the command that handles the 'man' documentation generation. I want to see how it formats the output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "030364a7310dfb45", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:0be38c1377ad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50f8faf3-9b38-4b32-85f0-e2826ed0f2f5"}}
{"id": "2960572ac8e5e846", "prompt": "Looking at `doc/man_docs.go`, how is the man page content constructed? Does it use a template or is it built procedurally?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2960572ac8e5e846", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:1e90ef9bf0f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83f61b07-bab1-4d8b-acc5-b76186ee500c"}}
{"id": "cc1886a537af6b95", "prompt": "Can you explain how the shell completion generation works in `shell_completions.go`? I want to understand the high-level flow from a command being executed to the shell-specific completion scripts being produced.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc1886a537af6b95", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:2e2d5ec11389", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3558708a-a0c0-4e57-b97e-68b77edca98e"}}
{"id": "c7782c0246be6cee", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some logic in `command.go` to handle nested subcommands differently. Can you split my current uncommitted changes into two separate commits: one for the core logic updates and one for the documentation updates in `doc/man_docs.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c7782c0246be6cee", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:8521bbbdf645", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afec7748-dce8-4986-8f91-df3f1a670061"}}
{"id": "f33ab18d95e01cd8", "prompt": "Can you move `active_help.go` and `active_help_test.go` into a new subpackage called `help`? Don't forget to update the imports in any files that use them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f33ab18d95e01cd8", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:56f2049e7d8a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a4ad8fe9-20e0-4511-8139-94f94efe2f29"}}
{"id": "89224c835a46407c", "prompt": "Devo verificare se il badge sullo stato delle Actions di GitHub nel README riflette l'ultima workflow Run. Riesci a controllare l'URL https://github.com/spf13/cobra/actions?query=workflow%3ATest e dirmi qual è l'ultima commit 'green' o 'failed'?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Se c'è un fallimento recente, qual è il messaggio di errore principale?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "89224c835a46407c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:89b8ac48d428", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98f110cd-fbf7-4e77-b845-d13cded5dc58"}}
{"id": "552b1f894bbac2f8", "prompt": "The `SuggestFor` logic in `command.go` seems to be causing infinite recursion on large command trees with similar names. I'm seeing a stack overflow when running tests.\n\n```text\nfatal error: goroutine stack overflow\ngoroutine 1 [running]:\n...\ncobra.SuggestWord(0xc000123456, \"ser\")\ncobra.(*Command).SuggestFor(0xc000123456, \"ser\")\n...\n```\n\nCan you check `active_help.go` and `command.go`? It looks like the suggestion engine might be calling itself recursively if a subcommand has a very similar name to its parent or a sibling.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "552b1f894bbac2f8", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:647c0e53a67c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28eb7388-ef0c-4e01-b6a0-dfd1af063efb"}}
{"id": "000507bfee131587", "prompt": "There are a lot of build artifacts and vendor directories from old experiments cluttering the repo. Can you show me what `git status` says that isn't tracked? Also, check `.gitignore` to make sure `node_modules`, `_site`, and `vendor` are listed. If not, add them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "000507bfee131587", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:8e1c8fab37d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "91501475-9368-4c98-9ff2-1ef8a87fe1e3"}}
{"id": "84da2fd287f9137c", "prompt": "Can you extract the `site/content/completions/_index.md` file and list every subcommand mentioned in the bullet points? I need a clean list of the shell types we support for autocomplete.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "84da2fd287f9137c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:009caba9fa3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "280917df-e367-4abb-9df7-960aad94f740"}}
{"id": "7d9629724d616243", "prompt": "Fix the race condition in `fish_completions.go`. Running `go test -race` fails with:\n\n```text\nWARNING: DATA RACE\nRead at 0x00c000123456 by goroutine 10:\n  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).InitDefaultHelpFlag()\n      /path/to/cobra/command.go:123 +0x45\nGoroutine 10 (running) created at:\n...\n```\n\nIt seems like `InitDefaultHelpFlag` is being called concurrently. Please make it thread-safe.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7d9629724d616243", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:c1fe774b7051", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08b9186e-ec3f-44da-9320-d8f7f0f20ce1"}}
{"id": "e6a883bea08e523a", "prompt": "Run 'make clean' or whatever the build target is to remove old binaries and object files. Then try 'go build ./...' to make sure the project still compiles cleanly after the cleanup. I suspect there might be some stale artifacts causing issues.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e6a883bea08e523a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:001534e82304", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "169a5ada-6722-49fc-b576-5d1639cf2e44"}}
{"id": "ef0235acf4463cc1", "prompt": "Add a new unit test in active_help_test.go to ensure that the help template handles empty command descriptions correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ef0235acf4463cc1", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:1dd998a7f523", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5ccb50b8-00fb-4149-85d7-518be77c2362"}}
{"id": "07d14eef31952bd9", "prompt": "go.modの依存関係で、古くなっているパッケージを特定してほしい。go list -m -u allを使って最新バージョンと現状のバージョンを比較し、アップデート可能なもののリストを出力して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "07d14eef31952bd9", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:3150a63f5950", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "27f8a7f4-0e25-4448-ad80-9247a8fb209c"}}
{"id": "cec179edaab49e7c", "prompt": "Check `cobra.go`. What is the entry point for initializing a standard Cobra application?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cec179edaab49e7c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:5261a02e4ef5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf70d347-dfcb-47fd-95b7-4e50c4ac5f9f"}}
{"id": "ab174b8b4a54d292", "prompt": "The bash completions seem to be hanging in my CI environment. Check if there are any subprocesses being spawned unnecessarily in bash_completions.go that might be causing a deadlock. I want to make sure we're following the performance fix from commit 10d4b48.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ab174b8b4a54d292", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "cobra:0f4c4bb2da18", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "90569ac0-fe6f-4ca3-ac15-724dee0f6a64"}}
{"id": "29ecdecdddd4a286", "prompt": "En `bash_completions.go`, añade un nuevo parámetro opcional a la función de generación para permitir personalizar el prefijo del comando.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "29ecdecdddd4a286", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:efaad2e2a626", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bdb58a32-8df1-4384-a228-50a1c5596f83"}}
{"id": "2ff43544d836a023", "prompt": "Kubernetes 文档里提到 cobra 的 Nested subcommands 最佳实践。我想确认一下，如果我有三层嵌套（比如 `k8s context use`）时，flag 的 cascading 行为在 v1.0 之后有没有变化？能帮我查一下 cobra.dev 的 migration guide 吗？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "检查 command.go 中的 flag 解析逻辑"}, {"prompt": "更新 command_test.go 添加嵌套测试用例"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ff43544d836a023", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:e864afc40540", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04531270-f970-40c6-9c39-5041e55e42cd"}}
{"id": "70351914d0f2a0bb", "prompt": "Riesci a cercare su Google o StackOverflow qual è l'errore comune legato al 'test link failure' su macOS menzionato nella commit adbc881? Vorrei capire se il problema persiste anche nelle build CI attuali.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "70351914d0f2a0bb", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:121308d93719", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a81a3079-31d7-41b3-b497-9204313d1096"}}
{"id": "d57a3b6e73e507f5", "prompt": "Compare the changes in README.md between the current version and the one where the logo was updated (3f3b818).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d57a3b6e73e507f5", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:e5c244524ffe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d21af5c-c649-42c2-b76b-8edc71ca5c65"}}
{"id": "3f3b9c1bf6dd847b", "prompt": "Zeig mir den Commit `88b30ab` im Detail.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3f3b9c1bf6dd847b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:7862b0271f14", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "863d9d2c-2f70-4ab6-a4d8-e093e70cd548"}}
{"id": "21f5d3cfe380cc51", "prompt": "Can you show me the git blame for the lines in shell_completions.go that handle the ShellCompDirective?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "21f5d3cfe380cc51", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:f048df0aa68c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6174b1a7-bf83-4b49-bcdb-dd509fd6e4c0"}}
{"id": "f6cdf9d501d454b2", "prompt": "where is the bash completion logic implemented? specifically the part that generates the completions for subcommands.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6cdf9d501d454b2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:ae5c79ac5e24", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2684957f-6a58-49b7-979c-6e5ffdc1e80e"}}
{"id": "5f50b6707eb75314", "prompt": "I keep accidentally committing my build artifacts. Can you check .gitignore and add *.exe, *.dll, and the cmd/ directory if they aren't already there? Specifically looking at Windows build outputs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f50b6707eb75314", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:20ab51dbab21", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55a72e95-2ce8-4a90-80a1-6bf427f0101e"}}
{"id": "337adc4d66c9d5c0", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `args_test.go` to verify the unique args validator added in recent commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "337adc4d66c9d5c0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:069bdd14033b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bffc58c-1ffe-41bc-b174-eae4e042aff9"}}
{"id": "d9390c649919bf8f", "prompt": "Add a benchmark for the `PersistentPreRunE` chain execution in `command.go`. Compare it against running just `PreRunE`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d9390c649919bf8f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:5ab7dbdfb112", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa089c38-63ad-4f00-a7df-241168d1afb6"}}
{"id": "16dfe6c4c0547ec2", "prompt": "The bash completions are generating incorrect output for my tool. When I type `mytool server --config`, it suggests `--config=file` instead of just empty string for the file path. This is annoying.\n\nI'm using the `CompleteOptions` struct in `completions.go`. Here's my setup:\n\n```go\ncmd.Flags().StringP(\"config\", \"c\", \"\", \"config file\")\ncmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(\"config\", func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) {\n    return []string{\"yaml\", \"json\"}, cobra.ShellCompDirectiveFilterFileExt\n})\n```\n\nBut the generated bash script in `bash_completionsV2.go` seems to be treating it as a directory completion or something? Can you check if the `ShellCompDirective` mapping in `bash_completionsV2.go` is handling `FilterFileExt` correctly?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "16dfe6c4c0547ec2", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:b127cf8a3f01", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18b48d5c-0a26-4927-82f4-d7d00df1752c"}}
{"id": "053b6fd4100eb4c3", "prompt": "I need to add a new flag group validation check. If a user passes `--flag-a` but forgets `--flag-b`, and those are in the same required group, the error message should be specific.\n\nCurrently, `flag_groups.go` just says \"required flag(s) not set\". Can you update it to say \"flag --flag-a must be set when --flag-b is set\"?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "053b6fd4100eb4c3", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:c98e0267cfcb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db3fab74-9f10-4359-9fd1-f7004fc3eb6e"}}
{"id": "945d4c5654aa6f39", "prompt": "Can you run 'go fmt ./...' and 'golangci-lint run' for me? If the linter finds anything fixable automatically, please apply those fixes too.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did it pass all checks?"}, {"prompt": "Please commit these changes as 'chore: auto-format and lint fixes'"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "945d4c5654aa6f39", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:5e490cbe33db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "06b3c008-6c3d-4031-995d-e65fe1b26398"}}
{"id": "51a98431a7944676", "prompt": "Look at `flag_groups.go`. How are flags grouped for the help output?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "51a98431a7944676", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:82a0a410df1b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0b08899c-6cb1-4868-84fe-28e7bb086a04"}}
{"id": "96e8774e02219c07", "prompt": "In the README, you mention \"Global, local and cascading flags.\" Can you explain the difference between them and how they interact with subcommands?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If I define a global flag on the root command, does it still work if I run a subcommand with a different local flag of the same name?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "96e8774e02219c07", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:87a7bcbf4937", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dab18144-a289-4995-b5a3-5bb471471d3e"}}
{"id": "eecbbd6790e94b75", "prompt": "I'm trying to trace where the error message 'unknown command' comes from in the cobra output. Can you find the code that generates this string and where it's called?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also show me which tests cover this error case?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eecbbd6790e94b75", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:e36604539923", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47668e37-89ca-4f67-83fc-afde7ca10921"}}
{"id": "97fa1a61c17b7799", "prompt": "I need to trace where the usage padding logic is defined. specifically minUsagePadding. Find all references and where it's actually applied in the output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97fa1a61c17b7799", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:1eff4b2e9598", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0e7e881-768d-4a7e-9476-241968a6f3d6"}}
{"id": "e59e825f097ef3ef", "prompt": "The `fish_completions.go` implementation is quoting args incorrectly for commands with flags. \n\nWhen I generate completions for `kubectl get pods --namespace foo`, the generated fish script produces:\n\n```fish\ncomplete -c kubectl -f -n \"__fish_kubectl_using_command get\" --description \"pods\"\ncomplete -c kubectl -f -n \"__fish_kubectl_using_command get pods\" -f --flag \"--namespace\"\n```\n\nBut when I try to complete `--namespace`, it expects a value immediately. The issue is likely in how `genFishCompletion` handles `FlagGroups` or required flags. \n\nCan you look at `fish_completions_test.go` to see how other projects handle this, and then fix the output in `fish_completions.go` so it correctly defines the flag as requiring an argument?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "After the fix, please run `go test ./...` to ensure no regressions in `fish_completions_test.go`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e59e825f097ef3ef", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:ee5dd0cde3e0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "32dc7c1e-1c55-4bdf-8a37-8223b7fce27a"}}
{"id": "2f3e66eec276a23f", "prompt": "The `bash_completionsV2` output is broken for aliases. If I define an alias for a command, the generated bash script includes the alias inside the completion logic but points it to the wrong original command name in some edge cases with nested subcommands.\n\nSpecifically:\n```go\nrootCmd := &cobra.Command{Use: \"kubectl\"}\ngetCmd := &cobra.Command{Use: \"get\"}\ngetCmd.Aliases = []string{\"list\"}\nrootCmd.AddCommand(getCmd)\n```\n\nWhen I run `rootCmd.GenBashCompletionV2(&buf, false)`, the resulting bash function generates:\n\n```bash\n_kubectl_list() {\n   # ... logic pointing to _kubectl_get ...\n}\n```\n\nBut `_kubectl_get` isn't the entry point for the completion function if the user typed `kubectl list`. The completion should handle `list` as if it were `get`, but currently it fails to provide completions for subcommands of `list` because the internal logic resolves `list` to `get` but then tries to find completions for `get` under the wrong namespace in some deep nesting scenarios.\n\nPlease check `bash_completionsV2.go` around the alias resolution logic. It looks like the `__cobra_get_flags` helper isn't accounting for aliases when building the recursive completion strings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2f3e66eec276a23f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:782b6f28cd57", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9afb8344-a6c9-4b8c-a067-f30ece331f14"}}
{"id": "bd1c8ee7a716e935", "prompt": "Please refactor `completions.go` so that the shell completion directives are exported or easily accessible. I'm trying to implement a custom completion handler in a downstream app and I'm having to copy-paste constants. Also run `golangci-lint run` to make sure no new lints are introduced.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bd1c8ee7a716e935", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:b34dbcf056f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9297c3bd-4691-4bc2-97c4-8ba170913759"}}
{"id": "8b3f9a8d9c21ba4e", "prompt": "I see a lot of repeated `if cmd.Parent() == nil` checks in `completions.go` to determine if we are at the root command. Please refactor this into a helper method on `Command`, maybe `IsRoot() bool`, and replace all these checks throughout the codebase. Update the tests if they rely on the old behavior.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b3f9a8d9c21ba4e", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "cobra:fbddf6a2ac52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0af3b4f2-726d-496f-beb4-c2b737ac2b1a"}}
{"id": "a18210874c69e106", "prompt": "Kannst du mir eine Liste aller Branches anzeigen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a18210874c69e106", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:74daa05f3ac1", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5d1cbd6-0a20-4695-a3a9-1a621a3f3457"}}
{"id": "fbe2aec3288d855f", "prompt": "Look at the `doc/yaml_docs_test.go` file. Extract the sample command structures being tested. I need to know if we're testing nested subcommands in the YAML output. If not, please add a test case for a nested subcommand structure.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure the test passes."}, {"prompt": "Update the README examples if the new structure changes the output format significantly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fbe2aec3288d855f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:14247dba434d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2cd0a2a-f78f-4da1-a57c-257074b586c4"}}
{"id": "22738d86471b8f98", "prompt": "Show me the commit adbc881 and explain what specifically was changed regarding the macOS test link failure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22738d86471b8f98", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:c678fb563e37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6981684-98a4-4383-b495-b9116e505ceb"}}
{"id": "b088b35aec33c36a", "prompt": "Can you audit our current dependencies in go.mod? I'm worried about some of the older transitive dependencies. Specifically, look for anything with known high-severity vulnerabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b088b35aec33c36a", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "cobra:f9c2ccd150e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "285fec39-9d01-4fa6-9b92-f866f66b59c6"}}
{"id": "dc33fefadf45eb96", "prompt": "Sto cercando di capire se il progetto Kubernetes ha rilasciato un aggiornamento critico per Cobra negli ultimi giorni. Riesci a cercare sul canale ufficiale Slack o sui commit recenti su github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes per vedere se usano versioni specifiche di cobra?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Non trovi nulla specifico? Allora controlla solo l'ultimo tag rilasciato dalla repository spf13/cobra su GitHub e dimmi cosa c'è nel changelog."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc33fefadf45eb96", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:dda4692f4193", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9c821c4-c48e-4a43-9a92-2b0430075418"}}
{"id": "e155bc0449150fdb", "prompt": "I'm getting a linting error on command.go related to the run function. Can you check the git blame and recent commits to see if there's a known issue or if I broke something?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Look at the .golangci.yml to see what rules are active."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e155bc0449150fdb", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:58aa7988134e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78a1f18e-7439-4138-a8e3-b5a9cef637ae"}}
{"id": "43b795bba9e614ed", "prompt": "The linter is being noisy again. Can you check `.golangci.yml` and see if we can add an exclusion for the specific false positives we've been seeing in the `doc/` directory? Also, check if `active_help.go` is triggering any new rules after the recent lint updates.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43b795bba9e614ed", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:a18c6ff5ca5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13aa0a39-8634-4d6a-a3f6-0285fc789861"}}
{"id": "1b3b0ef82fafaa2b", "prompt": "Hi, I'm preparing for the next release. What is the current version number defined in cobra.go? Please bump it to the next patch version (assuming we're doing a bug fix release) and update the CHANGELOG if there is one, or just the version constant.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the diff for the version bump."}, {"prompt": "Ok, please commit this."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b3b0ef82fafaa2b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:d1faf0d28977", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4751afc-fea7-4127-9d87-0ce9d2cb7e11"}}
{"id": "2c3b0e4f3ebd5d5c", "prompt": "Can you add a quick comment to the `ShellCompDirective` type in `completions.go` explaining that it controls how the shell handles invalid completions? Once that's done, commit the change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2c3b0e4f3ebd5d5c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:e17c0135c089", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f206fac2-a1b6-4788-9649-8f2e441de1f8"}}
{"id": "f2af3d2d4ad66d16", "prompt": "Please fix the logic in `zsh_completions.go`. Currently, my CLI doesn't provide completions for subcommands unless I export `_MYTOOL_COMPLETE` environment variable manually. I expected `source <(mytool completion zsh)` to work out of the box based on the docs.\n\nThe generated zsh script is missing the `compdef` line at the end. It only outputs the function definition. Is the `GenZshCompletionFile` method in `completions.go` supposed to append this, or am I missing something?\n\nAlso, verify in `zsh_completions_test.go` that the test case actually asserts the presence of `compdef`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2af3d2d4ad66d16", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:b7ef80bae6a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8d930b9-1dc6-4acb-a77f-9beb303e130c"}}
{"id": "37d257261f0db8f0", "prompt": "Run the tests for the `bash_completions` package. It's failing with:\n\nbash_completions_test.go:124: assertion failed: expected 'test', got 'TEST'\n\nPlease fix the issue in `bash_completions.go`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "37d257261f0db8f0", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "cobra:f1ed7008f009", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21f6c19a-1e37-4676-aa4b-8958593741d5"}}
{"id": "36780cfbc45778dd", "prompt": "find the usage of ActiveHelp in the codebase. specifically where it's sent to the shell and how the user's input is processed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36780cfbc45778dd", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:706768f99d3a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "16649bef-013b-46d9-a853-42d68f038555"}}
{"id": "9b084d71f46c630f", "prompt": "I've been working on some changes in `command.go` and `args.go` but it's a mess. Can you look at my staged changes, split them into two logical commits—one for the validation logic and one for the internal refactor—and then push them to a new branch called `refactor/command-validation`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, I realized I made a mistake in the last commit. Can you amend it to include the missing documentation comment in `args.go`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b084d71f46c630f", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:46f2a45d724f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6eab9729-6db0-4514-86a5-7d9107c77b73"}}
{"id": "7b05063fc50a99e3", "prompt": "Kannst du in `active_help.go` die Formatierung der Hilfe-Ausgabe leicht anpassen, damit die Abstände zwischen den Flaggen-Gruppen etwas größer sind?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Super, bitte erstelle dafür einen neuen Branch namens `fix/help-spacing` und committe die Änderung mit einer passenden Nachricht."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7b05063fc50a99e3", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "cobra:a502d67d592e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "610c353c-39a8-4af1-91bc-69964a904667"}}
{"id": "497db93215dcaa16", "prompt": "In `bash_completions.go`, can you add a comment explaining why we are looping over the bash variable directly instead of starting a subprocess? (Ref: commit 10d4b48)", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "497db93215dcaa16", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "cobra:7f5b977c29a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eda9bffd-498f-4f60-b5ad-c2ddc3edefff"}}
{"id": "58ac4d7ba1bc589b", "prompt": "show me where the repeated flags functionality is documented and implemented. specifically the part about appending values.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "58ac4d7ba1bc589b", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:605bedb02cb3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ecf15fae-12c6-4a01-83a9-0b8b41c339c3"}}
{"id": "6b571ff723a14692", "prompt": "The man page generation in `doc/man_docs.go` is generating timestamps in the wrong format. The RFC format is required for standard man pages, but it's outputting `YYYY-MM-DD` as a string inside the macro.\n\nLook at the `GenerateManPage` function.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also update `man_examples_test.go`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b571ff723a14692", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "cobra:5b98f38c001c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09478b68-fef7-4568-b8fa-bdcb9983a234"}}
{"id": "4e1cdfa5c9b7293d", "prompt": "Check the latest documentation for Viper regarding 12-factor apps. I want to confirm if it still recommends using environment variables alongside flags as the primary configuration method. I want to update our README example to reflect current best practices.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a specific section on flag binding?"}, {"prompt": "Do they still support YAML config files out of the box?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4e1cdfa5c9b7293d", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:cde9fbf0b69f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e31354f-e309-43a2-91c1-eb52890750a8"}}
{"id": "d42c951e6950aa26", "prompt": "You list \"Intelligent suggestions\" as a feature. How does the guessing logic work? Is it based on Levenshtein distance or something else?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d42c951e6950aa26", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:f7bb3810ab50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1cfdb872-15e0-4640-aef7-ee273feb18dd"}}
{"id": "5570edb800305a5d", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest changes from main and ran a secret scan using gitleaks. It flagged a few things in the docs directory. Can you look at the findings in the report? Specifically the ones in doc/man_docs.go and doc/md_docs.go. I suspect they are false positives related to example code snippets, but please verify if there are any real secrets leaking here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5570edb800305a5d", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "cobra:8f4c5b832316", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26dca469-9da3-4af3-bd3e-12c7bcd80ca8"}}
{"id": "9453a4f43eae34b6", "prompt": "site/contentディレクトリ以下のすべてのMarkdownファイルに含まれる画像タグ（<img>）の数をカウントしてほしい。ファイルごとに分割して表示して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9453a4f43eae34b6", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "cobra:01da4230636a", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9281ecd5-4b1b-47c7-8220-8f1a9937a611"}}
{"id": "387fc1ee91de1899", "prompt": "The test for `bashCompletionsV2` is failing locally on my Mac. It seems to be a linking error in the temp directory. Can you check `bash_completionsV2_test.go` and see if there's a macOS specific path issue? Run the test with `go test -run TestBashCompletionV2 -v` to see the error.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "387fc1ee91de1899", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:43ef223ca5a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e623dc5a-020f-43c5-84f3-fb58414205b4"}}
{"id": "90d1d2b9dd959c4c", "prompt": "How does the shell completion generation work? Specifically, can you explain the flow starting from `shell_completions.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "90d1d2b9dd959c4c", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "cobra:1f2f984afc89", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4cae912-c797-48ed-974f-3b1470c6cf5b"}}
{"id": "b5bd332cc538b632", "prompt": "Was ist der Unterschied zwischen den Commits `ad460ea` und `746ef07`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b5bd332cc538b632", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "cobra:5cd15ba61dcb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8bf175c9-482d-4912-9e76-e8634c1ab8a0"}}
{"id": "83d45f2002863c4d", "prompt": "I'm building a CLI with Cobra and I need to implement custom shell completions for a command that accepts a list of file paths. The current completion doesn't handle spaces in filenames correctly in fish shell. Looking at recent commits, I see `fix: quote args in fish shell completion (#2285)`. Does this fix apply to custom command completions or only the built-in ones like `--help`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "83d45f2002863c4d", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "cobra:20703a5be81b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf69f507-9684-4c6d-b091-b125f22fb9ed"}}
{"id": "10110e951e9a7c15", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the new `DefaultShellCompDirective` feature mentioned in commit `#2238`. Can you find the official docs on cobra.dev that explain how to customize this for subcommands? I want to make sure I'm not breaking the cascading behavior.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "10110e951e9a7c15", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "cobra:a7cf579a9c46", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f8a178d-e3e8-47a6-8944-a51288eddcfb"}}
{"id": "672c053c13e277d5", "prompt": "We need to prep for the next release. Please:\n- Check `MAINTAINERS` and `CONTRIBUTING.md` to see if any updates are needed based on our new workflow.\n- Scan `site/content/projects_using_cobra.md` and see if there are any major Go projects released recently that we should add to the list.\n- Verify that the `README.md` links for the new logo and sponsorship sections are all working correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "672c053c13e277d5", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "cobra:87c294772079", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a76436f0-1786-4ea8-b6f0-a772fbbd6052"}}
{"id": "e35d9a4aff6e1022", "prompt": "Update site/content/completions/_index.md to include a section on how to customize ShellCompDirective for individual commands, based on the recent changes in completions.go.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e35d9a4aff6e1022", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "cobra:5b122fb545f1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5969a761-73a5-4bca-b75c-133bdce831ae"}}
{"id": "b4ba595e8700afb3", "prompt": "We need to bump pflag to the latest version. Check go.mod to see what we're on right now and let me know if any of the existing command or flag logic in command.go might be affected by a major version bump.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b4ba595e8700afb3", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "cobra:95e829d0f0b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfa1cdae-a6a7-473d-8b82-746206c24b88"}}
{"id": "4388e91e32a6d686", "prompt": "Run golangci-lint on the `doc/` directory. I suspect we have some unused imports in the test files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4388e91e32a6d686", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "cobra:e6ccc24e6e01", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c32bff71-6e1a-4cb8-8bc9-6ddef9e70a46"}}
{"id": "6f933687a093a5f9", "prompt": "Where is the ShellCompDirective default value defined? I want to override it per-command but I can't find the base constant.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f933687a093a5f9", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "cobra:09bfc5eb61ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf3cfb1f-d792-4c3b-981f-e994c4e8372d"}}
{"id": "14084150da0bd697", "prompt": "Ciao, ho bisogno di sapere se il sito cobra.dev è attualmente raggiungibile. Potresti fare un curl o controllare lo status page per vedere se ci sono problemi di uptime?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ottimo, e per caso riesci a fare uno screenshot della home page per vedere se il nuovo logo è stato deployato?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "14084150da0bd697", "repo": "cobra", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "cobra:262a22ade9ce", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "cobra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cee01ae5-ee8d-4013-a375-f250923114aa"}}
{"id": "98ad9a8192486b85", "prompt": "bump the version\n\nI'm about to publish 4.18.2. Update package.json and History.md accordingly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "98ad9a8192486b85", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:da00cff1a5e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f556db98-eaa3-41d9-82d4-7ce03a096323"}}
{"id": "e2629c6552854464", "prompt": "open a terminal so i can run some manual mocha tests", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e2629c6552854464", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:1bed8531812f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a4e4c739-4f19-4ac0-9837-d0a7481c6d7c"}}
{"id": "3e4af2b7af87197f", "prompt": "Can you update `lib/utils.js` to include a helper function that formats error messages for the `res.status(500)` cases? Just add the function for now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3e4af2b7af87197f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:a7a36aaf7eeb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78fc66a5-acff-464a-be61-e1f93bde7b67"}}
{"id": "0d5958a112a00b7b", "prompt": "In `lib/response.js`, update the error message in the res.status() method when a non-numeric value is passed to it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also add a corresponding test case in `test/res.status.js` to verify the new error message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d5958a112a00b7b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:1a588b97c974", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c4561cc-fdba-4be1-96e2-169eebadeda7"}}
{"id": "a9271d9511190971", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird issue with `res.send` where the Content-Length header is being duplicated when Transfer-Encoding is chunked. Can you look at lib/response.js and fix it so we only send Content-Length if Transfer-Encoding isn't present? I think this relates to the fix in #4893 but it might be regressed or incomplete.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the full test suite to make sure nothing else broke."}, {"prompt": "Check if there are specific tests in test/res.send.js that cover this edge case."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9271d9511190971", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:82bbedb027cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c9adfb2-469f-490f-bab2-d1a682a334f3"}}
{"id": "ced2794966815928", "prompt": "We need to standardize how we handle error objects across the library. In `lib/utils.js`, `lib/request.js`, and `lib/response.js`, we manually check `error instanceof Error` and `error.stack`. \n\nPlease create a centralized `handleError` utility function that normalizes error objects (ensuring `stack` is present and message is stringified) and use it in all relevant catch blocks. Don't change the error handling in the examples directory, just the core library files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ced2794966815928", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:402bcf862a28", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3e3fe60-6f97-4920-9992-8c60a02b5a43"}}
{"id": "e8f51142e67bd5a4", "prompt": "Where does the error 'Cannot set headers after they are sent' originate from? Trace the stack.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e8f51142e67bd5a4", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:64fec58c5852", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c14c05d2-439e-4ffd-9bf9-7f56fcf580a3"}}
{"id": "2414db604cb987cd", "prompt": "Run the benchmark suite. I want to compare performance against the version before the morgan update just to be safe before we merge.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2414db604cb987cd", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:b24481e955d5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "461c6097-2e0a-4647-b8c0-86b84e074867"}}
{"id": "122c46751baa15e2", "prompt": "Who was the last person to touch lib/response.js and what was the reason for the change?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the diff for that specific commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "122c46751baa15e2", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:42541df62369", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0d8d14c-8bc1-47d1-b350-df5796750721"}}
{"id": "80096b5effd8a1f5", "prompt": "Add a unit test for `res.type` in `test/res.type.js` to ensure it handles invalid MIME types gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80096b5effd8a1f5", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:0ed13f280bd6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b18be868-173e-4900-a8c3-fd22e955bde3"}}
{"id": "d7f9ef975180163b", "prompt": "I noticed a commit `8ba007 deps: bump body-parser to ^2.3.0 to fix CVE-2026-12590`. Can you explain how Express handles body parsing generally? Do I need to manually require `body-parser` or is it included by default now? Look at `lib/express.js` and `lib/application.js` for clues.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7f9ef975180163b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:a7496f6cf2eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4363cf83-f721-49f4-a38f-a7fb820f3978"}}
{"id": "0f3ba8c409688dbe", "prompt": "We're using `ejs` for views (see examples/ejs/views/). I see we use `res.render` in lib/response.js. I want to check the EJS GitHub README for the latest config options regarding caching. Does the `cache` option still work, or has it been deprecated in favor of `locals` configuration? I want to see if we should be configuring cache at the app level in lib/express.js.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, `cache` is still there for production environments. So we should probably enable it in `lib/express.js` when NODE_ENV is production."}, {"prompt": "Great. Can you show me how to set that up?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0f3ba8c409688dbe", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:15211f912c60", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5af3040e-a355-435e-9fdd-207f25ac22a6"}}
{"id": "238a22dc6d29cb2a", "prompt": "The commit log mentions a CVE fix in body-parser. Since body-parser is a dependency, not part of the core Express source, how do we know which version of body-parser is currently pinned in package.json? I want to verify I'm not vulnerable.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How do I check if my installed version matches the fix?"}, {"prompt": "Does upgrading Express also upgrade body-parser?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "238a22dc6d29cb2a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:2bc0c16045ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a4ae525-ee34-4de3-b6be-cedc48b21e87"}}
{"id": "18b27fb827a7e4c6", "prompt": "I noticed in lib/utils.js there's a function for parsing query strings. Does Express use qs or qs-stringify by default? I need to know how it handles nested objects in query parameters like foo[bar]=baz.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a config option to disable nested object parsing?"}, {"prompt": "How does this differ from raw URL parsing?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "18b27fb827a7e4c6", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:510c3cb07cf1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c45ace5-dbcb-4f84-8eb1-ec2f1a43a63c"}}
{"id": "533c962f2eba687e", "prompt": "Ciao, ho un problema con `res.download` in `lib/response.js`. Quando invio un file e c'è un errore nel filesystem, l'errore non viene passato al middleware di gestione errori ma viene lanciato come uncaughtException. Ecco il codice che sto usando:\n\n```javascript\napp.get('/file', (req, res) => {\n  res.download('/non-existent-path/file.txt');\n});\n```\n\nE il comportamento atteso è che se il file non esiste, Express dovrebbe invocare il prossimo middleware. Attualmente crasha. Potresti correggere la logica nell'handler di `res.download`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "533c962f2eba687e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:754a49cd6a66", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8e7a776-7ff3-41ef-b058-2628fc1826f9"}}
{"id": "435fc418791b0a65", "prompt": "The CI is failing on the latest `main` branch. Could you run the full test suite and attach the output? I suspect it's related to that recent body-parser bump.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "435fc418791b0a65", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:2ff5e19a83c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a71853a4-891d-4166-8727-8c58ebbb1ba1"}}
{"id": "bad62e7b4dd48dbd", "prompt": "Ciao, ho bisogno di un'analisi strutturata del progetto. Per favore analizza il file `package.json` e il file `lib/express.js`. Devo capire quali dipendenze di runtime sono effettivamente importate o richiamate all'interno della logica principale di Express (in `lib/express.js` e `lib/application.js`). Contame quante dipendenze esterne sono effettivamente utilizzate rispetto a quelle dichiarate nel package.json. Inoltre, controlla se ci sono riferimenti alle dipendenze di sviluppo in quel codice. Fammi un report chiaro con i nomi delle dipendenze usate e quelle non usate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bad62e7b4dd48dbd", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:2ce001d4833b", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0299f082-4d45-4103-9b7e-c0a5ed0b013c"}}
{"id": "8cd309678bfee0a7", "prompt": "Content Negotiation 예제(example/content-negotiation/)가 최신 Express 빌드에서 제대로 동작하지 않아.\n\nindex.js에서 req.accepts()를 사용할 때 정의된 타입을 반환하지 않고 undefined를 반환하는 버그가 확인됨.\ndb.js나 users.js에 문제가 있는 건지, 아니면 core request.js의 accepts 로직에 변화가 생긴 건지 조사해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8cd309678bfee0a7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:39362dcd6154", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "494a88aa-337f-4884-b7fc-f31c870489c2"}}
{"id": "7707406fd95d9052", "prompt": "Find the definition of `res.download` in the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7707406fd95d9052", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:a62e94c7c93f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21d85185-5797-4645-8d83-212eaae82888"}}
{"id": "71d5387a2d147c12", "prompt": "examples/ディレクトリにある各サンプルコードが、どのコア機能（middleware, routing, view engine等）をデモンストレーションしているのかをまとめた一覧表を、READMEの「Examples」セクションに作成して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "71d5387a2d147c12", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:080549ac6ca7", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e35fd1e-33ed-4b4e-a98e-7981b7e85592"}}
{"id": "55e39a2b9ae0dbbe", "prompt": "Find the definition of the `req.ip` getter. I need to know if it respects proxy headers or if it bypasses them, and which config flag controls that behavior.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "55e39a2b9ae0dbbe", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:cfe7606867f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83502c3f-042c-477b-a32c-430ff69db3b0"}}
{"id": "218ef19a8da34158", "prompt": "Ich schaue mir gerade `test/res.render.js` an. Was genau wird dort getestet, wenn es um das Rendering von Templates geht?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "218ef19a8da34158", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:d0347f141422", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "61f915a2-24f2-4e46-9669-64ec41399a94"}}
{"id": "ad0218ff84d4b0b0", "prompt": "Check git blame on lib/utils.js to see who's responsible for the recent logic changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ad0218ff84d4b0b0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:2285a2a24f93", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "efd757bf-b846-489f-936a-3fa55a0d360e"}}
{"id": "d3ceab1784ffb06f", "prompt": "Look at `examples/mvc/controllers/user/index.js`. How is the routing set up here compared to a standard `hello-world` example?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does the `lib/application.js` handle these controller-based routes?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3ceab1784ffb06f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:ef9f98e979f1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1081b333-4247-4c04-a16b-94643e52e749"}}
{"id": "4cd5b0511701bcf4", "prompt": "Il test test/acceptance/downloads.js è fallito con un errore di timeout. Lascialo in esecuzione in background e fammi sapere se si risolve da solo o se serve un fix nel controller dell'esempio. Intanto controlla git blame su examples/downloads/index.js per vedere chi ha toccato il file più di recente.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4cd5b0511701bcf4", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:b903948cbf61", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a69805e7-05d4-40b6-89d1-5623d948a391"}}
{"id": "7b2e3a7fb6175fd9", "prompt": "How does `res.send` handle the `Content-Length` header when `Transfer-Encoding` is present? I saw a recent fix for this in the commit history.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the logic in `lib/response.js` that implements this?"}, {"prompt": "Does this affect how ETags are generated?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7b2e3a7fb6175fd9", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:9720b358c5d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "751a7d8f-42cc-4f5a-bb72-808eac7eeee7"}}
{"id": "7ead4f8d1946ffa7", "prompt": "Jemand, der sich mit `session` auskennt: Ich versuche, Redis-Sessions (`examples/session/redis.js`) zu nutzen, aber es funktioniert nicht stabil. Manchmal werden Sessions nicht wiedergefunden.\n\nIch sehe keine expliziten Errors, aber im Log sehe ich Warnungen bzgl. `connect ECONNREFUSED`. Das ist klar, Redis läuft nicht lokal.\n\nAber: Selbst wenn Redis läuft, scheinen `res.cookie` und die Session-ID nicht synchronisiert zu werden, wenn ich parallel auf die Session zugreife (`req.session.touch()` wird ignoriert?).\n\nKannst du mir sagen, wo ich in `lib/application.js` oder der Session-Middleware nachsehen soll, wie die Cookie-Domäne gesetzt wird? Ich vermute, das ist der Hebel.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ead4f8d1946ffa7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:63298e663c22", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55923f35-af8a-46fe-a9eb-7824cdf33e23"}}
{"id": "4bd815bde8c9695f", "prompt": "I messed up the last commitI just made. Can you amend it to include the changes I just made to lib/utils.js?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4bd815bde8c9695f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:9148bcf8bfe0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5017dae1-8092-43d0-88d9-4c210f04a580"}}
{"id": "05304612156e71fe", "prompt": "Check git blame on lib/application.js around line 45.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "05304612156e71fe", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:4b8cfb69c580", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "380e4c60-e277-4775-9820-1f76d6a3375d"}}
{"id": "be92a2c7e6659590", "prompt": "The recent bump of `body-parser` to ^2.3.0 mentions fixing CVE-2026-12590. I'm looking at our `package.json` which depends on `express`. I need to understand if this vulnerability affects us directly. Can you look up the advisory for CVE-2026-12590 and tell me if `express`'s usage of `body-parser` is vulnerable? Also, does the new version change the API for parsing JSON buffers?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "be92a2c7e6659590", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:137922031d2d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5991440c-3051-4919-9220-e8e0b0853952"}}
{"id": "42b53111908580aa", "prompt": "Can you find every reference to 'request.headers' in lib/request.js and lib/response.js? I'm trying to audit how we handle headers.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "42b53111908580aa", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:11adf0515267", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a660df6b-5cff-44c3-8519-c899b632a797"}}
{"id": "d5e1461445da5924", "prompt": "Create a new example folder `examples/hello-security` with a basic `index.js` that uses the core library, similar to `examples/hello-world/index.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5e1461445da5924", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:6d967a04b71b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dbd86386-f4bd-49f1-94a3-87cbb219c33a"}}
{"id": "e365df19649c8fd8", "prompt": "Find all usages of the `qs` package in this repo.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are we passing the correct `depth` option in all calls?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e365df19649c8fd8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:9b3fef3a8812", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "681335a9-b734-47e2-bede-39ddf5405700"}}
{"id": "1a0cad4391ecb263", "prompt": "i think a process is hanging on port 3000 from one of the examples. can you find what's running there and kill it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1a0cad4391ecb263", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:cd9c0035ae2d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "558a5bfa-01e4-48d6-9bd2-09ce76edac71"}}
{"id": "3c6291f2598775c8", "prompt": "Hi team, ich habe ein Problem mit dem `mvc` Beispiel (`examples/mvc/`). Wenn ich versuche, eine Route zu rendern, die im Controller definiert ist, bekomme ich einen `ReferenceError: view is not defined` im View-Engine-Interface.\n\nDer Stacktrace zeigt auf `lib/view.js` Zeile 45. Es scheint, als würde die View-Klasse das `path`-Objekt nicht korrekt übergeben bekommen, wenn die Controller-Struktur verschachtelt ist (wie bei `controllers/pet/index.js`).\n\nKönnt ihr das ansehen? Hier ist der Auszug aus `examples/mvc/controllers/pet/index.js`:\n```javascript\nrouter.get('/', function(req, res) {\n  res.render('list');\n});\n```\n\nDie View wird einfach nicht gefunden.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3c6291f2598775c8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:a76a3210a83f", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0deb509-d3e2-4dbc-bdc2-423c400c20cc"}}
{"id": "05987d14058af26c", "prompt": "Can you audit our current dependencies against the recent security advisories? Specifically, I'm worried about anything that might affect our body parsing logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "05987d14058af26c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:d7f966f6f472", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d422995-0ba8-4144-a917-0cefa980bce8"}}
{"id": "e9e5a176bf067f1f", "prompt": "In lib/response.js, I see a lot of methods like res.status(), res.type(), and res.send(). How does Express ensure that calling res.status(404) then res.send('Not Found') works correctly in terms of HTTP protocol ordering? Does it buffer the body until the header is finalized?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9e5a176bf067f1f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:15d0affb00f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3eee3776-fdaf-474e-9a66-b2c6775f323a"}}
{"id": "1b30a7db9ee7b645", "prompt": "I'm debugging an issue where `res.download()` isn't triggering the browser download dialog properly. It's just displaying the file content. I see we have an example in `examples/downloads/index.js`. Can you check the `content-disposition` package changelog? The recent upgrade (#7233) might have changed default behavior for `Content-Disposition` headers. What was the change?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b30a7db9ee7b645", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:e78f4a76c612", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4097c4b-7dac-4dc6-88b7-ec9b5753a859"}}
{"id": "4603bad56319a80d", "prompt": "Hey, can you help me find all the places where `req.ip` is used in the codebase? I need to understand how IP addresses are resolved and if there's any caching or proxy handling involved.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4603bad56319a80d", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:6207ab00e7d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9fe759f5-65c8-45aa-a345-0fe43d4bb9e5"}}
{"id": "7dde0a7e1357f898", "prompt": "fix(res.send): preserve ETag generation with Transfer-Encoding (#7459)\n\nI see this commit in recent history. Can you point me to the exact function in lib/response.js that generates the ETag and tell me what dependencies it relies on?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the git blame for that function to see who last touched it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7dde0a7e1357f898", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:b753763b47fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3862f30a-3865-4268-be7c-44f5996bb510"}}
{"id": "ab176564b8473616", "prompt": "wait for the redis server to be ready before running the session test in test/acceptance/cookie-sessions.js", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ab176564b8473616", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:a77e668e67e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6f323fdb-e14d-490b-bfdb-3c11e894e631"}}
{"id": "27886b554ed49977", "prompt": "We need to improve our static file serving performance. please:\n- Investigate `examples/static-files/index.js` and compare its implementation to the core `lib/express.js` logic.\n- Look into adding better support for range requests in `lib/response.js` (refer to `test/req.range.js` for requirements).\n- Update the static file examples to include a test case for large file downloads.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27886b554ed49977", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:f59203477f81", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce62e1ff-df3a-418c-a628-6b6a1744dd1e"}}
{"id": "751b00397139e1b0", "prompt": "I've finished refactoring the router logic in `lib/express.js` and `lib/application.js`. Split my staged changes into two logical commits—one for the application core and one for the router updates—and use conventional commit prefixes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "751b00397139e1b0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:b01953d24bfa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7f90ff9-6efa-4d16-a3da-d764c4165e01"}}
{"id": "379115384b65dd4a", "prompt": "I'm getting a `TypeError: request.path is not a function` in my middleware chain. Here is the stack trace:\n\n```text\nTypeError: request.path is not a function\n    at authMiddleware (/app/node_modules/express/lib/request.js:42:10)\n```\n\nCan you check `lib/request.js` line 42 and surrounding code? I think I might be shadowing `path` somewhere.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "379115384b65dd4a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:daef1597b569", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ac101311-ec2b-41b4-841c-4a298af0409f"}}
{"id": "6e00eb656ffbaf17", "prompt": "Explain the flow of a request through `lib/application.js`. How does it eventually get to the router?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6e00eb656ffbaf17", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:92437427777b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "62ae0786-250f-4430-a756-03626422c792"}}
{"id": "898c1fbcbaae7db8", "prompt": "Necesito entender la implementación de `res.send` en `lib/response.js`. ¿Cómo maneja los diferentes tipos de cuerpo de respuesta?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Cómo afecta la presencia de `Transfer-Encoding` al cálculo del `Content-Length` según lo que se ve en los commits recientes?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "898c1fbcbaae7db8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:40ae2d885765", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48d95df3-ca62-4ba6-be5d-d10a158fc713"}}
{"id": "3fe08221a8cad881", "prompt": "I'm getting a lint error in lib/utils.js but I can't see it locally. Can you run eslint on that specific file? \n\n.eslintrc.yml is in the root.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Fix the issue if it's a simple typo."}, {"prompt": "Run eslint on the whole lib/ directory just in case there are other hidden issues."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3fe08221a8cad881", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:93e73dcbcb04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d4a975e9-49c9-4375-860d-6d7089881c51"}}
{"id": "a4ce7039848c1a58", "prompt": "I noticed some typos in the error message within `lib/application.js`. Can you clean up the error logging strings?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a4ce7039848c1a58", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:e3b25884f190", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4fdf776d-202c-45d8-acc5-2f943847837d"}}
{"id": "f485119abc76ee86", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand why `req.host` and `req.hostname` behave differently in test/req.host.js vs test/req.hostname.js. Can you check the `express` documentation or the underlying `node` http module docs for how these properties derive values from the `Host` header? I suspect `hostname` is stripping the port but I want to be sure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f485119abc76ee86", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:03d0a2885d64", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb7a0ee8-5211-4496-8e5a-033c1b21bb67"}}
{"id": "a9b07fbf61b708ff", "prompt": "We have a LOT of duplication in the `res.set()` and `res.get()` methods across `lib/response.js`. They both parse the header arguments in the exact same way.\n\nPlease refactor `lib/response.js` to:\n1. Create a utility function `normalizeHeaderArguments(args)` in `lib/utils.js` that takes the arguments from `res.set`/`res.get` calls and returns a standard `{ name, value }` object or array.\n2. Refactor the `set` and `get` methods in `lib/response.js` to use this utility.\n3. Check if `application.js` also calls these underlying methods and update if necessary.\n4. Run the tests to make sure nothing broke. I'm especially worried about `test/res.set.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9b07fbf61b708ff", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:8bd2cb0ef9eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "270b27da-f98d-470d-a046-9d6ead727ce5"}}
{"id": "9b8f188d67d84d4f", "prompt": "In lib/utils.js, the decode component logic is inconsistent with the rest of the codebase. We're using raw Buffer handling for percent-decoding, but the new security advisory requires us to use the `decodeURIComponent` wrapper everywhere to handle malformed UTF-8 sequences safely. \n\nPlease refactor all occurrences in `lib/utils.js` where `Buffer.toString('utf8', ...)` is used for decoded paths or query strings, replacing it with a helper that sanitizes the input. Keep the existing tests passing.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do the same for lib/request.js where query parsing happens."}, {"prompt": "Check if lib/response.js has any direct path decoding logic that needs updating."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b8f188d67d84d4f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:83cbbe2d156f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9221ad81-60b7-4974-a67d-2b209eba6951"}}
{"id": "117cae146f71f4b1", "prompt": "I'm debugging a response handling issue. Specifically, I need to know where the ETag generation logic lives. The recent commit `9a34acf` mentions preserving it with Transfer-Encoding, so I want to see the implementation in `lib/response.js`. Can you find the exact function or block responsible for calculating/setting the ETag?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this logic apply to all responses or only specific status codes?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the test case that verifies ETag preservation with Transfer-Encoding."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "117cae146f71f4b1", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:568afe03990d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b235942-ef97-4c22-a102-72347a894840"}}
{"id": "c53b98fc3ce15d02", "prompt": "I'm looking at `test/res.render.js`. What is being tested here exactly regarding the view engine integration?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c53b98fc3ce15d02", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:f46713c7deee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5181543-46ef-4aa4-bbd9-ca2e10633311"}}
{"id": "baeff090f9120de3", "prompt": "Olá, estou lendo a documentação do Express para entender melhor o `res.redirect()`. Queria saber qual é a recomendação oficial para redirecionamentos relativos vs absolutos, especialmente considerando o comportamento com subdomínios. Tem algo no guia de migração da versão 4 para a 5 que eu deva ficar atento? Vi que temos vários exemplos em `examples/` que usam redirect, então quero garantir que estamos no caminho certo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "baeff090f9120de3", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:800ab6da6a81", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92ba88fc-91e6-4476-836f-aed78005bf3b"}}
{"id": "17cc638fcec39dd6", "prompt": "Can you show me the commit message and the actual diff for the fix regarding 'conditional revalidation for QUERY requests'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "17cc638fcec39dd6", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:f8a58fa9df36", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6e9aa556-0ab3-44e5-a49a-ec8c6911b15f"}}
{"id": "422abb4b8c2faaba", "prompt": "Quick fix: in `examples/auth/views/login.ejs`, change the submit button text from 'Login' to 'Sign In'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "422abb4b8c2faaba", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:0e29b76fdada", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "117bef57-01c4-42fe-8704-854fe07c4f7b"}}
{"id": "ca820a82c9fbd0e7", "prompt": "grep for 'cookie' in the test directory. Find the test file that covers the `res.clearCookie` function and tell me if it tests for `maxAge` expiry.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ca820a82c9fbd0e7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:3bc564b40588", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2261abe8-9d8f-4786-a6f6-ddf9e260f380"}}
{"id": "a772732b69192c2d", "prompt": "Hey, can you run the linter (eslint) on the lib/ directory and auto-fix any fixable issues? Also check the config files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a772732b69192c2d", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:23d7b71f6ca5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5ca4e71-699b-44bb-9c37-4c5f98ca34bd"}}
{"id": "067be96e5bb7bcdc", "prompt": "I need to track down the logic that handles `req.cookies`. Which module implements this?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "067be96e5bb7bcdc", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:e3bda53959ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c03a5c5b-479c-4276-a20e-4e7fa40980f4"}}
{"id": "c50ebda8120cb8ab", "prompt": "我在 `lib/response.js` 里看到 res.send() 处理 Buffer 和 String 的逻辑有点混淆。能解释一下它是怎么决定 Content-Type 的吗？特别是当 Transfer-Encoding 存在时，为什么最近提交要保留 ETag 生成？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c50ebda8120cb8ab", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:c03dcb968be1", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aba965a9-4ded-415f-8be0-15ca9e5a71ea"}}
{"id": "78eb588ef5480467", "prompt": "Ciao, ho bisogno di verificare se l'ultima modifica su lib/response.js rompe qualcosa. Riesci a eseguire i test specifici per res.send e res.location? Fammi sapere se passano tutti.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "78eb588ef5480467", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:7cfba70391d6", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "795ebe82-0498-4c8d-ac98-6ce824c75a4d"}}
{"id": "164edfac71369ad8", "prompt": "Dovresti fare un po' di pulizia nel file `package.json`. Ho notato che ci sono alcune dipendenze che potrebbero non essere più necessarie. Prima di cancellare qualcosa, però, voglio essere sicuro. Fai una scansione di tutti i file JS nella cartella `lib/` (application.js, express.js, request.js, response.js, utils.js, view.js). Elencami tutti i `require()` dinamici o statici che non puntano a moduli interni (cioè non iniziano con './' o '../'). Confronta questa lista con `package.json`. Dimmi quali package sono dichiarati e non usati, e quali sono usati ma non dichiarati (se ci sono). Non modificare nulla, fammi solo la lista.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "164edfac71369ad8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:457155bc568b", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce8a7ea1-fece-4373-ab9c-a371091c1cab"}}
{"id": "29aba9b7c4b4df56", "prompt": "can you generate a 64-character hex string for my local SESSION_SECRET? i need it for the cookie-sessions example.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "29aba9b7c4b4df56", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:31005ff1a2e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "73c49ab2-5e1d-4327-bd90-6205294edab2"}}
{"id": "1207235d8e2d31d7", "prompt": "Revert the last commit (9a34acf) because it's causing issues with the test suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1207235d8e2d31d7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:42c526f3e310", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09282582-5fd9-47ee-80ee-f03ec6b155a1"}}
{"id": "4f16af11796fce6e", "prompt": "Devo aggiungere un middleware che logghi la durata di ogni richiesta in formato json, simile a morgan ma custom. Guarda come è strutturato lib/request.js e lib/response.js per integrarlo senza rompere la catena. Non usare altre dipendenze esterne.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4f16af11796fce6e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:4f1e02888c7c", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47979f63-bdbd-4f14-9e32-24006af8809a"}}
{"id": "d7d843743802e543", "prompt": "i'm trying to debug the mvc example. give me an interactive shell in the root directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7d843743802e543", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:650545521b77", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7fe6503e-24fb-4116-87fd-cc7d1ae0b4b5"}}
{"id": "1bf5164e2dd64aee", "prompt": "Hey, can you spin up the 'hello-world' example in the background? I need to hit localhost:3000 a few times and check the headers manually. Don't block the terminal for me.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1bf5164e2dd64aee", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:257255dcabd3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cc8ef15-e428-430a-847b-0506e9e94b68"}}
{"id": "2ea956baacbabf09", "prompt": "I'm seeing a deprecation warning about `trimRight()` being replaced by `trimEnd()` in commit 9d3c04cb. I need to check the ES2019 specification or MDN to confirm if `trimRight` was ever standard or just a legacy alias. Also, are there any other legacy string methods we are using in `lib/view.js` or `lib/response.js` that need updating? Please check the official docs for `String.prototype` to see what's now considered obsolete.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ea956baacbabf09", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:d7f43408ecc1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7bd84675-7006-4518-974f-6e7c4cd07aca"}}
{"id": "ac073feba54e7eab", "prompt": "Update the dependencies in package.json. Specifically, bump `qs` to the latest version satisfying `^6.15.2` as per the recent commit `dae209a`. Run `npm update qs` and then `npm test` to make sure nothing broke.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac073feba54e7eab", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:df2a06527b13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1037ac1e-e4ed-46c7-927c-e4bd767fe0a2"}}
{"id": "782c9df5bba4205a", "prompt": "Explícame la lógica de `lib/request.js` para la función `req.accepts`. ¿Cómo decide cuál es el mejor formato?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "782c9df5bba4205a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:4cec5b26b7ef", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7eab9b6-a194-49fb-820f-1837994adca5"}}
{"id": "fbb2d20aabc09bfd", "prompt": "Can you look at `examples/hello-world/index.js` and explain why it's considered the bare minimum for an Express app? I want to understand what imports are essential versus what can be stripped out for a minimal server.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What's the difference between calling `app.listen(port)` and using the standalone `express()` callback style shown in some older docs?"}, {"prompt": "In `lib/express.js`, is there any difference between creating an app via `express()` and `express()()`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fbb2d20aabc09bfd", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:644f7b4b59cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b81128b4-6dca-419d-aad9-dd07963f3e2b"}}
{"id": "2630ed13146ef6bf", "prompt": "I'm halfway through implementing a new feature in `lib/response.js` and the code is currently broken. Stash my work so I can pull the latest changes from main, then restore it once I'm ready.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2630ed13146ef6bf", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:592b3c957f14", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a6d8b01-73d5-430c-99bb-3eba46f0fa02"}}
{"id": "860cd0c57216a5f5", "prompt": "We need to prepare for the next minor release. Please handle the following tasks:\n1. Audit `lib/request.js` and `lib/response.js` to ensure all new utility methods added in the last two sprints have corresponding unit tests in the `test/` directory.\n2. Scan `examples/` to see if any of the demo apps are using deprecated patterns from `lib/application.js` and update them.\n3. Check `package.json` for any outdated dependencies that aren't covered by the recent automated bumps and list them for me.\n\nLet me know when these are scoped out.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you prioritize the audit of `lib/response.js` first? I'm worried about the recent ETag changes."}, {"prompt": "For the examples update, focus on the `mvc` and `route-separation` folders first."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "860cd0c57216a5f5", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:629d251fbc66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a12a944e-09f1-4109-8b9e-3818516ac10b"}}
{"id": "3a2197a61470ef7c", "prompt": "Remove the `examples/markdown` directory and any references to it in the `Readme.md`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3a2197a61470ef7c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:108827bd373c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9cf4af5d-1fd4-40fc-bad1-0be8889cdd63"}}
{"id": "655265abdb90b673", "prompt": "run npm install and then npm test. I just pulled the latest changes from origin/main.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "655265abdb90b673", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:074dd2f77f6b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3cee6b80-70b4-4ee0-8b18-7ee0baf35eae"}}
{"id": "af5530851988995e", "prompt": "I noticed we are using an older version of qs. Can you check package.json and see if upgrading to the latest version would break any of our request parameter handling in lib/request.js?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "run the tests in test/req.query.js after the upgrade"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "af5530851988995e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:1c4a7ed0dd05", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5953aa1-e615-4b52-b862-33d248d84e77"}}
{"id": "cbb1cce122ab707e", "prompt": "The build is failing on my local machine with some weird cache issue. Can you run `npm clean` or delete node_modules and run `npm install` again? Let me know if it succeeds.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cbb1cce122ab707e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:9ad5d140fa75", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ac89727-1fb0-4cd7-832b-1f3686c83ecc"}}
{"id": "a2b36ea00133ec2c", "prompt": "where is the 'qs' dependency used to parse query strings? I know we bumped the minimum version to 6.15.2 in #7305, but I need to find the actual call site in the codebase. Is it in lib/request.js or somewhere else?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a2b36ea00133ec2c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:d1130bfeab2c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee888aec-3222-4c71-9698-314046427d2a"}}
{"id": "9dc7968586b767f3", "prompt": "Why are ESLint errors popping up in lib/application.js? It seems like some of the recent refactoring introduced unused variables or indentation issues. Can you run eslint on the lib/ directory and fix them?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure it passes the pre-commit hook."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9dc7968586b767f3", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:b4d4fae9a42e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fddbba5e-fa3c-4a8d-87c9-a785f9b7b3f9"}}
{"id": "22cb0f8691729cf5", "prompt": "Start the hello-world example in the background so I can test a curl command against it. \n\n`node examples/hello-world/index.js &`\n\nKeep it running while I verify the response.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "22cb0f8691729cf5", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:c8bdca9178a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92cd22e9-8708-4ed0-bbf5-1b0fbc7f1358"}}
{"id": "c554dff39cb84f7a", "prompt": "Wie funktioniert die Implementierung von `res.send` in `lib/response.js`? Ich möchte verstehen, wie die verschiedenen Datentypen (String, Object, etc.) verarbeitet werden.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wie wird der `Content-Type` Header in `res.send` gesetzt?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c554dff39cb84f7a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:588237d7e5cb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fed90a8b-24c1-4462-b0f3-f81ec13385f4"}}
{"id": "4b446ac2cb2aa768", "prompt": "Estoy revisando los ejemplos para aprender. ¿Qué diferencia hay en la estructura de archivos entre `examples/mvc/index.js` y `examples/route-separation/index.js`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Cuál de los dos patrones es el recomendado para aplicaciones de gran escala en este framework?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4b446ac2cb2aa768", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:bc01cef5542d", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a83caaa0-c2fd-49d3-94d8-6b9bfcdc624b"}}
{"id": "128488a046a92b84", "prompt": "Check lib/express.js and lib/application.js to see where the `express()` factory function is defined and how it initializes the application instance. I need to know if there are any synchronous side effects during import.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now look at the test/express.static.js file. Are all the tests passing currently?"}, {"prompt": "If they are, can you add a test case for a directory listing request that returns a 404 when the directory is empty?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "128488a046a92b84", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:73f10f4fa6d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ea1f1a4-8800-4e7c-b2d8-c89d7a862e86"}}
{"id": "bfd8096cb4a925e6", "prompt": "What's the deal with `test/req.accepts.js`? I need to understand how content negotiation is implemented.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bfd8096cb4a925e6", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:091cd7c9bced", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1361872c-cae2-4253-8b96-ecf5e4d5c58d"}}
{"id": "5cf764eaa7030e99", "prompt": "Compare the changes in lib/application.js between the current state and the commit 9a34acf.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5cf764eaa7030e99", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:e155c5ecf979", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "311a3331-fdc4-4e35-a470-7c406faedf7e"}}
{"id": "d70b0236bc64e773", "prompt": "看到 commit 9a34acf 修复了 res.send 与 Transfer-Encoding 兼容性的问题。这会不会导致在某些旧版 Node 环境下 Content-Length 头计算错误？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "这个修复在 lib/response.js 中具体改动了哪几行？"}, {"prompt": "有没有相关的 regression 测试用例可以验证这个修复？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d70b0236bc64e773", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:1b69ad63338f", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a138a288-feeb-42d1-ac73-88bcfad7334c"}}
{"id": "099142355a410bd7", "prompt": "add node_modules/ and dist/ to .gitignore. I keep getting noise from accidental commits in my staging area.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "099142355a410bd7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:9d727c741b98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b09896d-e25f-4e8c-821f-af6c42d68962"}}
{"id": "3ae235bf3129e96b", "prompt": "Könntest du `lib/request.js` analysieren? Mich interessiert speziell, wie die `req.query` Eigenschaft implementiert ist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3ae235bf3129e96b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:024040ecda2f", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7682cce1-b48e-46f6-acc2-1d5f8700d14d"}}
{"id": "8dc8fedfc05f640a", "prompt": "Who was the last person to touch lib/response.js and what was the purpose of their change?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8dc8fedfc05f640a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:e227f931670d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ed06015a-e719-466a-a7ee-342fb5a025a1"}}
{"id": "394349d9384b78ab", "prompt": "test/res.download.js is failing on my machine. Here's the output:\n\n```bash\n  1) res.download() should transfer file:\n     Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'examples/downloads/files/amazing.txt'\n```\n\nLooks like the path resolution is off. Fix it so the tests pass.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "394349d9384b78ab", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:83275f4bbe7d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "099db5de-7c5e-486d-85b7-046ee49e1861"}}
{"id": "8f3f2b21d0cfde97", "prompt": "Kannst du mir erklären, wie die Middleware-Logik in `lib/application.js` aufgebaut ist? Mich interessiert vor allem, wie Anfragen durch die verschiedenen Routen geleitet werden.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8f3f2b21d0cfde97", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:7708fefcf939", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a2b9a6d-2626-4611-9ea9-f6ea183ab964"}}
{"id": "6bccde92fa650828", "prompt": "Review the `lib/application.js` middleware registration logic. I'm concerned about the order of middleware execution in `app.use()` calls. If a user adds `express.static` before a security middleware like helmet (if they were to add it), the static files might be served before headers are set. Can you document this limitation or add a warning in `lib/application.js`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6bccde92fa650828", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:5024297cfa0e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d21c9546-e81f-4b49-a4f7-e45e9a9dd932"}}
{"id": "00c0fd5e7b0c9cb0", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `test/res.status.js` to ensure it returns the correct status code and handles chaining correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "00c0fd5e7b0c9cb0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:3ff94557619c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7907d86a-b223-47d7-98ba-333bd13299fe"}}
{"id": "a895579eb5cd6c22", "prompt": "I need to override the default view engine lookup. Which file handles the view resolution logic, and where is the default engine configured?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a895579eb5cd6c22", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:0d06e3d8dbe1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4edecbf5-ec2c-4a45-803f-0bf00312dc94"}}
{"id": "6cf6d43d7fe4d850", "prompt": "In `lib/response.js`, add an optional `encoding` parameter to the `res.send` method.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6cf6d43d7fe4d850", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:0faa0dee41e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43cecb99-be5b-45d5-bbf8-bcf11cb9cb3e"}}
{"id": "f760f90454e94d96", "prompt": "今回のリリースノート用のドラフトを書いて。最近の`body-parser`のセキュリティアップデート（CVE-2026-12590対応）と、`res.send`周りの修正を重点的に含めてほしい。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "ユーザーがすぐにアップデートすべき理由が伝わるように、セキュリティに関する記述を強調して。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f760f90454e94d96", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:4cef6fb80abd", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b2bf29e1-6e13-42f0-9182-91d50ffc6948"}}
{"id": "491c8b59faa03a06", "prompt": "where is the logic for res.cookie defined?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "491c8b59faa03a06", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:7d37ea83a468", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6bcc7f1d-f9f1-4cb1-a723-1af2c487fe6f"}}
{"id": "39657712877229ae", "prompt": "I'm seeing some inconsistencies in how we handle different view engines. Can you:\n- Check `lib/view.js` for any hardcoded logic that might interfere with custom engines.\n- Verify that `examples/ejs/index.js` and `examples/mvc/controllers/user/views/edit.hbs` are behaving as expected under high load.\n- Ensure `test/app.render.js` covers both EJS and Handlebars edge cases.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "39657712877229ae", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:b00735049e7a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bdc6ae13-0831-4456-8850-2b3e5eef09ab"}}
{"id": "c0af88b17f8b5121", "prompt": "History.mdに、新しいコミット履歴を追加する作業を手伝って。最近の`res.send`の修正と、`query`リクエストの条件付き再検証機能の追加を追加したい。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c0af88b17f8b5121", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:3bd3553e2639", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2435a516-57a1-4076-bf73-8a854f431e55"}}
{"id": "e9ba6e8ef4dcb9c7", "prompt": "¿Cómo funciona el flujo de enrutamiento en `lib/application.js`? Quiero entender cómo se registran los middleware.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9ba6e8ef4dcb9c7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:063e171415c6", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0226a59d-3e89-4168-8a02-30b2e3a1cf15"}}
{"id": "a3e844797d247f2f", "prompt": "Refactor the cookie handling logic. Currently, `res.cookie()` and `res.send()` (when setting headers) have separate implementations for serializing cookies. \n\nPlease unify this into a single `serializeCookie` function in `lib/utils.js` and update all call sites in `lib/response.js` to use it. I want to make sure `test/res.cookie.js` covers all the edge cases still.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `res.clearCookie()` can also be simplified using this new function."}, {"prompt": "Verify that the cookie parsing in `lib/request.js` isn't affected by this change."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a3e844797d247f2f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:554d88d6bf7a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4fb98ec5-0d42-4705-afba-77f4c57c212f"}}
{"id": "ae0c29ee64f08f02", "prompt": "Hallo,\n`req.hostname` gibt bei manchen Proxy-Konfigurationen falsche Werte zurück. Wenn der Header `X-Forwarded-Host` mehrere Hosts enthält, trennt der aktuelle Code sie nicht korrekt auf.\n\nIm `lib/request.js` steht:\n```javascript\nvar host = decode(req.get('X-Forwarded-Host') || '')\n```\n\nEs passiert ein Split auf Kommas, aber es wird kein Whitespace removed. Wenn der Loadbalancer `host1, host2` sendet (mit Leerzeichen), klappt das Mapping nicht mehr.\n\nKannst du das robustieren?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Kannst du kurz prüfen, ob `req.ips` das gleiche Problem hat? Die Logik sieht sehr ähnlich aus."}, {"prompt": "Danke, dann kannst du das Fix-Commit auf `lib/request.js` markieren."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ae0c29ee64f08f02", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:9fa458bf7d92", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f218f09b-da2e-4d30-afbf-3fe3dcdce867"}}
{"id": "5eb003df19aeb12b", "prompt": "Check test/app.js. How many times is `app.listen` mocked?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5eb003df19aeb12b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:6b69176e8e3b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d853b76-b958-4322-b80b-6f78f4987a9b"}}
{"id": "398bf781081002a8", "prompt": "We just bumped `body-parser` in `package.json` to fix CVE-2026-12590. I need you to audit `lib/utils.js` and `lib/request.js` to make sure we aren't passing untrusted objects into any legacy parsing logic that might bypass the new fixes. Specifically, look at how `req.query` is constructed and if there's any deep clone vulnerability.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "398bf781081002a8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:559ad308bd43", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9703c12-1541-47e8-b04c-72ea82c9669a"}}
{"id": "39e8cc9ddf2b556d", "prompt": "Why is `res.send()` not preserving the ETag when `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` is used? I saw commit `9a34acf` mentions this fix. Please explain the logic in `lib/response.js` that handles this condition.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "39e8cc9ddf2b556d", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:7b050bc3094a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb4c5b59-7c37-4599-a724-9907f09c8061"}}
{"id": "9e28859c4048ab8e", "prompt": "Add lodash to the devDependencies. We need it for some upcoming utility scripts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9e28859c4048ab8e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:172bff9cfbf0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d01eab0-5d46-4803-800d-326b23991e6c"}}
{"id": "1f1fd883723be77f", "prompt": "Hey, can you run the tests for me? I'm seeing some weird behavior in `res.send` when combined with `Transfer-Encoding` and I want to make sure the recent fix (commit 9a34acf) didn't break anything else. Also, please lint the code and fix any issues it reports.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1f1fd883723be77f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:50071349c67e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "543503de-19d1-4ad1-afe6-6ca12581c161"}}
{"id": "970ee42c073de650", "prompt": "fix a typo in the README.md file", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "970ee42c073de650", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:1b4bd2dfe6c3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "889823ff-07a7-4adc-a8f3-0314d50be68c"}}
{"id": "48144ddc31343571", "prompt": "Triage the following SAST findings:\n\n1. `examples/auth/views/login.ejs`: Medium severity - XSS risk in user input rendering.\n2. `lib/response.js`: Low severity - Use of `res.cookie` without explicit `httpOnly` flag.\n\nFor #1, please fix `examples/auth/views/login.ejs`. For #2, update `lib/response.js` to default to httpOnly unless explicitly overridden, but ensure this doesn't break the `examples/cookie-sessions/index.js` test suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "48144ddc31343571", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:080b86fa822d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f8404ab-325c-49f9-ba06-af3b592958a8"}}
{"id": "628c4ac958f99658", "prompt": "check if there are any node processes running in the background that might be conflicting with the test suite", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "628c4ac958f99658", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "express:8d913084b887", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "809c1f23-3a1d-40e8-b4e7-db69cb7b621b"}}
{"id": "c7f83707008131f8", "prompt": "I need to verify the new conditional revalidation support for QUERY requests added in #7366. Run the acceptance test for web-service or content-negotiation and make sure the ETag header is being generated correctly on GET requests with If-None-Match.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c7f83707008131f8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:552b67f99041", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a95cd382-a983-4300-924a-3ddbbf209a29"}}
{"id": "d442b65f0568d1f1", "prompt": "Hallo,\nwir haben ein Problem mit `express.urlencoded()` in Verbindung mit der `qs` Bibliothek. Seit dem Update auf `qs` 6.15.x (siehe Commit `a08da78`) werden spezielle Zeichen in Formulardaten nicht mehr wie erwartet parse.\n\nWenn ich `key[0]=a&key[1]=b` sende, bekomme ich `{ key: 'a' }` statt `{ key: ['a', 'b'] }`.\n\nDas passiert nur mit tief verschachtelten Arrays. Ist das ein bekanntes Issue im Body-Parser Wrapper oder in Express selbst?\n\nFehlerhafte Ausgabe:\n`{ key: 'a' }`\nErwartet:\n`{ key: [ 'a', 'b' ] }`\n\nBitte prüft den Aufruf von `qs.parse` in den Middleware-Optionen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d442b65f0568d1f1", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:ba0bac669795", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26bff6dd-8a52-49b8-951e-c1ea90358d6d"}}
{"id": "22e658c67b3235b7", "prompt": "Change the error message in `examples/error-pages/views/500.ejs` from 'Internal Server Error' to 'Something went wrong on our end'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22e658c67b3235b7", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:a28abdd0754f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e177485e-bd97-4289-9e3e-e32f2a57217e"}}
{"id": "7cda0d47bf6c498e", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of examples in the `examples` folder. Can you summarize the difference between the `cookie-sessions` and `cookies` examples? I want to know when I should use signed cookies versus session storage backed by a store like Redis (as seen in `examples/session/redis.js`).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7cda0d47bf6c498e", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:4009e9e0285d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd850aa7-919f-4567-a57f-e72ac1e02fc7"}}
{"id": "db024a7844ae7e85", "prompt": "Wait, I messed up the last commit. I accidentally included a console.log in `lib/request.js`. Can you amend the last commit to remove that line?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db024a7844ae7e85", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:e3710df0b30f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0525ce57-01ef-4f75-acce-34cea2169acb"}}
{"id": "f83153b96c0ce969", "prompt": "I need to understand the flow for setting cookies in the response object. Which files in lib/ handle the `res.cookie` implementation and where is the actual header modification done?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f83153b96c0ce969", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:a5c26c2cb0bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c9f0d43-ef0e-4948-8ff3-749496181e6e"}}
{"id": "ee67d2c664ff38ac", "prompt": "find all TODO comments in the lib/ folder and list them out for me. I want to see if there's any technical debt I should address before the next sprint.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are any of these tagged with 'high priority' or 'bug'?"}, {"prompt": "Can you summarize the main themes of these todos?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ee67d2c664ff38ac", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:920e0bee6c1c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb77def8-b5d1-4b7b-882b-e3490774bad7"}}
{"id": "fe29f8b504b63d5c", "prompt": "Which files handle the view rendering logic? I'm looking for the implementation of `res.render`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fe29f8b504b63d5c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:ea2716ad5acf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b6df4ea-eec0-41d2-a2de-707386451676"}}
{"id": "893b6e477a1775ab", "prompt": "Devo aggiornare la gestione delle intestazioni in `lib/response.js`. Sembra che `res.set()` non stia sovrascrivendo correttamente la `Cache-Control` se è già stata impostata in precedenza nello stesso ciclo di richiesta usando `res.set()` su chiavi diverse.\n\nEsempio:\n```javascript\napp.get('/', (req, res) => {\n  res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-cache');\n  // ... altro codice\n  res.set('X-Custom', 'value');\n  res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-store'); // Questo dovrebbe sovrascrivere, ma non lo fa?\n});\n```\n\nControllate dove viene gestito l'oggetto `res.headers` internamente. Forse state usando un oggetto che non si aggiorna come previsto?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "893b6e477a1775ab", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:13c85b60051c", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04594039-18a9-48c0-8513-4552a372f02e"}}
{"id": "6acd7081932b552a", "prompt": "We need to address security vulnerabilities. Run an audit and let me know if any of our current dependencies have high or critical CVEs that need immediate bumping.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6acd7081932b552a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:4468e8cbb138", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "786385d1-ef26-4ca7-9df2-e980f561b806"}}
{"id": "73eeb983f351f36f", "prompt": "He visto que hay muchos tests de aceptación. ¿Podrías explicarme qué cubre exactamente `test/acceptance/auth.js`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Cómo se inicializa el entorno de pruebas en `test/support/env.js`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "73eeb983f351f36f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:cb9e6b9709fd", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "07602009-bb87-4a71-b678-844102901b46"}}
{"id": "dde58fea47e32407", "prompt": "Compare commit 53d4a0d and 4fe723d", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dde58fea47e32407", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:1c408cc7a3ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f2d1a36b-323a-424f-a707-dcd28d4d74de"}}
{"id": "7235ef0deeb43e5f", "prompt": "I've been working on some refactoring in lib/request.js and lib/response.js. Can you look at my uncommitted changes and split them into two logical commits? Make sure the commit messages follow conventional commits format.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7235ef0deeb43e5f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:833e34a72133", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebeae511-5625-424d-9733-54cfe145413a"}}
{"id": "8cad9f6458ae0452", "prompt": "I'm getting an error where `res.sendFile` isn't sending the correct ETag. Where is the hash calculation for files located? Check `lib/response.js` and `lib/utils.js`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a config option to disable ETag generation?"}, {"prompt": "How does the caching mechanism work in the static file middleware?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8cad9f6458ae0452", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:2ba50b0c2c5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "efe207ad-817e-466b-beea-c16e1f2c24dd"}}
{"id": "960d018dc74d6d7c", "prompt": "現在のライブラリの構造を理解しやすくするために、`lib/`ディレクトリ内の主要なコンポーネント（application, request, response, viewなど）の関係性を示すMermaid形式のアーキテクチャ図をREADMEに作成して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "`lib/request.js`と`lib/response.js`がどのように相互作用しているかも図に含めて。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "960d018dc74d6d7c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:ffffd82e7be3", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7e399f7-fdfa-44ea-8317-c851f50aface"}}
{"id": "ebdf75f7facd124f", "prompt": "Hey, I need to know why `res.send` isn't setting Content-Length when Transfer-Encoding is chunked. The commit 18e5ec9 claims to fix this but I'm seeing leaks in staging. Run the `res.send` tests and tell me if they pass.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ebdf75f7facd124f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:3b1e0a740c8c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1952ba8a-b963-4571-9f7c-5f871dc1fd0b"}}
{"id": "1a7bc8d6100917d8", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand why `req.acceptsLanguages()` is returning unexpected results in `test/req.acceptsLanguages.js`. I suspect it's related to how we parse the `Accept-Language` header. Can you look up the MDN documentation for `Accept-Language`? Specifically, how should quality values (`q=0.9`) be parsed when there are multiple languages with the same quality? I think our current implementation in `lib/request.js` might be sorting incorrectly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1a7bc8d6100917d8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:112a0bec3164", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "82277aea-e331-44da-ad47-f3697ca18dc7"}}
{"id": "f888142640bdeb33", "prompt": "Hi, ich bekomme beim Aufruf von `res.download()` einen Fehler, wenn ich einen Dateinamen mit chinesischen Zeichen verwende. Der Pfad zu den Dateien ist `examples/downloads/files/`. Hier ist der Stacktrace:\n\n```\nError: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat '/path/to/examples/downloads/files/CCTV%E6%91%84%E5%83%8F%E5%A4%B4%E8%A7%86%E9%A2%91%E5%A4%87%E4%BB%BD.mp4'\n```\n\nEs scheint, als würde der Code den Filename nicht korrekt encodieren oder decodieren, bevor er ihn an das Dateisystem übergibt. Kannst du das in `lib/response.js` fixen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f888142640bdeb33", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:04918abf79bb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6676268-6cf4-4f54-904c-65cdd44429fe"}}
{"id": "bc0fde6a4e78d7eb", "prompt": "Please fix the linting errors in lib/express.js and lib/application.js. The CI is failing and I need this unblocked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc0fde6a4e78d7eb", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:07442ff77f7d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbf04fa5-d735-403d-940d-82cd1e2bf330"}}
{"id": "9c3ee0b489f0ed1b", "prompt": "Hi there,\n\nI'm debugging a production issue where `req.get('Accept')` might be returning cached values or stale data in certain edge cases involving `Transfer-Encoding: chunked`.\n\nCould you fetch the source code for `lib/response.js` from the latest release of Express (v4.18.2 or whatever the stable version is currently) using a direct raw GitHub URL? I need to compare it against our local `lib/response.js` to see if the chunked encoding fix from commit `9a34acf` was actually merged into the published npm package or if we need to wait for the next patch. \n\nAlso, can you ping the Express maintainers' status page or Twitter to see if there are any known outages affecting the docs or repository right now? Just trying to rule out environment issues.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9c3ee0b489f0ed1b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "express:e7f2d3df85fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0e214c23-d08d-46ab-b9f0-42d6c35a0b07"}}
{"id": "050fe32d89a3e5f0", "prompt": "I need to bump the version in package.json for the next release. It's currently 4.19.x, let's bump it to 4.19.2. Don't commit yet, just show me the diff.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "050fe32d89a3e5f0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:e70f56227e48", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5dd1aee-b715-4ffd-b276-a7dbbab29625"}}
{"id": "0bda2bc3382671ee", "prompt": "I've been messing around with the error handling in `examples/error-pages/index.js` but it's a mess. Can you stash my current changes so I have a clean working directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0bda2bc3382671ee", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:7cd33a2f658d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50898e68-1e4b-412b-8975-ba3d541c30f8"}}
{"id": "0593358e38ac64aa", "prompt": "I ran a scan on the `lib/` directory and found a potential path traversal issue in `lib/response.js` when handling the `download` method. The `path.resolve` call seems to rely on `res.download` arguments without sufficient sanitization against `../` sequences. Please review `lib/response.js` lines around the file serving logic and the `examples/downloads/index.js` usage to ensure the path is strictly scoped under the intended directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0593358e38ac64aa", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:d60f732818f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a9754db-3d98-41fa-8b37-cd64cf71a95d"}}
{"id": "e3af804532c5055d", "prompt": "I just merged a PR that bumps `body-parser` to ^2.3.0 (see commit ba06733). I'm worried about the CVE-2026-12590 fix not being fully integrated with our current route handling. Can you check if `lib/request.js` or `lib/response.js` needs updates to handle the new bodyParser types correctly? Run the acceptance tests for 'web-service' to verify.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e3af804532c5055d", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:5529c550d6cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8707750a-1e6d-4fc3-a11b-a089190a2801"}}
{"id": "77c8c80d7ed077dd", "prompt": "Mi serve far partire l'applicazione hello-world per un debug manuale. Avvia l'server in background sulla porta 3000 e aspetta che sia pronto. Quando è attivo, fammi un fischio.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "77c8c80d7ed077dd", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:b678d0daf128", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7456f811-7656-4877-951a-e2202b0e24c2"}}
{"id": "7baa001889f99c34", "prompt": "Can you list all the branches in this repo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7baa001889f99c34", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:ccf4172100d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "605abe45-ac44-42f0-8cea-839a2cbab7be"}}
{"id": "206e74013a85b59f", "prompt": "We need to benchmark the new middleware setup in lib/express.js. Can you write a simple script that hits the root route 1000 times with 10 concurrent connections and report the avg latency? Use the existing static files example for the load test.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "206e74013a85b59f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "express:34ca035f9eb0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cba622d-3b81-47c1-96df-d8b36c04bdcf"}}
{"id": "92fcef72d5237639", "prompt": "開発者向けドキュメントとして、`lib/application.js`の初期化フローについての解説セクションを新しく作成して。どの順番で設定が読み込まれるのかを詳しく書きたい。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "`lib/boot.js`との関係性についても触れて。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "92fcef72d5237639", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:f9106fd68aa9", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8361a5a9-399a-48e6-a3bb-da14104fa14b"}}
{"id": "21d44cff0bf5e393", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of something in examples/mvc/index.js and I need to pull the latest changes from main immediately. Stash my current work so the working directory is clean.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "21d44cff0bf5e393", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:b0c019a55f4a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6dbadd4-535c-4d8f-ac7f-6739e8d40234"}}
{"id": "df509d7dcd0cfd61", "prompt": "Show me the commit 9a34acf details.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df509d7dcd0cfd61", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:d1021d5a3bf9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "363b1e8b-2c21-4509-812a-6a7676c60358"}}
{"id": "5cea40b7172dd3ad", "prompt": "Create a new branch called 'feature/view-engine-update' and switch to it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5cea40b7172dd3ad", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:3ac381777e65", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9512840-a68d-4dd6-9524-f079e1ca0c89"}}
{"id": "fcb7c6cabc0fb395", "prompt": "Add .env to .gitignore if it's not already there. I accidentally committed a local env file.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you add it? Show me the .gitignore contents."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fcb7c6cabc0fb395", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:f05f61106d91", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "754406b6-5a88-4c7e-bcf8-394b498844fc"}}
{"id": "0f4aacbaf545ebf0", "prompt": "Hey, in der letzten Version gibt es ein Problem mit `res.send` und `Transfer-Encoding`. Commits wie `9a34acf` haben es zwar probiert zu fixen, aber bei großen Responses wird sometimes der Content-Length Header doppelt gesetzt, wenn ich manuell `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` vorgebe.\n\nHier die relevante Stelle in `lib/response.js`:\n```javascript\nif (hasBody && contentLength === null && !charset) {\n  contentLength = Buffer.byteLength(body)\n  this.set('Content-Length', contentLength)\n}\n```\n\nSobald ich `transfer-encoding` setze, wird trotzdem content-length geschrieben. Ich erwarte, dass bei chunked encoding kein Content-Length gesetzt wird. Bitte sieh dir das genauer an.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0f4aacbaf545ebf0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:7d0e986fb100", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb7d5741-55d2-47cc-b127-f536684b46e9"}}
{"id": "1122bcc37cc8735c", "prompt": "Can you point me to where the JSON body parser middleware is actually invoked in the default application setup? I'm trying to trace why some endpoints aren't getting parsed bodies.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1122bcc37cc8735c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:158e26aef699", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ece34fcc-47b3-40ee-9e7a-1676d910adf4"}}
{"id": "b19ec066a3b9e6cd", "prompt": "Check package.json and see if we can bump hbs to the latest version. If so, let me know what the current version is and what the potential breaking changes might be according to the changelog.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b19ec066a3b9e6cd", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:40ee903370cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe8830d2-14fb-438e-918d-87f020b63fc3"}}
{"id": "20839980eaa925df", "prompt": "README.mdに、新しい`res.send`の修正（Transfer-Encoding時のETag生成維持）についての説明を追加しておいて。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "20839980eaa925df", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "express:aa98ae8f77e6", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "58e8d797-54da-475c-8f10-b637f50edc91"}}
{"id": "c5a325557b399ec8", "prompt": "Check the `body-parser` repository issues or docs. We just bumped `body-parser` to ^2.3.0 to fix CVE-2026-12590. I have no idea what that CVE actually means. Is it a DoS vector? A prototype pollution? Can you give me a summary of the vulnerability so I can explain it to the team during standup?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c5a325557b399ec8", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:a18afa7c8312", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc4df6a1-5f30-4752-9e64-b07c53e763f4"}}
{"id": "31bb786d309ec6df", "prompt": "What changed in the codebase between commit 9a34acf and 3ce6d0e?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "31bb786d309ec6df", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "express:d28fcf56326a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ec46ee8-f14e-4e12-a843-4e91914e4c7e"}}
{"id": "610bbd93523956af", "prompt": "In `lib/response.js`, add a check to `res.status` so it returns `this` if the status is already set, to allow for cleaner chaining. After that, create a new branch called `feat/status-chaining` and commit the change.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now commit the change with a descriptive message following conventional commits style."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "610bbd93523956af", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:b1ea5d48bbbb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b95680ba-cb8f-476e-a1a3-1fa693744cb0"}}
{"id": "1b68bee7a59b0a8a", "prompt": "In the context of security, how does Express handle CSRF protection? I see body-parser and cookie-parser being used in examples, but where would I plug in a CSRF middleware? Is there a built-in one?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b68bee7a59b0a8a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:cb3048d2ad47", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59619f4a-cd57-4cb2-b4b1-139c9bd074bd"}}
{"id": "e194bbbccae9d3ed", "prompt": "Refactor the following to improve maintainability:\n- Move the logic in `examples/multi-router/controllers/` into a more structured directory if it makes sense.\n- Consolidate the utility functions in `lib/utils.js` that are currently being duplicated in `test/support/utils.js`.\n- Standardize the error handling pattern across `examples/error-pages/` and `examples/error/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e194bbbccae9d3ed", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:717c4b60b871", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "486ea89d-32f0-4f09-a6ca-51c0b4a091ee"}}
{"id": "3bbfc02298065a2c", "prompt": "The documentation in `Readme.md` is a bit outdated regarding the middleware signature. Can you check `lib/express.js` and update the Readme accordingly?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3bbfc02298065a2c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:cea25e643051", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "79a0e61d-7d12-4c06-a144-441cbdcd81b5"}}
{"id": "040edb7e1018b4da", "prompt": "We're seeing a security advisory regarding `qs` parsing. We bumped the minimum version in `package.json`, but I need you to verify that `lib/request.js` doesn't have any custom query string parsing logic that bypasses the `qs` library. Check `req.query` definition in `lib/request.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "040edb7e1018b4da", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:a7af8ef5352c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2c654fb-c15a-4617-ba16-71819f547d4b"}}
{"id": "5899842eb8d887c3", "prompt": "In lib/response.js, the `res.send()` method has some messy handling for `Transfer-Encoding` vs `Content-Length`. Specifically, look at commit 9a34acf which fixes ETag generation when `Transfer-Encoding` is present.\n\nI need to refactor the logic in `res.send` and `res.sendFile` to ensure we aren't doubling up on headers or sending conflicting info. \n\n1. Extract the header-setting logic into a private helper `_getHeaders()` in `lib/utils.js`.\n2. Update `lib/response.js:send()` to use this helper.\n3. Update `lib/response.js:sendFile()` to use this helper.\n4. Ensure `test/res.send.js` and `test/res.sendFile.js` still pass.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The tests are failing in `test/res.sendFile.js` with `AssertionError: expected 0 to equal 100`. Check why the Content-Length is missing."}, {"prompt": "Great. Please update the JSDoc comments for the new `_getHeaders` function."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5899842eb8d887c3", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:5e9a5235d2c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7104693d-53f6-4c0b-be32-211d5fadedf7"}}
{"id": "62a86cd834eb898c", "prompt": "Readme.md is getting huge. Can you refactor the 'Route Parameters' section to only show the most common examples? Remove the older, obscure ones involving custom separators.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "62a86cd834eb898c", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "express:8eea9a5d919d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6aa3364-6a26-4516-aa24-aefb139212b2"}}
{"id": "5c4ec0bc5b19585f", "prompt": "Mira `lib/view.js`. ¿Cómo se gestiona la renderización de las plantillas y la integración con motores como EJS?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Cómo se pasan los `locals` desde el objeto de respuesta hacia la función de renderizado?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5c4ec0bc5b19585f", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "express:771dcf61d01e", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc58b785-5ae7-4baa-9a1e-f5d40da33029"}}
{"id": "04eed0240c93332b", "prompt": "I'm refactoring the middleware stack initialization in lib/application.js. Currently, we have a lot of repetitive `if (typeof fn !== 'function')` checks scattered throughout `app.use()` and `app.route()`. \n\nPlease extract this validation into a utility function and use it consistently. I want to see the logic centralized so we can easily add logging or metrics later. Make sure `test/app.use.js` still passes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "04eed0240c93332b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "express:238b99bf5de6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f593fad3-29c7-4715-b08e-66da0c19d83c"}}
{"id": "e25f1e69798f3282", "prompt": "Search for all TODO comments in the codebase. I want to see a list of them with file paths and line numbers so I can plan some tech debt cleanup.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e25f1e69798f3282", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "express:02d8f97ad3ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aea12608-996d-43ae-9a70-86c407e878ed"}}
{"id": "87aa88ad1a8777e5", "prompt": "Salve, sto usando l'esempio `examples/downloads/index.js` e mi sono accorto che i caratteri non ASCII nei nomi dei file scaricati vengono codificati male nel header `Content-Disposition`.\n\nIn `lib/utils.js`, guardate la funzione `contentDisposition`. Sembra che non gestisca correttamente l'encoding RFC 5987 per nomi di file italiani con accenti.\n\nFammi una verifica rapida e aggiustala se necessario.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "87aa88ad1a8777e5", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "express:d925c5b97583", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "72d4392b-5942-43eb-9720-605425abbed7"}}
{"id": "03de05d6e1c17e89", "prompt": "Scan the `examples/` directory for any hardcoded secrets, API keys, or database credentials. I see `examples/session/redis.js` and `examples/content-negotiation/db.js` might have connection strings. If you find any, replace them with environment variable lookups or `.env` examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "03de05d6e1c17e89", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "express:76cfb468b6af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74ae52ab-f208-4a72-ab5b-41e387d24433"}}
{"id": "f20ee3be3c4d7886", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` option to the `res.sendFile` function in `lib/response.js`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "I'll need to see a test case for this in `test/res.sendFile.js` once you're done."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f20ee3be3c4d7886", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "express:6a2e19f14db5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d8afcba-9bcf-44ef-bb82-13dadc606778"}}
{"id": "4539e7b27431f26a", "prompt": "In `lib/request.js`, there are methods like `req.accepts()`, `req.acceptsCharsets()`, and `req.acceptsEncodings()`. How does Express parse the `Accept-*` headers from the HTTP request to populate these values? Is it just a simple string split or does it involve more complex negotiation logic?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you check `lib/utils.js` to see if there's a shared utility for parsing these headers that is also used in `lib/response.js` for `res.format()`?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any tests in `test/req.accepts.js` that specifically test for quality values (q=0.5) in the Accept header?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4539e7b27431f26a", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:333e3246cf13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0ea5ae4-e7ef-4dbc-9cb9-d19555ad45a0"}}
{"id": "e7c8d00a78be5bdb", "prompt": "where are the error handlers for 404 and 500 defined in the examples? look at examples/error-pages/", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e7c8d00a78be5bdb", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:33d751be548e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "617c62d7-8e69-46b0-a545-b359f290efb3"}}
{"id": "6fae2744e88632c9", "prompt": "Upgrade morgan to 1.12.0 as seen in the recent commits, and verify it doesn't break the logging behavior in any of the examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6fae2744e88632c9", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "express:d1d3d6430185", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a51cebe4-98a1-4c93-b12a-c368cf52e6ac"}}
{"id": "6465a6963bff1e2b", "prompt": "Revert the last commit `9a34acf`. It seems the fix for `res.send` is causing issues with the ETag generation in our staging environment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6465a6963bff1e2b", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "express:e0a9e430dc7a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bd84510-8b2a-42c6-8f81-dbb8c2b1abde"}}
{"id": "a443b8c901e72b56", "prompt": "I'm getting a 404 on my custom error handler. Trace where the default 404 response is generated in lib/response.js. Is it in `res.render` or a catch-all middleware?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, show me the specific lines in lib/response.js that handle the 404 status."}, {"prompt": "Check lib/application.js to see what the default error handling middleware looks like."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a443b8c901e72b56", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:ab8285e7269b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c444413-13db-4fd2-8944-c9cda18c2685"}}
{"id": "e4156cb975700534", "prompt": "The current test coverage for `lib/request.js` is too low. Please:\n- Add unit tests for all `req.*` methods found in `test/req.*.js`.\n- Ensure `test/support/env.js` provides a clean state for each test run.\n- Check if `lib/request.js` correctly handles the subdomains logic mentioned in `test/req.subdomains.js`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e4156cb975700534", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:41479e1f6d16", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d0f76a0d-64e2-454b-9890-1e8ee3cb980b"}}
{"id": "d93aa6160f9bc265", "prompt": "We're seeing some issues with `req.signedCookies` in test/req.signedCookies.js. I want to verify the expected behavior against the `cookie-signature` documentation. Specifically, does `signed-cs` automatically use timestamp validation by default? The docs seem vague on whether we need to pass an extra config object to enable it, or if we should be doing it manually in lib/request.js.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d93aa6160f9bc265", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:7728d14195ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d86604ad-2940-4e7c-9344-123c812c0bde"}}
{"id": "d320d616288ed125", "prompt": "System health check needed: \n1. Check `package.json` for any outdated dependencies that have known CVEs (look closely at `body-parser` and `qs`). \n2. Inspect `lib/application.js` for memory leaks during route registration. \n3. Verify that `test/regression.js` passes with the current environment configuration.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d320d616288ed125", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "express:54fdbba36eac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e50e0cab-0b0d-40f6-8eb5-5d03e60153b8"}}
{"id": "fc25561e0c0d10b3", "prompt": "I'm using the MVC pattern from examples/mvc. In that example, controllers are separated by resource (e.g., controllers/pet, controllers/user). Is this the recommended way to structure a large Express app, or is there a better pattern for splitting routes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fc25561e0c0d10b3", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:8f0ae3c5974c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8adbcae8-7134-4aa2-b07e-d29c2e2c25d6"}}
{"id": "c0ae2bcbc3fab9bf", "prompt": "We are using `qs` for parsing query strings, currently minimum 6.15.2. I keep seeing weird behavior with nested objects in `req.query`. Can you check the `qs` GitHub repository for the latest release notes? Specifically, I want to know if there's a new option to disable array parsing or limit depth, as suggested in their recent docs. I want to prevent potential prototype pollution attacks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c0ae2bcbc3fab9bf", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "express:b1669df1b343", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b221628-9660-4799-ab95-139aea26abd9"}}
{"id": "5ee33e22469a3bd0", "prompt": "Looking at the recent commit history, there's a fix for res.send regarding ETag generation with Transfer-Encoding. Can you explain why Transfer-Encoding changes how ETags are generated or validated in HTTP responses?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this fix apply to all content types or just specific ones?"}, {"prompt": "What is the impact on cache headers?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5ee33e22469a3bd0", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "express:7dda2cead6b8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6458cf32-44ad-4794-8499-9f0fd163c067"}}
{"id": "6239c2a51dcb2071", "prompt": "Where is the Content-Length header logic implemented? I saw a recent commit fixing it with Transfer-Encoding. I want to see the code before and after to understand the race condition or state issue.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6239c2a51dcb2071", "repo": "express", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "express:bccba69f856f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "express-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d6dd8b9-c5ab-4865-8557-9729f3ada956"}}
{"id": "1be7943a3b9118ba", "prompt": "Triage this CI failure. It looks like a security-related integration test is failing on Windows. \n\n```shell\nError: test_exec_with_separator ... FAILED\nCaused by:\n  process didn't exit successfully: ... ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED\n```\n\nCheck scripts/create-archive.sh and the Windows-specific handling in src/exec. Is this a bug in my code or a permissions issue in the test environment? I need a fix if it's code-related.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1be7943a3b9118ba", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:18cd7ade11c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "837cafe3-6ce6-496b-9df5-f642ac4b2153"}}
{"id": "84a5f1a3dfcc1d5b", "prompt": "Check git blame on src/cli.rs around the part where pattern arguments are handled. I want to see the history of how mandatory patterns were implemented.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "84a5f1a3dfcc1d5b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:7d5f306b0904", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b1d9f02-7e94-459d-a49b-897d2a39aa79"}}
{"id": "b77d73bb15f4a2cd", "prompt": "Hey, j'ai un doute sur le comportement de `fdfind` sous Linux. Le fichier `contrib/completion/fdfind.bash` semble suggérer des alias. Est-ce que la page d'accueil du projet (github.com/sharkdp/fd) a changé récemment pour mentionner `fdfind` comme binaire principal par défaut ? Je cherche juste à confirmer ce que le grand public voit actuellement, car mes docs locales sont peut-être obsolètes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Parfait, merci. Du coup, est-ce que le fichier `doc/fd.1` est toujours le manpage de référence ou si c'est `fdfind.1` maintenant ?"}, {"prompt": "Non attends, n'y touche pas. Merci quand même."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b77d73bb15f4a2cd", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:b36197c7c725", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0aed705-27a5-439d-abb3-b84885a02f91"}}
{"id": "387a119226af5c22", "prompt": "I'm worried about information leakage in the error messages. Check src/error.rs and src/output.rs to see if any absolute paths or internal state are printed to stdout/stderr in a way that could leak user directory structure to an attacker or log aggregator. This is for a security audit report.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "387a119226af5c22", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:4c3c9b192d2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d49d7347-1849-492c-95b6-f7edbc87f0c2"}}
{"id": "774e30347a35c63a", "prompt": "Nei filtri, dove viene implementato il controllo delle dimensioni del file? Dammi il path completo del modulo e la funzione chiave.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "774e30347a35c63a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:8d29113bed5a", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d978352-d5a4-4a25-904e-ff3dbd5f7026"}}
{"id": "475982cf5af4c65f", "prompt": "Bonjour, peux-tu vérifier que le projet compile bien en release et exécuter les tests unitaires ? Si tout passe, lance le formateur du code (`cargo fmt`) et clippy avec les warnings comme erreurs pour corriger automatiquement ce qui est possible. J'ai besoin d'un état des lieux propre avant de push.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "475982cf5af4c65f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:ce04f16bc743", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2a2e2b9-e8ed-4416-83e0-9b48f83d9e3c"}}
{"id": "fb72bfbdb5ccb429", "prompt": "I'm looking to clean up some technical debt before the next release. Can you handle the following:\n1. Audit `src/sanitize.rs` and `src/regex_helper.rs` to see if we can unify any of the string processing logic.\n2. The error reporting in `src/error.rs` feels a bit inconsistent with the recent changes in `src/exec/job.rs`; make sure error messages aren't being over-sanitized.\n3. Check `tests/tests.rs` and see if we can add more coverage for the edge cases mentioned in the recent symlink fixes in `src/walk.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb72bfbdb5ccb429", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "fd:ef76daa870bb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a4a4fa33-a21a-42fa-9f56-753b465747f1"}}
{"id": "a131c4d980ad55f9", "prompt": "No `src/config.rs`, adicione um novo campo opcional na estrutura de configuração chamado `max_depth_limit` do tipo `Option<u32>`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a131c4d980ad55f9", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:45bf3f3bac1a", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ead2c3f8-827c-4414-9ccb-97c8eb901231"}}
{"id": "0ef6e463abfb1639", "prompt": "A mensagem de erro que aparece quando um padrão não é fornecido está muito vaga. Pode ajustar o erro no `src/cli.rs` para algo mais amigável, como 'Erro: é necessário fornecer um padrão de busca'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ef6e463abfb1639", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:bbbb5e9aa39e", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f12cb7b0-770d-41c2-a5ee-708d877a0707"}}
{"id": "850b6e7e6cb10719", "prompt": "The `src/fmt/` module is getting hard to read. Can you rename the internal types in `src/fmt/input.rs` and `src/fmt/mod.rs` to be more consistent with the rest of the codebase (e.g., using `PascalCase` for structs)? Also, please move the `print_output` function from `src/output.rs` into this module if it belongs there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "850b6e7e6cb10719", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:87f14f15ac93", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0180f0c-6924-42d0-b124-a12e63ffde06"}}
{"id": "4c66bd60a5758a2d", "prompt": "The documentation for the `--exec` flag in the README is a bit thin. Can you expand the 'Command Execution' section to explain how parallel jobs are handled, referencing the logic in src/exec/job.rs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4c66bd60a5758a2d", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:32ef5d6b7ac2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d4bddc2-2979-4b80-86a7-1dfd128f6d40"}}
{"id": "75048f95c92c228a", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/filter/mod.rs`. How are the different filter types (size, time, owner) being applied to the entries during the walk?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "75048f95c92c228a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:ed8ec3348846", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ace56ef-f023-4c12-90a2-9722ae39211e"}}
{"id": "44f7943eedc8bd67", "prompt": "Update CHANGELOG.md to include a new section for version 10.5.1. Mention that we've improved the regex handling in src/regex_helper.rs and fixed a minor bug in src/sanitize.rs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "44f7943eedc8bd67", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:8a9013c15514", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "90c4d1c0-13ee-4bb3-bc91-0f597fb24b99"}}
{"id": "fa9cb84657ae6277", "prompt": "Remova o arquivo `doc/screencast.sh` que não está mais sendo utilizado no repositório.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fa9cb84657ae6277", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:87686b8ea761", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53121389-0bf5-4a88-82df-083b502c84a0"}}
{"id": "a023e0ad5b546e20", "prompt": "Can you add a new field to the `Config` struct in `src/config.rs` to support a `--max-depth` flag, and then wire it up in `src/cli.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a023e0ad5b546e20", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:847b28d9c5d0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86c7e0b5-28a9-4220-adff-5c2f080327ed"}}
{"id": "d6633eb2df2b575e", "prompt": "I need a high-level architecture diagram for this project. Can you describe how the directory traversal in src/walk.rs interacts with the filtering logic in src/filter/mod.rs and finally outputs results via src/output.rs? Use Mermaid syntax.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d6633eb2df2b575e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:8a47efc784ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee1db0da-932b-48da-ba2d-b4b45c1ceb9e"}}
{"id": "adb718b902373f2e", "prompt": "The documentation in `doc/release-checklist.md` is outdated. Can you check `scripts/version-bump.sh` and see if we need to update any steps in the checklist?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "adb718b902373f2e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:3a65c392b747", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd892680-3943-4624-b886-77a97e3caeee"}}
{"id": "85cf8c4a74044b26", "prompt": "Trova dove viene usata la regex helper `compile_regex`. Devo aggiornare il comportamento del pattern matching.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "85cf8c4a74044b26", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:263a135ef126", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4fe5fbd6-9449-41e4-9ec9-3314db5cd544"}}
{"id": "2b4dc8f4a82828ad", "prompt": "Find the code that handles the `--min-depth` and `--max-depth` filters. I want to make sure the pruning logic in `src/walk.rs` respects these constraints correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2b4dc8f4a82828ad", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:e922b20b708b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c900208c-40ee-45b5-aa67-c857b5c175df"}}
{"id": "6fa297988fdf0d63", "prompt": "Explain the logic in `src/sanitize.rs`. What exactly are we trying to sanitize and why?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6fa297988fdf0d63", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:4cf15510461e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "710e078c-392e-499f-866c-231a3b65f24f"}}
{"id": "26694ff6d5d34a44", "prompt": "I want to use `fd` in a CI pipeline. Are there any flags that make the output more suitable for scripting, instead of the colorful, interactive output?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "26694ff6d5d34a44", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:203262946bb1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66e731d0-258c-44b3-a93c-f81e804e3cdd"}}
{"id": "b58896ca2b70e960", "prompt": "Where is the logic for the \"smart case\" search mode implemented? I need to see how it determines whether to use case-sensitive or case-insensitive matching based on the pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b58896ca2b70e960", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:d53c7444e130", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e31b2e7-beb6-4916-8d59-bba61db07431"}}
{"id": "8b9b48b4d27193bb", "prompt": "I need to see the diff between the current HEAD and the commit 5bbfa3e. Just give me a high-level summary of the docs changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b9b48b4d27193bb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:3f0f68837cf3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "795391a5-5734-40ca-a29c-292f3d63475d"}}
{"id": "cc5091c873b970f8", "prompt": "I need to add a new filter. Where should I look in `src/filter/` to see how `size.rs` or `time.rs` are implemented to ensure I follow the right pattern?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a specific trait in `src/filter/mod.rs` I need to implement?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cc5091c873b970f8", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:4265d86d7eec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a996ef93-92cc-4917-8b06-b0686f0a8285"}}
{"id": "e1b0431cdaacfb4b", "prompt": "I need to add a new command flag. Where in src/cli.rs is the argument parsing defined, and which struct should I be modifying to include a new option?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e1b0431cdaacfb4b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:cbf4c2bdbffd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2a27e4d2-e40e-4da0-89a9-13a44558c4dc"}}
{"id": "9b09ffab4d06c84a", "prompt": "The error handling in `src/exec/command.rs` is a bit too verbose when a job fails. Make the error output more concise, similar to how we handle errors in `src/main.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b09ffab4d06c84a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:4d322a27633a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00d73e2e-c7b8-417a-bb1c-f86b06e305a5"}}
{"id": "d67fef780002bb14", "prompt": "Run a cargo audit and report any security vulnerabilities found in the current dependency tree.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d67fef780002bb14", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:2d419b0aa9cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dc5d49c8-3910-4bd3-a30b-020e5a01c3b5"}}
{"id": "ce8d96ef52b6062a", "prompt": "Pode renomear a função `sanitize` no arquivo `src/sanitize.rs` para `clean_input`? Se sim, atualize todas as chamadas em outros arquivos do projeto para manter a consistência.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Certifique-se de que o `src/main.rs` também foi atualizado."}, {"prompt": "Verifique se o compilador aponta algum erro após a renomeação."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ce8d96ef52b6062a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:9288a61d47fc", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37f47746-601b-40cd-8216-ce020195a878"}}
{"id": "31eb9ba4afdb638c", "prompt": "In src/config.rs, we use the `ignore` crate to handle .gitignore files. Can you check the official `ignore` crate documentation to see if there is a specific API flag to treat .gitignore as a glob pattern rather than an extended regex? I want to ensure we are using the default correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "31eb9ba4afdb638c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:27897e304b8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6cc52ac5-7336-4f51-88fe-32e297863111"}}
{"id": "8b810aa1651a1eec", "prompt": "Looking at `src/dir_entry.rs`. How is the distinction between a regular file, a directory, and a symlink handled in the `DirEntry` type?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b810aa1651a1eec", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:a7964b6d9766", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6eb9d122-f1c5-4fdd-af07-2bfa47f7f7cc"}}
{"id": "751c4d0bbeb92c7b", "prompt": "Looking at src/filter/time.rs, we parse time arguments using chrono. I read somewhere that chrono deprecated some of the string parsing methods in v0.4. Please check the latest chrono documentation for the recommended way to parse custom time formats from command line arguments without triggering deprecation warnings or future breaking changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "751c4d0bbeb92c7b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:be0121f588c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f998c818-7d20-43cc-8e83-fe14bf03ae0d"}}
{"id": "8a2b8b77b4955b2c", "prompt": "Add a new error variant to `src/error.rs` called `InvalidPattern` and make sure it's used if the regex pattern fails to compile in `src/main.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8a2b8b77b4955b2c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:c64ec10de80f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4420f10a-d7a6-4ac5-b086-7dd4641538ed"}}
{"id": "e91669b7fce13918", "prompt": "Fix the build error related to `exit_codes`. I just added a new error type `Error::PermissionDenied` but the compiler is complaining that it's not matched in the `exit_code()` method. Find the exhaustiveness check and add the missing arm.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e91669b7fce13918", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:6df2c77ed48d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "156837b5-f094-4a79-8c0e-736ba5b31de2"}}
{"id": "bc3e5241132384fd", "prompt": "We are seeing some deprecation warnings in CI related to `clap`. I know we bumped clap in `Cargo.lock` recently. Could you look up the changelog or migration guide for `clap` between the version we are using now (based on Cargo.lock) and the one before? Specifically, I need to know if `App::new()` is still the recommended way to build the CLI or if we need to refactor to the builder pattern in `src/cli.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc3e5241132384fd", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:3a34776673c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3d1b88b-61c9-41db-8b1e-6b05f13cc6b9"}}
{"id": "2c4b9abd58b6edb5", "prompt": "The build script uses Cross.toml. Can you look up the official Cross documentation for the latest supported Rust image tags? I want to update our Dockerfile reference in a comment, but first I need the exact tag string for `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` support in the latest Cross release.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2c4b9abd58b6edb5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:2c9eee9fcf5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca0bf8a5-6cb5-4b3f-ab17-c545cbd4ab32"}}
{"id": "ba02ff68006d8b95", "prompt": "I just updated fd to the latest version from git and now `fd --size +10M` throws a parse error:\n\n```\nthread 'main' panicked at src/filter/size.rs:42:22:\nindex out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0\nnote: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a full backtrace\n```\n\nIt seems like the size filter logic assumes the regex match will always capture a group, but if I pass just a number without a unit, it fails. Can you fix `src/filter/size.rs` to handle bare integers correctly?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also add a test case for this in `tests/tests.rs`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba02ff68006d8b95", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:b6bb92e886fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f1b0afb-1ceb-450f-9e57-5cdab5c5b63e"}}
{"id": "371d3147dea65654", "prompt": "Run a cargo audit scan on this repo. I need to know if any of the dependencies (especially `regex`, `aho-corasick`, and `ignore`) have known CVEs that could lead to DoS or code execution. Paste the full output of the scan.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "List the top 3 critical vulnerabilities found."}, {"prompt": "Which specific dependency versions need updates?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "371d3147dea65654", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:bea15e995e94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6c556c9-1fc2-45b0-9e2c-04c0ed22d2ad"}}
{"id": "cfb9030ace067646", "prompt": "The error message when a directory is not found is a bit cryptic. Can you update `src/error.rs` to provide a more user-friendly message for missing paths?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cfb9030ace067646", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:9cc79d8f6575", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d226f565-705a-4e01-9049-97e32a87bed6"}}
{"id": "bc196caeac83d135", "prompt": "Generate the man page. I ran `scripts/update-help.awk` but I think the output in `doc/fd.1` is stale. Can you verify if the current CLI help matches the man page content?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc196caeac83d135", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:525156395ba5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "60fa2400-5b2c-4f75-ab60-32e7f7a19c72"}}
{"id": "067eaa557f4b60f5", "prompt": "J'ai oublié de mettre à jour la version dans `Cargo.toml` et `CHANGELOG.md` après la dernière merge. Peux-tu incrémenter la version mineure (10.6.0), ajouter une entrée générique dans le CHANGELOG pour aujourd'hui, et m'assurer que le build est propre ensuite ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "067eaa557f4b60f5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:1606b65bb704", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5d93e73-7b0f-46b4-a246-bf04a5ca0a99"}}
{"id": "d74d54ef0e7f75ba", "prompt": "The build is failing on CI. It looks like a dependency mismatch. Can you check Cargo.lock and see if there are any conflicting versions of common crates?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d74d54ef0e7f75ba", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:594c1fa34333", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "105de86a-60dd-4053-917a-cf2d5aa6abf2"}}
{"id": "da2661a3a3c38d3d", "prompt": "Where are the gitignore patterns actually loaded and applied during the walk? I'm trying to optimize performance and want to see if we're re-reading `.gitignore` for every directory or caching it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "da2661a3a3c38d3d", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:bc0d6c2176b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1901fe8f-5dca-4ebb-a8b2-32d386f7e787"}}
{"id": "f3f59aa380267f2c", "prompt": "Check `src/exec/job.rs`. How does the execution of a command handle the case where multiple files match the pattern?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it run them in parallel or sequentially?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f3f59aa380267f2c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:83909f34ea20", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c9935f38-2faa-44a8-a230-91308e3dcc11"}}
{"id": "b0afa456b1e155fb", "prompt": "C'è un file `target/` locale che stiamo accidentalmente tracciando in alcune branch sperimentali. Per favore, assicurati che `target/` sia presente nel `.gitignore` in modo che non venga mai committato per errore. Controlla anche se ci sono altri pattern temporanei che mancano.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b0afa456b1e155fb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:55c9ba15839f", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d7b15fe-ea70-4988-be16-05629e20f40c"}}
{"id": "8b7195916431d1c0", "prompt": "can you show me the commit message for ce97e47?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8b7195916431d1c0", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:1ab8ab096610", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b931b3e-5f3a-4159-8c6b-232a71322dea"}}
{"id": "9749ebf9be52b390", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify src/walk.rs and why did they make the change?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the actual diff for that commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9749ebf9be52b390", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:e613435cd00b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39b53e6f-25d7-4d04-a186-c20a05f9bd1a"}}
{"id": "fb4773e454690866", "prompt": "Dove è definita la struttura `Config` nel file `src/config.rs`? Fammi vedere i primi 50 campi.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb4773e454690866", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:7609e695336c", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e0d9e74-d17c-4da7-afcf-fac6948b4a99"}}
{"id": "4299d2ea6eba1e27", "prompt": "I've been messing around with the regex logic in `src/regex_helper.rs` and `src/cli.rs` to support some custom flag stuff, but it's a mess. Can you look at my current changes, move them to a new branch called `feature/regex-flags`, and then commit them as two separate logical commits: one for the regex utility updates and one for the CLI argument parsing?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The first commit message looks a bit too brief, can you rewrite it to follow the conventional commits format?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4299d2ea6eba1e27", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:71714a7b4af5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a46e2e26-205c-4fa1-aae4-5d177f1f0133"}}
{"id": "f225f174ac98b022", "prompt": "regression: `fd --extension` doesn't work with multiple extensions in some cases\n\nI upgraded from 10.4 to 10.5 and now `fd --extension .rs --extension .toml` returns no results for files like `Cargo.toml` in the root of the repo, even though `fd Cargo.toml` finds it.\n\nThe filter logic in `src/filter/mod.rs` seems to be doing an intersection instead of a union for multiple `--extension` flags. It looks like the `FileFilter` struct applies all rules as AND conditions. Can you fix this so multiple `--extension` flags act as OR conditions?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a test in `tests/tests.rs` that verifies multiple extensions work as expected."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f225f174ac98b022", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:cbbbfe1eb362", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84a28464-df29-4036-9436-9f79d9f7630f"}}
{"id": "b0415c526758d7e7", "prompt": "I need a benchmark run on the current `main` branch. Please run `cargo bench` for the `find` benchmark specifically. I'm comparing performance against findutils.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b0415c526758d7e7", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:7724be10a658", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7cb54513-c893-4233-bc02-cd9e446baaa5"}}
{"id": "6914ac0427188776", "prompt": "The `src/exec/command.rs` module handles parallel command execution. When using `fd -x echo {}`, if the command exits with a non-zero status, `fd` continues to process other files without warning.\n\nI'd like to add a `--exit-error` flag (similar to GNU find's `-exec ... +` error handling) that stops processing and returns a non-zero exit code if any child process fails.\n\nStart by adding the argument to `src/cli.rs` and wiring it into the execution logic in `src/exec/job.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6914ac0427188776", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:e7c80ebbb17e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd0d0d65-491e-4c2f-a8f8-ee81129ce746"}}
{"id": "4d9156d3e3dea539", "prompt": "Ho notato che la versione nel Cargo.toml è ancora la 10.2.0, ma dobbiamo prepararci per la prossima release. Per favore, aggiorna la versione a `10.3.0` in Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock (se necessario) e aggiungi una voce nel CHANGELOG.md sotto la sezione `[Unreleased]` con un titolo generico 'Nuova versione'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ora, verifica che il progetto compili correttamente con le nuove versioni aggiornate."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4d9156d3e3dea539", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:e728405b9277", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c2121e8c-7891-40f1-aed4-d630a73bf3d2"}}
{"id": "dac2d050896d5cd0", "prompt": "Estou tendo problemas com a performance quando corro o fd em um diretório com milhões de arquivos. O que posso fazer?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dac2d050896d5cd0", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:18f54078be24", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f778ccd2-dfd7-4a84-b742-8e83f70064ba"}}
{"id": "7c34fc9c9a07b623", "prompt": "I found a warning in CI: 'hardcoded secret detected in tests'. Please check tests/testenv/mod.rs and tests/tests.rs. There might be an API key or password hardcoded in one of the test fixtures. I need to remove it ASAP.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Where exactly is the secret located?"}, {"prompt": "How do I replace this with an environment variable in the test code?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7c34fc9c9a07b623", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:f7f5f4a99eaf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f41e50ae-c56e-46fe-bdd4-cba72b1be1e2"}}
{"id": "ef321c832514c929", "prompt": "Where is the `smart_case` logic implemented? I need to understand how it decides to switch from case-insensitive to case-sensitive matching.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is this logic in the regex helper or the filter module?"}, {"prompt": "Show me where `smart_case` is initialized in config.rs"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ef321c832514c929", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:f316d217081b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a7572135-341e-4e4b-a599-f950f5df16a4"}}
{"id": "7d9465c7cf107b15", "prompt": "Why does `fd` ignore hidden files and directories by default? Is there a flag to override this, and if so, what is it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7d9465c7cf107b15", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:3a09b36488e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d97da9bc-1b41-49e9-a45f-a885d17e39eb"}}
{"id": "a39af615e3407b3a", "prompt": "Scan src/exec/command.rs and src/exec/job.rs for command injection vulnerabilities. Since fd allows running arbitrary commands, I need to be sure the sanitization logic in src/sanitize.rs is holding up against shell escaping edge cases. Specifically, look for cases where user input might leak into the command string without proper quoting.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What are the most dangerous edge cases you found in the sanitization logic?"}, {"prompt": "Does the current test suite cover the injection scenarios you identified?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a39af615e3407b3a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:6e26b7508129", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ae705d91-011a-4993-b08d-4479a18689be"}}
{"id": "74cc83fa3e760fe9", "prompt": "Add support for the `--json-lines` flag to the CLI. It should serialize each matched file path as a single JSON line to stdout, using the `serde_json` crate. Update `src/cli.rs` to add the argument and `src/main.rs` to handle the output mode. Do not break existing plain text output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "74cc83fa3e760fe9", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:f8bb29f72890", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7fa01b88-89ec-4773-9504-b661707fe779"}}
{"id": "2be21131782ddc45", "prompt": "Could you add some technical documentation to src/error.rs explaining the different error variants and how they should be handled by the caller?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2be21131782ddc45", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:70fb7b13c9b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c77a30c-7f97-4a09-a7e7-151b19f3de24"}}
{"id": "d3d77ba249638b03", "prompt": "I'm getting some weird output when using regex patterns. Can you look at `src/regex_helper.rs` and tell me how the regex is being compiled and applied to the filenames?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3d77ba249638b03", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:87a55e32f97c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "77e62bab-582c-4aed-8546-803255077e32"}}
{"id": "1e4771b4cf253bd0", "prompt": "We need to standardize how we handle file system paths. Currently `src/dir_entry.rs` and `src/filesystem.rs` use `PathBuf` and `&Path` somewhat interchangeably. Please review `src/dir_entry.rs` and ensure that all public APIs take `&Path` where possible and only convert to `PathBuf` internally.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e4771b4cf253bd0", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:42dd92979243", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d585d7d4-0b4f-4801-a1b3-7b4432c32698"}}
{"id": "bd0646d21ce8ba45", "prompt": "In src/walk.rs, we call `Entry::path()`. I'm trying to understand if there is a performance difference between returning `&Path` vs `PathBuf` for the return type of this method in the latest `walkdir` version. Check the crate's changelog or docs for any mentions of this optimization.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bd0646d21ce8ba45", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:2ec2db865ef1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b668b4e-3f55-4b70-b1b0-0a9ada608887"}}
{"id": "8c77b5df6434f7c8", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the exit code handling. Where are the values for `EXIT_SUCCESS`, `EXIT_FAILURE`, etc. defined in src/exit_codes.rs, and where are they actually returned in the main application flow?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8c77b5df6434f7c8", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:d8de328ec7ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bbacb7dd-0cc3-47aa-a93e-37246ad6e782"}}
{"id": "f77adc1fb3be2d6e", "prompt": "Can you look at my current uncommitted changes in src/cli.rs and src/error.rs? They are a bit of a mess. Split them into two separate logical commits: one for the new CLI arguments and one for the new error variants. Make sure the commit messages follow the project's style.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f77adc1fb3be2d6e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:986f69bc3a4a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "576fb80e-f320-493e-98f0-dea7fb427f37"}}
{"id": "f5a7d23f59664657", "prompt": "I need a unique secret key to use as an environment variable for the testing of `src/sanitize.rs`. Give me something high-entropy.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f5a7d23f59664657", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:7aa64a0b426e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6044a0d-2d09-46f7-98c8-595f82dc1e7d"}}
{"id": "48a7c2670a848bfa", "prompt": "check git blame on src/walk.rs to see who modified the symlink handling logic last", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "show me the diff for that commit"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "48a7c2670a848bfa", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:6a1a55c835f0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9595319f-790b-4e25-a058-e0da3db1f606"}}
{"id": "02ba7da7c7c3cdf5", "prompt": "Commit all my current changes. Use a good descriptive message for each one.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "02ba7da7c7c3cdf5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:99d6e3d76379", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a77ed6fb-9649-4b1f-bd02-389f152ecb56"}}
{"id": "050edfa34cc3570a", "prompt": "The README mentions smart case behavior. Can we add a more detailed example or a small table in the 'Features' section that shows exactly when it switches from case-insensitive to case-sensitive?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "050edfa34cc3570a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:dbdbf0397cfe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a634e17-85c8-423d-824a-e4dac5ccccfe"}}
{"id": "f4d4a05ea6495924", "prompt": "where is the smart case logic defined? i need to know where it decides to switch from case-insensitive to case-sensitive based on the input pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f4d4a05ea6495924", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:debc4a12b14f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e7a16e19-a9f0-48eb-bc18-11c8b3a3793d"}}
{"id": "2ec60edecc6d0d4b", "prompt": "I'm halfway through fixing a bug in src/walk.rs but the current state is broken and won't compile. Stash my current changes so I can switch to the main branch to check something.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ec60edecc6d0d4b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:904a4f613003", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37463087-7d2e-4d67-a2e7-0eed63844655"}}
{"id": "51a1439a92e2a490", "prompt": "fix: hidden files are not being ignored when using `--no-ignore` but providing a specific path\n\nI noticed that running `fd --no-ignore /tmp/my_test` still shows `.git` folders inside /tmp/my_test if they exist. The README says it ignores hidden dirs by default, but `--no-ignore` should probably respect explicit patterns or at least not re-include hidden dirs if they weren't explicitly requested? Actually, wait, `--no-ignore` disables `.gitignore` but should it still hide dotfiles? I feel like `fd` should have a `--hidden` flag behavior that is distinct from `--no-ignore`. \n\nLooking at `src/config.rs`, the default for `hidden` is `false`. But `src/walk.rs` seems to pass this down. Can you clarify or fix the interaction between `--no-ignore` and hidden file filtering in `src/walk.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "51a1439a92e2a490", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:7079a826341b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5359fb33-7871-483a-b621-8b66bb55db33"}}
{"id": "55169b3086a1cc76", "prompt": "I'm seeing a panic in src/exec/command.rs when running fd -x with a command containing a literal tab character. Can you trace the path from the CLI argument parsing in src/cli.rs down to where the command string is split?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "55169b3086a1cc76", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:00515f6abb02", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cdb65a7-3e1e-486b-ba81-4a58e706607c"}}
{"id": "c8502f71fe96b88e", "prompt": "In `src/config.rs`, we're configuring `ignore::Gitignore` for filtering. I want to make sure we are correctly handling the `--no-ignore` override. Can you check the official `ignore` crate documentation (or its README on GitHub) to confirm if `Gitignore::add_standard_ignore` ignores VCS folders? I need to know if there's a specific method to skip .git entirely or if we rely on the `.gitignore` files inside the repository.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, if we need to specifically ignore .git at the top level without loading all .gitignore files, is there a simpler API call in the latest version?"}, {"prompt": "Great, can you update the `Gitignore` construction logic in `src/config.rs` to reflect that?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8502f71fe96b88e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:b5929a999d51", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "34e1904f-5958-4706-a8d3-29c90f9dc6e4"}}
{"id": "076de150bfdd18c4", "prompt": "We're using `regex` 1.13.1 now. Can you check the regex-rs release notes or changelog for any changes to error handling or backtracking limits? I want to make sure we aren't accidentally hitting a new default limit in `src/regex_helper.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "076de150bfdd18c4", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:3d10e077cdcd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87bb194e-fd7b-49a8-bf69-0945c35303ad"}}
{"id": "09987895b7fefe38", "prompt": "Adicione um novo teste unitário em `tests/tests.rs` para validar o comportamento do filtro de tamanho definido em `src/filter/size.rs`. Use um exemplo simples de busca por arquivos menores que 1KB.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "09987895b7fefe38", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:796510b1ac7b", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c51bb515-dca5-4399-8c57-8fdac4195fc7"}}
{"id": "f7f35f1c47a12b63", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug an issue with file type filtering. Can you run just the test for filetypes?\n\n```\ncargo test test_filetypes\n```", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f7f35f1c47a12b63", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:bd2ddeb849d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70d4e3ed-b711-4810-8445-7efcacf791fa"}}
{"id": "8bf276c1468b083a", "prompt": "Run the test for `test_exec_with_separator` specifically. I'm working on the Windows compatibility fix and need to see if that specific case passes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8bf276c1468b083a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:3b7f7ae5db09", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8ca6a0eb-4df8-4384-b1f7-29c0bfd7f72e"}}
{"id": "79c211b1a0355845", "prompt": "I need to audit our dependencies. Please parse `Cargo.toml` and `Cargo.lock` to generate a simple text report listing all dependencies, their current versions, and whether they are direct or transitive.\n\nAlso, check the `Cross.toml` to see which target platforms we currently support for cross-compilation.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you format that as a CSV instead?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "79c211b1a0355845", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:96d970783671", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "88e8e1cc-edcc-4c07-9bbc-1991572d1d29"}}
{"id": "c80db4cd873ab910", "prompt": "In `src/error.rs`, update the error message for filesystem access errors to be more descriptive. Instead of just 'permission denied', try to include the path that caused the issue.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c80db4cd873ab910", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:517c3ac071ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6529c3ee-ba00-4c85-945b-127283f27207"}}
{"id": "5e05010e85ddcbe1", "prompt": "The `Smartcase` behavior mentioned in the README—where is that defined in the code? Is it in `src/cli.rs` or somewhere else?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e05010e85ddcbe1", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:edbb15f34dfb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5c7f957-9756-4767-887f-34459360e08d"}}
{"id": "0b1548bfaa09a0cc", "prompt": "Can you explain how the directory traversal works in `src/walk.rs`? I want to understand how it handles parallelization.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it use a specific thread pool or just spawn threads?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b1548bfaa09a0cc", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:0f7dbb0ddf8c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f6a894b-6eac-4a3b-9022-f0cea582c307"}}
{"id": "ec95440fbd4a6f0c", "prompt": "I'm looking at the README and I see `fd` is touted as an alternative to `find`. What are the specific design choices or \"opinionated defaults\" that distinguish it from GNU find? Specifically, how does it handle hidden files and .gitignore patterns out of the box?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ec95440fbd4a6f0c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:cc04f45a11d0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "661d5cdf-c680-44cd-b56e-6b1dbc8f5251"}}
{"id": "28811a59350ed3d1", "prompt": "Estou tentando usar `fd` para encontrar arquivos que começam com 'config' e terminam com '.yml' no diretório /etc. Como eu escrevo essa expressão regular?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "28811a59350ed3d1", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:90d2d7676216", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de373a4c-7250-4575-9cd7-6518e84a087a"}}
{"id": "9a92613f44d092a1", "prompt": "Run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` across the whole workspace. If clippy finds any warnings or errors, fix them automatically. Then push the changes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did clippy report any remaining issues?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9a92613f44d092a1", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:80326d4b0435", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1d332f6-acb6-4572-888b-303c2124ac03"}}
{"id": "93c7f0cf8a74cbaf", "prompt": "The CLI feels a bit cluttered. I want to clean up the argument parsing. Look into `src/cli.rs` and see if we can group the existing flags better. While you're at it, check `src/config.rs` to see if any of the configuration logic should actually be handled by the CLI parser instead of being loaded separately. I want a cleaner separation of concerns.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "93c7f0cf8a74cbaf", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "fd:51d9dd9c9d0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9b18266-bb56-4c30-baa1-07c7f1917a9f"}}
{"id": "e05b97be03bee1d7", "prompt": "Please run the linter and formatter check.\n\ncargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings\ncargo fmt --check", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e05b97be03bee1d7", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:0ead0926c833", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca4511c2-cc9e-4095-ae9f-031049cd5319"}}
{"id": "f0c99f3bce1c5119", "prompt": "Check Cargo.toml and let me know if any of our dependencies are outdated, specifically looking at regex and clap_complete.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the diff for updating regex to the latest version."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f0c99f3bce1c5119", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:70fa29093f45", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89063faf-c38b-44e0-bde3-0006af7e253e"}}
{"id": "e698d9f0212b8f67", "prompt": "I need to verify the structure of the `doc/` directory for a documentation site migration.\n\n1. List all markdown files in `doc/` and `./` (root).\n2. Check `contrib/completion/` and list the shell completion scripts generated there.\n3. Verify if `doc/fd.1` is valid man-page formatted text or just markdown. If it's markdown, please convert the key sections to roff format or just tell me what's missing.\n\nAlso, check `rustfmt.toml` to see what formatting config we enforce.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Please update `rustfmt.toml` to enforce `max_width = 100`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e698d9f0212b8f67", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:de8f4518c0ed", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a067fd7-fdb6-4c08-8aa3-51a55dc5f60b"}}
{"id": "e595b04e4f5cf3f0", "prompt": "Qual é a diferença entre usar `fd` sem argumentos e `ls -R`? O output seria idêntico?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "E o que acontece se eu quiser incluir arquivos ocultos e pastas ignoradas pelo git?"}, {"prompt": "Como faço para ver o tamanho dos arquivos no output?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e595b04e4f5cf3f0", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:8b99882b1ef8", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74671e8b-6e14-4a60-ac3d-abe7ce4c9e3a"}}
{"id": "903af2e148eed1de", "prompt": "Lanciami i test suite e fammi sapere se tutto passa. Se qualche test fallisce, incolla l'output dell'errore così posso investigare.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Se tutto passa, dammi anche il tempo totale di esecuzione."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "903af2e148eed1de", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:6d8710b3272a", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eba9f114-2583-4b07-b8b0-37034d7af72f"}}
{"id": "a42b34ae9a365441", "prompt": "We are using `walkdir` in src/walk.rs. I saw a changelog entry somewhere that mentioned a change in how symlink handling works in newer versions. Can you check the latest walkdir crate docs or GitHub releases to see if the `follow_links` method has changed its default behavior or signature for macOS vs Linux?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a42b34ae9a365441", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:bded1d4a2ecb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2effa951-2fcc-4501-9f92-99caae3bbede"}}
{"id": "544ab079906d1e07", "prompt": "Compare the commit ce97e47 with the one before it. What specifically changed in the symlink handling?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "544ab079906d1e07", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:f27081f954e9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2139a9e3-7cca-4961-9c4e-1e410e1661ab"}}
{"id": "6086142f7752af09", "prompt": "Why are the build artifacts in my root directory causing merge conflicts? Please add the following patterns to `.gitignore` if they aren't already there:\n\n/target/\n*.d\n*~\n.swo\n*.swp\n\nMake sure not to ignore `doc/logo.png` or `Cargo.lock`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6086142f7752af09", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:909c542f4acb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3eb4d10b-8c1f-4d22-8291-7a9d5499c4b7"}}
{"id": "c470d481c9a50e48", "prompt": "Wait until the `Cargo.lock` file stops changing for 5 seconds. I'm running a heavy build and want to make sure dependencies are fully resolved before I run the suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c470d481c9a50e48", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:9a39e1889b36", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d12372d-b186-4d14-97a9-3b1cf9ad75d0"}}
{"id": "d50325b8cc50a634", "prompt": "Preciso de ajuda com a estrutura de build. Rodando `cargo build --release` está caindo de forma estranha no ambiente de CI.\n\nAqui está o arquivo `Cross.toml`. Parece que a configuração para o alvo `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` está um pouco desatualizada comparada à documentação do Cargo.\n\n1. Verifique se os caminhos do linker estão absolutos e corretos.\n2. Compare com as definições de `[target.'cfg(target_os = \"macos\")']` para ver se a consistência de variáveis de ambiente está seguindo o padrão do projeto.\n3. Me diga se você acha que a variável `CC` está sendo herdada corretamente para o target arm.\n\nNão mude nada ainda, apenas me diga o que parece errado.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ok, me sugira a correção no TOML para garantir que o `CC` e `CXX` passem pelo target do cross-compilation se eles não forem definidos na variável de ambiente do host."}, {"prompt": "Depois da correção, rode `cargo check --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` localmente se possível, ou me mostre o comando exato que eu devo rodar para validar no meu host x86_64."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d50325b8cc50a634", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:a0dedd12069c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33b197b0-ca6d-4281-b861-9f2f3a943a24"}}
{"id": "8233637880289876", "prompt": "Check if there are any hanging `fd` processes running on my machine. I think one of the parallel traversal jobs got stuck in `src/walk.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8233637880289876", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:bc654ef2bc36", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7cfc939f-26c1-40a6-b46f-b92c81a57f94"}}
{"id": "1aea7828076237bf", "prompt": "Refactor the file type detection logic. Currently, `src/filetypes.rs` and `src/dir_entry.rs` have overlapping logic for determining if a path is a directory, symlink, or regular file. \n\nExtract this logic into a single helper function in `src/dir_entry.rs` and update all callers, including those in `src/output.rs` and `src/walk.rs`, to use this unified approach. Ensure we don't regress on the symlink handling edge cases we saw in #2106.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1aea7828076237bf", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:3ab8f2139935", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b532149-d624-44cc-a74c-8ec6aebe599e"}}
{"id": "636045228c7dd17f", "prompt": "I need to overhaul how we handle file filtering to prepare for some new features. Can you take a pass at the following:\n1. Audit `src/filter/mod.rs` and its submodules (`owner.rs`, `size.rs`, `time.rs`) to ensure we aren't duplicating any logic from `src/dir_entry.rs`.\n2. Check `src/walk.rs` to see if the current traversal logic is efficiently applying these filters or if we're filtering too late in the pipeline.\n3. Update `tests/tests.rs` to include more edge cases for the size and time filters.\n\nLet me know when you have a draft of the refactor plan.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "636045228c7dd17f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "fd:3f89484f3749", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78f8a51a-b5c6-48d3-9b48-aeb3562bf8e8"}}
{"id": "a5b1790cc612a812", "prompt": "Oops, I just realized I committed the wrong version of `src/config.rs`. Can you revert the last commit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a5b1790cc612a812", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:31723ace1174", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e62ae6cc-6133-4fdc-819c-27189cd99a31"}}
{"id": "3754c807fff4f0e4", "prompt": "I've been hacking away at `src/filter/size.rs` and `src/filter/time.rs`. Can you look at my uncommitted changes, split them into two separate commits—one for size filter improvements and one for time filter fixes—and then push them to a new branch called `feature/filter-updates`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Write a detailed commit message for the size filter commit including a brief description of the logic change."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3754c807fff4f0e4", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:d281fbaa3b95", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc1b3776-cd27-47f2-822f-ba0c275975fa"}}
{"id": "95e82cead66c12cf", "prompt": "Please look up the latest documentation for the `ignore` crate (version 0.4.33). I want to confirm exactly which gitignore patterns are supported by default now. Specifically, does it handle `.gitignore` files in subdirectories recursively out of the box, or do we need to configure `gitignore::Gitignore::new`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "95e82cead66c12cf", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:7906e9ac99ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ddb019f8-b94b-427d-b4e0-a30c0a1151e4"}}
{"id": "44bdfa34ac0076e5", "prompt": "How does the parallelized directory traversal actually work in `src/walk.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "44bdfa34ac0076e5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:1d0c081b6db9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e18b5a38-6d88-4e7e-a4c7-1165df8da0b0"}}
{"id": "40773369b37a9e3b", "prompt": "Check src/filter/mod.rs. I need to know how the different filter types (size, time, owner) are being applied during the walk process.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are these filters applied eagerly or lazily as we traverse the filesystem?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "40773369b37a9e3b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:4e2e2ea6f048", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a63b03d-0bf8-47c6-975a-a79bc6770ca8"}}
{"id": "f044f856e339ea2a", "prompt": "Add a new error variant to `src/error.rs` for 'permission denied' specifically when scanning directories, and update `src/walk.rs` to use it. Once that's done, commit it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, don't commit yet. Just show me the diff for the changes in `src/walk.rs` first."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f044f856e339ea2a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:0ed3455c4f3e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f91b3c17-d26b-4707-ab00-faba9236da2a"}}
{"id": "52c57648933029aa", "prompt": "Refactor the filter logic. Currently `src/filter/mod.rs` has a mix of traits and structs. Please extract each filter type (owner, size, time) into its own module if they aren't already, and create a unified `apply_filters` helper in `src/walk.rs` that iterates over a list of filters instead of having nested if-statements.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "52c57648933029aa", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:15ebc2a4adbb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b53dc82-3573-4094-a15d-5e0919ade7d0"}}
{"id": "eabac0e47aba8d78", "prompt": "Start the program in the background listening for changes, and pipe the output to a log file. I want to stress test the file watching capabilities with a script I wrote. Let it run for at least 2 minutes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eabac0e47aba8d78", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:852908eb549f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8954b7d4-7ead-4beb-871c-91515f697ad6"}}
{"id": "40b6f61ca82e95be", "prompt": "Wie ist der aktuelle Status der CI-Pipeline auf GitHub Actions für das Repo `sharkdp/fd`? Ich habe gerade einen Branch gepusht und möchte wissen, ob die Builds gegen main gerade laufen oder ob es Ausfälle gibt. Bitte prüfe die Actions-Page live.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "40b6f61ca82e95be", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:e80d7f770608", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "68772531-3d72-4c18-a993-03644d2255bb"}}
{"id": "40ebed760cd3132b", "prompt": "Review src/filter/size.rs. I suspect there's a potential integer overflow or panic if a user passes a malformed size string to the --size filter. Can you trace the parsing logic and confirm it handles arbitrary lengths gracefully without crashing the process?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40ebed760cd3132b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "fd:a62c1983cf82", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f0efece-bd7d-4cb2-8c34-04311f4ebaf3"}}
{"id": "c889684a583de7d2", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with how pattern matching is handled. Walk me through the logic in src/regex_helper.rs that determines if we're doing a case-sensitive or case-insensitive search.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c889684a583de7d2", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:1fd7bb81a01f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0b6f9ba5-27a4-4bc3-9e72-51a51398b460"}}
{"id": "c8bf606c49b60852", "prompt": "Can you add a `--max-depth` flag to the CLI? I see we have depth logic in `src/walk.rs` and `src/cli.rs`. Needs to be integrated so it limits the recursion level.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8bf606c49b60852", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:f978191a7ee2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e86ab3ca-f96c-4b7f-8f98-e94306b821b2"}}
{"id": "b66363e93a58bf1a", "prompt": "Como funciona o 'Smart Case' do fd? Ele é sempre habilitado?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b66363e93a58bf1a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:9f65b4c67ea6", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca82792e-fcc4-46d7-ad05-bf1f7e27f3fd"}}
{"id": "82636f0a8ba73ed5", "prompt": "Ho bisogno di fare un po' di pulizia. Rimuovi tutti i file e le directory generati dalla build nell'albero dei file corrente, ma assicurati di non cancellare nulla che sia sotto controllo versione. Puoi usare i comandi standard di make o cargo per questo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "82636f0a8ba73ed5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:af0a4d006d85", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2d9b246-a04f-4e71-8f7c-10b0ac3f5b00"}}
{"id": "d62c5aa2b174fa64", "prompt": "Quero verificar rapidamente se alguma pasta no meu projeto atual começa com 'test'. Qual comando rodaria isso?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d62c5aa2b174fa64", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:8c9bffc504d4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4a05e3f-62c2-46cc-860d-7d8ecdc6cc69"}}
{"id": "c8d67921919f3dca", "prompt": "The test `test_exec_with_separator` in tests/tests.rs is failing on my local Windows build. Can you show me the definition of that test and the `testenv` module it relies on so I can debug the environment setup?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do we have any other tests that specifically target Windows-only behavior?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c8d67921919f3dca", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:55ea58e8fd28", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3989b980-c357-423e-ab2a-df2d23de90e5"}}
{"id": "9a9b17336c9d9384", "prompt": "Kannst du mir einen Screenshot von der neuesten Release-Seite auf GitHub für `fd` machen? Ich will schnell sehen, welche neuen Features oder Breaking Changes in der neuesten Version gelistet sind, ohne die Seite manuell zu öffnen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9a9b17336c9d9384", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:8f1c7d9c7dcb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "814ca32f-e982-42f1-9a20-9824f74dcce2"}}
{"id": "d318ec86110b1f4f", "prompt": "where is the default ignore pattern loading handled? i.e. when --no-ignore is not passed, how are .gitignore files picked up.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d318ec86110b1f4f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:8f7ee097ba9d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35e23041-f319-4ff4-b3cb-640ee9e3737f"}}
{"id": "ec015062c5f37906", "prompt": "Please run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features` and fix any obvious errors. Do not fix pedantic warnings unless they are actual bugs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ec015062c5f37906", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:2cc8ec3501cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3b94e65-c152-41ec-8b84-5e45ad19ac9c"}}
{"id": "545b0f182463cefc", "prompt": "Start the binary in the background so I can pipe some commands into it. I want to test the `--exec` behavior with a large directory.\n\n```bash\ncargo run -- --type f /var/log | head -n 100\n```\nWait, actually I just need the dev server running. Start `cargo run` and keep it open.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "545b0f182463cefc", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:7fe93ef23859", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3b5c5ed-efb8-49fc-91cf-83ad0b6c527d"}}
{"id": "63ffe0017bb5dbaa", "prompt": "compare the current version of src/error.rs with the version from commit 1e07fcb", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63ffe0017bb5dbaa", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:7e8738d4f954", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eac53d83-4320-46e2-bf07-def0a75e0fc3"}}
{"id": "1604f784dab57bba", "prompt": "Can you look at the `cross` tool documentation (Cross.toml)? We changed the target for our CI builds. I need to know if the `apk` environment setup has changed in the latest version of `cross` to ensure our Dockerfile scripts in `scripts/` are still valid.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1604f784dab57bba", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:3e7a6f7821f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21c0db24-3695-451f-bc9c-2ed6aa27b856"}}
{"id": "9016cccbad9ac7eb", "prompt": "List all branches in this repo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9016cccbad9ac7eb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:9b8a60a1d11d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c9c8b6e9-e14e-4734-b278-2f48658bf37e"}}
{"id": "13a851a076999fd5", "prompt": "It looks like `src/main.rs` is doing too much work in `main()`. Please extract the CLI parsing, config initialization, and walker setup into a new `run()` function in `src/main.rs`, and potentially a `AppConfig` struct in `src/config.rs` to hold all the arguments. I want `main` to be essentially just `fd::run().unwrap_or_else(handle_error)`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "13a851a076999fd5", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:9da7068f2f17", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9544ed1e-1e55-47d2-934c-4bf9c85f924d"}}
{"id": "c6415a1919fcad7c", "prompt": "the symlink depth check is failing on a broken symlink\n\nWhen I run `fd -L --max-depth 1 broken_link` on a symlink that points to a non-existent target, `fd` crashes with:\n\n```\nError: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: \"No such file or directory\" }\n```\n\nThis happens in `src/dir_entry.rs` when it tries to resolve the real path. I thought `--follow` was supposed to follow symlinks and report them even if they are broken, just like `find -L`. Please fix `src/dir_entry.rs` to handle broken symlinks gracefully during the depth walk.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run `cargo test` to make sure this doesn't break existing symlink tests."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c6415a1919fcad7c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:50425e5cb5eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "603bf4b6-9527-458b-bb25-8c3cdfd0190f"}}
{"id": "30f805c576f5722e", "prompt": "Analyze `src/cli.rs`. How is the 'smart case' logic implemented for the search pattern?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "30f805c576f5722e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:0ee95767c0cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9da577f4-b807-44c6-affe-513ab8d4a33c"}}
{"id": "a09de959ffef8c5e", "prompt": "Esegui `rustfmt` su tutto il codice sorgente in `src/` e `tests/` e controlla se ci sono errori di linting (`cargo clippy`). Se ci sono fix automatici disponibili per `clippy`, applicali. Fammi sapere se ci sono problemi.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Per favore, mostrami un riepilogo dei file modificati."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a09de959ffef8c5e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:0492ab131b87", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "34734354-8e63-474e-8df9-bd9d5005a6c0"}}
{"id": "b30acea0a95fe48b", "prompt": "Meu `fd` está ignorando arquivos que estão dentro de pastas ocultas (começando com .). Existe uma flag para forçar a busca dentro delas sem precisar escrever um regex complexo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b30acea0a95fe48b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:8eeb23f6c052", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "49ee7b5d-7d84-46eb-b5c9-eabd40367962"}}
{"id": "117ad6b67daa6bb8", "prompt": "We need to move to a newer version of the `ignore` crate. Check Cargo.toml and update it, but be careful since we rely heavily on it in src/walk.rs for filesystem traversal.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "117ad6b67daa6bb8", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:98c222e6c466", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a5b2844-4525-4522-af74-a5d7c3587d35"}}
{"id": "b79d03b86b038d21", "prompt": "The error handling in `src/walk.rs` and `src/exec/mod.rs` is inconsistent. Some places use `anyhow::Result` while others use our custom `src/error.rs` types. I want to standardize on using our custom error types for all I/O and regex errors, falling back to `anyhow` only when absolutely necessary. \n\nRefactor the public API in `src/walk.rs` and `src/exec/mod.rs` to return our custom error types where possible. Update the callers in `src/main.rs` to handle these errors consistently using the existing `src/error.rs` definitions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b79d03b86b038d21", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:8ff4bc90b156", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8e679627-3d07-45a1-bac2-ac6b107e6b74"}}
{"id": "6d639ca79f68c14d", "prompt": "I see there's a `Cross.toml` and a `Makefile`. What is the process for building this project for cross-platform targets, especially Windows?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6d639ca79f68c14d", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:4620e0ffaa25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af2b4ad9-ede9-4d1b-bc04-8b3e594f2fb3"}}
{"id": "646df55001033451", "prompt": "I'm seeing a regression in `src/walk.rs`. If a directory has no read permissions, `fd` prints a scary error about `Permission denied` to stderr for *every* file inside that directory, even though it successfully skips the directory.\n\nIt should probably print the permission error once for the directory itself and then ignore the contents. \n\nCan you refactor the error handling in the walker callback to suppress per-file errors for entries inside an inaccessible directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "646df55001033451", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:8dcb4d968825", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bcdf24b9-23ea-4822-9f08-7cd73331bee3"}}
{"id": "8910a216a28339f8", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of `unwrap()` calls in `src/exec/command.rs` and `src/exec/job.rs`. Please replace them with proper error handling using `?` and propagate errors up to the exit code handlers defined in `src/exit_codes.rs`. Don't change the logic, just make the error paths explicit.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `src/error.rs` needs new error variants."}, {"prompt": "Run `cargo test` to make sure behavior hasn't changed."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8910a216a28339f8", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:36a8fc4c03e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e22968f3-6e03-47c5-af8e-412a24eb74bb"}}
{"id": "c87a6baa38a47a5e", "prompt": "Update the version in `CHANGELOG.md` for the new 10.6.0 release. I've pasted the changes below.\n\n- feat: add --no-ignore-vcs\n- fix: handle unicode normalization better\n- perf: optimize symlink traversal\n\nMake sure to add today's date to the header and update the `Cargo.toml` version as well.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks. Now update the `README.md` badges if the version bump requires it, otherwise leave them alone."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c87a6baa38a47a5e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:1d5c02f5a493", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3119fe06-4d6c-42b1-8d53-571dc25f50ce"}}
{"id": "df028b7b7d0012b6", "prompt": "Check the clap documentation for the latest stable version. I see we use `Arg::long_description` in src/cli.rs. I think the API changed in clap 4.x. Can you find the current correct method to set the long help text for an argument so we don't get compilation errors?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If there's a migration guide, link it, otherwise just tell me the new method signature for setting long help on a clap Argument."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "df028b7b7d0012b6", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:a4e92c391095", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd337051-28f7-4cee-83cc-a823d41f109b"}}
{"id": "d034a654d603fd99", "prompt": "Can you explain how the directory traversal is parallelized? I'm looking at src/walk.rs and want to understand how it distributes work across threads.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d034a654d603fd99", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:df05a9c92034", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd30e050-cd85-4be4-9c6e-c3738dd42e7e"}}
{"id": "0fa85b49a50367fb", "prompt": "Can you spin up an interactive terminal? I need to jump into the `tests/testenv/` directory and poke around the mock filesystem.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0fa85b49a50367fb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:e121b4fa7f7c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4f7473d-553c-4a03-905a-c8f76162bb12"}}
{"id": "796be681480d675b", "prompt": "Can you add a small doc comment to the `RegexHelper` struct in `src/regex_helper.rs` explaining that it's used for pattern matching? Once that's done, create a new branch called `docs/regex-helper` and commit the change.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now commit everything else I've been working on to this branch, splitting it into logical commits if needed."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "796be681480d675b", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:398ea11d26c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89eac513-8110-41f2-86c2-5c81e2ceebad"}}
{"id": "b36cfabe63eab667", "prompt": "I want to add `serde` with `derive` features to the project. Update Cargo.toml accordingly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Verify if adding serde impacts any of the existing modules in src/config.rs."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b36cfabe63eab667", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:47d5392254ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0bfdd26-3c67-4e38-86fa-fd82c925e1b9"}}
{"id": "cd58938556276c04", "prompt": "I need to quickly switch to a different task but I'm in the middle of refactoring `src/walk.rs`. Stash my current changes so I have a clean working directory.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I'm back. Restore my work from the stash and let me know if there are any conflicts with the current head."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cd58938556276c04", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:b7635894e879", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85ca42ef-cd04-48cf-8396-befadbcdcc8a"}}
{"id": "82da4491e531c493", "prompt": "Ho visto un errore di compilazione riguardo a `exit_codes`. Dove sono definiti i codici di uscita personalizzati?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "82da4491e531c493", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:2944e0e956e9", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64ddc5ea-7692-4e51-a4b2-aa61d8bd394d"}}
{"id": "6570d45fb6af32b4", "prompt": "Ich muss wissen, ob die Website der `fd`-Projekts (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) gerade verfügbar ist. Kannst du einen HEAD-Request absetzen oder die Seite laden und mir den HTTP-Statuscode zurückgeben? Ich bekomme lokal keine Verbindung.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6570d45fb6af32b4", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:a0556dc7d11a", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa27c00b-d24b-4dc4-8895-85b131952b64"}}
{"id": "5ac4dc928d945dcb", "prompt": "In `src/dir_entry.rs`, the `is_symlink()` method returns `true` if the path is a symlink. However, we want to ignore broken symlinks by default unless `--follow` is enabled.\n\nCurrently, broken symlinks are still listed if they are in the root of the search, causing confusion. \n\nUpdate the filtering logic in `src/walk.rs` to skip broken symlinks unless the `follow_links` flag is set in the `Config`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ac4dc928d945dcb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:724cd4738869", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "822c4e8c-7b0d-4402-9dab-302fcbba48a0"}}
{"id": "a5b08d3f78dbfd13", "prompt": "I need a dummy API token for my local testing of the `src/exec/command.rs` logic. Just generate a random 32-char hex string.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a5b08d3f78dbfd13", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:8f4d984cd287", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78b46279-6bd8-4efe-a087-c8df53cee8ac"}}
{"id": "505383d5684999cd", "prompt": "The regex compilation in `src/regex_helper.rs` is caching patterns. I noticed that if I pass invalid regex syntax, the error message isn't helpful. It just says \"RegexError\".\n\nCan you update the error reporting in `src/main.rs` where the regex is initialized to include the underlying regex crate's error message? This helps users debug patterns like `[^` which currently just fail silently or with a generic message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "505383d5684999cd", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:d09a25581a0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d3918d90-cb38-4125-9ed6-362102c3a4cb"}}
{"id": "688c0d563065658e", "prompt": "We're getting reports of weirdness with command execution output formatting. Please investigate `src/exec/mod.rs` and `src/exec/job.rs`. I suspect the way we're grouping job outputs is causing interleaving issues when running in parallel. Also, look at `src/output.rs` to see if the sanitization logic there is clashing with how the exec module handles newlines.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "688c0d563065658e", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "fd:c5a8bd24cc77", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "404f9e90-50fc-4a09-b8df-66870e3f18db"}}
{"id": "f2a72205414da7fc", "prompt": "Ich suche nach der aktuellen CVE-Liste für das `regex` Crate, das hier als Abhängigkeit in Cargo.toml verwendet wird. Kannst du prüfen, ob es recent Sicherheitslücken (CVEs) für die aktuell genutzte Version gibt? Die Abhängigkeit ist im `Cargo.lock` definiert.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2a72205414da7fc", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:d2a40e9d15da", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9069547b-9559-45bb-b105-2e5389939bd3"}}
{"id": "60678a456312da32", "prompt": "I'm interested in the performance claims. The README mentions it's \"very fast.\" Is the speed coming from multi-threading? How does it handle large directories efficiently?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "60678a456312da32", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:4074e33324c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d84db1c-6d58-43e9-bfbf-ba98b071d115"}}
{"id": "dd23e47094e17dba", "prompt": "Ich suche nach einem neuen CVE für `jemalloc`, weil es in der Cargo.toml als Feature standardmäßig aktiviert ist (`default = [\"jemalloc\"]`). Ist jemalloc aktuell verwundbar? Prüfe bitte live auf NIST NVD oder ähnlichen Datenbanken.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dd23e47094e17dba", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:ce54361b24bb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "acd86559-b407-4f60-9996-89fbab30f7fa"}}
{"id": "059722b348896413", "prompt": "Show me the commit 68edfde and summarize the changes made to the walker.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "059722b348896413", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:430471ac4ebb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd47a740-a8a0-479d-a7e8-e8dfbd0cab1a"}}
{"id": "41abe25909a5ea5f", "prompt": "Run the full test suite. I need to be sure I haven't broken anything before pushing.\n\ncargo test", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "41abe25909a5ea5f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:6c863eb0a410", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3013d717-d713-4ddc-9831-7260ec177de3"}}
{"id": "d766b7eec02326c9", "prompt": "Refactor src/filter/owner.rs to use the `jiff` crate for time comparisons instead of the `time` crate. Update dependencies in Cargo.toml accordingly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d766b7eec02326c9", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:c6e291e20539", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1e68f59-2771-4a3d-bdbc-73a9244dbfd8"}}
{"id": "2920c78be72900d9", "prompt": "I'm getting a warning during build that I'd like to suppress. It's about an unused import in `src/cli.rs`. Can you run `cargo build` and let me know the exact line? I'm not going to touch it yet, just want to see the context.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check git blame for that line to see who introduced it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2920c78be72900d9", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:aa6bc5b7606b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b1b929c-80ab-456d-b816-75d98300b40f"}}
{"id": "fdbf93359d9c9d00", "prompt": "The test `test_exec_with_separator` is failing on my machine (macOS) with a permission error. \n\nHere is the output:\n\n```\nthread 'test_exec_with_separator' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`\nleft: `2`,\n right: `0`', tests/tests.rs:1234:5\n```\n\nCheck `src/exec/command.rs` and the test setup in `tests/testenv/mod.rs`. I suspect a race condition or a missing sync in the test harness.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fdbf93359d9c9d00", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:0ef7efc214d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfe3a59b-99fa-42d5-87d1-d1a8b5ca44c9"}}
{"id": "7b17844b7373f769", "prompt": "Can you explain the difference between the `-x` / `--exec` flag and the `-E` / `--exec-batch` flag? I want to run a command on each found file, but I'm unsure if the command is spawned once per file or once in total. I'm worried about performance if I'm processing thousands of files.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If I use --exec-batch, how can I set the maximum number of arguments per command?"}, {"prompt": "Does fd support passing environment variables to the executed command?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7b17844b7373f769", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:4a2e95214e04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53e7fef8-26fd-41be-98e4-2b5fc0b0e86b"}}
{"id": "6fed3cb018e26edb", "prompt": "I need to bump the version for the next release. Check `Cargo.toml`, `doc/release-checklist.md`, and any other places where the version string is hardcoded. Update them all to `10.6.0`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me a diff of the files you changed."}, {"prompt": "Did you update the changelog yet?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6fed3cb018e26edb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:b2ca249738d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53abc0b6-28ed-4a75-ba62-8a65bd62ad4a"}}
{"id": "288afbd088530d15", "prompt": "I just realized I forgot to add the doc comments to the new function in src/filesystem.rs in my last commit. Amend the last commit to include these comments.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "288afbd088530d15", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:2ecb3a1b5f87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8b62199-5382-429b-8562-64a641a5c737"}}
{"id": "1ea43f2be68c6afb", "prompt": "Check the official docs for `jiff` (the new time crate). I see we bumped it to 0.2.35. I need to know if the `Timestamp` struct has changed its public API in a way that would break our `src/filter/time.rs` implementation. Are we still supposed to use `Timestamp::now()`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1ea43f2be68c6afb", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:f6dde017318d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd6b846f-0d6a-4d28-a0e1-8fe942e3e270"}}
{"id": "b0e9c45fd7de8407", "prompt": "Help message doesn't explain the color options\n\nThis is a UX bug. `fd --help` lists `--color` but doesn't explicitly explain that `always` forces color even if stdout is not a TTY, which is useful for piping to `less -R`. \n\nCan you update `src/cli.rs` to add a clearer explanation for the `--color` flag's `always` option? Also, please update `doc/fd.1` to match the new help text.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure the man page generation script in `scripts/` is updated if necessary."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b0e9c45fd7de8407", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:707ae913a23b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ab56a4f-f4c1-4bed-b3ad-ffadd8c3e4cf"}}
{"id": "a2e055f491c80e50", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand why `fd` behaves differently than `find` when it comes to hidden files. Specifically, if I run `fd` in my home directory, it ignores `.bashrc` and `.config` directories by default. How can I override this behavior to include hidden files? Also, is there a way to make this the default for my user?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a2e055f491c80e50", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:a94a3068fe08", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c6e7774-67c9-48fa-a7e4-fa530db0823c"}}
{"id": "a5d0244904664e40", "prompt": "I need to know which files are responsible for parsing the `--size` argument. Is it all in `src/filter/size.rs` or is there clap logic in `src/cli.rs` that defines the argument before passing it through?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a5d0244904664e40", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:602c901bc10a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "71304c3d-ec8d-44de-92c9-f0d1e3a7c44b"}}
{"id": "eae1fb7c8e68a005", "prompt": "I'm looking for the logic that handles the `--exec` flag. Specifically, where is the command construction happening? I suspect it's in `src/exec/command.rs` but I want to be sure where the actual Vec of arguments is built.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the unit tests for that specific function?"}, {"prompt": "Also, where is the output buffering handled during execution?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eae1fb7c8e68a005", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:3c979dd2a2fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "190f8f7c-3a30-473c-9615-52742c768c02"}}
{"id": "2a06f9d9e94c272c", "prompt": "In `src/cli.rs`, we're passing `bool` flags directly to builder methods in many places. Can you refactor the CLI argument parsing to use `Option<bool>` or dedicated config structs where it makes sense, and update `src/config.rs` to handle these more explicitly? I want to reduce the coupling between the CLI definition and the runtime config.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2a06f9d9e94c272c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "fd:70e12beb82ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c666a3b1-e827-424f-98fd-dded7419af6e"}}
{"id": "876b9b145777a843", "prompt": "Qual è il file che gestisce l'esecuzione parallela dei comandi? Voglio capire come funziona il worker.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "876b9b145777a843", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:88945e5d3985", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "598682e4-6ad5-4b40-aa71-4db10eaa5e9d"}}
{"id": "89e25548f302b60a", "prompt": "I'm not happy with that last commit message. Can you amend the last commit to use a more conventional format like 'fix(cli): update help message wording'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "89e25548f302b60a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:558846c97425", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00ccdf71-0795-4e4f-a175-74d35025c3c2"}}
{"id": "ee7ebefeb208ab85", "prompt": "Oi, preciso que você analise o `Cargo.toml` e o `Cargo.lock` deste repositório. Vou subir essa dependência para um projeto de produção e preciso validar a saúde do ecossistema.\n\nPor favor:\n1. Conte quantas dependências do projeto são classificadas como 'dev-dependencies' versus as dependências principais.\n2. Identifique se alguma dependência tem múltiplas versões listadas no lockfile (o que indicaria conflitos ou re-resolução).\n3. Verifique se todas as dependências do core tem o campo `version` definido explicitamente ou se estão pegando qualquer versão (wildcard).\n\nMe retorne um resumo simples dos riscos encontrados.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Agora, por favor, olhe o `src/config.rs` e me diga se há alguma configuração hardcoded que dependa de versões específicas dessas bibliotecas, só para eu ter uma base se eu precisar dar um upgrade."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ee7ebefeb208ab85", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:542a9de35947", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dab6590e-e46f-4d23-8012-aec5953673d0"}}
{"id": "b9d0c6fe0bf5bf0f", "prompt": "Check `src/exec/job.rs` and tell me how job execution state is managed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b9d0c6fe0bf5bf0f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:05712bee15c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4d9ba06-17d9-4ae9-a768-c6d166bf91d0"}}
{"id": "4aa86d5d4f753863", "prompt": "Add a new test case in `tests/tests.rs` to ensure that the search handles empty patterns correctly without panicking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4aa86d5d4f753863", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:4cc65dff6461", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "931b7390-e241-4a93-92fa-638a5e7096b4"}}
{"id": "88cedd83f9de8a6f", "prompt": "Is there any reason not to upgrade `aho-corasick` to the latest version? Check if it might affect our pattern matching performance in src/regex_helper.rs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "88cedd83f9de8a6f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "fd:b1494231c790", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5f2b69e-7456-4603-9d92-f2f7aa68b177"}}
{"id": "ae0ce456686e4b7d", "prompt": "Devo sapere dove siamo rimasti. Cerca tutti i commenti `TODO` nel codice sorgente (`src/`) e dimmi quali sono. Voglio vedere file, riga e il testo del commento per ciascuno.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ae0ce456686e4b7d", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:4eac7d0cb2d4", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e67ea26-4007-4a99-b061-39210169f5b2"}}
{"id": "9bbe201846e6428d", "prompt": "Fix the linting errors caught by `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.\n\nOutput:\n```\nerror: this line exceeds the 100 character limit`\n```\n\nJust fix it, don't ask me for permission.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9bbe201846e6428d", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:7ea6cae9e8e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "826531f3-dcf6-4d88-9224-810354f8408b"}}
{"id": "6e13b27ec2e9a5bf", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the recommended migration path from `clap 3` to `clap 4` for the CLI argument parsing. Can you find the official migration guide for clap and summarize the breaking changes we might face with our current `src/cli.rs` setup? Specifically regarding subcommands.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Once you have the summary, highlight any specific APIs in `src/cli.rs` that use the old patterns so I can prioritize the updates."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6e13b27ec2e9a5bf", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:f53527caceea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3911790-6615-41a6-95ab-e7ba2f5bad93"}}
{"id": "0baeabdcd61eb504", "prompt": "I've been messing around with the regex logic in src/regex_helper.rs to make it more robust. Can you refactor the `RegexHelper` implementation to use lowercase for the internal flag check? Just do the code changes first, don't commit anything yet.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Now create a new branch called `feature/regex-robustness`, commit these changes with a descriptive message, and push it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0baeabdcd61eb504", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:1431a4036e07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "10a1ee4f-0255-4986-9673-b7c9dadda6a6"}}
{"id": "b92fe895eabdb5aa", "prompt": "I'm seeing a new dependency `aho-corasick` version 1.1.5 in Cargo.lock. Can you check the official upstream documentation or changelog for this crate to see if there are any breaking changes in the API since version 1.1.4? We need to make sure our regex usage hasn't regressed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b92fe895eabdb5aa", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "fd:e6605ca0eca1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1644cd5a-0152-4131-8d70-410a7d675c43"}}
{"id": "b378ba25684d1dff", "prompt": "Rename the function `sanitize` in `src/sanitize.rs` to `sanitize_path` and update all callers throughout the crate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b378ba25684d1dff", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "fd:6bff339e12e2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "642a2953-1d3e-4794-b1b6-5b54085567b0"}}
{"id": "207939dd16e776c6", "prompt": "Salut, je suis en train de mettre à jour `fd` vers la dernière version et je vois que le projet utilise `regex` et `aho-corasick`. Est-ce qu'il y a des CVE récentes ou publiées dans les derniers mois pour l'une de ces deux dépendances Rust ? Je veux m'assurer qu'on n'est pas vulnérable avant de mergé ma PR.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, si ce sont des vulnérabilités critiques, est-ce que les mainteneurs de ces crates ont déjà publié un patch stable dans les versions actuelles ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "207939dd16e776c6", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:c17721524fb9", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70eaf6f5-2e51-47b1-80c9-d179ebdb27a8"}}
{"id": "73d05a99debf9654", "prompt": "get the history of src/main.rs. I want to see why we added the smart case feature.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "73d05a99debf9654", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "fd:1c03dc7f9b98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d8b0813-b71e-41f6-ac3e-a684b4126812"}}
{"id": "c2e2bdb258c6e7fa", "prompt": "Set up a background process that watches `src/` for changes and automatically rebuilds with `cargo build --release` in `target/release/fd`. I want to leave this running while I make changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c2e2bdb258c6e7fa", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "fd:9f9d9335bad5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "debcf773-6def-405f-ad40-9498c465937d"}}
{"id": "bab3566c52bb8a3f", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the `src/` directory. I want a quick count of how many there are and where they are located so I can prioritize some refactoring.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bab3566c52bb8a3f", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "fd:b5e34e612ea3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f221dce-33f0-430d-a054-d15227d257cd"}}
{"id": "4a73ef5bb7dc1d6c", "prompt": "I'm seeing some potential issues with how we handle broken symlinks during directory traversal. Can you look at `src/walk.rs` and the recent changes in `ce97e47`? I want to make sure the 'broken symlink depth' fix hasn't introduced any regressions in how `max-depth` is calculated. Check `tests/testenv/mod.rs` to see if we can build a test case that specifically targets symlink loops.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4a73ef5bb7dc1d6c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "fd:9d6e969013f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4cbfa981-df3d-4b7d-b862-644a08c3c4ca"}}
{"id": "fa3f577e5cd3bc8c", "prompt": "Write a draft for the release notes for v10.5.0. Focus on the performance improvements in the directory walker and the fact that we've updated several dependencies in Cargo.toml.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make it sound more professional and suitable for a GitHub Release page."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fa3f577e5cd3bc8c", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "fd:281fcdef41a4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c402c3df-8570-47e6-894a-3725882b46bf"}}
{"id": "95dfe980c1b4ba99", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the project structure. Looking at the src directory, it seems pretty modular. Can you give me a high-level overview of what `cli.rs`, `config.rs`, and `walk.rs` are responsible for?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "95dfe980c1b4ba99", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "fd:2b71beebf7ad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fec3accc-f2cf-41af-985e-00b6b4d10406"}}
{"id": "a0ed404ec1b922e3", "prompt": "Fix the issue with `src/fmt/mod.rs`. The `--format` option crashes when using `{path}` and the path contains newlines.\n\nHere is the panic traceback:\n```\nthread 'main' panicked at 'byte index 3 is not a char boundary; it is inside '\\n' (bytes 2..3) of `foo\\nbar`', src/fmt/input.rs:42:23\n```\n\nLooks like we are slicing strings based on byte indices but the path contains multi-byte characters or control chars. Use `char` boundaries or `utf8_chunks` to handle this safely.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a0ed404ec1b922e3", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:66d71192057b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b686cd9-b2f4-4adb-9f80-8e096a973d20"}}
{"id": "4663a4a1e58e6faf", "prompt": "Cerca 'hyperlink' nei sorgenti. In quale file si trova la logica principale per la generazione degli hyperlink e qual è la funzione pubblica principale?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4663a4a1e58e6faf", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:850f2ba1b508", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ac07d41-fbab-46c8-b556-87daeac2c521"}}
{"id": "ecb62a9ae8a2f17a", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how `fd` handles the parallel execution of commands when using `-x` or `--exec`. Can you trace the code path from the CLI arguments in `src/cli.rs` through to the actual spawning of the subprocess? Specifically, where is the job pool created and managed in the exec module?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ecb62a9ae8a2f17a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "fd:41e9611b140d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e71ef01e-9459-43b4-bffa-3d6216baded9"}}
{"id": "e54c8e1412af0dab", "prompt": "I need to undo that last commit where I bumped the regex version in Cargo.toml. It was a mistake. Revert it immediately.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e54c8e1412af0dab", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:5b1316fe4036", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cd8c2382-caa1-4e8a-976b-bebe165fb526"}}
{"id": "211dd165bd8533c1", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error during the release process. Can you look at `scripts/create-archive.sh` and `scripts/create-deb.sh`?\n\nI suspect they are using hardcoded paths or the wrong version variable. Please refactor them to use the version defined in `Cargo.toml` dynamically.\n\nHere is the error I saw:\n```\nversion mismatch: Cargo.toml says 10.5.0 but script uses 10.4.0\n```", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "211dd165bd8533c1", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "fd:04b3c866bcaf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c900619a-f5ed-49c4-8951-ad8712f99178"}}
{"id": "d6d92fcae5719b3a", "prompt": "I have some quick fixes for the typos in README.md. Can you fix them and then commit them directly to the current branch?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d6d92fcae5719b3a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "fd:0ba76367b045", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af454878-40ed-4c68-b535-676618e03a90"}}
{"id": "01e63f82a35eb107", "prompt": "In `src/filter/size.rs`, the `Size` struct parses strings like `10M` into bytes. The current implementation for parsing the suffix seems to use a simple multiplication chain. \n\nI found a bug where `1.5M` fails to parse correctly because the float parsing or suffix handling is brittle. It panics with `InvalidSyntax` when passing `\"1.5M\"`.\n\nPlease look at the `FromStr` implementation for `Size` and fix it to support decimal values for kilobytes, megabytes, and gigabytes correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "01e63f82a35eb107", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "fd:7cd33e53aed9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3edc3173-f859-4935-a15c-0ea064b14153"}}
{"id": "cb3898ffe302bba3", "prompt": "Wir planen das Umbenennen des binary von `fd` auf `fdfind` (wie in den Completion-Scripts in `contrib/completion/` angedeutet). Kannst du prüfen, ob der aktuellste Release-Artifact auf GitHub Actions Downloads noch `fd` oder schon `fdfind` heißt? Ich brauche die live Info aus den Release Notes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wo genau muss ich in `src/main.rs` oder `Cargo.toml` nachschauen, um den Binary-Namen zu ändern, falls wir das noch nicht getan haben?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cb3898ffe302bba3", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "fd:38ed577cd0cc", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca5b8f99-ea13-4427-8218-9b6c10ee7cd6"}}
{"id": "b428364f59dbbe6a", "prompt": "I'm having trouble reproducing the symlink issue in `tests/tests.rs`. Open a bash session in the project root so I can manually mess with the filesystem and debug it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b428364f59dbbe6a", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "fd:ef2cc1b5b3ad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c4845e9-473c-48bd-8ef8-636a554c127a"}}
{"id": "a8c2999ceb8fa2da", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/filter/mod.rs`. How are the different filter types integrated into the main search loop?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a8c2999ceb8fa2da", "repo": "fd", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "fd:866e937111bb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "fd-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "986f5ae6-febc-4d4e-8758-f68fd34513af"}}
{"id": "a57e0fbdc4e83a88", "prompt": "Where is the `json_provider_class` attribute used in the application lifecycle? I want to see where it's instantiated and how it's attached to the app instance.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What's the default provider implementation?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any tests that mock a custom provider?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a57e0fbdc4e83a88", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:d300d3507103", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b1149bb-d3b5-4d3e-b7f9-d4309f1cd891"}}
{"id": "2830553c5544ce16", "prompt": "Can you count the lines of code in the main flask source directory (src/flask) excluding the json subdirectory? Just a quick metric for my report.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ignore binary files and generated stubs."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2830553c5544ce16", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:4aec87a3b4fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0041cf79-d78d-4ca3-9e7f-9224b5c717f6"}}
{"id": "ac69692cac5b0374", "prompt": "I'm trying to hit our staging API endpoint at https://api.staging-example.com/health but I keep getting a 502 Bad Gateway. Can you check the live response headers and body for that URL right now? The Nginx logs show 'upstream prematurely closed connection'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the response include any custom X-Error-Code headers?"}, {"prompt": "Is the site currently showing a maintenance page or is it just failing silently?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac69692cac5b0374", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:3a302b92b703", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3322f481-a8a7-4462-85e2-66de5e5ed538"}}
{"id": "ce9cbd7c7303e85f", "prompt": "I'm running a heavy migration. Can you write a script that polls the database or a specific file and only continues once it's ready?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ce9cbd7c7303e85f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:ff7975d1bdf2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfc910b6-509f-470a-9af5-9f9f97d859eb"}}
{"id": "4b16f82c9bd3411f", "prompt": "list all the branches in this repo", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4b16f82c9bd3411f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:bbc6b23b615a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "216ba73a-1737-4eb5-9777-892e3d6c8dc2"}}
{"id": "067107f8871de9b7", "prompt": "Add an entry to CHANGES.rst for the latest version. Include a 'Fixed' section for the IPv6 address parsing improvements and a 'New' section for the `app.query` decorator.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "067107f8871de9b7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:7663442166ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "579bc193-94b7-44fe-b2aa-8523716451a0"}}
{"id": "35b8fb0ea9c884c0", "prompt": "跑一下 mypy 检查类型错误：\n\nmypy src/flask\n\n报错信息太多，我只想看第一个错误。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "35b8fb0ea9c884c0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:11072f773945", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d46ebb16-f239-4cb8-9f4b-a9720e4ab7e3"}}
{"id": "b57ab6a5605a195c", "prompt": "I'm trying to reproduce an issue with the example app in `examples/tutorial/`. Can you clone that example directly from the GitHub repository at `https://github.com/pallets/flask/tree/main/examples/tutorial` and run the unit tests inside it? I suspect the `test_db.py` tests might be failing on my local setup due to some SQLite configuration, but I want to see the live output from a fresh clone first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b57ab6a5605a195c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:a599b0c7f985", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f13fda2f-bc33-4ed0-b710-4fbf2b412db7"}}
{"id": "ee35325124cff827", "prompt": "I need to understand where the 'Template not found' error message comes from. Is it in `src/flask/templating.py` or handled elsewhere?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ee35325124cff827", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:2e1ec4aca974", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "609a52f0-70fd-4ef9-87d7-5d4b0ddcb1e0"}}
{"id": "4d8ca846337f0fed", "prompt": "Where is the retry logic defined in the CLI app startup? I need to trace how Flask determines which app factory to call when running in a multi-app structure.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, now trace back from that function to see where the default loader is initialized."}, {"prompt": "Can you show me the test cases that verify this multiapp loading behavior?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4d8ca846337f0fed", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:9c9d6af6762f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2dd88d5-0edc-4d6e-96e4-fd72724c20af"}}
{"id": "d91497879b78c3d0", "prompt": "Please fix the JSON provider in `src/flask/json/provider.py`. The `default` method is raising a `TypeError` for `datetime` objects even though datetime support is supposedly built-in. \n\nHere's the error:\n`TypeError: Object of type datetime is not JSON serializable`\n\nThis happens when I return a dict containing a `datetime.now()` from a view. I'm using the default provider. Why isn't the `default` encoder handling it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d91497879b78c3d0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:4687e44e5ed2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a471ac7-7de9-4fda-924a-480251f6a876"}}
{"id": "d9a5cb7a95724ff1", "prompt": "Could you draft a new section for README.md that explains how to use Blueprints for organizing larger applications? Use a simple code example similar to the one already in the file.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure the example uses `src/flask/blueprints.py` logic as a reference for how it's implemented internally."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d9a5cb7a95724ff1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:d5e392939078", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "249aa84e-20b7-44bb-8595-3be989d750f6"}}
{"id": "7cf873c177516720", "prompt": "What's the latest stable version of `Werkzeug` compatible with Flask 2.2.x? I see the docs mention strict version pinning but I can't find a compatibility matrix table on the Werkzeug homepage.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7cf873c177516720", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:54ea13c88757", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfafd547-99eb-43e2-875e-9e0b448cca61"}}
{"id": "f9ec1c4d8a981465", "prompt": "Ich bekomme diesen Fehler beim Hochladen einer Datei mit Flask:\n\n```\nTypeError: expected string or bytes-like object, got 'NoneType'\n```\n\nDas passiert in `flask/helpers.py` in der Funktion `secure_filename`. Meine Datei hat einen Unicode-Namen. Hier der Code-Auszug:\n\n```python\nfile = request.files['file']\nfilename = secure_filename(file.filename)\n```\n\nKannst du prüfen, ob das ein bekanntes Problem ist oder ob ich etwas falsch mache? Ich denke, `file.filename` könnte None sein, wenn der Browser keine Datei sendet, aber hier wird eine gesendet. Es sieht aus wie ein Bug in der Verarbeitung von Unicode-Dateinamen in älteren Werkzeug-Versionen, aber wir nutzen die neuesten.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f9ec1c4d8a981465", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:2414fcd90f08", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e041be6-d1e8-470a-8264-43202ffc474c"}}
{"id": "621a19f08c67b32e", "prompt": "Run the linter on src/flask/app.py. I made some changes to the route handling logic and want to make sure I didn't introduce any style issues or type errors before I commit.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "621a19f08c67b32e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:61f9074bed9d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e92b758-9fc2-4655-ba56-2df3cafb6667"}}
{"id": "8ab08b160bc3a10e", "prompt": "I need to normalize the way we handle template loading across the codebase. Currently, `src/flask/templating.py`, `src/flask/sansio/scaffold.py` (for blueprints), and `src/flask/app.py` all have slightly different checks for whether a template exists before rendering.\n\nPlease standardize this into a single utility in `src/flask/helpers.py` and replace all direct calls to template existence checks in those three files with the new utility.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Done. Now, `src/flask/testing.py` also has a small snippet that does this. Please update that as well."}, {"prompt": "Please run `pytest tests/test_templating.py` to ensure the rendering behavior hasn't changed."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8ab08b160bc3a10e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:ea8cffd004bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12b5ff50-ab31-45d9-b4ca-1cdedf503371"}}
{"id": "9ce76dfa5f14c86c", "prompt": "I need to benchmark the json provider changes. Can you run the bench suite if it exists, or write a quick script to profile `src/flask/json/provider.py` against the latest commit hash?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9ce76dfa5f14c86c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:a00730097187", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c96357f2-e3d1-4fbe-a3ea-9909865999ca"}}
{"id": "ea8fa8bfdaea9a97", "prompt": "I'm setting up a new Flask project and want to use the latest stable release. Can you check PyPI for the current version of Flask? Also, please visit the official Flask documentation site (https://flask.palletsprojects.com/) and confirm if the 'Getting Started' guide mentioned in the README still matches that version, or if there are any deprecation warnings on the front page.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ea8fa8bfdaea9a97", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:3b1df0641512", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c1033d6-d289-42e9-aa37-87e360a86dd0"}}
{"id": "4b7f41feb98d0971", "prompt": "I'm getting a deprecation warning: \"Using the `redirect` function without an explicit `Response` class is deprecated.\" It's coming from `src/flask/helpers.py`. I just want a simple redirect to `/login`. \n\nHere is my code in `src/flask/views.py`:\n```python\nfrom flask import redirect\n\ndef login_required(view):\n    def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):\n        if not session.get('user'):\n            return redirect('/login')\n        return view(*args, **kwargs)\n    return wrapper\n```\n\nWhy is this triggering a warning? I thought `redirect` handled this automatically in newer Flask versions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4b7f41feb98d0971", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:3a84fef98082", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f14cbc17-99f0-46c4-9078-57cdc45725b1"}}
{"id": "6659edccf93aab6a", "prompt": "Explícame el flujo de ejecución en `src/flask/ctx.py`. ¿Cómo se gestiona el contexto de la aplicación y de la petición?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6659edccf93aab6a", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:658e93e20276", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ed44ff1-e272-45f2-9562-ef1585546693"}}
{"id": "dfdf22a9be5de2d7", "prompt": "I see src/flask/json/provider.py. Does Flask's built-in JSON serialization handle datetime objects by default, or do I need to register a custom encoder?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dfdf22a9be5de2d7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:dc6d807118d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6fe060d-9396-4468-a378-7845b795a9a3"}}
{"id": "ea012fc2aa56cc92", "prompt": "I'm looking at src/flask/testing.py and the TestClient class. The Werkzeug documentation mentions changes to how headers are handled in the latest 3.0 release. Can you pull up the Werkzeug migration guide or release notes to confirm if the `headers` parameter in `wsgi_client` has changed its type requirements? I'm getting a weird type hint error.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ea012fc2aa56cc92", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:332ee1e0ccad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f382b456-e7b6-4f07-9b3f-9b9dd4ce14e7"}}
{"id": "2eff821c8f1ac8d7", "prompt": "Please update the error handling in the following files to use a consistent `raise ... from exc` pattern for chained exceptions:\n\n- `src/flask/testing.py`\n- `src/flask/cli.py`\n- `tests/test_cli.py`\n\nCurrently, several places just `raise` the original exception without preserving the traceback chain. Fix these instances to improve debugging capabilities when these errors bubble up.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2eff821c8f1ac8d7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:e362da6caee5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1987192e-d731-45eb-b0cf-e16e944c9f47"}}
{"id": "3073585ccb6c3a37", "prompt": "Check the status page at https://status.github.com and let me know if GitHub had any incidents in the last hour. My CI pipeline is failing with intermittent 503s when trying to fetch packages, and I need to know if it's their fault or ours.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did they mention anything about rate limiting changes?"}, {"prompt": "Is the API service currently marked as 'Degraded Performance'?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3073585ccb6c3a37", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:e91452a54d50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99ff3d7c-1c38-4f16-b940-3ddf204d188d"}}
{"id": "37f99ca293e48fa9", "prompt": "I just realized we need to bump the version number for the next release. Can you update it in src/flask/__init__.py and pyproject.toml? Let's go with 3.1.0.dev0.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "37f99ca293e48fa9", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:3944e5d8a182", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "911771af-deb5-469c-9a5d-8364a8cefdd3"}}
{"id": "9b48ef0a858a4eef", "prompt": "Update the test suite to include a new test case for `test_input_validation` in `tests/test_basic.py` that checks for null bytes. Once that's done, commit it with a proper message.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, wait. Before you commit, can you check `git blame` on that file to make sure I'm not overwriting someone's recent fix?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b48ef0a858a4eef", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:e832b3a0785c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dce2ec66-f795-4c32-944b-8011094b6976"}}
{"id": "3a6ae850e79cec5d", "prompt": "In src/flask/cli.py, we use the click library for CLI commands. Can you check the official Click documentation for the `@click.option` decorator to see if there's a built-in way to handle boolean flags that default to false but also allow a 'no-' prefix (like --no-server)? I want to make sure we're using the standard pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3a6ae850e79cec5d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:1e0c184c21d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "10c733da-3182-4bef-8c36-b7bbcb657bac"}}
{"id": "c7d713e89f1822a8", "prompt": "Find all usages of `g` in the main flask source files (excluding tests). I'm trying to understand the scope and lifecycle of the application request globals.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does `g` interact with `@app.before_request`?"}, {"prompt": "Is there a public API docs link I missed?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c7d713e89f1822a8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:feb1ad218b0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b58fa49f-1715-4880-8f8c-837459e0aeac"}}
{"id": "cad49b69bd87a675", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of duplicated logic in `src/flask/app.py` and `src/flask/blueprints.py` regarding application registration and URL routing. Specifically, both classes handle iterating over extensions and registering blueprints with similar loops.\n\nCan you refactor this into a shared helper or base class method in `src/flask/sansio/scaffold.py` to keep the code DRY? I want to ensure that any future changes to the registration logic only need to happen in one place.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cad49b69bd87a675", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:fdb317f2bba8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0211fba9-451b-4e32-964f-7d45a8343b2f"}}
{"id": "2050717d0f0a362f", "prompt": "Fix the inconsistent quoting style in the CLI output strings in `src/flask/cli.py`. Some messages use single quotes, some double. I want everything using double quotes for consistency with the rest of the codebase standards.\n\nAlso, scan `tests/test_cli.py` and update any string literals there that might be affected or that are comparing against those output strings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2050717d0f0a362f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:dccf3c1b512d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd3da9a7-c225-47f4-914a-287d95d07db9"}}
{"id": "51ece9226babaeec", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when running the test suite. Can you run `pytest tests/test_basic.py` and tell me what's failing? I suspect it might be related to the new app.request_context changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "51ece9226babaeec", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:5ba79aeee301", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e7add852-5012-4be3-af0a-84aabcdd5bc1"}}
{"id": "bf6dd6b40672bd31", "prompt": "I need to bump the version for the next release. Look at pyproject.toml and CHANGES.rst. Bump the version number in pyproject.toml to 3.1.0 and add a placeholder entry in CHANGES.rst for version 3.1.0 under the unreleased section. Keep it simple.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, verify that the version string is correctly exported in src/flask/__init__.py if possible."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf6dd6b40672bd31", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:d16495207b83", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9daf14b0-ebb7-45de-8e82-9b907797edf8"}}
{"id": "cfcbe853303a0c28", "prompt": "I need to clean up some technical debt across the core framework and the examples. Please handle the following: 1) Audit `src/flask/helpers.py` and `src/flask/wrappers.py` to ensure we aren't using any deprecated Werkzeug utilities. 2) Update the Celery example in `examples/celery/` to use the latest `pyproject.toml` standards. 3) Review `tests/test_blueprints.py` and see if we can consolidate the setup logic with the logic used in `tests/test_apps/blueprintapp`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cfcbe853303a0c28", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "flask:e593080519ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0eb76c3a-fd4e-4a4e-b208-bb8f12bcd08b"}}
{"id": "e955786e6c72a18d", "prompt": "Hey, kurze Frage zu `flask/testing.py`. Ich nutze `FlaskClient` in meinen Tests. Wenn ich einen Request mit `client.get('/test')` starte und die Antwort einen Statuscode 500 hat, bekomme ich im Test keine Details darüber, warum der Server 500 zurückgegeben hat (außer im Log). Ist das beabsichtigt? Ich würde gerne in der Exception Details sehen. Ich habe gesehen, dass `full_stack=True` in der Config hilft, aber gibt es eine einfachere Möglichkeit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e955786e6c72a18d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:97ce185df89e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "454e53e0-40da-4290-82c9-9465cc88bc69"}}
{"id": "33428a9d883e8e62", "prompt": "Please start the flask server in the background for the tutorial app in examples/tutorial. I need to hit the /auth/register endpoint to test my frontend integration.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "33428a9d883e8e62", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:905d265c942e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26752795-38a4-43b1-bd78-8a8175ced45c"}}
{"id": "110a18a6a8236cb3", "prompt": "I'm trying to use async views in `src/flask/views.py`. When I define an async `dispatch_request` in a `MethodView` subclass, Flask raises a `RuntimeError: async def functions are not supported in synchronous mode`. \n\nBut I enabled async support in my app config. Is `MethodView` not fully async-aware in `src/flask/views.py`? I've seen async functions work fine with `@app.route`, but not with `MethodView`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `src/flask/app.py` to see how it wraps dispatch requests for `MethodView`."}, {"prompt": "Ensure `src/flask/views.py` properly awaits the dispatch method if it's a coroutine."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "110a18a6a8236cb3", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:eccde9758c10", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ae008a3-f824-4c9c-95e6-14b29f344812"}}
{"id": "e2f82310d6e1bf04", "prompt": "I'm looking at the migration guide for Flask 3.0 here: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0/changes/\n\nIt mentions something about 'Simplified Error Handling'. In `src/flask/app.py` and `src/flask/blueprints.py`, I see we register error handlers. Does the new API completely remove the need for `@app.errorhandler` or does it just change the signature? I'm trying to migrate `tests/test_user_error_handler.py` but I'm not sure if my custom error handlers will still work with the current Werkzeug version.\n\nSpecifically, does the `werkzeug.exceptions.HTTPException` handling still require catching `InternalServerError` explicitly or is that gone?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e2f82310d6e1bf04", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:ae41018c7fdd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59953fa6-9eaa-4b1c-92d2-a5df25e8f2a6"}}
{"id": "502595775abf1fbf", "prompt": "Hey, the CI is failing on the linting stage again. Can you run the pre-commit hooks on the entire repo and let me know what it complains about? I'm specifically worried about the recent changes in src/flask/app.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "502595775abf1fbf", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:e2824553928e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "270a0123-c7e6-443f-869d-56319e65970e"}}
{"id": "1daa2aedaa4cd36f", "prompt": "I need to prepare the release notes for the next version. Based on the recent commits, can you summarize the key changes, specifically focusing on the IPv6 fixes and the new `app.query` route decorator?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1daa2aedaa4cd36f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:eb8e0b47ddfa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29e9aca9-7f4c-4442-b513-a64a812cff63"}}
{"id": "b51100879ecbb9ef", "prompt": "Find the commit that introduced the `app.query` route decorator.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b51100879ecbb9ef", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:15c976b7f679", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8a39243-82be-43e5-ac80-2254c9d7c827"}}
{"id": "989d1b17d98ac98b", "prompt": "I need a screenshot of our production dashboard at https://admin.internal.company.com/login to verify if the new CSS deployment went through correctly. The devs on Slack are claiming it's broken but I can't login right now. Can you capture it via a headless browser?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "989d1b17d98ac98b", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:4ec5715e798c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a49407ba-68d9-4f37-8744-0876ae39f70d"}}
{"id": "c3512312984b7967", "prompt": "We're seeing a lot of `try/except` blocks in `src/flask/views.py` and `src/flask/blueprints.py` that catch `AttributeError` when accessing view methods. This is fragile.\n\nRefactor the view lookup logic in both files to use `getattr` with a default or check for `hasattr` more explicitly before invoking the view function. The goal is to avoid silent failures or obscure stack traces when a method isn't found.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c3512312984b7967", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:ca6bc16ce4da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6d5e712-165f-4672-9f57-16b97cf0909d"}}
{"id": "7fcf237d433fdcc7", "prompt": "Please extract the content of `tests/static/index.html` and `tests/static/config.json`. I need to manually verify some content types for a bug report. Also, check if there are any other HTML or JSON files in the `tests/static/` directory and list their names. I need to make sure I'm not missing a specific test asset.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7fcf237d433fdcc7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:62eec94e9a98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c1b745ae-8566-46ed-a3b0-e56802060bbc"}}
{"id": "b9b7b159fb09ac5c", "prompt": "Where is the test for `Flask.register_blueprint` located? I'm fixing a bug related to static folders in blueprints.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b9b7b159fb09ac5c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:3155527d6d46", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70b233e1-c530-4660-858a-5705688c5c51"}}
{"id": "d31ddd97958bb40e", "prompt": "I'm reviewing the security implications of the new `app.query` route decorator added in the recent commits. It's in `src/flask/app.py`. Can you review how `query` parameters are passed through to the view functions? I'm worried about SQL injection vectors if a developer uses this with raw DB queries without parameters. Please check the typing in `src/flask/typing.py` too.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d31ddd97958bb40e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:55e2a188b7a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8900505b-90a2-48e4-9138-72655fd8f937"}}
{"id": "cd81888536d3b9ee", "prompt": "Delete the `examples/javascript/js_example/templates/jquery.html` file as it's no longer needed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cd81888536d3b9ee", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:34abbc86fc4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23d6152d-86e4-4035-a67e-a58734d5b9fb"}}
{"id": "5739395c1e55b727", "prompt": "Update the documentation in `src/flask/sansio/README.md` to clarify what 'sansio' stands for and why we use it compared to the standard implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5739395c1e55b727", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:993e3649a820", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11697391-d8df-43c6-a9f8-b08e429573c6"}}
{"id": "68037b5034d8d42c", "prompt": "I'm getting a crash when running my Flask app with an IPv6 address in the host config.\n\nHere's the traceback:\n\n  File \"/home/user/flask/src/flask/cli.py\", line 120, in run_command\n    host = server_name.partition(\":\")[0]\n  File \"/usr/lib/python3.10/ipaddress.py\", line 171, in __init__\n    raise ValueError(f\"Invalid IPv6 address: {a!r}\")\n\nLooks like `server_name.partition(\":\")` is splitting the IPv6 literal `::1:5000` incorrectly because IPv6 addresses contain colons too. Can you fix the logic in `cli.py` to handle this?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you make sure the tests in test_cli.py cover this IPv6 case?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "68037b5034d8d42c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:d052aa0cf4e2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e073dff-47d5-42ef-9d2a-e9f64879b0db"}}
{"id": "344944952fa14a2d", "prompt": "I need to trace where the `flask` CLI command is actually registered. Can you find the entry point and the function that handles the `run` command?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "344944952fa14a2d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:97d51989d732", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19944015-96b9-43d8-93a9-c93529df9d9c"}}
{"id": "3fbe9634d89a232d", "prompt": "I just saw the CVE-2023-xxxx advisory for Flask regarding request headers parsing. Can you audit `src/flask/helpers.py` and `src/flask/wrappers.py` specifically looking for how we handle `Host` and `X-Forwarded-Host` headers? I need to know if we're vulnerable to host header injection in the current codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3fbe9634d89a232d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:f79d6c928939", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "539bf477-faf8-4538-bf6d-cb04abbe8ae2"}}
{"id": "8bc57aa1215e8411", "prompt": "Necesito entender los tests de la CLI. ¿Podrías explicarme qué se está probando en `tests/test_cli.py`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8bc57aa1215e8411", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:3a3310314b90", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5734dba-0720-4701-a3c6-69d0493785db"}}
{"id": "fba3649611354d17", "prompt": "I need to standardize how configuration is loaded across the app.\n\nCurrently, `src/flask/cli.py` reads `.flaskenv` directly, and `src/flask/config.py` handles `.env` via a different path. Also, `tests/test_config.py` is testing these separately.\n\nI want to unify this into the `Config` class in `src/flask/config.py`. Can you rewrite the logic so that `load_dotenv` is called consistently from one place, and all CLI commands use the `Flask` app's config loader for environment variables?\n\nI know this touches `src/flask/__init__.py` for the global `app` instance. Please ensure `examples/tutorial/flaskr/__init__.py` doesn't break.\n\nIf you see any circular import risks, let me know before running changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fba3649611354d17", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:d750f0ddbc22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd4b18a9-0eae-4032-b9c9-64f428045873"}}
{"id": "e06b7f4634464614", "prompt": "我想在 src/flask/app.py 里加个新特性，先确认一下现有的请求上下文测试有没有挂。跑 tests/test_reqctx.py，如果有任何失败赶紧告诉我，我要改代码了。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e06b7f4634464614", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:5aba34fd8682", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d4a8481-69c1-46e6-af7d-b0d563fd53f1"}}
{"id": "546e23ef41f3ec6a", "prompt": "Looking at examples/celery/src/task_app/tasks.py, how does the Celery worker communicate with the Flask app context? Does the task execute inside a request context automatically?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "546e23ef41f3ec6a", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:e7d96f30b66b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0afc4b5-c428-4e56-b14b-157f910fbcf9"}}
{"id": "6205b1b11e8327d1", "prompt": "Hey, we ran a SAST scan on the repo and it flagged `src/flask/json/provider.py` and `tests/test_json.py` as having potential information disclosure issues. Can you look at these files? The report says we might be leaking internal config or sensitive environment variables through the JSON response provider.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is this a false positive or do we need to implement an allowlist for JSON serialization?"}, {"prompt": "Check `src/flask/config.py` to see how config keys are exposed."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6205b1b11e8327d1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:cf50b2b18f55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ccfe4df-8b17-4bd8-ba4c-c7e83e9d3dc8"}}
{"id": "be0c5a94f0f5d644", "prompt": "In `src/flask/sessions.py`, the `SecureCookieSessionInterface` creates a session object. When `use_signer=True` and `samesite` is set, the cookie isn't being set with the `SameSite` attribute in newer requests.\n\nI've been using Flask 2.2+ and I see the cookie is being sent without samesite in some edge cases with `Response` objects created via `make_response`.\n\nCan you check if the session data is actually being serialized correctly with the samesite policy in `src/flask/sessions.py`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "be0c5a94f0f5d644", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:c7ad9956bb47", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e56ae7bc-1658-433e-9892-114d46305ca0"}}
{"id": "f2baf8cb84b8ba3b", "prompt": "who changed the IPv6 server name parsing in the recent commits?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "what was the specific fix implemented there?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f2baf8cb84b8ba3b", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:6d8fac3f6c23", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ea37daa-85d5-4d36-b2b5-684141d33b33"}}
{"id": "27b89f1063a1f524", "prompt": "I need to update the version in `pyproject.toml` for the next release. Can you find the current version number defined there? Also, check `CHANGES.rst` to see if the most recent entry matches the recent commits I pasted above (like the IPv6 fix). If the changelog is out of sync, let me know which commit is missing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "27b89f1063a1f524", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:93ffa510a437", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "576c81bb-30e1-4603-a020-6d39289d0a5b"}}
{"id": "abd07c1efc683e2a", "prompt": "Check the git blame for src/flask/sansio/app.py line 142. I want to know who wrote the default exception handling logic and why it was added.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Create an issue summarizing the finding."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "abd07c1efc683e2a", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:00c26038679d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b653b01-5432-4d56-bb67-aedf2bd9551a"}}
{"id": "b08789fe4180d038", "prompt": "I've been experimenting with some changes in `src/flask/views.py` but they aren't ready for a PR. Stash my current work so I have a clean working directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b08789fe4180d038", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:b0f66890b183", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7a26a68-637e-4b00-85af-f45ef8678fb5"}}
{"id": "d71b1b9d840366ca", "prompt": "What is the recommended way to configure `SECRET_KEY` in production according to the Flask security guidelines? I see we have some hardcoded keys in the examples and tests. I want to make sure I'm following best practices before we refactor src/flask/config.py and the tutorial examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d71b1b9d840366ca", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:caaafa2fd10d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84bb8214-45fe-4f3b-b52c-141a96d374a4"}}
{"id": "c11ce5dd60dadea1", "prompt": "show me the diff between 8999295 and d8eaaba", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c11ce5dd60dadea1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:78e187454992", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f81a8a88-c5f9-4b61-927c-87e673232855"}}
{"id": "429fc0e70d9d7480", "prompt": "The CLI app in examples/celery/src/task_app/tasks.py is throwing an ImportError on import. It can't find flask. I have flask installed in the venv. Can you check if the `make_celery.py` setup is missing any imports?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "429fc0e70d9d7480", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:ec7f04c5889f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "782e6321-cf85-43ed-9fe1-986bfdfb25fe"}}
{"id": "a652be217060102e", "prompt": "Show me all places where `src/flask/globals.py` variables are accessed. Specifically looking for `g` and `session` usage in views.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a652be217060102e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:2052fcfee46f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "082904bf-14ea-4071-b4cd-4e07dc97426c"}}
{"id": "defd0581eef5e7d0", "prompt": "Can you check the Jinja2 docs on their official site regarding 'autoescaping'? I want to understand exactly how `select_autoescape` works with different file extensions. I'm trying to fix a bug in src/flask/templating.py where CSS files aren't being escaped correctly in some nested layouts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "defd0581eef5e7d0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:a0cab9982c5e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ab9df0d2-6ac7-463c-8038-5506144e7f44"}}
{"id": "ba5546123143ec95", "prompt": "Can you refactor `src/flask/app.py` to move the `register_error_handler` logic into a separate private method? I want to clean up the `__init__` method.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ba5546123143ec95", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:d43a8be8c885", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b6e2443-ec52-4d5d-8534-a2aee4781f96"}}
{"id": "76e89f0f63cfe876", "prompt": "Remove `examples/javascript/LICENSE.txt` since we don't need duplicate license files in the examples directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "76e89f0f63cfe876", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:5ed4ebb96a58", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ed095c33-bf54-4f82-9825-d83fc137a2ae"}}
{"id": "fb034d62ec4d87cf", "prompt": "In ``src/flask/helpers.py``, I see ``get_root_path``. It's used by ``Flask.__init__``. What exactly does it return for a standard package structure versus an editable install? I'm seeing some weird behavior with static file loading.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb034d62ec4d87cf", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:aabc11a4ea57", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c82c605-3569-47f6-8a20-920271496db4"}}
{"id": "973af2fb2348c1a4", "prompt": "I messed up the last few changes in `src/flask/config.py`. Revert the last commit.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "973af2fb2348c1a4", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:e2961f40ff10", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "575012ec-a480-488c-a6bd-3e1422d58933"}}
{"id": "df5e8c3685cd1b73", "prompt": "I want to jump into an interactive python shell with the Flask app context pre-loaded. Can you help me set that up?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df5e8c3685cd1b73", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:fe1ce85e6fc4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92bf8144-2d79-406f-96bd-0286248a24a1"}}
{"id": "6bf596d75316f374", "prompt": "Update the docstring in `src/flask/app.py` to clarify how the application context works, and then commit the change with a descriptive message.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you split this into a new branch called 'docs/app-context' before committing?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6bf596d75316f374", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:df63cc4b2f92", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d14ed5a-5389-4b9f-844b-c1809b3672d7"}}
{"id": "a7bba1cb263a222c", "prompt": "Open a terminal session in the devcontainer so I can manually run the setup scripts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7bba1cb263a222c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:e5c3899be38f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65a862ed-0021-4473-92ac-f2e98aaa012b"}}
{"id": "314f755bff3041ea", "prompt": "Can you check if `flask-mongoengine` is still compatible with our current setup? I see a recent commit 'update flask-mongoengine link' in the history and want to make sure we aren't using a broken or deprecated version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "314f755bff3041ea", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "flask:8992c0e48c87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e0418ad-6e95-466b-bb0a-75029b342a31"}}
{"id": "0b4533e91a8f6157", "prompt": "帮我启动开发服务器，我需要在本地调试一下路由注册逻辑。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b4533e91a8f6157", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:66c28da894f5", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6631f769-a09f-4970-9fb2-0d4faddf67aa"}}
{"id": "625087eb8e66ed78", "prompt": "I have a weird error: `TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'on_complete'` when running the celery worker. It seems related to the `Flask-Celery` integration. Is there a migration guide for updating Flask to support the new Celery signal interface?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "625087eb8e66ed78", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:b82eeac101c6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7bd85b47-071e-4547-bb64-73ff3f78c27c"}}
{"id": "8c283c6be01298bc", "prompt": "The `Blueprint` registration is failing in `src/flask/blueprints.py`. I have a blueprint in `examples/tutorial/flaskr/blog.py` and I'm registering it in `__init__.py`. When I try to run `flask run`, I get:\n\n```\nAttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'url_rule_class'\n```\n\nStack trace:\n```\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"src/flask/cli.py\", line 200, in main\n    app = ctx.make_app()\n  File \"src/flask/cli.py\", line 165, in make_app\n    app = factory()\n  File \"examples/tutorial/flaskr/__init__.py\", line 15, in create_app\n    app.register_blueprint(blog.bp, url_prefix='/blog')\n  File \"src/flask/app.py\", line 1124, in register_blueprint\n    blueprint.register()\n  File \"src/flask/blueprints.py\", line 410, in register\n    if not app.url_rule_class:\n```\n\nIt seems `app.url_rule_class` is None. Is this a configuration issue or a bug in `register_blueprint`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8c283c6be01298bc", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:7037e455b034", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "041274e9-0536-4be0-bb3a-55229f1da86e"}}
{"id": "6929e04453bf028f", "prompt": "I noticed we are using `uv.lock`. Run a check to see if our existing test suite passes with the current lockfile, then tell me if there are any outdated packages we should audit for security vulnerabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6929e04453bf028f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "flask:25a8528a4855", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92d07592-9e15-4729-97de-9079462b71b5"}}
{"id": "acd34e7ddc0a2865", "prompt": "can you show me the commit that introduced the app.query route decorator?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "acd34e7ddc0a2865", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:98d3cb3ffe7f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5af378c3-0443-4993-985e-b1147c024a1b"}}
{"id": "b63f71c5a9223e52", "prompt": "I realized I made a typo in the previous commit message. Can you amend the last commit to fix the wording?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b63f71c5a9223e52", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:b8db208aa37c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d897721-fbf5-4136-98b3-50cd34f29d74"}}
{"id": "3c958f1c9f7f860c", "prompt": "We have a vulnerability report about unrestricted file uploads in the static file serving. Please scan `src/flask/helpers.py` and specifically the `send_from_directory` function. Also check `src/flask/testing.py` since our test client might be bypassing some path traversal checks. I found a PoC where I can `../` out of the static directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3c958f1c9f7f860c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:5e434b80786f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b223ae1-fb40-4df4-98c6-da729c864503"}}
{"id": "79ec6f2ddecc566f", "prompt": "We're planning to drop support for Python 3.8 soon. Can you check the latest PyPI page for Flask to see what the current version is and if there are any notes about dropped Python versions? I need to update the classifier in pyproject.toml correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "79ec6f2ddecc566f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:c8523781f914", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2fe03efd-08fc-421a-bc23-5b09a56cb35a"}}
{"id": "dece037b05ee47bd", "prompt": "Where is the default secret key handling logic? I see some code in src/flask/config.py but I'm not sure if that's the only place it's checked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dece037b05ee47bd", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:7df7e95b4e02", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f27b61d9-a30a-4a86-b1d1-b08ff599a69f"}}
{"id": "a50a2ee84bd09a37", "prompt": "Estoy teniendo problemas con el tipado. ¿Qué hace exactamente el tipo `Any` en `src/flask/typing.py` o cómo se integra con el resto de la app?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Hay algún ejemplo en los tests de cómo usar correctamente esos tipos para evitar errores de linting?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a50a2ee84bd09a37", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:76efa629a17b", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "71d95c1a-5ff3-4682-a27c-4eaa9353143c"}}
{"id": "4c45eb9d01b9a98d", "prompt": "Please hit the public endpoint https://httpbin.org/post with a POST request containing JSON payload {\"status\": \"ok\"} and tell me exactly what it returns in the JSON response. I'm debugging a webhook integration and want to ensure my Flask view is serializing the data correctly before it gets echoed back.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c45eb9d01b9a98d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:ac7ed94e40d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8cae58b-f453-47bf-b9f8-b5cba6a54e97"}}
{"id": "baf140732e34e2ff", "prompt": "Hi, ich habe ein Problem mit Flask 3.x. Wenn ich eine App mit `app = Flask(__name__, instance_relative_config=True)` erstelle und dann auf `app.config` zugreife, während die Instanz-Verzeichnis-Struktur fehlt, crasht die Anwendung mit einem FileNotFoundError. Das ist in der Dokumentation so angegeben, aber ich dachte, Flask würde das selbst handhaben? Hier ist der Stacktrace:\n\n```python\nFileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/test_instance'\n```\n\nKannst du das in `flask/app.py` fixen, sodass es graceful degraded oder zumindest besser dokumentiert ist?\"", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "baf140732e34e2ff", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:5f23c784fdca", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d41c5b0-9166-44c4-bd2d-16d35a502915"}}
{"id": "2d5dab36ebcab8ed", "prompt": "Where is the `Flask` class defined? I need to trace the initialization logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2d5dab36ebcab8ed", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:ceb995727c18", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f01fc26-c5aa-4246-9c47-39c962615d0c"}}
{"id": "956ed4b838076df2", "prompt": "In test_blueprints.py, there's a test checking route priority. How does Flask determine route precedence between a static route and a dynamic route with converters?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "956ed4b838076df2", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:7e3a20007c74", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d4fc4c2-eb48-4aba-b1d8-a1607dcbac6d"}}
{"id": "e72337cb30101c41", "prompt": "Can you create a high-level architectural diagram in Mermaid format for the README? I want to show the relationship between the Flask core, Werkzeug, and Jinja as described in the intro.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e72337cb30101c41", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:16390e76c9ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4204bb2-0158-4419-a450-ef786d5e001b"}}
{"id": "09a03ccdea1cb948", "prompt": "Hey, I'm hitting a wall with the Celery example app. Specifically `examples/celery/src/task_app/tasks.py`. The task decorator isn't accepting the arguments I think it should based on the Flask-Celery extension docs. Can you check the latest Flask-Celery extension documentation to see if there are any breaking changes in how task options like `bind` or `expires` are handled when used with Flask's app context?\n\nThe error I'm seeing is something about 'Task objects must inherit from a specific base'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the correct import and decorator syntax for defining the tasks now?"}, {"prompt": "Also, verify if the `create_celery_app` function in `make_celery.py` needs any updates for the new version."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "09a03ccdea1cb948", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:766e64441513", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b22ec12a-9593-4efd-a55e-edafa5643c56"}}
{"id": "3752a62b0c30e1bc", "prompt": "Avvia il server di sviluppo per `examples/javascript` in background e tieni monitorato il log. Ho notato che a volte fa panic le richieste concorrenti sui template Fetch. Voglio vedere se riesco a replicarlo.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ho inviato una POST a `/fetch` e il processo sembra morto. Controlla l'output dello standard error per capire perché è crashato."}, {"prompt": "Sembra un problema di race condition nel global state. Puoi verificare se `flask.ctx` sta causando conflitti?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3752a62b0c30e1bc", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:a45babca3f18", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d6982b2-0c4e-4a48-b1d2-423703830675"}}
{"id": "924885d46b38721e", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` parameter to the `Flask` constructor in `src/flask/app.py` and make sure it's stored in the app config.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me how to update the tests to verify this parameter is being set correctly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "924885d46b38721e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:05ff06ebbb67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99edb6f8-9ea2-4b64-bae9-98b21a6ee334"}}
{"id": "19fda09832f46e84", "prompt": "Where is `app.config` populated from environment variables?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the config loading logic in `src/flask/config.py`"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "19fda09832f46e84", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:690102966a9b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "94fe1ab7-eecd-4dfb-ab0c-836e36d8915b"}}
{"id": "255480671a8a85d0", "prompt": "I'm getting `RuntimeError: working outside of application context` in my unit tests when I try to access `current_app`. The Flask docs say I need to push a context, but I'm using `with app.test_client()` and still hitting this in a helper function. Can you explain how the test client context works in the docs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "255480671a8a85d0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:fd83618d2de4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b71d1d67-a0bb-4934-8aab-c5b746de0f57"}}
{"id": "3c4cd5cc9b4df14a", "prompt": "In `src/flask/config.py`, I see support for TOML, JSON, and Python files. How does Flask determine which loader to use when I call `app.config.from_object()` versus `app.config.from_pyfile()`? Is there a precedence order if I mix them?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does `from_envvar` override settings loaded from `from_pyfile`?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any security implications of using `from_pyfile` with untrusted input?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c4cd5cc9b4df14a", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:87205e31f7a6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bece3468-8e18-46cd-b73c-25e454af1ca4"}}
{"id": "8ec9e3acd0bbf989", "prompt": "I'm worried about the Jinja2 dependency. Can you scan the codebase for any usage of Jinja2 APIs that might be deprecated in the next major release? Specifically look at how we handle `src/flask/templating.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8ec9e3acd0bbf989", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "flask:0a3f6f6b9008", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e95f52f-229b-4216-ad3c-c51327b70378"}}
{"id": "6fb25f247c125f3c", "prompt": "How does the `Flask` class in `src/flask/app.py` handle the registration of blueprints? I want to understand the internal flow when `register_blueprint` is called.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me how it handles the `url_prefix` during registration?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6fb25f247c125f3c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:94956d3ad24d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86b98b59-e027-453f-87fa-edb40cd557e2"}}
{"id": "3be08b527290948f", "prompt": "Please run black on src/flask/ and tests/ to ensure consistent formatting.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3be08b527290948f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:1fcffe878466", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b571922-ccfe-430f-966b-009338340601"}}
{"id": "5e73ec94b4175831", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when trying to use the CLI in my test app. Can you look at tests/test_apps/cliapp/app.py and add a `timeout` parameter to the `run` method?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "also update the factory.py to support this new parameter"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5e73ec94b4175831", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:cffebcb32bd7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70ac4e3d-c966-4f8e-a283-ba433e890717"}}
{"id": "57b075d0e0908861", "prompt": "Is the Werkzeug CDN currently up? I need to verify if http://cdn.werkzeug.palletsprojects.com/releases/werkzeug-2.3.0.zip is accessible and returning a 200 OK. Our build process is timing out when trying to download dependencies from that URL.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What is the Content-Length of that ZIP file?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any redirect chains happening before the final 200?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "57b075d0e0908861", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:eccceaa7852f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "51af92e8-4df6-4a0a-834f-7d222568ede0"}}
{"id": "ff71847ba762cefc", "prompt": "I see in src/flask/blueprints.py that Blueprints allow for modular application design. Can you explain the lifecycle of a Blueprint registration versus a direct route on the app instance? Specifically, when does the route registration actually happen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ff71847ba762cefc", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:f49c06db680f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b35cd01-30cb-4e9e-bfc9-7b228d9b4ef4"}}
{"id": "d80b6a5a63e248d6", "prompt": "I'm getting a `RuntimeError: working outside of application context`. Can you point me to where that error message is raised in the codebase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d80b6a5a63e248d6", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:f1c60403efe8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec3b9060-a4d7-443c-9421-ec31b9ec6ba7"}}
{"id": "19b093dbef04deb8", "prompt": "In the Flask app context, what is the exact difference between `flask.g` and `app.config`? I'm trying to decide where to store request-scoped user data versus application-wide settings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "19b093dbef04deb8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:8cc31d24b87f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5b12e81-9fdf-4c5f-9d8f-93d8582bb00c"}}
{"id": "379c526c1c43a6dc", "prompt": "Refactor the error handling in `tests/test_blueprints.py` to be more concise, then create a new branch named `refactor-blueprint-tests` and commit it there.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now that it's committed, can you push this branch to origin?"}, {"prompt": "Wait, I actually wanted to include the changes from `tests/test_cli.py` in that same branch. Can you merge those changes in and amend the commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "379c526c1c43a6dc", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:e3c9f4f83d5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a791349-59c3-4b78-9ea8-48425583bfde"}}
{"id": "649ee9d3b47eb1b9", "prompt": "What is the purpose of the `sansio` directory in src/flask/sansio/? Why are some components like `app.py` and `blueprints.py` split into sansio vs the main flask module?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "649ee9d3b47eb1b9", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:c3b20a823bcf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a01fc1bc-1e64-4761-a17b-efbb45905004"}}
{"id": "1e2491b479b451e4", "prompt": "Can you look at the test configuration in `tests/conftest.py`? I want to understand the fixture setup for the app context. Specifically, are there any fixtures that load a specific JSON config file from `tests/static/`? If so, which ones?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `config.json` and `config.toml` in `tests/static/` have different content, and which one is preferred by default tests."}, {"prompt": "Verify if any tests are explicitly loading `.flaskenv` from `tests/test_apps/`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e2491b479b451e4", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:02f4ae58b108", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e9383e8-28e0-47d0-8e56-e56e17c39504"}}
{"id": "aa791c12d1e61aaf", "prompt": "The test suite seems to be hanging on `tests/test_blueprints.py`. Can you help me find what process is holding the lock or just kill any orphaned python processes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "aa791c12d1e61aaf", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:348c365ad1c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf2be7d4-f26f-42aa-bb7c-0d9992acd1d7"}}
{"id": "b0178785127d919e", "prompt": "Can you look at `tests/test_blueprints.py` and tell me what specific edge cases are being tested for blueprint registration?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b0178785127d919e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:216cd06c0c61", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0c5644a-d2dc-4e52-92b5-72654b091527"}}
{"id": "1fd9f469e53aa009", "prompt": "In src/flask/ctx.py, how is the `flask.g` object managed during a request context? Specifically, does it automatically close or clear its attributes, or do I need to handle cleanup manually?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the code in ctx.py that handles the teardown of the app context?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1fd9f469e53aa009", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:b48187c2e60b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db2c5483-beaf-4e6a-b767-f0e8bc19c049"}}
{"id": "5f6011efdcadf231", "prompt": "We need to document the new `app.query` decorator. Please add a technical explanation of how it works to the internal developer docs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5f6011efdcadf231", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "flask:b7252788c933", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f4c0c34-cd71-4fbf-93aa-17cbca2a46f1"}}
{"id": "87abe38e50a80c5e", "prompt": "find the function that handles the /static route", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "87abe38e50a80c5e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:83139808c066", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "27cb26c5-e09a-4ce8-acaa-acff1793ead3"}}
{"id": "db4133619eeaff47", "prompt": "Can you explain how the request context is managed in `src/flask/ctx.py`? I'm trying to understand how local proxies work here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db4133619eeaff47", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:7f52f95bec46", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0d91c75-36b0-48ce-927d-ed36c3d9d58e"}}
{"id": "9c8b4479050f70d7", "prompt": "I'm looking at the Flask architecture. Can you explain the difference between the ``Flask`` app class in ``src/flask/app.py`` and the ``sansio`` module? Why is ``sansio`` used if I only ever import from ``flask``?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9c8b4479050f70d7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:88da1bb15b2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22720a33-cb7b-4b43-9f53-4e5601b80b83"}}
{"id": "61f86ba13ab4c9ee", "prompt": "Triaging findings from a recent Secret Scan. The tool flagged these files as containing hardcoded secrets, but I'm pretty sure these are just test fixtures or example values. Can you verify `tests/test_apps/.env`, `tests/test_apps/.flaskenv`, and `examples/celery/src/task_app/tasks.py`? If they are secrets, I need to move them to proper vault handling immediately.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `examples/tutorial/flaskr/db.py` has any hardcoded credentials too."}, {"prompt": "Confirm if `.flaskenv` should be in `.gitignore` or if we need to exclude it from the scan."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "61f86ba13ab4c9ee", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:85257f9bfee5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "df926c40-99a2-4146-bc6d-bd0b1d92457b"}}
{"id": "0686a1d6aca63c36", "prompt": "I'm trying to audit our dependencies. Can you scan the root `pyproject.toml` and list all the dependencies under `[project.dependencies]` and `[project.optional-dependencies]`? I need to know if we are still using `itsdangerous` or if it's been moved to a dev-only requirement.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check the `uv.lock` file to see what the pinned version of itsdangerous is right now."}, {"prompt": "Double-check if `itsdangerous` appears in any of the example projects' requirements files."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0686a1d6aca63c36", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:778ee5b9b519", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2603ec44-5b45-4b1c-a142-c1fd8ca6605c"}}
{"id": "5bc2de273ee83762", "prompt": "The test suite is failing on my local machine and I suspect it's a config issue. Please look at tests/test_apps/.env and tests/test_apps/.flaskenv. Are there any hardcoded values I should be aware of that might interfere with environment variable overrides during testing? Specifically, check if FLASK_ENV or FLASK_DEBUG are set.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5bc2de273ee83762", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:64bce08579f6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83c321a2-9f28-4d52-a715-7ae02eccb2be"}}
{"id": "bf58cdd7911ef7aa", "prompt": "I'm getting a KeyError when accessing a missing configuration value. Can you update `src/flask/config.py` to provide a more descriptive error message like 'Configuration key \"{}\" is required but was not found'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf58cdd7911ef7aa", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:0bab881d1098", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d471fec-6530-49dc-8f0d-3e5d41472f34"}}
{"id": "acfbea0c3222f96d", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `src/flask/sessions.py`. Can you stash my current work so I have a clean working directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "acfbea0c3222f96d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:af7bc90a4f8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eecd9946-8010-4abc-87dc-bd246161af21"}}
{"id": "ca604254c674d2ba", "prompt": "Where is `app.add_url_rule` actually implemented? I see calls to it everywhere but I want to trace the logic in `src/flask/app.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ca604254c674d2ba", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:958d95c45806", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d57525ac-caa5-44f1-8aeb-1914286e9e50"}}
{"id": "8e028b83f3b0f498", "prompt": "I just realized I made a typo in the docstring of `src/flask/helpers.py` in my last commit. Can you amend the last commit with the fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8e028b83f3b0f498", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:571497bc2117", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebe17db8-7581-477a-a2bc-04c8a185c177"}}
{"id": "744b3df934ba7b97", "prompt": "I'm seeing inconsistent autoescaping behavior in templates. Where in the codebase is the `autoescape` selection logic implemented? Specifically, which files handle the case-insensitive comparison for template extensions mentioned in recent commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "744b3df934ba7b97", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:d0a9fc42c8af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f189631-73bd-4f0f-819f-81547369ef0c"}}
{"id": "9f9cab9b51b5e777", "prompt": "I'm seeing some type hints in `src/flask/typing.py`. Can you summarize the main custom types defined there?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9f9cab9b51b5e777", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:dab0937e48da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad391840-d278-4d75-998d-39e966bab6dd"}}
{"id": "568d7c3afb41a7b0", "prompt": "Where are the test cases for the CLI `run` command?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "568d7c3afb41a7b0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:16ced1251d23", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "566ff436-120e-4473-a0e8-431d51dee988"}}
{"id": "537947b902f2ad50", "prompt": "Ich versuche, Flask in einem Docker-Container zu starten (`flask run`), aber es startet nicht auf der richtigen IP. Es bindet nur an `127.0.0.1`, aber ich brauche `0.0.0.0`, damit externe Container darauf zugreifen können. In der CLI wird das ignorert. Ist das ein Bug in `flask/cli.py`? Die Dokumentation sagt, man kann `flask run --host 0.0.0.0` nutzen, aber das scheint in der aktuellen Version nicht zu greifen, da die Host-Config überschrieben wird. Bitte sieh dir `src/flask/cli.py` an, Zeile ~200 ff.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "537947b902f2ad50", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:11b13a988ba7", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3edc5263-606f-4202-87f9-47bd7c993940"}}
{"id": "3df0fccd7f13b059", "prompt": "I noticed that `template_filter` decorator in `src/flask/helpers.py` isn't exposing the filter name in `help()` output inside the Jinja2 environment correctly. \n\nActually, looking deeper, the issue is in `src/flask/sansio/scaffold.py` where `_filter_template_module` is called. When `name` is `None` (which is the default in the decorator), it defaults the filter name to the function name, but if the function is anonymous or decorated in a weird way, it might fail.\n\nCan you add a check to ensure the filter is correctly attached to the template context even if the wrapper messes up `__name__`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3df0fccd7f13b059", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:0220a49005e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fd639d1-f49a-4526-be59-618c27ac3670"}}
{"id": "4333fa98e361edb8", "prompt": "Could you explain the purpose and implementation of `src/flask/json/provider.py`? I'm specifically interested in how custom JSON encoders are integrated.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any specific type hints or protocols defined in `src/flask/typing.py` that these providers must adhere to?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4333fa98e361edb8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:a3de0501298f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98d9028e-c6b7-493f-8d92-df316cfe6b01"}}
{"id": "c37607010a44c27d", "prompt": "Check if there are any processes currently running on port 5000 so I can run the dev server without a bind error.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c37607010a44c27d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:c105d11dfa2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "73012c83-a591-45e1-8b1f-24810ff0ccd4"}}
{"id": "e09bccb403cbada7", "prompt": "Add a docstring to the `Flask` class in `src/flask/app.py` explaining that it is the central object for the application, and then commit this change to a new branch called `docs/app-class-docstring` with a descriptive message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e09bccb403cbada7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:737307f8a50f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7535410b-0774-4821-9041-133d2dacf221"}}
{"id": "81f37c56840b08f1", "prompt": "I'm setting up the CI for this project and need to know the exact set of dev dependencies. Can you parse pyproject.toml and extract the contents of the `[project.optional-dependencies]` section, specifically the `dev` group? I need a flat list of all package names and versions as they appear in the lockfile.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81f37c56840b08f1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:ca5df6c51c27", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "364a37c2-cf9c-4047-929b-aa489f55f157"}}
{"id": "48ff4dabf008753b", "prompt": "What changed in the repository between commit 8999295 and d318b68?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "48ff4dabf008753b", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:d3ce1a4f4318", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85164d3d-25ae-4023-9bda-0bf2d00c1066"}}
{"id": "63c506579b21c109", "prompt": "I messed up the implementation of the new route decorator in `src/flask/app.py`. Revert the last commit and let me know when the branch is back to HEAD.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "63c506579b21c109", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:45fe529110b1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e797794-2c65-4337-ae63-54895a4853de"}}
{"id": "43edae09c77514f3", "prompt": "I need to bump the version for the next release. Update pyproject.toml. Also, I noticed a lot of .pyc files cluttering up src/flask. Can you add a rule to .gitignore to stop these from being tracked? Just make sure you don't break existing ignores.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43edae09c77514f3", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:045be0fcf3a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3638726a-d8d2-4e85-8e81-fef89a93684a"}}
{"id": "56423ad414b0acf5", "prompt": "I'm looking at `tests/test_blueprints.py`. Based on the test cases there, what are the main edge cases covered when testing blueprint-specific routes vs global routes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "56423ad414b0acf5", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:bd3815801121", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f84d6693-a27d-468c-b8f9-3f9af838ccdd"}}
{"id": "a85a6168615f8f62", "prompt": "Kannst du bitte `src/flask/blueprints.py` anschauen? Die Funktion `Blueprint.route` scheint den `methods`-Parameter nicht korrekt zu verarbeiten, wenn er eine Liste mit nur einem Element ist. Es wird versucht, `methods` zu iterieren, aber wenn es nur eine Methode ist (z.B. `['POST']`), funktioniert es, aber wenn ich `methods='POST'` (String) übergebe, knallt es mit einem TypeError, weil String iterierbar ist und jeder Buchstabe als HTTP-Methode interpretiert wird (also GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS... für 'POST'). Das ist verwirrend. Bitte konsolidiere die Eingabevalidierung hier.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a85a6168615f8f62", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:87dd825f5200", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "570e6654-1599-4d31-aa53-b15ccd78a6b3"}}
{"id": "3b614e024ce933a7", "prompt": "delete the redundant `examples/javascript/LICENSE.txt` file", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3b614e024ce933a7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:aa5dafc2082e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c177f59-b772-4942-b063-a04e08bbd376"}}
{"id": "5d7fcd7519626783", "prompt": "Hey, could you look at `src/flask/json/provider.py` and `src/flask/json/__init__.py`?\n\nThe `JSONProvider` implementation seems to be calling `dumps` and `loads` but it's losing the `default` argument when I pass custom encoders in the app constructor. Specifically, `app.config['JSON_SORT_KEYS']` is also being ignored in the provider.\n\nIt works fine if I don't use the provider, but since we upgraded to Flask 2.3+, the default provider is enabled and breaks our custom JSON serialisation. Please align the provider's public methods with the legacy app config keys.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5d7fcd7519626783", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:dc1fa847f5b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "498bcf34-9e3c-45e5-88ce-0f1ca9857454"}}
{"id": "4fa29b2613b22bdd", "prompt": "The config loading logic in `src/flask/config.py` is a bit messy with nested ifs. I need to standardize how we load env vars vs. file-based configs.\n\nRefactor the `from_file` method to extract the file parsing logic into a separate helper. Also, update `src/flask/sansio/app.py` to use this new helper if it does its own file config loading.\n\nKeep the public API of `Config` unchanged.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4fa29b2613b22bdd", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:8603feee9415", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "df1fde74-960f-4201-9481-9ca6506dcf86"}}
{"id": "50c717c904412cb3", "prompt": "Check pyproject.toml and uv.lock to see our current dependency versions. I want to see if we can bump Werkzeug to the latest version, but I'm worried about breaking changes in the WSGI layer. Can you check if any recent commits mention Werkzeug compatibility issues?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "50c717c904412cb3", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "flask:6d124be868e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "07693e7b-ba61-40df-a557-d462c66efab0"}}
{"id": "c2430495c83deed0", "prompt": "Hallo, beim Arbeiten mit `flask/sansio/scaffold.py` ist mir aufgefallen, dass `add_url_rule` keine korrekte Typisierung für `view_func` hat. In den Type-Hints steht `Callable | None`, aber es sollte eigentlich `View` oder `EndpointView` auch unterstützen, wenn wir moderne `@app.get()` Decorators nutzen. Meine IDE meckert rum (mypy). Bitte aktualisiere die Typen in `src/flask/typing.py` und sicherstellen, dass `sansio/scaffold.py` das korrekt anwendet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c2430495c83deed0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:eb41f6cbc891", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70365119-bc68-4547-a5f6-ebf1c848f95d"}}
{"id": "443ddf754d159bc2", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the src/flask directory. I want to get a sense of how much technical debt we have before the next big refactor.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "List them out with their file paths and line numbers."}, {"prompt": "Are any of them marked with a specific priority or deadline?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "443ddf754d159bc2", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:6281e63879a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19d033e2-f0b7-4614-b8f8-48b31fa26d95"}}
{"id": "d383c64f17f62faa", "prompt": "I'm debugging a blueprints static file routing issue. Look at tests/test_blueprints.py and src/flask/blueprints.py and tell me how static folders are resolved for nested blueprints.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d383c64f17f62faa", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:aa5facdf98be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1bd9d954-4077-4822-b1dd-e45216eee612"}}
{"id": "5e1f71db400f70ab", "prompt": "Hey, can you walk me through the logic in `src/flask/app.py` for how a request is actually dispatched to a view function?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5e1f71db400f70ab", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:d7d4fd0d3e63", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cff0a0fd-f274-4547-89af-68a04a147f11"}}
{"id": "9c4a034195883181", "prompt": "Create a new branch called `feature/blueprints-extension` and move my current changes over to it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9c4a034195883181", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:62b0cff8892e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70628b0a-19ef-4121-a17f-afe9919fe722"}}
{"id": "070770c2cd98b259", "prompt": "Show me a count of lines of code in src/flask. Break it down by file. I'm curious if app.py is still the biggest file or if blueprints.py has overtaken it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "070770c2cd98b259", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:abb20473dd9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0cbfdfb9-1216-40bb-b574-7b05b65ce9a9"}}
{"id": "69cf4b32aaf36bcb", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/test_basic.py` that verifies a simple hello world route returns a 200 status code.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also add a similar test for a route that returns a 404?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "69cf4b32aaf36bcb", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:481358b472b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6dd7b402-babd-42ab-9dfa-30b4ab160a5d"}}
{"id": "04f9b3fe2e8e1fbb", "prompt": "Find all imports of `src/flask/json/provider.py`. I want to see how the JSON provider is being used across the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "04f9b3fe2e8e1fbb", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:7f24dc164f39", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8574fb1e-0d33-42cd-92d3-06d2735d4662"}}
{"id": "8d2faac424213281", "prompt": "Can you go to https://nvd.nist.gov and search for any recent CVEs related to Flask or Jinja2 from the last 24 hours? I need to know if there's any immediate security patching we should be aware of for our Flask 2.3.x stack.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8d2faac424213281", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "flask:f5bef4ec07aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "433ba1ac-f1c6-43dc-bd39-9f5c5707db42"}}
{"id": "1b2d2f5bc8f4bbb9", "prompt": "I need to know where `before_first_request` is deprecated or removed. It's not in the latest flask docs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b2d2f5bc8f4bbb9", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:ccd81a12817a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea2a029c-a6aa-46d4-ae6d-f90ee5bb426c"}}
{"id": "d2f666aca44ca511", "prompt": "Can you check git blame on src/flask/app.py to see who last modified the Flask class definition?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d2f666aca44ca511", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:51c530543a4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "72f73da1-5ccb-41f2-b993-9e67b5e06c93"}}
{"id": "bb1345f395c8e208", "prompt": "I'm looking at examples/tutorial/flaskr/db.py. Why is `g` used to store the database connection instead of just creating it in each function? Is this related to thread safety?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bb1345f395c8e208", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:754472ccd9d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8809785c-2127-4466-9c9a-eef13e0feaff"}}
{"id": "084620fca203746c", "prompt": "¿Cómo funciona el sistema de registro de rutas en `src/flask/app.py`? Quiero entender cómo se asocian los decoradores a las funciones de vista.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "084620fca203746c", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:a3d02d4378a5", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "644703d5-5d78-4626-a6f6-89f839caa51a"}}
{"id": "69f9aa2bcb713abb", "prompt": "We need to add `python-dotenv` to the project so we can manage environment variables more easily in development. Add it to pyproject.toml.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "69f9aa2bcb713abb", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "flask:ea3b91196365", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2785b945-bb31-4d1a-a7fb-d80cf12c231b"}}
{"id": "08501d45d723edf6", "prompt": "Why is the .gitignore file not ignoring the build/ directory? I keep seeing build artifacts committed by accident in some forks. Please update .gitignore to explicitly ignore build/, dist/, *.egg-info/, and __pycache__/.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "08501d45d723edf6", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:95b97bd661f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "130478b4-2f7a-4076-ab29-7c473a860838"}}
{"id": "3d6cd6980cf24fa5", "prompt": "Can you perform a quick security audit on the CLI module? Specifically `src/flask/cli.py`. I'm concerned about command injection risks when users pass arguments to the `flask run` command. Also, check `examples/celery/make_celery.py` to ensure we aren't executing user input in the Celery configuration.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3d6cd6980cf24fa5", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "flask:5fb83eced041", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f97c1263-70ea-4d54-9203-22140393da5b"}}
{"id": "e8ddda217ff38683", "prompt": "测试文件：examples/tutorial/tests/test_factory.py\n我需要知道这个工厂函数在多次调用是否生成了不同的 app 实例。跑一下对应的测试用例，带上 -s 参数看输出。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e8ddda217ff38683", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:1619337d660e", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d717082-4329-4258-b060-26fc8b948f2f"}}
{"id": "5cd50df50d081860", "prompt": "Show me the most recent commit that touched the testing directory.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "List all branches in this repo."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5cd50df50d081860", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:0e51bdd3baf7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e16eb12-f7e0-4af6-8a67-4839493b19c8"}}
{"id": "96a2859305f9ded1", "prompt": "Why is my app raising a RuntimeWarning about 'unauthorized request'? I'm hitting an endpoint that isn't protected. Trace where this warning originates in src/flask/", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "96a2859305f9ded1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:5a9b9eba5b4b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "49af99e1-b592-4a80-9dac-cf7f74e62e3a"}}
{"id": "b5d5817bfee1aadf", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/flask/blueprints.py`. How does the `Blueprint` class actually register routes onto the main app object?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b5d5817bfee1aadf", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:2780daef6215", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f610d65-a59d-417f-8ed7-5a5f178d61f5"}}
{"id": "1e481501c66ee085", "prompt": "Esegui la suite di test completa per questo repo. Voglio sapere se ci sono regressioni prima di fare un merge. Fai attenzione alla lentezza, se impiega più di 5 minuti segnalamelo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1e481501c66ee085", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:00693a4cf096", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e761eb36-e37b-445e-a62f-364cf038dda6"}}
{"id": "35b5ce0e740d0a80", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments across the src/flask directory. I want to see if any of them have been there since the beginning or if they are urgent.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you filter out the TODOs that just say 'TODO: implement' and show me the ones with specific details?"}, {"prompt": "For the ones in ctx.py, can you check if they are still relevant given the recent async changes?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "35b5ce0e740d0a80", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:323b9d78dd0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12a75a79-c35b-423a-8d63-ee87b1694c0c"}}
{"id": "f84ee911ff4013a2", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue where the error message in `src/flask/app.py` when a route isn't found is too vague. Can we make it more descriptive?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f84ee911ff4013a2", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:baa5621c67b3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d48b5a53-9d1f-4c3c-b587-57597ba43ad7"}}
{"id": "0b79d170a9a847f3", "prompt": "Refactor the session handling logic to ensure better compatibility with modern WSGI servers. Specifically: 1) Review `src/flask/sessions.py` for any potential issues with cookie serialization. 2) Check `tests/test_session_interface.py` to ensure we have adequate coverage for edge cases like expired or malformed session cookies. 3) Look into `src/flask/wrappers.py` to see if the request context is correctly handling session updates during the teardown phase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b79d170a9a847f3", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "flask:30ae589da6df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ea010a6-5ada-4512-bb9a-4a1561b40e7a"}}
{"id": "36d4a09fc47a969d", "prompt": "I need to see the details for commit 05e9c6b", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36d4a09fc47a969d", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "flask:11ecb9002586", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5219bafd-b0aa-491b-8783-af43cf32a77c"}}
{"id": "56904c4cfbf072a1", "prompt": "I'm getting a `LookupError` in my unit tests when I try to access `sqlalchemy` via an extension without setting up the application context. Why does Flask require an active application context for many extensions, and how does `tests/conftest.py` usually handle this for test clients?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can I use `flask.g` to pass data into views without an app context?"}, {"prompt": "What is the difference between `app.test_client()` and the standard Werkzeug client?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "56904c4cfbf072a1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:7396759f4a22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e5d3f5a-9e91-4e34-980c-fe9dd96e3db4"}}
{"id": "705af1e7b067e4bd", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of noise in my local dev environment. Can you parse `pyproject.toml` and list all the optional dependency groups? I want to make sure I'm not installing the `docs` extra when I just want to develop core Flask features. Also, does `uv.lock` reflect all these extras correctly?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "705af1e7b067e4bd", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "flask:9d642c814545", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70152b03-829f-4f5d-b1f9-3b3ec3eb28b9"}}
{"id": "45f5333ed1b79b50", "prompt": "I need a random secret key for my local Flask app to avoid the 'RuntimeError: The session is stuck in untrusted state' error. Can you generate a secure 32-byte hex token?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "45f5333ed1b79b50", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "flask:4065a891fc9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4a7156e-c33c-4cd1-a14c-133ae9951081"}}
{"id": "955138da30ca8d3f", "prompt": "Revisa `src/flask/json/provider.py` y dime cómo se maneja la serialización de datos JSON personalizados.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "955138da30ca8d3f", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:bb5d087e1768", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a89fd76-3edb-436d-9770-ea41c350e729"}}
{"id": "48015f1378a5edb7", "prompt": "I'm getting an intermittent issue with IPv6 addresses. Check the recent commit `0599295` and tell me which files were changed to fix IPv6 server name parsing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "48015f1378a5edb7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "flask:d0b024d47f2a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "30e75020-9f38-49b6-b20d-2602ea053518"}}
{"id": "8e6ec686707db3e6", "prompt": "I'm seeing this error in test_basic.py:\n\n`FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'blueprints'\n\nBut looking at src/flask/blueprints.py, the import seems correct. Can you check the Flask contribution guidelines or the project's FAQ to see if there's a known issue with running tests in a symlinked directory or a specific virtualenv setup?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, looks like it might be a path resolution issue. Can you check the .github/workflows CI config to see how they normally run the tests?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8e6ec686707db3e6", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:cca36be09739", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e9f8ac9-a3c2-4ee0-8c41-89b8d348cf80"}}
{"id": "98e75bc25a27dd97", "prompt": "Run the pre-commit hooks to format and lint the entire repo. Please fix any issues that come up automatically. Once that's done, check if the build passes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "98e75bc25a27dd97", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:9df0cd60f595", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d1cc02e-3700-4e06-8c2a-36c582b165f4"}}
{"id": "8af6befb210cfb3b", "prompt": "帮我启动一个后台任务，运行完整的回归测试套件，别阻塞我的终端。跑完后把日志存在 /tmp/flask_test.log 里。\n\nnohup pytest tests/ > /tmp/flask_test.log 2>&1 &", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8af6befb210cfb3b", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:e82138783717", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "056f819e-494d-4442-ae9e-45f3ff86243e"}}
{"id": "f76b451b61971475", "prompt": "Hey, I'm trying to understand the differences between `Flask.json_provider_class` and the old `JSONProvider` mixin mentioned in the 2.0 migration guide. Can you point me to the official Flask docs on this? My app is breaking because I defined a custom provider using the old inheritance pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f76b451b61971475", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:bbb8f07ba05d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0e39b55b-5a39-4230-9dcd-fa698631dc40"}}
{"id": "4dca6a0646c5c9f0", "prompt": "He estado mirando `src/flask/blueprints.py`. ¿Podrías explicarme brevemente cómo se registra un blueprint en la aplicación principal?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4dca6a0646c5c9f0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:58874f6e6c3b", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95f3daff-12fb-4e80-adaa-a8e5583bf7bc"}}
{"id": "c1c515aefe7afed0", "prompt": "Devo capire come è implementata la gestione degli errori personalizzati. Vai su `tests/test_user_error_handler.py` e dimmi come viene registrato un handler personalizzato per il 404. C'è un esempio completo nel file di test?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c1c515aefe7afed0", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:3ef4f3bf082b", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35608656-26a7-4bf6-8099-09516b18604f"}}
{"id": "227c3b092b43d2cc", "prompt": "In `tests/test_templating.py`, the test `test_context_template` is failing on Python 3.10+. It seems like the `globals` passed to the template engine aren't being merged correctly with the default globals. \n\nCan you look at `src/flask/templating.py`? Specifically the `render_template` function. It looks like it might be overwriting `g` instead of merging it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "227c3b092b43d2cc", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:524e3a4730c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b8a0dd34-1bdf-4d0f-92ef-59a09df9e5b8"}}
{"id": "e4be0785445d45d8", "prompt": "How does Flask's templating engine handle variable escaping by default? I saw a commit mentioning 'case-insensitive comparison' for autoescape, but I need to know if I can disable it globally for specific templates like 'mail.txt'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e4be0785445d45d8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "flask:39b80c5eaaf7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b7971b68-01c1-4a4b-92d4-80ee32e7c392"}}
{"id": "ea5136ecb8b21eb2", "prompt": "Check `src/flask/json/provider.py`. I need to know how custom JSON encoders are implemented in the current version of Flask.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ea5136ecb8b21eb2", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:6505824ce71c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5f98417-71e9-428a-8660-f90cb09ed1f4"}}
{"id": "f117e5253c40f2a1", "prompt": "Hey, I'm getting a weird error when running the tests locally. It looks like build artifacts are messing with the imports. Can you clean the build directory and any .egg-info folders?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f117e5253c40f2a1", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "flask:a12d0aea4d23", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca0dc3e6-6db5-428d-b05a-5956afbfcef9"}}
{"id": "5783751c6bcd309e", "prompt": "Rename the `ctx` module in `src/flask/` to `context` and update all imports across the repository.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check git blame to see who last touched the imports in `src/flask/app.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5783751c6bcd309e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:b75affa72cc5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1445565d-1d99-4c8f-98e4-44af41e5b6cf"}}
{"id": "559d2cf8f78358e8", "prompt": "I'm cleaning up `src/flask/app.py` and noticed a lot of direct calls to `self._get_error_handler` in the view dispatch logic. This pattern is repeated in `src/flask/blueprints.py` and `src/flask/views.py` as well.\n\nCan you refactor this to ensure we're consistently using a central helper or method for locating error handlers? I want the signature to accept the `code_or_exception` and return `None` or the handler.\n\nPlease check `src/flask/debughelpers.py` to see if we can leverage any existing logic there or if we need to abstract it out.\n\nMake sure `tests/test_basic.py` still passes after you move this logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "559d2cf8f78358e8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "flask:cc5c0608bc6b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b54a02f8-72e7-4985-8112-53b82fec2f53"}}
{"id": "869bd825236b3afb", "prompt": "Check the diff of my current changes. If there are multiple distinct changes, split them into logical commits with good messages. Otherwise, just commit everything.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "869bd825236b3afb", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:ae1971dd0c19", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "251ef7c1-0813-401e-a2d2-775db7b0d477"}}
{"id": "1232d46ce07856d5", "prompt": "Ciao, ho un errore strano che si presenta solo quando avvio l'applicazione di esempio `examples/tutorial`. Non riesco a collegarmi al database. Puoi guardare il file `examples/tutorial/flaskr/db.py` e dirmi se c'è qualcosa di sbagliato nella connessione? Ecco il traceback:\n\nAttributeError: module 'flaskr.db' has no attribute 'connect'\n\nGrazie!", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ho corretto la chiamata a `sqlite3.connect` ma ora ricevo un `OperationalError` che dice che il file del database non esiste. Come posso fare in modo che il file venga creato automaticamente alla prima esecuzione?"}, {"prompt": "Perfetto, ora funziona! Potresti spiegarmi brevemente come la funzione `init_db` interagisce con il contesto dell'applicazione in `flaskr/__init__.py`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1232d46ce07856d5", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:dd7c29745a47", "lang": "it", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d1a647f-de0c-4671-804e-2d74d9b5435c"}}
{"id": "38ca0e40fa3f6070", "prompt": "add a simple test case in tests/test_basic.py that checks if the app instance is correctly initialized", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "38ca0e40fa3f6070", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:2539b450b01a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6af25e2e-8d74-43f1-97d3-f319525c3953"}}
{"id": "7479962a6845c618", "prompt": "In `src/flask/views.py`, add an optional `timeout` parameter to the `View.dispatch_request` method with a default value of None.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7479962a6845c618", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:42bc0af4c4f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4cb72e47-64cc-45f4-b287-042e1e4f5cd8"}}
{"id": "a4e3db2a26b98c68", "prompt": "I've been messing around with `tests/test_basic.py` and I'm not sure if I want to keep these changes. Can you stash my current changes in the repository so I have a clean working directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a4e3db2a26b98c68", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "flask:f0b3c4db3de6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53e564fd-0c9e-4241-b643-2292983bf4dc"}}
{"id": "7bbc864ba8c76f41", "prompt": "运行单元测试并告诉我结果：\n\npytest tests/test_basic.py -v", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "如果失败了，请把 traceback 贴给我"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7bbc864ba8c76f41", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "flask:5c9d8d6c01b2", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ef2adcd-11d7-47af-8159-8396521e6e08"}}
{"id": "b5f3fc19be0b054b", "prompt": "The `flask run` command is failing to start if my `.flaskenv` file has a blank line at the end.\n\n```\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \".../flask/__main__.py\", line 1, in <module>\n  ... \nValueError: Invalid variable assignment format\n```\n\nI checked `src/flask/cli.py` and it looks like the env loader isn't stripping lines before parsing. Fix it so blank lines and comments are ignored gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b5f3fc19be0b054b", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:0feb594fa980", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b12a149-0ad4-425b-91b0-fb7fc70e78bb"}}
{"id": "b49d3ad9996895a7", "prompt": "The error message `werkzeug.routing.BuildError: Could not build url for endpoint 'user.profile'` is showing up. I know this comes from Werkzeug's routing module. Can you link me to the Werkzeug docs on `build_error_handler`? I want to customize this error instead of just getting a 500.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b49d3ad9996895a7", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "flask:70bec1498fb9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66990d57-8f4b-4013-a01e-4065ac9564a3"}}
{"id": "1e795a035da37eab", "prompt": "tweak the error message in src/flask/app.py to be more descriptive when a route is not found. currently it's too generic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1e795a035da37eab", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "flask:1e785d67b47c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2dd36633-dd62-4c56-9c25-50d55331a351"}}
{"id": "5612ebb13d733cb8", "prompt": "In `src/flask/testing.py` the `FlaskClient.get` method handles redirects. I noticed that if I set `follow_redirects=False` but the response is a 302, the `response.location` header is sometimes missing or malformed when IPv6 is involved in a `Host` header. Can you check `src/flask/wrappers.py` and `src/flask/testing.py` to ensure the location header is parsed correctly for IPv6 hosts? I'm seeing issues with `request.host` returning weird strings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5612ebb13d733cb8", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:338696698c0e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bdac9f12-273d-4c67-a8e2-854437a7719b"}}
{"id": "5d79eb7ec0e72f4e", "prompt": "I'm seeing some logic in `src/flask/ctx.py`. Can you explain how the request context is pushed and popped? I need to know how it interacts with the application context.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5d79eb7ec0e72f4e", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "flask:a1d77fd9d5a4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5bf6d5de-55ea-46f8-8216-e859567b1a6e"}}
{"id": "5f8b7a0d737cd981", "prompt": "Can we add a type stub in `src/flask/py.typed`? Wait, it's already there.\n\nI mean, `src/flask/app.py` is throwing type errors in mypy when I access `app.jinja_env`. It says `Union[Dict[str, Any], Jinja2 Environment]` which is too loose.\n\nCan you update the type hints in `src/flask/app.py` so that `app.jinja_env` returns `jinja2.Environment` specifically? Also check `src/flask/templating.py` for the related types.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f8b7a0d737cd981", "repo": "flask", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "flask:a3b0146ef256", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "flask-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4012a502-db98-48c8-9ba5-21a9e9d1d82d"}}
{"id": "727e5e11f2069404", "prompt": "In `render/json.go`, update the error message returned when a renderer fails to include the requested content type.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "727e5e11f2069404", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:ef3ccd31ed2c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a3b68dc4-e56c-4d09-a252-221e6ec4c9d9"}}
{"id": "c344b046229de83c", "prompt": "I'm looking at `binding/json.go`. How does Gin decide which JSON engine to use? Does it prioritize `sonic` or `jsoniter` if they are available in the codec directory?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this logic also apply to the XML binding?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c344b046229de83c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:06c55dbdc1c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "353bf6bb-15c9-45fc-a30a-6eb9b5962402"}}
{"id": "b257a4fd96955bba", "prompt": "can you find all places in the repo where default_validator_test.go references binding.Bind?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b257a4fd96955bba", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:9080f6c910a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2ab3b0c-7ec1-4d11-93b2-2267f82dc794"}}
{"id": "c629d776e42d05a4", "prompt": "Please run go fmt ./... and go vet ./... across the entire repository. If there are any linting errors reported by golangci-lint, fix them. I also noticed some stale build artifacts in the root directory; can you clean those up? Finally, just make sure the project compiles cleanly with `go build ./...`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you catch any issues with the binding package specifically?"}, {"prompt": "Okay, commit all those changes with a message like 'chore: fmt, lint fixes, and cleanup'."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c629d776e42d05a4", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:9f3e15a52cca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56c92736-9220-4c0d-ac14-037bc32e85f0"}}
{"id": "41b5936f32a1e38b", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `binding/json_test.go` to verify that it correctly handles empty JSON objects.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "41b5936f32a1e38b", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:4ef45c5de31e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "070a5a52-8bd4-4686-a43e-617d811dad8a"}}
{"id": "70673cbe01d45ae3", "prompt": "How does `binding/form_mapping.go` handle different types of form inputs? Is it similar to how `binding/multipart_form_mapping.go` works?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "70673cbe01d45ae3", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:bf276c709ba6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d1d61f0-9fe5-4d3d-bb38-e09f99d4efb7"}}
{"id": "4713aa5191a0adbb", "prompt": "I'm trying to verify the current health status of the gin-gonic project. Can you check the Travis CI badge or the GitHub Actions page for the master branch to see if the build is currently passing? I need to know if the latest commit on main is green before I merge my PR.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4713aa5191a0adbb", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:f9db1932e128", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "60ea4598-ee0b-4d9f-b458-abbd9d9d8668"}}
{"id": "c44bf339059bd568", "prompt": "I'm looking at binding/json.go. How does the binding process actually interact with the different codec implementations in the codec/ directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c44bf339059bd568", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:57517ecc825b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e1350af-d7c0-43cf-8f90-a6be221b8a62"}}
{"id": "35dfc831bef424cc", "prompt": "The error message in `errors.go` for a missing context is a bit too cryptic. Can you change it from 'ctx nil' to 'context is required'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "35dfc831bef424cc", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:ade2f4818c3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56ba58e6-2e78-44d4-b155-1531260ddb15"}}
{"id": "8940fed15ba5f4e3", "prompt": "can you explain how the zero allocation router implementation works in tree.go?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8940fed15ba5f4e3", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:f07c1abd1186", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfa379b0-5c54-42dd-a610-e5ee19d1fcbd"}}
{"id": "249ed6800ff203b6", "prompt": "@assistant fix the panic in the router. I hit this:\n\npanic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:-1]\n\ngoroutine 1 [running]:\ngithub.com/gin-gonic/gin.(*engine).getValue(...)\n\nIt seems to happen when I try to access a deeply nested route. Check `tree.go` and `routergroup.go`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks, that fixed the immediate panic. However, the test suite is now failing on `routes_test.go`. Can you run `go test -v ./...` and show me the first failure?"}, {"prompt": "Okay, I see the issue in `tree_test.go`. Please stop the test runner."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "249ed6800ff203b6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:ceb5f508c691", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f005f7f1-e5da-4431-bde4-7e9b01a5e31a"}}
{"id": "c8cdd0695db4e321", "prompt": "tree.go getValue() has a bug where it doesn't reset the skippedNodes stack when entering a new branch.\n\nRef: #4818\n\nI have a route structure like:\nGET /api/v1/users\nGET /api/v1/users/:id/posts\nGET /api/v2/users\n\nWhen I hit /api/v2/users, the router occasionally panics with slice overflow because it's reusing stale node references.\n\nPlease look at the getValue function and ensure the skipped-nodes stack is properly reset on entry. This should prevent the slice overflow panic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8cdd0695db4e321", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:1e2fb815a811", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e7344eb8-4d60-4e40-8e6a-028b61d56d11"}}
{"id": "1630f201fdcee0a7", "prompt": "Ho fatto diverse modifiche in context.go e recovery.go per risolvere quel bug dei panic. Potresti dividere il lavoro in due commit separati e logicamente distinti? Usa messaggi di commit chiari in inglese.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1630f201fdcee0a7", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:78a5892cbdaf", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8e2ebf0c-08f0-4140-97ac-43542caf1d6f"}}
{"id": "b3c28fbd9739cef2", "prompt": "C'è un errore nel commit precedente, ho incluso per sbaglio dei log di debug in render/json.go. Puoi fare il revert di quell'ultimo commit e poi ripristinare il lavoro precedente?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b3c28fbd9739cef2", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:737cfc0e08da", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "61d6a5bd-78c7-4502-905f-6f5f148e58da"}}
{"id": "20ae630af1836937", "prompt": "The default ReadHeaderTimeout isn't being applied when I call `engine.Run(\":8080\")` directly without creating a custom `http.Server` first. \n\nCommit `d8f2d58` claims to add a default ReadHeaderTimeout, but in `gin.go`, the `Run` method creates a new server. If I look at the implementation:\n\n```go\nfunc (engine *Engine) Run(addr ...string) (err error) {\n    defer func() { printShutdownWarning() }()\n\n    server := &http.Server{\n        Addr:    addr[0],\n        Handler: engine,\n    }\n    return server.ListenAndServe()\n}\n```\n\nIt looks like the timeout is hardcoded elsewhere or missing from this specific path. Please check `gin.go` and ensure that `Run` applies the default HTTP read header timeout from the engine config to the server instance before listing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "20ae630af1836937", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:c597b606c861", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95beb8b7-fd4a-4d14-876f-6361ff44c154"}}
{"id": "29735825fc2dfc2c", "prompt": "The error message in `errors.go` for a 'not found' status is a bit too terse. Change it from 'not found' to 'the requested resource was not found' in the `ErrNotFound` variable.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "29735825fc2dfc2c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:0f8468401b51", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9d91c76-96cc-42c4-bc48-efec54a887cd"}}
{"id": "225233324b7c00fe", "prompt": "Can you go to the Go Report Card page for github.com/gin-gonic/gin and tell me what the current A+ rating breakdown looks like? I want to see if the 'gocritic' check is still complaining about the new recovery middleware implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "225233324b7c00fe", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:3dcb6aa8e97a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "764d9987-8753-426f-990a-c8aee6425663"}}
{"id": "825f8593cd3232e6", "prompt": "I'm getting a panic in recovery.go. Can you trace where the recovered panic is stored? I see it says `c.Errors` but I want to see the exact line where it's appended.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "825f8593cd3232e6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:21905f2100a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "019906be-a157-4b91-88af-12f6c3c46e5e"}}
{"id": "86511023b86174dd", "prompt": "Who made the last changes to context.go and what was the reason for the fix regarding the mutex?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "86511023b86174dd", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:4409519e769f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "15c3323b-e7b6-4e44-93c8-f6a84a4b5b63"}}
{"id": "bfb41420258671ad", "prompt": "The `Copy()` method in `context.go` doesn't seem to preserve the `Errors` slice correctly in some edge cases. I added a patch but the tests in `context_test.go` are still flaky. Can you check `internal/fs/fs.go` while you're at it? I'm getting warnings about unused imports there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bfb41420258671ad", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:4cf3055456b4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cc62c810-e716-4d83-9262-ffca7bb4c18d"}}
{"id": "5ac573c44c5ef1b6", "prompt": "There's a discrepancy in how we handle file uploads. Please:\n1. Inspect `context_appengine.go` and `fs.go` to see if there's any inconsistent behavior regarding file permissions.\n2. Fix the issue in `SaveUploadedFile` where it might be attempting unnecessary `chmod` calls on directories that already exist.\n3. Add a test in `context_test.go` using `t.TempDir()` to validate permission handling on different filesystems.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ac573c44c5ef1b6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:6bc91ab445ff", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a7058af-a46a-40c2-b8b8-c808b6c4dba2"}}
{"id": "f02e786e1cb33a1f", "prompt": "Audit the dependencies listed in go.mod for any known vulnerabilities. Especially check the x/crypto packages since there was a recent patch commit.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f02e786e1cb33a1f", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gin:e1018c241532", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5ea9c551-4a79-4d95-a036-663c64895387"}}
{"id": "03332aa5cc7e40b4", "prompt": "gin.go랑 routergroup.go의 관계를 보여주는 아키텍처 다이어그램을 Mermaid 문법으로 작성해서 README.md 하단에 넣어줘. 라우터가 어떻게 그룹화되고 엔진이랑 연결되는지 중심으로.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03332aa5cc7e40b4", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:321bd2e15c20", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "801c1507-4019-447c-9489-5ac5b1deabe9"}}
{"id": "6949201411f33a83", "prompt": "Check git blame for the implementation of cleanPath in path.go. I want to see who fixed the malformed comment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6949201411f33a83", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:d4961f1306de", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6d17ebc-88a2-4e91-a416-ebceef143f4b"}}
{"id": "a16de99c7cacbe7e", "prompt": "In `binding/form_mapping.go`, the struct tag parsing logic is scattered. Can you extract the `binding` tag parsing into a dedicated helper function? Do the same for the `uri` tag usage in `binding/uri.go` and `binding/form.go`. I want to ensure we aren't duplicating the string splitting and trimming logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a16de99c7cacbe7e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:b079ed6626c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc2abded-65c8-4539-8efb-9ccd0341dc84"}}
{"id": "6ffa9c2ac4ac1a7c", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the render package. How does render/render.go define the interface that allows different formats like JSON and XML to be used interchangeably in a handler?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "does the XML renderer in render/xml.go implement the same interface?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6ffa9c2ac4ac1a7c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:939728accb66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "114c1053-2d02-47b7-accb-00556f5156a0"}}
{"id": "c216bbc22e2bda19", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between binding query parameters and form data in Gin. Specifically, looking at binding/query.go and binding/form.go, is there any automatic fallback behavior where Gin tries to parse form data if query params are missing? Or do I need to explicitly handle that?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c216bbc22e2bda19", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:d26896862f9c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2179025-8068-463b-881d-c360dea5b6ab"}}
{"id": "4b3058c805f2ee86", "prompt": "JSON binding fails silently when the body is a valid JSON array but I'm binding it to a struct pointer. I expected an error, but `c.ShouldBind()` returns nil error and empty struct.\n\nTest case:\n```go\ndata := \"[{\\\"id\\\": 1}]\"\nreq, _ := http.NewRequest(\"POST\", \"/\", bytes.NewBufferString(data))\nw := httptest.NewRecorder()\nc, _ := CreateTestContext(w)\nc.Request = req\nc.Bind(&MyStruct{})\n```\n\nPlease check `binding/json.go` and `binding/binding.go`. It seems like the unmarshaler is not correctly handling array inputs when a struct destination is provided. It should return a clear error like 'unsupported type' or similar.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check if the same issue exists for `binding/msgpack.go`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b3058c805f2ee86", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:c18504837f0b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "702d54d7-c303-476d-9616-53149e2ab777"}}
{"id": "445ddea32b89d086", "prompt": "Hola, ¿me puedes ayudar a entender mejor el comportamiento de `gin.Engine` respecto al `ReadHeaderTimeout`? Recientemente vi un commit que añadía un límite por defecto. Quiero consultar la documentación estándar de la librería `net/http` de Go para confirmar cómo interactúa este timeout con las conexiones HTTP/2 y si Gin lo maneja correctamente en `gin.go` o si necesitamos configurarlo explícitamente para evitar cuelgues en producción.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "445ddea32b89d086", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:eab1ed61013e", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "20930643-6e94-4f07-bbe7-87c88ddece8c"}}
{"id": "a237972dc7476f4c", "prompt": "I need to bump the version number. Update `version.go` and the `version()` function to 1.13.0-dev. Also update the `go.mod` to reflect this change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a237972dc7476f4c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:d2cab4be90b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "296cb124-dffb-4a63-897c-8784b2e6b453"}}
{"id": "71e50b2742dc2768", "prompt": "In gin.go, the Run() method sets http.Server.ReadHeaderTimeout but doesn't set ReadTimeout or WriteTimeout. This is causing some of our downstream services to hang indefinitely on slow clients.\n\nCan you add ReadTimeout and WriteTimeout defaults similar to how ReadHeaderTimeout is handled? I want to default to 30s for all three if they aren't explicitly set.\n\nAlso update the godoc for Run() to reflect these defaults.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "71e50b2742dc2768", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:03d9dcafce59", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "403efa34-69f4-45fa-a5b9-81e1d20bc546"}}
{"id": "b97f65b333e57d8a", "prompt": "find where Context.Copy() handles the Keys map concurrency", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b97f65b333e57d8a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:9d6cffb5dc9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22dd1931-a8ab-48d8-abbc-2748c49b5375"}}
{"id": "48e363bf1b3b203c", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic in `binding/form_mapping.go`? I want to understand how it maps form fields to struct tags.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does it handle nested structs during the mapping process?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any performance bottlenecks in the way it iterates through the fields?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "48e363bf1b3b203c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:21231d4fa07e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39dd18f0-9dd3-454f-91bc-27c747197b85"}}
{"id": "f22f6bc5191ae7de", "prompt": "Open a terminal so I can manually inspect the files in the testdata/ directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f22f6bc5191ae7de", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:3cf407aad878", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f554708b-e93c-4f49-abdb-0518395cd56e"}}
{"id": "ce909ead9d779c2c", "prompt": "Hola, estoy revisando la configuración de `.golangci.yml` y veo que estamos usando la versión actual del linter. Según la documentación oficial de golangci-lint en su sitio web, ¿hay alguna opción nueva en la última versión que recomienden habilitar por defecto para mejorar la detección de errores comunes en proyectos Gin? Necesito saber si hay recomendaciones oficiales que no estemos cumpliendo.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Si encuentras alguna configuración recomendada, descríbeme cómo integrarla en nuestro `.golangci.yml` actual sin romper las reglas existentes."}, {"prompt": "¿Podrías verificar si hay alguna regla descontinuada en nuestra configuración actual según el changelog oficial?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ce909ead9d779c2c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:14263a4f6184", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6af007e7-770c-4187-ab96-0b084e77db98"}}
{"id": "f58de420154a9bcd", "prompt": "I'm seeing deprecation warnings in my gin app. Looking at deprecated.go, what specific functions or methods are being phased out in the latest release, and what are the recommended replacements for them based on the current codebase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f58de420154a9bcd", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:b5c5f2aa5c9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6337efb-04bc-4a33-a964-32c77d4a2ea9"}}
{"id": "691d3e893959105e", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` parameter to the `Run` method in `gin.go` so we can control the server lifecycle better.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "691d3e893959105e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:dd86dcfea42b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "edf1d311-cad4-4d94-87a3-94039748384b"}}
{"id": "06a8bbca59061d1a", "prompt": "The `recovery.go` middleware should probably be more descriptive when it catches a panic. Can you modify it to ensure the recovered panic is always appended to `c.Errors` as per the recent fix in commit 4a3eb31?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06a8bbca59061d1a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:c7280962d08f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53ee6115-ca05-4a1e-b13d-7fe5534ef5db"}}
{"id": "7ba7b5423a10aec9", "prompt": "We need to add a new dependency for handling specialized TOML configurations. Check if there's an existing implementation in binding/toml.go that we can extend, or if we should add a new library to go.mod.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ba7b5423a10aec9", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gin:1d53fca30c48", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6abb6735-ae4e-4a40-9b1d-ad4d777c891d"}}
{"id": "bd84901cbd725b9e", "prompt": "fix: recovery middleware doesn't capture panic information correctly when running in test mode.\n\nI'm seeing this in my logs:\n\n[GIN] 2023/10/27 - 10:00:00 | 500 |     24.1µs |       127.0.0.1 | GET      \"/panic\"\n\nBut the `c.Errors` slice is empty after the request completes, even though I expected the recovered panic to be there. This was working in v1.11 but broke recently.\n\nCheck recovery.go and recovery_test.go. The commit bc141b4 mentions recording panics in c.Errors - did something break that logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bd84901cbd725b9e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:6134c465b34c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cda3c2cd-43e7-4bff-a415-ca71e08ec622"}}
{"id": "78ced9381d8ec7c2", "prompt": "In `render/json.go`, rename the internal `marshalConfig` variable to `jsonConfig` and update all references in that file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "78ced9381d8ec7c2", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:9fe235dea494", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "742c469b-9e81-48e6-b6a3-afb2c7f052f3"}}
{"id": "c80a650ac1c54dd3", "prompt": "Can you explain the design rationale behind the 'zero allocation router' in Gin? I see it relies on httprouter. How does the radix tree structure in `tree.go` specifically avoid heap allocations during route matching compared to a standard trie or simple string splitting approach?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c80a650ac1c54dd3", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:40a90c2d9fd0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2aa7f19-fa60-425e-99f0-9932bb06e46e"}}
{"id": "7f2a243fe82795d5", "prompt": "check git blame on the Bind function in gin.go", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7f2a243fe82795d5", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:ea7baf1c0024", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "993f6021-d682-4a10-9949-63bfbf5e4408"}}
{"id": "57389ae81409e992", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `binding/json_test.go` that checks how the binder handles deeply nested JSON structures with invalid types.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "57389ae81409e992", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:862c45ce2ac0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75d5487b-b4a9-47fb-940f-9d778f1f7b30"}}
{"id": "33891ebf8efca0c2", "prompt": "Refactor `binding/json.go` to use the new codec implementation instead of the old one.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That looks good. Create a new branch called `feat/json-codec-refactor` and commit these changes with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "33891ebf8efca0c2", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:b94f03fed1b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1ea59bc-5440-4487-8cb8-06d97c715704"}}
{"id": "6a11c6433c7b49b0", "prompt": "I need to bump the version in version.go and go.mod for the next release. It's currently 1.11.0, make it 1.12.0. Also, add a release note entry in CHANGELOG.md for this version under a new '## [1.12.0] - Unreleased' header. Don't forget to update the copyright year in the LICENSE file if it's still 2023.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6a11c6433c7b49b0", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:3cf5de58cfc7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "477e6096-18a2-467a-9c0d-acd77a3b9aa8"}}
{"id": "c1ece8175f2de325", "prompt": "I've been working on some fixes in `context.go` and `recovery.go`. Can you look at my uncommitted changes, split them into two logical commits (one for context fixes and one for recovery improvements), and commit them?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c1ece8175f2de325", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:ec338a3b4a07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ea2a10e-1f54-4885-888a-f99a3b161059"}}
{"id": "c1ab5715552d4c24", "prompt": "Recovery middleware is not capturing panics that happen inside a recovered panic handler. \n\nIn `recovery.go`, if I have a custom panic handler that itself panics, the second panic crashes the server instead of being logged and recovered. \n\nTrace:\n```\nRecovery caught panic: original panic\nRecovery caught panic: new panic in handler\nServer crashed.\n```\n\nPlease modify `recovery.go` to ensure that if the recovery handler itself panics, it is also caught and handled gracefully, or at least logged before the process exits. The goal is to never let the server crash due to issues in the error handling path itself.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c1ab5715552d4c24", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:49e94417c6db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "67549d62-b104-416f-a50f-7e0aa19ae8c8"}}
{"id": "5e78aabd58213920", "prompt": "Why does Gin use separate renderers for JSON, XML, YAML, etc. instead of just one generic renderer that detects content type? I'm looking at the render/ directory and seeing many files. What's the architectural benefit of this separation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e78aabd58213920", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:bcf396a8d309", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29a31980-8a65-4d4e-8254-a6a682b88424"}}
{"id": "461be48a5fc7b48a", "prompt": "Per favore, salva tutte le mie modifiche attuali in uno stash, perché devo passare velocemente a un fix urgente su un altro branch.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "461be48a5fc7b48a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:e34fb6e7eabc", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70958bdb-4624-4389-95c4-6c102cf28b53"}}
{"id": "f0cc0de3b8d48788", "prompt": "Run golangci-lint on the context.go file. I saw some warnings in my IDE and want to make sure it's clean.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f0cc0de3b8d48788", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:44f119a7c076", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f780d687-3928-4649-88df-1da24be2ef00"}}
{"id": "6ca2bec8195a9079", "prompt": "Look at `render/json.go`. If I call `c.JSON()`, how does it actually interface with the `codec/json` package to write the response?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6ca2bec8195a9079", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:9e36fab71f41", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ba4d1a8-31d7-4cfb-918a-01ac894df135"}}
{"id": "e4e5901287fff922", "prompt": "Run the full test suite. I need to know if anything broke after the recent router changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e4e5901287fff922", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:f66fb7f561b5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba65d275-5548-401f-8444-b41f5712e371"}}
{"id": "cc3a847dc327c896", "prompt": "compare the current master branch with the state at commit d8f2d58", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc3a847dc327c896", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:c2b7cd0d7ff4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2037cd51-11fd-41d7-aab8-9bec2b0786a4"}}
{"id": "941a6b3af702542a", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between `c.ShouldBind()` and `c.Bind()`. The docs say one returns an error and one panics, but I want to know which one is actually recommended for production APIs and why. Is it better to handle validation errors explicitly in a middleware?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "941a6b3af702542a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:6b910070de14", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f900901a-9318-48b5-8156-19fa37d7da31"}}
{"id": "8c797dcee23c350e", "prompt": "where does gin set the default ReadHeaderTimeout for http.Server?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8c797dcee23c350e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:dd0777c3ca7a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0cd9a815-faa5-470b-82e4-990435e89af4"}}
{"id": "468ab7284dc4e6bc", "prompt": "find me the ginS package files and tell me what functions it exposes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, now find where ginS.gins.go is imported in the rest of the codebase."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "468ab7284dc4e6bc", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:72a125e9004e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6cdf64be-8f05-483d-8e28-d3e7ab2447c2"}}
{"id": "df9aa86c4a58b722", "prompt": "Scan `render/` for SSRF or path traversal risks. Specifically, look at `html.go` and `reader.go` (for static files). If someone controls the template name or file path passed to the renderers, can they escape the template directory or read arbitrary files? Also, check `response_writer.go` for header injection vulnerabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df9aa86c4a58b722", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:81ec40695598", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a50448b2-d68a-44bc-b56a-4782584b48e3"}}
{"id": "2bada6115a46abab", "prompt": "please run the linter and fix any issues it reports", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did the linter pass now?"}, {"prompt": "Can you also check if the tests pass?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2bada6115a46abab", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:bfa71ec058f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3f03498-c6ee-46a3-8365-d2782165070f"}}
{"id": "fc6a79a0fc2f3d27", "prompt": "Fix the nil pointer dereference in context.go Copy() method. It looks like it's not handling the mutex lock correctly for Keys.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run context_test.go to ensure we didn't break existing copy behavior"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fc6a79a0fc2f3d27", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:8ff5d8cd07c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "326f99d1-d27d-48f0-a7e2-e263491c65f1"}}
{"id": "7d191066678a9454", "prompt": "Why does Gin use a trie-based router instead of a simple map or regexp matcher? I see tree.go in the repo. Is the 'zero allocation' claim in the README strictly about the router lookup, or does it apply to the handler execution as well?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7d191066678a9454", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:b705cd6e3d99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1169f98-e9fe-4c93-a03a-7e2b7261e86d"}}
{"id": "18ac6c0e431a4044", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the codebase and list them out for me. Group them by file.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `binding/form_mapping.go` specifically, I think there's a stale TODO there."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "18ac6c0e431a4044", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:81b8a06e8dc9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea0cc872-10d8-42c2-9f37-8ba89e8365c9"}}
{"id": "13944b9f23a603f6", "prompt": "find all TODO comments in the codebase", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Group them by file"}, {"prompt": "List any TODOs in the binding package"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "13944b9f23a603f6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:790370befb4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3e328eb-6081-4f21-a8fd-f18789c4b1d6"}}
{"id": "80f9cb0fac82830c", "prompt": "Modifica il file Makefile per aggiungere un comando `make lint-all` che esegua golangci-lint su tutto il progetto.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Perfetto, ora crea un commit per questa modifica e passa al branch `main`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "80f9cb0fac82830c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:3553df0ed16c", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfe6e5b4-07ab-4ef8-a0fe-392d366f1c01"}}
{"id": "fd923d3cf0ab2388", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug a panic in Copy. Can you show me the definition of the Copy method on context and where it's called from?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fd923d3cf0ab2388", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:b36117e91b4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64e4660e-9428-47ec-8ee6-25f78284845f"}}
{"id": "8aec9f7a9371af6a", "prompt": "We're doing a pre-release security audit for v1.12.0. Can you scan the `binding/` directory, specifically `form_mapping.go` and `multipart_form_mapping.go`, looking for potential ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vectors or unbounded recursion in the form parsing logic? Also check `codec/json/` for any improper handling of untrusted JSON depth or complexity.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8aec9f7a9371af6a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:66c6fbe6a6fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ae65660-3abd-44c6-8a6c-d15414f56c3d"}}
{"id": "4c193ffc1fdae93a", "prompt": "How does the recovery middleware work under the hood? I see recovery.go uses defer/recover. If a handler panics, does it stop the entire server or just that request? Also, how are the recovered panics exposed to the client via c.Errors?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c193ffc1fdae93a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:f9a001a98d01", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "687067de-033e-4e29-a27e-f924453dcd4e"}}
{"id": "a0e32cf56dad3700", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify context.go and what was the commit message?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you explain the changes made in that commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a0e32cf56dad3700", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:889c0a932edd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0fa2eb93-6f2e-4a8f-aa1b-281e00226d6f"}}
{"id": "8b2f090f5aad13ab", "prompt": "I suspect `context.go` has a data race issue with the `Keys` map when using `Copy()`. The recent commit `1bd0ecf` mentions loading keys under a mutex, but can you double-check the implementation of `copyContext` and `Copy` to ensure no map reads happen without holding the lock? Also, check if `GetStoredRequest` in the renderer or binding packages accesses any request-scoped context values without proper locking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b2f090f5aad13ab", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:6866a5cd8825", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "baf3365f-2fbc-482c-8fd6-e8ad70f6ffc3"}}
{"id": "7a13580516c6141c", "prompt": "Hi, I'm looking at the error log from CI: `panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on零 Value`. This is happening in `internal/fs/fs.go` when we try to serve a directory that doesn't exist. I found a similar issue reported in the standard library issues, but I want to confirm the recommended way to handle this in Go 1.21+ according to the official file handling docs. Is wrapping it in `os.IsNotExist` still the best practice, or is there a better pattern for error handling in `ginS/gins.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a13580516c6141c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:08964df2d16d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a2e9c48-84e6-425e-b935-67f38fe210ca"}}
{"id": "7e04b641ee9a9c1d", "prompt": "Where is the `Bind` method actually implemented in the Gin codebase? I need to know which file handles the JSON and form binding logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7e04b641ee9a9c1d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:60baaf0b3544", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6f51104-5c5c-4a62-ae05-042756d3725f"}}
{"id": "2cf911a8e80e2d61", "prompt": "Hey, can we optimize the JSON binding in `binding/json.go`? It seems like we're doing unnecessary allocations when decoding large payloads. I saw some comments in `codec/json/json.go` about using `sonic` or `jsoniter` but the default validator still falls back to the standard library in some code paths. Can you unify this?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2cf911a8e80e2d61", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:198c7a2a00c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4eb60536-fc35-491a-beb2-a544bca6efac"}}
{"id": "abe63d3bae55a70e", "prompt": "I need a random 32-character hex string for a local development JWT secret. Can you generate one for me?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "abe63d3bae55a70e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:7575c57d082c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c1f5cd89-3230-40f8-b2fb-9653ba504b9f"}}
{"id": "b46478333ad40513", "prompt": "Compare the changes in the binding directory between the current version and the version before the validator library was updated to 10.30.3.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b46478333ad40513", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:ca74829f42c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "553d5d11-a712-4c5b-a3a5-2f6625ce584c"}}
{"id": "84bc3bbba46750eb", "prompt": "Rename the `Bind` function in `binding/binding.go` to `BindRequest` and update all references across the repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "84bc3bbba46750eb", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:e3cf97fbb584", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f65d4642-be8d-45b8-a664-7bc061f5c0d0"}}
{"id": "7431ce1db254039a", "prompt": "I want to clean up the codebase and improve documentation quality. Please:\n1. Go through `binding/form_mapping.go` and `binding/json.go` and fix any malformed or incorrect comments (specifically looking for comments that reference nonexistent functions/types).\n2. Search the repo for any `deprecated.go` usage and ensure the doc comments are properly formatted.\n3. Check `Makefile` to see if we can add a target for running the security scan.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Once done, run the golangci-lint to see if any new issues pop up from the changes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7431ce1db254039a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:75e4d3a5c3c6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "520a172d-177c-44b4-b1fa-916b8fcfed5f"}}
{"id": "afca4dc58e8b34e1", "prompt": "We are seeing some instability in the CI pipeline regarding the context handling. I need you to:\n\n- Investigate `context.go` and the `Copy()` method to ensure it's fully thread-safe as per the recent fix in commit 1bd0ecf.\n- Check `context_appengine.go` for any compatibility issues with the new context copying logic.\n- Run the existing tests in `context_test.go` and see if you can trigger any race conditions using the `-race` flag.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "afca4dc58e8b34e1", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:85dcdab94f26", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "601a3e32-6324-4dd9-bc45-8e9c3d88cd76"}}
{"id": "8eb2c04fa6753db6", "prompt": "which files export the render types like JSON, XML, and YAML? I need to implement a custom renderer but want to see how the built-in ones are structured first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8eb2c04fa6753db6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:d49891fbab6f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef93a67a-e7c1-4d80-be3d-f81236292e74"}}
{"id": "1fb889f80c8e6990", "prompt": "Estoy teniendo problemas con la validación en `binding/validate_test.go`. La librería de validación (`go-playground/validator`) acaba de salir con una nueva versión y veo que en `go.mod` tenemos una versión anterior. ¿Podrías buscar en la guía de migración oficial del paquete de validación qué cambios rompientes hay entre la versión actual (`v10.x`) y la más reciente? Específicamente me preocupa cómo trata los campos estructurales ahora.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1fb889f80c8e6990", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:54ae840a662b", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8569ccf-eb17-412d-83d3-b7d32f4ec12d"}}
{"id": "1736e8649606b554", "prompt": "Aggiungi un test unitario in binding/json_test.go per verificare che il binding dei campi obbligatori funzioni correttamente con i nuovi validator.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ottimo, ora crea un nuovo branch chiamato `feat/json-validation-tests` e fai il commit di questa modifica con un messaggio appropriato."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1736e8649606b554", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:a3ed8441b59b", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "047e0157-08e8-4f42-b6df-ba47278ae7c9"}}
{"id": "f69653d6fce79517", "prompt": "show me what changed in the last 24 hours", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f69653d6fce79517", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:9435554159e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "34609b72-8798-4aaf-9173-f83769e741c2"}}
{"id": "a1e77eb19598ff5d", "prompt": "I need to understand how the HTTP QUERY method is handled. which file implements that shortcut?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a1e77eb19598ff5d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:4e43d193dc21", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "212ea49a-da9e-4e54-89eb-3d76588dbda6"}}
{"id": "b50ee7e0e9b8c551", "prompt": "Ho sbagliato a scrivere il commento nella funzione cleanPath in path.go. Correggi il commento per riflettere il comportamento reale e poi fai l'amend dell'ultimo commit per includerlo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b50ee7e0e9b8c551", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:a8543ef738df", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1e2d981-745b-4d74-8bd2-a66ee146da3b"}}
{"id": "89205bdd14f813c5", "prompt": "I'm confused about the router's handling of route parameters. If I have `/user/:id` and `/user/me`, does the router check `/user/me` first or does it always go to the wildcard? I need to know the exact precedence rules.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does the radix tree structure in tree.go optimize this lookup?"}, {"prompt": "Can I register static routes after wildcard routes and will it still work correctly?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "89205bdd14f813c5", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:4e7d6616845b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6efb0df-99a1-45eb-8193-5535b22fab69"}}
{"id": "c8e6ec5d7fd3fc8a", "prompt": "CHANGELOG.md에 이번 1.12.0 릴리스 내역을 작성해야 해. 최근 커밋들 보니까 context.Copy() 수정사항이랑 recovery 미들웨어에서 panic 기록하는 기능 개선된 게 중요해 보여. 정리해서 넣어줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8e6ec5d7fd3fc8a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:401d7e08b24a", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f493b08-9175-43ae-adb0-4c0bef5d44df"}}
{"id": "7435c2ca1d2d870a", "prompt": "I need to verify the `render` package covers all supported formats. \n\nList all files in `render/` and cross-reference them with the supported media types defined in `render/render.go`. \n\nAre there any renderers implemented but not exported or missing from the main registry? Return a table of Format -> Renderer -> Exported.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7435c2ca1d2d870a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:8885b2bfb251", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec0b7fc6-4986-4f5c-a91b-d091b579d3db"}}
{"id": "2d1ab97dec33a4c3", "prompt": "I'm looking for the source of the 'panic on Hijack' issue. which file handles Hijack and CloseNotify?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2d1ab97dec33a4c3", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:126ea369733d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "62b8e00b-98ff-45c5-9a18-a548a728782f"}}
{"id": "c7c7c17caa45cda2", "prompt": "I'm hitting a panic in `tree.getValue` when sending a rapid burst of concurrent requests to a specific nested route.\n\nStack trace:\n```\npanic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:3] with capacity 2\n\ngoroutine 108 [running]:\ngithub.com/gin-gonic/gin.(*node).getValue(0xc000123400, 0xc000102000, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, {0xc000156000, 0x3, 0x3})\n    /home/user/gin/tree.go:245 +0x4a5\ngithub.com/gin-gonic/gin.(*Engine).handleHTTPRequest(0xc0000d8000, 0xc000123200)\n    /home/user/gin/gin.go:630 +0x8c4\n...\n```\n\nThe commit message for `3b08cd7` mentions \"reset skipped-nodes stack on getValue entry to prevent slice overflow panic\". It looks like the previous fix might have been incomplete or reintroduced a race condition. Please review `tree.go` again, specifically the `getValue` logic, and apply a robust fix for the skipped-nodes stack management.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c7c7c17caa45cda2", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:33302cff84ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c9fe35b-d605-4cc6-85b6-4623a35b260c"}}
{"id": "833bfea90296bde8", "prompt": "There was a commit recently regarding updating the validator library to 10.30.3. Can you verify if our current binding/default_validator.go is fully compatible with this version or if we need to update the implementation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "833bfea90296bde8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gin:776d04d57564", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4dd2db6-7c7c-4820-b593-ad83694c1635"}}
{"id": "0d114ad062479eab", "prompt": "How does the context Copy mechanism work under the hood? I saw a recent commit about loading Keys under a mutex. Does every call to c.Copy allocate a new context map even if I didn't add any values to c.Keys?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d114ad062479eab", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:99c113ee435d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec209fdf-8799-4f66-bdbc-45a882c22103"}}
{"id": "9160e27768747f43", "prompt": "where does binding/query.go define the Query binding logic? I need to see the function signature.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9160e27768747f43", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:e536a93e61b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4803899-cc13-4bd8-b764-94892920038f"}}
{"id": "2804c6ccd8ab30b8", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with context copying. Can you check `context.go` and see if `Copy()` correctly handles the `Errors` and `Accepted` fields like the recent fix intended?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there any risk of a race condition when accessing these fields in the copied context?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2804c6ccd8ab30b8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:952a79047ed5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47695601-2b1d-485b-8e1d-d080c9e78821"}}
{"id": "5e405f31a2efe12d", "prompt": "In gin.go, how is the ReadHeaderTimeout applied to the http.Server when calling the Run methods?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e405f31a2efe12d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:8308a7d7b5df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a1cbb51-b942-4af0-ae06-5bd7c9342b24"}}
{"id": "d215208e38c73d66", "prompt": "The last commit `3b08cd7` actually introduced a regression in how the stack is reset. Revert that commit immediately.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d215208e38c73d66", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:2526327a5f4b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5bca252-29fb-4813-86c0-cb4c9607d3cf"}}
{"id": "d7291bcd883d9e51", "prompt": "find where the QUERY method support was added", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Which commit introduced this?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7291bcd883d9e51", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:59725cd20bf8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "727e25fc-8c98-45b2-98cb-4b197bab1507"}}
{"id": "4f9598dc127f455a", "prompt": "Wait, I accidentally added a debug print in `gin.go`. Can you amend the last commit to remove that line?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4f9598dc127f455a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:382151d35880", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3eb2ecc5-3f64-43a2-b091-ee56489db4f8"}}
{"id": "99dada0e94571ca3", "prompt": "Can you explain how the `Copy` method in `context.go` works? I saw a recent commit about loading Keys under a mutex there and want to understand the current implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "99dada0e94571ca3", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:d090a36eff6a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50deacdb-62f5-4fe9-8a9f-e0f427bbe603"}}
{"id": "50686215107d98d9", "prompt": "binding/json.go 파일에 JSON 응답 시 에러 메시지 형식을 커스텀할 수 있는 옵션 좀 추가해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "50686215107d98d9", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:6f521583ebfc", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b492272e-0579-44d6-ac0f-43704fe885d7"}}
{"id": "34842158eea886c6", "prompt": "Review `render/json.go` and tell me how it decides which JSON encoder to use (go_json, jsoniter, or sonic) based on the available packages.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "34842158eea886c6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:6db739b08279", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a3163f2-59be-4868-bdc2-38b811eaaa6d"}}
{"id": "a45c5ca2317e7a53", "prompt": "We need to standardize the route registration. Currently we have `GET`, `POST`, `PUT`, `PATCH`, `DELETE`, `HEAD`, `OPTIONS` defined in `routergroup.go`. The commit history mentions adding `QUERY` method support. Please update `routergroup.go` and `gin.go` to ensure the `QUERY` method is handled consistently with the other HTTP methods in the shortcuts and the router tree.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a45c5ca2317e7a53", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:d74119c3dac1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78a51b2d-09f2-44a1-8afa-19a1f943979d"}}
{"id": "3f30e1eb9d8e3976", "prompt": "최근에 `BindXML` 관련해서 주석 오류가 있었다고 커밋에 보이던데, binding/xml.go 파일의 관련 문서 주석이 최신 코드랑 일치하는지 확인하고 틀렸으면 수정해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3f30e1eb9d8e3976", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:85e560bbb4d1", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92d4fe64-c52e-4126-9689-fed74446b05e"}}
{"id": "ca19cfd9c9e5d85d", "prompt": "The `logger.go` and `debug.go` files have some overlapping configuration logic regarding the `GIN_MODE`. Please consolidate the mode checking and initialization logic into `mode.go`. Move the environment variable reading from `logger.go` into the central `SetMode` function in `mode.go` and have `logger.go` call that.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ca19cfd9c9e5d85d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:98afa0845ff9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56fedb1b-2cbe-4dc1-ab84-ccc1de35cf6b"}}
{"id": "b53e5e57726a938e", "prompt": "The dependency list is getting stale. Please:\n1. Audit `go.mod` and update `golang.org/x/net` and `golang.org/x/text` to their latest patched versions.\n2. Check `github.com/stretchr/testify` and ensure we are aligned with v1.12.1.\n3. Run `go mod tidy` and then run the full test suite to make sure nothing broke with the version bumps.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b53e5e57726a938e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:8951c834fe4c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63ec06f5-7efc-4016-a411-2c6987dcae67"}}
{"id": "0e6dbb6545d02679", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior in the context copying. Can you add a `Timeout` field to the `Context` struct in `context.go` and make sure it's properly handled in the `Copy()` method?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e6dbb6545d02679", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:1c3d5836f8e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce42b33e-2465-4928-8917-13eb65c1f63a"}}
{"id": "2328dab49b7f925e", "prompt": "I need to understand our dependency surface area. Can you generate a quick report listing all direct dependencies from `go.mod` and count how many of them have `v1.10.0` or higher in `go.sum`? Just give me the filenames and the counts for the top 5.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2328dab49b7f925e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:939ef9eb68dc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c846b871-ffe3-4764-863c-990ae4968d79"}}
{"id": "41cff2719dfa19a8", "prompt": "I'm refactoring the error handling in gin. Can you replace all instances of `errors.New(\"...\")` within `gin.go` and `context.go` with a call to `gErr.New(\"...\")` using the `github.com/gin-gonic/gin` errors package? Just do the mechanical search and replace for now.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do the same for `binding/binding.go`"}, {"prompt": "Check if there are any imports of `std/errors` that can now be removed"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "41cff2719dfa19a8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:09dfea6654b3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "94ba8465-7f8d-4c9a-8183-47b3c771d46e"}}
{"id": "2ac12602061b3bc7", "prompt": "I'm seeing some reports of potential memory leaks or issues with long-running requests. I need you to investigate three things:\n1. Look at `recovery.go` to see if we are correctly capturing all necessary panic metadata in `c.Errors` as per the recent fix.\n2. Examine `response_writer.go` to ensure the `Flush()` implementation handles cases where the underlying `http.ResponseWriter` doesn't implement `http.Flusher` without panicking.\n3. Verify that `context.go` is properly using mutexes when accessing/copying keys to prevent race conditions during high concurrency.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ac12602061b3bc7", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:79d4b35261de", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf054726-e592-4e5f-8f27-1c4215c3aa65"}}
{"id": "87da70b32a305783", "prompt": "Why does the Gin router return 404 for OPTIONS requests by default if I don't explicitly handle them, and how does the zero-allocation router design relate to this behavior compared to standard library http.ServeMux?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "87da70b32a305783", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:620b6ee1a0b5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9184f3b-3b3b-4c88-9b00-b7e6504ac307"}}
{"id": "e754e27dee62cf3f", "prompt": "URGENT: Security vulnerability in rendering XML.\n\nWhen rendering XML via `render/xml.go`, special characters in tags are not being escaped correctly. If I pass `c.XML(200, \"<script>alert('xss')</script>\")`, the output contains the raw script tag.\n\nPlease fix the escape logic in the XML renderer. Also, check `binding/xml_test.go` to ensure the unescaping logic is symmetric.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e754e27dee62cf3f", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:fcbaed8c52de", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e79d4ed6-d438-434f-8535-b26f62d3a93e"}}
{"id": "4321f68bc2e4d795", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the next version release. Please handle the following tasks:\n1. Audit `render/` directory to ensure all existing renderers (JSON, XML, YAML, etc.) correctly implement the required interface and check if any new ones need to be added.\n2. Review `binding/` implementation for any potential nil pointer dereferences during the `Bind` calls, specifically looking at `binding/json.go` and `binding/form.go`.\n3. Update the documentation in `README.md` and `doc.go` to reflect the latest design decisions mentioned in recent commits regarding error handling.\n\nLet me know when each part is done.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4321f68bc2e4d795", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:62aa74ce08c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c34bb0c-44e5-4d67-9b69-edba894c5193"}}
{"id": "f9b08f9dc5d0e1cf", "prompt": "Check the current status of https://status.gin-gonic.com. I'm seeing intermittent 502 errors in our staging environment and want to rule out an ongoing incident on Gin's infrastructure.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check the HTTP response headers from https://gin-gonic.com? I need to verify if the strict-transport-security header is present."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f9b08f9dc5d0e1cf", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:ab6d44a26984", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ad34182-5d1f-4555-a96e-779fb9bb042f"}}
{"id": "d2f5831cff100a8e", "prompt": "Show me the commit where the QUERY method support was added.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show the diff for the router changes associated with that feature."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d2f5831cff100a8e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:0b8106408031", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47444c37-1ec2-43bb-b542-39eaa7f4ff18"}}
{"id": "96a586174a2eaf9e", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of rewriting `render/json.go` but it's a mess right now. Stash my current progress so I can switch to the `master` branch to check something.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "96a586174a2eaf9e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:ddeb43a401b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a94ba29-a0a5-44f4-9832-afae8ca575bd"}}
{"id": "f0e38d8994694610", "prompt": "Update `go.mod` and run `go mod tidy` to resolve the dependency conflicts. It seems `golang.org/x/net` and `golang.org/x/text` need to be bumped to patched versions per recent commit `8dd2011`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Why did `go.mod` change like this?"}, {"prompt": "Can you explain the diff in `go.mod`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f0e38d8994694610", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:7fca7841fc9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2cacc494-abcd-4189-a708-c5fa8e4db275"}}
{"id": "ad2e0d5702cb2f56", "prompt": "What changed in the binding/ directory between the recent fix for BindXML and the update to the validator library?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ad2e0d5702cb2f56", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:02cb932b79ec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50a2eb3b-40ef-456c-88e6-1cb9f9c40975"}}
{"id": "4e84cbd1dde5e499", "prompt": "I'm seeing a warning in `go.mod` about `github.com/quic-go/quic-go`. Can you check the official GitHub releases page for that package? I noticed commit `b52df1f` bumped it to v0.60.0. Is there a specific breaking change in their API that we need to address in `response_writer.go` or `routergroup.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4e84cbd1dde5e499", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:98b17988bead", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e26d6a52-e7b0-464f-bd0b-ad10b4c3d5d6"}}
{"id": "4e191469da88e4b4", "prompt": "Explain the flow of the `recovery` middleware in `recovery.go`. How does it capture panics and attach them to `c.Errors`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4e191469da88e4b4", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:b04b3f98627f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b349fbc-5689-4ea8-b05e-7e3f377dadde"}}
{"id": "d6415229112003e4", "prompt": "Start the server in the background using gin.go so I can test the new QUERY method support manually.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wait 5 seconds, then curl localhost:8080/test?foo=bar to check if it responds"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d6415229112003e4", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:8eb52c7c572d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2054a40c-5e3a-4bf9-8bc5-a58a6fe8498f"}}
{"id": "38c835a100be2ebd", "prompt": "Parse `CHANGELOG.md` and count the number of Bug Fixes vs Features in the last 50 entries. Output the stats as a small JSON object.\n\nAlso, identify the most recent version tag mentioned in the file.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Extract the list of all PR numbers referenced in the last 10 bug fixes."}, {"prompt": "Create a summary of the top 3 categories of bugs fixed recently."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "38c835a100be2ebd", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:3d566534fee4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b492e2c2-f5cd-4eab-a3aa-c2e1b60bebf1"}}
{"id": "68f405b70c30e825", "prompt": "Check if we can upgrade github.com/stretchr/testify to a newer version. Check go.mod first and see if any tests might break if we bump it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "68f405b70c30e825", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gin:5fc0251e8828", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6db860e0-61d2-40af-bd3c-ac3553cd0b63"}}
{"id": "9e3511787fde33a0", "prompt": "I'm reviewing the changes in `tree.go` and `routergroup.go` related to the new QUERY method support (commit `2a1a14f`). Can you check the IETF RFC 10008 documentation for the HTTP QUERY method? I need to understand if there are any specific restrictions on the request body or headers that we should enforce in our router implementation to stay compliant.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a check in `routergroup.go` to ensure QUERY requests aren't treated as standard GETs in terms of caching middleware."}, {"prompt": "Update the README to mention QUERY method support and its limitations."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9e3511787fde33a0", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:707f0fdd5c8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01cb48c3-94d3-4eab-b92c-30e6d9b6aad4"}}
{"id": "7ad1bffeeabfaca4", "prompt": "I'm seeing some confusion in the docs. Can you update the comment in `binding/xml.go` to ensure it correctly reflects how `BindXML` works, similar to the recent fix in `binding/form.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ad1bffeeabfaca4", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:9214640d87da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3ba1a22-5872-4c57-99c4-9b29493bbbb2"}}
{"id": "e574e5b4ec41c34c", "prompt": "bump the version number in version.go", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the CHANGELOG.md to reflect this version change"}, {"prompt": "Commit the version bump"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e574e5b4ec41c34c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:403871c69aa8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99f691e2-3c79-49b7-ac94-dba1bb82d473"}}
{"id": "1d33e27fb715f563", "prompt": "새로운 개발자를 위해 `binding/` 디렉토리에 있는 다양한 바인딩 방식(JSON, XML, YAML, Msgpack 등)에 대한 설명과 사용 예시를 문서화해줘. README에 링크로 걸 수 있게 정리해주면 좋겠어.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1d33e27fb715f563", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:47c46c67c3b4", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e62ae53c-9c6f-40d1-8a37-5f429d57d804"}}
{"id": "12a49ed59333255a", "prompt": "I need to understand how JSON binding is initialized. Where is the default validator registered and what file implements the `default_validator` struct?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "12a49ed59333255a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:22a93ccde3b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c5cb8336-66ff-43af-8666-2058cd62921c"}}
{"id": "a55cd481d24f1104", "prompt": "Start the server in the background on port 8080. I need to smoke test the /ping endpoint while I do other things.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if curl localhost:8080/ping returns 200 OK."}, {"prompt": "Kill the process when I say so."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a55cd481d24f1104", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:6a9b96709a72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "235526bf-3a16-49ac-9bd2-10585ed91bce"}}
{"id": "710b5d5a955c9ace", "prompt": "Necesitas una aclaración sobre el método QUERY que añadieron recientemente (`feat(router): add QUERY method shortcut`). Según el RFC 10008 oficial, este método es opcional pero cada vez más usado. ¿Puedes buscar la explicación oficial de este RFC y decirme cómo Gin lo implementa en `routergroup.go`? Quiero saber si estamos siguiendo estrictamente la especificación o si hay alguna consideración de seguridad que la documentación del RFC mencione y debamos reflejar en nuestros middlewares.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "710b5d5a955c9ace", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:8b5fd1f8446c", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c93fe12-b509-4308-bae2-68535faf88f5"}}
{"id": "800a3f629bcc5f1d", "prompt": "Oye, estoy revisando `auth.go` y `ginS/gins.go`. La documentación oficial de Gin recomienda no usar el paquete `ginS` en producción por problemas de race condition. ¿Podrías buscar en la sección de 'Best Practices' o 'Migration Guides' de la web oficial de Gin cuál es el enfoque moderno recomendado para la inicialización global? Necesito saber si debo migrar a un patrón de inyección de dependencias o si hay una forma más segura de mantener el singleton global actual.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "800a3f629bcc5f1d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:f542e2577524", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1ed3667-fb2b-4891-8f4a-48c61dd948d0"}}
{"id": "ce60da2dc70e0114", "prompt": "I'm running the integration tests. Let me know when the test database container is ready so I can trigger the suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ce60da2dc70e0114", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:24e051da707b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef3593a6-ab5d-48a0-a712-1f3f1bc26e5c"}}
{"id": "1eb6f915bd8876b0", "prompt": "I need to experiment with a new way of handling `binding/form.go` but I don't want to mess up my current work. Create a branch `experiment/form-binding` and move my current uncommitted changes over there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1eb6f915bd8876b0", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:c8cd89ca8955", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "630e2ddf-ea89-4779-b166-a749d4a7f9cf"}}
{"id": "2e465f0b974eb045", "prompt": "Run `make build` and ensure the project compiles cleanly. If there are any errors, paste them here so I can see what's broken.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2e465f0b974eb045", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:686357a86d94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40468e8d-2c72-48ca-97d2-f61140c4ab2a"}}
{"id": "1ddc7969bf6e7649", "prompt": "binding/form_mapping.go: The `mapForm` function seems to silently skip fields that fail binding validation instead of returning an error. This causes issues where my struct has required fields, but the request body is missing them and I get a partially filled struct.\n\nLook at the binding test files to see expected behavior. I think we need to return a binding.ErrMissingKey or similar when a field is required but not found in the form.\n\nFix the mapping logic to respect validation errors.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1ddc7969bf6e7649", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:390304a73b12", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02292804-e3ed-47fc-9808-c0735213487b"}}
{"id": "f7638cf0cc0ade11", "prompt": "show me the diff for commit 1bd0ecf", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7638cf0cc0ade11", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:45e9d819ee70", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a840a30c-7b67-4b4a-a086-bc9800b1ed94"}}
{"id": "d21e0ae929d1dc69", "prompt": "We need to ensure we aren't logging sensitive data. Scan `logger.go` and `errors.go`. Specifically, look at how `c.Errors` are processed and printed. Are there any structs in `binding` or `context` that might contain PII or credentials (like authorization tokens in headers) that get accidentally serialized into the error logs? Also, check `auth.go` if it exists or is part of the middleware stack to see if headers are logged.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d21e0ae929d1dc69", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:73ce7bd36ae2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75d91e59-3264-4d93-a5f6-199e5a649048"}}
{"id": "06f918317d31242e", "prompt": "I'm getting a panic about slice overflow in the router. The commit 3b08cd7 mentions 'reset skipped-nodes stack'. Can you point me to the specific code in tree.go where this stack is managed and where the reset happens?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Look at the related test in tree_test.go that reproduces this overflow scenario."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "06f918317d31242e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:be9303d2f83c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d638abc4-5b4c-4b45-921a-f319546748ee"}}
{"id": "9827f90957f98adc", "prompt": "Check if there are any local processes running on port 8080 so I can start the Gin server without a conflict.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Kill the process running on 8080 so I can run the tests clean."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9827f90957f98adc", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:91387098fc5f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7b873c2b-c0ac-4a90-ade6-c2fd418dc784"}}
{"id": "6a206093170f0755", "prompt": "The recent security patches for `x/crypto` and `golang.org/x/net` need to be fully verified. Please:\n\n1. Verify that the dependency bumps in `go.mod` are correctly applied and don't break our internal `auth.go` logic.\n2. Run the full integration test suite (`gin_integration_test.go`) to ensure no regression in the middleware stack.\n3. Check `recovery.go` to ensure that the panic recording into `c.Errors` (from commit 4a3eb31) is working as expected and not leaking sensitive stack trace data to the client.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6a206093170f0755", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:5ad471ef3741", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8e45df95-ad81-402e-b320-cba16c7032bf"}}
{"id": "e27f728c29f1f9fd", "prompt": "The new QUERY method support (RFC 10008) seems broken. When I try to register a handler like this:\n\n```go\ngin.GET(\"/search\", ...)   // Works\ngin.QUERY(\"/search\", ...) // Compile error: undefined: gin.QUERY\n```\n\nI saw commit `5b141df` and `2a1a14f` mentioning QUERY method support. However, looking at `gin.go`, I don't see `QUERY` added to the `Method` constants or the router shortcuts. Please add the `QUERY` method support to the main router shortcuts in `gin.go` and `routergroup.go` so it behaves like `GET`, `POST`, etc.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e27f728c29f1f9fd", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:263040eb1371", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40eb13ac-8ce8-4d2c-b2c9-d02552c205a9"}}
{"id": "205b7b7b0997058f", "prompt": "The recovery middleware isn't catching panics raised during file uploads. I'm getting a 500 error instead of the recovery page when `SaveUploadedFile` fails in `context.go`. Here is a snippet of the panic:\n\npanic: write /tmp/upload: permission denied\n\nIt seems `default_validator.go` is interfering with the error handling chain. Can you ensure the Recovery middleware wraps the upload handlers properly?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also add a test case for this in `recovery_test.go`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "205b7b7b0997058f", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:d9428744676d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cc0d0be2-26aa-4f49-a2db-0ea3094b7eae"}}
{"id": "809832ae336dc63d", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing some weird 504s in production when we hit external APIs. Can you just curl the endpoint myapp.internal/api/health for me and show me the raw response headers? I suspect it's a timeout issue with the underlying http.Server configuration.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "809832ae336dc63d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:903df7838321", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a43e5033-eb27-43a7-b311-13e1348cfee6"}}
{"id": "ebd7da9f65c8a431", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of YAML configs in the root directory. Can you check `.golangci.yml` and `codecov.yml` to see if there are any deprecated fields or configuration drift?\n\nSpecifically, compare the linter settings in `.golangci.yml` against the latest recommended schema for golangci-lint v1.50+.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ebd7da9f65c8a431", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:1178cc27d0f9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26467d9e-7422-47da-b0fa-2e4a9e88e9ad"}}
{"id": "bc652d42e5e61d1d", "prompt": "show the last 5 commits that touched the render/ folder", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc652d42e5e61d1d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gin:3f210620b91d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b67efa9-7242-4b1b-8e96-4c17d61de846"}}
{"id": "cf25400f384e3558", "prompt": "The `Context.Copy()` method doesn't seem to be copying the `Errors` slice correctly when I use it in a middleware chain. Looking at recent commits, I see #4695 fixed this, but my local build (based on commit 1bd0ecf) still behaves oddly. \n\nHere is the snippet:\n\n```go\nfunc MyMiddleware(c *gin.Context) {\n    c.Error(errors.New(\"middleware error 1\"))\n    nc := c.Copy()\n    nc.Next()\n    fmt.Println(len(nc.Errors)) // Prints 0, expected 1\n}\n```\n\nIs the mutex locking in `loadKeys` interfering with error propagation? Please check `context.go` and ensure `Copy()` properly deep copies the `Errors` slice while holding the necessary locks.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check if `Accepted` headers are copied correctly in the same fix?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf25400f384e3558", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:d284843c1f02", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0168228-27d8-4109-b8ed-355b9841e0dc"}}
{"id": "95e4cc9fd30614ef", "prompt": "benchmarks_test.go is failing with 'undefined: httprouter'. Can you check why the build is failing?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Fix it by updating dependencies in go.mod"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "95e4cc9fd30614ef", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:294323d4d3a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ab8840ef-2024-4e6e-b05b-9d7fd21eedf2"}}
{"id": "c19a1894e1b4c021", "prompt": "Run the benchmarks for the JSON binding package. I want to compare the performance of `go_json` vs `jsoniter` before we merge the codec changes. Execute `go test -bench=BenchmarkJsonBinding -benchmem ./codec/json/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c19a1894e1b4c021", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:371cd8c9bdd7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d64f8465-f296-42ed-bf7c-64f4ae38805f"}}
{"id": "393366c8d016e55e", "prompt": "Can you find the PID of the process that's currently holding the lock on the Makefile?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "393366c8d016e55e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:cf2f0f90a7e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f8acb93-0ae5-4318-98f5-fcd93a3c5b26"}}
{"id": "f666e32cb69f2e44", "prompt": "Run `golangci-lint run` on the repository. Please fix any errors it reports, but ignore warnings. If it fails to run, let me know.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if the tests still pass after the fixes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f666e32cb69f2e44", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:563c4ee2123b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9176bde-e08f-4399-b11e-a94a77780f8b"}}
{"id": "75cec70dbc98a7dc", "prompt": "Wait until the `go.mod` file stops being modified by the dependency update script before I try to run `go mod tidy`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "75cec70dbc98a7dc", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gin:b63913b8cc4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8ff4916-b4d2-46de-9e2d-4ae8318381ac"}}
{"id": "8fe4ac40ab086971", "prompt": "The `render` package has a lot of repetitive code in each file (json.go, xml.go, yaml.go, etc.). They all implement a similar `Render` struct and `WriteContentType` method. Can you extract this into a common helper function or interface in `render/render.go` to DRY this up? Look at `json.go` and `xml.go` as examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8fe4ac40ab086971", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:e294815aa346", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "41084456-e6d1-452d-8b99-0d0d0b659a43"}}
{"id": "0e52b1b68ce8fd1b", "prompt": "which test file covers the router group logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e52b1b68ce8fd1b", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:53eb7c9e88e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bba66d5-7f5e-4596-9330-c07ecb0fd67a"}}
{"id": "63dc1421a5353fe2", "prompt": "I need to find all usages of `bytesconv` in the repo. It's in internal/bytesconv but where is it actually called?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there benchmarks for this?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63dc1421a5353fe2", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:a073e74febec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "484621e0-d88f-42d7-acb6-d4bfea9cc89a"}}
{"id": "347cc612bd3ed2d7", "prompt": "Regarding JSON rendering in render/json.go, why are there multiple implementations like jsoniter, sonic, and go_json alongside the standard 'encoding/json'? How do I switch between them, and does it require code changes or just dependency updates?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "347cc612bd3ed2d7", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:4bc185304ebb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d82904a-31c0-453e-8114-6afd5d30cc81"}}
{"id": "571847d5f569cbb9", "prompt": "There's a build artifact `gin.binary` in the root that I keep forgetting to commit. Add it to `.gitignore`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "571847d5f569cbb9", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:a5873a600a07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3276e1a8-ea0d-4734-ba96-890dbcb1b44d"}}
{"id": "3ce1bb1eae82dcd6", "prompt": "I need to verify that the new QUERY method support is working. Can you run the specific test case for it? It should be in gin_test.go or routes_test.go.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ce1bb1eae82dcd6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:b41d31cb3c3f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adc53695-22af-4388-861a-e4c6bf78fcdc"}}
{"id": "2ec371488bd27683", "prompt": "I just merged #4854 but my local CI is failing on the context tests. Can you run `go test -run TestContextCopyKeys` and let me know the output? I need to verify if the mutex lock is actually working in my environment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2ec371488bd27683", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:0332ae118579", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89619ee7-9f6d-4b08-85a8-a4b0c2dba048"}}
{"id": "e46ad3e3b3a9bfb8", "prompt": "Is the main gin-gonic website currently up? Can you screenshot gin-gonic.com/main and show me if the 'Gin 1.12.0' announcement banner is visible? I want to make sure the blog post is actually linked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e46ad3e3b3a9bfb8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:8dc5522546a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26e14fb6-4a31-476a-b923-458f7f192a81"}}
{"id": "62f18e852e9dab23", "prompt": "We need to prepare for RFC 10008 compliance. \n1. Verify the implementation of the new `QUERY` method in `routergroup.go` and `gin.go`.\n2. Add a new test case in `routes_test.go` that specifically uses the `QUERY` method to ensure it routes correctly.\n3. Update the documentation in `README.md` to mention support for the QUERY method.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "62f18e852e9dab23", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:e4687e894938", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "510c04b5-83ff-4cdb-8973-97942324d3be"}}
{"id": "9146d6c24c3ea0ea", "prompt": "Look up the latest docs for `github.com/go-playground/validator`. We're using it in `binding/default_validator.go`. There's a new error handling feature in v10.30.3 mentioned in commit `03f3e42`. Does the official documentation recommend catching specific error types now, or should we stick to string matching in `binding/validate_test.go`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9146d6c24c3ea0ea", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:c8a51b7acefe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59eb2a5f-3f9e-42a2-af83-fd9b79851528"}}
{"id": "4b0fd79cf24c98ca", "prompt": "I want to improve our support for RFC 10008. Please:\n\n- Implement the `QUERY` method support in the router, following the pattern used for other standard methods.\n- Add a shortcut for the `QUERY` method in the main `gin.go` engine API.\n- Update `routes_test.go` to include test cases for the new `QUERY` method to ensure routing works correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4b0fd79cf24c98ca", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:291aeaff51fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afde9070-5d7e-4e2e-a636-f0b5616e75ac"}}
{"id": "ac879534d5689a14", "prompt": "Estoy depurando un error en `render/json.go`. Cuando usamos `sonic` o `jsoniter` como backend, a veces los tiempos de serialización varían drásticamente. Quiero consultar la documentación de `github.com/bytedance/sonic` para entender qué configuraciones de rendimiento recomiendan para cargas de trabajo de alta concurrencia. ¿Hay alguna configuración específica que debamos pasar al `New` factory de `codec/json/sonic.go` para optimizar el uso de memoria?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac879534d5689a14", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:e22b7d928de7", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6413908-8e1b-4695-9630-3b106b16784a"}}
{"id": "3baf9d9006a69359", "prompt": "방금 실수로 `context.go` 수정한 거 다 되돌리고 싶어. 마지막 커밋 상태로 복구해줘.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "아니, 커밋은 하지 말고 그냥 stash에 넣어뒀다가 나중에 꺼낼 수 있게 해줘."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3baf9d9006a69359", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gin:b28c44db2783", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70bdc10a-5451-43cc-9ac4-e663057e60a5"}}
{"id": "9947fdc12e433004", "prompt": "Where is the ginS singleton instance defined and how do the convenience functions in ginS/gins.go delegate to the main engine? I'm trying to debug why my global handler isn't being picked up.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9947fdc12e433004", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:a1c9607c8530", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28b44150-a4d3-4796-b241-0449d94da4ca"}}
{"id": "bd07320d7d41c186", "prompt": "I'm reviewing the recent commits and see \"fix(engine): add default ReadHeaderTimeout to http.Server in Run methods\". Before I upgrade, I need to understand *why* this was necessary. Is there a specific DoS vector or standard library behavior change that Gin is trying to mitigate by enforcing this timeout? Does this apply to `RunTLS` as well?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If I set my own ReadHeaderTimeout in my custom http.Server, will Gin override it or respect my value?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bd07320d7d41c186", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:ff1f63a2fb72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5aa3e19f-3bb9-4dfa-a99e-2a021d768342"}}
{"id": "4bd1d56e2905dedb", "prompt": "I need to verify if the HTTP QUERY method support (RFC 10008) is actually live in the latest release. Can you hit the gin-gonic demo server at gin-gonic.com/demo and try a query method request? I need to know if the framework is publicly exposing this feature yet.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If it's not live, check the GitHub issues for 'HTTP QUERY' to see if there's a milestone for it."}, {"prompt": "Also, look up the current version in go.mod and compare it against the tag on GitHub to ensure we're not running a local fork."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4bd1d56e2905dedb", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:5edfc8e160ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3ba7ab87-4434-4798-bb5e-395e4b7d02f8"}}
{"id": "ae76457d3709343d", "prompt": "add a .gitignore entry for all build artifacts (*.exe, *.out, etc)", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ae76457d3709343d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:9b1fe9963e07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8877ea1-c5f6-49a1-8e56-b74b164d8100"}}
{"id": "3c7b8285ac5c439b", "prompt": "There's a `Makefile` at the root. I want to ensure the `build` target doesn't accidentally include test files or unnecessary assets. \n\nCheck if any untracked files are listed in `.gitignore` that shouldn't be, or vice versa. Specifically look for any build artifacts left in `bin/` or `dist/` if they exist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c7b8285ac5c439b", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:6e041313b5c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c878688-c3a4-44bb-b4a4-d789cfc4e2ab"}}
{"id": "ea55b65997f64053", "prompt": "The `Copy` method in `context.go` was recently modified to load Keys under a mutex. However, looking at the implementation, it only copies the `Keys` map but misses copying the `Errors` and `Accepted` slices. This is the root cause of issue #4695. Please refactor `context.go` to ensure that `Copy()` correctly clones `Errors` and `Accepted` in addition to `Keys`. Also update `context_test.go` to cover these fields.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ea55b65997f64053", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:76e6ca9270d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a6884b0-9280-4f6d-a62e-17bbeb823083"}}
{"id": "dccb4777010db49f", "prompt": "There's a CVE-2024-27369 reported in golang.org/x/net. Can you pull the latest advisory from http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-27369 to see if it affects the version pinned in our go.mod? I need the description and CVSS score.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dccb4777010db49f", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gin:a5a51f62f2f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbc7f36c-1e80-4f4a-a3ee-53e6e0f17e4e"}}
{"id": "c8b038d1c674121f", "prompt": "The recovery middleware seems to be swallowing errors instead of logging them to c.Errors. See recent commit 4a3eb31. Can you verify if c.Errors is actually populated in the current master branch?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c8b038d1c674121f", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:88fd4f5e0e30", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ae3e1b77-a1c0-45a0-a4c9-d4b41ffa3b33"}}
{"id": "f6faef71a93edc3c", "prompt": "make sure the project builds correctly with go build", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6faef71a93edc3c", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gin:6e411ffb19a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a74313d-61a3-4b36-b6af-139c895ec250"}}
{"id": "91dfde8f88853efc", "prompt": "Look at `context.go`. There's a lot of boilerplate in the `ShouldBind`, `ShouldBindJSON`, `ShouldBindXML`, etc. methods. They all call `c.Bind()` or similar internal methods. Can you refactor this to use a single internal `bindWith` helper that takes the binding engine as an argument, reducing code duplication?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "91dfde8f88853efc", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:a2e6bc8a19ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7d785e9-181f-4ab7-b78e-05e22ec6a706"}}
{"id": "a08c7956f59267ab", "prompt": "I'm looking at `binding/multipart_form_mapping.go` and seeing how file uploads are handled. The standard library's `MultipartForm` struct changed slightly in Go 1.21 regarding memory buffers. Can you check the official Go docs for `mime/multipart` to see if there are any new recommendations for handling large file uploads to avoid OOMs? I want to make sure our `SaveUploadedFile` implementation in `context.go` aligns with current best practices.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a08c7956f59267ab", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:1f004c3a3c40", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87aeee98-66f7-44f3-8389-7bc61289722f"}}
{"id": "8b98fc5727a9f54d", "prompt": "I'm seeing some potential issues with how `SaveUploadedFile` handles permissions. Can you add a new parameter to `SaveUploadedFile` in `context.go` to allow specifying file permissions, or at least suggest where to implement it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b98fc5727a9f54d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:5225688e79fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8394c118-c61e-45be-a914-a0aaf2f55aca"}}
{"id": "22aefb50a4c39b9a", "prompt": "The .golangci.yml configuration is causing local linters to fail. Can you audit this file and ensure all enabled linters actually exist in the current `go.mod` dependencies? Also, please check if the `govet` check configuration is valid according to the latest golangci-lint schema.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22aefb50a4c39b9a", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gin:4fb21904bd4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af63082d-fa1f-4937-a17a-9c4a7714d3bc"}}
{"id": "20c08f94a0298e32", "prompt": "In the Gin framework, how does the Copy() method on *Context work? I noticed in recent commits there was a fix regarding copying Errors and Accepted fields. Does it also deep copy the Keys map, and are there any thread-safety concerns I should be aware of when using c.Copy() in a goroutine?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "20c08f94a0298e32", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:a07af354d1c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb01c358-e2c8-40c0-b50b-8e357050837b"}}
{"id": "a747608b482643be", "prompt": "I need to understand how the framework handles context copying. Specifically, where is the `Copy()` method defined and what fields does it copy? Is the `Errors` field included?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it handle the `Accepted` field as well?"}, {"prompt": "Why was the mutex lock added in recent commits for Keys?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a747608b482643be", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:d4643a8899b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6c69570-d4f4-4e37-a7de-7676ed5cd062"}}
{"id": "ba418d0a4c50ae5e", "prompt": "The integration tests are flaking on CI. Run gin_integration_test.go -v -race -count=3 to see if I can reproduce the panic locally.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If it panics, show me the stack trace."}, {"prompt": "If it passes, try running it 5 more times."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba418d0a4c50ae5e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:77fe3c8bbb87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "556712ba-1c0e-4d3c-9edb-f72c1d0f97d6"}}
{"id": "8b760aa9045a5e03", "prompt": "release notes 초안 좀 써줘. 주요 변경사항으로 RFC 10008 지원, context.Copy() 성능/안정성 개선, 그리고 recovery 미들웨어의 에러 기록 로직 개선을 포함해줘.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "기술적인 디테일보다는 개발자들이 이 업데이트를 왜 써야 하는지에 집중해서 작성해줘."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b760aa9045a5e03", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:8f056265abbc", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93c39b44-339e-45d6-a598-f45f751492f1"}}
{"id": "6becbea1843290e0", "prompt": "We need to perform some maintenance across the core and binding packages. Please do the following:\n1. Review `binding/json.go` and `binding/xml.go` to ensure they are using the updated validator version (10.30.3) correctly.\n2. Check `render/json.go` and `render/xml.go` for any inconsistencies in how they handle empty response bodies.\n3. Run the tests for everything in the `binding/` directory and report if any failures occur with the new validator.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6becbea1843290e0", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gin:6f6132916499", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b2c6e60f-ae76-460e-a632-d7cd1b4a0aac"}}
{"id": "bb3a281839a193d1", "prompt": "can you track down the origin of the panic mentioned in #4818? I saw a fix in 3b08cd7 that resets a skipped-nodes stack. Where is that stack managed and what triggers the slice overflow?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bb3a281839a193d1", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:1103b4cb9850", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "826d86a7-644e-4d47-af64-4b981c221cef"}}
{"id": "eac0883ef38c6345", "prompt": "binding/json.go is using the standard encoding/json package. Our benchmarks show that switching to jsoniter would give us a 2x speedup.\n\nI see there's a codec/json/ directory with jsoniter.go and sonic.go. Can you wire up jsoniter as the preferred JSON codec for the binding package?\n\nI want to update go.mod to use jsoniter and make BindingJSON use the jsoniter marshaller by default instead of the standard library one.\n\nLet me know if there are any breaking changes we need to document in CHANGELOG.md.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eac0883ef38c6345", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gin:89d6e6b245d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6cd24051-01bb-41c4-b9a1-10735a610c47"}}
{"id": "d65de0c7c25623f6", "prompt": "README.md에 HTTP QUERY 메서드 지원(RFC 10008)에 대한 내용을 추가해줘. 최근에 feat(router): add QUERY method shortcut 추가된 거 있잖아.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d65de0c7c25623f6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gin:50a4dd921f3f", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7033c059-a4c3-4940-b882-c0c7c35b89f4"}}
{"id": "5dc1bdcfcead4ce6", "prompt": "Triage this Snyk finding:\n\nVulnerability: GO-2023-XXXX in golang.org/x/net\nSeverity: HIGH\nPath: github.com/gin-gonic/gin -> golang.org/x/net -> ...\n\nThe latest commit log shows we already bumped golang.org/x/net to v0.55.0 in `34dac20`. Is this finding stale? If so, verify `go.sum` reflects the correct patch version for x/net and x/text mentioned in `8dd2011`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5dc1bdcfcead4ce6", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:192002c6f2b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9384a528-0bb0-44e5-8f88-e94e941ee447"}}
{"id": "a1d6bafe8f218cde", "prompt": "Why is there a mutex being used in context.go for the Copy method? I saw a recent commit 1bd0ecf mentioning loading Keys under the mutex.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a1d6bafe8f218cde", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:e4640e1985ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f480b31-ed4f-4048-97e7-bf1457313430"}}
{"id": "65d5fe2250e86ba5", "prompt": "Run the benchmark for form mapping. I want to compare performance against the master branch.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "65d5fe2250e86ba5", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:a58564e09196", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e7c83cf5-f723-462f-a6ab-20df3c32abc8"}}
{"id": "7068d0ffa50f33df", "prompt": "The `render/json.go` file uses `jsoniter` if available. Can you check the `json-iter/go` repository for the latest configuration options? I want to know if they recommend enabling `UseNumber()` globally to preserve integer precision in our `codec/json/jsoniter.go` wrapper. Also, check if there's a performance benchmark update we should be aware of.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7068d0ffa50f33df", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:16aa02a862e9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bed5f0f7-12a2-45eb-90cf-51b486f9b741"}}
{"id": "76a093272c5724c0", "prompt": "In `render/json.go`, rename the internal helper function `writeJSON` to `encodeJSON` and update all references in that file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "76a093272c5724c0", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gin:2188445b5d0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afd03d1b-8b8e-47fc-84ed-79e1439cbe88"}}
{"id": "1df71b352d40b3c8", "prompt": "I noticed we're using an older version of golang.org/x/net. Can you check the latest version and see what needs to change in go.mod to update it? Also, check if there are any breaking changes in the recent security advisories for x/net.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1df71b352d40b3c8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gin:8939bb1ac675", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "15a6263b-23b4-4736-b82e-7353b88b7e5b"}}
{"id": "46cef370a15844e7", "prompt": "Look at `recovery.go`. When a panic occurs, how exactly is it being recorded into `c.Errors`? I want to make sure it's following the pattern from the recent fix in commit 4a3eb31.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this also capture the stack trace, or just the error message?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "46cef370a15844e7", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:be7339635b3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "efd27467-9bd5-4c9e-9e14-eba807c64f3d"}}
{"id": "6f2939326f352ee8", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of `go_json` and `jsoniter` options in the codec/json directory. When we say Gin supports multiple JSON encoders, does the framework switch between them automatically or do I need to recompile? What are the trade-offs of using sonic over the standard encoding/json?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f2939326f352ee8", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gin:afad4bd974aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02b35103-b0b5-48b2-b9c3-2ea41d998208"}}
{"id": "f25e0e3bd3f41339", "prompt": "Run a static analysis pass over `tree.go` and `router*.go`. I'm worried about potential integer overflows or index-out-of-bounds errors in the radix tree implementation, especially given the fix `3b08cd7` about resetting skipped-nodes stack. Are there any other places where slice operations assume specific lengths without bounds checking?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f25e0e3bd3f41339", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gin:599a9b07301a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40e0be39-5031-43ac-96be-4e42bde8a443"}}
{"id": "5c85525ba06a1a94", "prompt": "show me the implementation of the recovery middleware in recovery.go and explain how it records panics into c.Errors.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5c85525ba06a1a94", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:805ce5601fcf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec12706a-77f6-4565-8954-d2849b5a3fa2"}}
{"id": "b44b579d614d1382", "prompt": "Check the `ginS` package documentation or the main Gin README. I see `ginS` is deprecated in `deprecated.go`. What does the official migration guide suggest for moving from the global `gin.S` instance to the standard `gin.Default()` pattern? I need to update the examples in `examples/README.md` to reflect this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b44b579d614d1382", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gin:8ed996f9d498", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "76762ddb-f476-4b89-903d-f8cc99bd9a2f"}}
{"id": "d547921dcf5a6b4e", "prompt": "In `gin.go`, how is the `Run` method implemented? I specifically want to know how it sets up the `http.Server` and if it's using the default `ReadHeaderTimeout` mentioned in the recent commits.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if there's a way to configure the timeout manually in the engine struct."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d547921dcf5a6b4e", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gin:74031d5edfc5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "599fc330-62cb-42ea-8224-a3fe8ec927c7"}}
{"id": "9db268b256e4cea5", "prompt": "grep for \"QUERY\" in the repo. I saw a commit about RFC 10008 support. I want to know where the new HTTP method shortcut is defined and which test file covers it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if this new method is also available in the RouterGroup struct."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9db268b256e4cea5", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gin:48b46cfc52cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe32255c-8cf1-4ecd-8908-e2da56b3a9b8"}}
{"id": "0ee580f4c0b2cc5d", "prompt": "I'm seeing a slice overflow panic in the router when `getValue` is called on certain malformed paths. The recent commit 3b08cd7 fixed this by resetting the skipped-nodes stack. I want to make sure this pattern is consistent. Please audit `tree.go` and ensure that any other places traversing the radix tree handle the skipped-nodes stack correctly. Specifically, look at `insert` and `delete` methods to see if they need similar safeguards.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find any other risky traversal patterns, fix them too."}, {"prompt": "Run the benchmarks to check if this stack reset adds significant overhead."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ee580f4c0b2cc5d", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gin:32ef57cf1016", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f61bef34-2702-4c0d-b3c7-92a461dcb9e1"}}
{"id": "133d8ff847f91941", "prompt": "Run golangci-lint on the binding/ package. We have a lot of new validation logic there and I want to clean up any style issues before merging.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "133d8ff847f91941", "repo": "gin", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gin:4888f8277f93", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gin-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b8ca3090-6824-4bdd-888d-78fc207be57d"}}
{"id": "04257dd27480de64", "prompt": "We need to update the minimum Android API level to 24 as per #3085. Please check all usages of APIs that are deprecated or removed in API 24 across the main `gson` module. Specifically look at `ReflectionAccessFilterHelper`, `UnsafeAllocator`, and any SQL type handling. Update the `animal-sniffer` configuration in `pom.xml` if needed and ensure `SqlTypesGsonTest` still works.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "04257dd27480de64", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:feada46793cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "452684bd-1d83-4642-bae4-e2cc93c5fdc3"}}
{"id": "491dc2b8d7801de4", "prompt": "Compare the GsonDesignDocument.md with the current state of the README.md. How has the documentation evolved?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "491dc2b8d7801de4", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:8993309ae198", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9df7cd7-758d-47bf-9ca9-b6ef99343ccb"}}
{"id": "4fc3296bfdeeb986", "prompt": "Check if there are any hung Java processes running on this machine that might be holding onto port 8080. If so, show me the PIDs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4fc3296bfdeeb986", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:b782cf032c90", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70d48451-991a-4d56-8ad3-893366a41480"}}
{"id": "f821644ac36799c6", "prompt": "帮我统计一下 gson 主模块下 Java 代码的行数，排除测试代码。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f821644ac36799c6", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:2a503f182e71", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f56b5b96-4a49-4dbc-999a-a4d86e96daa2"}}
{"id": "085072f536e61147", "prompt": "Rename the `Strictness` class to `JsonStrictness` to make it more descriptive. Update all references across the repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "085072f536e61147", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:978711a1cd52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "989f46ee-4fab-412a-af9a-998b466f8b45"}}
{"id": "96305add715c3b62", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `JsonParser.parseReader`? I want to understand how it handles the stream state.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does it handle unexpected end-of-input tokens?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "96305add715c3b62", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:5a12f929b93e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d77151b1-193c-4950-9f0c-c8053cfd631a"}}
{"id": "05331eba6e1ab069", "prompt": "I'm getting a warning that Gson isn't recommended for Android. What exactly breaks if I use it with R8/shrinking? Is it just missing fields or does it crash at runtime?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "05331eba6e1ab069", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:b744d74700dd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "235233a9-6f54-4c2d-b8eb-2ac303344255"}}
{"id": "518d6040b00311c2", "prompt": "Delete `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/extras/examples/rawcollections/RawCollectionsExample.java`. It's unused.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "518d6040b00311c2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:99c0d5a558cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1f7796d-53fb-4f37-b663-5d59f0c78758"}}
{"id": "a6c9663c12912e8a", "prompt": "In `DefaultDateTypeAdapter` and `JavaTimeTypeAdapters`, we are using different date formats. The code in `ISO8601Utils` is referenced by the old adapter but not the new one. Can you refactor the date parsing logic in `DefaultDateTypeAdapter` to delegate to `ISO8601Utils` to remove duplication? We want to eventually deprecate the old adapter, but consistency is key first.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `DefaultDateTypeAdapterTest` covers all edge cases now."}, {"prompt": "Look at `UtcDateTypeAdapter` in extras to see if it should also use ISO8601Utils."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a6c9663c12912e8a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:1eb6085be40e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aecdfe1a-c947-4514-9847-73d5966d78c6"}}
{"id": "7e4c8061475fe1f4", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug a serialization issue where my `ExclusionStrategy` isn't being respected. I've implemented it and passed it to `GsonBuilder`. Can you check the official documentation for `ExclusionStrategy` to confirm if there are any threading requirements or if I need to register it differently than just passing it in the builder?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, check if there are known issues with `Expose` annotation conflicting with custom exclusion strategies."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7e4c8061475fe1f4", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:acf2647561cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c8ebc43-3d0a-4a85-9826-ba6e31fa5afd"}}
{"id": "30e7e4a83ec7bdcf", "prompt": "Verschiebe bitte alle Dateien aus dem Verzeichnis `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/interceptors/` in ein neues Unterverzeichnis `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/interceptors/internal/`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Vergiss nicht, die `package`-Deklarationen in den verschobenen Dateien anzupassen, damit sie zum neuen Pfad passen."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "30e7e4a83ec7bdcf", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:b4a09dd99e0c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "46ac8369-9875-4989-a391-5059a2406bcd"}}
{"id": "974e4bf84e03b94a", "prompt": "Fix the quadratic performance issue in `JsonArray` when large lists are being removed.\n\nI noticed a recent commit (#3115) mentioning avoiding quadratic `removeIf` behavior. However, I'm still seeing high CPU usage when filtering large JSON arrays. It seems the underlying `LinkedTreeMap` or `JsonArray` internal list implementation is being iterated inefficiently.\n\nPlease review `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonArray.java` and optimize the bulk removal logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "974e4bf84e03b94a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:6e67a14a1540", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c6690d9-c386-4fbc-b8f4-17023809309d"}}
{"id": "0a489609421e7117", "prompt": "The `JsonArray` list view implementation is causing O(N^2) performance issues with large arrays (10k+ items). \n\nI saw commit `115bcc7` mentions avoiding quadratic `removeIf` in `JsonArray` list views. We are calling `list.subList(0, size).removeIf(...)` on a large array and it's hanging.\n\nPlease verify if the fix covers the `subList` view specifically or just the direct removal. If it's still quadratic, we need a proper `ListIterator` implementation or a different underlying storage for removals.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0a489609421e7117", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:9d4e3e306bb6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1d6cc0a-377d-4c7b-9a91-df55318261b5"}}
{"id": "06d0a8d353d3ff92", "prompt": "I need to understand why `LongSerializationPolicy` exists. Show me every place `LongSerializationPolicy` is referenced in the codebase, especially in `GsonBuilder` and the actual serialization logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "06d0a8d353d3ff92", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:4fb2f5a60953", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1e39c5c-f334-47bd-9043-6a0eca9ce35f"}}
{"id": "d5954d6552126d97", "prompt": "Kannst du in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonParser.java` eine neue Methode hinzufügen, die einen String entgegennimmt und direkt ein `JsonElement` zurückgibt? Nenne sie `parseString`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Füge bitte auch einen passenden Unit-Test in `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/JsonParserTest.java` hinzu, um die neue Methode zu verifizieren."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5954d6552126d97", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:11afda9cc470", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d484161-92d8-4dc7-89c2-cafac954aa4b"}}
{"id": "e469b50360eb74a9", "prompt": "I'm getting an `IllegalStateException` when using ProGuard with Gson. Based on the README, it's likely field obfuscation. Can you search `test-shrinker` and `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson` for any existing proguard rules or logic that checks for accessibility? I need to know what's already covered so I don't break it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the content of `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro`."}, {"prompt": "What does `ReflectionAccessFilter` do?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e469b50360eb74a9", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:31fdab8fa092", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98389084-fe77-42df-a51d-681fa1bf6fde"}}
{"id": "a5846a1220064708", "prompt": "I'm trying to get this project to build with JDK 25. The recent commit 3f3a1ab mentions support, but my local build is failing. Can you check if there's a specific Maven profile or flag I need to use? Here is the error: [paste error stack trace]", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a5846a1220064708", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:37a9ce091e1b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "439ed781-f978-44cc-8b10-071743dad7eb"}}
{"id": "771e5c76fc29677f", "prompt": "Könntest du die Fehlermeldung in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonIOException.java` etwas präziser formulieren? Sie sollte explizit darauf hinweisen, dass ein Problem beim Lesen des JSON-Streams aufgetreten ist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "771e5c76fc29677f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:20f50aaab21c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d8aedf2-0654-4a97-a42b-5de736dee35f"}}
{"id": "9a9e35a9f58512d2", "prompt": "Can you run the ParseBenchmark and SerializationBenchmark? I'm seeing some regressions in our internal metrics dashboard after the JUnit 6 bump and I need to confirm if it's Gson-specific or something else.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, please compare the output against the baseline in metrics/src/main/java/com/google/gson/metrics/BagOfPrimitives.java"}, {"prompt": "If there's a >5% drop, let me know immediately. I need to decide whether to revert the bump."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9a9e35a9f58512d2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:8a511a882dec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e5ad341-63ea-4b7d-9321-daa156197b32"}}
{"id": "332815b7525d2338", "prompt": "I need a random 32-character hex string to use as a `DEV_AUTH_TOKEN` in my local environment. Just generate it for me.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you format it as a shell export command?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "332815b7525d2338", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:aa9b44300a1e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6ff4cf2-7bca-44fa-9200-241e3d6b81eb"}}
{"id": "6d0086c654fef24c", "prompt": "I'm trying to serialize a Java `Record` but Gson throws an exception because it can't find a no-args constructor.\n\n```\njava.lang.IllegalArgumentException: class com.example.User has no default constructor\n  at com.google.gson.internal.ConstructorConstructor$15.construct(ConstructorConstructor.java:327)\n```\n\nI know the README says Kotlin features aren't supported, but Java 14+ records are standard Java now. Can we add support for records in `ConstructorConstructor.java` by detecting them via `Class.isRecord()` and using the canonical constructor?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6d0086c654fef24c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:db841942fa8e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4e5c981-9988-4273-8712-cff44df34c48"}}
{"id": "2fe4be89cc0ac4ba", "prompt": "I'm seeing some concerns about the recent changes to how we handle primitives. Can you:\n\n1. Examine `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/Primitives.java` and ensure the `hashCode` implementations are consistent with the recent 'Improve readability' commit (3046).\n2. Check `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/PrimitiveTest.java` to make sure we have adequate coverage for both `Double` and `Long` edge cases.\n3. Look at `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/ToNumberStrategy.java` and see if the current implementation handles precision loss correctly for very large `Long` values being parsed as `Double`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any performance regressions in `Primitives.java` after the hashCode change?"}, {"prompt": "Should we add a new `ToNumberStrategy` for more strict floating point handling?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2fe4be89cc0ac4ba", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:3c7753991f47", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59f5dbb4-a278-4c2b-bfa5-79f956774b82"}}
{"id": "44da3537ea2f6aff", "prompt": "Who made the most recent changes to the `TypeAdapterFactory` class and what was the purpose?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "44da3537ea2f6aff", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:9265d4ce03f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f5cf4b3-9309-4117-8d60-34e94374e376"}}
{"id": "11b17ce8a706cb82", "prompt": "I need a quick pass over `proto/src/main/java/com/google/gson/protobuf/LegacyProtoTypeAdapterFactory.java` and its tests. Since this handles Protocol Buffers, it's parsing binary data. Are there any issues with buffer overflows or unchecked array indices when deserializing malformed proto messages? Also, check `test-graal-native-image`—are we exposing any reflection configuration that might be too broad for a GraalVM native image context?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If the reflection config is too broad, suggest how to tighten it in `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "11b17ce8a706cb82", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:a9eaad25e3b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "974c8964-9af0-4749-8712-eb638dbb3011"}}
{"id": "bae888b4b606eef2", "prompt": "Open an interactive zsh terminal session so I can debug the build environment manually.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bae888b4b606eef2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:c4d3eaef5235", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e77967a-bba2-49de-bf97-76faacef29e8"}}
{"id": "09461132b8f4a0a5", "prompt": "Hi, I'm seeing an `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` when trying to parse a malformed JSON string with `JsonParser` in strict mode. It seems like the error handling for unpaired surrogates (fix #3116) might be triggering too late or not correctly catching indices.\n\nHere is the stack trace:\n```\njava.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 5 out of bounds for length 5\n\tat com.google.gson.internal.bind.JsonTreeReader.parseString(JsonTreeReader.java:256)\n\tat com.google.gson.JsonParser.parse(JsonParser.java:120)\n```\n\nThe input string is `\"\\uD800\"`. Can you check if `JsonTreeReader` is correctly validating surrogate pairs before accessing the array?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "09461132b8f4a0a5", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:3afdd0e6aba0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfebad74-d634-4cd7-88fe-270fecf35f19"}}
{"id": "0b5335b3a131e3cc", "prompt": "Review the current dependencies in the project and see if any of them are redundant or if we can consolidate them. Specifically, look at how we handle testing dependencies across the different modules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b5335b3a131e3cc", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:e53c45a50970", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "91459d06-2188-4578-84a0-c9454514ec3d"}}
{"id": "783c7291e6f22104", "prompt": "What's the difference between ToNumberStrategy.LONG_AND_DOUBLE and ToNumberStrategy.DOUBLE_ONLY? I have a JSON payload with large integers that are getting truncated.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this affect the deserialization of primitive long fields too?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "783c7291e6f22104", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:428358a55547", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c163bda-8f61-4efd-88e5-c57dd5702112"}}
{"id": "d3817ba8b36765a1", "prompt": "I'm trying to use `GsonBuilder` with `setObjectToJsonAdapter` but it's not overriding the core type adapters for `Map`. \n\nI have a custom `MapTypeAdapterFactory` registered, but `TypeAdapters` are still using the default `LinkedTreeMap` behavior. \n\nCan you check `JsonAdapterAnnotationTypeAdapterFactory` or `TypeAdapters.java` to see if there's a precedence issue where core adapters are registered after user-provided factories? We need our custom adapter to win.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3817ba8b36765a1", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:ae537c7c1193", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0e3dc18c-6ace-4a6c-a47a-af1fa0d99117"}}
{"id": "31a1ec29f3ae0d70", "prompt": "The README mentions that Gson is in maintenance mode. Can you check `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/annotations/SerializedName.java` and `GsonDesignDocument.md` to see if there are any deprecated fields or methods related to serialization policy?\n\nAlso, count the total number of lines in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/Gson.java`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, while you're at it, can you extract the `test-shrinker/pom.xml` and tell me if it includes the `gson` artifact as a dependency or if it's just for testing?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "31a1ec29f3ae0d70", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:793dbc79de5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13b6cfb3-7a9e-4231-bbb0-7b99442589b2"}}
{"id": "6ee5130b57e9725f", "prompt": "I'm seeing `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` inside `JsonArray.remove(int)` when removing elements in a loop. Here is the stack trace:\n\n```java\njava.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1\n\tat com.google.gson.JsonArray.remove(JsonArray.java:124)\n\tat com.google.gson.JsonArrayTest$1.accept(JsonArrayTest.java:45)\n```\n\nIt seems like `removeIf` or similar iteration logic might be shifting indices incorrectly if we're manually tracking position. Can you check `JsonArray.java` and fix the removal logic to avoid this? It happens when removing multiple non-adjacent elements via a stream filter.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6ee5130b57e9725f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:240b572d2b9a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2d68d07-eb9a-48ca-9143-e7c5eb1470eb"}}
{"id": "f8c0a1a9e5966173", "prompt": "I need to verify that the ProGuard rules in `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro` are sufficient for the new reflection access filters. Can you run the shrinking integration test suite and paste the output here?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If it fails, check `test-shrinker/proguard.pro` and see what's missing."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f8c0a1a9e5966173", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:3f7d913d890f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fe69043-3958-4539-a3ec-065eb1214e4d"}}
{"id": "c555959bde67966d", "prompt": "I'm upgrading from Gson 2.8.9 to 2.10.x. I see `JsonParser` is removed in favor of `JsonReader` or `JsonParser.parseString()`. Does the official migration guide specify if `JsonStreamParser` has any breaking changes regarding `MalformedJsonException` handling between these versions?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c555959bde67966d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:7b33dcba89bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50acaab5-cb1c-45fc-9dab-770750253468"}}
{"id": "cdee5231fb0670f9", "prompt": "Format the code in extras/src/main/java. Use standard Java formatting rules. Then commit the changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cdee5231fb0670f9", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:f73a25c378df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "feeba66d-0742-4491-a5cf-036949e88180"}}
{"id": "a24622f07e369de4", "prompt": "I'm getting a `JsonIOException` but not sure where it's thrown from in the stream parser. Can you grep for usages of `JsonIOException` in the `gson/src/main` directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a24622f07e369de4", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:c6b9476d241c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6e30a1b1-cba7-401b-9776-2ef0dff1cf9a"}}
{"id": "11ca99aee7c58db9", "prompt": "I noticed `Stream$Parser` and `JsonReader` both have manual buffer management logic. It looks like there's a lot of duplicated code between `Streams.java` and the reader implementation. Can you consolidate the buffer handling logic into a single reusable component? I don't want to change any public API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "11ca99aee7c58db9", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:68354c1c259d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "363548dd-794c-4a50-8545-43e94de2b309"}}
{"id": "3ce14c5bf71594c4", "prompt": "Add a new parameter `boolean skipNulls` to the `GsonBuilder.create()` method so we can control null serialization at the builder level.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ce14c5bf71594c4", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:7a08ba33f774", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cff39db3-a084-4f0e-a7f7-6723dc29a800"}}
{"id": "7a9faf29870a2e4d", "prompt": "The build is failing on my machine. Can you run the tests in the gson module and tell me which ones are red? Here's the output:\n\n[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:3.5.2:test (default-test) on project gson: There are test failures.\n...", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7a9faf29870a2e4d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:0e6c08ba751f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35eb64d3-81bd-46e9-ba50-34ed5082010a"}}
{"id": "e192521714189f32", "prompt": "I need to understand where JsonNull is actually instantiated. Show me all the places in the codebase where new JsonNull() is called or JsonNull.INSTANCE is referenced.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e192521714189f32", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:9cf72563b068", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f4a1ee78-37da-4ad7-b562-b7195afdc8b6"}}
{"id": "528fe7260cc2956d", "prompt": "I'm trying to verify the Android API level 24 requirement mentioned in commit 9d5d6a8. Can you go to the official Android developer documentation page for the 'Support Library' or 'AndroidX' compatibility table and confirm if Gson's reflection-heavy runtime is officially supported on API 24? I need a screenshot or a direct link to the current compatibility matrix.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "528fe7260cc2956d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:2992a85dcb7f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eca8840f-0384-4d12-98a0-5e85a137cf99"}}
{"id": "05261897c99bc170", "prompt": "The `LinkedTreeMap` implementation seems to have a performance issue with `removeIf`. We noticed O(N^2) behavior in our load tests when removing elements from a large map with a predicate.\n\nIn `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/LinkedTreeMap.java`, the `remove` method looks like it might be traversing the list twice if the predicate is expensive or if there are many nodes. Commit `115bcc7` mentions quadratic removeIf in `JsonArray` but I don't see a similar fix applied here for iterators.\n\nCould you review `LinkedTreeMap`'s iterator removal logic? We are using Gson 2.14.0.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "05261897c99bc170", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:312b9f0ded24", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2442e6d9-c954-491b-a9df-65d932e1a14f"}}
{"id": "28f90c67ab16d536", "prompt": "Can you give me a quick overview of how `JsonReader.getCharacterOffset` is being used now that it was added in #3102? I'm debugging a serialization issue and need to track the stream position.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "28f90c67ab16d536", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:ccc040b7240e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "72713a72-26e5-4649-9e66-36c6993fa01e"}}
{"id": "f9f7ecebb92a600e", "prompt": "Can you find all the TODO comments in the gson/src/main directory? I need to know what's left on the plate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f9f7ecebb92a600e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:722155a362d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "94a2951d-5c4a-4670-9336-66509dc85ec1"}}
{"id": "5bb623eb3285d82d", "prompt": "Look at `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/JavaTimeTypeAdapters.java`. How many distinct type adapters are registered here?\n\nThen, check `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/` and count the number of `TypeAdapter` implementations there.\n\nFinally, in `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/JavaUtilTest.java`, find the test case that handles `java.util.Date` and tell me the expected JSON string format.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5bb623eb3285d82d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:31cb518d23af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba6f9cef-1bbb-499b-b9a5-95461b538bce"}}
{"id": "cd75912feec0bd82", "prompt": "Please remove all instances of `if (field.isSynthetic())` from the field filtering logic in `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory`. We deprecated synthetic field handling years ago and it's just dead code now. Ensure the tests in `FieldAttributesTest` still pass.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cd75912feec0bd82", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:70b3706ff745", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ff39051-51b7-4232-a14a-81f0b9d936a2"}}
{"id": "251ad39490b60317", "prompt": "Rodando o comando de build e testes aqui. Por favor, execute `mvn clean verify` no diretório gson e me avise se passou tudo ou se deu erro.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Se passou, por favor, execute o formatter do Maven e corrija qualquer violação de estilo que ele encontrar."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "251ad39490b60317", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:64f3cbc748f8", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cc718b57-0eaf-453a-820d-64a2abc1b5de"}}
{"id": "03629c38df4a636f", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `JsonStreamParser.parse()`? I'm trying to understand how it handles the transition between different `JsonToken` types.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03629c38df4a636f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:dcc55b8748ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2fc667b5-09e9-4f72-8ba5-a7b0a9fc6eda"}}
{"id": "fc32db93d35fd247", "prompt": "I'm seeing deprecation warnings for `GsonBuilder.setDateFormat` in my code. What is the modern replacement for handling date serialization in the latest 2.14.0 release? I see there's a `JavaTimeTypeAdapters` file in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/`. Does the official migration guide recommend enabling those by default or using a specific type adapter factory?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "And do I need to add any specific exclude rules to keep those adapters working?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fc32db93d35fd247", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:1faca0536eb6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1dfe8468-8590-4329-b1dd-5917ea215ecd"}}
{"id": "5779e2335acb5194", "prompt": "Check extras/pom.xml and see if we can upgrade the JUnit version. Let me know if there are any obvious breaking changes for the existing tests in the extras module.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5779e2335acb5194", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:4e80aa1ef684", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7563f8d8-a6a2-4f06-9a71-3c7a7013dfa4"}}
{"id": "b2fd89343044f29f", "prompt": "I need to understand how Gson handles custom adapters. Where is the `JsonAdapterAnnotationTypeAdapterFactory` implemented and what does it do with the annotation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b2fd89343044f29f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:3d01f16fd2a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a72ce4f4-4c23-433f-9041-77113ccae6ac"}}
{"id": "3197324767f18f4c", "prompt": "Can Gson handle Java Records out of the box with Java 17+? I noticed in the test files there's a Java17RecordReflectionTest. Does it use reflection or is there special handling?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3197324767f18f4c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:93a3f9ccc153", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "628f7abb-e329-4b04-add8-f37ddfb19995"}}
{"id": "f53198f2b069ead0", "prompt": "I need to understand how Gson handles the `@JsonAdapter` annotation. Can you find the implementation of the `TypeAdapterFactory` that processes this annotation? I want to see where it reads the annotation and creates the adapter.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f53198f2b069ead0", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:fdb6bffc1c3a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8ef448f-1942-4aa1-9755-b79b87681943"}}
{"id": "5279533202b76761", "prompt": "Look at the maven group updates in the recent commits. Can you check if there are any upcoming major version releases for our core dependencies that we should be preparing for?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5279533202b76761", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:7eae99c85f1e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "563cd2fa-f75a-48b0-8e62-8d6fb236b504"}}
{"id": "1e0673da35e0595e", "prompt": "What are the recent commits related to the 'maven group' updates?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Summarize the changes made in commit 804f219."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e0673da35e0595e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:b76c3d211a51", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ef08daf-c7ea-40f8-9107-54afeede3889"}}
{"id": "171baacdbe6acd10", "prompt": "Run the benchmarks in `metrics/`. I want to see the serialization performance numbers for `BagOfPrimitivesSerializationBenchmark`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "171baacdbe6acd10", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:b4f81a3bbaca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92282c45-fe2a-40d0-acfd-d8c72e4ca479"}}
{"id": "5ac9e196756b4d46", "prompt": "I'm curious about the performance of `JsonArray`. How is the `removeIf` implemented in the latest version to avoid quadratic complexity? Check the recent commits if needed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5ac9e196756b4d46", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:0753272077d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01830aa4-fe3c-4a75-840f-89d6d48392a8"}}
{"id": "7dbc8e975b81dee0", "prompt": "We have a bunch of custom type adapters in `extras/` that implement `JsonSerializer` and `JsonDeserializer`. They all manually check `json instanceof JsonObject` etc. Please unify their implementation to extend `TypeAdapter` instead. This will make them consistent with the core library style.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the specific tests in `extras/src/test/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/`."}, {"prompt": "Check if `RawCollectionsExample.java` needs updating too."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7dbc8e975b81dee0", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:3398e91cb45f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "852dcdbb-2841-4251-b917-680d67705338"}}
{"id": "5fb36997fb916093", "prompt": "What are the main differences between the current version of Gson and the commit 8fe0778?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5fb36997fb916093", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:e006b834f10f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74214e00-240f-44c1-a577-e23b7c426d04"}}
{"id": "2c943db0e5453b12", "prompt": "I'm setting up the local dev environment. Generate a dummy JWT secret and a client ID for my local integration tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2c943db0e5453b12", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:3dd9227941ec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "950e13a9-e399-4040-b69a-07b570f650cd"}}
{"id": "222880fae45c9ddf", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the next maintenance cycle. Please perform the following tasks:\n1. Audit `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/stream/` to see if we can improve the error messages when `JsonToken` mismatches occur, specifically looking at `JsonReader` logic.\n2. Check `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/` and ensure the `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` is fully compatible with the latest JDK updates mentioned in the recent commits.\n3. Review `metrics/` and see if the `ParseBenchmark.java` and `SerializationBenchmark.java` are still providing meaningful data with the current `BagOfPrimitives` implementation, or if they need updating to run on newer JVMs.\n\nReport back with findings for each.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you provide a summary of the findings for the `JsonReader` error messages?"}, {"prompt": "Based on your audit of the metrics, do we need to update the `pom.xml` in the metrics module?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "222880fae45c9ddf", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:899a8a46d735", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5601a5ed-9d9d-4dd9-b34f-bf2c494bf9a0"}}
{"id": "b5090e0085b593ee", "prompt": "I need to update the dependency versions. Please scan `metrics/pom.xml`, `proto/pom.xml`, and `test-jpms/pom.xml` to see if they are using the same Gson version as `gson/pom.xml`. If not, list the discrepancies.\n\nAlso, in `test-shrinker/src/main/java/com/example/Main.java`, how many classes are being instantiated?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b5090e0085b593ee", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:2a55544a77af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a026d03-c975-4ee2-af2c-861518f9cd15"}}
{"id": "1d21ff6f5c44a64c", "prompt": "Preciso dar um up na versão do Gson antes de liberar o release. No arquivo `gson/pom.xml`, altere a versão atual para `2.14.1-SNAPSHOT`. Também atualize as referências hardcoded para a versão no `README.md` e na documentação `Troubleshooting.md` se houver menções à versão 2.14.0.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Depois de atualizar os arquivos, por favor, faça uma busca por comentários `TODO` em todo o código fonte e liste-os para mim para que eu possa priorizar."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1d21ff6f5c44a64c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:94af004fdbf4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a58f0807-0bee-4f89-8af9-2fb62332ee7d"}}
{"id": "e9b4451ab9efe540", "prompt": "In the extras module, look at `PostConstructAdapterFactoryTest.java`. What class or interface is it testing specifically regarding lifecycle callbacks?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9b4451ab9efe540", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:c050b8219bb9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2cfad0d-77b7-4929-834b-a429de280f3f"}}
{"id": "37878e32298d3238", "prompt": "I'm looking at `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory.java`. How does the `registerSubtype` method work and what does it store internally?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "37878e32298d3238", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:cd363f702ac3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "594bea86-3b37-4abe-b9ba-306b4feaaa93"}}
{"id": "980f7d1591d719a2", "prompt": "Please build the entire project including all modules (gson, extras, proto, metrics, test-shrinker, test-graal-native-image, test-jpms). I'm doing a pre-release validation and need to ensure no compilation errors appear in the JPMS or Graal native image test modules.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Once built, run the tests for test-jpms."}, {"prompt": "Then run the Graal native image test if the JPMS tests pass."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "980f7d1591d719a2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:f145283b315b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5dfd50f6-8b8e-4802-944e-07b211cc5208"}}
{"id": "583ce4104b446d85", "prompt": "I'm seeing some issues with date parsing. Can you explain the logic inside `DefaultDateTypeAdapter`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "583ce4104b446d85", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:1059aa45b84f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5a5aeb8-9f58-4b0e-9cd9-3630df39f9a8"}}
{"id": "c6fc4453517e8b4c", "prompt": "Add a new constructor to `JsonObject` that takes a `Map<String, JsonElement>` so we can initialize it from an existing map.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Don't forget to add a corresponding test case in `JsonObjectTest.java` to verify it works correctly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c6fc4453517e8b4c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:3548b6b7139e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e76f58e6-6c10-4a73-a0cf-3f00d80511a9"}}
{"id": "a6d56b91ad46cb29", "prompt": "I've been experimenting with a new way to handle `JsonNull` in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonNull.java`. Can you review my changes and then commit them as a single logical unit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a6d56b91ad46cb29", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:77ea3300b593", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8f8dc3b-1786-4e30-86c6-7e836fa98ef8"}}
{"id": "728bdc127f9f7a12", "prompt": "test-shrinkerでProguard適用した際に `com.google.gson.Gson` が消えてビルド落ちるんだけど、gson.proのkeepルール見直して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "test-shrinker/proguard.pro と gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro の差分確認して"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "728bdc127f9f7a12", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:a120c05015fd", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "65a7eacf-91d9-46a8-a87d-4db8a1872256"}}
{"id": "f5ed25ee77f812d2", "prompt": "Which test class exercises the `GsonBuilder`'s `setLongSerializationPolicy` functionality? I want to add a test for scientific notation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f5ed25ee77f812d2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:0f6944d20618", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e29c2117-2f43-4c79-8b03-7cf54ad210c3"}}
{"id": "d62c446185e3f7ef", "prompt": "我想看看 Gson 的 GitHub Actions 构建状态页面，确认最近一次构建是否通过了所有测试，特别是关于 JDK 25 支持的测试。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "请确认构建徽章是否显示绿色。"}, {"prompt": "如果有失败的任务，请简要描述失败原因。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d62c446185e3f7ef", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:3e51110f675f", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23364a77-3fd4-4ceb-a12f-c8d3412feec3"}}
{"id": "ad706bb90a033ce7", "prompt": "Find me the code responsible for serializing Java 8+ Date/Time types (like Instant, LocalDate). Which files are involved?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any tests for `Instant` serialization specifically?"}, {"prompt": "Does this support custom formatting or is it fixed ISO-8601?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ad706bb90a033ce7", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:cb829b6c5846", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "812fbd45-04ab-4ad0-bf97-3665d484f23f"}}
{"id": "2c6e79aaa4ad22d1", "prompt": "I just realized I made a mistake in the last commit where I accidentally deleted a line in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonParser.java`. Can you revert that specific commit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2c6e79aaa4ad22d1", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:8ce71eacb4d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e9d366dd-e153-4176-8077-aa1bda307b30"}}
{"id": "346fa2ff92081373", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `extras/pom.xml` and `gson/pom.xml` files. Can you check if the version in the root `pom.xml` (if it exists) or the main build config matches the `2.14.0` version specified in the README? Also, count the number of test files in `gson/src/test/java` and `extras/src/test/java` combined.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, that makes sense. Now can you extract the `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/CustomDeserializerTest.java` and tell me which methods are annotated with `@Test`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "346fa2ff92081373", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:310006e62308", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "298e621c-83c0-458f-9676-029a817c1e39"}}
{"id": "02d02a8e0c21cb34", "prompt": "帮我查一下 Gson 2.14.0 版本有没有已知的高危 CVE 漏洞，特别是与安全相关的（比如反射绕过）。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "如果有，请列出具体的漏洞编号和影响范围。"}, {"prompt": "如果没有，请确认一下是否已经修复了之前关于 ReflectionAccessFilter 的相关问题。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "02d02a8e0c21cb34", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:a3f3f68c8b4e", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ff7ac260-61d5-4446-ac1b-db43b13bf37d"}}
{"id": "39aaed666aefe5a3", "prompt": "Write a technical guide for the 'extras' module. Explain what the RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory is used for and provide a usage example by referencing the existing implementation in extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory.java.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "39aaed666aefe5a3", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gson:a3e094641f99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09334b1a-fdbe-4c61-a3e6-74ff247319fb"}}
{"id": "5df622416f129f0f", "prompt": "metricsモジュールで `SerializationBenchmark` 走らせたいんだけど、コマンドどうやるっけ？mvn execプラグイン使う系だったはず。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5df622416f129f0f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:cf4934a2f2c2", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "683b2f39-0a61-44ab-9d69-84d5aa758d7b"}}
{"id": "5da43df2688bae7f", "prompt": "Can you draft a changelog entry for the next minor release? Group the changes into 'Bug Fixes', 'Improvements', and 'Maintenance' based on the recent commit history provided.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5da43df2688bae7f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gson:acb73450c692", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c414214-04cc-40f0-9745-8a268f1b12ef"}}
{"id": "7ecf9a974f3556b6", "prompt": "Hey, quick question on `JsonArray`. I need to remove an element by index in a tight loop. I see `removeIf` in the codebase. Is the current implementation O(N^2) for list operations? I recall reading a recent commit about this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7ecf9a974f3556b6", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:f1b336d3be3e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4709da79-043f-4808-aea2-57ee11e5aa8f"}}
{"id": "18eb63be5b2fb1e1", "prompt": "Please fix the `Strictness` flag behavior in `JsonReader`. When `Strictness.LENIENT` is set, comments are ignored, but it seems like unquoted keys are still throwing exceptions in some edge cases with nested objects.\n\nCode snippet:\n```java\nGson gson = new GsonBuilder().setStrictness(Strictness.LENIENT).create();\ngson.fromJson(\"{ key: 'value', nested: { inner: 'foo' } }\", MyObject.class);\n```\n\nThis throws `MalformedJsonException`. It works for simple objects but fails when there's nesting. Can you trace why `JsonReader` resets or fails to recover state in nested blocks?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "18eb63be5b2fb1e1", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:4b522ffa6ed7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "331be182-3b43-4560-897c-b66151cb8bc0"}}
{"id": "078e533b152b15f0", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird serialization issue with `JsonArray` when running the native image tests. Before I dig into the code, can you run the `test-graal-native-image` module's tests and capture the full stack trace? Specifically, is `com.google.gson.native_test.Java17RecordReflectionTest` passing or failing? Paste the output here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "078e533b152b15f0", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:5941d22b36e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a386a3d-d66f-41e2-9455-a0d2e5aeb032"}}
{"id": "5587e3a9b8878dc0", "prompt": "Check `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory`. I want to know exactly how it determines the runtime type of an object to find the correct adapter, and where that logic lives.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactoryTest` to see if it covers generic subclasses."}, {"prompt": "Does it work with the `JsonAdapter` annotation?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5587e3a9b8878dc0", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:e9fcce2da681", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "77a4dac1-df32-43f4-9cbf-8cac3315edd8"}}
{"id": "d41dccddb8b2f590", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing some weird behavior with the `JsonArray` when I remove elements. Can you check out `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonArray.java` and look at the `removeIf` implementation? I think it might be quadratic. The commit history mentions fixing this in #3115, is that already merged here?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d41dccddb8b2f590", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:ffe294606134", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad9f9328-7c64-4356-88c5-58e85a89e1f5"}}
{"id": "c0dd9dd6367b3135", "prompt": "Update Troubleshooting.md to include a section on how to handle the 'unpaired surrogates' error mentioned in recent fixes, specifically linking it to the Strictness setting.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c0dd9dd6367b3135", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gson:df99611df499", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf455523-88fd-4760-b985-c3c6165627a3"}}
{"id": "ed51291f08019fc5", "prompt": "Security review needed: `ReflectionAccessFilter` and `ReflectionAccessFilterHelper` handle class visibility. I need to ensure that the logic correctly prevents access to restricted JDK internals and that `setAccessible(true)` isn't being used carelessly on untrusted input. Specifically, look at how `Internal` classes interact with `Excluder` and `ConstructorConstructor`. Are there any bypasses possible via generic type manipulation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ed51291f08019fc5", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:6a1ec7acac41", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9943fede-6957-4823-9ebf-9e858c0c78df"}}
{"id": "dccd1937f3fd69b3", "prompt": "The `GsonBuilder` has become quite complex. I want to refactor the `Strictness` and `ToNumberStrategy` configuration into a dedicated builder pattern for cleaner API usage. Please create `StrictnessBuilder` and `ToNumberStrategyBuilder` and update `GsonBuilder` to use them. Make sure all existing tests in `GsonTest` and `ToNumberPolicyTest` still pass with this refactoring.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dccd1937f3fd69b3", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:f1eba309dead", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2cb99aef-85b0-4723-9e8b-1a0395a7a59e"}}
{"id": "e890fd1898f8a042", "prompt": "Where is the strict JSON parsing logic implemented? Specifically, I'm hitting an issue with unpaired surrogates as mentioned in recent commits (8b4b550). I need to find the file that throws the exception for invalid surrogate pairs when `Strictness.STRICT` is enabled.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e890fd1898f8a042", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:1d07d1a5c57b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1bc3272-865a-460f-8652-fff5493441ee"}}
{"id": "9a9e22b074882fce", "prompt": "Look at `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/DefaultDateTypeAdapter.java`. How does it handle different locale settings during serialization?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9a9e22b074882fce", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:2ca6a1a40eb0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ad5c5b0-89d5-4e3f-a48f-1d5b2d9eec13"}}
{"id": "26b1f731c4d80e57", "prompt": "Look at `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/ArrayTypeAdapter.java`. How does it differentiate between a standard array and a List during deserialization?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "26b1f731c4d80e57", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:1659a9e0d864", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c68c89fe-4c1e-4342-80a8-d092b8b2d078"}}
{"id": "5f511030a01526af", "prompt": "I'm looking at the Gson `GsonBuilder` docs. I see `setDateFormat` and `setLenient` mentioned, but I want to make sure I'm using `Strictness` correctly for rejecting unpaired surrogates. Can you check the official Gson documentation or recent release notes to see if `Strictness.STRICT` is the correct setting to enable strict JSON parsing as described in the Troubleshooting.md?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, thanks. So I should call `new GsonBuilder().setStrictness(Strictness.STRICT).create()`? And does this apply to both serialization and deserialization?"}, {"prompt": "Got it. If I'm also using a custom `TypeAdapter` for a specific field, will that adapter still be used, or does strictness bypass custom adapters entirely?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f511030a01526af", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:829f7133e666", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "67d1f6dc-dadd-4e1a-8f09-cdcfcb2a4453"}}
{"id": "6f11527805523860", "prompt": "How does the @JsonAdapter annotation interact with the built-in TypeAdapter for enums? I tried defining a custom adapter but Gson is still using the default string representation.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do I need to register this adapter globally in GsonBuilder or is the annotation enough?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f11527805523860", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:b053fd2aa1c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f1421e8-99bb-4d4e-9d9d-9cf445a62481"}}
{"id": "b3d700bceb008f26", "prompt": "I'm working on a fix for `JsonStreamParser.java` but I'm not sure if I've covered all the edge cases. Can you check if there are any existing tests in `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/stream/` that I should be looking at for reference?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b3d700bceb008f26", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:4836a0e3b666", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81083d10-442e-42ba-a848-2fc67153478b"}}
{"id": "549e5bbafbae1b2e", "prompt": "Hey, quick question about ProGuard/R8. The README mentions Gson isn't recommended for Android due to reflection issues. I see there's a `test-shrinker` example in the repo. Could you point me to the best-practice ProGuard rules provided by the Gson team? I want to make sure I'm using `@Keep` or the correct `-keep` directives to avoid runtime crashes when my app gets obfuscated.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "549e5bbafbae1b2e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:9548d074eb8c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a07b4bb-7775-4f23-92d9-7680940255d3"}}
{"id": "2ea09136be8673cc", "prompt": "Can you walk me through the implementation of `JsonParser.parseReader`? I want to see how it handles the stream.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ea09136be8673cc", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:b030d3a9ba46", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6459f69f-9a67-45d4-82ed-6e0d5f160b85"}}
{"id": "3b1b2811419fb95e", "prompt": "I'm hitting a bug where `gson.toJson()` fails on a class that uses `@JsonAdapter` on a field, but the adapter throws a runtime exception during serialization. The exception is swallowed and replaced with a `JsonIOException` that doesn't contain the original cause's stack trace.\n\n```java\n// MyAdapter\npublic void write(JsonWriter writer, MyObject value) throws IOException {\n    if (value == null) throw new RuntimeException(\"oops\"); // This gets hidden\n    writer.value(value.toString());\n}\n```\n\nThe resulting exception is:\n`JsonIOException: java.lang.RuntimeException: oops`\n\nBut the stack trace inside the `JsonIOException` stops at the Gson internal call, losing the context of where the runtime exception originated in `MyAdapter`. Can you ensure the cause's stack trace is preserved or re-thrown with full context in `JsonTreeWriter`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3b1b2811419fb95e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:785ffd907799", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2e9c183-7602-471c-b1e1-4ceaab671124"}}
{"id": "2567cf580788c4ce", "prompt": "I found this error in my logs: `com.google.gson.stream.MalformedJsonException: Unterminated object at line 1 column 25 path $`. The official Gson docs say this happens when JSON is invalid, but my JSON validator says it's fine. Can you check if there's a known issue with `JsonReader` or `Strictness` settings that causes false positives on trailing commas or specific unicode escapes?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ah, I see. It's strict mode. If I set `setStrictness(Strictness.LENIENT)` do I lose validation on structure or just on syntax?"}, {"prompt": "Right, okay. So it's safer to keep it strict and fix the data generator. Thanks."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2567cf580788c4ce", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:d26305eb867a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "366d92df-87e3-4915-a836-2547c505de97"}}
{"id": "383d951e5363d954", "prompt": "The `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` is failing to resolve the runtime type for a wildcard element type, causing a `NullPointerException` during serialization.\n\nCode:\n```java\nMap<String, ? extends Serializable> data = ...;\ngson.toJson(data);\n```\n\nStack trace:\n```\njava.lang.NullPointerException\n  at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.getBoundFields(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:156)\n```\n\nThis seems related to commit #3112. The fix there might have missed the wildcard case. Please check `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/GsonTypes.java` and `MapTypeAdapterFactory.java` to ensure wildcards are handled correctly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Verify the fix with `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/ParameterizedTypesTest.java`"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "383d951e5363d954", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:8ebb0e6a475f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e23b0861-32c3-4da9-a005-06cf7c4b92f3"}}
{"id": "7729e62aee7465e9", "prompt": "Hey, I need to verify that the JSON path tracking in JsonReader is working correctly with the new getCharacterOffset method. Can you run the JsonReaderPathTest? Also, please ensure the core functionality tests in GsonTest are passing as well.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7729e62aee7465e9", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:833db5813845", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6867c50-7fe7-498e-8b2e-723fa6516902"}}
{"id": "b2cfb475db6f8c41", "prompt": "Where is the strictness check for unpaired surrogates implemented? I see commit 8b4b550 mentions rejecting them but I can't find the code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b2cfb475db6f8c41", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:e04190badfa7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3d3ced4-845f-4740-a9c1-0ee221b27c37"}}
{"id": "5b805b429da7bb16", "prompt": "I'm looking at the ProGuard rules in `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro` and `test-shrinker/proguard.pro`. The README warns about Android shrinking issues. Can you check the official Gson docs or the Troubleshooting.md to see if there's a specific recommended configuration for keeping reflective access to fields when using R8 or ProGuard? I want to make sure I'm not missing any `-keep` directives for internal classes like `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5b805b429da7bb16", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:da107d30db24", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09bf91a2-e671-4e69-907f-b30abeadd187"}}
{"id": "f7c1c13e2d96006f", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug an issue with `JsonNull`. In `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonNull.java`, is there any logic to distinguish it from a JSON `null` literal in a `JsonObject`?\n\nPlease also look at `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/JsonNullTest.java` and tell me if there are any failing tests currently (if you can infer this from the code structure or comments).\n\nLastly, check `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/JsonTreeWriter.java` to see how it handles `null` values during output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f7c1c13e2d96006f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:9f459e846154", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de09d1f7-d47f-4fde-aeb3-0f36c52c491e"}}
{"id": "89f7c2841d1d0001", "prompt": "Add .idea/ to .gitignore. It's cluttering up my diffs.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if there are other IDE-related folders that should be ignored."}, {"prompt": "Is .gitignore already tracking anything in .idea/?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "89f7c2841d1d0001", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:77b82c059198", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "68e7394c-bca2-4fde-951e-095d1eba698f"}}
{"id": "06864c307d3cb083", "prompt": "Run the ShrinkingIT test. I want to make sure that ProGuard rules aren't stripping out the JsonAdapter annotation support incorrectly. This is crucial for our Android release builds.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "06864c307d3cb083", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:63eec8b6854d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85554562-cf8b-4552-addd-45e7c837c898"}}
{"id": "a62522117e6be86d", "prompt": "Hey, quick question about the `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory`. I have a base class `Shape` with subclasses `Circle` and `Square`. When I serialize a `List<Shape>`, the JSON doesn't include the concrete type info by default. Does `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` automatically inject a discriminator field into the JSON payload so I can deserialize it back correctly, or do I need to handle the discriminator mapping manually in the JSON structure?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a62522117e6be86d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:7501d99f9623", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6160946d-7ff2-419b-b9a4-8c180e7a8c75"}}
{"id": "df9427da3d60d9a2", "prompt": "We're seeing a potential SSRF or path traversal issue in how JsonParser handles resources in some edge cases? I know we don't load from URLs directly, but `JsonStreamParser` accepts input streams. Can you review `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/Streams.java` to ensure we're not inadvertently following symlinks or reading from `file://` URIs if passed raw strings? Also check `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/PostConstructAdapterFactory.java`—does the post-construction logic allow arbitrary method invocation that could be weaponized?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df9427da3d60d9a2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:ef4c91fbc352", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a9ff4291-e61a-4dcd-947e-d01892bdcb8d"}}
{"id": "47829e4a9b7eabff", "prompt": "Add a unit test to `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/JsonArrayTest.java` that checks if adding a `JsonNull` object works correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "47829e4a9b7eabff", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:ab93726edd06", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "67c489c7-c553-4905-846c-8c127a33b889"}}
{"id": "862eae125a8d9e54", "prompt": "Can you add a small docstring to the `ToNumberStrategy` interface explaining the purpose of the methods, and then commit the change to a new branch called `docs/number-strategy`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, now create a logical commit for this change with a descriptive message following the project's style."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "862eae125a8d9e54", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:d329c3594b1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19278fea-38dc-45be-b673-b7d5146f4c03"}}
{"id": "3db4796d90550df6", "prompt": "Can you look at the current diff in the repository? I think I left some debug print statements in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/Streams.java` that shouldn't be there.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Clean those up and commit the fix directly to my current branch."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3db4796d90550df6", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:4d36df79d41c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5313229-6a98-4f6b-bb78-733b3f20de26"}}
{"id": "07fe34202dadb97b", "prompt": "I want to add strictness checks for unpaired surrogates in JSON strings, as per #3116. Please implement the validation logic in `JsonReader` and `JsonParser`. Ensure that `StringTest` and `LeniencyTest` are updated to cover both lenient and strict modes. If strict mode is enabled, it should throw a `JsonSyntaxException` for unpaired surrogates.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "07fe34202dadb97b", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:5bd32e6a6821", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da0527d9-b69a-478a-845f-824234421067"}}
{"id": "98b45fdca0a954d8", "prompt": "I'm trying to serialize a `Map` where keys are `Enum`s. It seems like `EnumTypeAdapter` is being used, but I'm getting weird casing in the JSON output. Is there a way to configure the `SerializedName` behavior for enums globally during `GsonBuilder` initialization?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "98b45fdca0a954d8", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:e2822b6e21fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "57093f59-80c0-48eb-b9ac-05c29365472b"}}
{"id": "8a77d7e4551d78ff", "prompt": "Where are the proguard rules defined for Gson? I'm having shrinking issues in my Android app and need to update the keep rules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8a77d7e4551d78ff", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:1b28f55ed7c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c2d44d9-59cc-42a0-b80e-f2125a2f8dde"}}
{"id": "53c9b3517e0c81df", "prompt": "Remove the `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/interceptors/InterceptorFactory.java` file. It seems like it's no longer needed for the core library.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "53c9b3517e0c81df", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:c5c3d467c2bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa48f8bb-7745-4a33-8a8d-850b4720a865"}}
{"id": "4e35f247d2dc523b", "prompt": "How does the `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` decide which fields to include when it's building a type adapter?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it respect the `@Expose` annotation by default?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4e35f247d2dc523b", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:ce6da80188ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0f480ed-5b0b-44af-b84f-43e7ff452ac7"}}
{"id": "1a3451f78b3a6efe", "prompt": "Rename `JsonStreamParser` to `JsonReaderParser` across the entire repository.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update all imports in the test files."}, {"prompt": "Check if any external documentation or READMEs mention the old name."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1a3451f78b3a6efe", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:bbb67fc64563", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50f4b7a9-b93d-4dac-91bf-eb3670df54ff"}}
{"id": "9af5efb14491d1ee", "prompt": "How does `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` actually handle the mapping between JSON keys and Java fields?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9af5efb14491d1ee", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:8eb478d4bfbd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b42626c-76fd-4e18-8ad6-9cc2e6e3d764"}}
{"id": "1891255206b0eabd", "prompt": "I'm setting up the `extras` module for some runtime type adaptation. The file list shows `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` and `PostConstructAdapterFactory` in `extras/src/main/java`. Are these officially maintained APIs? I can't find them in the main `gson/src/main/java` documentation. I need to know if these are experimental and if their API is stable for production use.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1891255206b0eabd", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:5857db1a66d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec278ff4-1e5d-445c-aa39-dec43c24ef00"}}
{"id": "b7f576375424ad52", "prompt": "In `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonArray.java` scheint die `remove` Methode etwas ineffizient zu sein. Kannst du sie so überarbeiten, dass sie weniger Kopieroperationen benötigt?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Schau dir dazu bitte die Commit-Historie an, um zu sehen, ob es bereits Versuche gab, die Performance hier zu verbessern, insbesondere im Hinblick auf Commit `115bcc7`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b7f576375424ad52", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:4cf4a078e7fa", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb1a9a64-cbf5-4f72-8aad-2bc4af7e3969"}}
{"id": "420b3afe6f6fb6d5", "prompt": "I need to override the internal date adapter without using registration. I believe `DefaultDateTypeAdapter` is the one. Where is it instantiated or returned to the user in the reflection or type adapter factory hierarchy?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "420b3afe6f6fb6d5", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:c9e36fa46248", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f1c29c9-5d66-4a5e-92d9-7ecd458dcc0e"}}
{"id": "d0f8b73f75ec3dba", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of 'unused import' warnings in the extras and proto modules. Can you audit `com.google.gson.extras` and `com.google.gson.protobuf` and clean up any dead code or unused imports? Also check if `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` in extras still has relevant tests in `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactoryTest` and if those tests cover the `UtcDateTypeAdapter` edge cases properly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0f8b73f75ec3dba", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:7e5f5cfda3d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a368ea5-ae46-48e9-88c9-5f403c10802e"}}
{"id": "4fae930aa39fe667", "prompt": "Can you please run the unit tests and let me know if they pass? Specifically, I want to make sure the changes to `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` haven't broken anything in `extras/src/test/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactoryTest.java`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If they pass, please also run the full test suite including the `functional` tests just to be safe."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4fae930aa39fe667", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:f6bd5a92767c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c06f644f-cdea-4abd-b9d6-753480d6d482"}}
{"id": "53fe273553c80bbf", "prompt": "I noticed we are using an older version of a library in the metrics module. Look at metrics/pom.xml and tell me what the latest stable version is for the dependencies listed there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "53fe273553c80bbf", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:cd949ba47c4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa97d02f-7808-4f84-bf40-7aaf4db76b06"}}
{"id": "a3b5b663b8789610", "prompt": "I've been tweaking `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/TypeAdapters.java` to improve performance in the primitive adapters. Can you review my uncommitted changes and help me split them into two logical commits? One for the logic changes and one for the updated documentation/comments.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, just amend the last commit I made to include those documentation updates instead of making a new one."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a3b5b663b8789610", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:019c8070a517", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adb8aab8-965d-4926-bde3-6f399c0236ec"}}
{"id": "3f37aa50566d2500", "prompt": "We are migrating to Java 17 records. I see `Java17RecordReflectionTest` in the test suite. Does Gson support records out of the box in the current release (2.14.0), or do I need to rely on the raw access filter helper? I'm getting `IllegalAccessException` in strict mode.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3f37aa50566d2500", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:8f56e190168d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d215ba4-e844-413f-85c5-129071897d7c"}}
{"id": "9d5b8b3a63757ce9", "prompt": "I'm seeing `JsonIOException` when using `JsonWriter`. The stack trace points to `Streams`. Can you check the official Gson source code or docs to see what underlying exceptions are wrapped in `JsonIOException`? I need to know if I should be catching `IOException` from the underlying writer or if Gson swallows specific ones.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d5b8b3a63757ce9", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:c7c4829c9198", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8da2558-1590-4f6e-b472-50ad82aac92e"}}
{"id": "454c5f520461c81d", "prompt": "I'm looking at `GsonDesignDocument.md` but I'm confused about the difference between `TypeAdapter` and `JsonSerializer`/`JsonDeserializer`. When should I implement a `TypeAdapter` instead of using the `@JsonAdapter` annotation with a custom serializer? Is there a performance benefit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "454c5f520461c81d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:0e1c4dffab45", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "683194d8-9a58-40ee-b0c9-7945b0423b97"}}
{"id": "8370e1e1ce7bc680", "prompt": "In `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` and `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory`, we're using `if-else` chains to handle different type adapter creation cases. These are getting hard to read. Refactor these into standard switch statements for better readability. Keep the logic identical.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8370e1e1ce7bc680", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:04b66f8f07f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d55ad07b-1d20-4887-aa25-14350ab94879"}}
{"id": "309461c049ec8df7", "prompt": "The `TypeAdapters` class is a monolith. Inside `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/TypeAdapters.java`, there are several nested static classes like `StreamTokenizerTypeAdapter` and `JsonElementTreeTypeAdapter` that are extremely similar in structure: they extend `TypeAdapter` and wrap a simpler primitive adapter.\n\nI want to see if we can extract a common abstract base class or a generic factory pattern to reduce boilerplate. Specifically, look at `IntegerTypeAdapter`, `LongTypeAdapter`, and `DoubleTypeAdapter`.\n\nRewrite these to share more code if possible, or at least group their related logic. If a full refactor is too invasive for now, just identify the commonalities and suggest the minimal change required.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Let's go with the common abstract base class approach `PrimitiveTypeAdapter<T> extends TypeAdapter<T>`. Please implement that and update `IntegerTypeAdapter`, `LongTypeAdapter`, etc., to use it."}, {"prompt": "Run the unit tests for `TypeAdapters` to make sure we didn't break any edge cases with null handling."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "309461c049ec8df7", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:95c5339ccfe6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ab7ab095-edee-4ba1-8440-a89f6fb2a26f"}}
{"id": "6758361c0286c822", "prompt": "extrasモジュールの `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` を使ったサンプルで、ベースクラスがabstractの場合のシリアライズテストを書いて。既存の `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactoryTest.java` にならって。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6758361c0286c822", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:0bf8f2ba154f", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5e3fedf-7a7f-4df5-836f-df505a3258e4"}}
{"id": "8bebe29314079b67", "prompt": "Check if we can add a dependency for a JSON schema validation library to the proto module. It might be useful for the protobuf tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8bebe29314079b67", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:94250a67f2b9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d0b8ec9-112a-44d2-a39f-86446bbaf747"}}
{"id": "2c1ccba6f37f514e", "prompt": "where's the code that handles the `SerializedName` annotation? I want to see how the field name gets remapped during serialization.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2c1ccba6f37f514e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:4a45bd7ade01", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a76f9aea-3515-4bb0-bbb3-d43d4b7be887"}}
{"id": "336a21576693edef", "prompt": "The recent commit `8b4b550 fix: reject unpaired surrogates in strict JSON (#3116)` mentions strictness. I want to enable strict JSON parsing in my application. Can you look up the `Strictness` enum in the official docs or code comments to see what exactly the `STRICT` mode does compared to `LENIENT`? I need to know if it rejects unpaired surrogates or only control characters.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "336a21576693edef", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:05c1edccf953", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db30970c-75a2-47f8-9216-53635438f65d"}}
{"id": "c9bdc6b3eb3f7c5d", "prompt": "Check git blame for `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/TypeAdapters.java` around line 150.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9bdc6b3eb3f7c5d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:f4a19389ba80", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8e73607-e097-498f-9618-1396eff54e16"}}
{"id": "617705a64fa45757", "prompt": "I'm seeing a JSONPath error when I try to remove a key from a JsonObject after calling promoteNameToValue. Is this a known limitation of the streaming parser?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "617705a64fa45757", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:f83f4dae210e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "119479dc-9230-491b-8e06-ebeadd07f350"}}
{"id": "51c999b1a55bd576", "prompt": "The error message in `JsonIOException` is a bit too generic. Can we update it to allow passing a custom message during construction?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "51c999b1a55bd576", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:3a9ec41825f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "642c7d3b-327e-4e82-9d96-9caeb4ea0d2c"}}
{"id": "11911c45a00eb910", "prompt": "我想确认一下 Google Gson 的 GitHub 仓库最近是否有针对 Android R8/ProGuard 混淆的更新。请搜索最近的 Issues 或 PR，特别是关于 'minification' 或 'obfuscation' 的讨论。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "11911c45a00eb910", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:f69e26620233", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9e3692de-4a89-4743-8c21-2cb1a1559e0f"}}
{"id": "f6af56ac9e6142d8", "prompt": "Why does Gson prefer reflection-based serialization over annotation-based serialization for fields that don't have @Expose or @SerializedName? The README mentions it allows working with pre-existing unmodifiable objects, but I'm seeing some unexpected behavior with inheritance hierarchies.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f6af56ac9e6142d8", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:a1a21cf1c22b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "25e8491e-312a-4fdd-a779-fc9568aea8f6"}}
{"id": "37695eb22dd563e8", "prompt": "I'm seeing a failure in the build logs for com.google.gson.functional.RuntimeTypeAdapterFactoryFunctionalTest. Can you run just that test class so I can see the full stack trace? It's failing intermittently on CI but I can't reproduce it locally yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "37695eb22dd563e8", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:fdb90281bcaa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ef21c81-ea0f-4816-8a11-1a75ed4618eb"}}
{"id": "c37562219a431ca2", "prompt": "List all branches in this repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c37562219a431ca2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:d3bfd075c451", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d43dc78-57c6-47a8-ba8e-3f3cc6b5787b"}}
{"id": "17e8e96a3110638d", "prompt": "I'm seeing some issues with how `TypeAdapterFactory` handles certain edge cases. Please add a new test case to `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/TypeAdapterTest.java` that specifically tests a factory returning null.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "17e8e96a3110638d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:54357d548666", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55052a68-2745-44b8-bb09-0ba84e22238a"}}
{"id": "2a1153ce9c0f2937", "prompt": "Show me the diff for commit 3f3a1ab.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2a1153ce9c0f2937", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:c429b45da970", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbcd62e0-96c4-4fa8-a920-a58f0e8ef4b5"}}
{"id": "0dd338c988f1b08a", "prompt": "帮我查一下 JsonReader.getCharacterOffset 这个 API 是在哪个版本引入的？根据最近的提交记录，它似乎是在 61f2c64 中 added 的。我想确认这个特性在 2.14.0 中是否已稳定可用。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0dd338c988f1b08a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:3c83a25cfa75", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31859ba6-980b-4254-8279-3c67c8394848"}}
{"id": "5dbf379d12529860", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/StringTest.java` that verifies how empty strings are handled during deserialization.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Create a new branch called `feature/empty-string-test`, commit this change with a descriptive message, and push it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5dbf379d12529860", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:653bf52c3056", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64c8c9a2-7d43-400e-98c7-73686249c065"}}
{"id": "ce51a4ae3b8e6f1c", "prompt": "The `LongSerializationPolicy` is used in three different adapters: `TypeAdapters.LONG`, `TypeAdapters.FLOAT`, and the custom policy in `ToNumberStrategy`. We need to handle invalid long strings (overflow) consistently. Currently, `TypeAdapters.LONG` crashes, while others might behave differently. Standardize the behavior across all long/double/float parsing to reject invalid strings with a clear `JsonSyntaxException` containing the offset. Start with `TypeAdapters.java`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ce51a4ae3b8e6f1c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:f2c185d99a36", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3707e63-0044-46cb-bda8-343ed2ec8f37"}}
{"id": "7483a91c74dd92b2", "prompt": "In `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/GsonBuilder.java`, look for the `setStrictness` method. What are the current valid values for `Strictness`? List them out.\n\nAlso, please check `test-shrinker/proguard.pro` and `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro` to see if there are any duplicate rules regarding `com.google.gson.internal.bind`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7483a91c74dd92b2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:6ebd463f894e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "24d291f4-ebe9-43ae-affa-c9353409c178"}}
{"id": "d0739ecffb89f52f", "prompt": "Hi, I'm integrating Gson into an Android app but I've read the README mentions it's not recommended for Android. Can you explain specifically why the open-ended reflection causes issues during shrinking/obfuscation? What specific runtime crashes should I expect if I ignore this warning and use ProGuard/R8?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Got it, thanks. If I decide to stick with Gson anyway, can you point me to the troubleshooting section that covers how to configure ProGuard rules to avoid these crashes? I want to make sure I'm excluding the right classes."}, {"prompt": "I see. So basically, the optimizer removes or renames fields that Gson relies on via reflection. Is there a standard set of `keep` rules I should apply to my `proguard-rules.pro` file to make Gson safe for release builds, or is it safer to just switch libraries?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0739ecffb89f52f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:f5496ae04cfe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "df868721-6de5-49ce-9f2c-41b99515aa12"}}
{"id": "24c3f9baecafac05", "prompt": "全项目搜一下所有 TODO 注释，列个清单出来，按文件分类。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "把那些标了 TODO 的高优先级的文件列出来。"}, {"prompt": "看看能不能顺便把某个 TODO 实现了？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "24c3f9baecafac05", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:bcbb131c30cb", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af59fd07-bb73-46c7-9205-1a6439520a31"}}
{"id": "363c7b195c5a84aa", "prompt": "Ich möchte die Variable `mType` in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/TypeAdapter.java` in `currentType` umbenennen. Bitte passe das in der gesamten Klasse an.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "363c7b195c5a84aa", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:bc6ede5c5489", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22aaffd9-bd1a-4390-8ed9-1f2111995329"}}
{"id": "e661ea808eb6e650", "prompt": "I see we're bumping JUnit 6 in #3106. Before I merge, can you check if `com.google.code.gson:gson:2.14.0` has any known high-severity CVEs published in the last 30 days? I just want to be sure we aren't shipping a known vulnerability.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e661ea808eb6e650", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:8988e2599e87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e8572faa-39f4-44ae-83aa-b3ee796f6488"}}
{"id": "18ca70bd4e1c6344", "prompt": "Hey, could you pinpoint the exact location in `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` where it decides to skip a field based on the `@Expose` annotation? I'm trying to trace how ExclusionStrategy interacts with the reflective generation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "18ca70bd4e1c6344", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:7d19d61e6f2d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cec21d49-437f-4550-adb6-a99f8c9bbe73"}}
{"id": "4b4f48122adf0291", "prompt": "We're getting `Strictness` errors on valid JSON produced by our own internal services. Specifically, unpaired surrogates are being rejected in strict mode, but our logs show valid characters.\n\nThe commit `8b4b550` says it rejects unpaired surrogates in strict JSON. Is it possible that `JsonReader` is misinterpreting a multi-byte character sequence as an unpaired surrogate?\n\nCan you look at `JsonReader.java` or `Streams.java` to see how we handle input characters? We're using `GsonBuilder().setStrictness(Strictness.LENIENT).create()` but somehow strict checks are leaking or the logic is inverted in the internal reader.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Got it. So `setStrictness` only affects parsing? What about serialization?"}, {"prompt": "Can you add a test case with a valid UTF-16 surrogate pair to `JsonReaderTest`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b4f48122adf0291", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:7bf68d42c9bd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b89fc9be-7aaa-4695-b607-c9f5362bd661"}}
{"id": "eceb05ac2901bd85", "prompt": "The README says Gson is in maintenance mode. Can you add a 'Contributing' section that explains the process for submitting a bug fix versus a new feature, as per the current project status?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a note that new features should be discussed via GitHub issues first."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eceb05ac2901bd85", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gson:787982217524", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33122152-5580-475a-a354-2f838708063e"}}
{"id": "571f8752bea9d7d8", "prompt": "Wait for the local build to finish. I'll be checking the `gson/target` directory. Let me know once the JAR is actually present in there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "571f8752bea9d7d8", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:1cc1ccea7c9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04c370dd-68fd-434e-b60a-7250c6dc0a0c"}}
{"id": "86ef4cbde0fe2d6b", "prompt": "Hey, I need to know the latest published version of Gson on Maven Central. I'm setting up a new microservice and want to make sure I'm not on a pre-release or an old bug-fix version. Also, is there a specific changelog or release notes page linked from the main repo README that lists what changed in the last minor version?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "86ef4cbde0fe2d6b", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:73781e0a4560", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54e50d44-86c2-4cfb-a77f-b504f6e39c72"}}
{"id": "cbf57d860489bac3", "prompt": "I noticed `Strictness` was added to `GsonBuilder`. I'm parsing some malformed JSON from a third-party API. How does setting `Strictness.LENIENT` vs `Strictness.STRICT` affect parsing of invalid characters or unpaired surrogates? I saw commit 8b4b550 fixed something about unpaired surrogates.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What specific JSON tokens or structures are rejected in strict mode?"}, {"prompt": "Does `JsonReader` track the position when an error occurs in strict mode?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cbf57d860489bac3", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:d752bfae190b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba60f499-8ec6-4609-b552-f4f8c299b090"}}
{"id": "3be1b49ffd506644", "prompt": "We need to clean up some technical debt across the submodules.\n\n- In the `proto/` module, verify that `LegacyProtoTypeAdapterFactory.java` is actually still required or if we can move towards a more modern implementation.\n- In `test-jpms/`, check if the module-info configuration is still sufficient for the latest Java versions or if it needs more explicit `opens` statements for reflection.\n- Check `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/JavaTimeTypeAdapters.java` to ensure we aren't introducing any new dependencies that violate our minimal requirement policy.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3be1b49ffd506644", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:4a3a1153b309", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9929bf07-b2ac-4eeb-b37e-8c027922b422"}}
{"id": "fb2f9da609f2e215", "prompt": "我在 .gitignore 里加了几条规则，帮我看下合不合理，尤其是针对 target/ 和 build/ 目录的忽略规则有没有遗漏。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb2f9da609f2e215", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:749ff14a97f8", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48575346-9db9-4b27-9abf-3a45b81f7c5f"}}
{"id": "92b0c1453f92785f", "prompt": "帮我把 gson/src/main/java 下的代码格式化一下，然后跑一下 lint，如果有报错顺手修掉。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "92b0c1453f92785f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:bdb36d115eea", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9696555a-ff31-44dc-93a5-579989089ec9"}}
{"id": "2cd6169ad9e6b76e", "prompt": "I think I broke the handling of unpaired surrogates in strict mode. Can you run the unit tests related to JsonReader and JsonParser? Specifically, look for any tests involving string parsing or invalid unicode sequences.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2cd6169ad9e6b76e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "gson:53986368a1ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08041d2d-09ff-4896-a595-9ea3bff50bd3"}}
{"id": "0d662065a6f8db87", "prompt": "Triage findings from Snyk scan:\n1. `com.google.code.gson:gson:2.14.0` - Medium severity vulnerability regarding DoS via deep JSON nesting.\n2. Low severity: Information disclosure in error messages.\n\nPlease verify if the current `Strictness` policy in `GsonBuilder` mitigates the DoS risk by limiting recursion depth or nesting levels. If not, propose a patch to `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` or `TypeAdapters` to cap the depth. For the info disclosure, check `JsonSyntaxException` and `JsonIOException` to see if stack traces or internal paths are leaked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d662065a6f8db87", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:6e42b7fdca5e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0341771-a65a-47ad-bfe1-960d1c86681b"}}
{"id": "942c322253cc9725", "prompt": "Run a quick check to see if the metrics benchmark is currently running in the background. I can't seem to start a new one.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "942c322253cc9725", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "gson:18714a05ffe9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22b974d3-284e-4974-a110-d80b6a019e46"}}
{"id": "c227d89e85d2215a", "prompt": "In `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonIOException.java`, update the default error message to include 'The JSON document is malformed' instead of the current generic message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c227d89e85d2215a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "gson:038a65d9fa1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6422390a-ed08-4114-b94e-45dcc29ce9d0"}}
{"id": "9dcd788e476c4023", "prompt": "I ran `zizmor` on this repo and it flagged `artipacked` in the GitHub Actions workflows. Looking at the recent commit `119818b Address https://docs.zizmor.sh/audits/#artipacked findings. (#3081)`, it seems this was already addressed, but can you double-check if any workflow files still use `actions/checkout` without `persist-credentials: false`? Also, check `test-graal-native-image` and `test-jpms` directories—are there any hardcoded tokens or API keys in their pom.xml or source files?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9dcd788e476c4023", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:4100f487c7f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78fad8c8-f5a7-47c7-acf6-f6678aa13599"}}
{"id": "eb55d2e3a4bc7206", "prompt": "git blame gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonParser.java", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the specific commit that introduced the change on line 45?"}, {"prompt": "Who was the last person to touch the JsonStreamParser implementation?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eb55d2e3a4bc7206", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:25f6af68c3fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "859cbfd8-28c2-4065-9e22-6f1fb54b46c9"}}
{"id": "4b68f5686173fc5e", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of refactoring `GsonBuilder.java` but it's not working yet. Can you stash my current work so I can switch to the `main` branch and check something?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b68f5686173fc5e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:8c43302da41f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "03ef4ac1-75f7-4488-aa01-bc357862cccc"}}
{"id": "4af1cf0993670bac", "prompt": "`JsonNullTest` is failing on my local environment (JDK 21) but passing on CI (JDK 17). The error is:\n\n```java\njava.lang.IllegalStateException: JsonNull cannot be compared directly\n```\n\nIt seems like the equality check in `JsonNull` is calling `toString()` which might be different across versions or there's a cached value issue. \n\nCan you look at `JsonNullTest.java` and the implementation of `JsonNull`? Also, check if `JsonPrimitive` equality logic needs to be stricter for `null` values.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4af1cf0993670bac", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:c56629720b25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80aa3380-ee04-4993-a9f2-22e451dc80e9"}}
{"id": "103b4afdd176d0f7", "prompt": "I'm trying to configure Gson to handle floating point numbers differently. The docs mention `ToNumberStrategy` and `LongSerializationPolicy`, but I can't find a specific example for converting all doubles to strings to avoid precision issues. Can you check the official Gson documentation on how to set a global `ToNumberStrategy` via `GsonBuilder`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "103b4afdd176d0f7", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:acd684d44db8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5155f8b2-47c2-4572-8463-4c999ed82c55"}}
{"id": "0f6cb4f3bc84db9b", "prompt": "Please bump the version number in the README and the maven pom files to 2.14.1-SNAPSHOT.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0f6cb4f3bc84db9b", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:d510aec8ab05", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a91620a4-e90c-4338-82b3-eee6be84975a"}}
{"id": "a7f69e58e243117d", "prompt": "Can you look up the Gson troubleshooting guide for Android? I'm getting runtime crashes like 'java.lang.NoSuchFieldException' after enabling R8 shrinking, even though I thought I added the right proguard rules. What does the official recommendation say about `ReflectionAccessFilter` in modern Android builds?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a7f69e58e243117d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:4bb638017c5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6ed7963-9f00-4d39-9535-98d3315d10ec"}}
{"id": "8ddf49249175ce3d", "prompt": "The `gson/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/gson.pro` file is getting messy. I need to audit it. Can you extract every unique class pattern that is being kept (`-keep class ...`)? I need a deduplicated list of exactly which Gson internal packages are explicitly preserved. Also, check `test-shrinker/common.pro` and `test-shrinker/proguard.pro` to see if there are any conflicting or redundant rules there.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now that you have the list, cross-reference it with the actual source files provided. Are we keeping `com.google.gson.internal.bind.JsonTreeWriter` even though it's only used for tree-model tests? Just flag the ones that seem like over-keep."}, {"prompt": "Check if `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/extras/examples/rawcollections/RawCollectionsExample.java` is actually included in any of those proguard keep rules. It looks like it's not, but I want to be sure before I remove it from the extras module."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8ddf49249175ce3d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "gson:0f01e79e6b71", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2a97492-7ab0-4a0a-ac2a-cce6d6aeda1a"}}
{"id": "68e4b6c9203ee856", "prompt": "Hey, can you add a new test case to `gson/src/test/java/com/google/gson/functional/StringTest.java` that verifies how it handles deeply nested JSON strings? Once that's working, create a new branch called `feature/nested-string-tests` and commit the change.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, before you commit, can you make sure you're following the existing testing pattern used in that file? After that, go ahead and commit it to the new branch with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "68e4b6c9203ee856", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:7b4d599e30e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8180616a-4d54-4a4f-87b1-35a8a9c670e5"}}
{"id": "f1ddcb2e6b329b6b", "prompt": "Find me the implementation of `JsonTreeWriter`. I need to know how it handles escaping characters. Specifically, where does the string escaping logic live?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f1ddcb2e6b329b6b", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:f506415a8a79", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7cd10b25-cecc-41c6-b98c-32a446611bba"}}
{"id": "d7c6d239bca1582f", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `extras/src/main/java/com/google/gson/interceptors/InterceptorFactory.java` but it's a mess right now. Can you look at my current uncommitted changes, split them into two logical commits—one for the factory logic and one for the new interface—and then commit them to a new branch named `fix/interceptor-refactor`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wait, I think I made a mistake in the last commit. Can you amend the last commit to include the missing import for `JsonPostDeserializer`?"}, {"prompt": "Can you also revert that second commit if it breaks the build?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7c6d239bca1582f", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "gson:784b99df8150", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "702d26f4-8512-43df-a017-48082505a62a"}}
{"id": "0ea2c03b913c551e", "prompt": "Can you audit the dependencies in the root pom.xml and the submodules (metrics, proto, test-jpms, test-shrinker)? I want to make sure we aren't pulling in anything with known vulnerabilities.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ea2c03b913c551e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "gson:7fb1149a9d90", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d533231d-6285-4b0d-b1b9-7762a7338202"}}
{"id": "accf3df08a5dd295", "prompt": "We need to ensure backward compatibility for `JsonObject` and `JsonArray`. Please check the current implementation of `LinkedTreeMap` and `JsonArray` list views to see if the recent quadratic performance fix (#3115) introduced any regressions in the `JsonArrayAsListSuiteTest`. Also, verify that `JsonObjectAsMapTest` still passes with the new strictness policies. If any tests fail, fix them.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the diff for the `JsonArray` changes."}, {"prompt": "Are there any other tests in `functional/` that rely on the old iterator behavior?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "accf3df08a5dd295", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:8a707268ab50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "73893b16-1c9e-4128-9f97-dad65ec08e29"}}
{"id": "75c3ac3d0ff7f857", "prompt": "版本要从 2.14.0 升成 2.15.0-SNAPSHOT。请帮我找到所有硬编码版本号的地方并更新，包括 pom.xml 和文档里的。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "75c3ac3d0ff7f857", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "gson:316c867c1170", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0787624-e431-4571-8513-141bbed1b274"}}
{"id": "6e42cfe88ef3deca", "prompt": "I need to draft release notes for version 2.15.0. Based on the recent commits in the README, summarize the key bug fixes and improvements, specifically highlighting the JDK 25 support and the JSON path updates.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make it more concise for a GitHub release description."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6e42cfe88ef3deca", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "gson:ec353cd13a44", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "957e1367-eab4-48ce-9096-786240dfa0d6"}}
{"id": "63f6d10cd76fd351", "prompt": "Find the commit where the 'reject unpaired surrogates' fix was implemented.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63f6d10cd76fd351", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:4c880f34d543", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "244ca701-db0b-4de6-9100-ccae94e256e8"}}
{"id": "950b4730dd6c749e", "prompt": "Look through the recent commit logs for 'reject unpaired surrogates'. I know commit 8b4b550 mentions it. Which file implements this check and how does it detect unpaired surrogates in the JSON stream?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the test case that validates this strict behavior."}, {"prompt": "Is this part of the default parser behavior or configurable?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "950b4730dd6c749e", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:df0db57a3c72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0250200c-7d2b-4347-a792-505651d2041d"}}
{"id": "c8fb250a69d81fbe", "prompt": "I'm seeing a `JsonIOException` being thrown when parsing a stream. Where in the codebase is this exception actually raised during the reading phase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8fb250a69d81fbe", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:8f8e8ad015d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5f42e60-89cf-4517-bc40-920645986a93"}}
{"id": "e9d30f56b48e35e5", "prompt": "The `FieldNamingPolicy` is not respecting the `SerializedName` annotation when combined with `FieldNamingPolicy.IDENTITY`.\n\nExample:\n```java\nclass MyBean {\n    @SerializedName(\"customName\")\n    public String myField;\n}\n```\n\nWhen I do `new GsonBuilder().setFieldNamingPolicy(FieldNamingPolicy.IDENTITY).create().toJson(new MyBean())`, the output is `{\"myField\": ...}` instead of `{\"customName\": ...}`.\n\nPlease check `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/Excluder.java` or wherever naming is resolved and ensure `SerializedName` takes precedence over the policy.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9d30f56b48e35e5", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:60adc190db5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83acca44-e350-44ff-b859-360fe73ead0f"}}
{"id": "4d6836e8a24a4e81", "prompt": "I'm seeing warnings in my build about Gson not being compatible with Android shrinking. The README mentions Kotlin Serialization or ProGuard rules as solutions. What exactly are those ProGuard rules for Gson and where should I put them?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4d6836e8a24a4e81", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "gson:cf3196da91fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d844851-6d05-489e-8813-646e9f60d32d"}}
{"id": "8f770ad6a8208647", "prompt": "Explain how `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` works. I need to implement polymorphic serialization for a hierarchy of classes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8f770ad6a8208647", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:a5685fcaf8cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55b39180-9e5c-43af-b319-2df66a4573a6"}}
{"id": "ca5a4ef465709f0d", "prompt": "Where is the strictness validation logic that rejects unpaired surrogates in JSON strings located? I saw a commit for it recently.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ca5a4ef465709f0d", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "gson:682d21cf9678", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dc62ed0-ca02-420d-bc83-beb7c0be8d21"}}
{"id": "795bc8e659aaa79a", "prompt": "I'm looking at `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory`. We have this pattern of manually creating field modifiers and checking exclusions scattered across `findJavaLangFieldNamingPolicy`, `newFieldMember`, and the reflection logic. It's getting cluttered.\n\nCan you refactor the field filtering and naming logic into private helper methods within `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` itself? I want to see:\n1. A method that handles the `Excluder` logic and returns a list of `Member` objects that passed.\n2. A method that applies the `FieldNamingPolicy` to the JSON names.\n\nKeep the public API of the adapter factory the same, just clean up the internals in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "795bc8e659aaa79a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "gson:b49767db2634", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "664c7e85-d018-4cd4-8f34-1e88333afa9e"}}
{"id": "d24ad51a59e9a8e6", "prompt": "How does `ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory` decide which fields to include when serializing an object?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d24ad51a59e9a8e6", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:97f698aeead8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c429ec7e-c778-4c8d-be70-91ee87c84f78"}}
{"id": "027522a7fe7e0782", "prompt": "I read somewhere that Google recommends against using Gson for new Android projects in favor of Kotlin Serialization. Can you pull up the current official stance from the Gson README or blog? Specifically, I want to quote the section about why Gson's runtime reflection is problematic for Android shrinkers. I need to explain this to my team.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "027522a7fe7e0782", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "gson:de1d9d88c818", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f72958df-f300-40eb-826b-bfd1a7d9ff38"}}
{"id": "7c72ac349cb1afbf", "prompt": "Run `trufflehog` on the git history. I suspect there might be old API keys or GCP service account keys committed before we moved to CI-only secrets. Ignore `.git-blame-ignore-revs` and `README` files, but scan everything else including `extras/` and `metrics/`. If you find anything, list the file path and commit hash.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7c72ac349cb1afbf", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "gson:b7b22281e389", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6925c69d-6caf-4918-a1b7-79ca664bc5fc"}}
{"id": "9c41410ee62c2004", "prompt": "I'm seeing a crash when deserializing a JSON array containing nulls mixed with objects in my project using Gson.\n\nHere is the stack trace:\n```\ncom.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected STRING but was NULL\n  at com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters$36.read(TypeAdapters.java:980)\n  ...\n```\nThe JSON looks like: `[\"value\", null, \"value2\"]`\n\nLooking at `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/TypeAdapters.java`, the string adapter seems to choke on the null element before it can even check if the whole array is an array of strings. Shouldn't it handle the null case gracefully based on the `@Nullable` context or standard JSON null handling? Please fix `TypeAdapters` to support this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9c41410ee62c2004", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:55d3eb0338c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d4e5e2c-c975-45bb-a41f-374491c474ce"}}
{"id": "74c8b8239a63c5c8", "prompt": "Hey, `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` is registering the wrong type for my wildcard generic. \n\nI have `class Container<T extends Number>`. When I serialize `Container<Integer>` and then deserialize, Gson picks up the type as `Object` or something weird instead of `Integer` because of the wildcard handling in the internal constructor.\n\nSee commit `698ba9e` which mentions using runtime type for wildcard element types. Is that fix fully applied to `RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory` too? It feels like it's still falling back to the erasure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "74c8b8239a63c5c8", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "gson:8dee739dd65e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "509c994c-0a37-4909-a5a5-f76bcce2a375"}}
{"id": "3a5e6ffbfe3f725c", "prompt": "The `LegacyProtoTypeAdapterFactory` is causing issues with bitfield parsing in some legacy proto files. Please review `LegacyProtoTypeAdapterFactoryTest` and the regex pattern mentioned in commit `17b1d9a`. Update the regex to handle the new proto2 structures in `json_test_proto2.proto` and ensure `ProtosWithAnnotationsTest` still passes. Don't break the existing `StructTypeAdapterTest`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3a5e6ffbfe3f725c", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "gson:fafcd04183fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "126eefbb-b9e6-4967-a3ad-817c066121c7"}}
{"id": "10e37ef5aba29286", "prompt": "Compare the changes in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/JsonParser.java` between the current version and the state at commit 8fe0778.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "10e37ef5aba29286", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "gson:c33f7021768a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04afafc9-6b82-4688-a976-8fa3e924c954"}}
{"id": "fdcc1119ea559ed2", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with date parsing. How is `DefaultDateTypeAdapter` implemented in `gson/src/main/java/com/google/gson/internal/bind/DefaultDateTypeAdapter.java`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fdcc1119ea559ed2", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "gson:fc8b4ef52363", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d69ed65-7352-48d4-86ab-60cd30168ad1"}}
{"id": "e7abe6914423bc3a", "prompt": "请检查 Android Developers 官方文档中关于 JSON 库的建议页面，看看是否已经明确警告不要在 Android 生产环境使用 Gson，或者是否有新的替代方案推荐。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e7abe6914423bc3a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:4d117b391586", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "549744f8-6be1-45e2-bb6c-f9a0df7892fe"}}
{"id": "b552231feeba076a", "prompt": "访问 Maven Central 仓库，看看 com.google.code.gson:gson:2.14.0 的最新稳定版本是否仍然有效，或者是否有更新的发布版本。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b552231feeba076a", "repo": "gson", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "gson:b4547f8403a7", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "gson-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6cd48337-3db4-4aff-b1a9-a3e5984e2bba"}}
{"id": "86f2dfb77b360a1c", "prompt": "Compara el commit b5addb6 con el anterior para ver los cambios exactos en la decodificación de texto.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "86f2dfb77b360a1c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:346d7a7d0f15", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9cb45910-6f84-49d6-a8e9-4e0ae37991e9"}}
{"id": "9c7ce307eb25e4bf", "prompt": "Run the linter and fix any issues it finds. I want a clean slate before I push this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9c7ce307eb25e4bf", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:e74f01b951c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd36b14a-a479-4404-84ac-8f15f597148c"}}
{"id": "716990bccec4801f", "prompt": "Explain the difference between using the top-level functions like httpx.get() and instantiating a httpx.Client(). When should I stick to the API functions versus the Client object?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "716990bccec4801f", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:322fa81079a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3daa67e4-bee8-430a-bad7-d29b3b58cfd7"}}
{"id": "b3ec3e0a66d11abf", "prompt": "I have a zip archive `httpx-0.28.1.zip` in the root. Can you help me extract it and count how many Python files are inside the extracted folder? I want to verify the distribution size. Don't actually execute the extraction if it's too heavy, just estimate based on the manifest if available, otherwise just tell me the total file count in the repo root vs the expected dist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b3ec3e0a66d11abf", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:84418036802f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb360aa2-8fad-4a4a-b47a-a61cc71c484e"}}
{"id": "397c83d7b78cf047", "prompt": "check tests/client/test_async_client.py, I'm getting a weird type error on line 142. Can you tell me what type signature for 'request' is expected here versus what I'm passing?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "397c83d7b78cf047", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:b39f80a5c567", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6e484403-8037-41d8-b524-9331218a5b54"}}
{"id": "b98e0f37f7196142", "prompt": "I want to see what happens if we upgrade `mypy`. We recently bumped it in the commits, but I want to be sure we aren't missing any type errors in `httpx/_types.py` or `httpx/_models.py` due to stricter checking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b98e0f37f7196142", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:4633cd37933e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a47c6c2-8e09-4356-a80b-0d4b8db7289b"}}
{"id": "5bf1147edc53202a", "prompt": "Vite, j'ai fait une erreur dans ma dernière modification sur `httpx/_client.py`. Annule le dernier commit immédiatement.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5bf1147edc53202a", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:4bd38753b8a9", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f323c3f4-fa5e-4907-9e15-86c14c4306ba"}}
{"id": "b13aba69b033379a", "prompt": "Bug report: `httpx.Request` strips the `Host` header if it's not explicitly provided in the headers dict, but the URL contains a non-standard port.\n\nCode:\n```python\nimport httpx\n\nreq = httpx.Request('GET', 'http://example.com:8080/path')\nprint(req.headers) # Host is missing!\n```\n\nIt should definitely include `Host: example.com:8080`. Right now if I inspect the request on the server side, it defaults to just `Host: example.com` which breaks some virtual host configurations. \n\nCheck `httpx/_urls.py` where the URL is parsed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b13aba69b033379a", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:3b60148bab52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1fcca17b-1b50-437e-859e-db0670dce356"}}
{"id": "b252b69772b55f96", "prompt": "where's the retry logic? I thought I saw it in the transports but I can't find it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b252b69772b55f96", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:f86931d865ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d59cedb-c69b-4145-9a26-263b496e7c25"}}
{"id": "36b307e7bf62bd50", "prompt": "Check if the httpbin.org service is online by sending a GET request to https://httpbin.org/get. I expect a 200 OK. If it returns a 503 or times out, let me know immediately as it affects our integration tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "36b307e7bf62bd50", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:13e74fea0a42", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1614b7d7-7e30-44c8-a50b-c64b3f84c45a"}}
{"id": "47fc59fd43385c48", "prompt": "We're seeing some weird behavior with multipart uploads. I need a multi-pronged investigation:\n- Look at `httpx/_multipart.py` to see how we handle boundary generation.\n- Check `tests/test_multipart.py` to see if our test coverage for large file streams is sufficient.\n- Verify that `httpx/_content.py` isn't doing unnecessary copies of the body before it hits the transport.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "47fc59fd43385c48", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:0290871684ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31c798b4-e371-407c-b54f-6a1d9b438e85"}}
{"id": "7e9f3c35435923d9", "prompt": "I want to improve the developer experience for configuring timeouts. \n- Review `httpx/_config.py` for how timeout settings are stored.\n- Update `httpx/_api.py` to ensure the timeout parameter is consistently handled in the top-level API calls.\n- Add a couple of regression tests in `tests/test_timeouts.py` covering the new default timeout behavior.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7e9f3c35435923d9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:e8593df54934", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c1de173-e6ca-4be8-9abe-91ae1b989b92"}}
{"id": "a725e2d6cbbc92c0", "prompt": "Olá, estou com uma dúvida sobre a biblioteca `httpcore` que é a base do httpx. Pode verificar na documentação oficial do httpcore qual é a diferença exata entre `timeout=None` e `timeout={", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a725e2d6cbbc92c0", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:2c72d1b38167", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8af52a72-ed8d-4f6b-8737-d19e4e69d206"}}
{"id": "d4c5439b97598daa", "prompt": "Look at `pyproject.toml` and see if we can move `httpdbg` from an optional dependency to a required one for development. Also, check if `scripts/test` needs any modifications to support this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d4c5439b97598daa", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:371611770587", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3409b770-d683-4f53-9ce2-e200e13ca564"}}
{"id": "abc636b2e6918957", "prompt": "Does httpx support HTTP/2 by default, or is that an optional dependency like in requests?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "abc636b2e6918957", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:70d9137b5afb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c71faf47-7140-4a21-98c9-28db43481b28"}}
{"id": "05174734e20ee37e", "prompt": "The `httpx.Client.post` method is silently swallowing `ConnectTimeout` exceptions in some network error scenarios. \n\nWhen I use a local ASGI app via `ASGITransport`, and the app hangs (timeout), I expect a `httpx.ReadTimeout` or `httpx.ConnectTimeout`. Instead, I'm getting a generic `RuntimeError: Connection error` from `httpcore` that isn't being re-raised as an `httpx` exception properly in the sync wrapper.\n\nStack trace:\n```python\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/app/main.py\", line 25, in test_app\n    response = client.post('/slow-endpoint', timeout=0.1)\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 1089, in post\n    return self.request(\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 820, in request\n    return self.send(request, auth=auth, follow_redirects=follow_redirects)\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 905, in send\n    response = self._send_handling_auth(\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 933, in _send_handling_auth\n    response = self._send_handling_redirects(\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 964, in _send_handling_redirects\n    response = self._send_single_request(request)\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_client.py\", line 1000, in _send_single_request\n    response = transport.handle_request(request)\n  File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_transports/asgi.py\", line 73, in handle_request\n    scope, receive, send = ... \nKeyError: 'type'\n```\n\nActually, wait, looking closer, it's a `KeyError` in `asgi.py`, not a timeout. The `scope` dict is missing 'type'. I'm using `httpx.ASGITransport(app=app)`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Please fix the ASGI transport in `httpx/_transports/asgi.py` to ensure `scope` is properly constructed before calling the app."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "05174734e20ee37e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:0a24eee9868c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05bacc4e-0c59-414c-b4d5-a313b83f9652"}}
{"id": "3551563a9ca85be5", "prompt": "Add a new parameter `timeout_seconds` to the `httpx.Client` constructor in `httpx/_client.py` that allows setting a global timeout for all requests, defaulting to None.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3551563a9ca85be5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:2b9f5036190b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "22cb3f6d-de86-45bf-b089-711edd065911"}}
{"id": "48a577c64656654e", "prompt": "I'm seeing some linting issues in `httpx/_api.py`. Run the linting script and then fix whatever it flags regarding unused imports.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests after fixing the imports to make sure nothing broke."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "48a577c64656654e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:466b8a7c352f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ae8d26f7-5ca6-4a54-843a-8c593eab0be0"}}
{"id": "06d47cf55ec2c453", "prompt": "Check the current CVE database for any high-severity vulnerabilities in httpx. Search for CVEs related to 'httpx' with severity 'high' or 'critical'. List them if found.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06d47cf55ec2c453", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:2cbc0ebf57f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb644498-b09c-4b4c-afda-2838eefad5b0"}}
{"id": "3b5265445d5f150e", "prompt": "run scripts/lint", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3b5265445d5f150e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:7d3c17903bf8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbef2092-7e9e-4106-bbcc-8002d5ae32d2"}}
{"id": "6c5cf6b5d9bc8578", "prompt": "I'm seeing this traceback in tests/test_decoders.py:\n\n> UnsupportedCharset: 'cp037' is not in the chardet character set list.\n\nI just upgraded chardet to 6.0.0. According to the chardet changelog or docs, did they remove this encoding? How should I update my decoder logic in httpx/_decoders.py to handle this?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6c5cf6b5d9bc8578", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:e84aa5afa9d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "03b303b0-67e8-43e7-8151-b97520cbb909"}}
{"id": "0498f30353444696", "prompt": "I'm planning to release `0.28.2`. Please bump the version number in `httpx/__version__.py` and run the `scripts/sync-version` script to ensure consistency across the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0498f30353444696", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:802dae08f3c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fec5a497-0923-4a33-a171-da28342d7be1"}}
{"id": "9258a2e80de76e3c", "prompt": "Hi, I think there's a bug in `httpx.Request` headers handling when merging headers.\n\nIf I pass headers with mixed casing and duplicate keys (upper/lower case), the resulting `Headers` object doesn't preserve the order correctly for `requests`-compatible code, but more importantly, it seems to drop headers if the key is present in both `default_headers` and `extra_headers` with different casing.\n\nExample:\n```python\nimport httpx\n\n# default_headers has 'Accept: application/json'\n# extra_headers has 'accept: text/html'\n\nc = httpx.Client(default_headers={'Accept': 'application/json'})\nreq = httpx.Request('GET', 'https://example.com', headers={'accept': 'text/html'})\n```\n\nI expect `accept: text/html` to override. But in the internal `_merge` or `Headers` class, it seems like case-insensitivity is applied too late or incorrectly during the merge, resulting in BOTH headers being sent, or the wrong one sticking.\n\nCan you check `httpx/_models.py` in the `Request` initialization?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you fix this in the `Headers` class in `httpx/_models.py`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9258a2e80de76e3c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:89cdc7db3352", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7cb2f7c-6d81-4dcf-9015-8b86b10e124e"}}
{"id": "76a1ff08739685e9", "prompt": "Lista todas las ramas locales y remotas para ver si hay alguna de desarrollo para el soporte de Python 3.13.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "76a1ff08739685e9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:3ed96a4d6095", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8ef9fddb-6eac-45f6-87b1-4bce9c1d657e"}}
{"id": "93019871e262c7f5", "prompt": "E aí. Estou vendo no `pyproject.toml` que a versão mínima do Python é 3.9. Você pode me dar o link da release mais recente do httpx no PyPI para eu confirmar se essa restrição é atual? Estou preocupado se o projeto abandonou o 3.8 e estou em uma legacy app.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "93019871e262c7f5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:e620279908d4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7bbb07e1-8747-4604-b36b-783dd4e9ce18"}}
{"id": "df0689c20f68d972", "prompt": "Estou vendo um `ConnectionError` sendo levantado aqui. Me mostra o código onde essa exceção é gerada no transporte padrão? Quero saber se há alguma lógica de retry lá antes de lançar.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "E onde isso é tratado globalmente?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "df0689c20f68d972", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:a5c27660d1bb", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8d5d6ba9-2d91-4ad9-a667-e6556f0bc248"}}
{"id": "489642ace71dea29", "prompt": "Running bandit on the repo is returning too many false positives for the mock transports. Here is the output:\n\n```bash\n$ bandit httpx\n[B104] Possible binding to all interfaces:\n  File \"httpx/_transports/mock.py\", line 45, in <module>\n    SERVER_ADDRESS = '0.0.0.0'\n\nIgnore these. However, flag anything involving `subprocess` calls in `_main.py` or string formatting in `_urlparse.py`. Those are my high-risk areas.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "489642ace71dea29", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:0c830b64e263", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "537238b8-d037-4830-be66-5eac0c8ff5f2"}}
{"id": "2a8b2c27d4d92dde", "prompt": "where's the timeout config?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2a8b2c27d4d92dde", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:a8e19cb502c2", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fb5cef50-064f-43b5-815e-8601a6bccb9b"}}
{"id": "2bd72ea1158aba87", "prompt": "Can you audit `httpx/_multipart.py`? I suspect we might be leaking file handles if an exception occurs during the chunked upload. Also check `httpx/_transports/asgi.py` for any potential ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) in the header parsing logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2bd72ea1158aba87", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:ee732fbe870b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c150b94-45d2-41fb-8714-d3a813842860"}}
{"id": "428c84d6f128bb3e", "prompt": "Can you explain how `httpx/_multipart.py` constructs the body for a multipart file upload?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "428c84d6f128bb3e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:f59c28b69dad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c4345df-759a-4a9c-a0d2-0d2189210ce0"}}
{"id": "bcbab0d8bdd5547f", "prompt": "We need to add `httpx-retries` to our project. Update `pyproject.toml` to include it and let me know if there are any potential conflicts with our existing transport implementations in `httpx/_transports/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bcbab0d8bdd5547f", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:1c1891da8a7c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfa31f18-f738-43e9-8d2c-511474896fde"}}
{"id": "21446e269e789282", "prompt": "We are integrating a new secret scanning tool (like trufflehog) into our CI. I need a baseline of what 'noise' we should expect. Can you look through `tests/` and `scripts/` for any hardcoded passwords, AWS keys, or private keys? I want to whitelist these so the CI doesn't fail on false positives.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Create a list of file paths and regex patterns to exclude from the scan."}, {"prompt": "Double-check `tests/models/whatwg.json` just in case there are test credentials sitting in the JSON fixtures."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "21446e269e789282", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:742af9acd1cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fcc3ecbf-1d97-4268-9e9a-13ac2cae0b5e"}}
{"id": "95f30de21c6befe7", "prompt": "Why does `httpx.Response.read()` fail with `ValueError: Cannot call read() if stream is exhausted` when I don't explicitly read the stream first?\n\n```python\nresponse = httpx.get('https://httpbin.org/bytes/1024')\nprint(response.read()) # Works\nprint(response.read()) # ValueError\n```\n\nI understand I shouldn't call it twice, but the error message implies the stream *was* already exhausted, which is confusing since I haven't touched it yet in the second call. Actually, wait, the first call consumes it. My bad. But why does it raise ValueError instead of returning empty bytes or re-reading if possible?\n\nNever mind, I see `response.read()` consumes the stream. Please ignore this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "95f30de21c6befe7", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:15d5c7608276", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95cef63a-8c0b-48c6-8e53-d13c70a49355"}}
{"id": "2c1903a470ec3fe4", "prompt": "Find where the default timeout values are set. I see a default timeout in the docs but I can't find where it's defined in the source. Also, does it override anything in _client.py?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2c1903a470ec3fe4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:284be39299be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "03b040d1-1907-4694-8bb2-3a29a288be58"}}
{"id": "e2d7c8d66cca3a82", "prompt": "Hey, I'm looking at `httpx._status_codes` and I see we have a mapping for `418`. Is this officially part of the HTTPx status code registry now? I'm trying to determine if we should be supporting this in our custom exception handling code or if it's just a legacy artifact. Check the latest IANA registry or httpx's own docs to confirm if 418 is still classified as a standard error code or if it's deprecated/ignored in modern clients.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Got it. So should I update `test_status_codes.py` to expect a warning for 418?"}, {"prompt": "Wait, does the W3C still maintain that? Just want to be sure before I change the test expectations."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e2d7c8d66cca3a82", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:05719a42d372", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7454e5b0-8984-4dfe-892f-d34a1291eab2"}}
{"id": "4c730111fdcb4d00", "prompt": "Can you add a basic test case to `tests/test_exceptions.py` that ensures `httpx.HTTPError` is properly raised when a connection is refused?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c730111fdcb4d00", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:94a187cf4a39", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dedcc895-3ac2-47c5-afdc-607e8c5848ab"}}
{"id": "8ad8d964efa045c5", "prompt": "Olá, estou recebendo um erro `UnsupportedProtocol` quando tento conectar em um servidor local. A mensagem diz que o protocolo não é suportado, mas estou usando http://. Alguém sabe se isso está explicado nos FAQs ou na documentação de troubleshooting do httpx? Às vezes parece ser relacionado ao transport padrão.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8ad8d964efa045c5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:b6122c41ff81", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9508c4f-2998-4511-9924-36aafdd4f4b5"}}
{"id": "d0d1be69e897ef75", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest commits for httpx. We're pushing a release candidate. Can you do a quick security scan of the codebase? Specifically look at `httpx/_auth.py`, `httpx/_transports/default.py`, and `httpx/_client.py`. I'm worried about hardcoded credentials or improper handling of secrets in the config loading.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the hardcoded TLS verification warning in _config.py, can you patch it to use a constant instead of a string literal?"}, {"prompt": "Also check the test files in tests/client/test_auth.py to make sure no test fixtures are leaking real API keys."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0d1be69e897ef75", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:0eeddc01ce7a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5dd523a0-3fab-4738-ad9a-bf1b584925e2"}}
{"id": "7a527cebf4802ccb", "prompt": "Peux-tu modifier `httpx/_status_codes.py` pour ajouter une constante pour le code HTTP 451 ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Super. Amende le dernier commit pour inclure cette nouvelle constante sans changer le message de commit."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7a527cebf4802ccb", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:2be6721ad09a", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a16c52d-d39b-4749-a65c-7f9fbc240a00"}}
{"id": "22cc76d9df5b0789", "prompt": "Implement support for `FollowRedirects` in `httpx.Client` constructor.\n\nCurrently I have to do:\n```python\ncurrent_client = httpx.Client()\n# ... make requests ...\nnew_client = httpx.Client(follow_redirects=False)\n```\n\nI want to be able to instantiate with `follow_redirects=False` directly. Also ensure the `__init__.py` exports the necessary types if they aren't already.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure to update the type hints in `httpx/_client.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22cc76d9df5b0789", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:f3464c3ed3d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6330147-8783-4fac-88f7-ae24ab1a3273"}}
{"id": "19c262605213c93b", "prompt": "```\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/home/user/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_transports/default.py\", line 62, in map_httpcore_exceptions\n    yield\n  File \"/home/user/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_transports/default.py\", line 210, in handle_request\n    resp = self._pool.handle_request(req)\n  File \"/home/user/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/httpx/_transports/default.py\", line 218, in handle_async_request\n    resp = await self._pool.handle_async_request(req)\nAttributeError: 'SSLSession' object has no attribute 'handle_async_request'\n```\n\nI'm using httpx 0.24.x (async) and trying to make a POST request. It seems like `httpx.Client` is somehow creating an `SSLSession` object where it expects an httpcore transport pool or similar. \n\nIs this a known bug with SSL session reuse? Here is my minimal reproduction:\n```python\nimport httpx\nimport asyncio\n\nasync def main():\n    async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:\n        await client.get('https://httpbin.org/get')\n        await client.get('https://httpbin.org/get')\n\nasyncio.run(main())\n```\" \n\nIt fails on the second request, or sometimes the first, if I have some custom config.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "19c262605213c93b", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:11dbe3380bc3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53c0aba8-32fa-4cd2-af72-296a7c4e33ee"}}
{"id": "184ca9a964449224", "prompt": "Show me a summary of commits from today only. I'm doing a standup update and need to know what changed in the last 24 hours.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "184ca9a964449224", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:cbcc248481fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8aefdb5-6949-4535-9083-29eb22306a35"}}
{"id": "ef899604c5a0f980", "prompt": "Does httpx automatically handle cookie persistence across requests like the requests library does?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ef899604c5a0f980", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:e7c785e71983", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b778b3f4-5a3e-4044-92ec-0bca3e0ca815"}}
{"id": "3ad8d3f112f90c90", "prompt": "Ich habe einen Fehler bei der Authentifizierung. Kannst du mir erklären, wie `httpx/_auth.py` die verschiedenen Auth-Methoden handhabt?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ad8d3f112f90c90", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:512d2c3714d5", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd3145fa-a71d-4f3d-8a5a-333225f3d4e6"}}
{"id": "692665b243c4f652", "prompt": "The type checker is getting noisy. Please:\n1. Review `httpx/_models.py` and `httpx/_types.py` for any `Any` usage that should be more specific.\n2. Check `tests/models/test_url.py` to ensure the test types align with the new URL model changes.\n3. Run the linting scripts to see if there are any Ruff violations introduced by recent dependency updates.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "692665b243c4f652", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:909afe78681b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3cd24933-ea2a-4215-abe4-9f4205005906"}}
{"id": "b59e735ce9d71ac2", "prompt": "The `httpx.Proxy` class doesn't seem to handle usernames and passwords in the URL correctly for HTTP proxies.\n\n```python\nfrom httpx import Proxy\n\nproxy = Proxy(url='http://user:pass@proxy.example.com:8080')\nprint(proxy.target_url) # Expected host:port, got full url? Or crash?\n```\n\nI get a `RequestError` when trying to connect. The proxy URL parsing in `httpx/_transports/default.py` seems to ignore the auth part. Can you fix the proxy URL parsing to strip credentials before setting up the connection?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b59e735ce9d71ac2", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:1739672e7a10", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5bc026b-87be-44d0-acfa-5d08f79f3c13"}}
{"id": "45c307f63cb3f919", "prompt": "Je vais partir en pause, mets le processus de build en pause et réveille-le quand je reviens.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Vérifie si le build a bien redémarré correctement."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "45c307f63cb3f919", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:b38661d5be51", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8c71ade6-4548-4a3e-8c87-24cc72c362c4"}}
{"id": "4a84be157a848186", "prompt": "Look at `mkdocs.yml`. I suspect the navigation structure might be broken. Count how many unique top-level menu items are defined in the `nav` section and list them. Also check if all the markdown files referenced in that nav section actually exist in the `docs/` directory (assuming standard structure, but just check roots if not present).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4a84be157a848186", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:f03364765156", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f5609f5-1332-41a4-ba2c-c1e72fb0386a"}}
{"id": "eba3f5e325d528ad", "prompt": "How does httpx handle timeout configurations globally vs per-request? I want to set a default timeout for all requests in my application but sometimes need to disable timeouts for specific long-running tasks.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there an environment variable that can control this too?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the code to pass a timeout parameter to a single request object."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eba3f5e325d528ad", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:d874dc8ce947", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b2aa33f-799f-4d81-9cbb-9c42ccac1113"}}
{"id": "9e3b675a89756294", "prompt": "Vérifie s'il y a des processus Python qui tournent encore en arrière-plan et qui pourraient bloquer les ports de test.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9e3b675a89756294", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:f627da31f6bb", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2de986c4-0c8a-4c36-b052-f9440f44e0ac"}}
{"id": "abb9f59b62ed8e21", "prompt": "I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior in how we handle multipart uploads. I need you to: 1) Review `httpx/_multipart.py` for any edge cases in body construction. 2) Inspect `tests/test_multipart.py` to see if we're actually testing large file streams vs small buffers. 3) Look at `httpx/_content.py` to ensure the content-length calculation is consistent with the multipart logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "abb9f59b62ed8e21", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:ce0f6842dc07", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c85adcf6-6d4f-4a62-a904-d2f30dd32121"}}
{"id": "c59a1bd136afd21e", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` parameter to the `httpx.Client.__init__` method in `httpx/_client.py` so it can be set at instantiation. Make sure it's also reflected in the type hints in `httpx/_types.py` if necessary.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c59a1bd136afd21e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:7cddffa2e944", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1cd3a234-78fb-493d-94a1-81439feb7871"}}
{"id": "e5ca5d809be506d5", "prompt": "I'm seeing a memory leak in my async client. I'm using `httpx.AsyncClient` to make a burst of requests in a loop. After a few thousand iterations, the process memory usage keeps climbing and never comes back down.\n\nHere is my setup:\n\n```python\nasync with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:\n    for url in urls:\n        await client.get(url)\n```\n\nI suspect it's the connection pool not releasing sockets properly or something related to keep-alive. Can we add connection limits or force close? I can't find a clean way to dispose of the client without exiting the context manager.\n\nAlso, `client.close()` doesn't seem to exist on the instance anymore? Or maybe it's deprecated?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e5ca5d809be506d5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:07e1dbe1a56c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0ce6ce1-96ca-4408-9d70-8d452dc199e5"}}
{"id": "b609932f47032b34", "prompt": "I'm trying to implement a custom auth flow. Can you show me how `httpx/_auth.py` handles authentication requests?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b609932f47032b34", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:1c34bfe1a182", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7fe695fb-b181-4104-986d-ce1c4ba799f7"}}
{"id": "b5745ad5e0c090ee", "prompt": "Alô, estou migrando de `requests` para `httpx`. Na sessão de autenticação do requests, eu usava `Session.auth = HTTPBasicAuth()`. No httpx, estou vendo que o `auth` pode ser um dicionário, uma tupla ou um objeto. Pode me dar a referência da documentação do httpx que explica o comportamento padrão de `auth=('user', 'pass')`? Quero ter certeza de que isso faz Digest Auth também ou só Basic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b5745ad5e0c090ee", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:4fcfdd69a571", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1fee4056-6b61-4682-bb34-bac087c9158d"}}
{"id": "3fddcd28c1f80cf4", "prompt": "I'm trying to configure the HTTP/2 settings in httpx._config.HTTPVersion or similar, but I can't find clear documentation on what valid values or constraints are for the 'h2' version string. Can you check the official h2 library docs or the HTTPX docs to see what's expected here?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3fddcd28c1f80cf4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:9ce699bd97d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ede5252c-e90f-4153-bee4-fa8d942d8f88"}}
{"id": "effcda6c73b561b5", "prompt": "Start the dev server for the docs locally so I can preview the changes I made to `mkdocs.yml`. I want to see how the new SSL_CERT_FILE section looks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "effcda6c73b561b5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:34a5590260d9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75d55172-2c5d-4c5b-b09f-dd4c5d46616e"}}
{"id": "f583ec3ac9a47ec6", "prompt": "Onde a classe `Request` está definida? Preciso ver a assinatura completa do construtor para entender quais kwargs são aceitas.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f583ec3ac9a47ec6", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:935d1a8f9015", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1211713c-eafe-4f37-9204-e7345c634094"}}
{"id": "6ed0857cab7c1d7e", "prompt": "I'm looking at httpx/_transports/default.py. Who calls the send method? I need to know if the synchronous Client wraps it or if it's called directly by the sync API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6ed0857cab7c1d7e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:254f23e8c9f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6070f171-9963-4183-a701-6ec32ce57d7b"}}
{"id": "0ba55faad2f185ac", "prompt": "I'm worried about our URL parsing logic. 1) Review `httpx/_urlparse.py` and `httpx/_urls.py` for compliance with the latest WHATWG standards. 2) Check if `tests/models/test_whatwg.py` covers the specific edge cases mentioned in the recent RFC updates. 3) Verify if any changes in `httpx/_models.py` are impacting how `URL` objects are instantiated.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ba55faad2f185ac", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:dde55790a69c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "34db4433-61f3-4703-a60c-8dafaeeea70c"}}
{"id": "6c201cd5ae2eee63", "prompt": "We need to prepare for the next minor release. Please perform the following: 1) Audit `httpx/_config.py` and `httpx/_client.py` to see if we can consolidate any redundant timeout configurations. 2) Check `tests/client/test_client.py` and `tests/test_api.py` to ensure they are covering the new timeout behaviors. 3) Update `pyproject.toml` if any dependency bumps are required based on our recent security scans.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6c201cd5ae2eee63", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:3c6146f7cb3c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c36cca11-d0b5-4265-a9dd-350139bfbd6e"}}
{"id": "941b22463a154c2d", "prompt": "fix the typo in the SSL documentation mentioned in commit 652f051. It's in the docs folder but I can't find the exact file. Check `mkdocs.yml` and the source files to locate the reference to `SSL_CERT_FILE` and ensure the example code is syntactically correct.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run `mkdocs build` to verify no broken links."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "941b22463a154c2d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:e7fa7931947b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba1183c5-31bf-4bab-a7a8-6b1ad84df2ee"}}
{"id": "65b6d75ae7357243", "prompt": "J'ai commencé à modifier `httpx/_transports/default.py` mais je dois changer de tâche. Met mon travail actuel de côté (stash).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "65b6d75ae7357243", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:6982df38c092", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2b8646d-f08f-42a5-8389-88048ec48c79"}}
{"id": "d13bf6ce01b9fc7c", "prompt": "Könntest du mir den Inhalt von `httpx/_models.py` erklären? Mich interessiert besonders, wie die Response-Modelle definiert sind.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d13bf6ce01b9fc7c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:54b770ea51d6", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc72bc57-42d5-4a19-a227-80795677fd9e"}}
{"id": "a44f401be6135b06", "prompt": "Wait, I'm not ready to commit these changes to `httpx/_api.py` yet. I need to go to a meeting. Stash my current work so I can switch back to main.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I'm back. Restore my work from the stash and let's keep going with the refactor."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a44f401be6135b06", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:c550318cec25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb499efb-c1b7-44d9-8ef5-551264ccdbb3"}}
{"id": "897642d06b120b0e", "prompt": "Quiero ver el historial de cambios en httpx/_auth.py para entender por qué se expuso FunctionAuth.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "897642d06b120b0e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:84a3a080ff9a", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "510b8017-24a4-4b99-a37e-4feeeeef8a06"}}
{"id": "b70f9d706917b3a4", "prompt": "The error message for proxy connection failures is a bit vague. Can you find where proxy errors are raised in `httpx/_transports/default.py` or `httpx/_client.py` and update the message to include the proxy URL being used?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b70f9d706917b3a4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:b4db9b904e53", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83fe544b-8a85-47c8-9e78-cb094c442557"}}
{"id": "dc89de56a40af06d", "prompt": "I noticed `FunctionAuth` isn't being exported properly. Can you check `httpx/__init__.py` and ensure it's added to the `__all__` list?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc89de56a40af06d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:47e23db33e13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c4cc02b-ebba-4efa-a061-e7b0cc9d8d32"}}
{"id": "dcae7f36f79b777b", "prompt": "Wie funktioniert das ASGI-Transport-System in `httpx/_transports/asgi.py`? Ich muss wissen, wie Requests an eine ASGI-App weitergereicht werden.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dcae7f36f79b777b", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:d6accdb88fc5", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3415097c-7376-45c0-950c-a62beff01327"}}
{"id": "ffe4666f06d58401", "prompt": "git blame httpx/_client.py para ver quién modificó la clase Client últimamente.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Podrías mostrarme el commit específico de la última modificación en la línea 45 de ese archivo?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ffe4666f06d58401", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:9d9d5e782c61", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c7fc5e8e-2749-4635-91a2-d17788be2beb"}}
{"id": "4954096526f4b959", "prompt": "Can you draft a new entry for CHANGELOG.md for version 0.28.2? I want to highlight the new support for Python 3.13 and the fix for the syntax error in the multipart file upload examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4954096526f4b959", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "httpx:d6c378a428a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "38dffe9c-c9b4-49c7-9a71-dd23dc0a4eb5"}}
{"id": "53c3fb879e9bb426", "prompt": "How does `httpx._auth.py` handle the different authentication schemes? I'm specifically looking for how `FunctionAuth` works since I saw a recent commit about exposing it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "53c3fb879e9bb426", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:4ca2806d7843", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "76aa6318-30e3-4efe-8710-c561a57cc574"}}
{"id": "90969534083c9ddf", "prompt": "The `httpx._transports.mock.MockTransport` isn't handling `Request` objects correctly when I pass a custom `auth` parameter. Looking at `tests/test_auth.py`, the test `test_auth_inheritance` is failing. It looks like `_auth.py` is being called with the wrong request signature. Can you check how the mock transport forwards the request to the auth handler?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Compare this behavior with the default transport implementation in `default.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "90969534083c9ddf", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:64799401d997", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5ce66eb8-520e-4a9d-a0c1-711e3113a591"}}
{"id": "63f44b85ae23650f", "prompt": "I've been messing around with `httpx/_transports/base.py` and `tests/models/test_url.py` but the code is a mess. Can you look at my current changes and split them into two logical commits? One for the transport interface and one for the URL test fixes. Write professional commit messages for both.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63f44b85ae23650f", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:c07e3313a3a3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f37b50e-3828-4422-9821-bbeb27025a06"}}
{"id": "50d911a972ce70a4", "prompt": "Draft the release notes for the upcoming 0.28.2 release. It should include a 'New Features' section for Python 3.13 support and a 'Bug Fixes' section for the multipart upload syntax error.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "50d911a972ce70a4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "httpx:b25e4262eba2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e32f9422-091b-499d-9040-184bfa9c1ec8"}}
{"id": "fa5c953c1b1a07f3", "prompt": "Je suis en train de modifier `httpx/_client.py` mais mon code est instable. Peux-tu mettre mes changements actuels de côté (stash) pour que je puisse revenir à un état propre ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Je suis prêt à reprendre. Récupère mes modifications en stash et si jamais il y a des conflits, aide-moi à les résoudre."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fa5c953c1b1a07f3", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:640191672c12", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8b481e1-d101-406a-b44f-9a935efe4089"}}
{"id": "0bdb32604a2c97ab", "prompt": "In `httpx/_client.py`, the `send` method has a lot of repeated logic for handling timeouts and redirects. It feels overly coupled with the implementation details of the transport. Can you refactor this to extract the core request dispatching logic into a separate private method `_send_single_request`? I want `send` to be just a coordinator that sets up the state and calls `_send_single_request`. Keep the public API signature exactly the same.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure to preserve the existing docstring and type hints."}, {"prompt": "Check if `_send_single_request` needs to be exposed for testing or if it should remain strictly internal."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0bdb32604a2c97ab", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:c7b418a94476", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f845462-07dd-44e7-936a-cae0255bf2e1"}}
{"id": "624ef648b099c788", "prompt": "Tô vendo algumas mensagens de aviso no `pip install`. O package `certifi` está com uma versão bem nova. Poderia me dizer na documentação do Python ou nos release notes do certifi se houve alguma breaking change na API de acesso aos certificados que possa quebrar o httpx?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Espera, eu vi que o certifi só expõe o caminho do arquivo CA bundle, não a API em si. Então não deve haver problema de breaking change de código, apenas de versão."}, {"prompt": "Entendido. Então basicamente o httpx vai continuar funcionando mesmo com o certifi novo, certo? Só preciso atualizar o certificado se houver problemas de SSL reais?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "624ef648b099c788", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:77a51586271e", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "198db98b-5c4e-4f81-abb7-f582873d7c11"}}
{"id": "6c8d87a369547fc0", "prompt": "run the test suite\n\nI just pulled the latest changes and I'm seeing failures in the async client tests. Specifically `tests/client/test_async_client.py::test_streaming_response`. The error output is:\n\n```python\nFAILED tests/client/test_async_client.py::test_streaming_response - RuntimeError: Event loop is closed\n```\n\nIt looks like the event loop might not be getting clean up properly or is being reused incorrectly. Check `tests/conftest.py` and the async client implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6c8d87a369547fc0", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:e6d49322139b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9e06018-80c0-4aab-b404-71a942f30177"}}
{"id": "f13a819fe3acca99", "prompt": "How does the `httpx.Client` handle connection pooling? I'm looking at `httpx/_client.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f13a819fe3acca99", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:9cc875ef22d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1668af3f-7896-42b8-8fbe-8b394ba492db"}}
{"id": "2ee3c2c922345186", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the httpx/ directory. List them out with file path and line number. Also check if there are any FIXMEs.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the TODOs in httpx/_client.py, add a GitHub issue link reference comment if possible, otherwise just mark them as 'deferred'."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2ee3c2c922345186", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:563cf122fa5f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5bde295-ff0e-481b-bfd9-485065e89382"}}
{"id": "ee263e0fbbd30cc6", "prompt": "Search through the entire `httpx` directory for any `TODO` comments. List them out with their file paths and line numbers so I can prioritize them for the next sprint.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ee263e0fbbd30cc6", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:a5802702c306", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7aa93b1-d316-4dcc-b206-8c1ff49f7af3"}}
{"id": "e3e07ad670851e87", "prompt": "Fix the type hinting error in `httpx/_client.py`.\n\nWhen I run `mypy`, I get this error:\n\n```text\nhttpx/_client.py:452: error: Incompatible return value type (got \"Union[Response, Any]\", expected \"Response\")\n```\n\nLooking at line 452, it seems the `Request` object is being mishandled in the type union. The `Request` class in `httpx/_models.py` doesn't fully satisfy the `RequestLike` type alias used in `_client.py`. Please align the types so `mypy` is happy without using `# type: ignore`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e3e07ad670851e87", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:0344b9a677d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f324db4-30b8-4ed9-8fc6-98d5059c47c9"}}
{"id": "19fa09a41c3570b9", "prompt": "Ouvre une session de terminal interactive ici pour que je puisse debugger les variables d'environnement.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "19fa09a41c3570b9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:510f4afc7723", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bbd86883-aa8f-40b5-b551-e44c3eaa4d71"}}
{"id": "378c3a2fa97ce119", "prompt": "Can you look up the official `aiohttp` migration guide for Python 3.13? I know we're not using aiohttp, but I'm trying to understand if the breaking changes in `asyncio` task groups affect how `httpx` handles async client lifecycles. Specifically, are there any changes in the `httpx._client` async shutdown logic that align with PEP 692 or 707? Just need a high-level summary from the Python docs or httpx changelog.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "378c3a2fa97ce119", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:28206f33e6f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c6988d5e-0e60-4cf8-a71b-f64e2b896ca7"}}
{"id": "d1496fe9d78c21ec", "prompt": "Scan `httpx/_config.py` and `httpx/_types.py` for any instances where user input could end up in an eval() or exec() call. I know we don't use eval directly, but sometimes people use `getattr` or `__import__` in unsafe ways. Also check if we're properly sanitizing headers in `_client.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d1496fe9d78c21ec", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:1aee96b3ebce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd1380f7-726e-4d3b-ac15-c21da60210b9"}}
{"id": "10ff6de18893a3d0", "prompt": "Fix the typo in `httpx/_auth.py`. The docstring for `FunctionAuth` says it provides 'Basic' authentication, but it actually implements custom callable-based auth. It should say 'Custom'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "10ff6de18893a3d0", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:5d6d472c9695", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c107d68c-b8ad-4a05-8306-4aa728de0674"}}
{"id": "eba83fd92205c045", "prompt": "I noticed we're still using an older version of ruff. Can you check `pyproject.toml` and update the dev dependencies to the latest stable version? Also, check if there are any breaking changes in the latest version that might affect our current linting rules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eba83fd92205c045", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:efad80f086af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de62f6eb-aa94-4483-9b10-24a2d0b92523"}}
{"id": "4d779e131f1b116c", "prompt": "I'm reviewing a PR that changes how we handle SSL contexts in `httpx/_transports/default.py`. The author claims it's more secure. Can you review the diff? Specifically, look for any regressions in cipher suite selection or if we're accidentally disabling hostname verification.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4d779e131f1b116c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "httpx:8e17675caf40", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0ca64be2-2e21-4131-a44b-cf5f563eaf42"}}
{"id": "101a9bd29af713d4", "prompt": "Can you walk me through the flow of a request when using `httpx._transports.wsgi.py`? I want to understand how the WSGI app is invoked.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "101a9bd29af713d4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:2f5fc08b6ef8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b8cedd45-ecb2-42bb-8a20-e75ef30b0b89"}}
{"id": "874959f67a18bb3c", "prompt": "Cleanup task: 1) Look through `scripts/` and remove any deprecated or unused helper scripts. 2) Check `tests/common.py` to see if we have any stale fixtures that are no longer used in the main test suites. 3) Ensure `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with the recent version bump details.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "874959f67a18bb3c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:773289b3a757", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5742e8e-b877-45f0-b895-780aa950768e"}}
{"id": "c9cbd7e5b748d253", "prompt": "I need to add a new header validation rule. Can you trace where request headers are processed in _models.py and tell me which file handles the final serialization before sending? I want to make sure I hook into the right place.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does _config.py play a role in this?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the specific line in _models.py where headers are validated."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9cbd7e5b748d253", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:d69fdae5ba6f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "805f19cd-f855-4e03-a38e-945462dcd645"}}
{"id": "b2abca958b564e37", "prompt": "That last commit I pushed to the `test-async` branch (the one that touched `tests/client/test_async_client.py`) actually broke the CI. Revert it immediately.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b2abca958b564e37", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:93fadec38d9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3ad1ad86-b718-4d37-bc52-b77adc693078"}}
{"id": "6ef09279aeb005bf", "prompt": "can you list all the branches in this repo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6ef09279aeb005bf", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:cf537a3b0bee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b6c038c-4e13-4506-a86b-40c7dfcf1578"}}
{"id": "004bddaf1fb6e1d8", "prompt": "Please build the package and publish it to the local dist folder. I need to verify the wheel file includes the typing stubs. Run `scripts/build`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "004bddaf1fb6e1d8", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:dee2d4cbc75b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "302bbb6e-64bb-42ed-be2d-93570c0bb43c"}}
{"id": "aba4976896033b51", "prompt": "We're planning to support a newer version of `chardet`. Check `tests/test_decoders.py` and `tests/test_content.py` to see if our current decoding logic might break with a major version bump of chardet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aba4976896033b51", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:b8c7fdf621ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33ef69f3-b133-45d7-a320-9937f7172d24"}}
{"id": "314c8a1e6fad6906", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of try/except blocks in tests/client/test_redirects.py and httpx/_client.py that catch generic Exception. Please narrow these down to specific httpx exceptions where possible. Start by identifying the broad catches and then update them to be more specific.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "314c8a1e6fad6906", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:6e0cffe4d43d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dac16650-5534-4035-a6cc-5f0cd5db090a"}}
{"id": "587c5e4382bc6422", "prompt": "Ich versuche zu verstehen, wie die URL-Parsing-Logik implementiert ist. Kannst du mir zeigen, wie `httpx/_urlparse.py` mit komplexen URLs umgeht?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "587c5e4382bc6422", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:a66c3ddcea5e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39bede7f-630a-406c-9630-3d4577acaea2"}}
{"id": "4bfb798a4e1000e7", "prompt": "I need a quick status update on the repo state. Show me what changed in the last 24 hours (git log --since='24 hours ago') and also do a count of total lines of code excluding tests and vendored files.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "While you're at it, please run the build script to make sure everything still compiles correctly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4bfb798a4e1000e7", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:c0298eebdc54", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2519c41-858b-4bc1-800a-031bf72bcb67"}}
{"id": "46622714c1f1243d", "prompt": "Does httpx automatically decompress gzip and deflate responses? If so, is there a way to get the raw bytes before decompression for debugging purposes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "46622714c1f1243d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:7a3731123b11", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a8487f9-6686-4f81-8b20-2184e3f68990"}}
{"id": "bbadc7d47f077d27", "prompt": "Refactor the auth logic in httpx/_auth.py and httpx/_client.py. Currently, the auth handling is scattered. Move all auth-related preparation logic into httpx/_auth.py so that _client.py just calls _client.prepare_auth() and _auth handles the rest. Don't change the public API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bbadc7d47f077d27", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:03e52f3b0c74", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e6c52eb-1bce-4f95-8b49-03bce33a1fb1"}}
{"id": "e4bd8b46e29aee29", "prompt": "The `httpx.Client.get` method is raising a `httpx.ReadTimeout` when I set `timeout=1.0` on a local server that usually responds in 200ms. I'm using version 0.28.1. Can you check the `httpx/_client.py` and `httpx/_config.py` files to see how the read timeout is passed to the underlying transport? I suspect there might be a mismatch in how the timeout config is applied during the actual network call.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e4bd8b46e29aee29", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:bb93199d70e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6eba0c7-07e2-436d-b68f-1adcaa1ab7fc"}}
{"id": "e5ec9ceb79fd839d", "prompt": "I'm trying to verify the version consistency across the codebase. Please read the version string from `httpx/__version__.py` and compare it against the `version` field in `pyproject.toml`. If they don't match, tell me what the diff is.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e5ec9ceb79fd839d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:de2a24366d37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6457d0b8-2ba1-4154-a8ad-b57c84d5d0a7"}}
{"id": "cf1396757d8ab491", "prompt": "Check `requirements.txt` and `pyproject.toml` and tell me if they are in sync. I see `httpx[http2]` mentioned in the README but I want to make sure the actual lockfile/requirements don't miss the `h2` package. List every package name found in both files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf1396757d8ab491", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:ee7a1629a2f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c912c95e-93e4-41e6-b828-891a00498fb4"}}
{"id": "32f732746b2e9b38", "prompt": "Can you hit the GitHub status page at https://www.githubstatus.com/api/v2/status.json to see if there are any active incidents? I want to know if there's a major outage affecting GitHub right now, which might be blocking our CI/CD.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check https://www.githubstatus.com/api/v2/summary.json for the last 24 hours of incidents."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "32f732746b2e9b38", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:890ccb881d95", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "edb3234c-a9b3-4754-b9d7-f55d9baaad48"}}
{"id": "b99a845ececca51e", "prompt": "I suspect a recent CVE was published for httpx involving SSRF. Can you check https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=httpx to see if there are any new entries from the last 30 days? If the site is slow or unresponsive, just tell me the status code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b99a845ececca51e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:c6bf9f7ebcc6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8f252e1-21d5-4348-b752-02707aa575d0"}}
{"id": "37564f9e2fb325c4", "prompt": "I need to update the README.md. Add a small section under 'Features' that explicitly mentions support for both WSGI and ASGI applications, even though it's in the text, let's make it a clear bullet point.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "37564f9e2fb325c4", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "httpx:9c0aea5566b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "182f2677-f179-4126-9a32-ce0d8e670895"}}
{"id": "7b94233d417eadb7", "prompt": "Can you audit our dependencies in `requirements.txt` for any known security vulnerabilities? Specifically, pay close attention to the `cryptography` version mentioned in the recent commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7b94233d417eadb7", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "httpx:60934d73965b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47800420-02a7-495e-b2c3-2d901d441bce"}}
{"id": "616e9860db2994ef", "prompt": "Is httpx fully compatible with the requests library API? I have a large codebase using requests and want to know the pain points of switching.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "616e9860db2994ef", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:7e0991d3a9c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2765d20f-a0ce-4b28-98fb-bc3d5b6390de"}}
{"id": "ed262fb3540a22b9", "prompt": "In httpx/_client.py, the public methods like get, post, put, patch, delete have a lot of repeated boilerplate for argument parsing and validation. Please refactor this into a private helper method `_request` or similar that handles the common setup, so the public methods just pass through their arguments. Keep the signature of the public methods compatible for now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ed262fb3540a22b9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:d2d954025108", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adc17d8d-61a0-4fcb-9a76-163af8d27a18"}}
{"id": "3e1ff4bbd6defa66", "prompt": "I noticed the library uses 'anyio' for concurrency. How does this affect my ability to use the client in a standard threaded environment versus an async event loop? Do I need to change my import structure?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is the sync client thread-safe?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any known issues with mixing sync and async clients in the same process?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3e1ff4bbd6defa66", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:f68d4610a9ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "830bcad1-953b-407b-929b-c6757ff6f8a1"}}
{"id": "c1ca8fafcf5f9b76", "prompt": "Qual teste cobre especificamente o redirecionamento com autentização? Preciso entender o comportamento atual antes de refatorar.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Existe algum `pytest.mark.skip` relacionado a isso?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c1ca8fafcf5f9b76", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:8b34a9a2f594", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d134c6ff-5d4e-44be-9610-3b94b28e4b38"}}
{"id": "c5721e6e931657ac", "prompt": "¿Qué cambios se introdujeron entre la versión 0.28.1 y el commit previo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c5721e6e931657ac", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:9368b30b6ce5", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bdad2a3b-6262-4e80-88ad-fb3071cf92ec"}}
{"id": "87e3841a8aefba9d", "prompt": "Como é estruturado o cabeçalho `User-Agent`? Quero ver onde a string é montada e quais módulos contribuem para ela.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "87e3841a8aefba9d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:c48814a4f74a", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80e31948-db2b-4a6a-88ad-ea0f59750005"}}
{"id": "3554a273227b1084", "prompt": "Show me a diff of what changed in the repo today. I want to see the files modified by me and my teammates in the last 24 hours.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Filter that list to only include changes in the `tests/` directory."}, {"prompt": "Summarize the key changes in a bullet-point list for the daily standup notes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3554a273227b1084", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:04a16fade667", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "45b99d42-2c6d-4bc6-8b41-8c4a135e90c2"}}
{"id": "12dc2cb2a1ec6ced", "prompt": "I need a rough metric of how much code is left in this project. Count the lines of code (excluding tests) in the `httpx` package. Ignore `__pycache__` and generated files.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now do the same count for the `tests` directory."}, {"prompt": "Compare the test-to-source ratio against the last release."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "12dc2cb2a1ec6ced", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:60403f1f5ac8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d485685-8890-4598-bf99-2f8c7b8ab161"}}
{"id": "ffb7ad44c928ba84", "prompt": "I'm tired of my editor generating __pycache__ and .pyc files. Check .gitignore and ensure python bytecode artifacts are ignored. If they aren't, add them. Don't change anything else.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ffb7ad44c928ba84", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:46296e7feaa8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a931485f-c11b-4477-bbf3-ec979e41c0b1"}}
{"id": "53674933355a7010", "prompt": "Fetch the current version of httpx published on PyPI at https://pypi.org/pypi/httpx/json and tell me what the 'info.version' key says. I need to verify it matches our local __version__.py before we tag a release.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "53674933355a7010", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:58f8ab055c67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95dc44f0-d264-4a5c-bb38-3b8f956a5957"}}
{"id": "1dd40235b1979c04", "prompt": "Run `scripts/lint` and fix the output. I want a clean slate before I push.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, now run `scripts/test` to make sure the linter fixes didn't break anything."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1dd40235b1979c04", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:9337ae058eb7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "411fea82-d8de-4cce-bb9e-91051c270ba0"}}
{"id": "74712983c6064b54", "prompt": "Clean up the imports in httpx/__init__.py. It's getting messy with all the direct imports. Can you create a structured export mechanism or at least consolidate the imports to improve performance on import? Also, remove any deprecated items that aren't in __all__.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "74712983c6064b54", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:338e23cfc6ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02daf712-e158-4796-a68f-d90624a4c26c"}}
{"id": "375c89d6332af17a", "prompt": "Run the linter on the httpx package and fix any issues it reports. Stick to the existing style guidelines, don't introduce new dependencies.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now check if the tests still pass with those changes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "375c89d6332af17a", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:b2c1b87ed3d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dea2f68e-1b6d-4c5d-add8-974c67de2e11"}}
{"id": "1bedf9250e811c2d", "prompt": "Onde a verificação de SSL é configurada no cliente síncrono? Estou tendo problemas com certificados auto-assinados.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "E no cliente assíncrono é o mesmo arquivo ou diferente?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1bedf9250e811c2d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:5a42834a4a19", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b156aab-54de-4498-b96d-3ddf12345d51"}}
{"id": "bc1b73208d382d5d", "prompt": "In `httpx/_status_codes.py`, please add a new constant for `451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons` named `UNAVAILABLE_FOR_LEGAL_REASONS`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc1b73208d382d5d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:a1ed2258f31c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c6c8fc4-3bfc-4f1b-a892-f88d9173689b"}}
{"id": "7a77622d4f232776", "prompt": "I need to update `httpx/_exceptions.py` to include a new `ProxyError` subclass. Go ahead and implement that.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7a77622d4f232776", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:d6d547f47aae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2297f819-b3c6-4203-959b-1edaf9a04d0e"}}
{"id": "d81d2bc4b48f8540", "prompt": "Je n'arrive pas à comprendre comment `httpx/_auth.py` gère l'authentification de base. Peux-tu ajouter un petit commentaire explicatif dans le fichier sur la méthode principale ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ok, merci. Maintenant, split mes modifications actuelles en deux commits séparés : un pour le commentaire et un pour la correction de typo que j'ai faite dans `README.md`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d81d2bc4b48f8540", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:7af6d4861c14", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "715cbc66-b523-49c1-8cb0-f50c6cd7a5c4"}}
{"id": "4471b5135c7a1a7a", "prompt": "In httpx/_transports/default.py and httpx/_transports/mock.py, the error handling for connection failures is duplicated. Please extract a common base class or utility function for connection retry logic that both transports can use. Start with default.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4471b5135c7a1a7a", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:e989cfd7e244", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3cec5b30-c164-4833-a9ea-3838fca5c48c"}}
{"id": "314e96883e154d9d", "prompt": "Génère un jeton de test aléatoire pour mes tests de sécurité locaux, il me faut un format similaire à ce qu'on pourrait attendre dans une auth header.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "314e96883e154d9d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:74be6b01302e", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0e1a6720-bc5e-4eed-93f2-055724cb4829"}}
{"id": "da8206a3ac2a91f7", "prompt": "Muéstrame el último commit relacionado con el soporte de HTTP/2.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "da8206a3ac2a91f7", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:a78057216e2a", "lang": "es", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d18d5d2-8c4b-453e-b2f5-0666c0713d2b"}}
{"id": "3ac521d21699b4b6", "prompt": "Was macht die Funktion `test_api.py` eigentlich genau? Ich will verstehen, wie die API-Tests strukturiert sind.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ac521d21699b4b6", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:147e0a2c011c", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd5dc42a-562e-4a9e-bfe1-07c982f35135"}}
{"id": "31a1020b947f3db8", "prompt": "I need to verify if the httpx website (https://www.python-httpx.org/) is currently up and serving a 200 OK status. Also, does the /docs/img/butterfly.png image load correctly? Please make the requests and report the status codes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If the site is down, check the official Twitter handle @encodeprojects for any outage announcements."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "31a1020b947f3db8", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:63e1f7b4e805", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0bcd9c1a-abe4-4ce6-9b86-7064025cb518"}}
{"id": "a7a86292db38672c", "prompt": "what changed in the repository between version 0.28.1 and the current state? specifically looking for changes in how timeouts are handled.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a7a86292db38672c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:c2ce1b36af98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c451a57d-0d05-4766-9641-e8ea3ad54074"}}
{"id": "2c613e8f1750dc87", "prompt": "The documentation says httpx supports `ssl_context` argument for client creation, but if I pass a custom `ssl.SSLContext`, it gets ignored for HTTP connections (non-https).\n\n```python\nimport httpx\nimport ssl\n\nctx = ssl.create_default_context()\n# Configure ctx...\n\nclient = httpx.Client(transport=httpx.HTTPTransport(ssl_context=ctx))\n```\n\nBut if I use `httpx.AsyncClient` with `httpx.AsyncHTTPTransport(ssl_context=ctx)`, it throws a TypeError saying `ssl_context` is not supported for non-HTTPS connections or something similar in newer versions.\n\nCan we clarify this behavior? It seems inconsistent between sync and async transports. In 0.28.1, async client failed silently or errored?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2c613e8f1750dc87", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:cc4e724ea343", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f528823-76c9-401f-a80c-95187806fea2"}}
{"id": "ebb469626d3a509c", "prompt": "I'm auditing our dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Can you check if the current version of httpx installed in this repo has any reported CVEs? Also, please check the official status page at status.python-httpx.org to see if there are any active incidents affecting the service.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ebb469626d3a509c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "httpx:458d5401e21b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6d76bd7-f5c2-4324-8b6c-a4a4f6cf5ee5"}}
{"id": "6375b9c685ed5ba2", "prompt": "I need to send a POST request with a multipart file upload. The documentation shows examples with `files`, but I want to ensure I understand the type annotations. Can you show me how to use `httpx.Client` to upload a binary file and also include some standard form data in the same request?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does httpx automatically set the 'Content-Type' header for multipart requests?"}, {"prompt": "How can I stream a very large file without loading it entirely into memory?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6375b9c685ed5ba2", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:835085734672", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef1fbfef-a301-4c28-89e4-daf214a34f8b"}}
{"id": "321b2b4e95ff0268", "prompt": "I'm debugging a weird issue where the timeout isn't being respected on redirects.\n\nCan you find where the timeout config is applied in `httpx/_transports/default.py` and `httpx/_client.py`? Also check if `httpx/_config.py` has any logic that merges default timeouts with per-request timeouts.\n\nShow me the specific lines where the timeout value is actually passed to the transport.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What does the test suite say about this? Run `python -m pytest tests/test_timeouts.py -v`."}, {"prompt": "Actually, also check git blame on `httpx/_client.py` around those timeout assignments to see when that logic was introduced."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "321b2b4e95ff0268", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:9a1947fa85e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70f04971-3933-428e-b934-ce5d45831cf8"}}
{"id": "04f30de7e44bf952", "prompt": "Quick question: looking at `httpx/_models.py`, how is the `Response` object structured? I want to know how it stores the raw content vs the decoded text.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Where is the logic that actually performs the decoding? Is it in `_decoders.py`?"}, {"prompt": "How does it handle character set detection?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "04f30de7e44bf952", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:be98d2c8feeb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08c3cb6b-b534-4b06-8be8-6484dfa39269"}}
{"id": "a83f7630a34ae16e", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how HTTP/2 is handled. Which module initializes the HTTP/2 support, and where does it actually call the underlying library to upgrade the connection?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the import chain for that?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any tests that explicitly test HTTP/2 upgrade scenarios?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a83f7630a34ae16e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:286351ac0666", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1d612bb-e94f-497e-a5c1-6ae9e8c6c87d"}}
{"id": "d0f86ebf403dbc93", "prompt": "Kannst du mir erklären, wie der `Client` in `httpx/_client.py` die Verbindung zu den Transports verwaltet?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0f86ebf403dbc93", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:9c6cb73ca681", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce00efac-125c-4792-bc4f-4c03fe0108d5"}}
{"id": "62584d730827cc89", "prompt": "Hey, my CI pipeline keeps failing on the linter check but it works fine locally. Can you run `scripts/lint` and tell me what's wrong with `httpx/_client.py`? It might be a version mismatch issue with ruff.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "62584d730827cc89", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:550a4ff025fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e8823b35-495c-407e-9126-eef390802a6d"}}
{"id": "5f86ca5e39b4ab38", "prompt": "I need to refactor the proxy support. Can you show me every place in the codebase where the `Proxy` class or proxy configuration is actually used? I want to make sure I don't break anything.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f86ca5e39b4ab38", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:6152f4731a03", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5cab1a1-fd26-4892-b5a4-bd6d1e95d7f2"}}
{"id": "4605d170509677ff", "prompt": "How does httpx handle timeouts? I see it says \"strict timeouts everywhere\" in the readme. Do I need to configure them individually or is there a global default?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4605d170509677ff", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:df5f2233916b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59dbc489-0033-4e76-97db-a286622e4f8f"}}
{"id": "8d3037016aa02998", "prompt": "I'm seeing that the httpx docs mention support for HTTP/2, but I also see an optional dependency flag `[http2]` in the install instructions. Can you explain how HTTP/2 support is implemented in httpx and what triggers a connection to upgrade to HTTP/2? Specifically, is it automatic or do I need to configure the client?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8d3037016aa02998", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:d9e3afcbe338", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a4c405a-40ac-4c45-a60b-247dc4c59af3"}}
{"id": "7241bcd8efdd53d9", "prompt": "What are the main differences between the types defined in `httpx/_types.py` and the actual implementation in `httpx/_models.py`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7241bcd8efdd53d9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:2d8477c500c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "68691411-eaa3-48e5-a591-0486ec016785"}}
{"id": "30f2b15995e6801b", "prompt": "I'm seeing a deprecation warning for `verify=False` in my tests when using the ASGI transport. Is this a known issue in httpx 0.28.x? Can you check the migration guide for 0.27 to 0.28 or the latest changelog to see if SSL verification behavior changed for ASGI/WebSocket clients? I need to know if I should be updating my test fixtures or if this is a bug in the transport layer.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "30f2b15995e6801b", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:15fed1b48ad6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98de1bc0-67ee-4d4c-a3f5-e6dde23a4baf"}}
{"id": "79a1c6bc43b072f9", "prompt": "I need to verify that the recent change to `httpx/_decoders.py` didn't break anything.\n\n```\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"test_decoders.py\", line 45, in test_gzip_decode\n    assert response.text == \"...\"\nAssertionError: Expected bytes but got str\n```\n\nPlease fix the test in `tests/test_decoders.py` to handle the return type correctly according to the new implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "79a1c6bc43b072f9", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:720a42f8c7c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad817e8a-8b36-42b6-94e6-f179dd1ce268"}}
{"id": "ca8cec7c9af5ae71", "prompt": "The error message in `httpx/_exceptions.py` for `ConnectTimeout` is a bit cryptic. Can you update it to be more descriptive, specifically mentioning that the connection attempt timed out?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ca8cec7c9af5ae71", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:58a23c1ef60b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d87df169-7c07-413d-9066-03c76f78c692"}}
{"id": "05bd264203d4eb8b", "prompt": "where is the retry logic implemented? I need to understand how the fallback happens.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "05bd264203d4eb8b", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:bbe7221a438b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64fe1955-3768-4b7e-a069-f4daeee3309d"}}
{"id": "62b8176efe796049", "prompt": "Can I make requests directly to a WSGI application without starting a local server? I want to test my Flask app internally.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "62b8176efe796049", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:a2142bd64762", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f2f74ac-c46b-4e3e-a391-0f8bafa62d8a"}}
{"id": "393c49841b431379", "prompt": "What's the recommended way to handle cookies across subdomains in httpx now? I found an old StackOverflow post mentioning `domain` attributes manually, but the current `httpx.Cookie` docs seem sparse on scope. Can you check the latest rfc6265bis draft or the httpx documentation's 'Cookies' section to see if they recommend using `Set-Cookie` headers directly or if there's a built-in helper for subdomain scoping?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, so manual handling is still the way? That feels risky."}, {"prompt": "Should I open an issue about this or just stick to the manual parsing in `httpx._cookies.py`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "393c49841b431379", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:bb661df5fbe1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92d0e754-6b2c-4dfb-9fb7-825dfad8ef18"}}
{"id": "830777cd26b95f70", "prompt": "Bump the version in httpx/__version__.py to 0.29.0. Update CHANGELOG.md with '0.29.0' under an 'Unreleased' header if it doesn't exist, or just update the latest entry. Also run `scripts/sync-version` if that script exists to ensure consistency.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "830777cd26b95f70", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "httpx:f1cea649c2cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "785a4130-919f-454d-89c5-bd0696676502"}}
{"id": "d0eb3b936dfa26cc", "prompt": "Por favor, leia o arquivo `pyproject.toml` e me diga quais são as dependências opcionais listadas nas seções `optional-dependencies`. Quero ver a lista chaveada por nome (ex: cli, http2, etc) e o número de pacotos em cada grupo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0eb3b936dfa26cc", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:ea7bf2e47846", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef7a6555-2f44-40da-aba5-ee56c85b4934"}}
{"id": "7596b66911dce8e8", "prompt": "The current README doesn't explain the difference between the sync and async APIs very well. Could you add a brief 'Usage' section with two quick code snippets: one for `httpx.Client()` and one for `httpx.AsyncClient()`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7596b66911dce8e8", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "httpx:487cbf394fc2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0be1d37-d7a2-475f-a5f8-2c060d22bdfc"}}
{"id": "fca916084dab638d", "prompt": "I'm getting a TypeError when instantiating HTTPX in async mode. Is there an error message or log output that comes from `httpx/_exceptions.py` related to event loops?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fca916084dab638d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:bfa28612ad61", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea4e0cd2-bb16-4454-9458-a0a63a51d573"}}
{"id": "f04d2d494a3483cc", "prompt": "Add a `timeout` parameter to the `httpx.get` function signature in `httpx/_api.py` to allow overriding the default client timeout.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f04d2d494a3483cc", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "httpx:2c1eae52da94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64a8b7fd-0cbb-49f0-bed5-2c578a6c653b"}}
{"id": "193f0bcec33b51fc", "prompt": "I'm trying to use the CLI with a WSGI app. `scripts/test` passed for WSGI, but when I run `httpx http://127.0.0.1:8000/` it hangs. The issue seems to be in `_transports/wsgi.py`. The request object isn't being properly consumed by the WSGI callable. Can you look at `tests/test_wsgi.py` and see how the test client sets up the environment variables?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "193f0bcec33b51fc", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:b8a1d800e47d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ca8fd2f-3a68-4865-98e5-987fa9eb733c"}}
{"id": "098e752c76529e00", "prompt": "I need to add support for a new query parameter parsing edge case. We need to ensure that repeated keys in the query string like `?foo=1&foo=2` are correctly preserved in the URL object.\n\n1. Look at `httpx/_urls.py` and `httpx/_urlparse.py`.\n2. Modify the `URL` class constructor or the parsing logic to handle list values for repeated keys.\n3. Update the test `tests/models/test_url.py` to assert that `URL('http://example.com?foo=1&foo=2').query_params` returns `[('foo', '1'), ('foo', '2')]`.\n\nDo not change the `__init__.py` exports yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "098e752c76529e00", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:6b57f71518d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f382ceda-34b8-41e2-83cd-43ddd8c81549"}}
{"id": "37c1fdf58a393778", "prompt": "I just realized I messed up the last commit I made to `httpx/_auth.py`. I included an extra import that shouldn't be there. Can you remove that import and amend the previous commit so it's clean?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "37c1fdf58a393778", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:147a25748cae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f71d62f6-d6aa-4a69-a82a-1b1150892b0b"}}
{"id": "fcf42ed1feaf241d", "prompt": "The `httpx.AsyncClient.get()` method seems to hang indefinitely when the network adapter is disconnected while a request is in flight. I'm using the default transport. Shouldn't it raise a `ConnectError` or similar after the timeout?\n\nHere is a minimal reproduction:\n\n```python\nimport httpx\nimport asyncio\n\nasync def test():\n    try:\n        async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=5.0) as client:\n            # Disconnect wifi here, then run this\n            response = await client.get('http://httpbin.org/delay/10')\n    except Exception as e:\n        print(f'Caught: {type(e).__name__}: {e}')\n\nasyncio.run(test())\n```\n\nIt just hangs. I'm on Linux.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fcf42ed1feaf241d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:35c08ad6648a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3a35a93-aa88-4518-9860-6f530ac133a9"}}
{"id": "eebaa7b1bd1498ac", "prompt": "I need to prep for the next release. Can you handle three things: \n1. Audit `httpx/_auth.py` and ensure all new auth types are properly exposed in `httpx/__init__.py`.\n2. Check `httpx/_transports/wsgi.py` and `httpx/_transports/asgi.py` to see if we can tighten up the error handling for connection resets.\n3. Run the existing tests for both transports to make sure we haven't regressed anything in the middleware layer.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eebaa7b1bd1498ac", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:656e5ddd7fa6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af7c61f1-55ad-4bc0-82b1-5ecbc0381179"}}
{"id": "15bafa8d70d04ade", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with URL parsing. Can you explain how `httpx/_urlparse.py` handles scheme detection and if it relies on any external libraries or just standard lib?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "15bafa8d70d04ade", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:1fa77a3f0ee2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "52f924d4-610e-4a3b-b873-a7428cbf3036"}}
{"id": "3b52b60b4f84c78c", "prompt": "show me the commit b5addb6 and summarize what it did", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3b52b60b4f84c78c", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:29f7b2b2a48e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea065f0a-1f23-44a2-90db-59d9f951a27d"}}
{"id": "c1611c1116959e36", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird behavior in `tests/client/test_client.py` when running the async tests. Specifically, `test_async_client.py` is failing with a `RuntimeError: Event loop is closed`. The stack trace points to `httpx/_client.py` inside the `Request` initialization. Can you check if there's a resource leak or a shared event loop issue in the test setup?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c1611c1116959e36", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:07642ea1342c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05850db5-7ff0-4bac-b0f1-06919852fb75"}}
{"id": "b3cc565bae80b2a5", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when trying to make a request to an ASGI app.\n\n```\nhttpx._exceptions.HTTPStatusError: 404 Not Found\n```\n\nCheck `tests/test_asgi.py` and `httpx/_transports/asgi.py` and tell me if I'm passing the scope correctly. The app is expecting a lifespan event but maybe we aren't sending it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b3cc565bae80b2a5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:505bfd2c3637", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5059d97-178c-45f5-b413-92882b0d5e05"}}
{"id": "d5d42f4bbe9fd792", "prompt": "Peux-tu ajouter un test unitaire dans `tests/models/test_url.py` pour vérifier le comportement avec des ports non numériques ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5d42f4bbe9fd792", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:986cea9f7285", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "782a4716-e809-4b8c-b242-f819795e3033"}}
{"id": "ac700077d9e759c5", "prompt": "Parse the `.gitignore` file. I want to know exactly what patterns are being excluded. Specifically, does it ignore `__pycache__/` and `.pyc` files? Also, are there any IDE-specific ignore rules (like `.idea` or `.vscode`) present? Give me a summary of all top-level directory ignores.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ac700077d9e759c5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:22ee3672459e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43da7c68-db00-4526-8e84-38d6bbc1d22c"}}
{"id": "6fca3e9b54a40f25", "prompt": "Il y a un bug dans ma logique de test dans `tests/test_api.py`. Je vais tout effacer et recommencer. Reviens à l'état du commit précédent.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6fca3e9b54a40f25", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:34a6550f9d71", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "46b94a0f-aa65-4ec4-b978-2510b712ee43"}}
{"id": "40fc3ead2454fd68", "prompt": "The way we handle URL objects in httpx/_client.py vs httpx/_urls.py is inconsistent. Sometimes we pass strings, sometimes URL objects. Can you standardize the client methods to accept Union[str, httpx.URL] but normalize them immediately to httpx.URL instances internally? Update httpx/_client.py and httpx/_api.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40fc3ead2454fd68", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:076f7ed2da4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5262c73-0772-48ec-aa84-5e3d9d4d49fc"}}
{"id": "bb665bed9f160d36", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of duplicated code across `httpx/_client.py` and `httpx/_api.py` where we construct `Request` objects and then hit the same underlying transport. Can you create a shared internal function `_create_request` in `_utils.py` that handles the standard URL, headers, content, and params normalization? Then replace the inline request construction logic in both `Client.request` and the module-level `get`/`post` functions with calls to this new helper. Don't change the public API, just clean up the code duplication.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bb665bed9f160d36", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "httpx:3cc1b7a1bdfa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18ac26ce-ac57-4b92-a77b-86126f325d17"}}
{"id": "5924cc550bc8947e", "prompt": "The type checkers are getting noisy. Can you: 1) Scan `httpx/_models.py` and `httpx/_types.py` for any `Any` types that should be more specific. 2) Check `httpx/py.typed` to ensure it's being picked up correctly by mypy. 3) Run the linting scripts and tell me if any new errors pop up in the core modules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5924cc550bc8947e", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:a44577d449d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3e15085f-9ddc-4cd5-86bd-67ce164a8c24"}}
{"id": "04e9150aa3844aa0", "prompt": "Find the code that parses the `?q=value` part of a URL. I need to understand how query parameters are handled in `_urls.py` vs `_models.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "04e9150aa3844aa0", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:e271cc3dc148", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd06f835-acc6-4f23-84d2-164f4e03c198"}}
{"id": "cb7631de82174d5a", "prompt": "Est-ce que tu peux me générer une clé secrète de 32 caractères pour tester l'encodage des cookies en local ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cb7631de82174d5a", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:b2e62913a22f", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74d50db1-e03d-4dbd-835b-6230ae4b6386"}}
{"id": "1f774a4c39ba41d1", "prompt": "Running `pytest tests/test_api.py` fails with:\n\n```python\nFAILED tests/test_api.py::test_request_with_transport - TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'transport'\n```\n\nThis is happening in `httpx/_api.py`. The `request` function definition seems to have lost the `transport` parameter in a recent refactor. Please check the signature of `httpx.request` and ensure it matches the documented API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1f774a4c39ba41d1", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:1b34e7f6ce29", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de32f753-92df-4322-8125-e4e4ad8a1b55"}}
{"id": "defc29135da947da", "prompt": "I'm seeing 'ConnectionError' when using the CLI. Is it possible to disable SSL verification from the command line? I'm working in a local dev environment and don't want to touch code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "defc29135da947da", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:51fd89e0f898", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c85abd9-84f1-4f73-8db5-b690f7174556"}}
{"id": "43b3327a02f90665", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the `httpx.Client` timeout behavior. The docs mention it's strict, but I want to see exactly how `httpx.Timeout` maps to the underlying `httpcore` parameters. Can you check the official httpcore documentation for the `Timeout` class signature and explain what `connect`, `read`, and `pool` timeouts actually control? Link to the specific section if you can find it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43b3327a02f90665", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:15e55d6b777d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "546e3b51-5107-465b-ab1f-5bcd98b1893d"}}
{"id": "81ae3b62fcc71695", "prompt": "Oi, estou tentando configurar o proxy no httpx para usar autenticação básica. A documentação do requests diz que eu uso uma URL com o formato `http://user:pass@proxy:port`. O httpx segue estritamente essa convenção ou existe alguma especificação do WhatWG URL Standard que eles usam que muda isso? Preciso checar se o httpx segue o WhatWG.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81ae3b62fcc71695", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:9993292fe623", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c59d95c-a9c7-46f2-bcff-93025627927e"}}
{"id": "f7f21d070c268e26", "prompt": "Run the full test suite but filter it down to just the async client tests. I suspect there's a race condition in `tests/client/test_async_client.py`. Use `pytest -xvs tests/client/test_async_client.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7f21d070c268e26", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:2f99dbfffc40", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bea17eaa-dc67-42c9-9701-c3c455fb385a"}}
{"id": "7e5ef51ce27d8329", "prompt": "Peux-tu ajouter une vérification dans `tests/test_exceptions.py` pour s'assurer que `httpx.NetworkError` est bien levée lors d'une connexion échouée ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ok, maintenant crée une nouvelle branche `fix/exception-tests`, commit ce changement avec un message clair et conforme aux conventions, et pousse la branche."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7e5ef51ce27d8329", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:f0d6b9a66f0e", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f4d2951f-a344-4e0d-b1e9-8f5e20057305"}}
{"id": "ae494846f28fc6e5", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how the async client is implemented. Can you walk me through the core logic in `tests/client/test_async_client.py`? I want to see how it actually exercises the async lifecycle.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ae494846f28fc6e5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:daccee69c7ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "30f67174-8491-4601-9403-161ba0c18962"}}
{"id": "85426b172d08ee3d", "prompt": "check git blame httpx/_client.py to see who last touched the Client class implementation", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "85426b172d08ee3d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "httpx:272b699688c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08fa1d96-2341-4e08-ac90-e4fd2036cceb"}}
{"id": "815aa9d404f49a9d", "prompt": "Attend que le serveur de test sur le port 8000 soit prêt avant de lancer la suite de tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "815aa9d404f49a9d", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "httpx:ddaabf360942", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b4b0c9e-85dd-4826-bd74-681e59e101c4"}}
{"id": "80438c92a2710fe8", "prompt": "Can you refactor `httpx/_transports/default.py` to use `httpcore`'s native pooling features more effectively? I want to see if we can reduce connection establishment overhead for high-concurrency scenarios.\n\nPlease:\n1. Analyze the current `HTTPTransport` implementation.\n2. Check if there are any blocking calls in the `request` method that could be optimized.\n3. Run the local benchmark script if available (`scripts/benchmark`) first to get a baseline.\n4. Then make the changes and run it again to compare.\n\nNote: Ensure backward compatibility with the existing `BaseTransport` interface in `httpx/_transports/base.py`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If the benchmark shows >5% improvement, update the README to mention the performance optimization."}, {"prompt": "Run the full linter check to make sure no type errors were introduced."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "80438c92a2710fe8", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "httpx:361ba9fe41a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4c32080-f6a1-4227-ba99-006fcd72fc85"}}
{"id": "68a5c42df522132f", "prompt": "I'm seeing some issues with async requests. Can you explain how the async client is implemented in `tests/client/test_async_client.py` versus the actual logic in `httpx/_client.py`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "68a5c42df522132f", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "httpx:b19c65a1ec55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b04e9f6e-41ac-40a2-b2af-9ab4a16a3b49"}}
{"id": "03c4d736ac444b66", "prompt": "I need to add a new timeout option. Where is the default timeout value defined in `_config.py` or `_client.py`? Also, which tests explicitly set timeouts to non-default values?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `test_timeouts.py`"}, {"prompt": "Where is the timeout applied in the actual network call in `_transports/default.py`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03c4d736ac444b66", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:b0621f78406f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11616c71-411c-4161-8522-25a32caccdae"}}
{"id": "280267b3362039e5", "prompt": "The `httpx.URL` object is mutating the original query parameters when I append a new one. \n\n```python\nimport httpx\n\nurl = httpx.URL('https://example.com', params={'a': '1'})\nnew_url = url.copy_with(params={'b': '2'})\n\nprint(url.params) # {'a': '1', 'b': '2'} ?!\nprint(new_url.params) # {'b': '2'}\n```\n\nI expected `url` to remain unchanged. This is happening in `httpx/_urls.py`. The `copy_with` method seems to be doing a shallow merge or modifying the underlying `QueryParams` object in-place.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you fix `copy_with` in `httpx/_urls.py` to ensure deep copying of params?"}, {"prompt": "Please add a regression test in `tests/models/test_url.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "280267b3362039e5", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:7b5fc6ca6c17", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "deb64f6c-fc53-421b-8a63-03158c3d9af3"}}
{"id": "bc7e4ded0adc5448", "prompt": "I need to understand the dependency structure better. Can you parse `pyproject.toml` and list all the optional dependency groups defined under `[project.optional-dependencies]`? I specifically want to know what packages are in the `http2` and `cli` groups.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do any of these optional dependencies conflict with the core requirements?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc7e4ded0adc5448", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "httpx:9033b52f7c1e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cfaa7b6e-afb3-4327-8e08-fe12f1ef9c56"}}
{"id": "ff088b2798c0b85b", "prompt": "I noticed the README mentions both sync and async APIs. Can you show me the basic difference in how I instantiate a client for async vs sync usage?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ff088b2798c0b85b", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "httpx:da4fa07392fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d38c972-4d4c-420e-9cee-bf8f7c6ed175"}}
{"id": "86a16e98ed974a2f", "prompt": "We need to improve our transport layer robustness. Please: 1) Investigate `httpx/_transports/base.py` to see if we can add a more generic way to inject telemetry. 2) Check `httpx/_transports/default.py` to ensure it implements the base interface correctly. 3) Review `tests/test_asgi.py` and `tests/test_wsgi.py` to make sure our transport abstractions aren't breaking the ASGI/WSGI compatibility layer.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "86a16e98ed974a2f", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "httpx:23fac8a49a18", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "266a9567-68a3-4608-a189-390bc02d95c4"}}
{"id": "d3e093db0681bbea", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird issue with `httpx.Client`. When I use `trust_env=False` but also pass a `verify` certificate bundle, the client still seems to be trying to load the system's CA certificates. \n\nHere is the code:\n```python\nimport httpx\n\nclient = httpx.Client(trust_env=False, verify='/path/to/cert.pem')\nresponse = client.get('https://example.com')\n```\n\nIt raises `OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory` trying to load `/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt` (or similar default path) before ever hitting my custom verify path. Is `trust_env=False` supposed to block the default system CA loading? If not, how do I ensure zero system CA dependencies?\"", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks, that makes sense. Can you update the logic in `httpx/_config.py` to respect `trust_env=False` when initializing `SSLTransport` or `config`?"}, {"prompt": "Also, please add a test in `tests/client/test_proxies.py` or similar that asserts `trust_env=False` prevents reading from environment variables for SSL verification."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3e093db0681bbea", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "httpx:795143f4ee4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a220a9b-441e-47fd-94e0-f785a9a3a631"}}
{"id": "e298d89c05319c33", "prompt": "Hey, could you track down definition of the `FunctionAuth` type? I saw it was exposed in `__all__` recently and I need to see its signature.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e298d89c05319c33", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:e56e9036788b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eab16c30-0637-4a50-bc8d-54d7efd89f50"}}
{"id": "de3e6d9346c4e285", "prompt": "I'm seeing an error in my local dev environment: `AttributeError: module 'httpx' has no attribute 'FunctionAuth'`. This is happening after I pulled the latest changes from main. I saw commit `ae1b9f6` mentions exposing it. Can you check the latest PyPI version of httpx (0.28.1) to see if `FunctionAuth` is actually exported in `__init__.py` there? I'm worried my local build is out of sync with the published package or if I'm importing it wrong.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "de3e6d9346c4e285", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "httpx:c10de67f1519", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be94b8dd-15c3-47ba-bb88-be3fe8183102"}}
{"id": "e68f2c7c239b0fcc", "prompt": "where does the 'StreamClosed' error get raised?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e68f2c7c239b0fcc", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "httpx:6c798f52ad4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5cab546-dd87-4de2-88f0-3de5ddb38a1b"}}
{"id": "4b179eee56ce9c34", "prompt": "I need to add a quick docstring to the `Client` class in `httpx/_client.py` explaining its thread-safety guarantees. Can you do that first?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Now create a new branch called 'fix/client-docs', commit this change with a descriptive message, and push it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b179eee56ce9c34", "repo": "httpx", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "httpx:2b6d932e2ff4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "httpx-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5f60d3e7-ee6c-497f-8e64-12471d14a93c"}}
{"id": "4f05c1f565d2d5c3", "prompt": "Hola, estoy intentando entender la arquitectura de OkHttp. ¿Cómo funciona exactamente la reutilización de conexiones y cuándo decide el cliente cerrar un socket? Me interesa saber si es puramente por tiempos de espera o si hay alguna heurística de detección de inactividad.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Hay algún parámetro en OkHttp.Builder para controlar el tamaño del pool de conexiones?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4f05c1f565d2d5c3", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d74edc7873c2", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "731ba36c-7b4c-48cb-acf3-6f217a2aad63"}}
{"id": "506f3e742a6f7e7e", "prompt": "Como implementar autenticação básica com credenciais fornecidas dinamicamente em cada requisição? Sei que existe o `Authenticator`, mas ele parece ser global para o cliente. Se eu precisar trocar o token de autenticação por chamada, ou se as credenciais forem diferentes para diferentes endpoints, como devo estruturar meu código? Devo interceptar antes da chamada ou usar o `Authenticator` de forma inteligente?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Qual a diferença entre usar `OkAuthenticator` e um simples `Interceptor` para adicionar headers de autorização? Tem algum downside performance?"}, {"prompt": "Como o OkHttp lida com redirecionamentos quando as credenciais mudam? Ele resenha a autorização no novo host?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "506f3e742a6f7e7e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:7aabb6275581", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02e24037-c9a9-4815-ae55-b164582c7f82"}}
{"id": "4884148ca45b1716", "prompt": "Achei um erro estranho no `OkHttp.android.kt`. A classe `AndroidPlatform` não está sendo instanciada corretamente. Pode me mostrar a implementação de `AndroidPlatform.kt` e `Android10Platform.kt`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Quem chama esses métodos de platform?"}, {"prompt": "Verifica se `PlatformRegistry` tem os entries corretos."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4884148ca45b1716", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6a36ddf5eb35", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4483714f-d292-43d6-909a-5a902bd5ce40"}}
{"id": "da4c24a4259fda92", "prompt": "Puedes visitar https://www.google.com y tomar una captura de pantalla de la página de resultados de búsqueda para la query 'OkHttp HTTP Client'. Necesito verificar el layout visual actual.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "da4c24a4259fda92", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:cf57e605df75", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7eb8b0ca-6796-41f0-9562-f97492719c6b"}}
{"id": "0eec4addabd7d618", "prompt": "We've had some reports regarding connection stability. Please investigate: 1) The interaction between `RealConnection.kt` and `ConnectInterceptor.kt` during rapid connection pooling cycles. 2) Whether `PublicSuffixList` is correctly handling newer TLDs in the `androidMain` source set. 3) If `DnsOverHttps.kt` is introducing any latency in the common JVM path.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check git blame on `RealConnection.kt` to see if recent changes to connection pooling might be related to the instability reports."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0eec4addabd7d618", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:11e88ceaee6e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a905458-59b8-49cf-aa16-74e97530d34b"}}
{"id": "1734255952024995", "prompt": "Gemäß der Migrationsanleitung von OkHttp 4.x auf 5.x: Muss ich in `okhttp-brotli/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/brotli/BrotliInterceptor.kt` Änderungen an der Interceptor-Schnittstelle vornehmen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1734255952024995", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:014413671be8", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4753fb20-8ad0-4881-8fc6-c0993189f906"}}
{"id": "c424891a65e18ba2", "prompt": "Review the `okhttp-coroutines` integration for potential race conditions. Specifically look at `okhttp-coroutines/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/coroutines` and `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/Exchange.kt`. Does the cancellation logic properly close the underlying socket?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c424891a65e18ba2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6b641c743a12", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ddd42d9b-5f9b-4cd1-b44e-eee037757857"}}
{"id": "f64ac77c0fc97904", "prompt": "Hola. Estoy evaluando migrar de Apache HttpClient a OkHttp. En la carpeta `samples/compare` vi que hay tests comparativos. ¿OkHttp soporta por defecto la lógica de autenticación básica y digest de la misma forma que lo hacía HTTPClient, o tengo que configurar algo específico en el Builder?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f64ac77c0fc97904", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:221ab77d9722", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c3f0ec7-ed79-4ac2-8757-b1d6d80e64c0"}}
{"id": "ff7d4578bc418fe7", "prompt": "Ich habe ein paar Änderungen an den Tests in `okhttp-zstd/src/test/java/okhttp3/zstd/ZstdInterceptorTest.kt` gemacht, aber sie sind noch nicht committet. Kannst du diese Änderungen in logische Teile aufteilen, einen neuen Branch `fix/zstd-tests` erstellen und alles ordentlich committen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ff7d4578bc418fe7", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:9377789dc2a0", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf77a30e-a9bd-4a21-8b3b-2c8e78fc2b17"}}
{"id": "f675c98264f6fa6e", "prompt": "我想看看今天（基于最近10个 commit）有哪些代码变动。请生成一个简短的报告，按文件类型分类统计一下改动行数（增加/删除）。重点看一下 `okhttp/src/jvmMain` 下面的变化。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "具体列出 `PlatformRegistry.kt` 在近期提交了哪些改动？"}, {"prompt": "有没有删除了重要的配置文件？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f675c98264f6fa6e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a02889722299", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "20760206-c93c-4b87-919d-6ceb730af8a7"}}
{"id": "59fed2b182cad796", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/MediaTypeTest.kt` to verify that `MediaType.get(\"text/plain; charset=utf-8\")` parses the charset correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "59fed2b182cad796", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:95339c2ec313", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "25dcd054-6e62-4421-9369-aba3716f70a4"}}
{"id": "82800d9b1ad44dd0", "prompt": "I'm getting a `NoSuchMethodError` when running the native-image tests with GraalVM v22.3. The stack trace is:\n\n```java\njava.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'okio.Buffer okhttp3.internal.ws.WebSocketWriter.nextFrame(okio.Buffer, int)'\n    at okhttp3.internal.ws.RealWebSocket.processResponse(RealWebSocket.kt:245)\n    at okhttp3.internal.ws.RealWebSocket.connect(RealWebSocket.kt:200)\n```\n\nI checked `WebSocketWriter.kt` in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid` and it seems like the method signature might have changed in a recent commit. Can you reconcile the signatures between the common and jvm implementations?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "82800d9b1ad44dd0", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e43346b3245a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e37a9d9d-5561-412b-b017-3138d167134d"}}
{"id": "3ee8d7a727f609fa", "prompt": "Estoy viendo el proyecto y veo muchos módulos. Si solo quiero hacer llamadas GET/POST simples sin usar SSE, WebSockets ni HTTP/2 avanzado, ¿cuál es el módulo mínimo que tengo que incluir en mi build.gradle para no inflar el tiempo de compilación y el tamaño de la APK?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ee8d7a727f609fa", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:7104ea028635", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f227d6ea-908c-4466-b5df-0cc7c98e0019"}}
{"id": "9b0c93d5d27a91ae", "prompt": "How does `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt` implement the DNS query resolution? Is it using a specific interceptor or a custom DNS implementation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9b0c93d5d27a91ae", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:47a9dd1f9fee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43ed3d5c-bdf8-4ef8-ad4a-2d7d53c9c8eb"}}
{"id": "6b05ee3a9820394e", "prompt": "My `MockWebServer` tests are flaky on CI. Sometimes `MockWebServer.takeRequest()` throws `java.util.NoSuchElementException` even though I know the request was sent.\n\nIt seems like there's a race condition where the client sends the request, but `takeRequest()` hasn't captured it yet in the `QueueDispatcher`.\n\nI'm using `MockWebServerRule` from `mockwebserver-junit4`. Can we make the rule wait for connections to settle before proceeding with assertions? Or is there a better way to check if the server received a request without blocking indefinitely?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b05ee3a9820394e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4166f315ac67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "377d1525-b770-42e7-ada2-6d5b7d4455c4"}}
{"id": "2bfa121f703a1cbd", "prompt": "帮我格式化整个项目的代码。我知道项目用了 Spotless，直接跑 `./gradlew spotlessApply` 就行。跑完后检查一下有没有文件被修改，如果有，截图或者列出文件名给我看看。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2bfa121f703a1cbd", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e5cc104f7df4", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "495c57cb-3685-40a9-a320-b41533efcd28"}}
{"id": "b0899afebe448c29", "prompt": "我想把项目的版本号从 4.12.0 改成 4.13.0-SNAPSHOT。请检查 `gradle/libs.versions.toml` 和 `okhttp/build.gradle.kts` 里的版本定义，帮我更新一下。注意不要改错其他依赖的版本号。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b0899afebe448c29", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:af05522f7d77", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0965ccd5-5654-4b64-a457-745bf3dc05f3"}}
{"id": "f5b1f1d3ddc66a5b", "prompt": "Me gustaría entender por qué OkHttp rechaza crear una petición GET con un cuerpo (body). He leído los RFCs mencionados en el README pero no termino de ver la justificación práctica más allá de 'no está permitido'. ¿Afecta esto al rendimiento o es puramente por estándares?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f5b1f1d3ddc66a5b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5d64dd6fcbb3", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c84894fa-0729-4699-a8bf-3b131e099e60"}}
{"id": "5990d355d89d58af", "prompt": "What are the differences between the current HEAD and the commit 1c6129e in the okhttp-dnsoverhttps module?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the specific files that changed in that comparison."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5990d355d89d58af", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6e02ef968883", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f87d8b42-a7cd-493b-b20c-b90d7efee077"}}
{"id": "1fd6aa798a90ae8d", "prompt": "I'm seeing a `NullPointerException` in `HttpLoggingInterceptor` when the response body is null.\n\n```java\njava.lang.NullPointerException\n    at okhttp3.logging.HttpLoggingInterceptor.intercept(HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt:120)\n    at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:142)\n```\n\nLine 120 is `val responseBody = response.body?.source()`. Wait, that shouldn't NPE. Let me check the file again.\n\nActually, the NPE is on `response.header(\"Content-Encoding\")`. But `response` shouldn't be null. Is it possible `response.body()` is being accessed after the call is closed? No, this is synchronous.\n\nCan you look at `HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` and add a null check or defensive coding? I'd rather it log \"No body\" than crash.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1fd6aa798a90ae8d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:8306c0554bb2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fcf3d7b-477b-498c-b0b4-eb2f7004166f"}}
{"id": "6434c0b706d657a2", "prompt": "Where is the TLS certificate pinning logic? Specifically, look for `CertificatePinner` usage and the `CertificatePinnerTest` file to see how it validates pins.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6434c0b706d657a2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5f8fca5c8700", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5692da97-99b2-4fde-939c-b87d9935cd28"}}
{"id": "70937c47bf3500b9", "prompt": "I'm seeing a conflict in `gradle/libs.versions.toml`. There are two different versions of Okio mentioned across the file (one in libs.versions.toml, one in the README updates). Update the version in the catalog to match the most recent commit `dfcfab3` which bumps okio.\n\nCommit message: Update square.okio to v3.18.2 (#9746)", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "70937c47bf3500b9", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:f665fc97be9c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "92a10f6c-0a88-4398-aca6-bd821ac4c7b6"}}
{"id": "92e4f53eb21b6a72", "prompt": "What's the purpose of `InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt` in `okhttp-tls`? When is it actually triggered?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "92e4f53eb21b6a72", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:9b3152160817", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fce1d1d9-8c7c-4ea6-bc1c-2a8b6a2390f8"}}
{"id": "6078c22fe7a94746", "prompt": "I want to improve our test coverage and maintenance. Please: 1) Migrate `mockwebserver-junit4` tests to JUnit 5. 2) Look into `okhttp-dnsoverhttps` and see if we can add more edge cases to `DnsRecordCodecTest.kt`. 3) Refactor `okhttp-sse` to ensure `ServerSentEventReader.kt` is properly handling connection resets.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6078c22fe7a94746", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:9dda63a22614", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9cd5b334-c0f1-4c06-91d1-00a75012ee3c"}}
{"id": "36f81d8e1e78ec78", "prompt": "I've been playing around with `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/Cookie.kt` but I'm not ready to save it yet. Stash my current changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36f81d8e1e78ec78", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:719b40be7e4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "993d2dc1-0407-4ac3-a6eb-d566b7a7c174"}}
{"id": "f6ce181c47c9ddd6", "prompt": "In the README, you mention that OkHttp \"is principled and avoids being overly configurable\" and lists \"Does not allow GET with a body\" as an example limitation. Can you explain the reasoning behind this restriction? Is it purely based on RFC 9110 compliance, or are there performance/stability reasons? Also, how does OkHttp handle transparent GZIP? If the server sends a gip response, does OkHttp decompress it automatically, and is there a way to opt-out of this decompression for debugging purposes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6ce181c47c9ddd6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:71cc1799cefe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a2b05b3-7e8e-4ca1-9f3a-fc0e480076a5"}}
{"id": "fda100ead4307efe", "prompt": "Wie wird in der offiziellen Google-Android-Doku empfohlen, `Android10SocketAdapter` zu konfigurieren, um TLS-Fehler zu vermeiden? Ich sehe in `AndroidPlatform.kt`, dass hier spezifische Logik für Android 10+ eingebaut ist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fda100ead4307efe", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:07c7779ebb40", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a477ed9-18c8-454e-b5e1-4803bd6d7c01"}}
{"id": "e4949341811a2622", "prompt": "Welche Version von `okio` ist die aktuell veröffentlichte und supported? In `fuzzing/fuzzingserver-config.json` und `gradle/libs.versions.toml` sehe ich verschiedene Referenzen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e4949341811a2622", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3eb72db7efce", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "816b3a03-0efa-4f8a-976e-fd753f89cb41"}}
{"id": "5ba27c828865483e", "prompt": "The TLS tests in `okhttp-tls/src/test/java/okhttp3/tls/HeldCertificateTest.kt` are very verbose. There's a lot of boilerplate creating temporary certificates. Can you create a test helper or extension function in `okhttp-testing-support` to simplify this? Then update the test to use it. I want the test file to be significantly shorter.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `FakeTls.kt` in testing support can also be updated to support this new helper."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ba27c828865483e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:8e4dd99cc886", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "407ee8e3-3d99-47bf-9942-08e4e9bf3e9d"}}
{"id": "4b0a721d0016a362", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/CacheControl.kt and what was the commit message?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b0a721d0016a362", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:22ad28f47dad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35e49de3-4434-46c6-8717-34c2a76086de"}}
{"id": "64e1371299be69a5", "prompt": "Briefly explain how `okhttp-sse/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/sse/internal/ServerSentEventReader.kt` handles the incoming stream from the server.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "64e1371299be69a5", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:22104b798db0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d01a202-6b14-4469-8729-66cdf9e27b2c"}}
{"id": "821f426bfa4de0c0", "prompt": "最近提交里看到清理了一些容器测试，请检查 `.gitignore` 文件，看看有没有 `build/`, `out/` 或者 `*.class` 相关的规则已经被忽略了。如果没有，加上去。另外，把 `ide/` 文件夹也加进去。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "821f426bfa4de0c0", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c0aff953f2a0", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc126398-2008-41d7-8191-07c2377c5385"}}
{"id": "d41f978f1a0332ea", "prompt": "Can you run the benchmark for `ResponseBodyJvmTest`? I want to compare the performance of reading a large gzip-compressed response. Make sure to use the `CommonRequestBodyTest` setup to generate the test data consistently.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d41f978f1a0332ea", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c7e34e831571", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec3cd7ec-63bd-49fa-99b4-feabb80740e6"}}
{"id": "7f94afc5fad3bceb", "prompt": "I need to check the OSGi manifest requirements. Open `okhttp-sse/src/main/java9/module-info.java` and `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/*`. Are there any package dependencies we are missing from the module-info.java for the sse module? Specifically check if we need to require okhttp.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, add the requires okhttp. What else is missing?"}, {"prompt": "Just add the requires okhttp. I'll review the PR."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7f94afc5fad3bceb", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:98576fb4b3e9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ede1be7-e001-4b3d-8013-f8278d30f928"}}
{"id": "8a6f7450cc063e88", "prompt": "헤더 설정 관련해서 `HttpMethod.kt` 파일 안에 GET 요청에 바디를 넣는 것이 명시적으로 차단되는 코드가 있어? 사양(RFC 9110) 위반 예외 처리 부분을 찾아줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8a6f7450cc063e88", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ef805aef68ae", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75e3e961-c3c8-4a4b-bb84-9529d88bd276"}}
{"id": "c8338729b197f938", "prompt": "Run the `MockWebServerRuleTest` in `mockwebserver-junit4`. I'm seeing a flake where the server doesn't restart properly between nested tests. Can you look at the `StartStopExtension.kt` implementation and see if there's a race condition?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The issue seems to be related to how we handle the dispatcher queue. Can you check `QueueDispatcher.kt` if we're draining it correctly after each test?"}, {"prompt": "Thanks, that didn't fix it. Let's try adding a timeout to the `Socket` creation in `DelegatingServerSocketFactory.kt` to see if it's hanging forever."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8338729b197f938", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b4a3ff5b7a52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "754e9e66-b0b6-4f4d-9605-a1a988219f9e"}}
{"id": "f2684484b4b57bc4", "prompt": "Please fix a memory leak in `RealConnection.poolCleanup()` or related code. We are seeing our heap usage grow with `okhttp3.internal.connection.RealConnection` instances even after they are closed.\n\nI suspect the issue is in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/RealConnection.kt`. When a connection is marked as no longer valid (e.g., due to `ECONNRESET`), it is removed from the pool, but the underlying socket isn't being closed immediately, leading to file descriptor leaks.\n\nCan you trace the `close()` call? I believe we need to ensure `socket.close()` is called in the `finally` block of `connect()` if `failed` is true.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2684484b4b57bc4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:1b5d1d973a66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "14bbd35f-2266-44e9-bdd3-e31a2d5cd786"}}
{"id": "335fc7925d5c7c73", "prompt": "Check `regression-test/src/androidTest/java/okhttp/regression/LetsEncryptTest.java` and compare it with `android-test/src/androidTest/java/okhttp/android/test/letsencrypt/LetsEncryptClientTest.kt`. Are they testing the same endpoint? If not, what URLs are they hitting?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "335fc7925d5c7c73", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:9ee198313007", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b5f5570-5dea-43a8-b355-333062354474"}}
{"id": "d25dd468e84adb02", "prompt": "Delete the `mockwebserver-deprecated/` directory and all its contents.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d25dd468e84adb02", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0018368c1209", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4505ce8-a786-4544-8b8e-d4a483de0b7b"}}
{"id": "986950c74a5592ba", "prompt": "The existing `okhttp-logging-interceptor/README.md` (if it exists) or the module's documentation is a bit thin. Can you write a guide on how to configure the log level and what each level actually outputs in the logs?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Include examples for BODY and HEADERS levels."}, {"prompt": "Mention how it interacts with the standard OkHttp interceptor chain."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "986950c74a5592ba", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6c6ad790310c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a680b6e7-60d4-4b0c-8475-e48f2b25f0fe"}}
{"id": "a15451a5624cf0ca", "prompt": "Estou tendo problemas com o caching de respostas no OkHttp. Parece que o cache não está sendo respeitado corretamente quando tenho cabeçalhos `Cache-Control: no-store` vindos do servidor, mas às vezes vejo dados antigos. Pode explicar como o `CacheInterceptor` decide se serve da rede ou do cache? Quero entender a prioridade entre as diretivas do servidor e as configurações do cliente (como `CacheRequest` ou `HttpCache`).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a15451a5624cf0ca", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b4b5ad59b59d", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2af510a9-e545-4eaf-932c-133a1ba741bb"}}
{"id": "af8c99a34c6a71c7", "prompt": "The `MockWebServer` in `mockwebserver-junit5` isn't starting up when used inside a JUnit5 `@Nested` test class. Looking at `StartStopExtension.kt`, it seems to be sharing the instance between nested classes incorrectly. Can you fix the lifecycle management so each nested class gets its own server instance?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "af8c99a34c6a71c7", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:64a921797b08", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b6de571-5482-4034-bcdb-cdb50983c14b"}}
{"id": "d8f93d6599ad5593", "prompt": "The `QueueDispatcher` in mockwebserver is leaking requests if a test disconnects abruptly. I'm seeing `OutOfMemoryError: native heap` in our android tests after running a suite of 500+ tests.\n\nHere is the relevant snippet from our test:\n\n```kotlin\n@Test\nfun testLargeResponseLeak() {\n    val server = MockWebServer()\n    server.enqueue(Response.Builder().body(ResponseBody.create(null, \"A\".repeat(1024 * 1024))).build())\n    server.start()\n    \n    val call = client.newCall(Request.Builder().url(server.url(\"/slow\")).build())\n    val response = call.execute()\n    response.close()\n    server.shutdown()\n}\n```\n\nIt seems like the `RecordedRequest` isn't being consumed or cleared properly in `QueueDispatcher` when the downstream client closes the socket without reading the payload. Can you check how `QueueDispatcher` handles queued requests that are never consumed?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add a check in `RecordedRequest` or the dispatcher to ensure memory is released when the connection is closed unexpectedly?"}, {"prompt": "Please verify this doesn't break the existing `MockWebServerRuleTest` cases."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d8f93d6599ad5593", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0ea49790118f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3631c2b9-1d34-408e-bb32-ee353f5120dc"}}
{"id": "68f2d3ebdfb3a2cf", "prompt": "Ich sehe in `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt`, dass DNS-over-HTTPS verwendet wird. Was empfiehlt die OkHttp-Doku bezüglich der Konfiguration von `DoH`-Resolvern für maximale Kompatibilität?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "68f2d3ebdfb3a2cf", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a28b84b6dbe6", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5c83a5f5-176a-43f4-a348-5360c314c028"}}
{"id": "9e2c3ace91435fc2", "prompt": "Scan the `fuzzing/fuzzingserver-config.json` and `okhttp-hpacktests/src/test/resources/hpack-test-case` for any hardcoded secrets or credentials that shouldn't be committed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9e2c3ace91435fc2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "okhttp:cfd97cd249af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bcd3d761-32f9-4b36-a518-ad051dfbc083"}}
{"id": "865537c388f6a673", "prompt": "Look at `gradle/libs.versions.toml`. It's getting crowded. I want to enforce a policy that all dependencies in the `[versions]` block must have a comment explaining why they are pinned (e.g., '# pinned due to Android compatibility' or just '# latest stable'). If a version doesn't have a trailing comment on its line, please add a placeholder comment like '# TODO: justify pinning'. Also, check if there are any duplicate entries in the `[libraries]` block that might be causing confusion, but don't delete them, just list them for me.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "865537c388f6a673", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:436683b2d479", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c53f61b7-55b1-4797-910b-aa5d36b625ff"}}
{"id": "699e3befd2195fc8", "prompt": "Der Compiler wirft einen Fehler in `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/der/AnyValue.kt`. Was bedeutet dieser Fehler genau laut den Kotlin-Normalen-Release-Notes? Ich habe eine Rekursionstiefe erreicht.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "699e3befd2195fc8", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6dae388859d9", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "598eb0c5-1341-4960-89fd-ffffaf6b1572"}}
{"id": "4518c4ca610ca684", "prompt": "请先运行 `./gradlew clean` 清理一下构建产物，然后运行 `./gradlew build` 确保项目能正常编译通过。如果有任何警告，不要静默忽略，告诉我具体是什么。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4518c4ca610ca684", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:8a3a1172e4cc", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "771ee478-b74f-40d3-a667-993c744530f8"}}
{"id": "9fa747bd64c7db85", "prompt": "Veo que han actualizado `org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.osgi` a v3.24.300. Busco la nota de release oficial de Eclipse OSGI para esa versión. ¿Hay alguna lista de cambios incompatibles o breaking changes que deba considerar para los tests OSGI en `okhttp-osgi-tests/src/test/kotlin/okhttp3/osgi/OsgiTest.kt`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Si no hay cambios críticos, procedo a actualizar el build.gradle.kts."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9fa747bd64c7db85", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0b9442a45a72", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a44a9b2-9cb2-4d59-8a2b-b7798ff8e45c"}}
{"id": "d034b0ff298ee3e6", "prompt": "Accede a https://status.github.com/api para obtener el estado actual de los servicios de GitHub. Devuélveme el estado del componente 'DNS' y si hay incidentes abiertos en los últimos 24 horas.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Si hay incidentes, resume los detalles principales."}, {"prompt": "Compara esto con el estado actual del endpoint de API de Okta para ver si hay correlación en caídas."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d034b0ff298ee3e6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:083d40a77777", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7da2e80-635a-4113-9f3d-7df471d78962"}}
{"id": "00bd4e6721b663ef", "prompt": "I'm getting some weird flakiness in the CI for the `mockwebserver` module. \n\nCan you:\n1. Run the tests in `mockwebserver-junit5/src/test/java/mockwebserver3/junit5/NestedStartStopTest.kt` several times to see if it's reproducible.\n2. Check `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/QueueDispatcher.kt` for any potential race conditions in how requests are queued.\n3. Verify if `StartStopExtension.kt` is properly cleaning up resources after each test case to prevent socket leakage.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "00bd4e6721b663ef", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d9ab1edf4e24", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63a437c0-fac3-436a-9257-a69e4045d2b5"}}
{"id": "ccc8082e9cad61db", "prompt": "Show me what changed in the last 24 hours. I need to know which files were modified or added.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ccc8082e9cad61db", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:73b905c325c5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e21c9256-955a-4a17-9109-e9b5de8bde82"}}
{"id": "d46e94af529819f1", "prompt": "I need to revert the changes made by commit `dfcfab3` because it broke the build in the `mockwebserver-junit5` module.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d46e94af529819f1", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3cadcbc6161a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9e4a9d3a-a566-471c-8601-befd92c67f46"}}
{"id": "055c74c71fb6702a", "prompt": "Can you add a new test case to `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/MediaTypeTest.kt` that verifies the behavior when parsing an invalid media type string? After that, please commit the changes with a descriptive message.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, now split this into two commits: one for the test case and one for the documentation update if any."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "055c74c71fb6702a", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:56c20462ed67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "97a1c062-15af-41e8-9269-263d2b6ae4fe"}}
{"id": "9bc7c5664a9dd0ee", "prompt": "The `DnsOverHttps` client is hanging indefinitely when the network is unavailable.\n\nHere is my code:\n```kotlin\nval dns = DnsOverHttps.Builder().client(OkHttpClient())\n    .url(httpsUrl(\"https://dns.google/dns-query\"))\n    .build()\nval client = OkHttpClient.Builder().dns(dns).build()\n\n// This hangs forever instead of throwing an exception or timeout\nval request = Request.Builder().url(\"http://example.com\").build()\nclient.newCall(request).execute()\n```\n\nI have `connectTimeout` and `readTimeout` set, but it seems like the DNS lookup step isn't respecting these. Can you look at `DnsOverHttps` and `LookupDnsCall` to see why the timeout isn't propagating to the DNS resolution phase?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `LookupDnsCall` needs to inherit the client's timeout settings more explicitly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9bc7c5664a9dd0ee", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:1e498144f806", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "975cfbd4-f1d7-4b4b-affa-22f6cb9e0c92"}}
{"id": "a9f94944bbd3f0a3", "prompt": "Triage these findings from Snyk:\n\n1. CVE-2023-XXXX in `okhttp-brotli` dependency (indirect)\n2. Hardcoded API key found in `samples/guide/src/main/java/okhttp3/recipes/kt/DevServer.kt`\n3. Weak TLS configuration in `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/MockWebServer.kt`\n\nPriority 1 and 2? Are they in test/sample code that should be ignored?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9f94944bbd3f0a3", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5b77506abf11", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf2645a4-cc5d-4763-a597-fa8242c0add9"}}
{"id": "3c23c7a59e8b9b38", "prompt": "okhttp-sse/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/sse/EventSources.kt 파일의 EventSource 인터페이스에 timeout 설정을 위한 새로운 파라미터를 추가해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c23c7a59e8b9b38", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:87380e579238", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4368c50-e9e9-4aa0-a5cd-184b39561261"}}
{"id": "f7e4d101278c6d2d", "prompt": "Modernization sprint: 1) Update `okhttp-coroutines` to support the latest coroutine versions. 2) Review `okcurl`'s CLI output to ensure it adheres to the latest user experience guidelines. 3) Check if `okhttp-java-net-cookiejar` can be simplified to reduce its footprint.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7e4d101278c6d2d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e12fa65f8729", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ffce001-da85-4936-9feb-4a9b98e1eb91"}}
{"id": "5c7202ff21386fbb", "prompt": "Alguém tem experiência configurando o OkHttp para usar DNS sobre HTTPS (DoH) em ambientes Android? Estou olhando para o módulo `okhttp-dnsoverhttps` e vejo a classe `DnsOverHttps`. Gostaria de saber: é seguro usar os servidores públicos do Google (8.8.8.8) ou Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) em produção sem preocupações de prividade? E qual é o impacto na latência da primeira conexão?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5c7202ff21386fbb", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a246b2113581", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0ec48a1c-4b97-4f7d-997c-333ded0b7443"}}
{"id": "c4cbea2c51bf8cc2", "prompt": "In `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/MockWebServer.kt` and `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/QueueDispatcher.kt`, the pattern of using `executeService` or submitting tasks to an `Executor` for internal state changes (like `enqueue` or `shutdown`) is becoming inconsistent with how `realconnection` and `exchange` handle concurrency in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/`. \n\nPlease refactor `MockWebServer` to use a dedicated `EventLogger` or `TaskRunner` pattern similar to what's in `okhttp-testing-support/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/concurrent/TaskFaker.kt` so that all internal mutations go through a single-threaded execution context. This will make the mock server's behavior more deterministic and easier to test synchronously.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c4cbea2c51bf8cc2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b65b9f05fda3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ca7a9e7-139a-4c02-8056-82e367acfafd"}}
{"id": "36ca70f216e7ecd3", "prompt": "I'm trying to verify that the new Brotli compressor works with the latest okio version. Can you build the okhttp-brotli module and run its tests? I want to make sure we aren't breaking anything with the compression logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36ca70f216e7ecd3", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:81b63f767019", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84eeab18-1693-4873-90c1-1fc9734d0656"}}
{"id": "4fb264026c502945", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the full test suite for the okhttp module, but it's timing out on CI. Can you optimize the `DispatcherTest.kt` file? It seems to be spawning too many threads. Also, please check if we can parallelize the `commonTest` and `jvmTest` tasks in `okhttp/build.gradle.kts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4fb264026c502945", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:34a4aa407c73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c21249f9-db93-4f8a-8836-14116fbeccb1"}}
{"id": "8183abf3ad9588fd", "prompt": "OkHttpClient에서 연결 재시도 로직이 어디에 구현되어 있는지 찾아줘. 특히 `RetryConnectionTest`가 어떤 케이스를 커버하는지도 확인하고 싶고.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8183abf3ad9588fd", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c1331f5297b5", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca242a48-0c11-4f29-b6b4-0b7ced8a82cf"}}
{"id": "b80849c7a69dff37", "prompt": "I need to update the `okhttp-brotli` module to support a newer version of the brotli library, but I don't want to break existing consumers. \n\n1. Check `okhttp-brotli/build.gradle.kts` to see what version constraints are currently set.\n2. Look at `gradle/libs.versions.toml` to see if there's a new version of brotli available in the catalog.\n3. If a newer version exists in the catalog, propose a change to `okhttp-brotli/build.gradle.kts` that makes it use the catalog version but add a system property or build flag that allows downgrading if necessary.\n\nBe careful with the Kotlin DSL syntax. Show me the diff for `build.gradle.kts` and `libs.versions.toml`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wait, actually, just show me the current `reflect-config.json` files in the `native-image` directories. I think the issue might be GraalVM reflection config, not the brotli version itself. List the paths and the count of entries in each."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b80849c7a69dff37", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:14f4b66fe349", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e314f6a9-983b-4b00-a938-41b9fa519f10"}}
{"id": "981ccc28f4dc7618", "prompt": "I need to bump the version number for the next release. Can you update the version in `gradle/libs.versions.toml` and the `okhttp-bom` module? Let's go with 5.0.0-alpha.15.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also please update the version in the `README.md` if it references a specific build number."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "981ccc28f4dc7618", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:aee816bbeb58", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f504893f-3239-457b-be21-3e697385b654"}}
{"id": "fec2268a55e5818f", "prompt": "Estoy buscando información sobre la vulnerabilidad CVE-2023-34048 relacionada con Okio. ¿Puedes buscar en la base de datos pública de NVD o en GitHub Advisories para confirmarla y darme la gravedad? También revisa la versión actual de Okio en `gradle/libs.versions.toml` para ver si estamos expuestos.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fec2268a55e5818f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:2e0421045144", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "615395c2-8510-4c70-9dbe-d5bb37de9ee9"}}
{"id": "d3e5d91631c5f950", "prompt": "Hey, `okcurl` is crashing with a NullPointerException when I try to pipe a file into it via stdin. \n\n```bash\ncurl -s 'http://example.com' | ./okcurl\n```\n\nStack trace:\n```\njava.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke \"java.io.InputStream.read(byte[])\" because \"input\" is null\n    at okhttp3.curl.MainCommandLineKt.main(MainCommandLine.kt:56)\n```\n\nLooks like it's not handling the case where stdin is piped correctly in `MainCommandLine.kt`. Can you fix it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d3e5d91631c5f950", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:465dc576f894", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f43b9a19-2503-4327-a0a8-608e46b6535b"}}
{"id": "a51c0a210e821c24", "prompt": "I need to verify that the `OkHttpTest.kt` in the android-test module passes on a connected device. Run the instrumentation test `SingleAndroidTest` first to make sure the environment is okay.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a51c0a210e821c24", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ef1d6cce57c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89e3fbb0-d1c6-426f-a6c7-0581b198f6cf"}}
{"id": "115c062e155e2fe3", "prompt": "We need to prepare for the next major release. Please handle the following tasks: 1) Update the `okhttp-zstd` module to use the latest version of the zstd library if available in `libs.versions.toml`. 2) Audit `okhttp-logging-interceptor` and ensure all its internal logging calls are using the preferred pattern. 3) Check `okhttp-tls` for any potential leaks in `InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt` when handling certificate chains.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "115c062e155e2fe3", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d1ce5d7d4091", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26ac9eaa-5088-455a-b422-c61fe6607840"}}
{"id": "2a4ee9a0aec74151", "prompt": "I need a unique dev token for my local testing environment. Can you generate a 32-character hex string and save it to a new file called .dev_token in the root directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2a4ee9a0aec74151", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c5aad3fe5ee1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1203c513-b5b6-423f-8aa3-c89fd40936b3"}}
{"id": "d7347aeae7eb0a01", "prompt": "I need to create a new branch called `feature/zstd-support` and move my current work there. Once that's done, split my uncommitted changes into a clean commit for the ZstdInterceptor implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7347aeae7eb0a01", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:489dd43c82af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33cee979-46a9-4613-88a0-e326312f736f"}}
{"id": "9a0b72790c393247", "prompt": "I need to verify that the DNS over HTTPS implementation doesn't block the main thread. Can you start the `okcurl` tool with the `--debug` flag against a local mock server and show me the logs? I want to see if the DNS resolution is happening asynchronously.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9a0b72790c393247", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:fedf65f4e198", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a90c5d19-4aee-409e-8762-17f8ec84cc8e"}}
{"id": "371d578f1597f876", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit message for the `okhttp-tls` changes. Can you amend the last commit to fix the typo in the description?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "371d578f1597f876", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:fa1d8924b9ba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c116003a-c79a-41b5-a293-262140d8b170"}}
{"id": "a81d1172830bc76e", "prompt": "Create a new branch called `feature/zstd-support` and move my uncommitted changes there. Then, commit them using conventional commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a81d1172830bc76e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e8133949ab50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e507d87d-f9c5-4068-843d-b1c60f9b9fa9"}}
{"id": "c52849007d6bb97b", "prompt": "The `BrotliInterceptor` in `okhttp-brotli/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/brotli/BrotliInterceptor.kt` is rejecting valid responses that have a `Content-Encoding: br` header but no body content (length 0).\n\n```kotlin\nif (contentEncoding == \"br\") {\n  response = response.newBuilder()\n    .body(BrotliResponseBody(response.body()!!)) // crashes if body() is null\n    .build()\n}\n```\n\nPlease fix this so it handles responses where the body might be null or empty gracefully, or only applies the interceptor if a body exists.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, check the `ZstdInterceptor` in `okhttp-zstd` to see if it has the same bug. If so, fix it there too."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c52849007d6bb97b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:badcaaffb2d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5183ea46-d61f-471a-8d49-72710c8c812e"}}
{"id": "e7cc206694579860", "prompt": "Pode me dizer exatamente onde a classe `QueueDispatcher` do mockwebserver define o comportamento quando a fila fica vazia? Procuro no arquivo `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/QueueDispatcher.kt`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e7cc206694579860", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:066b31027891", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7702a216-46cb-4c61-bbe0-0d6dcccbe098"}}
{"id": "ba860779e5a18207", "prompt": "Onde está definido o formato do `ServerSentEvent`? Olha no módulo `okhttp-sse`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ba860779e5a18207", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:14495fef7657", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa9b7da9-f609-4710-9dab-1829e0d741e7"}}
{"id": "028972616d4706d2", "prompt": "I'm trying to test our DNS-over-HTTPS implementation. Can you fetch https://dns.google/resolve?name=example.com&type=A&returnCdnIp=true and parse the JSON response? I need to verify that the CDN IP is being returned correctly using the OkHttp client.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "028972616d4706d2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ed2b038b8217", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c08eeec-a845-4c0c-a6f5-d789abd9e8bc"}}
{"id": "dc0ba934a96a3641", "prompt": "Explain how `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/QueueDispatcher.kt` manages the sequence of responses for queued requests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dc0ba934a96a3641", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5ad2f825bae8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2ed3387-e7e5-4cc3-be41-2541009ede30"}}
{"id": "2c194fb070841410", "prompt": "In `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/ResponseBody.kt`, update the error message in the exception thrown when attempting to consume a closed body to be more descriptive: \"Cannot consume body after it has been closed.\"", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2c194fb070841410", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b0be482f6e17", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3505a651-a222-4f2e-8151-5896a63f33c6"}}
{"id": "0a9c9ce63673300e", "prompt": "I need to understand how Server-Sent Events are parsed. Point me to `ServerSentEventReader` and `EventSources`. Also, where is the `Event` data class defined for tests?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0a9c9ce63673300e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:67fd9ef20dfb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89a68efd-839d-4275-a830-f42c4fa61469"}}
{"id": "d868d1cadadb23f2", "prompt": "The logging interceptor in `okhttp-logging-interceptor/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/logging/HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` is getting huge. Please extract the request body logging logic into its own class and the response body logging into another. Keep the public API of `HttpLoggingInterceptor` exactly the same, just clean up the internal structure so it's easier to read.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d868d1cadadb23f2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:540e3c3da3f0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "27a6406d-cc41-467f-afef-4d9c71da747c"}}
{"id": "8d7173ff4660ca2b", "prompt": "I need to update the public suffix list. Which file generates or manages the internal database for that? Just point me to the right source file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8d7173ff4660ca2b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:59b03a97de66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2d9e9bd-b4bb-4393-a391-933c395c5da1"}}
{"id": "e09e3668b165e351", "prompt": "Estou configurando o OkHttp para Android e estou confuso com as diferenças entre `AndroidPlatform`, `Android10Platform` e `Jdk9Platform`. Como o OkHttp escolhe automaticamente a implementação de TLS e socket correta? Especificamente, preciso me preocupar em configurar o `ConnectionSpec` manualmente para forçar TLS 1.2 em dispositivos antigos, ou isso é feito automaticamente pelo `AndroidPlatform`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e09e3668b165e351", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c8c9da6097f6", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ff5f55b5-e70f-471b-aa4f-acabf21b9a33"}}
{"id": "9d9cfe77dbe8c8ba", "prompt": "I think I broke something in `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/tls/HostnameVerifierTest.kt`. Can you revert the last commit I made? I need to go back to the state before that change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d9cfe77dbe8c8ba", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b93fd9c2acd4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6827f4c5-655c-4d50-b46a-7183bb3d5aab"}}
{"id": "857bf80caf96a685", "prompt": "找到所有 `.kt` 文件里的 TODO 注释，统计一下数量，并按模块分组列出来。特别是 `okhttp` 核心模块和 `mockwebserver` 模块。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "把 `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid` 下的 TODO 单独列出来。"}, {"prompt": "这些 TODO 里有没有标注明细日期的？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "857bf80caf96a685", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3faf0de7b7b8", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "048ec205-f48c-4f3b-b5e0-d03477c41101"}}
{"id": "37f6be0de2f461b4", "prompt": "I need to verify the HTTP/2 push promise handling. Run the `Http2Test.kt` in `okhttp/src/jvmTest`. Specifically, look at how `PushObserver.kt` is implemented. I want to make sure we aren't leaking resources if a push promise is rejected early.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "37f6be0de2f461b4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4b84a6596877", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbe9fc22-1147-4d7e-a82f-7de3eb544cb2"}}
{"id": "dd88e9364ba5a31a", "prompt": "Please run the build and fix any compilation errors or warnings that come up. Also, run the linter and apply the suggested fixes automatically.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dd88e9364ba5a31a", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d6fd2208fb4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3524c4bf-d268-47c2-816a-17698ff626d2"}}
{"id": "853b9c26e3243b39", "prompt": "Generate a changelog entry for the `okhttp-zstd` module. We've just added the `ZstdInterceptor` and the `Zstd` utility class. Note that it's an experimental addition for Zstd compression support.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "853b9c26e3243b39", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "okhttp:59f81ddcc131", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5bfed00-1546-4f17-a070-bff15f93c490"}}
{"id": "1099ba459435655f", "prompt": "can u commit my changes? use a good message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1099ba459435655f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0ebd1b8dc272", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7fade746-9d30-431e-9643-791072a60a12"}}
{"id": "008a99efb936e181", "prompt": "Na pasta `okhttp-tls`, onde ficam os adapters DER para ler certificados? Preciso de um resumo dos arquivos em `okhttp3/tls/internal/der/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "008a99efb936e181", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:1ef1e336dee7", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d3fd498-936a-4f5a-9791-35b11af4c3b8"}}
{"id": "0868e36b8d64a1b6", "prompt": "okhttp-tls/src/test/java/okhttp3/tls/HeldCertificateTest.kt 파일에 새로운 테스트 케이스 하나만 추가해줘. 특정 인증서 체인이 유효하지 않을 때 발생하는 예외를 검증하는 내용이면 좋겠어.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0868e36b8d64a1b6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c44136227700", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3281da42-d99c-461a-a232-1ce219c6839b"}}
{"id": "4c0c74609e6c88e3", "prompt": "Mira la documentación oficial de Okio (v3.18.2, que acaban de actualizar según el commit dfcfab3). ¿Cuál es la firma correcta para crear un `RequestBody` a partir de un archivo en Kotlin? En samples/guide/src/main/java/okhttp3/recipes/RequestBodyCompression.java usan Java, pero busco la forma idiomática en Kotlin dentro de okhttp3.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c0c74609e6c88e3", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0e6ade812ade", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a1e970b-52ce-45c1-9590-b080572b97a7"}}
{"id": "2f39fd1066752ce9", "prompt": "I noticed that `RealConnection.kt` in `commonJvmAndroid` is responsible for both socket connection and protocol negotiation. It's doing too much. Can you split the connection establishment logic out into a separate `ConnectionEstablisher` utility? Don't change the public API of `RealConnection`, just move the mechanics.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now check `CallServerInterceptor.kt` and see if it can be simplified since we moved some validation out."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2f39fd1066752ce9", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:efc9d2abe569", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8257eb81-a1d8-4822-9609-cfaa4fc44b9f"}}
{"id": "d45af4e9ef7da9df", "prompt": "I've been messing around with `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/CacheControl.kt` but it's a mess. Can you look at my current uncommitted changes and split them into two logical commits? One for the new properties and one for the helper methods. Make sure the commit messages follow the project style.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d45af4e9ef7da9df", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:49aab865f0c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d8bb151-6d2e-400e-a754-d6fdb502eb34"}}
{"id": "c2f0c5d0d81bfc25", "prompt": "The `DnsOverHttps` client in `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt` is not respecting the `Dns` interface contract properly when the DNS-over-HTTPS server is unreachable.\n\nWhen `query()` fails, it throws a `RuntimeException` instead of a `UnknownHostException` or a specific DNS exception, which breaks the `Dns` contract expected by `OkHttpClient.Builder.setDns()`.\n\n```java\njava.lang.RuntimeException: No address associated with hostname\n    at okhttp3.dnsoverhttps.DnsOverHttps.query(DnsOverHttps.kt:89)\n```\n\nPlease update `DnsOverHttps.kt` to wrap these errors in a proper `IOException` or `UnknownHostException` so the caller can handle them as DNS failures rather than generic runtime errors.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check `internal/-DnsOverHttpsQuery.kt` to see if the error handling logic there needs adjustment."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c2f0c5d0d81bfc25", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3d312edca228", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0e0f895-29a1-4f6a-8563-13d59c8a1acd"}}
{"id": "b97480a7926dc4bc", "prompt": "The `okcurl` command-line tool is complaining about missing classes when running via GraalVM native-image. Check `reflect-config.json` in `okcurl/src/main/resources/META-INF/native-image/okhttp3/okcurl`. Do we need to add more entries for the logging interceptor classes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b97480a7926dc4bc", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5772d4dc5857", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "baeae8c6-3391-43e2-9dad-f958272b7262"}}
{"id": "240528e26f1a5557", "prompt": "In `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/ConnectInterceptor.kt`, change the error message in the connection failure block to be more descriptive.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "240528e26f1a5557", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:06db238892cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d3d1dff-c7f8-4008-bbe2-4051a73dfdb0"}}
{"id": "36d8d1bf1d393219", "prompt": "okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt 파일의 클래스 이름을 DnsOverHttpsClient로 리네임하고, 이 파일을 참조하는 모든 곳을 업데이트해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "36d8d1bf1d393219", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:dc3cfd5d6d5e", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7037f737-31ca-4415-93cf-6852d8359636"}}
{"id": "6f53067b32614c58", "prompt": "I'm looking at `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/RealConnection.kt`. How does it handle connection reuse or failure during an exchange?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6f53067b32614c58", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:fa044d71a1cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f474901e-e10e-47aa-ac78-84e3c1bce8f4"}}
{"id": "b07be1d0870b725f", "prompt": "show me the commit 4d5440f and explain what was removed", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b07be1d0870b725f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0141ea8d0ec9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9d26831-51bd-477f-b312-14e7d57f6b07"}}
{"id": "1672b193cfb2dd18", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid` directory. I want a list of them with line numbers and file paths so I can prioritize them for the next sprint.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1672b193cfb2dd18", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:1001c326027f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5e7d5da-e3f3-4e6d-a421-6b15170eb25f"}}
{"id": "df6c6d80f8c7229d", "prompt": "Estoy revisando la migración de okhttp-dnsoverhttps. En el README dice que usa DoH, pero no está claro en la API pública de `okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt` qué parámetros son obligatorios para inicializar el cliente. ¿Hay alguna guía oficial o ejemplo de código reciente que muestre la configuración mínima requerida sin errores de compilación?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "¿Y afecta esto a la compatibilidad con Android 10+ según AndroidPlatform.kt?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df6c6d80f8c7229d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:59aec2bed99c", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb1c3f47-5ac1-4fe4-beb6-f26a05efcf34"}}
{"id": "5172f7a09deae3e4", "prompt": "Write a benchmark for `BrotliInterceptor` in `okhttp-brotli`. I suspect the decompression is slower than expected on older Android devices.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5172f7a09deae3e4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:fa798f2b62aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a048d9f1-55a9-4b26-95ff-5e9cee956552"}}
{"id": "dc528c4985029063", "prompt": "mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/MockWebServer.kt 파일은 너무 길어. 이 파일에서 PushPromise 관련 로직만 따로 떼어내서 mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/PushPromise.kt 로 분리해줘. (이미 파일은 존재하지만 내용을 이관하는 작업이야)", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "분리 후에 MockWebServer 클래스에서 PushPromise를 사용하는 부분이 깨지지 않았는지 확인해줘."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc528c4985029063", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:bbbd6e6cf110", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fab09351-da2f-4cfc-aadf-6032e8d338f8"}}
{"id": "4b499eac4a436d27", "prompt": "The CI is failing on the native image tests. Here is the error:\n\n```text\nError: No instances of okhttp3.internal.http2.StreamResetException are allowed in the image heap\n``` \n\nThis is a regression. Can you look at `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/http2/StreamResetException.kt` and the `native-image-tests` configuration to see why the reflect config might be missing or incorrect?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b499eac4a436d27", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:11da0d77dba9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "708b953c-22ef-40cf-8cf1-bf76accabadd"}}
{"id": "f04297a0191fe649", "prompt": "What is the purpose of `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/der/DerReader.kt`? Does it support all DER-encoded structures used in TLS?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f04297a0191fe649", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:af69b640cb73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84387a8b-5439-4d72-97a4-0d0e835d1a03"}}
{"id": "11257f51de00521b", "prompt": "I'm seeing issues with HTTP/2 push promises. Can you point me to the `PushObserver` interface and the `PushPromise` class in the mockwebserver module? I want to see how they're defined.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "11257f51de00521b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d755aa555f96", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0a9d43f-ef7f-49f2-a75b-b9276811f176"}}
{"id": "618061e8e55f9abc", "prompt": "Tengo un servicio legacy que no maneja bien las redirecciones 302 con cambios de método (GET a POST). En la documentación se menciona que OkHttp es fiel a las especificaciones modernas. ¿Puedo configurar el cliente para que no haga redirección automática o para que mantenga el verbo HTTP original? Busco una solución rápida sin escribir un interceptor personalizado desde cero si es posible.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "618061e8e55f9abc", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b4b1895b2f2f", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "25a3dab4-2ef4-4f01-955c-92eaec661318"}}
{"id": "4dde011daa3133e7", "prompt": "Estou avaliando o uso do OkHttp para Server-Sent Events (SSE). Vi o módulo `okhttp-sse` e a classe `EventSources`. Como lidar com reconexões automáticas quando a conexão cai? O `OkHttp` lida com isso internamente para SSE ou eu preciso implementar minha própria lógica de retry no lado do cliente usando a API disponível?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4dde011daa3133e7", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ee80d7297720", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19a61220-8931-4eb6-913c-c83bbdae6d7e"}}
{"id": "5f39fa2edb8dc381", "prompt": "I'm looking at `mockwebserver/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/MockWebServer.kt`. How does the dispatcher mechanism work here when multiple requests come in simultaneously?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5f39fa2edb8dc381", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:36755f673105", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e788bc6-4f39-48b2-b926-e7bc02a79de0"}}
{"id": "6b0fbb8c3d23a420", "prompt": "We're seeing some inconsistency in how we handle platform-specific code. Please perform a sweep of the following:\n- Check `okhttp/src/androidMain` vs `okhttp/src/jvmMain` to ensure `PlatformRegistry.kt` is correctly mapping all required dependencies.\n- Look at `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/platform/` and see if we can consolidate any logic between `AndroidPlatform.kt` and `Jdk9Platform.kt` to reduce duplication.\n- Verify that `okhttp-tls`'s handling of `InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt` matches our current security posture for Android 10+.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b0fbb8c3d23a420", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3c160490c241", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "457106a4-f1f8-4314-a74b-e3b65afa7f75"}}
{"id": "a4000a8637526a4d", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/CacheControlTest.kt` that verifies the behavior of a null header.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a4000a8637526a4d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0ff605e75c86", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea298d95-93a5-438b-b703-9a2550515a03"}}
{"id": "ee86f8f78496bbf4", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `MockWebServer.kt` for managing the request queue?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ee86f8f78496bbf4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3c8b7334a447", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5ae12fd-24ce-4979-a715-510874cebed5"}}
{"id": "4e37ea0fa0ca6d77", "prompt": "In `gradle/libs.versions.toml`, count how many dependencies have the version string ending in '-beta' or '-alpha'. Just give me the number.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4e37ea0fa0ca6d77", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:379def9bb673", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e493cd58-0bcd-4f2f-a21c-d9c9e8a74dbb"}}
{"id": "73d69532e7ba39b9", "prompt": "Show me the commit 40a3b87 and summarize what it did.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "73d69532e7ba39b9", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:173a2749f683", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4444813d-6987-4313-83a9-f6775eed94c7"}}
{"id": "401db5c2d386187b", "prompt": "Look at `build-logic/build.gradle.kts` and `settings.gradle.kts`. I need to ensure we aren't including any snapshot dependencies for release builds. Scan all `build.gradle.kts` files in the root and `okhttp-*/` modules and report any dependency coordinates containing 'SNAPSHOT'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "401db5c2d386187b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:2035ab1b7071", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b48b810d-0327-4c0a-8f3e-31b1be80770d"}}
{"id": "143ce694de780c59", "prompt": "Onde a lógica de retry de conexão está implementada? Quero ver o fluxo que tenta conectar em endereços alternativos.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "143ce694de780c59", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a2e4439bc161", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2a27318-698e-4914-838e-64a1f6ccab6b"}}
{"id": "4b419f94a81b5915", "prompt": "grep for 'PublicSuffixList' in the codebase. I need to know which files implement the platform-specific logic for loading the public suffix database on Android vs JVM.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b419f94a81b5915", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:106c64433e6c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c58d942-3a31-4c2d-aa96-67e07ec051f7"}}
{"id": "c8ea7e3bc23360ac", "prompt": "Rename `OkHttpClient` to `OkHttpClient` in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/CacheControl.kt` and its usages.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if there are any broken references in the `samples/guide` directory after the rename."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8ea7e3bc23360ac", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:dde72c296f59", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93dd8204-b730-4d9a-9887-c9713d05af92"}}
{"id": "a575fcb33d5b7d4d", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of refactoring `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt` and I'm not ready to commit yet. Can you stash my current changes so I can switch to a different branch to fix a priority bug?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I'm done with the bug fix. Please restore my work from the stash and continue where I left off."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a575fcb33d5b7d4d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c639210cac00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39c82439-8c38-4297-a700-8211495b1411"}}
{"id": "c19103e9ae86b9e2", "prompt": "I'm concerned about the `InsecureHandshaker` in `okhttp-testing-support`. If this class is accidentally exported in an AAR, it will allow MITM. Is there any public API in `okhttp-tls` or `okhttp-testing-support` that exposes this, or is it strictly internal/test-only?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check `okhttp/src/androidHostTest/kotlin/okhttp3/android/AndroidDnsRobolectricTest.kt` to see how it handles DNS over HTTPS security."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c19103e9ae86b9e2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "okhttp:79f4aac95bc9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ff05426-d026-4f54-a03b-143a874c9aba"}}
{"id": "719f659f4ff2e195", "prompt": "Explain how `HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` intercepts requests and responses. Does it handle body streaming without consuming it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "719f659f4ff2e195", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3e382ed6d985", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c11eb250-f66a-49a9-9bee-53ad02ca6110"}}
{"id": "6a379ad059b7a3fe", "prompt": "Hola. Necesito verificar la respuesta HTTP real de `https://square.github.io/okhttp/`. ¿Podrías hacer una petición GET y decirme cuál es el código de estado y el contenido del encabezado `Server`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6a379ad059b7a3fe", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e98b3b0a26d6", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "223600ed-e0a8-45cc-8e6f-2369d368ab19"}}
{"id": "6da4b82744f7c53d", "prompt": "Busco la referencia oficial de la API de JUnit 5 para el contexto de extensión que usa `mockwebserver-junit5/src/main/kotlin/mockwebserver3/junit5/internal/StartStopExtension.kt`. Específicamente, ¿cuál es el lifecycle recomendado para asegurar que el servidor se detenga incluso si hay un error en las pruebas `NestedStartStopTest.kt`? ¿La documentación de JUnit recomienda `TestInstanceLifecycle.PER_CLASS`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Entendido, voy a revisar las anotaciones de `@TestInstance`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6da4b82744f7c53d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:53e9dedf709d", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a61ab774-72d1-4ac2-87bd-4f6eb63718b2"}}
{"id": "4385fd084aee5f69", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the upcoming release. Can you handle the following tasks:\n1. Update `okhttp-zstd` to use the latest version of the Zstd library if available in `libs.versions.toml`, and ensure `ZstdInterceptorTest.kt` still passes.\n2. Audit `okhttp-dnsoverhttps` and check if `DnsOverHttps.kt` needs any adjustments to support the newer DNS specs mentioned in the recent RFC updates.\n3. Clean up the `samples/guide` directory by removing any deprecated recipe files that aren't being used in the main documentation.\n\nLet me know when these are drafted.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check if `okhttp-sse` needs a version bump in the same PR?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4385fd084aee5f69", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c82e0359344d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78095ebb-5fb2-4ad9-80d7-d02bc485b1a4"}}
{"id": "499a69fc4b823923", "prompt": "Hola, ¿podrías indicarme qué dice la especificación DNS sobre HTTPS (RFC 8484) respecto a la codificación de las respuestas? Tengo un test en `DnsRecordCodecTest.kt` que falla intermitentemente y quiero asegurarme de que mi implementación en `-DnsOverHttpsQuery.kt` sigue exactamente lo que la especificación exige para los registros NS y A/AAAA.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "499a69fc4b823923", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:f380277882b7", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de211ff5-bd1a-4d04-9fa1-f42b2cc00bba"}}
{"id": "1062949ff0ecba4c", "prompt": "I'm trying to trace where the connection retry logic lives. Can you find the class or files responsible for handling failed plans and retrying connections in the okhttp module?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1062949ff0ecba4c", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e74df2d95b6c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1068546e-aacd-451a-af7c-570d8c7b7b5b"}}
{"id": "9d55ea7cb72757ec", "prompt": "We have too many duplicated configuration files in the various `okhttp-*` modules (like `build.gradle.kts`). Many of them have identical dependency blocks for Okio and JUnit. Can you analyze the root `build-logic` and the main `okhttp/build.gradle.kts` to see if we can centralize these common dependencies in the version catalog or a convention plugin? I want to reduce the noise in `okhttp-brotli/build.gradle.kts` and `okhttp-zstd/build.gradle.kts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d55ea7cb72757ec", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ccfe0796ab33", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7562571b-8b27-4d0d-a81a-0bd29d35a721"}}
{"id": "6cc7fae20dd29310", "prompt": "where is TLS 1.3 actually enabled? I know we support it, but I need to see the code that configures the connection specs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6cc7fae20dd29310", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:39cce33b0d91", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a1885ad-5407-4349-ab9e-4f370477de79"}}
{"id": "48f04d8141ceb12e", "prompt": "The `okcurl` module is failing to build because of some temporary debugging jars I left in the build directory. Please clean the build artifacts for `okcurl` and verify the project builds successfully afterward.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "48f04d8141ceb12e", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5e0717d981ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "73a3d4e6-1bc0-492c-a1b7-28db20225cec"}}
{"id": "1bcac543966f53c7", "prompt": "Can you update the `samples/guide/docs` to include a page on 'Advanced Interceptor Configuration'? It should explain the difference between application interceptors and network interceptors using the `OkHttpClient.Builder`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Provide a code example using `HttpLoggingInterceptor`."}, {"prompt": "Explain which one is better for observing redirects."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1bcac543966f53c7", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "okhttp:469a01c1dc0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bda1bc06-4d27-4b7a-9b1d-f0d01f4583a8"}}
{"id": "3783bdd3bcda7389", "prompt": "grep for 'publicsuffix' across the repo. I want to see which files implement the actual loading logic for the suffix list versus just the data.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "So `PublicSuffixList.jvm.kt` handles JVM and `PublicSuffixList.android.kt` handles Android. Do they share a common interface?"}, {"prompt": "Yes, `PublicSuffixDatabase`. Is that singleton initialized lazily?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3783bdd3bcda7389", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:5b9b3d628d2f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1d3c100-d019-4580-abb4-0dfef9997311"}}
{"id": "5571c6591b01d18a", "prompt": "Check if upgrading okio to a newer version than 3.18.2 (as seen in recent commits) would break any of the tests in okhttp-zstd or okhttp-dnsoverhttps.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests for okhttp-zstd and okhttp-dnsoverhttps to confirm."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5571c6591b01d18a", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c7176eb063df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8738b045-9b1d-4539-8175-8f79d441f15a"}}
{"id": "081724c30b5ce706", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `okhttp-java-net-cookiejar` module. The README mentions it wraps `java.net.CookieManager`, but I need to be 100% sure about which specific methods on `CookieManager` are invoked and if there are any known pitfalls with the default storage policy on Android vs JVM. Can you point me to the official JavaDoc for `java.net.CookieManager` and `java.net.CookieHandler` so I can verify the implementation in `JavaNetCookieJar.kt`? I specifically want to know if it respects the `CookieManager.PERSIST_COOKIE_CASE` property.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "081724c30b5ce706", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:44704cc5636a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37ab742c-d5e0-4645-b34f-f346c3440886"}}
{"id": "7d453bfcae4fe014", "prompt": "Estou buscando a implementação do `CertificatePinner`. Onde está a verificação do hash do certificado? Tem alguma referência em `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/CertificatePinnerTest.kt`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Quais são as dependências diretas da classe main?"}, {"prompt": "Existe alguma configuração de TLS nesse arquivo?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7d453bfcae4fe014", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a592c1259c0c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9aa2a72e-a229-4adf-a79f-ea77d2cdf2b0"}}
{"id": "a215b6ac2f5124d6", "prompt": "Kannst du in `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt` eine kleine Anpassung vornehmen? Füge bitte ein Logging-Statement hinzu, das den DNS-Lookup-Prozess startet, wenn die Methode aufgerufen wird.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Danke! Kannst du das jetzt in einen neuen Branch namens `feature/dns-logging` übertragen und die Änderungen mit einer sinnvollen Commit-Message committen?"}, {"prompt": "Vergiss nicht, die Änderungen mit `git commit --amend` zu korrigieren, falls die Message noch nicht perfekt ist."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a215b6ac2f5124d6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:274ea233a7ab", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "efafa7bb-ed65-4930-be2f-363cc4b41d57"}}
{"id": "2d57094e65f1344b", "prompt": "Can you parse `okcurl/src/main/resources/META-INF/native-image/okhttp3/okcurl/reflect-config.json` and tell me which classes are registered for reflection? I'm trying to debug a native image startup failure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2d57094e65f1344b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "okhttp:95b138a095b8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3fa72fa0-bb3a-4bd2-8b20-cf2a2828331a"}}
{"id": "6a221121bf29b9c9", "prompt": "Can you run the `letsencrypt` test in `android-test`?\n\n```kotlin\n// android-test/src/androidTest/java/okhttp/android/test/letsencrypt/LetsEncryptClientTest.kt\n```\n\nIt's failing on the emulator with a handshake exception. I suspect the trust manager isn't picking up the system certs correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6a221121bf29b9c9", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b44f52816079", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bbc26059-8ca9-4c2d-8c6e-4d3665498b18"}}
{"id": "5ef901ed6e6102f5", "prompt": "Delete the `mockwebserver-deprecated` directory and its contents.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ef901ed6e6102f5", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0f538f093c31", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b875cdb-cfad-4710-b4a8-91d38cf75cc8"}}
{"id": "9456dabd7ed4000b", "prompt": "Please run the SSL handshake tests in `okhttp-tls`. Specifically `HeldCertificateTest`. I suspect we have a regression in how we handle private keys compared to the Jvm tests.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now run the full `okhttp-tls` test suite to be sure."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9456dabd7ed4000b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:641cd36278b6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8c34605f-b198-4434-85f1-3e9fc6442ddf"}}
{"id": "51bcab03d4044721", "prompt": "Hi, could you please run the linter and fix any issues it reports? Also, please apply standard code formatting to the files in the `okhttp` module. Thanks!", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you update the API dump files if any public signatures changed?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "51bcab03d4044721", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6d261c856b7d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3def7dde-bdab-440d-9401-24f9df1865bf"}}
{"id": "3cf4ccaecc3e45e9", "prompt": "I see `okhttp-sse/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/sse/internal/ServerSentEventReader.kt`. How does it handle partial data chunks arriving from the network?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3cf4ccaecc3e45e9", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6bdeba9f8204", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13891bdf-294d-45ae-ac21-2ae702a8b942"}}
{"id": "045f5a1e272da554", "prompt": "Can you draft a new entry for the README explaining how to use the `okhttp-sse` module? I want to include a small code snippet showing how to create an `EventSource` using `EventSources.createFactory`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "045f5a1e272da554", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4cecbd6176a6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc0c9412-b263-4fa0-a0df-b8fd59cd9ec8"}}
{"id": "4aefd76ed3dad2d7", "prompt": "Hey, can you update the `MediaType` constant in `samples/guide/src/main/java/okhttp3/recipes/RequestBodyCompression.java` to use `application/json` instead of whatever is there? Just a quick fix.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That looks right. Now please commit this change to a new branch called `fix/media-type-recipe` with a descriptive commit message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4aefd76ed3dad2d7", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "okhttp:81a62b0f1b28", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9733032e-4b6d-45ea-9480-ccd9022caf48"}}
{"id": "3aeeb039737dac06", "prompt": "okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/ResponseBody.kt 에 있는 특정 에러 메시지를 좀 더 명확하게 수정하고 싶어. 'invalid body'라고 되어 있는 부분을 'response body is empty or malformed'로 바꿔줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3aeeb039737dac06", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:ad7d7cd86548", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7aab5b7b-4a23-4228-bb8d-61edc3d77a69"}}
{"id": "05176937e10659a8", "prompt": "I need a mechanical rewrite across the `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/` directory. \n\nCurrently, several files like `-HostnamesCommon.kt`, `-NormalizeJvm.kt`, and `-UtilCommon.kt` contain duplicate logic for string normalization and validation that differs slightly between `jvmMain` and `androidMain`. \n\nPlease extract the common validation logic (specifically for IDN and ASCII normalization) into a shared `commonTest` utility in `okhttp/src/commonTest/` and update the `internal/-HostnamesCommon.kt` implementations to delegate to this shared logic where possible. Ensure `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/WebPlatformUrlTest.kt` still passes after this change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "05176937e10659a8", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:80bb221e973a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "16655fa7-ddbb-4ddd-8859-a640b3c2bd11"}}
{"id": "4a52eb470bc1ed41", "prompt": "I noticed some stale .class files in the build directories after the last refactor. Can you clean the build artifacts across all modules? Just run the standard clean task.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4a52eb470bc1ed41", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "okhttp:041cc04c2735", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "271688f8-ad8a-47a7-b78a-7ad06d8bacb0"}}
{"id": "27b27fb913706c1f", "prompt": "okhttp-zstd/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/zstd/Zstd.kt 파일이 새로 만들어졌는데, 이 파일이 프로젝트의 표준 코딩 컨벤션을 따르는지 확인하고 필요하면 spotless 규칙에 맞춰서 포맷팅해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "27b27fb913706c1f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b6609c7728ff", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aff4056c-bb20-405a-aae0-b95f3f356f7f"}}
{"id": "30562eba52c91fbd", "prompt": "Hi, could you help me find where the HTTP/2 error codes are defined? I'm debugging a stream reset issue and need to see the enum values.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "30562eba52c91fbd", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4bf2bae27322", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e55dbac-979b-43fb-ac36-148e6a857d44"}}
{"id": "f31788825e1e442f", "prompt": "I'm trying to use `OkHttp` with GraalVM native-image but the reflection config is missing entries for `okhttp3.internal.http2.Http2Reader`.\n\nI have `okhttp/src/jvmMain/resources/META-INF/native-image/okhttp/okhttp/reflect-config.json` but it seems the `Http2Reader` class is loaded dynamically in some edge cases involving custom protocols.\n\nSpecifically, the error is:\n`ClassNotFoundException: okhttp3.internal.http2.Http2Reader`\n\nCan you check if we need to add this to the reflect config or if we need to force static initialization of this class in the main entry point `MainCommandLine.kt`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f31788825e1e442f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4ad1f26e7319", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5fa5549e-29f3-4a33-9fdd-52d2423c3140"}}
{"id": "37a44d01b699293d", "prompt": "Help me fix a build failure in `okhttp-tls`. After updating to the latest Kotlin version via `gradle/libs.versions.toml`, I'm getting this error during compilation:\n\n```\nerror: cannot find symbol\n  location: class InsecureAndroidTrustManager\n...\nNote: /path/to/okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt uses or overrides a deprecated API.\n```\n\nThe issue is specifically in `InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt`. It looks like `java.security.cert.CertificateException` is being handled but the method signature changed in newer Android SDKs. Can you update the trust manager to be compatible with Android 12+ without breaking older releases?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "37a44d01b699293d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4068b50f2cc9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8510380a-ca96-4c93-a35e-643f5c4a336f"}}
{"id": "40af6fac736aa14c", "prompt": "Por que o OkHttp foi projetado para não permitir que requisições GET tenham um corpo? Entendo que o RFC 7231 sugere que isso não deve ser feito, mas em casos de uso legados ou específicos, isso às vezes é necessário. Existe alguma configuração ou interceptador que contorne isso, ou é uma decisão de princípio para garantir conformidade estrita com as especificações HTTP modernas?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40af6fac736aa14c", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c8d54bf0b206", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fcee3fa2-5a22-4ae4-a7a9-a0416a2f15f9"}}
{"id": "829306a7deb0247a", "prompt": "I'm getting a crash in `LoggingInterceptor` when the response body is null on a HEAD request.\n\nStack trace:\n```\njava.lang.NullPointerException: body cannot be null\n    at okhttp3.logging.HttpLoggingInterceptor.logResponse(HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt:142)\n    at okhttp3.logging.HttpLoggingInterceptor.intercept(HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt:120)\n```\n\nI'm using OkHttp 4.x. According to the specs, HEAD requests shouldn't have a body. Can you update `HttpLoggingInterceptor` in `okhttp-logging-interceptor` to handle null bodies gracefully?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "829306a7deb0247a", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4a377e039ffc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "19eec5b1-a1c3-4382-bae9-78ffcecb20a2"}}
{"id": "31c292d7b421bfa4", "prompt": "Where is the retry logic implemented for connection failures? I need to know where it decides to attempt alternate IP addresses.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "31c292d7b421bfa4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:3d31c064ce0b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c7bff910-a6da-431b-b4af-13c18edf368f"}}
{"id": "c3a92d470fec753f", "prompt": "Search for all usages of `RealConnection`. I'm doing a cleanup and need to know what calls `close()` on these objects.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, `Exchange` and `RealCall` seem to be the main owners. What about the `FailedPlan` class? Why is it there?"}, {"prompt": "Understood. Can you check if `FailedPlan` is actually used in the current JVM implementation or if it's dead code?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c3a92d470fec753f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:39db4fdf8f13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e34590c-df3a-423f-8e2f-50c665679f12"}}
{"id": "27f78779a43e5117", "prompt": "Check https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/ and summarize the current #1 vulnerability listed there. I need to know if it specifically mentions client-side request smuggling or if OkHttp has any known issues related to it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27f78779a43e5117", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d8fe0214e039", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c4028f0-3156-4980-a865-e63492687669"}}
{"id": "8412ce6b0780a8d4", "prompt": "Start the `okcurl` application in the background so I can test a curl command against my local API. Use `gradlew :okcurl:run`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8412ce6b0780a8d4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:a6ea0604904a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "376c4056-cb9d-48f9-b854-fa81f2f938fd"}}
{"id": "d378f3311ad4cb2f", "prompt": "The build is failing with a compilation error in `okhttp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/okhttp3/DispatcherTest.kt`. Can you check the error output and fix the issue? It seems like a type mismatch in the new mock setup.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Which specific line is causing the compilation failure?"}, {"prompt": "Okay, please run the full test suite for the `okhttp` module to ensure the fix doesn't break anything else."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d378f3311ad4cb2f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4339426327e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fb7a885b-eb85-4b69-81ed-770a5f03c061"}}
{"id": "4231138bb80f4ae4", "prompt": "Wie funktioniert die Konfiguration von `PublicSuffixDatabase` laut den offiziellen OkHttp-Dokumentationen? Ich will sichergehen, dass ich die Liste korrekt aktualisiere.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4231138bb80f4ae4", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:64c3c9398ab3", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f4e13c93-14f4-43da-9c33-76edea6dc587"}}
{"id": "98e598fa785aec6b", "prompt": "¿Dónde puedo encontrar la documentación oficial sobre las capacidades de TLS 1.3 en Conscrypt? Estoy mirando `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt` y necesito entender si el `InsecureAndroidTrustManager` soporta las nuevas extensiones de TLS 1.3 o si debemos migrar a otra implementación según las guías recientes de Google.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "98e598fa785aec6b", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:7118adfd49c6", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93ebad97-a5b0-42bd-8767-9c23568ca306"}}
{"id": "770c6d55ae77334d", "prompt": "Add a `timeoutMillis` parameter to the `RecordingOkAuthenticator` constructor in `okhttp-testing-support/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/RecordingOkAuthenticator.kt`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "770c6d55ae77334d", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "okhttp:bd3c21c48232", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78b4d630-ec0a-4fb6-8e54-855e5de72082"}}
{"id": "fb791fc863186b75", "prompt": "¿Cuál es la diferencia real entre usar `okhttp-java-net-cookiejar` y la implementación estándar de Java para las cookies? ¿Vale la pena añadir esta dependencia adicional en un proyecto Android moderno?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb791fc863186b75", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "okhttp:66a713960b0e", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08199295-2cc9-4f22-a736-ae83ea4984b9"}}
{"id": "3fabd9b5a340d6f6", "prompt": "Walk me through the implementation of `EventSources.kt` in the `okhttp-sse` module. How does it transform a response into an event stream?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3fabd9b5a340d6f6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:e963b7f51910", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f9e3965-b6fa-4171-9d48-1c4ed86ee55c"}}
{"id": "84d5f9b833c86334", "prompt": "The `HttpLoggingInterceptor` in `okhttp-logging-interceptor` seems to be truncating very long headers when `Level.BODY` is used. I'm seeing `... (truncated)` in the logs for responses over 10KB, but the docs say it should log the full body unless explicitly configured otherwise. Can you check `HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` and fix the truncation logic so it logs the full content by default?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "84d5f9b833c86334", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:4cebc437a40b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db308c84-3b2c-4a8c-b7f3-2cf19807bbfb"}}
{"id": "7a1048ab13cb4da1", "prompt": "Run the static analysis linter on the `okhttp-logging-interceptor` module. I want to make sure there are no new Kotlin style violations before I merge this PR.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ignore the warnings for now, but do they fail the build?"}, {"prompt": "Okay, please apply the suggested auto-fixes to `HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` in that module."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a1048ab13cb4da1", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:c1d053b4727d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e7bf1416-c995-4bd4-abcf-118f77d40e95"}}
{"id": "6bf9305880547a88", "prompt": "Check if `RealConnection` in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/RealConnection.kt` correctly handles the new TLS 1.3 handshake failure cases. Look for any missing fallback logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6bf9305880547a88", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "okhttp:566951cfa7af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "973e4810-7af2-4404-93ce-c6e1b729fc22"}}
{"id": "3c5f27b494dea438", "prompt": "I ran a static analysis scan on the `okhttp-tls` module and got a few warnings. Can you look at `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/InsecureAndroidTrustManager.kt`? It seems to implement an unsafe trust manager. Is this intended for debugging only, or is there a risk of it being shipped in a release build?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check `okhttp-tls/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/tls/internal/der/DerReader.kt` for any potential buffer overflow issues or unsafe deserialization patterns."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c5f27b494dea438", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "okhttp:2c5c8c30da2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18575eec-1980-43a3-b292-ac133731056e"}}
{"id": "f4723c46f0d2caec", "prompt": "How does the `DnsOverHttps` class handle query lookups in `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the internal implementation of `_DnsOverHttpsQuery` used during those lookups."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f4723c46f0d2caec", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:be172083c5f1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42f4e48a-f87f-4d92-b540-f6577926a695"}}
{"id": "154cf5619b99aaa0", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing a weird deprecation warning in `okhttp-logging-interceptor/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/logging/HttpLoggingInterceptor.kt` regarding the `Level` enum usage. I know we're on Kotlin, but I want to make sure we're using the recommended level for production logging in the latest OkHttp docs. Can you find the official OkHttp guide section on logging and tell me what level I should be using for 'body and headers'? Also, is `Level.BODY` still the correct enum value or has it changed in recent versions?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "154cf5619b99aaa0", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "okhttp:1ebe8dc30480", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31acd993-ba39-430b-9b19-adab94f254c2"}}
{"id": "374863135b435fe6", "prompt": "List all git branches in this repository.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "374863135b435fe6", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:0cebc076015e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8233b16-d371-4551-b767-d2868d879298"}}
{"id": "3673c8808c0492a0", "prompt": "Check git blame on okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/RealConnection.kt around line 50.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3673c8808c0492a0", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "okhttp:6ede08695867", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74f9f839-5feb-402f-9ed0-b210dd3e45fc"}}
{"id": "df25b9be75257f1f", "prompt": "Please write a technical summary for the release notes regarding the recent changes in `okhttp-tls`. Specifically, mention the new support for DER reading/writing in the `okhttp3.tls.internal.der` package.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "df25b9be75257f1f", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "okhttp:f0c1ab3fa350", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8095201c-9add-42fc-a55a-e54a1e7819f9"}}
{"id": "01e6f684a855d0cd", "prompt": "I'm looking at `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/DnsOverHttps.kt`. Can you walk me through the DNS query lifecycle here?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "01e6f684a855d0cd", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:d71c0c4b3620", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e397668b-17a3-4137-9d45-736234d6393c"}}
{"id": "d05ae2febeb1651c", "prompt": "Update all the sample recipes in `samples/guide/src/main/java/okhttp3/recipes/` to use Kotlin coroutines instead of synchronous blocking calls where appropriate. Specifically look at `PostMultipart.kt` and `CacheResponse.kt`. The goal is to show developers the modern way to use OkHttp with Kotlin. Keep the Java versions in `samples/compare` untouched for now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d05ae2febeb1651c", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:b95a3747c450", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e338932b-f543-4c78-890b-aef64a65871c"}}
{"id": "2dc2f5e051d7b955", "prompt": "Consulta la API pública de Twitter (https://api.twitter.com/1.1/statuses/home_timeline.json) o cualquier endpoint abierto similar para verificar si está disponible. Si devuelve error 429 o 401, ignóralo, pero si está en 200, dame el formato de la respuesta JSON. Además, revisa si `okhttp-dnsoverhttps` podría ayudar a mejorar la privacidad para este tipo de llamadas.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2dc2f5e051d7b955", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "okhttp:730bd2bc7ea8", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "16c52b0f-712b-4ab9-a3cc-70627356033e"}}
{"id": "a8329b8ff20e7564", "prompt": "find where the User-Agent header is set by default.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a8329b8ff20e7564", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "okhttp:317041eea031", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5d76486-0803-4bc1-af39-1e69b3bd59c6"}}
{"id": "36cde49558749fa2", "prompt": "I need to standardize how we handle DNS resolution across the codebase. Currently, `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/dns/LookupDnsCall.kt` and `okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/dnsoverhttps/internal/-DnsOverHttpsQuery.kt` have different internal structures for managing the DNS query state machine. Can you refactor the `StateMachineDnsCall` logic in the core library to be a shared interface that both the standard platform DNS and the DoH implementation can use? I want to eliminate the code duplication in `okhttp-dnsoverhttps`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "36cde49558749fa2", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "okhttp:830403c19933", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5fd49bed-9ba4-4fa2-ab44-c73aa0f4825d"}}
{"id": "c25626322a4a9fa5", "prompt": "Fix the logic in `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/http2/PushObserver.kt`.\n\nCurrently, the `onPushResponseHeaders` callback receives a `PushPromise` but we are not validating that the stream ID matches the associated stream. The documentation says \"Implementations must check that the push promise is for a valid stream.\" We are currently just storing it and ignoring validation, which leads to crashes in downstream consumers.\n\nUpdate `PushObserver.kt` to enforce that the `pushStreamId` is valid relative to the calling stream ID according to HTTP/2 spec rules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c25626322a4a9fa5", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "okhttp:8c5a20dc0c55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "52629efd-0664-4ec1-bf90-591237fe4568"}}
{"id": "f1c5fecb24e8be05", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/connection/RealConnection.kt`? I want to understand how it manages the connection lifecycle.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f1c5fecb24e8be05", "repo": "okhttp", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "okhttp:888c744c722b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "okhttp-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1755c99-163b-4fe8-ae83-079c20e0e699"}}
{"id": "8b6b8c74139d9d23", "prompt": "Peux-tu scanner toute la base de code pour trouver les commentaires `TODO` ? Fais-moi un rapport de ce qu'il reste à faire, fichier par fichier.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b6b8c74139d9d23", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:66206212ba67", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59ccfcae-9535-442e-9e67-dcaf1a6d69fc"}}
{"id": "75d808d2b99f535f", "prompt": "Check `src/requests/_types.py` and tell me what the core type definitions for Request and Response are. I need to know what types are expected for the `headers` attribute.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "75d808d2b99f535f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:abfddd885daa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "483b7770-abfa-471c-af6c-fb9615613cda"}}
{"id": "d76a5e4598200143", "prompt": "I need to prepare for the upcoming major version bump. Please perform the following tasks:\n1. Audit `src/requests/_types.py` and `src/requests/models.py` to ensure all new type hints are consistent with our current PEP 561 compliance.\n2. Check `src/requests/sessions.py` for any deprecated usage of internal utility functions.\n3. Update the test suite in `tests/test_requests.py` to cover the edge cases identified in the recent connectivity issues.\n\nLet me know when each part is ready for review.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d76a5e4598200143", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:5ec269767c78", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee799ff5-ba04-45c8-a2cf-367b426b10a1"}}
{"id": "b7c06c9a9b402f10", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between `requests.Timeout` and the `timeout` parameter in `requests.get()`. Can you explain how it works under the hood? Specifically, does it handle connect timeouts and read timeouts separately?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b7c06c9a9b402f10", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:bb131ac7dcca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d0c1ec0e-f369-4d55-8f4a-d9e855da44b8"}}
{"id": "b4eece006ca5536a", "prompt": "Oops, I just realized I committed the wrong file in my last commit. Amend the last commit to remove the changes in `tests/test_utils.py` but keep the updates to `src/requests/utils.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b4eece006ca5536a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:3947c507c65c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9bc3674-4ae8-4167-a11a-d54c3d18447d"}}
{"id": "3ff13240f27bb72d", "prompt": "빌드 폴더랑 dist랑 cache 관련 파일들 .gitignore에 안 담겨있는 것 같은데 확인하고 추가해줘. 그리고 지금 untracked 파일有哪些?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ff13240f27bb72d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:31586e597cf7", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "874b7aa4-8e04-46e9-8e06-3886cc56ea89"}}
{"id": "f2a038d1b5504039", "prompt": "Wo wird in den Tests eigentlich geprüft, ob das automatische Decoding der Antwortkörper funktioniert? Such mal `test_responses` oder so.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Und gibt es da auch Tests für UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1?"}, {"prompt": "Kannst du mir die genaue Zeilennummer in `test_requests.py` zeigen?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2a038d1b5504039", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:8d9da2b80b6d", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc0352ba-f339-430a-9540-cbe0069b24e1"}}
{"id": "5d73dd8bcb199e95", "prompt": "Wo genau wird die HTTP Basic Auth Header-Zeile gebastelt? Ich vermute in `auth.py`, aber ich will sicher sein, dass das nicht irgendwo tief in `models.py` passiert. Zeig mir die Funktion.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Und wird `urllib3` da direkt angesprochen oder über unsere eigene Logik?"}, {"prompt": "Check mal, ob das für POST-Requests genauso funktioniert."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5d73dd8bcb199e95", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:891fd1d904d0", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c95a44bb-6516-4509-8d6c-4341dccf0dee"}}
{"id": "b41fc16c59a10192", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit. I accidentally included some debug prints in `src/requests/api.py`. Can you amend the last commit to remove those lines?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b41fc16c59a10192", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:f459e377c987", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33867a07-914a-41a4-8431-42d2fad345ff"}}
{"id": "b53ffa6c9d193e99", "prompt": "We got a warning from our SAST tool about `src/requests/adapters.py`. It flagged the `SSLContext` handling as potentially susceptible to MITM attacks if verification is disabled. Can you review the logic in `Adapter.build_ssl_context` and `verify_ssl`? I need to understand if a user can accidentally bypass verification without explicitly setting `verify=False`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b53ffa6c9d193e99", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:a6bc1aee5fa7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f010a666-0923-4ad7-818d-cdb7b27682d2"}}
{"id": "2122fa0867adab2d", "prompt": "Hey, looking at the `sessions.py` file, how does the Session object handle persistent cookies across multiple requests? I want to make sure I'm not missing any details about cookie persistence.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2122fa0867adab2d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:cd235036be0d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "24692023-cd57-4e2e-b890-d105d0c5af10"}}
{"id": "ac52098cf1722c0d", "prompt": "I'm trying to upload a large file using `multipart/form-data` and I'm hitting a memory spike. \n\nIt looks like `requests.models.RequestEncodingMixin._encode_files` reads the entire file into memory if the file-like object has a `read` method but no explicit size. Can you split this up to use chunked reading if the size is unknown? I'm seeing this in `requests/utils.py` around line 200.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ac52098cf1722c0d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:9a5f01258ea9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6aab5850-1121-4061-88b0-965f27529197"}}
{"id": "b41bdf3ae661b01b", "prompt": "We're seeing some inconsistencies in how we handle file wrappers. Can you investigate `src/requests/utils.py` and `src/requests/api.py` to see if we're properly detecting file-like objects? I want to make sure we dont break the fix implemented in 6f205ff.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find discrepancies, please propose a change to `_encode_files` in `utils.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b41bdf3ae661b01b", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:7807bdc678fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "538c9c22-f157-463f-bac5-7dd88c0fa625"}}
{"id": "884a90324d443cfd", "prompt": "Add a new section to README.md under 'Supported Features' detailing the recent improvements to static typing and the addition of type annotations for `Request.hooks`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "884a90324d443cfd", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "requests:5d86389e6255", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c15d630d-ed05-41ac-9431-6fdc31fbd560"}}
{"id": "3154211846c59b3f", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when trying to use file wrappers in `_encode_files`. It looks like it's not detecting them correctly when they use `__getattr__`. Can you look at `src/requests/_internal_utils.py` and see if we can fix the detection logic?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That fix looks solid. Stash my current changes, pull the latest from main, and then apply this fix on a new branch called `fix/file-wrapper-detection`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3154211846c59b3f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:174ef45d1f39", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d46a7e95-8d3a-4bf9-b951-2e8fdd2ce80e"}}
{"id": "841c1ae8a4fad9ab", "prompt": "Where is the logic that decompresses gzip/deflate bodies? I see `Response.content` returns bytes, but I want to know if the decompression happens lazily or eagerly when I access `.text` vs `.content`. Check `models.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "841c1ae8a4fad9ab", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:19b30832fc4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "795e0fc1-f83d-4f1c-87ce-9dd4d07ba03d"}}
{"id": "911fce9fc514784c", "prompt": "Bonjour, peux-tu vérifier les artefacts de construction dans le répertoire racine et les sous-répertoires builds/ ou dist/ s'ils existent, et les supprimer proprement ? J'ai besoin de faire un build propre.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Est-ce que le build passe proprement maintenant après le nettoyage ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "911fce9fc514784c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:7c2d73be2af9", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89ae0300-8a83-41bd-9ea9-059fef8d0f64"}}
{"id": "1ab189d2710acd90", "prompt": "I need to verify that the `auth` module supports the latest OAuth 2.0 bearer token standards. Can you run `python -m pytest tests/ -v --tb=short` and filter for any tests related to authentication? I want to make sure we haven't regressed any existing auth behavior.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1ab189d2710acd90", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:9e22063fcff5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b3d1c1b-4583-449f-88b9-917058d3c8ed"}}
{"id": "6dccdf1b1ecbb7e3", "prompt": "We have a lot of manual string manipulation for URL encoding in `utils.py` (e.g., `urlencode`, `quote`). This feels error-prone and hard to test. Can you rewrite `utils.py` to delegate these specific responsibilities to the standard library `urllib.parse` where possible, instead of our custom `quote()` or `urlencode()` wrappers? Keep the wrappers for now but mark them as legacy or simple pass-throughs if they are just wrappers, and update the call sites in `models.py` and `adapters.py` to use `urllib.parse` directly if there's no behavioral difference.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6dccdf1b1ecbb7e3", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:31619863bf54", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5dffb2a9-2a62-4aeb-8310-2b4339477e67"}}
{"id": "6237454dd6901cd0", "prompt": "What does the pyOpenSSL documentation say about its deprecation from the requests library core? I'm seeing an error `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyOpenSSL'` when running `requests.get()` on my server. Is it still required?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6237454dd6901cd0", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:10282514dfc6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ceb11235-7ec9-43c9-b11c-cb5ef070a54c"}}
{"id": "944f40aa8f6d20d0", "prompt": "In src/requests/adapters.py, I want to add support for a new timeout configuration option called `socket_options` that passes through to urllib3. Can you add the parameter to the `Adapter` class `send` method signature, update the internal docstring, and pass it to the underlying `urlopen` call? Make sure the type hint in src/requests/_types.py is also updated if needed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "944f40aa8f6d20d0", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:ea95a6864069", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74065e51-b218-4441-8d33-573a276a463e"}}
{"id": "bc320526f291a17d", "prompt": "I noticed in `src/requests/sessions.py` that `Session.send` accepts a `stream` argument. However, the type hints in `src/requests/_types.py` or `py.typed` stubs are inconsistent. \n\nSpecifically, `PreparedRequest` is being passed around, but the `hooks` parameter in some methods is typed as `List` instead of `Sequence`. \n\nCould you standardize the typing in `src/requests/sessions.py` and `src/requests/api.py` to use `Sequence` for callables/hooks where appropriate, and ensure the return types match `Response`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc320526f291a17d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:a4c746e80c5e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f64e286a-c1d1-485a-9dbb-f578a216b74e"}}
{"id": "70be98ad8bd9b125", "prompt": "The documentation mentions 'Automatic honoring of .netrc'. How does this work under the hood for authentication? Is it tied to the Session object or the global requests module?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "70be98ad8bd9b125", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:686860bb4e3c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11d60626-3d2c-4cab-9c69-eac0568c918b"}}
{"id": "0cda9a38a5fb65b5", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the `certs` module in requests. The README mentions \"Browser-style TLS/SSL Verification\" but I need to know exactly which certificate bundle is being used and how it's sourced. Can you look up how `requests` handles its default CA bundle? Specifically, I want to know if it uses `certifi` by default and how to override it if needed.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, so if I want to use my own custom CA bundle for testing, what's the cleanest way to do that without monkey-patching?"}, {"prompt": "Got it. Now, does the `requests` library itself download the `certifi` package or do I have to install it separately?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0cda9a38a5fb65b5", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:e27a6e7d4f0b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d08bc220-3d74-4370-865d-a3d90b08abfe"}}
{"id": "c21005865e30d174", "prompt": "Hit https://api.github.com/repos/psf/requests and check the latest release tag. I need to verify if the version in src/requests/__version__.py matches the latest release on GitHub. If there's a discrepancy, let me know the current GitHub version vs our local version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c21005865e30d174", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:11f2fd94f23e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c18f4ec2-1533-4dee-b8ca-1afe85996a3b"}}
{"id": "7846b3fbf027096c", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between `requests.get()` and using a `Session` object directly. When exactly should I use a Session for performance gains? I keep seeing examples where people just use the module-level functions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7846b3fbf027096c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:383c66c4fe87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0e2654c6-f129-48cc-bf8e-30ccf0588ab9"}}
{"id": "dbf7774ab99b07c4", "prompt": "Run git blame on src/requests/models.py around line 50 so I can see who defined the base properties.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dbf7774ab99b07c4", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:d53cbc0d6573", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0bb800c-dde0-4393-a725-f316924974f7"}}
{"id": "1127c214c6a2d982", "prompt": "Check the current status of https://httpbin.org/status/500. I need to know if the server is actually returning a 500 or if it's down entirely. Also, check if https://httpbin.org/json is serving valid JSON right now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1127c214c6a2d982", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:0d66471cfce6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6554d5a4-ca36-460d-a96a-7d7f91792d1c"}}
{"id": "515aa19ff8cc323f", "prompt": "I need to implement a feature where `requests.Session` automatically retries on 502 Bad Gateway errors. Please implement a simple retry logic in `src/requests/adapters.py` that hooks into the `send` method. It should retry up to 3 times with a 1-second delay between retries.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "515aa19ff8cc323f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:21915987fc19", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0aaf811d-47af-4673-b7ee-dfdbde0b5a7c"}}
{"id": "f1e832c51f649a0d", "prompt": "Help me rename `session_factory` in src/requests/sessions.py to `_default_session_factory` to avoid confusion with public APIs. This is used internally in the __init__ and only accessed internally. Please update all references within sessions.py and adapters.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f1e832c51f649a0d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:840a7573d49f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e97ac601-e22c-443d-b306-6d558d9707f4"}}
{"id": "e133da1efef325cc", "prompt": "我发现 `src/requests/sessions.py` 的文档字符串写错了，把里面提到的 'session parameter' 改成 'Session object parameter'。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e133da1efef325cc", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:6b8f535428af", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "160c1ef7-2d78-49eb-813d-4ece7b58ad92"}}
{"id": "612368e906931818", "prompt": "Explain the difference between `verify=True`, `verify=False`, and `verify='/path/to/cert'`. I want to be secure but I'm getting SSL verification errors in my internal dev environment. What's the safest way to handle this?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Why is verify=False considered a bad practice in the documentation?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "612368e906931818", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:f530651558fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a07aae06-a284-47df-baf0-ccecd62e9bd2"}}
{"id": "069834449593d135", "prompt": "I'm setting up the dev environment and I see we use `requests-toolbelt`. I need to know what the recommended way to stream large uploads is according to their current documentation. I saw an old example using `MultipartEncoder` but I'm not sure if we should be using `StreamingPreparedRequest` instead now. Can you check the latest `requests-toolbelt` docs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "069834449593d135", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:5339484d1930", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f18def8d-0e32-46a3-aa22-0e002aff5c15"}}
{"id": "401cb2a642dbd6e7", "prompt": "I need a random 32-character hex token to use as a dummy API key for my local testing environment. Can you generate one for me?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "401cb2a642dbd6e7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:7a15da519bd1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56a45575-20b4-47e5-9db5-ba6e91c8583f"}}
{"id": "cad8886b0689404d", "prompt": "Run a quick audit of our dependency tree. I want to make sure we don't have any sub-dependencies with known security vulnerabilities. Focus on anything related to transport or SSL.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cad8886b0689404d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:01c40fae94c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98269369-7b0c-4a7f-9a36-4883674cab68"}}
{"id": "701737ce1b05a4eb", "prompt": "Revert the last commit (611c616). It seems like that bump to the actions group was premature.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "701737ce1b05a4eb", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:bf5005c81e52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54ed0812-7763-4ca2-9c4b-f66967a6a2f5"}}
{"id": "d1777ea41aa45301", "prompt": "Which file handles the parsing of the .netrc config? I'm seeing issues where it's not picking up my credentials correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d1777ea41aa45301", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:08372b0fd5e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3441abde-b81f-4285-8631-0ec7a4ef4eac"}}
{"id": "c55ac377fd33eca1", "prompt": "The type checking is getting a bit noisy. Please look at `src/requests/packages.py` and `src/requests/models.py` and see if we can suppress the remaining Pyright warnings without losing type safety, similar to what was done in commit 661970d.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c55ac377fd33eca1", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:748a5536ba8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e55b296-6361-4202-a9fb-2859f7e17fac"}}
{"id": "d5fab68b66a3d314", "prompt": "We need to clean up some technical debt across the core library before the next release. Please handle the following:\n1. Review `src/requests/sessions.py` and find any places where we aren't explicitly using type annotations for session-related methods, then add them using the types defined in `src/requests/_types.py`.\n2. Check `src/requests/utils.py` for any deprecated internal utility patterns and refactor them to use the modern standards we established in `src/requests/_internal_utils.py`.\n3. Update `tests/test_utils.py` to ensure all new utility refactors are covered by unit tests.\n\nLet me know when these are drafted.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5fab68b66a3d314", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:5eab52cdd35a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4beddab-cec8-4ae1-9979-8eabef6ff7ac"}}
{"id": "6283439b4d0c55bc", "prompt": "Wait until the local test server is fully responsive on port 8080 before running the next command.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6283439b4d0c55bc", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:29890a8cbbba", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54c752d1-2020-4cad-9253-f03edfd64208"}}
{"id": "b3778c49709777ca", "prompt": "We need to improve our type coverage for the public API. \n\n1. Audit `src/requests/api.py` and ensure all exported functions (get, post, etc.) have complete type annotations.\n2. Audit `src/requests/auth.py` to ensure the auth base classes and implementations are correctly typed.\n3. Once done, run the type checker and report any significant regressions in `src/requests/_types.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b3778c49709777ca", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:74970a5ace04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b136de7b-4da9-488c-a580-e3b970aed0f6"}}
{"id": "5593759bf60132f8", "prompt": "Check the status page at https://status.ietf.org/ or search for the IETF HTTP working group's current status. Also, verify if https://httpstat.us/200 is still up and returning correct status codes for all codes 200-599. I'm setting up a test server and need reliable dummy endpoints.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5593759bf60132f8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:8b4bd0aeeae9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b966011b-633c-4426-95c0-7823891bb223"}}
{"id": "8a01ee85af47d30c", "prompt": "Triage these findings from the latest SonarQube scan:\n\n1. **Medium**: `src/requests/utils.py` - `def parse_header_links`: Potential ReDoS vulnerability in regex.\n2. **Low**: `src/requests/models.py` - `RequestEncodingMixin` - Unescaped user input in URL construction.\n\nPlease analyze the regex in `parse_header_links`. Is it actually vulnerable, or is the input constrained enough by the time it gets there? Also, check how URLs are constructed in `models.py` to see if an attacker can inject unexpected characters.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, for the ReDoS, if it's a false positive, let's add an ignore comment with a justification. If real, fix it."}, {"prompt": "For the URL injection, ensure we're using `urllib.parse.quote` correctly everywhere."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8a01ee85af47d30c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:62b3b8c9d274", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5973a3cd-57b7-4010-8cdc-54e82579005f"}}
{"id": "d778df4a71e1a321", "prompt": "I'm getting a TypeError in `src/requests/utils.py` when passing a file-like object that only implements `__getattr__` instead of the full interface. Can you patch the detection logic in `_encode_files` to handle this? Run `pytest tests/test_utils.py::TestContentEncoding` to verify the fix.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d778df4a71e1a321", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:f74f5cb7d98f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ab2f492-5a7b-4b44-895d-88a2769a8fd1"}}
{"id": "792fb040b76ed14b", "prompt": "Quick fix: in `src/requests/exceptions.py`, add `import logging` at the top. After that, I want to commit it directly to my current branch.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now commit that change with a concise message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "792fb040b76ed14b", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:3f05bf11b082", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc81e1c0-6e51-4b33-be96-1d3bfb5efbb6"}}
{"id": "203c16de2abceead", "prompt": "Look up the 'Session' object documentation on ReadTheDocs. I want to understand if `Session.get()` automatically merges headers from the session instance with the request-specific headers, or if it overrides them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "203c16de2abceead", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:ee5810ea23e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b89de564-90bb-4b56-86ec-1604c4d30ff4"}}
{"id": "03d5f25e317fcff2", "prompt": "The `RequestsCookieJar.update()` method doesn't seem to respect the `domain` and `path` attributes when merging cookies from a `http.cookiejar.CookieJar`.\n\nHere is a test case that fails:\n\n```python\nimport requests\nfrom http.cookiejar import Cookie\n\njar = requests.cookies.RequestsCookieJar()\ncookie = Cookie(0, 'test', 'value', None, False, 'example.com', False, True, '/', False, False, None, None, {}, None)\ncookie.setNonStandardAttr('path', '/api')\njar.update([cookie])\n\nprint(jar['test']) # Returns 'value'\nprint(jar.domain_for_request(None)) # This crashes or returns wrong domain\n```\n\nIt looks like `RequestsCookieJar` is just copying the cookie name and value but losing the metadata. Can you fix `src/requests/cookies.py`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03d5f25e317fcff2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:b54633f3b0e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b170f89-13c4-489b-b136-ae2e2d7b749f"}}
{"id": "97b017f5ef2f0958", "prompt": "who changed the imports in src/requests/sessions.py recently? check git blame to see if it was part of the recent typing updates", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "97b017f5ef2f0958", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:5f950b449dad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5961e9d6-6e91-42a0-9086-604c001d9669"}}
{"id": "114e16a42460b57a", "prompt": "Go to https://www.python.org/ and take a screenshot or describe the current version banner. I need to confirm they've updated the download page for Python 3.10+ support as mentioned in the README. Also check if the PSF logo link in the footer is still valid.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "114e16a42460b57a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:8d2fc9b7d0ec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6804b4a7-2d21-479a-a052-e4b0cb96f350"}}
{"id": "85dca3f3d1d2b93d", "prompt": "The `auth.py` module implements Basic and Digest auth. The pattern for extracting credentials and adding headers is very similar to how the `requests.cookies` module handles the `Authorization` header injection.\n\nRefactor the header injection logic. Create a small utility function in `utils.py` called `_add_auth_header` that accepts a scheme, credentials, and the request, and returns the modified headers. Use this in both `BasicAuth` and `DigestAuth` classes. Ensure we don't break the edge case where multiple auth headers might be present (though we usually only expect one).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "85dca3f3d1d2b93d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:1fdf48140385", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8ed90813-8102-4ed8-99bb-fa1ebaebc70d"}}
{"id": "6f8169660675bbd2", "prompt": "Write a set of release notes for version 2.32.0. Include the ruff pre-commit bumps, the fixes for `_encode_files` detection, and the improvements to static typing for 3rd party imports.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f8169660675bbd2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "requests:997f6e18b0e5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a205a41c-b28e-4ee4-94b2-a9d61fbcdad0"}}
{"id": "1d0602afef0b014f", "prompt": "Start the local test server in the background. I need to write some integration tests that rely on the specific SSL certificate configurations in `tests/certs/valid/`. Run `pytest tests/test_testserver.py -k test_start_stop` first to make sure the test server infrastructure is working.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now, start the test server with custom SSL certs enabled. I need to test mutual TLS authentication."}, {"prompt": "Run `tests/test_requests.py` with the new SSL context and verify that the cert verification logic in `src/requests/api.py` respects the `verify` flag."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1d0602afef0b014f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:1ac52e65a527", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "82a42b51-d517-4685-a05e-15669de487fb"}}
{"id": "029ee6b12571b286", "prompt": "코드를 포맷팅하고 린터를 실행해서 오류가 있으면 고쳐줘. ruff 설정이 있는 것 같은데 그거 써서.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "029ee6b12571b286", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:adaa4e9286f7", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "91b4093e-7d1b-4b3f-88ad-3f1dceb16f44"}}
{"id": "00bdebae9f154dcc", "prompt": "What's the logic behind `src/requests/utils.py` when it comes to handling different types of encoding for response text? I see some logic for `r.encoding` in the README examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "00bdebae9f154dcc", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:6f34047b22ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ff34525-d24e-4749-833f-2d4f7c92c223"}}
{"id": "2f693cf31e6d3a10", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `src/requests/sessions.py` regarding how cookies are persisted between requests?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2f693cf31e6d3a10", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:ec54fe546884", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1345c7fb-bd33-41fb-a74e-b1d9f5276126"}}
{"id": "f7fee19eaa7a2820", "prompt": "Quick question: look at `src/requests/auth.py`. How are the different authentication classes supposed to interface with the prepared request? I'm trying to see if I can implement a custom auth handler.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7fee19eaa7a2820", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:633d1a482582", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cd408158-6fd6-4118-bdd5-eb7267756642"}}
{"id": "3480b68f0b32b425", "prompt": "Prepare a cleanup of the legacy test structures. We need to:\n1. Audit `tests/testserver/` and see if `tests/testserver/server.py` can be simplified.\n2. Check if `tests/compat.py` is still necessary given our 3.10+ support requirement.\n3. Ensure `tests/conftest.py` is correctly sharing fixtures between `test_requests.py` and `test_utils.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3480b68f0b32b425", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:f1355b1dde00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a4eae3e-a6f8-4130-b663-f07b0e1568c4"}}
{"id": "1036d5e4a01e082f", "prompt": "在 `src/requests/__init__.py` 中导出 `RequestException`，这样用户可以直接通过 `requests.RequestException` 访问。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1036d5e4a01e082f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:07df52e938d9", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a9d41a8c-dcf2-4c4d-a960-41c5278bfbe5"}}
{"id": "f9320c0607dddac6", "prompt": "Can you check the current docstrings in `src/requests/sessions.py`? They seem a bit sparse compared to the new type annotations we've been adding. Suggest improvements for the `Session` class methods.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f9320c0607dddac6", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "requests:27aeb1af0be2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "320c806d-dda0-42cd-bdb5-f68e7eee28db"}}
{"id": "99b1fa7386de2985", "prompt": "Remove the deprecated `verify` boolean handling in `src/requests/sessions.py`. It's annoying to pass `verify='/path/to/cert'` and get a deprecation warning even though it's a string. Wait, no, the deprecation is for passing a boolean that isn't True/False. \n\nActually, I want to simplify the logic. Please refactor `src/requests/sessions.py` to remove the `if isinstance(verify, bool)` block entirely and assume `verify` is always a string path or a special boolean value, cleaning up the docstring in `request()` too.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "99b1fa7386de2985", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:7cfaf8a5c0af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9791ff7f-7a7c-43da-b537-63de65a1824a"}}
{"id": "0f1ff0506b37cd2d", "prompt": "I've made several changes across `src/requests/sessions.py` and `src/requests/api.py`. Check my current status and split these into two logical commits: one for session handling and one for the API surface. Write proper commit messages for both.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0f1ff0506b37cd2d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:4640435697ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4065d0fc-ab4d-4fc7-8457-87e4b24c2247"}}
{"id": "9c2eb5e1fab5b1eb", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/requests/sessions.py` and `src/requests/api.py`. There's a lot of repetitive boilerplate in how we construct requests and handle the `params` vs `data` vs `json` arguments. In `requests.get`, `requests.post`, etc., we manually instantiate `Request` objects with `method`, `url`, `headers`, etc. before passing them to `Session.request`. \n\nCould you refactor this to use a single internal helper (or update `Session.request` to be more flexible) so we don't have to duplicate the argument normalization logic in every single top-level API function? Let's try to reduce the code in `api.py` by moving more logic into the `Request` model or a private helper in `utils.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9c2eb5e1fab5b1eb", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:c5b9a39d0ff9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3587287e-f9a4-432f-a2e1-e2ed06edc4c3"}}
{"id": "dcea8d5bf2258a18", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird issue with `Session.send()`. If I pass a file-like object as data, it seems to consume the stream even if I wrap it in a generator, but the underlying file pointer isn't reset. Can you check `requests/sessions.py` and `requests/models.py` to see how `BodyStream` handles seeking? If the stream doesn't support `seek`, it's failing to retry on redirect after POSTing. Here's the traceback:", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dcea8d5bf2258a18", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:1544c3ed3d3f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c5248f8e-d2ac-4c14-978b-5905e6c6461a"}}
{"id": "853ae49183c49244", "prompt": "I’m trying to parse the response headers and noticed that `r.headers` behaves like a dict. Is it safe to modify these headers before sending a request? For example, adding a custom header.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "853ae49183c49244", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:86e01d621fa3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "73375e14-47ce-4667-a67a-3aabca217130"}}
{"id": "12c82d0e27c1690a", "prompt": "현재 버전이 뭐야? src/requests/__version__.py 확인해서 2.32.0에서 2.32.1로 올려주고 HISTORY.md에 변경사항 한 줄만 추가해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "12c82d0e27c1690a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:ff342dcb8ff0", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28e518ea-4cff-48dd-986f-a6d87403ec8a"}}
{"id": "f7ff8ca8e421402d", "prompt": "Add type hints to `src/requests/cookies.py`. Specifically, `CookieManager` and the `RequestsCookieJar` class methods need proper annotations for Pyright. The current annotations are too loose.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f7ff8ca8e421402d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:9c57440a309d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc75b46f-8941-4028-875c-6c7500cbd065"}}
{"id": "8f6524ece1343a1f", "prompt": "In `requests/__init__.py`, we expose the public API. It's currently just a long list of imports. I want to make this more maintainable.\n\nRefactor `__init__.py` to import submodules explicitly rather than just functions. Create a clean public namespace by defining `__all__` properly and grouping imports into comments or logical blocks. Don't change the importable symbols, just the internal structure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8f6524ece1343a1f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:b72b98493ed5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "677e49bb-f80a-4dd8-8cc5-4afaa76ddb9c"}}
{"id": "c2a9bc1496611035", "prompt": "We're preparing a release. Please extract the version number from `src/requests/__version__.py` and compare it against the version tag mentioned in the README.md badges. Are they consistent? Also, check if HISTORY.md has an entry for the current version yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c2a9bc1496611035", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:9d5aeed9333a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b9150b22-382d-466f-a59e-963f44566c2f"}}
{"id": "2f8f5afe6df26b6d", "prompt": "Fix the type hinting in `src/requests/api.py`. My IDE (PyCharm) complains that the return type of `requests.get()` is `Response | None` but the static type checker (Pyright) says it's always `Response`.\n\nActually, looking at `src/requests/api.py`, `request()` returns `Response`. But there's a bug where if `hooks` raises an exception, it might not be caught correctly in some edge cases, or maybe it's just the type stub.\n\nPlease check `src/requests/api.py` and `src/requests/sessions.py` and ensure the return types are accurate. I want to be able to do `if resp is not None:` without a type error, although I know it shouldn't be None.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2f8f5afe6df26b6d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:a1442bd0c4cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "abbe43f5-8cb3-48bb-b395-a47c954d228b"}}
{"id": "97247285cda902de", "prompt": "Can you find the official documentation for the `auth` parameter in `requests.request()`? I need to know if it supports OAuth 2.0 Bearer tokens out of the box, or if I need a separate package like `requests-oauthlib`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "97247285cda902de", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:ad8773e61675", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b466e668-aebb-4a25-a5f2-102403a692d3"}}
{"id": "122ab520c385d560", "prompt": "I want to standardize our exception handling across the codebase. Currently, `exceptions.py` defines custom exceptions, but the places where we raise `RequestException` or its subclasses (`ConnectionError`, `Timeout`, etc.) are scattered in `adapters.py`, `sessions.py`, and `models.py`.\n\nRefactor these call sites to ensure that we only raise the highest-level relevant exception from the top-level API (`api.py`), and let `sessions.py` and `adapters.py` handle the lower-level details by raising specific ones.\n\nSpecifically, look at `_send_request` in `sessions.py` and `send` in `adapters.py`. Ensure that `ConnectionError` and `Timeout` are caught and wrapped appropriately before bubbling up.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Please check `tests/test_adapters.py` and `tests/test_requests.py` to verify that our test assertions for exception types still match the new hierarchy."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "122ab520c385d560", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:0a6088deff66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "edb1d5f8-28ba-49e9-aadd-10f2b5ae7c7b"}}
{"id": "a46a905d9ccde682", "prompt": "I'm getting a ModuleNotFoundError when trying to use the SOCKS proxy support. The README mentions it but doesn't specify the package name. What do I need to install?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a46a905d9ccde682", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:e1feebb00137", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef290045-3876-4282-b33a-452b8590c912"}}
{"id": "3c5c15985221c695", "prompt": "Find the commit that added the type annotation for `Request.hooks` in src/requests/models.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3c5c15985221c695", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:73ba933cb712", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2d3e829-ae9f-404f-a147-11c624c02a03"}}
{"id": "bdeeba1cdfb94d9f", "prompt": "I'm seeing some issues with how files are being detected. Check the history of src/requests/utils.py to see when the logic for file wrappers was last touched.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the changes in commit 6f205ff specifically."}, {"prompt": "Did that change affect src/requests/_internal_utils.py as well?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bdeeba1cdfb94d9f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:9e8d1b659544", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "052d165c-fb97-40cf-9f8f-8913692ebb3c"}}
{"id": "33f6308d5bc23f39", "prompt": "I've finished refactoring `src/requests/utils.py` and `src/requests/sessions.py`. Can you split my current uncommitted changes into two logical commits and commit them?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "33f6308d5bc23f39", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:fb19ac1f2ce1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6787ad57-5678-43fa-a042-0947fe18a96b"}}
{"id": "ec89e53214be6001", "prompt": "The `_encode_files` detection in `src/requests/utils.py` seems to have been recently updated. Can you show me the logic used to identify if a file wrapper is compatible?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ec89e53214be6001", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:f8041077517e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d64dca4-e395-44bb-8181-0bd9cc9f66d6"}}
{"id": "cdb06bac667639e7", "prompt": "Commit everything currently in my working directory. Use a standard conventional commit message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cdb06bac667639e7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:ac5ec7854e99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b423992-7584-434d-be07-1f1158bf9903"}}
{"id": "1f691111d62e0906", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/requests/adapters.py`. How does the `send` method handle the preparation of a request before it's dispatched?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1f691111d62e0906", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:d3b5bc8e0ac0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99ec36eb-30e7-4671-b918-f32acbc689a4"}}
{"id": "cf15455479d2b358", "prompt": "The CI is getting a bit slow with all the linting. I want to consolidate some of our linting/type practices.\n\n- Check `pyproject.toml` and `tox.ini` to see if we can unify some of the Ruff and Pyright configurations.\n- Specifically, look at the 'commonly ignored Pyright linting rules' mentioned in commit 661970d and see if any of them can now be re-enabled after our recent type improvements in `src/requests/_types.py`.\n- Update `tests/conftest.py` if any new fixtures are required for the updated linting environment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf15455479d2b358", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:52f5230c56c8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "69e4eef4-4420-4f6b-aa9c-8a6ede52598f"}}
{"id": "7405a8145426e1f4", "prompt": "In `src/requests/utils.py`, the function `get_netrc_auth` is checking for username and password. If the netrc file contains a password that is `None` (which can happen with older files or specific parsers), the function currently returns `('', None)` or similar. However, `requests.auth.HTTPBasicAuth` expects both to be strings.\n\nCan you update `get_netrc_auth` to ensure it returns `None` entirely if the password is missing or falsy, rather than a tuple with a `None` value? This prevents errors downstream in `Session.request`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7405a8145426e1f4", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:6c8851bd37ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5d285f1-d961-4167-8eef-c17208134f5c"}}
{"id": "4b584e7650147e67", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of refactoring `src/requests/auth.py` but it's breaking the build. Stash my current work so I can switch back to `main` and check the current state.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b584e7650147e67", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:c0fd19949df3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9963263f-7edb-49c6-b915-6571548faa5e"}}
{"id": "bf03fa77902eee56", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing some type issues. Can you check `src/requests/_types.py` and tell me how `Request` and `Response` are typed? Specifically, look at the recent change in commit 1190afd that added annotations for `Request.hooks`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf03fa77902eee56", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:01d5c8ffd81d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "589d4ddc-1f26-4472-8c55-ac8f58a9c391"}}
{"id": "57489df47a24a1e7", "prompt": "The `src/requests/exceptions.py` module has a bunch of custom exception classes that are essentially copy-pastes of each other with different docstrings and names. For example, `RequestException`, `HTTPError`, `ConnectionError`, `Timeout`, `TooManyRedirects`. They all inherit from `RequestException` and have identical `__init__` signatures.\n\nPlease write a script or modify the module to use a factory function or a base class metaclass to generate these exception classes automatically. I want to see a significant reduction in the lines of code in this file while keeping the public API identical. Run the tests afterwards to make sure imports still work.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "57489df47a24a1e7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:2d8a23f80201", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb7b8694-0697-4b9a-85be-5a1330e4e6a7"}}
{"id": "e7ca9f88b187876a", "prompt": "Can you add a type hint to the `Request.hooks` attribute in `src/requests/models.py` to match the recent changes in the repo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e7ca9f88b187876a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:439b2384844a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e23cef45-9ec7-468d-a839-f841caa2fb86"}}
{"id": "c41c3414aa8c8a7b", "prompt": "can you show me the commit 6f66281 and explain what was added to the protocol isinstance checks?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c41c3414aa8c8a7b", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:7865f3a3c5a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ed2ed34-307a-4391-bb89-ef734753a745"}}
{"id": "674dcbc5e2400601", "prompt": "I'm trying to clean up the dependencies. Can you parse `requirements-dev.txt` and `pyproject.toml` and list out any duplicate packages between them? I want to make sure we aren't specifying the same library in both places with potentially conflicting version constraints.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "674dcbc5e2400601", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:ecbd0aa976e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b6e1441-d987-413e-a95a-129832b3c2c5"}}
{"id": "00a5e7c266ebb776", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/requests/models.py`. How is the `Request` object constructed, and does it perform any validation on the URL or headers during initialization?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "00a5e7c266ebb776", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:79c538d5cc9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99ef7e68-14c0-48c8-9223-5a2dbc2b8f3a"}}
{"id": "195ccb0f2993af2e", "prompt": "In `requests/sessions.py`, walk me through the logic of `Session.request`. I need to know exactly how the `Timeout` object and the `request` method from `adapters.py` interact during the actual send phase. Specifically, does the timeout apply to the connect step or the entire transfer?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "195ccb0f2993af2e", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:ac3b54a64570", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "845d8ff9-9d46-419f-bd5d-d26c62473786"}}
{"id": "e51fffccc315f9bf", "prompt": "Look at `src/requests/models.py`. How is the `PreparedRequest` class implemented, and how does it differ from a standard `Request` object?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e51fffccc315f9bf", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:90a35dc5b191", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fcbaf6d-b9cf-4a6d-bf2c-943484372b2c"}}
{"id": "34de86a58381caca", "prompt": "Can you look at `pyproject.toml` and `setup.py`? I know setup.py is legacy, but I want to make sure the dependencies listed there match exactly what's in pyproject.toml's [project.dependencies]. Don't just tell me they are different, actually list the discrepancies.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "34de86a58381caca", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:f97aceda972d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d015c7a4-7648-4b51-8c40-a01331e0f427"}}
{"id": "9b958015e420315a", "prompt": "Hey, can you spin up a local instance of the test server defined in `tests/testserver/server.py`? I need it running on port 5050 in the background while I manually inspect the response headers for a specific endpoint. Let me know when it's ready.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b958015e420315a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:1dc76cefd232", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5858a032-cfa5-43db-9127-3058f95980ad"}}
{"id": "fbe95e4e5bc81ec8", "prompt": "Show me the diff between the current state of src/requests/api.py and the version from commit 6f205ff.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fbe95e4e5bc81ec8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:f9b8d10cbdff", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "007d7c32-3271-40e9-93db-20842c60e763"}}
{"id": "50163ee3939f8cee", "prompt": "I'm looking at `sessions.py` and `api.py`. There's a lot of duplication in how we build the `PreparedRequest` object. Specifically, the flow of taking kwargs, applying auth, applying cookies, and encoding the body is repeated in `request()` and `Session.request()` with slight variations.\n\nRefactor this into a unified `Session._build_request_body(request, kwargs)` method inside `sessions.py` or a new internal method in `sessions.py` that `api.py` calls. Keep the public API of `requests.get/post/etc` identical.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, that looks cleaner. Can you also check `adapters.py`? Ensure the connection pooling logic doesn't duplicate any of the timeout logic we just centralized in `sessions.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "50163ee3939f8cee", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:60c195062b98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c31dcd1b-a1d1-4575-be43-3761bf5b4125"}}
{"id": "27b9e253ca2b6791", "prompt": "Look at `src/requests/adapters.py`. How does the `HTTPAdapter` manage the connection pool?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What's the default pool size configured in the adapter?"}, {"prompt": "How does it handle retries if a connection fails?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "27b9e253ca2b6791", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:96c36ee9d2c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a3afea3b-42f2-4b7d-aedf-4fca7f0132da"}}
{"id": "7db94d89109d16fd", "prompt": "Hey, I'm getting a TypeError when trying to verify ssl certs with a custom CA bundle. The traceback points to `requests/certs.py` but I need to understand why. Can you check how the `cacert` path is resolved and if there's any fallback mechanism?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7db94d89109d16fd", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:6002ca7df1ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6e96bd1-585c-420e-9543-38bce7746bf4"}}
{"id": "4de44b672109d6a2", "prompt": "where's the retry logic? I thought requests did automatic retries on 5xx errors.\n\nI see a lot of chatter about `urllib3.util.Retry` in the issues but I can't seem to find where that's instantiated or used in the main requests src code. Does requests even support retries out of the box or do I need to hook into it myself?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4de44b672109d6a2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:649f1e98f524", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ac79b302-dcd3-4b42-8eff-710e28b263d2"}}
{"id": "d1bb8d45bdc6c805", "prompt": "Run the pre-commit hooks to format and lint the codebase. If there are any linting errors that aren't just style issues (like type errors), fix those too. Then verify the build succeeds.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d1bb8d45bdc6c805", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:d703d7ba45b3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7451e878-ef7a-4fed-860b-0bc4b1e36a83"}}
{"id": "89f76edb3612951f", "prompt": "Give me a quick way to generate a temporary secret key for the local dev environment, similar to a Django secret key but just a plain string.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "89f76edb3612951f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:cd44f55667be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf5232c5-5d07-43e2-be6f-b0e404f2795a"}}
{"id": "7ffd273d1f9b6159", "prompt": "I noticed we have a `tests/certs/` directory with various CA and server certificates. Can you verify that none of these private keys (`*.key`) are actually committed to the repo? I see `tests/certs/expired/ca/ca-private.key` and `tests/certs/mtls/client/client.key`. I'm worried that if we are storing test keys in the repo, they might be scraped by bots. If they are there, confirm if they are dummy/test keys only.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7ffd273d1f9b6159", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:99e8c58a5435", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a04ef40b-b3dc-493e-9606-92c2cf0711fc"}}
{"id": "b42521101b40d28c", "prompt": "The .gitignore file looks a bit messy lately. Can you scan it and identify any lines that might be too broad or conflicting with the other ignore rules? Also, please check if `ext/*.ai` and `src/requests/py.typed` are accounted for correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b42521101b40d28c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:b52d3d6cc8cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80bcdd1d-1869-4569-8a69-ca32f79823a5"}}
{"id": "0d797f68bbfb17f2", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify src/requests/sessions.py and what was their intention?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the diff of that last commit?"}, {"prompt": "What other files were changed in that same commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0d797f68bbfb17f2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:cf77dac878a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9e1282ec-524a-4c03-aaa1-12dfd2d7465e"}}
{"id": "df84f35e49720fd5", "prompt": "Check pyproject.toml and requirements-dev.txt. We need to upgrade ruff to the latest version. See if there are any breaking changes in the newer versions that would affect our current linting setup.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "df84f35e49720fd5", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:b7446d2f79bc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "52415594-8f3c-478b-ac10-56d9d8774629"}}
{"id": "3aaa1ecf484d1a63", "prompt": "Peux-tu exécuter le linter (ruff ou flake8, selon la config), formater le code avec black, et corriger automatiquement les erreurs que tu peux ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3aaa1ecf484d1a63", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:023bdafa1059", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d719aba6-b6e8-4db4-b611-dbc83fe5eb4b"}}
{"id": "5e85afb1df2f814e", "prompt": "I want to delete src/requests/help.py. It hasn't been updated in years and we've migrated that info to the docs site. Remove the file, delete the import in __init__.py, and remove the `requests.help` entry point if it exists in pyproject.toml.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5e85afb1df2f814e", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:0d1357eb6a14", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3559ff3d-6707-4362-b4f5-cddb599633b0"}}
{"id": "4760a2b2d815bb85", "prompt": "git log --since=\"24 hours ago\" --pretty=format:\"%h - %an, %s\" --name-only로 오늘 바뀐 파일들을 간단하게 보여줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4760a2b2d815bb85", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:2013a8107fe6", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9238fe40-6b34-4f1c-b631-fe88dc78e330"}}
{"id": "0aeba29da16eccb0", "prompt": "Can you check if upgrading the 'actions/setup-python' version in our workflow would impact our testing environment? I noticed a lot of recent bumps in the commit history.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0aeba29da16eccb0", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:e24ceedb3b4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a7f77cad-b41b-41c0-b3d7-ffdfcca2b189"}}
{"id": "8331f66e955d74cf", "prompt": "What is the purpose of `src/requests/_internal_utils.py`? Does it contain any helpers used by the main `api.py` functions?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8331f66e955d74cf", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:4a57d7c60c86", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c7ddfbe-8df3-4908-bc3f-8b1bf6555ac3"}}
{"id": "42b1aff546424b11", "prompt": "In `structures.py`, there's a `CaseInsensitiveDict`. Why is this used instead of a standard dict? What are the performance implications?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "42b1aff546424b11", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:4efdfbe4118a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ac1f2b0e-ce38-46f2-a039-787c5cdcc7e3"}}
{"id": "9d2e44ed42775ff8", "prompt": "The `models.py` file has a messy `RequestEncodingMixin`. I want to clean up the `_encode_files` logic. Currently, it relies on duck typing checks spread across `utils.py` and `models.py`. Can you refactor this into a single, clearly defined helper in `utils.py` called `_is_file_like_object` and update all call sites in `models.py` to use it? Maintain current behavior but make the intent explicit.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d2e44ed42775ff8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "requests:3d5b6c3c53a4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "662b763d-954c-4dd9-af4f-6094b7938a55"}}
{"id": "30ca69edf9e32d15", "prompt": "In `src/requests/models.py`, the `RequestEncodingMixin.encode_chunked` method seems to have a bug. If I pass `chunked=True` in the request options, it sets the header. But if I pass a very small body, urllib3 adds its own Transfer-Encoding header, and we end up with duplicates.\n\nHere is the code snippet:\n\n```python\n# src/requests/models.py\n...\ndef encode_chunked(self, chunks):\n    if self._should_updata_header('Transfer-Encoding', 'chunked'):\n        self.headers['Transfer-Encoding'] = 'chunked'\n```\n\nIt's checking `if self.chunked:` instead of checking if the header is *already* present. Can you fix this logic to avoid duplicate headers?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "30ca69edf9e32d15", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:2b88e517ba99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6014d582-9200-4ecf-a887-7e4608ab7035"}}
{"id": "50279e5a6758c0c9", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/requests/sessions.py` and I see we're using `urllib3` for connection pooling. The documentation for `urllib3.util.Retry` seems to have changed between v1 and v2. Can you check the official `urllib3` migration guide or docs to see if `total_retries` is still a valid parameter or if we need to switch to `Retry(total=...)`? We're currently supporting Python 3.10+ so we might be on a newer urllib3 version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "50279e5a6758c0c9", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:a6569f0d38cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05803d7e-64f2-4ae5-b529-1f70bc1468ad"}}
{"id": "06c0d0ed1c81b54f", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird type errors in CI lately. Can you audit our dependencies listed in setup.py and pyproject.toml for any outdated packages that might be causing conflicts with our current Python 3.10+ target?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06c0d0ed1c81b54f", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:1fb3fc827ccb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d5a22ab7-51d2-4bac-a34a-a65b0b7945f1"}}
{"id": "8f4f1c7815e3f295", "prompt": "I need to add a new authentication method. Can you show me where `src/requests/auth.py` defines the base requirements for an auth handler?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8f4f1c7815e3f295", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:0688df1e265e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d8aa073-e55c-452b-b704-68caf2887cba"}}
{"id": "2b1f6cdc687ce73a", "prompt": "Can you add a type hint to the `Request.hooks` attribute in `src/requests/models.py`? I want to make sure it matches the documentation we added recently.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks. Now create a new branch called `feature/type-annotations` and commit this change with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2b1f6cdc687ce73a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:6e48e18cb6fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "44a908f4-16a4-4caf-8271-c96f111d2426"}}
{"id": "6b1bd21a665041c0", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of experimenting with `src/requests/auth.py` but I need to switch to a clean state to fix a high-priority bug. Stash my current work.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b1bd21a665041c0", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:adfe69cff23f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d76dc7ee-b17e-4898-a30c-87f1f0f480dc"}}
{"id": "4ae18419d214782a", "prompt": "What does the `requests.exceptions.ConnectionError` documentation say about retrying failed requests? Specifically, is there a recommended pattern for exponential backoff in the official examples?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4ae18419d214782a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:79378218203b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d38d9c64-9d78-4cdb-b886-0dd2afe00814"}}
{"id": "c2c9a7ff16a99d3d", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `ext/` directory. How many SVG or PNG logo variants do we have? List them out. Also, check if `.gitignore` is ignoring the `*.ai` file but not the others correctly. I want to ensure the repo doesn't bloat with unnecessary design assets when cloned.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c2c9a7ff16a99d3d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:982d5aea9fee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50b4a975-88f2-4ebc-8bc9-b02a493ef8e1"}}
{"id": "3dcf81758b0f5c42", "prompt": "Can you look up the latest documentation for urllib3 regarding the 'timeout' parameter in `urllib3.HTTPConnectionPool.request`? I need to know the difference between 'read' and 'connect' timeouts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3dcf81758b0f5c42", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:c76a0062d6ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "016cdf67-981f-4881-a794-4d48a3e1ae8c"}}
{"id": "196975c3ae5872db", "prompt": "I'm seeing `MissingSchema` errors in my test suite when I pass URLs like `localhost:8080/api`. I know the `Request` class in `models.py` does URL validation, but I want to understand exactly why `http://` is mandatory. Is there a config flag to disable this, or is it hardcoded in the `Request` preparation logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "196975c3ae5872db", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:dd21c0ab83cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e9da7a4-bc68-40ed-b416-499ea6671c1a"}}
{"id": "0dba38446951d62b", "prompt": "Run the full test suite in the background and watch for failures. I know `test_help.py` sometimes times out on slow CI machines. Keep an eye on it and let me know if it fails more than twice in a row.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If the tests finish successfully, generate a coverage report for `src/requests/utils.py` and `src/requests/exceptions.py`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0dba38446951d62b", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:f9a7012be2e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d23203ee-97e1-46f5-a707-4227672a5229"}}
{"id": "b8046d46c9405fd2", "prompt": "Finde heraus, woher der Timeout-Defaultwert kommt. Ich meine den, wenn ich `requests.get()` ohne `timeout` aufrufe. Ist das in `adapters.py` oder eher in `utils.py` festgelegt?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b8046d46c9405fd2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:6ea7553a6c3e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "744edb0b-35b0-449c-aed5-3f834ec912ae"}}
{"id": "0efee64bab3626ed", "prompt": "Hey, I need to audit our dependencies. Can you scan pyproject.toml and requirements-dev.txt and give me a list of every external package name, regardless of version specifier? I just want the raw names. Also, check if there are any version constraints that use the '==' operator versus others.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0efee64bab3626ed", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:9c43f3280525", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ae053ae-d22f-4011-bd99-f8f1f8ca1481"}}
{"id": "482ccd29de627d65", "prompt": "Does Requests support SOCKS proxies natively? I see a bullet point in the README, but I can't install the dependency through pip. How do I set it up?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What is the correct proxy string format for a SOCKS5 proxy with authentication?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "482ccd29de627d65", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:b5cf545d17b5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01518122-819a-45e2-a629-e8f71386f4aa"}}
{"id": "a2aef84e766e3b6e", "prompt": "The current README doesn't mention our new support for Python 3.10+. Please update the 'Installing Requests and Supported Versions' section to reflect this change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a2aef84e766e3b6e", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "requests:4eb9212611a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfd289c9-6b83-4501-8057-f28d88323811"}}
{"id": "de050fa55e40e8f1", "prompt": "The project supports Python 3.10+. Is there a specific reason for this version pin? Does it use any f-string features or typing annotations that require 3.10?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "de050fa55e40e8f1", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:791ab9948e20", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7d4fb8b-164e-4792-a84d-43aac9ff1434"}}
{"id": "e821eb5a65719a4a", "prompt": "Can you look up the current recommendation for handling TLS certificates in Python 3.10+? I see we have a bundle in `src/requests/certs.py` and test certs in `tests/certs/`. I want to know if the official Python docs suggest using the system store (`truststore`) instead of maintaining our own `certifi` bundle anymore. I'm reading about `truststore` but I'm not sure if it's stable enough for Requests to switch to.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e821eb5a65719a4a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:577c6619cd0d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ea002e6-bea7-4d33-84db-e7c68abdd505"}}
{"id": "83141ba8ab128c27", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/test_requests.py` that verifies the behavior of `requests.get` when provided with a custom `auth` tuple.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "83141ba8ab128c27", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:40a931882c0c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29f8a924-9299-42a9-9b09-80f97a2906a6"}}
{"id": "869f3edf087ea7f9", "prompt": "Hey, I'm getting a weird TypeError when passing a custom object to the `data` param of `requests.post()`. The error traceback is pasted below. Can you look at `src/requests/models.py` and `src/requests/utils.py` and explain why this is happening? I think we're missing a hasattr check for some protocol.\n\n```python\nTypeError: Object of type CustomFileWrapper is not JSON serializable\n```", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "869f3edf087ea7f9", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:a1e3edc3f65e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bcb54a3-6068-48e6-8c12-6c04f2ca152b"}}
{"id": "32fce62b09316916", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error when trying to pass a file-like object that uses `__getattr__`. Can you look at `src/requests/utils.py` and check if `_encode_files` handles those correctly? Reference the fix in commit `6f205ff` if possible.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "32fce62b09316916", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:72fd1c156e95", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "899400bf-6c27-4c74-9eaf-02ce6c58f429"}}
{"id": "dafb07763e13d387", "prompt": "Ist das hier Absicht? Ich sehe in `__version__.py` die Versionsnummer. Wo wird diese Konstante sonst noch im Code referenziert? Ich will wissen, ob es Abhängigkeiten gibt, die kaputtgehen, wenn ich die baue.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dafb07763e13d387", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:63d5b0254116", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6eb89606-c011-41c7-b303-18bd2a54c22e"}}
{"id": "8289af6880cef589", "prompt": "Add a type hint for the `hooks` attribute in the `Request` class within `src/requests/models.py` to match the recent changes in the commit history.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8289af6880cef589", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:fedf6f69e6ad", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "db3fd76d-243c-458f-820d-e981c5e76967"}}
{"id": "21443f8afe421fff", "prompt": "Can you list all the local branches in this repo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "21443f8afe421fff", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:18cceeff2561", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26977063-bc35-444c-bf9b-964ef0399f59"}}
{"id": "42155f61ec4eb398", "prompt": "The `requests.utils.get_encoding_from_headers` function is returning 'UTF-8' by default even when the body is clearly GBK encoded and the headers don't specify charset. \n\nCan you adjust the fallback logic in `utils.py`? It should probably respect the `chardet` library's suggestion or allow the user to disable auto-detection via a session config. Currently it hardcodes UTF-8 if no Content-Type charset is present.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "42155f61ec4eb398", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:5bf8a3ec660c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "72d8db82-6a40-49df-b468-ec761a837816"}}
{"id": "c3b24112ffacb9c6", "prompt": "In `src/requests/auth.py`, how are the different authentication handlers implemented? Is there a base class that `BasicAuth` inherits from?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c3b24112ffacb9c6", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:e5e7c7c3f62d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "30649a63-1d39-4fe5-a787-d80537abdd92"}}
{"id": "93f77d05350a6751", "prompt": "Est-ce que le site httpbin.org est actuellement accessible ? J'essaie de lancer les tests mais ça semble bloqué.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "93f77d05350a6751", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:79de315cbf11", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a02985f6-f03d-4849-b70f-f21b16f1f459"}}
{"id": "3801ce7d27fa3143", "prompt": "Run the benchmark script against the current HEAD. I want to compare the performance of the `json` payload encoding versus manual `json.dumps` in the `prepare_body` method. Paste the output here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3801ce7d27fa3143", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:75b811d68548", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0044ba7-8aca-4b39-9a33-a7d3068efc90"}}
{"id": "b3ac478e1f14bce7", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic in `src/requests/sessions.py` that handles cookie persistence? I want to know how it interacts with `src/requests/cookies.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b3ac478e1f14bce7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:ac29a1c1f46b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3d03d83-0d83-4f37-9d80-35a854c9485e"}}
{"id": "f83f0ba512275719", "prompt": "I need to add type hints to `src/requests/utils.py`. Specifically, the `_get_content_length` function. Can you find where this is called from most frequently so I know what input types to expect?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also, list any other untyped utility functions in that file that might be good candidates for immediate fixes."}, {"prompt": "Check if `py.typed` exists in the package root, I want to make sure we're good to go for distribution."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f83f0ba512275719", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:bb64253650df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87da148b-be10-4060-829e-3a4108489e22"}}
{"id": "c5d5b5a0762480c9", "prompt": "The pre-commit hooks are failing on my machine with `ruff: unrecognized option '--fix-only'`. I'm using an older version of ruff. Can you update `.pre-commit-config.yaml` to use a compatible version or adjust the hook arguments?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c5d5b5a0762480c9", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:ce06e03a6708", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56d50ab8-f793-4260-b92c-8342ec8a4f03"}}
{"id": "cd296a727d05a00b", "prompt": "We're seeing a lot of questions about SSL verification failures. Can we tweak the error message in src/requests/exceptions.py for `SSLError` to be more specific about checking certificate paths? Something like: 'SSL error: Certificate verification failed. Check your CA bundle or use verify=False for testing.'", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good, but can you also update the docstring in src/requests/api.py where this exception is raised to reflect the new hint?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cd296a727d05a00b", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:b2ec67ed1c14", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11cd2f51-83b0-41d4-a3e4-e093a97ba832"}}
{"id": "02ef064fa491c95e", "prompt": "Looking at .pre-commit-config.yaml.\n\nI need to know the minimum Python version required by this project based strictly on this file and pyproject.toml. Also, extract the exact version string from src/requests/__version__.py and tell me if it matches the version badge in the README.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "02ef064fa491c95e", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:873df5e7b5ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad5f319a-ba09-4ea7-bdde-da2872f5d610"}}
{"id": "3f7665fa9f87ed18", "prompt": "I need to understand how Requests handles connection timeouts. Can you trace the flow from the user passing `timeout=t` in `requests.get()` all the way to where it's actually passed to the underlying socket or adapter? Find the specific files and functions involved.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3f7665fa9f87ed18", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:aa2bb4071978", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86ef6035-a7f0-4b91-bf7c-9ae843e8d10b"}}
{"id": "d8375657158bd38d", "prompt": "把 `src/requests/models.py` 里的 `PreparedRequest` 类里的 `url` 属性重命名为 `prepared_url`，记得同步更新所有引用的地方。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d8375657158bd38d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:fec9d7f990ea", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21eb1f3f-95dc-4954-b353-6405c3e70a27"}}
{"id": "e8cbe0fc046d5e79", "prompt": "Can you explain how the session persistence for cookies is implemented in `src/requests/sessions.py`? I want to understand how it interacts with the cookie jar.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e8cbe0fc046d5e79", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:dd28232ee66d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b0a594a-9dad-4c99-93c2-01c74003ca24"}}
{"id": "fd6fa14776aab285", "prompt": "I get a TypeError when passing a custom object to `requests.delete()`: \n\n```\nTypeError: the JSON object must be str, bytes or bytearray, not DeleteRequest\n```\n\nThis happens when I do something like:\n`requests.delete('http://example.com', json=MyCustomObject())`\n\nI know `MyCustomObject` doesn't have a default JSON representation, but shouldn't requests just raise a clear serialization error instead of crashing inside the json handling logic? Please improve the error handling in `requests/adapters.py` or `requests/models.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fd6fa14776aab285", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:27358507159e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a232d177-b5f7-4b8c-9b9c-371608e6f282"}}
{"id": "8e52192366fba5a1", "prompt": "The `prepare_body` method in src/requests/models.py is huge. Can you refactor the part that handles `data` parameter serialization (specifically the dict to form-encoded logic) into a new private helper method called `_prepare_data`? Keep the logic inside models.py.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8e52192366fba5a1", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:19fc4b008dda", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d23621c2-b118-40b4-9333-f321d2af3395"}}
{"id": "da0f0c2fb0699143", "prompt": "Kill any existing processes running the pytest suite so I can start a fresh run.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "da0f0c2fb0699143", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:a7d6d7a89d2a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e70c4c37-c00c-4289-8124-3069f6300f81"}}
{"id": "28868d9edfc8ebab", "prompt": "Kannst du bitte grep-en, wo `PreparedRequest` überall instantiiert wird? Ich verfolge den Weg von `requests.request` bis zum Adapter. Wo genau wird das Request-Objekt final 'geschickt'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "28868d9edfc8ebab", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:3d9f1ae20f55", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0b3f114a-da78-4a83-99ff-2094b577df7b"}}
{"id": "1e1b2275e1812e07", "prompt": "I'm seeing DeprecationWarning for HTTP header casing. I checked the Requests docs but couldn't find a clear migration guide for v2.x to v3.x regarding header handling. Can you search for any official migration notes or blog posts explaining how to handle case-insensitivity now?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e1b2275e1812e07", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:f2ea9ca4d3be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18cc3edd-a899-480c-95c3-856f684fd842"}}
{"id": "0218f5c9798b3eba", "prompt": "Hey, ich hab' ein Problem mit Cookies über mehrere Subdomains hinweg. Wo wird in der Session-Logik der `CookieJar` eigentlich initialisiert und wo die Persistenz geregelt? Ich suche in `sessions.py` und `cookies.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0218f5c9798b3eba", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:3a5e8f1b3736", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "79123edf-cd41-476c-8265-cca6291e04e4"}}
{"id": "e239dae9ef950aac", "prompt": "TODO 주석이 전체 코드에 몇 개나 있어? 파일 경로와 함께 나열해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e239dae9ef950aac", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:12de2ff14bc7", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "569c5c34-2884-4705-acd4-d2533a03e68b"}}
{"id": "1a5e6033ecb17b72", "prompt": "I can't find where the default User-Agent string is set. It's showing up in my requests but I don't see it in my code. Can you track it down?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1a5e6033ecb17b72", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:8a3e691db359", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fef8669c-fff1-42aa-a27c-c797b3246449"}}
{"id": "c0379f053875d4d8", "prompt": "I'm getting a ConnectionError when trying to use the built-in certificates. Have you updated the CA bundle recently? Is there a way to force Requests to use the system's CA store instead of its own bundled certs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c0379f053875d4d8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:41ee191a8938", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c12a915-b8e9-43b9-8b43-38f099b15122"}}
{"id": "5631ba2899d3309a", "prompt": "Refactor the following tasks to improve maintainability:\n- Standardize docstrings across `src/requests/auth.py` and `src/requests/adapters.py`.\n- Move some of the logic from `src/requests/sessions.py` into `src/requests/utils.py` where it makes sense.\n- Clean up unused imports in `src/requests/cookies.py` and `src/requests/exceptions.py`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5631ba2899d3309a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:b94363584e1c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba7613dd-83b5-4312-82b4-b185954d2309"}}
{"id": "22b3b0ff91f067d8", "prompt": "帮我在 `src/requests/utils.py` 里添加一个简单的工具函数 `is_valid_url(url: str) -> bool`，目前只要能通过基础正则校验就行。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "22b3b0ff91f067d8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:41188768c086", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "89e376ba-594e-4091-8070-d7c8edcb19ce"}}
{"id": "82ca2efee2856c8c", "prompt": "Run the benchmark suite in `tests/benchmarks/`. I want to see if the recent changes to `src/requests/adapters.py` improved connection pooling performance. Output should be in JSON format.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "82ca2efee2856c8c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:63f4f37ac1fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12a7623a-93be-4bc6-b859-9d65a2858d62"}}
{"id": "81d12e0bc5fce371", "prompt": "Hey, the `requests.get()` function in `src/requests/api.py` is supposed to support a `timeout` parameter. I'm passing `timeout=5` but it seems to be ignored for the connection phase in `src/requests/adapters.py`.\n\nI'm using a custom adapter that inherits from `HTTPAdapter`. When I call `get`, the connection hangs for 30 seconds instead of timing out at 5.\n\nCan you check `src/requests/adapters.py` and see how `timeout` is passed to `urllib3`? I suspect it's not being unpacked correctly into `urlopen_kwargs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81d12e0bc5fce371", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:10a9df879cee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63506943-be83-41b5-8500-39e4283f0d49"}}
{"id": "399a4e8e54df7ab2", "prompt": "I'm seeing inconsistent behavior with file uploads in some edge cases. Can you investigate and fix these two things:\n- Look at `src/requests/utils.py` and see if we can improve the `_encode_files` logic to better handle file-like objects that implement `__getattr__` (referencing the fix in 6f205ff).\n- Check `src/requests/models.py` to ensure the `PreparedRequest` correctly handles these wrapped file objects.\n\nMake sure to add a new test case in `tests/test_requests.py` that reproduces the detection issue.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "399a4e8e54df7ab2", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:fab17a48c67c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a9b24c4-f410-4aab-b452-336ff5cff5ea"}}
{"id": "3fdf37af5e15609a", "prompt": "where's the retry logic in this codebase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3fdf37af5e15609a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:d232349fd825", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8fb2f60e-d8ce-4de0-a113-42b44af86b56"}}
{"id": "d82a7a50805c38ad", "prompt": "The `status_codes` module maps `200` to `'OK'`. However, I'm hitting a server that returns `200` with a custom reason phrase `Payment Required` or something weird. `requests` ignores the reason phrase and uses the standard mapping.\n\nI want `requests` to respect the raw reason phrase from the HTTP response if it's present, even for known status codes.\n\nPlease modify `src/requests/models.py` in the `Response` class to store the raw reason phrase if it differs from the standard mapping, or just expose it directly from the underlying urllib3/httplib object.\n\nAlso update `src/requests/status_codes.py` comments to reflect this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d82a7a50805c38ad", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:48f97496c62a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78cedf3b-f11b-435f-b872-c7e1ac555e35"}}
{"id": "7335299ffbc78606", "prompt": "I need to optimize `src/requests/sessions.py`. Specifically the `merge_setting` function. Can you run the benchmarks in `benchmarks/` (if they exist) or write a quick micro-benchmark comparing the current implementation against a simpler dict merge? Paste the results here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7335299ffbc78606", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:4f20ff08ea3a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "24b459c0-da6a-4547-b93f-909614f942e1"}}
{"id": "686c198cf5e135d7", "prompt": "Le fichier `.idea/` pollue mon dépôt local. Ajoute une règle appropriée dans `.gitignore` pour l'ignorer définitivement. Vérifie aussi qu'il n'est pas déjà présent.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "686c198cf5e135d7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:9f6c575f2514", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cfbf6632-6b6a-40de-80ed-d3db0ad2f242"}}
{"id": "ffb445b5e470dbe4", "prompt": "I'm looking for the latest CVEs related to Python requests library or urllib3. Can you search for recent security advisories? Specifically, I want to know if there's any new vulnerability disclosed in the last 30 days that affects our setup.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Based on the CVEs, can you check our requirements-dev.txt to see if we're using a vulnerable version?"}, {"prompt": "If we are vulnerable, what is the minimum version we need to upgrade to?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ffb445b5e470dbe4", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:8cb786812a1b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ccd389a-e156-41b8-b13a-3e6f0e4d6269"}}
{"id": "fc2d38d2e2be96c7", "prompt": "I'm looking at the README and it says Requests supports International Domains and URLs. How exactly does the library handle IDNA encoding for hostnames compared to just passing the string directly?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fc2d38d2e2be96c7", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:af53f6468f49", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a499cf94-b62a-44ed-bcbc-f3e2bee13a87"}}
{"id": "c6d580f14db6e8f8", "prompt": "Hey, can you check the PyPI page for the latest version of `idna`? I think we might have a conflict in `setup.py` or `pyproject.toml`. I'm seeing some warnings during `pip install -e .` about version incompatibilities, but I can't tell if it's a real breakage or just a soft deprecation warning from pip.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c6d580f14db6e8f8", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:a5419aa5056b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2bb2e9bb-cfd5-4520-96f5-523e880ab41b"}}
{"id": "b7b7e656ce66c3a1", "prompt": "We are migrating to Python 3.10+ (as per README) and want to ensure we don't have any security regressions. Specifically, look at `src/requests/compat.py` and `src/requests/_types.py`. Are we relying on any deprecated SSL defaults that changed in newer Python versions? Also, check `pyproject.toml` to ensure we aren't pinning vulnerable versions of `urllib3` or `certifi`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the version pins in `pyproject.toml` to the latest secure versions if they are outdated."}, {"prompt": "List any changes required in `compat.py` to align with modern Python security standards."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b7b7e656ce66c3a1", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:8b3bce53e2e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d915866f-d36d-4792-a61b-0325afc8461d"}}
{"id": "fc4c9d3da12bf50d", "prompt": "Add a type hint to the `Request.hooks` attribute in `src/requests/models.py` to match what we discussed in the recent PR.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, now commit this change. Create a new branch called `feature/typing-hooks` and use a descriptive commit message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fc4c9d3da12bf50d", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:2a0af02ce1bd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12107d7f-8a70-4f26-b4f2-9b86cad94d09"}}
{"id": "80859137a3f4ef59", "prompt": "Update the AUTHORS.rst file to include the new contributors from the last few release cycles. I'll provide the names in a second.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "80859137a3f4ef59", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "requests:02075ae299ca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "609e5494-dd4f-48c0-9766-3d375a065383"}}
{"id": "dfdbeda3b9c350bb", "prompt": "How does Requests handle cookie persistence across requests? If I use a Session, are cookies stored in memory or on disk? What happens if I mix Session objects with the global module-level functions?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dfdbeda3b9c350bb", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:c1ee9dad6cd8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a4cf081-e0dd-49fa-abf2-6bd3d8e9783f"}}
{"id": "cd0c6316b91384c3", "prompt": "Can you check if there are any python processes running that might be holding onto the ports used by the testserver?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cd0c6316b91384c3", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:e432151df20f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1bc3920-8eeb-49d3-8af0-0085d7e766c8"}}
{"id": "26205c1442ee4d17", "prompt": "What does the `requests.exceptions.ConnectionError` documentation say about the `request` attribute? I'm debugging an issue in `tests/test_requests.py` where the error object doesn't seem to have the request attached in certain timeout scenarios. I want to verify if this is expected behavior according to the official docs or a bug.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "26205c1442ee4d17", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:09abcf31a092", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98a46476-077e-499e-8b00-ccfd29908f00"}}
{"id": "9ff1dc1cd5a8abbe", "prompt": "I need to verify the pre-commit hooks. Read `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and tell me what version of ruff is being used. Then check `src/requests/__init__.py` to see if it's compatible with the current ruff version specified. Also, does tox.ini reference the same pre-commit configuration or run linting separately?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If ruff is out of date compared to the latest stable release in the repo's recent commits, suggest an update."}, {"prompt": "Check if the pre-commit config has any stages that don't match the hooks defined."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9ff1dc1cd5a8abbe", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "requests:8af9a9543686", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1cc38c76-ee97-4a5a-a59e-ab5c2c98fbb4"}}
{"id": "459d91f2c64696cd", "prompt": "I'm setting up a CI pipeline for the requests library and need to add a secret scanning step. Can you look at the current `.gitignore` and `.coveragerc` to ensure we aren't accidentally committing sensitive files? Also, scan `src/requests/` for any hardcoded credentials, API keys, or tokens that might have slipped in.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, thanks for checking. Now please add a `.gitleaks.toml` or configure `detect-secrets` in the `pyproject.toml` section to run this in CI."}, {"prompt": "Can you also check the `tests/` directory for any test fixtures that might contain real credentials that need to be rotated?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "459d91f2c64696cd", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:25225bb49fc2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1f9a5b5-cca2-457f-a54f-4e1afbb610bc"}}
{"id": "eea201684dcdab7a", "prompt": "The CI pipeline is failing on the pre-commit hook. Can you run `pre-commit run --all-files` and tell me which files are triggering errors? It seems to be a formatting issue with ruff.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eea201684dcdab7a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:9a630d7b5ec4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8e6673e-45df-41bf-8a91-99964790d469"}}
{"id": "5af9096002d58d85", "prompt": "在 `src/requests/exceptions.py` 中添加一个名为 `ConnectionTimeoutError` 的新异常类，继承自 `RequestException`。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "帮我给这个新异常写一个简单的单元测试，放在 `tests/test_requests.py` 里。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5af9096002d58d85", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:7e43496dfd27", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f49c8735-30e6-4df3-a202-d9faea7e1612"}}
{"id": "5ad66cace0063550", "prompt": "I want to see what happens if we bump the version of our core dependencies. Specifically, check the compatibility of our current implementation in src/requests/adapters.py with the latest version of urllib3 if we were to upgrade it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Try to identify any specific functions in src/requests/adapters.py that interact directly with urllib3 internals."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ad66cace0063550", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:6c031ad14a43", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "349e3df1-2c07-434e-9a84-5952e78fc471"}}
{"id": "6a1b3a1bcc8c8c7a", "prompt": "I'm seeing some flaky tests in the CI. Please run the tests in `tests/test_adapters.py` and `tests/test_lowlevel.py` multiple times to see if we can reproduce the failures. If they fail, check `src/requests/adapters.py` for potential race conditions in connection pooling.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6a1b3a1bcc8c8c7a", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "requests:42bcb2064d82", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18144a64-129f-4004-b043-bcb8d4462512"}}
{"id": "a93f1c5805d8ed20", "prompt": "Find all usages of `requests.exceptions.ConnectionError` throughout the src folder. I want to make sure we're not swallowing it incorrectly.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, thanks. Now can you check `src/requests/adapters.py` to see exactly where that exception is raised?"}, {"prompt": "Is there any place in `src/requests/sessions.py` that catches this exception?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a93f1c5805d8ed20", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:9f67ca42820d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0023eb98-7611-4dd6-98e5-98edc033f325"}}
{"id": "212afa1e5a9acd1e", "prompt": "compare src/requests/api.py between the current state and commit 6f205ff to see what changed in the file detection logic", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "212afa1e5a9acd1e", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:64c676a315ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74ba97f9-ea03-4b6c-8d59-786e343a01c4"}}
{"id": "fcb14115422e86d9", "prompt": "The error message in `src/requests/exceptions.py` for connection timeouts is a bit too cryptic. Can you make it more descriptive for the user?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fcb14115422e86d9", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "requests:47e891fc7348", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18da55d0-ddba-4d07-a204-362d4a215186"}}
{"id": "8815a30780893602", "prompt": "fix: Ruff is complaining about F401 (import unused) in `src/requests/packages.py`. The linter seems to think we aren't using the vendored libraries. Check the `__init__.py` to see how they are re-exported and update the code so the linter passes. Just run `ruff check src/requests/` after fixing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8815a30780893602", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:a4af59350419", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1c1faecd-8a68-4d37-b40c-a88418b4cf13"}}
{"id": "cd69a57408882f94", "prompt": "I'm getting a flaky test failure in `tests/test_requests.py` on the `test_keep_alive` test. The error is `ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused` when trying to hit the local test server. It happens randomly, not every time. How can I make the test server startup more robust or check if the port is actually ready before proceeding?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you look at the `testserver/server.py` file and suggest a way to ensure the socket is actually listening before returning from the start function?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cd69a57408882f94", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:1be44bdf759e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "151b1b08-5e88-4848-897c-154edfbdba25"}}
{"id": "2f8a4500d92861e3", "prompt": "Navigate to https://requests.readthedocs.io/ and check if the documentation badge in the README links to the correct readthedocs project. Also, click through to the 'Installation' page and verify the pip install command shown there matches what's in our README. If there are differences, highlight them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2f8a4500d92861e3", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:643a81b7ebde", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a85dece-eb66-49ef-aab8-ad103e2155e9"}}
{"id": "fcb718b4f9542320", "prompt": "Run `pytest tests/test_lowlevel.py -v` and paste the output here. It looks like the test `test_connection_error_returns_request_exception` is failing on my local machine with a timeout error, but it passes on CI.\n\nActually, wait, I see the error now:\n\n> FAILED tests/test_lowlevel.py::test_streaming_decode_error - KeyError: 'Content-Encoding'\n\nThis happens when the server doesn't send a Content-Encoding header but the client tries to decode gzip anyway. Look at `src/requests/models.py` in the `_decode_content` attribute handling. It seems we are assuming gzip if it was requested, even if the server didn't actually compress it. Fix the logic so it handles missing encoding headers gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fcb718b4f9542320", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:3cdfc5313a44", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8085661-0fa6-463d-b472-f8e02380cfea"}}
{"id": "b240c15cbd1dd968", "prompt": "I'm looking at `src/requests/models.py`. How does the `Response` object handle the `json()` method call? Specifically, what happens if the response body isn't valid JSON?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b240c15cbd1dd968", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "requests:2f3da3a592da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00be25f0-2f82-4ccc-bbfe-94deba714a91"}}
{"id": "d5cc45b44042cc93", "prompt": "Security review: `src/requests/auth.py`. I want to ensure that the Basic and Digest authentication handlers are not susceptible to credential leakage via logging or error messages. Check `HTTPBasicAuth` and `HTTPDigestAuth`. Also, scan the entire `src/` directory for any `print` statements or `logging` calls that might output headers or auth credentials.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find any logging that outputs headers, please sanitize them or remove them."}, {"prompt": "Check `src/requests/utils.py` for any `__repr__` methods on Request/Response objects that might leak sensitive data."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5cc45b44042cc93", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "requests:49ef31efc5a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c4c308c-08e6-46fe-939e-1a940c2d52ec"}}
{"id": "87bc35a30ba3bbce", "prompt": "Fix the typing issues in `src/requests/exceptions.py`. Mypy is complaining that `HTTPError` does not have the correct signature for `__init__` compared to its parent `RequestException`. Specifically, the `response` argument is typed as `Optional` but is actually required in the concrete implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "87bc35a30ba3bbce", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:1e7bb428605d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ec0c28d-74f3-4e7b-b6ef-ea948d26ea4a"}}
{"id": "8bd11b4b23bc2641", "prompt": "Y a-t-il eu une récente vulnérabilité CVE sur la bibliothèque Requests (psf/requests) ces 30 derniers jours ? Je veux m'assurer qu'on est à jour avant de merge.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8bd11b4b23bc2641", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "requests:ca4d47202993", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "17dbc301-3008-47f5-8497-2e261f4f3dc6"}}
{"id": "d0c23a0ac6a15f38", "prompt": "I need to stream a large file download using Requests. How do I iterate over chunks efficiently without loading the whole thing into memory? Also, when should I use `stream=True` versus just using `.content`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d0c23a0ac6a15f38", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "requests:6f2b2c539f69", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f12d02f0-c26d-460b-9a43-b9cf6567e5ee"}}
{"id": "f8e550bf3efefa95", "prompt": "Revert the commit `6f66281` (the one that added hasattr checks). It's causing issues with our current type checker setup.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f8e550bf3efefa95", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "requests:40bedf57d420", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "768315a4-b63b-4e72-8d84-149b686881d4"}}
{"id": "58e33b0b04c2a4f3", "prompt": "Incmente le numéro de version dans `src/requests/__version__.py` de 2.31.0 à 2.32.0. Mets aussi à jour la version dans `pyproject.toml` si elle y est spécifiée.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "58e33b0b04c2a4f3", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "requests:e0bf4cd3ef2a", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0157f3fc-a17d-48a5-b244-27cdabee90d3"}}
{"id": "35b5691ccbec0cbd", "prompt": "Hey, `requests.sessions.merge_setting` is dropping custom session attributes that aren't dicts or lists. If I do `session.custom_attr = 'value'` and then call `merge_setting('custom_attr', 'new_value')`, it silently ignores the new value. Is this intended? It's causing state loss in my middleware pipeline.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "35b5691ccbec0cbd", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "requests:d1ec36473dd1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1389ea2-44a1-4fa0-bd11-2f030fbb00ae"}}
{"id": "2562bed804bf7bd3", "prompt": "list all branches in this repo", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2562bed804bf7bd3", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "requests:cda458b9a155", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f4fb4d8-f508-452a-8b54-cf648d8bf6c2"}}
{"id": "e8e6e585eea70a9c", "prompt": "We should probably move towards using a more modern dependency management approach. Can you assess if we should migrate from setup.py to a fully PEP 621 compliant pyproject.toml setup?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e8e6e585eea70a9c", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "requests:7633871aeda1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec14784f-70d5-4194-803e-040a9aab7895"}}
{"id": "2736b55bc77dcc83", "prompt": "Hey, I noticed some recent commits bumping `ruff-pre-commit`. I'm seeing linting errors locally that don't match the CI results. Can you check the official `ruff` documentation for version 0.4.x to see if there are any breaking changes in auto-fix rules between 0.3.x and 0.4.x that might explain why our pre-commit hook is failing differently than expected? I specifically need to know about changes to the `E501` (line too long) handling.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks. If I pin the version in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, what should I use? I want to avoid these drift issues."}, {"prompt": "Actually, could you also check if `ruff` has a migration guide for moving from 0.2 to 0.4? I want to make sure we're not missing other deprecated rules."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2736b55bc77dcc83", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "requests:4a9a0408f059", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "274a8e53-9fbc-4780-a2f7-89e97fa7f7c2"}}
{"id": "8519afde196dc883", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug a memory leak in long-running sessions. Can you run the test suite but only execute `tests/test_requests.py::TestRequests::test_session_persistent_headers`? I need to see if the session object is being cleaned up correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8519afde196dc883", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "requests:1407bca822e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd163d24-b9c6-4560-8adf-ebd3d9c2aeb4"}}
{"id": "4f47a1cd0b2ffe12", "prompt": "Hey, I need to implement proxy support for a proxy that isn't in the standard list. I looked at `adapters.py` and saw `HTTPAdapter` and `SOCKSProxyAdapter`. Can you tell me where the proxy environment variables (like `HTTPS_PROXY`) are actually read from `os.environ` and converted into the `proxies` dictionary used by `Session`? I want to patch the lookup logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4f47a1cd0b2ffe12", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "requests:e21b2e734ff5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f60c8457-8ddd-4849-92dc-7f270b54c609"}}
{"id": "17ace1afaf0a0756", "prompt": "I'm having trouble debugging the session cookie persistence. Open an interactive terminal for me so I can inspect the objects in `src/requests/sessions.py` manually.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "17ace1afaf0a0756", "repo": "requests", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "requests:7caaa6280f39", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "requests-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b93ab30-ecc8-4f56-8b24-4b0db4a47359"}}
{"id": "7ba9d746484309f7", "prompt": "find all usages of `is_hidden` in the ignore crate. I'm refactoring `pathutil` and want to make sure I don't break the hidden file skipping logic.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What about in the main `crates/core` module? Does it call it directly?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ba9d746484309f7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:80a46364e725", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "388cb58f-12c3-4fd1-9c36-9b01dca54656"}}
{"id": "b1fb3214a6fa5037", "prompt": "We're seeing a slight performance regression in the `benchsuite` runs for the `archlinux-frink` build. It looks like `globset` might be involved. Can you check the current version and see if upgrading `crates/globset` helps? I don't want to just bump versions randomly though, so please check the changelog or recent commits first.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If it looks safe, go ahead and bump the version in `Cargo.toml`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b1fb3214a6fa5037", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:2ba6aa210f98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66eac0fe-2117-4444-890d-ef81abbd3985"}}
{"id": "91846c89344e5380", "prompt": "I'm getting a compile error when building ripgrep with the `unstable-index` feature enabled on the latest master (`d99ac34`).\n\n```\nerror[E0432]: unresolved import `crate::index::Index`\n --> crates/core/main.rs:12:5\n  |\n12 | use crate::index::Index;\n  |\n  = note: expected type `()`\n             found struct `Index`\n```\n\nThis is happening in `crates/core/main.rs`. It seems like the `index` module is conditionally compiled but the imports aren't matching up. Can you fix the conditional compilation attributes in `main.rs` and `crates/index/src/lib.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "91846c89344e5380", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:eace877026d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6892d13-75f9-4eb5-bc78-6e0c82036b93"}}
{"id": "d129fa3002f05d36", "prompt": "How does the pattern matching work in `crates/regex/src/matcher.rs`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d129fa3002f05d36", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:644ca5dbee56", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f03649ce-55f9-4b96-8055-cb7739a4a48e"}}
{"id": "513e15b91fa0ec1d", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the codebase. I want to know if there's anything blocking a release or just minor cleanup tasks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "513e15b91fa0ec1d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e5c0801fcf99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8563cad-f961-44b1-b181-09e0d2414f2a"}}
{"id": "ba138a64cb56a902", "prompt": "We're seeing some odd behavior with `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` on Windows. Can you audit the path handling logic there? I suspect we might have a path traversal vulnerability or an off-by-one error when joining ignore patterns with the base directory. Specifically look at `ignore_path` and how it interacts with `PathBuf`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba138a64cb56a902", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b0fbcb2f3a3a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "36cbda22-0c40-4f2d-9dcb-9eae8fed8170"}}
{"id": "005d963f47b6669e", "prompt": "gitignore の除外ルールが適用されるロジック、`crates/ignore` 配列のどちらで実装されてるか探して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "関連するテストファイルも列挙してほしい。"}, {"prompt": "テストの中身で、BOM をスキップするケースがあるか？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "005d963f47b6669e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f0bd1f198b1d", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9154ffb0-1556-4fb4-bc84-93562ecd3342"}}
{"id": "eb01ae1f9c375ac8", "prompt": "I'm trying to update our `pcre2` dependency in `Cargo.toml`. The latest release on crates.io is 11.00.0 but our lockfile has 10.40.0.\n\nDoes the PCRE2 C library have any breaking ABI changes between 10.x and 11.x that I need to be aware of before upgrading the `pcre2-sys` bindings? I specifically need to know if `pcre2_compile` signature changed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eb01ae1f9c375ac8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:27fe48e71eec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be95dc2f-2120-408b-8af6-88168415c800"}}
{"id": "ce1d5623dc25c07b", "prompt": "I'm getting a warning about `serde_impl.rs` in `crates/globset`. The `serde` documentation says `#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)]` is preferred over manual impls. Can you check if our manual implementation is necessary for `globset` and if we can switch to derive macros?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ce1d5623dc25c07b", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:949f6dbd3e4b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc60b7c1-b44b-4581-99c6-c0bbb2ccfcb5"}}
{"id": "8fc8e3671fd0c49d", "prompt": "Ripgrep automatically skips binary files. How can I override this behavior for a specific command line invocation? I know `-uuu` disables all filtering, so what is the specific flag for just re-enabling binary file content?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8fc8e3671fd0c49d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f39b7a7cf296", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9e5168be-3643-4635-a55b-b54f9a509488"}}
{"id": "170a3c7e7e1f807a", "prompt": "Show me how `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` handles command line arguments.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "170a3c7e7e1f807a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:954e3ab18272", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a6022aa-e39a-4185-bf8d-b6f392a10595"}}
{"id": "fe5dc19b46c112be", "prompt": "The indexing feature seems a bit fragmented. I need you to unify the configuration between `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` and the new `crates/index` module. Ensure that when indexing is enabled, the corresponding flags are correctly set or disabled as per the recent commit `2ed0c00`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fe5dc19b46c112be", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:fce1c8316769", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e598580e-e6ff-409b-9515-bf7be707335c"}}
{"id": "869b55e2f3b89f20", "prompt": "I want to add a dependency on `anyhow` to `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` for better error handling. Is it already a transitive dependency? If not, add it to `Cargo.toml` and update the `lib.rs` to use `anyhow::Result` instead of our current `Box<dyn Error>` where appropriate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "869b55e2f3b89f20", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:2c6a70cbe5eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6f2a8782-4f23-41eb-904e-57087b2d439e"}}
{"id": "2e0e13c2ced9a6a3", "prompt": "Kannst du mal in `crates/index/src/index.rs` reinschauen? Ich habe das Gefühl, dass das Indexing bei sehr großen Repos (wie dem Linux-Kernel) nicht skaliert. Wie wird die `index` Struktur aktuell aufgebaut? Gibt es da Bottlenecks beim Schreiben?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Alles klar. Dann schau bitte auch in `crates/core/index/enabled.rs`, wie dort auf die Index-Struktur zugegriffen wird. Passt das zusammen?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2e0e13c2ced9a6a3", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:288c43249f60", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "537f5e2c-76f8-4420-80b3-f7f1b883ba64"}}
{"id": "4189140258bbda5b", "prompt": "Can you find the migration guide for `globset` v0.4.0? I see we're using it in `crates/ignore` and `crates/globset`, and there's a mention of a breaking change in the changelog regarding how `GlobSet` is constructed, but I can't find the detailed migration notes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4189140258bbda5b", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0bd9811b8bd7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "025d0b7e-a57d-4561-9c7f-dc6180addb67"}}
{"id": "7a0f090cdf410353", "prompt": "Add `target/` to `.gitignore`. It looks like it's not there and I keep accidentally staging binary artifacts.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7a0f090cdf410353", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:76cc87dc4625", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d63e3e0-64a0-46ad-a9c0-709305df36e1"}}
{"id": "98f22a2c691b4d8f", "prompt": "Check the status page for ripgrep (https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/issues) to see if there are any recent high-priority bugs or PRs opened in the last 24 hours. I want to know if there's a specific CVE or security issue that just came up that I need to address before merging my patch in `crates/core/main.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "98f22a2c691b4d8f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1844f6996c84", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f50774d6-515d-4cc7-95b1-bfd052ca9460"}}
{"id": "1b1e48cbd92a57f8", "prompt": "I need to add a `verbose` boolean parameter to the `Searcher::new` function in `crates/searcher/src/searcher/core.rs`. Please update the signature and any immediate callers in that crate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b1e48cbd92a57f8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:fdd1230f6846", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4343d58a-6e6a-4b31-91f7-3b77f40f8b61"}}
{"id": "5fe9f1ae8e669e42", "prompt": "エラーメッセージ 'failed to read' が出力される箇所を grep してほしい。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5fe9f1ae8e669e42", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1c6b2d1dc8bb", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b6a6be0c-31cd-4046-b2cb-ad4549c29a6e"}}
{"id": "657767a86ba14325", "prompt": "Hey, ich arbeite gerade an der CI-Pipeline und brauche die SHA256-Hashes für die aktuellen Release-Archive. Kannst du mir bitte die `ci/sha256-releases` Datei durchgehen und auflisten, welche Hashes dort für die Plattformen linux-amd64, darwin-amd64 und windows-amd64 hinterlegt sind? Bitte auch den entsprechenden git Tag dazu notieren.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "657767a86ba14325", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b3ae0e2313da", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af658bea-1f97-4d83-9c37-d555c1cd5deb"}}
{"id": "184b33fe9b1d2cd7", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with how hidden files are handled in certain shells. Can you: \n- Check `crates/core/flags/complete/` for all shell types (fish, powershell, zsh) and ensure the completion logic is consistent.\n- Cross-reference `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` with `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` to ensure the 'skip hidden' logic is applying correctly when flags are passed.\n- Check `crates/cli/src/hostname.rs` to see if it's affecting any path resolution.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "184b33fe9b1d2cd7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:3bab55a29844", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "17c192f8-8b1f-472a-b394-7cca7676ffbe"}}
{"id": "45ad997e6bb82dcb", "prompt": "Audit the dependencies for the `grep-index` crate. I see it was added in commit d57de83. Are there any recent security advisories for the crates it pulls in, specifically `byteorder` or `memmap2`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "45ad997e6bb82dcb", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c66945b66c9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d1b2b4e-e327-4177-950e-fccbfbf54746"}}
{"id": "bf4b2269c2eff2df", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand why `rg --debug` sometimes prints \"regex match cache size\" but other times it doesn't. Can you find the official documentation or source comments for the `regex` crate's `RegexBuilder` regarding the compile-time cache? Specifically, I want to know if setting `size_limit` affects the static cache generation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf4b2269c2eff2df", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0b1805be5909", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "865cca85-da36-4a92-9f5d-f5b866ea2740"}}
{"id": "585181bc9f98f5d7", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior in the searcher. Can you find any running processes related to `ripgrep` or `rg` and stop them? I think a zombie process is holding onto a file descriptor.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "585181bc9f98f5d7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f53d6f4fba94", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fef3e4fa-60a1-4d82-8fbc-addcec2bb399"}}
{"id": "a5b1f9f444022251", "prompt": "Hey, can you check the latest published version of `pcre2-sys` on crates.io? We're currently pinning it in `Cargo.toml` and I want to see if there's a newer minor version available that might fix some edge case with regex compilation errors.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ah, version 11.00302000 is a pre-release. I meant stable."}, {"prompt": "Okay, stable is 11.00201000. I'll check if our code breaks on that specific version before upgrading."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a5b1f9f444022251", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:64ad3e6b29be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c7b4155-299c-4e45-985b-bb0d4a184070"}}
{"id": "90511b07dd642b54", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how ripgrep decides whether to skip a file. Can you walk me through the logic in `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` handle the directory traversal logic?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "90511b07dd642b54", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:00b4871d3bec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8df59355-4ce7-4d7a-a405-768eb461f0fa"}}
{"id": "484b207318848459", "prompt": "Run `cargo clean` and then rebuild to make sure everything compiles from scratch. I suspect some artifacts might be leftover from a previous feature flag change.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "484b207318848459", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:55e02ed919dc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "624dd7b8-451f-4ade-a2b2-9f1cad2a08cf"}}
{"id": "29f721e1293dc9ae", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue where `rg` is crashing on macOS with M1 chips when using PCRE2. I need to know if there's a known CVE or issue with the `pcre2-sys` dependency versions we are currently pinning. Can you search the rustsec advisory database or the pcre2 crate repo for any recent security advisories affecting versions 1.0.10 or lower?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "29f721e1293dc9ae", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:d01e5430fa05", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee07fa00-4b73-42f6-818f-d59ab8a39b74"}}
{"id": "2edb4c8e64eaa0cf", "prompt": "What was the difference in the core crate between commit 8372866 and d57de83?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2edb4c8e64eaa0cf", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0136dc10ffaf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23cea9b8-c778-4f17-9af7-5561b248182f"}}
{"id": "e75ad2820eca135a", "prompt": "What does `cargo-binstall` recommend for updating `rg` in homebrew formulae? I'm looking at `pkg/brew/ripgrep-bin.rb`. The current script seems to hardcode the checksum. Is there a better way to handle this according to the Homebrew docs or the latest release process in `RELEASE-CHECKLIST.md`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the homebrew formula to use this new method."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e75ad2820eca135a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1c66de9496a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4eebdc2a-51da-4370-a0a8-62705e1ecf5d"}}
{"id": "f1ddf8f6c62fb192", "prompt": "I need to update the `ignore` crate in Cargo.lock. Can you check what the latest version is and see if there are any breaking changes in `crates/ignore/src/lib.rs` or `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` that we need to handle?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f1ddf8f6c62fb192", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:4362bee1bc70", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b43353d-579c-47bb-b4e1-365901ad586d"}}
{"id": "f18f1971067518de", "prompt": "I see references to `pcre2` and `regex` crates. Ripgrep uses `regex` by default. What is the use case for the `pcre2` feature? Are there specific regex constructs that are only supported when compiling with PCRE2?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f18f1971067518de", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:52c989b96dd1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63f33334-7821-427a-9ba1-d822ecdb48b3"}}
{"id": "52496076c065ad81", "prompt": "We recently switched from `regex-syntax` to a local matcher in `crates/matcher`. Can you audit `crates/regex/src/matcher.rs` and `crates/matcher/src/lib.rs` to ensure we're not pulling in the full `regex` crate unnecessarily? If so, remove it from `Cargo.toml` and clean up any unused imports.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "52496076c065ad81", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:8883ce748db8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f737ead4-719a-418e-9e95-8726791ce307"}}
{"id": "51cc1e0633f3462b", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how ripgrep handles `.gitignore` rules. Does it stop at the first matching ignore pattern it finds in a parent directory, or does it continue searching for more specific patterns in subdirectories? Also, how does the 'hidden file' detection work—is it purely filesystem-based or does it respect dotfiles in a specific way?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "51cc1e0633f3462b", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:36ae86fea225", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d33e3d9f-c8bd-43a9-b894-fca578cb540a"}}
{"id": "78ad11116ca4faa8", "prompt": "I need to test the CLI with some dummy credentials. Generate a mock JWT token for local testing purposes. Just something that looks realistic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "78ad11116ca4faa8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:81c39a673a26", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b7efbe5d-4bce-47b9-a19a-b841657916a9"}}
{"id": "ffd3e05ed4318de4", "prompt": "The current README is a bit sparse on how the new indexing feature works. Can you draft a 'New Feature' section explaining the `unstable-index` feature and how users can enable it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ffd3e05ed4318de4", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e915b1448cf2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bfdd815-a0db-4d2f-b1cf-aca7062bb03c"}}
{"id": "52307f42e536c6e0", "prompt": "The `ignore` crate got bumped in `Cargo.toml`. Update the `crates/ignore/` directory to match the new version and update the lockfile. Also, check `crates/globset` as it seems to have a related change in the commit log.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "52307f42e536c6e0", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:367d06c3ec3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e80800c-646b-4214-8601-2d78ed4cf62b"}}
{"id": "aa1a02c6eabed6fc", "prompt": "I got a weird panic in production: 'index out of bounds'. I don't have a stack trace but it happens during the indexing phase. Can you find which file in `crates/index/src/` performs boundary checks? I need to add some logging around those bounds.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aa1a02c6eabed6fc", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:6b99d4a2967b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f731dcd-dda2-4510-bbf8-2685be95f935"}}
{"id": "3aac4c97d666c549", "prompt": "I'm looking at `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` and I see we're using the `ignore` crate to handle .gitignore parsing. The docs for `ignore` are a bit sparse on how exactly the `globset` crate integrates with the `ignore::types::Types` structure. Could you find the official docs for the `ignore` crate's `Types` builder to see if there are any caveats about how it handles globset compilation that I should be aware of?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3aac4c97d666c549", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:4e9c600f27d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c50b79ec-1955-412e-b0f3-cee01f74b1f2"}}
{"id": "edf74bfe553dc4df", "prompt": "Can you run the benchmark suite in `benchsuite/runs/2022-12-16-archlinux-duff/` for me? I want to compare the current `master` performance against that baseline. Just run the `raw.csv` generator again with the current build.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "edf74bfe553dc4df", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:d992e3253f1b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6190a092-c830-45e3-a754-9af1a05012af"}}
{"id": "4895d6cad15302f2", "prompt": "I'm comparing ripgrep against Silver Searcher (ag). The README shows ripgrep is significantly faster on the Linux kernel search. Is that speedup primarily due to SIMD instructions or better parallelism in `crates/searcher`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4895d6cad15302f2", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:926215cd2358", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8bbc4b8f-a902-4869-9d4d-15b296544f5e"}}
{"id": "f6a28bd672bf084b", "prompt": "Scanning the repo for hardcoded secrets or API keys. I suspect we might have some credentials in the benchmark suite configs or the CI scripts from previous runs. Please check `benchsuite/` and `ci/`. Also check `crates/core/flags/config.rs` to make sure we aren't accidentally logging sensitive config values.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find anything, just redact it in the output and tell me where it is."}, {"prompt": "Check if any `.env` files are being tracked."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6a28bd672bf084b", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:cc61256de846", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b4b25b4-e4ac-4091-acca-f895285daf82"}}
{"id": "8e60254630493b5e", "prompt": "I'm looking at `crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs`. How does the memory mapping implementation work here for searching files?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8e60254630493b5e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:6ca6c78e5c99", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe94b00d-6544-4378-b145-b9fc02787093"}}
{"id": "c6b5c3397d73df62", "prompt": "The `--json` output in `crates/printer/src/jsont.rs` is missing the file path for matches inside binary files when I use `-a`. When I search a binary file with `rg -a --json 'pattern'`, all matches show up but `path` is empty. It should at least print the filename like it does for text files. Can you patch `jsont.rs` and `crates/printer/src/util.rs` to ensure binary matches also include the file path?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c6b5c3397d73df62", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:dd6f1fb09186", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec5d419c-781d-42ef-9eff-a9b58c1606ee"}}
{"id": "1b8fbf6200e23dbe", "prompt": "I found a CVE mentioning regex ReDoS. Can you check if our regex matching in `crates/regex/src/matcher.rs` is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking? Specifically look at patterns involving nested quantifiers or complex alternations. We need to know if user-supplied patterns can hang the process.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1b8fbf6200e23dbe", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:23d7747fa7a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a42e002a-2398-4df1-a1d0-2a61d0ff4523"}}
{"id": "f3676c4509e1b071", "prompt": "帮我对比一下当前的 `main` 分支和 `3fce3b5` 这个 commit 之间的差异，重点看下 `crates/` 目录下的变化。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f3676c4509e1b071", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:839152e24c96", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e8b496f5-7103-4779-a997-320bfc09161f"}}
{"id": "d5fffabcb43afa6b", "prompt": "Update GUIDE.md to include a section on how to configure ripgrep using the configuration file, as mentioned in the README.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Include a small example of a configuration block for skipping specific directory patterns."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d5fffabcb43afa6b", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:87c22f58f5bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11325800-7062-4dec-b131-eb679f09afea"}}
{"id": "239e146fd60cd357", "prompt": "We need to improve our documentation and CI reliability. Please:\n- Update `GUIDE.md` to include the new `unstable-index` feature details.\n- Add a new test case in `tests/feature.rs` that specifically exercises the new indexing scaffolding added in the `index` crate.\n- Review `ci/utils.sh` to ensure it's correctly handling the new build provenance attestation steps mentioned in recent commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "239e146fd60cd357", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:6914d6b07c73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "629dc591-c2de-43a6-a381-626f0e548adf"}}
{"id": "ea3b2337d9d956b7", "prompt": "Can you add a 'Troubleshooting' section to the FAQ.md specifically addressing issues with `.gitignore` files not being respected in certain environments?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ea3b2337d9d956b7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:5b72e209acf0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1840a64-2a5a-446a-99b4-bce82e7215d0"}}
{"id": "0a6af0c91e8484c7", "prompt": "compare tag v13.0.0 with the current HEAD", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0a6af0c91e8484c7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:37a1522c134f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42d3801e-c745-41d3-80df-d14d08941b84"}}
{"id": "8c41539df18d571c", "prompt": "show me the diff for commit 020687a", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8c41539df18d571c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:77518b33000b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ce73f745-ef88-4bd9-b679-8230b688d623"}}
{"id": "bc454159244bef90", "prompt": "I noticed `crates/core/flags/defs.rs` exports a lot of structs. I'm confused about the distinction between `hiargs` and `lowargs`. Why are the argument definitions split into high-level and low-level structures? Is this related to the parsing pipeline or just logical separation?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What is the role of `parse.rs` in this context?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc454159244bef90", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c91b8f8000cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "142b77f3-8ad6-47a9-bc8b-bdfa9e2de7e2"}}
{"id": "bea799ee496ceded", "prompt": "Ich habe ein paar unfertige Änderungen in den `crates/ignore/`-Dateien. Kannst du diese erst einmal stashen, damit mein Arbeitsverzeichnis sauber ist?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Gut, jetzt kannst du die Änderungen wieder aus dem Stash holen und sie in logische Commits aufteilen, anstatt alles in einen einzigen großen Block zu werfen."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bea799ee496ceded", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0356636c0ced", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0cbc22b-311e-4d64-9ec6-d6e437dd65ca"}}
{"id": "8ff4a446c7db1c11", "prompt": "I'm getting weird behavior with the gitignore parser. Can you check if `crates/ignore/tests/gitignore_skip_bom.rs` is actually running? It looks like it might be ignored or not compiled correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8ff4a446c7db1c11", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0a339c241225", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "095f960b-a4da-40f2-96f3-b9f08384275d"}}
{"id": "cbb8308854de0e5f", "prompt": "The incremental index check in `crates/ignore/src/incremental.rs` seems to be causing a deadlock when `visitor` panics. I see commit 0d57de4 mentions \"ignore: fix deadlock when visitor panics\". Can you look at the current state of that file? I'm getting panics during parallel searches and it feels like the mutex isn't being released properly in the catch block. Fix it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cbb8308854de0e5f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b9a7f62c3b69", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c03c7648-f2d9-4244-8c94-2dbcfa60908b"}}
{"id": "2ce4f9719c3a6ef9", "prompt": "The last commit `3fce3b5` was a mistake. Can you revert it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2ce4f9719c3a6ef9", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:98bde703b047", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f34e0fb4-291d-4f5b-93e2-d8d6641fdf0b"}}
{"id": "f7cedb594de2441c", "prompt": "I see `crates/globset/src/glob.rs` and `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`. How do they interact? Specifically, I want to know where a pattern from a .gitignore file gets converted into a Glob for matching.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f7cedb594de2441c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:8741b762a7e5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "013e67b6-bc57-4464-9841-fae3f310741b"}}
{"id": "9f8527b3dcde2ceb", "prompt": "In `crates/core/messages.rs`, add a new error message for when a search pattern is invalid, and update the error type in `crates/regex/src/error.rs` to include it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9f8527b3dcde2ceb", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c0169f8df131", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b6bc450-0369-48cc-852e-0206a4b5c100"}}
{"id": "e42c42aed138c2d6", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/binary.rs` that checks if the tool correctly handles empty input via stdin.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e42c42aed138c2d6", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ea56785ba447", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "77695129-e549-455f-bc15-c490f2c09168"}}
{"id": "fb8430a98aec765c", "prompt": "crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs:78 - I'm seeing a panic in `Gitignore::new` when the path has a trailing slash on macOS. It looks like we're not canonicalizing the prefix correctly before appending patterns. Can you reproduce and fix this edge case?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add a regression test for this in `tests/gitignore_matched_path_or_any_parents_tests.gitignore`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb8430a98aec765c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:70a31a07f315", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3825a71a-d4f1-4657-9f03-ab2b4fb6075f"}}
{"id": "24815d97b74afce2", "prompt": "Explain the purpose of `crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "24815d97b74afce2", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:903429044de4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47eb0ed1-a434-43fb-81b9-b57c5dc51696"}}
{"id": "fb6bed5a4a090e44", "prompt": "check git blame on crates/core/main.rs:45", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb6bed5a4a090e44", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:91d4bd34b092", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f23568a8-c7a5-4f0b-ad77-7ea337ad8fff"}}
{"id": "85277f22aab15726", "prompt": "Hey, I noticed that `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` is rejecting valid patterns with special characters in Windows paths. specifically backslashes. Since we're using PCRE2 via `crates/pcre2/src/matcher.rs`, backslashes should be escaped or handled correctly. Can you ensure that path separators are handled gracefully in the regex input regardless of OS?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "85277f22aab15726", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:18818a48b816", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54630126-eea8-47f2-af09-a2763abb1dc0"}}
{"id": "fd4558a0e7ecd292", "prompt": "Refactor the error handling in `crates/core/main.rs`.\n\nCurrently, `main()` does a lot of `.unwrap_or_else` chains for setup errors. I'd like to extract the initialization logic (loading config, setting up the walker, preparing regexes) into a dedicated `fn setup()` function that returns a `Result<SearchSession, Error>`.\n\nPlease look at `crates/core/main.rs` and `crates/core/search.rs`. Move the bulk of the logic from `main` into the setup phase, and keep `main` as a thin entry point that calls `setup()` and then `run_search()`.\n\nDon't change any external CLI behavior or help text. Just clean up the flow.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fd4558a0e7ecd292", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c4a02ce493c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9fc74b0f-5aa7-42ee-bb99-f5119014acbd"}}
{"id": "ee4215740ec8f3ed", "prompt": "check the recent commits. The last few were about `ignore` and `index`. Specifically, commit `0d57de3` mentions a fix for a deadlock in the ignore visitor. Can you show me the code in `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` around that change? I want to review the lock logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ee4215740ec8f3ed", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a6689000b295", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dea7854e-310a-4f82-85f6-61b910922e09"}}
{"id": "98c4e7a0dd45c89d", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest changes. Can you run `cargo clippy` and fix all the `clippy::all` warnings? I want a clean build before I push.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did it find any issues?"}, {"prompt": "Run `cargo test` next to make sure we didn't break anything."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "98c4e7a0dd45c89d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0c7425f9051e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1bc94d98-5383-4f41-84f9-63986c900f42"}}
{"id": "ec697d6244986264", "prompt": "Delete the `benchsuite/runs/2016-09-17-ubuntu1604-ec2/README.SETUP` file. It's outdated and cluttering the repo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ec697d6244986264", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f39277db8afe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc19bf71-6e0d-4cd1-9423-9dab3cafd69f"}}
{"id": "0e2dd55e5af240a8", "prompt": "In `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`, the `is_hidden` function logic seems off when dealing with symlinks. On my Linux box (Arch), ripgrep is ignoring hidden files inside a directory that is itself a symlink to a hidden directory. Specifically, `rg foo ./real_dir/link_to_dir/` isn't searching files inside `link_to_dir` if the symlink target is hidden. Is this intentional behavior or a bug? The docs say it respects gitignore rules, but I'm not sure if symlinked hidden dirs are handled correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0e2dd55e5af240a8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:9334a9a70be6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "365f77df-8bef-4bdf-bf3b-ca7fe73d5dc5"}}
{"id": "a40ad2fd5ebed53d", "prompt": "The CI is getting slow and we have some flaky issues. Please: \n1. Review `ci/utils.sh` to see if we can cache more artifacts.\n2. Run the tests in `tests/index/` and `tests/json.rs` to see if they have any intermittent failures.\n3. Investigate `crates/globset/benches/bench.rs` to see if the benchmark results can be made more stable.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a40ad2fd5ebed53d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:bd8d9f00aa0e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "970bd93a-830e-4db6-ba40-8b3eb4f89ed3"}}
{"id": "5fc645eb98ede389", "prompt": "Hallo, ich muss eine kurze Analyse für das Onboarding machen. Kannst du mir bitte eine Statistik aus der `Cargo.toml` im Root-Verzeichnis und sämtlichen `Cargo.toml`-Dateien in den `crates/`-Unterverzeichnissen erstellen?\n\n1. Gesamtanzahl der crates\n2. Durchschnittliche Anzahl der Abhängigkeiten pro crate\n3. Welche crate hat die meisten Abhängigkeiten?\n\nDanke!", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Super, danke. Kannst du diese Liste dann als JSON-Objekt ausgeben, damit ich es direkt in unsere Docs einfügen kann?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5fc645eb98ede389", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:5a303d52a2a7", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ecfcc870-df4c-4cc4-b501-251fa5d97fb3"}}
{"id": "2e5e93bf4b06bff8", "prompt": "Can you run `cargo fmt` and then `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings`? If there are any lint errors, please fix them. I want a clean build before the next release.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2e5e93bf4b06bff8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:cc50be3a929d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50d28830-9937-4454-a3e5-24f8da4db207"}}
{"id": "8bf53c21dba29215", "prompt": "In `crates/core/messages.rs`, change the error message from 'invalid pattern' to 'invalid regex pattern' to be more descriptive.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8bf53c21dba29215", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a283fd437c8c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9300e355-f0a1-456f-8e35-ac6f9135046c"}}
{"id": "bc49e61824a0daf8", "prompt": "fix: the fish completions are missing the `--json` flag output description. Check `crates/core/flags/complete/fish.rs` and patch it up.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Also check if the zsh one is missing it too."}, {"prompt": "Never mind, I saw it in the PR. Close this."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc49e61824a0daf8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b446bd27fdb6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dcc825d5-cf4a-4386-a134-d6c1e5e347fd"}}
{"id": "128e608da94bcc97", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/multiline.rs` that verifies searching for a pattern spanning across two lines using a newline character in the regex.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests to make sure it passes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "128e608da94bcc97", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c4710a039d3e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c359979a-08fb-4174-8ff5-9f3cba00c08a"}}
{"id": "c6b877b0c91ba10d", "prompt": "I'm getting errors when building with the `unstable-index` feature enabled. The compiler says:\n\n```\nerror: `flags::hiargs` is private\n   --> crates/core/flags/mod.rs:12:9\n    |\n12  | pub use hiargs::*;\n    |         ^^^^^^^ private module\n```\n\nI need to expose the high-level args struct for the indexing feature. Look at `crates/core/flags/hiargs.rs` and `crates/core/flags/mod.rs` and make the necessary visibility adjustments.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c6b877b0c91ba10d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e0329e7aa0c3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f936fe9-99cc-4435-8bc5-c8cf3470ebd2"}}
{"id": "48cf06788e9da2e5", "prompt": "Can you generate a temporary secret key for my local `.env` file? Any high-entropy string will do.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great. Now wait for the build to finish—I mean, just notify me when the `build.rs` execution seems to have completed."}, {"prompt": "Open an interactive terminal session so I can run the tests manually."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "48cf06788e9da2e5", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c81e5f1441e9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05e1f180-e307-4c4b-b2a8-b31d65625541"}}
{"id": "55ce0186f5d80729", "prompt": "In `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs`, how does the ignore logic handle symlinks? If I have a symlinked directory structure, will ripgrep follow those links during the recursive search?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can I configure `ripgrep` to always follow symlinks, or does it require a specific flag?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "55ce0186f5d80729", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f646bc66894e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "532b5905-702d-40a7-8631-7666fd79c4d3"}}
{"id": "e0722cdaa3516669", "prompt": "I think `target/` might not be ignored properly or we have some stray build artifacts. Run `git status` and check if `target/` is in `.gitignore`. If it is, please clean up any untracked files in the root directory that look like build outputs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e0722cdaa3516669", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:93d39a195e1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c2d42f32-8882-47bb-a023-5d576bd8f6f6"}}
{"id": "be02941782592102", "prompt": "I'm seeing different match counts between `rg 'pattern'` and `grep -r 'pattern'` on the same directory. Is ripgrep doing something with regex syntax that I'm not expecting, or is it the default ignore rules? The pattern is a simple regex with a quantifier like `a+`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "be02941782592102", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:5dfc6dbe002f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef086765-7322-49e1-bbd6-d05ad39b2b16"}}
{"id": "6b4f0f12ab1cb6d8", "prompt": "The user guide mentions shell completions. Can you check the latest output for `rg --complete fish` vs `rg --complete zsh` and paste the first 50 lines of the fish completion here? I need to compare it against the code in `crates/core/flags/complete/fish.rs` to see if the `--no-config` flag is actually exposed in the generated fish script.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b4f0f12ab1cb6d8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:854e76e6789d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a25a1c6-5b34-4df1-ad1b-096cd12129e8"}}
{"id": "82562283df4d9033", "prompt": "The git ignore handling feels slow on large projects. Can you trace where `ignore::gitignore::Gitignore::new` is called? I want to see if we are re-parsing `.gitignore` files for every directory traversal or if there's caching.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "82562283df4d9033", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:4148b5fd0b8a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f1449d2-6f02-4544-88fc-3f3207554aaa"}}
{"id": "06032fc1d6b495a1", "prompt": "Open a terminal for me. I need to manually run some `rg` commands against the `tests/data` directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06032fc1d6b495a1", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:243cef202973", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3aa4994-424c-40ce-8835-69b848241986"}}
{"id": "64a873faa2332b39", "prompt": "Look at `crates/printer/src/summary.rs`. How are the search statistics formatted for the final output?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "64a873faa2332b39", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:71c41c21ad8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5bfd9cfe-2d10-4947-aafe-a36b0c594c8c"}}
{"id": "c98b5c53d865edd5", "prompt": "Check if there are any uncommitted changes in the repository.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If there are, bundle them into a single commit with a good message summarizing the work."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c98b5c53d865edd5", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:3d4035e54257", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da0eb6fc-6164-4b7f-ba6a-2953eb79da87"}}
{"id": "93384397e7f739d9", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic in `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` for how it decides whether a path matches a gitignore rule?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "93384397e7f739d9", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:063eb82ae32d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a22ef5ae-4c3e-4b3b-be9d-1343cfe9df6c"}}
{"id": "70c86ff4bc408594", "prompt": "run `rg --help` to see the current version output. I'm trying to debug why the version string isn't picking up the git hash on this build.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, it's hardcoded. Check `crates/core/flags/doc/version.rs` to see where it's coming from."}, {"prompt": "Make sure `build.rs` is actually writing the version info correctly."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "70c86ff4bc408594", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f0edbcf5de74", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "61173a79-dfe6-495d-bb5e-ad35711f3f9c"}}
{"id": "07a1f8890d567973", "prompt": "我想看看 `crates/core/main.rs` 里关于搜索逻辑的实现，能不能帮我用 git blame 看一下第 50 行左右的代码是谁写的？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "那个 commit 的提交信息是什么？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "07a1f8890d567973", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b10b2caedd89", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66d41183-a2c4-47f9-90d1-ed73ed788623"}}
{"id": "bcc061b0a842d40e", "prompt": "where is the default ignore rule list defined? I need to understand why `.env` files aren't being ignored by default even though I have a global gitignore that excludes them. Check crates/ignore/src/default_types.rs and see where this gets loaded during the walk.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bcc061b0a842d40e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:147bae8a1405", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b431385f-85b2-4072-a28d-3b665e1903fb"}}
{"id": "06cc8df46f0e0f33", "prompt": "Check the current git status. What has changed in the last 24 hours? I need a quick summary of today's commits and uncommitted changes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the commit message for the most recent commit."}, {"prompt": "Are there any unpushed commits?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06cc8df46f0e0f33", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c9b1162fe2a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "284dab31-9fca-467f-b9b1-4874c00ef178"}}
{"id": "d15e48a04eefe877", "prompt": "Hey, can you spin up a local dev environment for me? I need a random 32-character hex string to use as a mock API token in my local config.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d15e48a04eefe877", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:5fa804ae6b73", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a29f15d-de37-430b-a5b9-2987a084f3b0"}}
{"id": "4d187a18312f8727", "prompt": "Review `crates/core/search.rs` for buffer overflows or unsafe memory access. We're handling large binary files and memory mapping. I want to be sure we're respecting bounds correctly when slicing the haystack. Look for any `unsafe` blocks and verify the invariants.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4d187a18312f8727", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ae6bce2ed604", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be609460-a51d-4268-81c7-4efd6ef56eb3"}}
{"id": "10da2c34b1c9f70c", "prompt": "Split my current uncommitted changes into two logical commits: one for the updates in `crates/ignore/src/types.rs` and one for the changes in `crates/matcher/src/lib.rs`. Make sure the messages follow standard conventions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "10da2c34b1c9f70c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:fb5c4524ac12", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ed755d3-5ad1-4a01-935f-9aa8f2a9548d"}}
{"id": "c7b556b362e8ec03", "prompt": "PCRE2 のマッチャーがどこで初期化されてるか分からない。`crates/pcre2/src` あたり見てくれない？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c7b556b362e8ec03", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:760313da58d3", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "854e7606-5046-40d8-bf3d-379b0e1639a2"}}
{"id": "1721103d8748fe33", "prompt": "We need to clean up some technical debt in the core crates. Please: \n- Go through `crates/regex/src/` and `crates/matcher/src/` and remove any unused private functions or imports.\n- Standardize the error handling in `crates/pcre2/src/error.rs` to match our internal patterns.\n- Check `crates/printer/src/` to see if we can merge `util.rs` into `lib.rs` or a more appropriate module.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1721103d8748fe33", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f19d19613bbb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "32369416-e3c8-4ed0-b694-8d9972738d01"}}
{"id": "cf4129fdcea847fd", "prompt": "Add a TODO comment in `crates/core/search.rs` noting that we need to optimize the buffer reuse, then commit that change with a descriptive message.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now create a new branch called `optimization-todo` and move this commit there."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cf4129fdcea847fd", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b461fae455e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75dc8be0-8e7f-492c-9d91-6ddf70517355"}}
{"id": "bef2748f6c2a1d01", "prompt": "I need to add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md for the recent changes in the `index` crate and the `ignore` crate updates. Can you draft a concise entry based on the last few commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bef2748f6c2a1d01", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:d37e66cb38b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70e660c4-722b-4816-a8c0-39a4add2addd"}}
{"id": "600e300f863bafb6", "prompt": "Why is the `rg` binary ignoring my `.gitignore` files in subdirectories? I have a `vendor/` folder that should be skipped, but `rg` is still trying to index it when I use `--index`. Looking at `crates/core/index/enabled.rs`, it looks like it's calling `ignore::gitignore::Gitignore::new` but maybe it's not respecting the `ignore` crate's default types properly? Fix the globset initialization in the index builder.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "600e300f863bafb6", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:40a77c00a94d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e2bffd2f-1ebf-4a62-bbd5-6f4b5feeb776"}}
{"id": "b26cc83276683e95", "prompt": "We need release notes for the upcoming version. Can you summarize the major improvements in `crates/ignore` and the new `index` crate scaffolding?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b26cc83276683e95", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e344c0dfbdd7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "908ac6aa-fd3a-4e8a-b78e-68699b4cfba6"}}
{"id": "def53b06f15e5331", "prompt": "Explain the purpose of the `crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs` file. When is memory mapping used instead of standard reading?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "def53b06f15e5331", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:2b72e349d2aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eecec09c-4f20-4dc4-a82b-f3095399107b"}}
{"id": "5fec48fb78669a06", "prompt": "where does the regex compilation happen? specifically looking for the place where we configure the pcre2 backend vs the default regex crate. I saw a feature flag `pcre2` in Cargo.toml but I can't find where the switch happens in the source.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5fec48fb78669a06", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:93e1b096a423", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "32f6138d-c717-4752-94b7-0010afeee61b"}}
{"id": "c9326e25d132e0da", "prompt": "Can you walk me through the implementation of `crates/printer/src/summary.rs`? I want to know how the search statistics are aggregated.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c9326e25d132e0da", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:77ceb1c2c7d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c3096f4-ebf4-4d60-b9e9-7c343c824863"}}
{"id": "adce7f28862fa91f", "prompt": "Run the full test suite: `cargo test --all`", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If any tests fail, copy the output here."}, {"prompt": "Once everything is green, check if the `pcre2` crate tests are passing as well."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "adce7f28862fa91f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0503b10a5ebe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fb0f4cbe-2c91-4b61-b025-1c07656bc56b"}}
{"id": "49af34c10de21e20", "prompt": "I need to standardize how we check for ignored files across the codebase.\n\nRight now, `crates/core/search.rs` calls `ignore::gitignore::Gitignore::matched_path_or_any_parents` directly in a few places. This is getting messy because we also have similar checks in `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`.\n\nPlease extract a common helper function called `is_path_ignored` into `crates/core/flags/config.rs` (or a new module if that doesn't make sense). This function should take a `&Path` and a reference to the `Gitignore` builder.\n\nUpdate all call sites in:\n1. `crates/core/search.rs`\n2. `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`\n\nMake sure it returns a boolean to keep the API simple. I want to avoid code duplication here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "49af34c10de21e20", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b28a1f0488d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "843da11f-9200-4f1f-a32e-3a28b84194f6"}}
{"id": "d8a67b56273fbd1e", "prompt": "Explain how `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` handles the different argument types during CLI parsing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d8a67b56273fbd1e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:46c91647e5c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b22a02b-6732-42a4-8868-81020f6fa14c"}}
{"id": "160f07b7b9648aa1", "prompt": "In `crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs`, the memory-mapped file handling for large files is crashing on Windows with `ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE`. It works fine on Linux but fails on the CI Windows runner. Can you check the file descriptor handling in the mmap implementation? It might be failing to open the file with the correct access rights for paging.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "160f07b7b9648aa1", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ba8ec4d7b570", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2736a71b-9b7f-4f8a-89d3-0ea8aba001bb"}}
{"id": "b1047c12ff28379e", "prompt": "I'm seeing a panic in the CLI when using `--json`. Can you find where the JSON output struct is defined in `crates/printer` and where it gets serialized? I suspect the issue is in how `stats` are handled in the summary.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b1047c12ff28379e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:eea2efde29be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b960f9f5-1f6e-4b7c-ad1a-45ac1793e483"}}
{"id": "86329c109b4d039a", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `ignore` crate docs. How do I configure it to treat a specific file pattern (like `*.log`) as a text file even if it looks binary? I know about `-uuu` for ignoring those rules, but I want finer control programmatically.\n\nAlso, check if `ignore::types::TypesBuilder::add` is the right place to register custom globs for file types.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "86329c109b4d039a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0242b3d875a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adf3d77e-60f9-45de-b362-93d42cf2617c"}}
{"id": "01041f6d76fb5f2d", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest `ignore` update (0.4.33). Can you run the full test suite to make sure nothing broke? Specifically the index tests since those were a bit shaky last week.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, ignore the warning about `benchsuite`. Just tell me if the core tests passed."}, {"prompt": "Actually, can you run just `tests/index/basic.rs` to double-check that specific failure?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "01041f6d76fb5f2d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:aae951d3a9eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "51d68828-7385-4122-92c2-0b470b36ae3c"}}
{"id": "a99bf552cd79a8ff", "prompt": "Hey, just pulled the latest commits. I see `ignore-0.4.33` landed. Can you quickly check the changelog for the `ignore` crate to see what changed in 0.4.33? I want to make sure there's no breaking API change before I bump the dependency in `Cargo.toml`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a99bf552cd79a8ff", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:32ed32e70f0f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59d75dea-e9e4-42c5-9618-ecd27bae888c"}}
{"id": "5039958ab043f63c", "prompt": "Check `crates/globset/src/glob.rs` and tell me how it handles special characters in a glob pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5039958ab043f63c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1bd883721d0d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8439f228-6246-4e8d-898c-93b50de71df4"}}
{"id": "d3d314bfe0fdfdc6", "prompt": "What does the error \"Error: IO error for operation on ...\" actually mean in the context of the `walkdir` crate? I'm seeing this intermittently in `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` when traversing deeply nested symlinks, but the Rust documentation for `walkdir::Error` isn't super clear about which OS errors are caught vs propagated.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "So `ENOENT` is expected but `ELOOP` might be causing issues?"}, {"prompt": "I'll add a specific check for `ELOOP` in the ignore logic to handle circular symlinks more gracefully."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d3d314bfe0fdfdc6", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:77963f84f233", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a1adf57-d3b0-4952-81e2-c0d801cc845a"}}
{"id": "5106638c56fbb8f4", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` but they aren't ready for a commit yet. Can you stash them for me?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5106638c56fbb8f4", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ed01e32aca8d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ebcc5b6-c4a6-4251-881a-f840385ba6de"}}
{"id": "c15d1281ec738270", "prompt": "Check `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` and tell me how the main application state is initialized.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c15d1281ec738270", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:44c48d550d72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf094a0d-d10d-477d-b269-14ed77e1e815"}}
{"id": "e5979c38c01efe78", "prompt": "インデックス機能が無効化されている時の振る舞いは `index/disabled.rs` でやってる？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e5979c38c01efe78", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:6929c6233c33", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1759bdd-5750-4e46-8787-729a374f5aa1"}}
{"id": "b5fd1a7448b3b5b5", "prompt": "crates/cli/src/lib.rs の `main` 関数内で、`flags::parse` を呼び出してるところどこ？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b5fd1a7448b3b5b5", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c78bade58832", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29acef8b-618d-4dbf-97da-56fbda082206"}}
{"id": "8257ced408481619", "prompt": "The `pcre2-sys` dependency is currently pinned to an old version in `crates/pcre2/Cargo.toml`. Can you upgrade it to the latest semver-compatible version? Please make sure the build still works and that we aren't missing any new symbols in `crates/pcre2/src/matcher.rs`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests to ensure PCRE2 support is still intact."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8257ced408481619", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0c05978af90c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebcdf4b6-9f92-45b5-ae2c-63a1e022a286"}}
{"id": "9d675d7c25c7e201", "prompt": "I want to perform a major cleanup of the codebase before the next release. I need you to tackle three separate tasks:\n1. Audit `crates/ignore` and ensure all its recent logic for `is_hidden` and `pathutil` is correctly covered by tests in `crates/ignore/tests/`.\n2. Review `crates/printer` to see if we can unify the way we handle different output formats, specifically looking at how `jsont.rs` interacts with the rest of the printer module.\n3. Check `crates/searcher` for any potential performance regressions in the `mmap` implementation compared to the standard line buffer approach.\n\nPlease provide a separate summary for each part once you've investigated.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d675d7c25c7e201", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:32febd98f8e0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48dd322b-f1bd-40ab-bcd6-13a35b16a090"}}
{"id": "cfcf2859a2f4acba", "prompt": "Check the ripgrep GitHub repository's issues tab. Search for open issues labeled 'bug' and 'index' that were opened in the last 30 days. I want to see if anyone has reported a deadlock similar to the one fixed in `0d9c97e` (though that was `ignore`). Specifically, look for any reports about `crates/index/src/index.rs` panicking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cfcf2859a2f4acba", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:8ab2d15fe344", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fcedc20c-0306-4a72-8337-023c4975662f"}}
{"id": "a291f450f93b8c83", "prompt": "I need to fix a typo in `README.md` in the Quick examples section. After that, please amend the last commit with this fix so it's part of the same commit.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a291f450f93b8c83", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:269a1e6b53fa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85b29715-fff5-456b-8f3c-bd23ad727687"}}
{"id": "ac067f45e499491d", "prompt": "Create a new file `crates/core/flags/complete/fish.rs` with a placeholder implementation for fish shell completions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ac067f45e499491d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:457f651ede38", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d11639a-7362-479c-883a-c2b16f9510ff"}}
{"id": "6565d3c36fc0a132", "prompt": "I need to update the `pcre2` feature. What is the latest version of the `pcre2` crate on crates.io? I see we're pinning it in `Cargo.toml` but I want to ensure we're not severely behind on security patches.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6565d3c36fc0a132", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:7d2d12da8f66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "310e5654-9442-43f8-afcd-584328759d8d"}}
{"id": "80e169c21dc7cba1", "prompt": "Why does ripgrep automatically skip binary files by default? I have a directory full of large log files that might contain null bytes but are text-based. How can I make rg treat them as text without disabling all filters?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80e169c21dc7cba1", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:7c1748c84abb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "61c8fe07-dfc7-4d26-ab50-83375364f22c"}}
{"id": "3414492911871e2c", "prompt": "Who last modified crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3414492911871e2c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a4de6b24d210", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b83b3dfa-2119-4e8a-8e89-60dc1f8efe5e"}}
{"id": "b5bd2e08773ab36a", "prompt": "I need to verify if the latest release binaries on https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases are actually built for macOS x64. The CI badge seems green but I'm getting a \"bad CPU type in executable\" error on my M1 Mac. Can you check the release assets list from the latest version to confirm if we forgot to include the x86_64-darwin binary? Also, check if there's a new Rust version release today that might be breaking our MSRV (Minimum Supported Rust Version, currently set to 1.96 according to recent commits).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b5bd2e08773ab36a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:9d9b57b9b9dc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "409ba530-0659-4604-b445-c03cc3365b51"}}
{"id": "1e95d195a1d9eb3a", "prompt": "Find the definition of the `--no-heading` flag. I need to know which struct holds its state and print it here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e95d195a1d9eb3a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:aa5406e5ee92", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "773c7e34-0ea7-40bb-bf1e-9458b1aeb68e"}}
{"id": "b34d6a6b459c1e70", "prompt": "I noticed that `crates/core/flags/parse.rs` and `crates/core/flags/lowargs.rs` exist. How does the argument parsing strategy here differ from standard `clap` usage? Are you rolling your own parser for performance reasons?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What are the trade-offs of using the custom `flags` module versus a standard command-line parser library?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b34d6a6b459c1e70", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b1bc33ad71cc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f0e14b94-2163-455c-b024-6291e0eda093"}}
{"id": "33d5c69c0d578e8c", "prompt": "Looking at the `crates/core/index` module, it seems like indexing is still somewhat experimental or gated. What is the current state of the indexing feature in ripgrep? Is it enabled by default in the stable builds, and what are the limitations compared to the standard search path?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "33d5c69c0d578e8c", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:9ebef1431483", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a72e5be-9c84-4abc-bd2a-842602ca466f"}}
{"id": "99fb141415add7fe", "prompt": "I'm seeing some interesting logic in `crates/core/flags/parse.rs`. How are the command line arguments being parsed into the internal configuration?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "99fb141415add7fe", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e58642e6fa92", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2152d9ba-cd5a-407b-acae-8f9da3506f06"}}
{"id": "74511809918e9020", "prompt": "I need to fix a deadlock reported in `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs`. Can you review the `try_run` logic there? Specifically, look for any places where a panic might leave the mutex in a bad state. Run the tests in `crates/ignore` in release mode with overflow checking on first.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, run the specific test `gitignore_skip_bom` with valgrind if possible."}, {"prompt": "Let me know if the fix introduces any regressions in the `walk.rs` example."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "74511809918e9020", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e97dfef79902", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80bc0830-4639-4476-b93e-212912ecbec4"}}
{"id": "7e3d9ad220140cc3", "prompt": "Run the integration tests in `tests/index/`.\n\n```\ncargo test --test index -- --nocapture\n```", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7e3d9ad220140cc3", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:7d85166e5fb2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aebd77bf-94fc-4659-bb5d-a8534a43f044"}}
{"id": "e5bd1f4c7d3e6a36", "prompt": "帮我查一下 `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` 这个文件最近是谁改动的，顺便看看最近那几次关于 ignore 逻辑的 commit 都在干嘛。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "展示一下 `0d7054d` 这个 commit 的变更内容。"}, {"prompt": "对比一下 `5ed408e` 和 `435f59f` 这两个 commit 之间在 `crates/ignore` 目录下到底改了哪些文件？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e5bd1f4c7d3e6a36", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e430800d84a3", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c264ad9-c64b-4a23-a8b8-cfac39d24abd"}}
{"id": "0b6d5ded348d982f", "prompt": "The index feature seems broken on dev builds. Can you build the binary with the `unstable-index` feature enabled and verify that `rg --version` outputs the index support flag?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great. Now run `rg --help | grep index` to confirm the new flags are present."}, {"prompt": "Okay, thanks. I'll push this locally."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b6d5ded348d982f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:2f225c889b4a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "265e3543-8985-41e1-b97d-88dda941e140"}}
{"id": "1539560005bc1472", "prompt": "Check the `regex` crate documentation regarding the `Regex::new` error types. Specifically, how do we distinguish between a syntax error and a compilation timeout in the matchers? I'm looking at `crates/regex/src/error.rs` and want to improve the error message sent to the user via `crates/core/messages.rs`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the error handling in `crates/regex/src/matcher.rs` based on this."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1539560005bc1472", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:bc5de0261442", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "00d4e90f-2da8-40c1-9ff9-550608940b80"}}
{"id": "d980c96c69a6f94f", "prompt": "The `rg -uuu` flag should disable all automatic filtering, but it seems like `crates/ignore/src/default_types.rs` is still filtering out `.git` directories regardless. Can you check why the `is_hidden` logic in `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` is still triggering? This is blocking me from searching inside hidden dotfiles.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d980c96c69a6f94f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:9b71df18a50f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f8205e1-7f95-4e1b-a89f-eaf46b6c07b2"}}
{"id": "bf4fa793217d2526", "prompt": "The CI badge in the README is pointing to GitHub Actions. Can you verify that the build is currently green on the main branch? Also, the README mentions binary downloads are available for every release on GitHub. Can you check the latest release tag and confirm the linux-x86_64 binary is actually present and valid?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf4fa793217d2526", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b30914ef8503", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "34af362d-f250-4404-bcff-332a57ccc02b"}}
{"id": "d114f71bc2cd6aec", "prompt": "start a background search on `/tmp/large-data` using `rg -n 'panic' --no-ignore` and let me know when it finishes. Don't kill it if it takes more than 5 minutes, just keep it running in the background.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d114f71bc2cd6aec", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:885a548bc6c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc1827a1-21b9-4c6d-a07e-6ae376855f80"}}
{"id": "600c86c74609841f", "prompt": "The regex literal optimizations in `crates/regex/src/literal.rs` are failing on some unicode patterns. Specifically, when I search for `[^a-z]*\\u{2603}`, the matcher returns false negatives. I've attached a small test case in `tests/feature.rs` that I think demonstrates this. Can you look at the literal stripping logic in `strip.rs` and the matcher in `matcher.rs`? I suspect the char class inversion isn't interacting correctly with the unicode scalar value.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "600c86c74609841f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:3b1d36081dc8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cdf4f5cb-94ce-40ab-a1a0-70332378fbc8"}}
{"id": "74eee9cb4694f2af", "prompt": "Triage findings from the static analysis scan. I see a few warnings in `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` about `unwrap()` usage on Result types. While these might be unreachable, I want to confirm they are truly safe. Also, check `Cargo.toml` for any dependencies with known high-severity CVEs.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "74eee9cb4694f2af", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:7166ca146933", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a39c8b1b-6e88-4ec2-ae76-e6e8c9bda557"}}
{"id": "5cc36afcef151d20", "prompt": "the hyperlinks feature is broken in the reporter output. when I run `rg --json pattern ./src`, the JSONL output includes URLs that aren't valid because `crates/printer/src/hyperlink/mod.rs` assumes `cwd` is always absolute, but if I run rg from a symlinked directory, the paths get messed up. fix this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5cc36afcef151d20", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e5be1a5aa392", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b307101b-a645-4e48-b9e8-637406c7233b"}}
{"id": "fb3780d517bd557a", "prompt": "grep for `TODO` in the source code. I want a list of all unimplemented features and known bugs across `crates/cli`, `crates/core`, and `crates/searcher`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb3780d517bd557a", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e29300576d95", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3dd27011-6f9c-4e01-95d6-b3364fd30607"}}
{"id": "d1248885499e992d", "prompt": "Könntest du meine aktuellen Änderungen in `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` prüfen und sie dann in einen sauberen Commit mit einer professionellen Nachricht überführen?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Kannst du das Ganze jetzt zusätzlich auf einen neuen Branch namens `feature/cli-refactor` schieben?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d1248885499e992d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:8c658838d016", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb335341-89c8-4889-85f9-dc0549018bde"}}
{"id": "d4ababed0aad7b30", "prompt": "I've been messing around with the `crates/cli/src/lib.rs` file and I'm not sure if I want to keep these changes. Can you stash my current work in `crates/cli/` so I have a clean working directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d4ababed0aad7b30", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:96d1151d78ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2e450cf7-0e98-4e76-b85b-f87650fcca39"}}
{"id": "6380808ae9dfbb79", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug the indexing feature. Can you wait until the `benchsuite` benchmark run finishes? I'll let you know when it's done. Actually, just monitor the output and tell me when it hits 'Done'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6380808ae9dfbb79", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b8d0b3f5bc0b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "36edab06-c734-4ed9-85b2-d84f2b527b0e"}}
{"id": "de16646d5c6b7595", "prompt": "Is ripgrep designed to be used as a library? I see a lot of crates in the workspace like `crates/grep`, `crates/matcher`, and `crates/searcher`. If I want to integrate regex search with custom formatting into my own Rust application, which crate should I depend on?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "de16646d5c6b7595", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ccda6ea1cbcb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2fa3c876-fa38-474a-836f-bea68c36cfc6"}}
{"id": "824dec22e927e9d8", "prompt": "Update the `crates/core/flags/doc/template.rg.1` man page template. I noticed the description for `-I` is outdated compared to what `--no-i18n` actually does in `crates/core/flags/defs.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "824dec22e927e9d8", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:dc933f288d87", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb564a7a-1d27-41c0-bc92-7d06ead935b5"}}
{"id": "5f6979aa5ccec9fa", "prompt": "I'm concerned about potential command injection in `crates/cli/src/decompress.rs`. We're spawning external processes for xz/lz4/zstd decompression. Can you review the argument construction logic to ensure we aren't accidentally allowing shell injection or weird flag stuffing? Specifically look at how the command line is built.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add unit tests for edge cases like filenames with spaces or dashes?"}, {"prompt": "Check if we're using `Command::new` correctly or if we need to be more explicit about argument separation."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f6979aa5ccec9fa", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f067b7390c37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "63238593-a0ea-4bea-b1e6-2af785996e5f"}}
{"id": "5d01ac7f7dd30d2e", "prompt": "I need to bump the version in `Cargo.toml` to 14.0.0 for the next release. Just change the root Cargo.toml for now, I'll handle the sub-crates later. Also, add `*.pyc` to `.gitignore` since I keep accidentally committing those.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5d01ac7f7dd30d2e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a81d9807b7d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b96d1b7-1844-4746-9366-744c99bd7d60"}}
{"id": "7f0eb1caeefc26f5", "prompt": "We need to improve our indexing performance. I need you to: \n- Look into `crates/index/src/index.rs` and see if we can parallelize the initial file discovery.\n- Check `crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs` to see if we're using the most efficient mmap flags for large files.\n- See if `crates/core/main.rs` can be updated to allow users to tune the thread pool size for indexing via a new flag.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure the mmap changes don't break anything on Windows."}, {"prompt": "Keep the new indexing flags under an 'unstable' category for now."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7f0eb1caeefc26f5", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f32816f60ccd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5dab9928-5f77-417c-8645-ce03bfd085e4"}}
{"id": "d80f5ff449083efa", "prompt": "Could you create a high-level architecture diagram in Markdown for the project? I want to show how `crates/core` interacts with `crates/searcher`, `crates/regex`, and `crates/ignore`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add a section explaining the data flow from the CLI to the printer module?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d80f5ff449083efa", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a734ff0dbf5c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3049bb5-1b36-4a25-bf4a-36cf7c922a25"}}
{"id": "01891dd92f470b05", "prompt": "In `crates/cli/src/human.rs`, change the error message from 'invalid size' to 'invalid byte size' when parsing human-readable sizes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "01891dd92f470b05", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1ea3b49092d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2fef0575-1813-4393-9812-0cb04d05b806"}}
{"id": "ddfc823edd361e43", "prompt": "Show me how `crates/printer/src/summary.rs` calculates the statistics for the search results.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ddfc823edd361e43", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:d1901e03db06", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81757bd1-ada8-4fd5-95ac-c2f884d02d51"}}
{"id": "4e3ce39f637ae750", "prompt": "where does the `rg -uuu` flag actually get parsed? I need to modify the default behavior to exclude hidden files again but keep the other 'unusual' filters off.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4e3ce39f637ae750", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:0d548d34d536", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "609b2de3-92dd-42db-99c6-00257813236e"}}
{"id": "f47b1bc327644d55", "prompt": "check the recent commit history for anything related to index. I saw `d958105 cargo: add new build-time `unstable-index` feature`. I need to find where that feature flag gates the index module in `crates/core`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f47b1bc327644d55", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ee0534fd75c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5519c5b-44ff-4eb0-bc22-c524d03ea39d"}}
{"id": "f837eba00efa0f34", "prompt": "Hi, I noticed a deadlock in `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` when using the `walk` example with a deeply nested structure that has broken symlinks. The stack trace from `cargo run --example walk -- .` shows:\n\n```\nthread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'attempt to add with overflow', crates/ignore/src/incremental.rs:45\n\nStack backtrace:\n   0: std::panicking::begin_panic\n   1: ignore::incremental::handle::new\n   2: ignore::dir::Visitor::push_dir\n   ...\n```\n\nIt looks like `incremental.rs` isn't handling the case where the symlink count overflows or errors out during walk. Can you add bounds checking in the visitor logic?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` for any iterator state that might be corrupted."}, {"prompt": "Add a unit test in `crates/ignore/tests/gitignore_skip_bom.rs` that creates a circular symlink structure."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f837eba00efa0f34", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b012d871d71a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf37e598-5da5-4bcf-9f54-8608815c8ce2"}}
{"id": "7b24f9e8891a3b14", "prompt": "Ich möchte die Dokumentation in `GUIDE.md` leicht anpassen. Kannst du das übernehmen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7b24f9e8891a3b14", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f7f7612db48a", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33b55a13-1139-4cf7-a075-b33daeafbcf9"}}
{"id": "55622cdafd7b7ff9", "prompt": "list all branches", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "55622cdafd7b7ff9", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:83902ddef6b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33d66ec0-a95d-4cd9-85c8-b83fc11521d4"}}
{"id": "dc3d511d4bb05e6f", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weirdness with how shell completions are being generated. Can you check `crates/core/flags/complete/` and make sure the logic is consistent across `fish.rs`, `powershell.rs`, and `zsh.rs`? Also, verify if `rg.zsh` is still needed or if it should be consolidated into `zsh.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dc3d511d4bb05e6f", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:91ecd0c5f8ab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "960cc135-1103-4472-ae80-24745929efa6"}}
{"id": "c52487cc1b2f5e97", "prompt": "The Rust compiler is warning about unused imports in `crates/core/flags/defs.rs`. Can you find all `TODO` comments in the codebase and tell me where they are? Also, please run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy --all-targets` to fix any linting issues.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you summarize how many TODOs you found?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c52487cc1b2f5e97", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:be9fdb175a88", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0a3d4e34-770b-4740-8bde-dc7cf30fedc4"}}
{"id": "994e5441537fcfec", "prompt": "Show me the git log for today. I need a quick summary of what went in, specifically looking for anything related to the `index` module or `ignore` crate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "994e5441537fcfec", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:87a62869eebe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1bed69eb-48e7-482b-a6bc-2b75d35314bc"}}
{"id": "ac3c0776427b4fe7", "prompt": "I'm looking at `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs`. How does it actually handle the logic for skipping files based on a .gitignore pattern?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ac3c0776427b4fe7", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:eead22ef5a83", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "71c1a314-66cd-4e59-8e05-ca3d5ecedcbe"}}
{"id": "47dbec6950c80a28", "prompt": "The help text generated by `crates/core/flags/doc/help.rs` is truncated for long options. Specifically, the `--type` help text is cut off. Can you check the template in `crates/core/flags/doc/template.long.help` and ensure that the wrapping logic in `doc/mod.rs` respects the terminal width or falls back to a fixed width for TTY output? Also, the man page in `template.rg.1` has the same issue.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update `crates/core/flags/hiargs.rs` to use the new formatting logic."}, {"prompt": "Verify the man page generation works on macOS too."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "47dbec6950c80a28", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:403103b19b29", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf0ddeaf-5cc5-49eb-b247-ebad188055da"}}
{"id": "302ab830e7969216", "prompt": "Hey, stell bitte mal die `benchsuite/runs/2020-10-14-archlinux-frink/raw.csv` Datei für mich wieder her. Ich habe sie versehentlich überschrieben. Ich brauche die Daten von vor dem letzten Commit. Nutze git, um das aus dem vorherigen Commit wiederherzustellen.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "302ab830e7969216", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:50a1fdb1216e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5caa946-1707-4ef9-b161-6c25c026703a"}}
{"id": "4baaab5252c5abc2", "prompt": "Kannst du in `crates/core/search.rs` eine kleine Optimierung am Suchalgorithmus vornehmen, um die Performance bei großen Dateien leicht zu verbessern?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Super, kannst du die Änderung jetzt in einen neuen Branch namens `perf-search-optimization` auslagern und commiten? Schreib bitte eine aussagekräftige Commit-Message dazu."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4baaab5252c5abc2", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:df8758213f30", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f9d78d6-efc2-4d5c-bad2-65c14bb433e6"}}
{"id": "15d7fe249049ec57", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug an issue where ripgrep seems to be hanging on large binary files. Can you find where the binary file detection logic lives? I want to see how it decides to skip a file and if there's any fallback behavior when the magic bytes aren't found.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "15d7fe249049ec57", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:71441c488011", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f326cb2f-04d8-4e07-a626-f9bee3cb5c99"}}
{"id": "3cd2c190e682f55e", "prompt": "The `searcher` crate's `line_buffer.rs` looks like it's manual memory management. The `bytes` crate docs suggest using `Bytes` for shared ownership. Should we migrate `crates/searcher/src/line_buffer.rs` to use `Bytes`? What are the performance implications listed in the `bytes` crate guide?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3cd2c190e682f55e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:9f3c187eb6fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea5518ac-7024-4c28-9606-0544bd0f437b"}}
{"id": "63678772dec438f9", "prompt": "crates/cli/src/decompress.rs - `read` method is returning early instead of continuing to read the buffer when `Read::read` returns `Ok(0)`. This causes incomplete file output for compressed archives (like the `.gz` files in `tests/data/sherlock.gz`). Fix the loop condition.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "63678772dec438f9", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e67e3d201fbb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "210306aa-e477-4e83-8831-413659925be7"}}
{"id": "8aa9b43dd0afdaa0", "prompt": "The CI log says:\n```\nerror[E0432]: unresolved import `crates::index`\n --> crates/core/main.rs:12:5\n  |\n12 | use crates::index::Index;\n  |   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no `Index` in `index`\n```\nI just merged `index` module. Check `crates/index/Cargo.toml` and `Cargo.lock` to see if it's actually being built as a member of the workspace. Fix the import path in `crates/core/main.rs` if needed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8aa9b43dd0afdaa0", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:d09fff984c65", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a4acf6f-2b13-421e-a071-da1da8ba5a77"}}
{"id": "b777e65b177006ac", "prompt": "Looking at `crates/index/src/index.rs`, is the indexing feature currently stable or experimental? I see some commits mentioning `unstable-index` feature. Should I rely on this for production builds?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b777e65b177006ac", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:943a726e27b7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a188d8c8-92c3-4356-9852-000a27ac0e9d"}}
{"id": "1ad60aa95afa6f6e", "prompt": "Rename the `wtr` module in `crates/cli/src/wtr.rs` to `writer` and update all internal references in `crates/cli/src/lib.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1ad60aa95afa6f6e", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:926407903755", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "257b1cb3-a4f5-4f75-a990-7f7ceec126e5"}}
{"id": "4e710ffd38334f8d", "prompt": "Hi, I'm trying to profile a search on the Linux kernel source. Can you set up the benchsuite run for `archlinux-duff`? I need the raw.csv and summary files from the latest run in `benchsuite/runs/2022-12-16-archlinux-duff`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check the `raw.csv` for any anomalies in the timing columns?"}, {"prompt": "No, that's all I needed for now."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4e710ffd38334f8d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:c0950d7ef477", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0109e474-2904-4030-8e0b-c6bbb5777849"}}
{"id": "24780db85c2f3123", "prompt": "Verdammt, der letzte Commit war fehlerhaft. Kannst du den letzten Commit rückgängig machen (revert), ohne den gesamten Stand zu verlieren?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "24780db85c2f3123", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:cc61b2c794e7", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8d4fa6c-ed9d-4497-903a-711a557a924c"}}
{"id": "03010b3d5e7fa3eb", "prompt": "Add a new test case in `tests/binary.rs` to ensure that searching through a directory containing only a null-byte file doesn't crash.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "03010b3d5e7fa3eb", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:fa1080f51f1e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc968e31-7e3c-4c3b-8d8a-7f084c341873"}}
{"id": "839ca5e2c0535ca9", "prompt": "Add a `verbose` boolean field to the `SearcherConfig` struct in `crates/searcher/src/searcher/core.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "839ca5e2c0535ca9", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a32f380d98e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23dbcd34-d36d-4d27-b6de-9f67324fdc3e"}}
{"id": "f2bef2e722672651", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the flow of the decompression logic. In `crates/cli/src/lib.rs`, I see it import from the `decompress` module. Can you show me where the actual decompression for `.gz` and `.xz` formats is implemented? I need to check if we are using the right underlying crates.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f2bef2e722672651", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:42eff5343a61", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "327ab399-e205-4fd6-a5c9-d4c812e5bd90"}}
{"id": "53f51608a09843ad", "prompt": "Why does ripgrep skip binary files by default? I understand it detects them via magic bytes, but if I'm searching a directory full of valid text files that happen to start with a byte sequence matching a known binary filetype (like .zst or .gz headers), should I just use `-uuu`? Is there a safer flag for this?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does `-uuu` also disable the gitignore filtering? I want to keep gitignore but force text mode."}, {"prompt": "Can you give me an example command that enables text mode but keeps gitignore and hidden file skipping?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "53f51608a09843ad", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:4963349575bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "12ddd92f-0990-427a-af4c-abab11fa2a6d"}}
{"id": "4b81baf8d41b8d19", "prompt": "Hey, the completion scripts for fish and powershell in `crates/core/flags/complete/` seem to be missing the new `--index` flag that was added recently. The CLI helps text has it, but the shells don't autocomplete it. Please update `fish.rs` and `powershell.rs` to include `--index` and `--no-index` options so I can actually use tab-completion for this feature.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great. Also check if `zsh.rs` needs updating, I think it might be lagging behind too."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4b81baf8d41b8d19", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:29cd5dd4a82e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "285b2a43-af39-49c7-9f34-75aec4ee5cee"}}
{"id": "75a2c97409bd5323", "prompt": "I need to know how `serde_json` recommends handling large binary data in JSON output. We're using it in `crates/printer/src/jsont.rs` to output match results. Does the official guide suggest using base64 encoding or something else for non-text payloads?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "75a2c97409bd5323", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:27b47ce86d1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66077c28-da1b-4b69-ae56-27638f05f211"}}
{"id": "ed2eef95e3bf0d5d", "prompt": "where is the logic for applying gitignore rules implemented? I need to see where the ignore files are actually parsed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ed2eef95e3bf0d5d", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:ac3c999aaf4b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe0a4fc5-0236-42c5-9270-ccc0e02ec863"}}
{"id": "68f7246edd73c3fa", "prompt": "I need to verify the licensing status of the `crates/globset` crate. The README says UNLICENSE, but I want to double-check the actual `COPYING` and `LICENSE-MIT` files in that directory. Also, can you check the upstream `globset` repo on crates.io to see if the published version has the same license headers? I'm worried about a mismatch.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "68f7246edd73c3fa", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:1b78fbbb8f09", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "087f139a-8926-4a7b-bb60-ee1d5b26b340"}}
{"id": "97a8b9129c71c990", "prompt": "I'm seeing a deadlock in `ignore` when a visitor panics. Can you trace through `crates/ignore/src/gitignore.rs` and `crates/ignore/src/dir.rs` to see where the mutex might be held across a yield point? No need to fix it yet, just give me a hypothesis.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "97a8b9129c71c990", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:f8ab0d0f7ba8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43b09904-7c83-4262-ab21-51231992f3ae"}}
{"id": "5d373cc1bcdbf057", "prompt": "I want to improve the user experience for the new indexing feature. Can you: \n- Add more descriptive help text to `crates/core/flags/doc/help.rs` for all indexing-related flags.\n- Update `crates/printer/src/summary.rs` to show more granular progress during a long index build.\n- Check `crates/core/messages.rs` to ensure the error messages when an index fails to build are helpful rather than just generic errors.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5d373cc1bcdbf057", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:b57abe07d87e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa837888-d82b-446c-8822-173ac1e6489f"}}
{"id": "f7adabeeafd24b51", "prompt": "最近のコミット `d958105 cargo: add new build-time `unstable-index` feature` で変更されたファイル一覧と、Cargo.toml の feature flag の定義箇所を特定して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "その feature が `crates/core` の `Cargo.toml` でどう参照されてるか確認して。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7adabeeafd24b51", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:6e29b2fcac52", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "964c9125-0492-4de6-9b39-a87d60585227"}}
{"id": "db4d458fde8f7351", "prompt": "In `crates/core/search.rs`, add a small helper function called `is_searchable` that checks if a file path is currently being ignored or if it is a hidden file. I'll need this for the new indexing logic.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Now create a new branch named `feature/indexing-helper`, commit this change with a descriptive message, and push it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db4d458fde8f7351", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:a25ea7231367", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "463664d8-1ae8-4454-bdd0-41bb6ed2b10c"}}
{"id": "5427baaf4ecd04a6", "prompt": "Delete `crates/cli/src/escape.rs` since we've refactored it out, and clean up the module declaration in `crates/cli/src/lib.rs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5427baaf4ecd04a6", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:4d8919c53594", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1a50ac42-2593-4084-af25-f4ab79a16bb4"}}
{"id": "077e57df96a172fb", "prompt": "I want to start prepping for the next major release. Can you handle three things: 1) Audit `crates/core/flags/` to see if we can consolidate any of the redundant doc flag modules, 2) Check `crates/ignore/src/pathutil.rs` for any potential performance regressions in the path cleaning logic, and 3) Update the `tests/data/` directory to include a few more compressed formats like `.zst` to match our current support roadmap?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "077e57df96a172fb", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:e24d274bc56d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8377e49d-93f8-444f-a76f-c9b877a9df05"}}
{"id": "e57310af88c29700", "prompt": "In `crates/ignore/src/default_types.rs`, there are hardcoded file type definitions. If I want to treat `.yaml` files as text by default, do I have to modify that source file, or is there a way to extend/override these defaults via configuration?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does the CLI `--type` flag interact with these defaults?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e57310af88c29700", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:8c7906a813ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5df5facb-7dfe-47ee-a0dc-57f90782c121"}}
{"id": "fd48034dcb982797", "prompt": "cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings\n\nI want a clean slate here. Fix any lint errors. Don't touch the `pcre2` crate if it's giving us grief, just ignore that warning for now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fd48034dcb982797", "repo": "ripgrep", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "ripgrep:3d7ed9a168da", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "ripgrep-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "59bcc87d-4c93-4990-8654-0c4ccb29cfdd"}}
{"id": "b411daeefce97d0b", "prompt": "start the server with examples/simple.rb in the background so I can test the streaming endpoint. Use `ruby examples/simple.rb &`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b411daeefce97d0b", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:cb5481b34370", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84aff400-5a6a-4f9f-8bf7-b2995dc37325"}}
{"id": "3be38a0055a9d71d", "prompt": "I'm running the test suite but it's getting stuck during the integration phase. Check if there are any zombie ruby processes running and clear them out.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3be38a0055a9d71d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:357af6a49c35", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb3c3c72-3b8b-472d-942e-91e6c718be27"}}
{"id": "cc40b7b8f35af812", "prompt": "Check if we are pinning any specific versions of rack in the gemspec that might conflict with the new Rack 3.1.x release being tested in CI.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cc40b7b8f35af812", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9499acc8c022", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95ba7f5a-7a43-4d99-9ee1-c2ed90a209e6"}}
{"id": "3339da4298063c00", "prompt": "I'm looking at the `Rack::Protection` setup in our repo. The README mentions `RemoteReferrer` but I'm not entirely clear on its default behavior with non-GET requests. Can you check the official Rack::Protection documentation to see what the default `origins` setting is and if it restricts POST requests by default?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3339da4298063c00", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:73328b4f9200", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c14a6b4-468d-45ba-a586-3cf6619f1fef"}}
{"id": "58b7725ff44c6b84", "prompt": "The `Sinatra::Base.set(:protection, :default)` isn't disabling CSRF protection for API-only routes as I expected. I have a rack-protection version installed.\n\nHere is the relevant `config.ru` and route setup:\n\n```ruby\nrequire 'sinatra/base'\n\nclass APIApp < Sinatra::Base\n  set :protection, except: [:frame_options, :origin]\n\n  get '/api/data' do\n    { status: 'ok' }.to_json\n  end\n\n  post '/api/data' do\n    # I expect this to fail if I don't send a token, but it works without one?\n    params.to_json\n  end\nend\n```\n\nWhen I run:\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://localhost:4567/api/data\n```\nIt returns 200 OK. I thought `:default` included `:method` and `:remote_token`. Why is the token ignored here?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "58b7725ff44c6b84", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:1f50fb614047", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b8f241a-0b1d-4c3d-9045-dd5659763810"}}
{"id": "25777c2214378434", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit I made. Can you amend it to include the missing documentation update in `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/base.rb`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "25777c2214378434", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9f641044ed59", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0b5eabea-c8cd-4000-a05c-f50c39f9b034"}}
{"id": "7fcc1f86cd9a4300", "prompt": "Olá, estou vendo warnings no log do servidor sobre `Rack::Protection::ContentSecurityPolicy`. Vi no changelog recente que houve atualizações nos docs. Alguém sabe me dizer o que mudou na versão 13.0 do rack-protection em relação às políticas padrão? Preciso ajustar o `default-src`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Achei que era só documentação, mas parece que o comportamento mudou. Vou dar uma olhada nos diffs do git log."}, {"prompt": "Ok, então preciso adicionar explicitamente o script-src. Pode me dar um exemplo de como isso fica no `base.rb`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7fcc1f86cd9a4300", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ee34aa649912", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87ca9641-6841-4f1d-acb6-71df09f25160"}}
{"id": "d8f840549b7e33f6", "prompt": "I'm looking at `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/strict_transport.rb` and I need to understand the `max_age` configuration option. Can you find the official documentation for `Rack::Protection::StrictTransport` and tell me what the default value is and how the unit is interpreted (seconds vs milliseconds)?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it support symbolic durations like '1 day'?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d8f840549b7e33f6", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0b3095872411", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "990350b3-e90f-4e93-a123-419ddab01089"}}
{"id": "33db3f53bddc4ba9", "prompt": "Review the MAINTENANCE.md file and see if we need to add any specific instructions for developers working on the sinatra-contrib extension, since it's a separate component in this repo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "33db3f53bddc4ba9", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:355ee1c79279", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9328c15c-e170-440a-93e7-2ae06caee60e"}}
{"id": "620b4399a425e5cb", "prompt": "Can you walk me through the request lifecycle in `lib/sinatra/main.rb`? I want to see the path from receiving a Rack env to returning a response.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "620b4399a425e5cb", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:df7a13a44392", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6117c64b-e2f9-4fed-a9f4-3c3734d20db8"}}
{"id": "65dfe523d53514cb", "prompt": "git blame lib/sinatra/main.rb", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "65dfe523d53514cb", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d7044a497860", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7a4ae231-8c5c-4962-a649-4307fde48423"}}
{"id": "8f4c8ad4b66d2082", "prompt": "I'm getting 503 errors intermittently when deploying our Sinatra app to a specific PaaS. Can you fetch the public status page for Puma (the web server we use) at puma.io/status and Rack at rack.github.io/status to see if there's an ongoing outage affecting our infrastructure? I need to know if this is an upstream issue.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8f4c8ad4b66d2082", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f0953c3b1225", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4d4e4aa-4569-4d29-918e-997f0b5dd784"}}
{"id": "a3719f163e88d928", "prompt": "I'm getting a `undefined method 'match' for nil:NilClass` error when running the tests in `test/base_test.rb`. It seems to happen consistently on the `test_template_lookup` test.\n\nStack trace:\n```\nRuntimeError: Failed to compile erb template\n  lib/sinatra/base.rb:1109:in `compile_template'\n  lib/sinatra/base.rb:1113:in `template_method'\n  test/base_test.rb:245:in `block in <class:BaseTest>'\n```\n\nThe error is coming from `view_paths` being empty or nil in the compilation context. I'm using Ruby 4.0.0 and Sinatra master. Can you check if there's a regression in how `view_paths` is handled in `Sinatra::Base#run`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a3719f163e88d928", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4d044cca999f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3ccac1e-cac0-4c05-8867-a5ef5f513e03"}}
{"id": "f64dda7f2c665dc0", "prompt": "Can you check the latest published version of the `puma` gem? We mention it in the README for running the app. I want to make sure we aren't recommending a version that has known security vulnerabilities or major breaking changes without a clear upgrade path.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f64dda7f2c665dc0", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:75922f14ab22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "45e44710-4da8-4ab1-b6cb-aa25cde3a8e2"}}
{"id": "400bfa86cc757090", "prompt": "帮我看看当前的 git 状态，我刚才乱改了一些东西，先把这些改动全部 stash 起来。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "好了，现在帮我把刚才那个 commit 给撤销了，直接回到 commit 之前的状态，并把工作区恢复干净。"}, {"prompt": "现在把刚才 stash 的内容恢复回来，顺便帮我检查一下 `test/base_test.rb` 能不能跑通。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "400bfa86cc757090", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2f0a54317639", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfb4b943-d770-4f13-b2de-6c07c6d2232e"}}
{"id": "e403e90f566407fd", "prompt": "Find where the default 500 error page image is defined or loaded. I'm looking for the path to `lib/sinatra/images/500.png`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also check if there are other error image constants defined nearby?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e403e90f566407fd", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:1e7615fdd5d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98ed875e-b99e-47d6-bca1-bd440f094edd"}}
{"id": "30280602e2b31aa2", "prompt": "I'm halfway through refactoring `lib/sinatra/main.rb` and I'm not ready to commit. Can you just save my current state so I can move to a different branch without losing anything?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "30280602e2b31aa2", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:223cc6094ec7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd82ce99-1bbe-46cd-a67e-ccd5abf8b2be"}}
{"id": "5450a2f3a2bb054d", "prompt": "How does the `Rack::Protection::ContentTypeIsHtml` (or similar content type protection) implementation work in `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/base.rb`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5450a2f3a2bb054d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d95632a209a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "36591c8b-9d24-4a35-992f-0d5b22ec9186"}}
{"id": "bf9f1916dbace44d", "prompt": "Run the linter on `lib/sinatra/base.rb`. I suspect there are some Rubocop violations in the `redirect` method since I cleaned it up yesterday.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "No, wait, I meant to check `Rakefile` to see if there's a specific lint task defined."}, {"prompt": "Okay, run `rake lint` then."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bf9f1916dbace44d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:21dfb9ecb64c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee09d4d5-5033-4769-aabc-fe8bccdbcab0"}}
{"id": "0c0ea929051f16e4", "prompt": "What would happen if we bumped the Ruby version requirement in the gemspec to 3.0? Check if any of our current tests or the `sinatra-contrib` extensions would break with newer Ruby syntax.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0c0ea929051f16e4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "sinatra:eb17b428956f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bb161f5e-3915-46e5-950a-29cdde60ca05"}}
{"id": "65e9c54f8fc0e103", "prompt": "Can you run a benchmark comparing the response time of `get '/'` in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` vs a simple Rack app? I'm worried about overhead in the routing layer.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "65e9c54f8fc0e103", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:73dc8bddcc58", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d342c105-40d6-4636-bd63-2c1001060af7"}}
{"id": "4ea63efdf3dcd5c4", "prompt": "Check the current status of the rack-protection gemspec on rubygems.org. Specifically, I need to confirm if the latest version published matches the `VERSION` file in this repo (currently looking at `lib/sinatra/version.rb`). Also, check if the main Sinatra README badge on GitHub is green or red for the latest commit `cb22afd`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4ea63efdf3dcd5c4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:fc735376a835", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "572afd52-55b9-4b9a-988f-0047f7592616"}}
{"id": "18f485decf6c8286", "prompt": "Wait until the local server is up and responding on localhost:4567 before running the integration tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "18f485decf6c8286", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:fdec8f753bb0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56141ea5-e9ca-4ef0-8118-365cacd67abd"}}
{"id": "e6e523b99fda7ee7", "prompt": "I need to fix the indentation in `examples/chat.rb`. It's a bit messy.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e6e523b99fda7ee7", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:5201b01f4b86", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f1ed4dda-22de-4fdb-bbfe-d7163d331d17"}}
{"id": "c0b69a9835c0f477", "prompt": "The `sinatra/contrib/all.rb` file is just requiring a bunch of individual extensions. Convert this into a more dynamic loader that iterates over the `sinatra/contrib` directory. This way, new extensions don't need to be manually added to `all.rb`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Make sure `Sinatra::Contrib.new` still works as expected in `spec/extension_spec.rb`."}, {"prompt": "Check if this breaks any lazy loading behavior in `contrib/setup.rb`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c0b69a9835c0f477", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:729c4fc32a00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dd706f8-6e57-4695-93f8-90b7cd771258"}}
{"id": "c9862da10cb64089", "prompt": "I need to know where the default 500 error page is defined. Can you find the implementation of the 500 error handling and where the static HTML content for lib/sinatra/images/500.png is served from?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c9862da10cb64089", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:e488ee2076b1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd79bd64-ee2d-4518-9b19-d6ac64223d40"}}
{"id": "46ed2b0bf76b9f8d", "prompt": "Can you look at my current changes and split them into two logical commits? The first should be the refactor of `lib/sinatra/main.rb` and the second should be the new tests in `test/route_added_hook_test.rb`. Make sure the commit messages follow standard conventions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "46ed2b0bf76b9f8d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:5fa79e49985e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "acc61920-5a6f-4c30-95dc-471230c4f6f0"}}
{"id": "54dfbe7229302976", "prompt": "Trace the source of the \"method redefined\" warnings mentioned in commit e972277. Specifically, which method in the Sinatra codebase is being redefined by the Delegator module, and where exactly is the redefinition happening?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "54dfbe7229302976", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:b058ee426828", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d924471-e7db-4f92-980e-9a4f443ad7e3"}}
{"id": "6a61af00751c0403", "prompt": "I'm trying to use `sinatra-contrib`'s `namespace` feature in my app. I have this setup in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` extensions:\n\n```ruby\nrequire 'sinatra/namespace'\n\nnamespace '/api' do\n  get '/users' do\n    json @users\n  end\nend\n```\n\nBut when I access `/api/users`, I get a 404. The route actually gets registered as `/users` instead of `/api/users`. I checked `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/namespace.rb`. It looks like the `instance_eval` block might be losing the `base_path` context. Can you fix the `namespace` method to correctly prefix routes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6a61af00751c0403", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7fd7142bb208", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e5709f7-eb70-4904-80fb-954d82a06d15"}}
{"id": "6a278789b7d400a8", "prompt": "Remove the `test/views/hello.liquid` and `test/views/layout2.liquid` files as we no longer support Liquid templates in this version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6a278789b7d400a8", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:6ceef16c41f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e3336e3-a067-45a3-b42b-7a29ab23b6d9"}}
{"id": "2951701eab5aab96", "prompt": "I'm looking at `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/json.rb`. How does the `json` helper actually handle serialization? Does it rely on a specific gem?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2951701eab5aab96", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:6267c9a03671", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea0caa25-9cb8-4a95-bef4-c73185dde488"}}
{"id": "a0cf193a9e384146", "prompt": "The `test/views` directory is full of nested directories for template tests (a, b, calc, error). Can you count the total number of view template files ending in `.haml`, `.erb`, and `.slim`? Also, are there any duplicate filenames in different subdirectories that might cause collision errors if we change the lookup order?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Fix the lookup logic in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` to prefer explicit extensions over generic ones if a collision is found."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a0cf193a9e384146", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ecdd67e17187", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b815d30b-d21c-4190-93cd-24e8cf0c82db"}}
{"id": "ad1715ffc38a5d51", "prompt": "Bitte überprüfe die `Rakefile` und `Rakefile` im `sinatra-contrib` Verzeichnis. Wir haben Inkonsistenzen dabei, wie die Test-Suites aufgerufen werden und ob Linter (wie RuboCop, falls konfiguriert) vorher laufen. Ich will sicherstellen, dass `rake test` sauber durchläuft und keine Warnungen produziert. Prüfe auch, ob die `VERSION` Datei korrekt mit den Specs in `test/result_test.rb` synchronisiert wird, besonders nachdem wir Ruby 4.0 Unterstützung hinzugefügt haben.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ad1715ffc38a5d51", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2d5d183e1369", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5fae3fc0-268a-4f02-bb4e-17de0627180a"}}
{"id": "f2c9b694956df099", "prompt": "I'm reviewing the sinatra-contrib gem. How does the `sinatra/namespace` extension actually work under the hood? I see it allows nested routes, but I don't understand how it modifies the routing context or if it just prefixes the path.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f2c9b694956df099", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:180b56cdcf35", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c4133f7-b894-4c47-8d9e-eaba8a9fee2f"}}
{"id": "66bae0da56d1b8bd", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with templates. Look at `test/erb_test.rb`. How is Sinatra determining which template engine to use when a file extension is provided?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this logic change if I'm using a custom extension defined in `sinatra/contrib`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "66bae0da56d1b8bd", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:315d74f7138f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a935c02-9287-4fbe-812c-393b69bfc542"}}
{"id": "895d18fcb0db8333", "prompt": "Quick question: what's the purpose of `IndifferentHash` in `lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb` and where is it primarily used in the core app?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "895d18fcb0db8333", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:39515489e87c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8cca41ad-f1ce-421c-9faa-e5e0610843cc"}}
{"id": "e94d8e256bcca1be", "prompt": "Fix the markdown tests. Recent commonmarker versions are outputting different anchor markup for headings.\n\nLook at `test/asciidoctor_test.rb` and any related markdown tests. They are currently failing because of the anchor format change mentioned in commit `cb22afd` (though that commit only touched a specific test, others might still be flaky).\n\nUpdate the assertions in the test files to match the new commonmarker 2.9.0 output. Also, check `lib/sinatra/base.rb` to see if we need to relax any regex constraints on the rendered HTML output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e94d8e256bcca1be", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8cd0fd891cf2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b2f504f9-b01c-44e2-8a57-924da9033ed8"}}
{"id": "e22126baf9eef66d", "prompt": "In `lib/sinatra/base.rb`, find every instance where we call `logger.info` followed by a literal string interpolation. Refactor these into using keyword arguments or `sprintf` style formatting to avoid allocating intermediate strings when the log level is disabled. Just apply this pattern to the existing calls, don't add new logging.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e22126baf9eef66d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:920607af4e50", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8ec247f-5edb-431a-8fde-d2fdd8e9e949"}}
{"id": "cdf918ae2148b637", "prompt": "We have a bunch of spec helper files under `sinatra-contrib/spec/` and `rack-protection/spec/`. Can you consolidate the setup logic in `spec_helper.rb` for the main sinatra repo? Specifically, look at how `test/views` assets are loaded and ensure my local helper uses the same paths.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cdf918ae2148b637", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:b44923e26b60", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c12aae0-8498-4cee-83e2-70905ba98370"}}
{"id": "6222c6f999a048d3", "prompt": "Qual é a última versão estável do `haml` que eu posso usar com o Sinatra atual sem quebrar os templates em `test/views/hello.haml`? Estou vendo que alguns testes estão falhando e acho que é incompatibilidade de versão.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6222c6f999a048d3", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0617368d08f4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d9a2c9f1-f61b-4654-880d-27c285a482c8"}}
{"id": "6859be63ebcbe517", "prompt": "The documentation for Rack::Protection::EscapedParams in the codebase seems a bit sparse. Can you draft a more detailed explanation of its behavior and options to be added to the relevant docs?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6859be63ebcbe517", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:e303172e2368", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f66bab3-ea4e-46c5-a834-3910dacfb8bc"}}
{"id": "6604f7e2e73ea58c", "prompt": "I need to trace how `Rack::Protection::HttpOrigin` is initialized. Show me the config options it accepts in `lib/rack/protection/http_origin.rb` and where it's mounted in the main Sinatra app if it is.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6604f7e2e73ea58c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7dbe0586d1c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e04d69b8-45a0-405c-a167-3e7d7ebd9644"}}
{"id": "c007efd132f1b099", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `rack-protection/spec/lib/rack/protection/xss_header_spec.rb` that verifies the XSS header is present when the middleware is enabled.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c007efd132f1b099", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:478f3ef98dfd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e8478b8b-720f-4fd6-907b-26149be7c981"}}
{"id": "3977190580b8e619", "prompt": "sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/namespace.rb の namespace 機能が、どのようにしてルーティングのスコープを分離しているのか教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3977190580b8e619", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:07d279d87890", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01bda576-25f7-41cc-bfa8-5828308d03bf"}}
{"id": "44a749923decfa33", "prompt": "Help me debug a memory leak in my Sinatra app. I'm using `sinatra-contrib`'s `reloader` in development mode.\n\n```ruby\nset :reloader, true\n```\n\nI'm noticing that after a few hot reloads, the process memory usage grows by ~50MB per reload and never shrinks. I suspect old route objects or template caches in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` aren't being garbage collected. \n\nSpecifically, look at `Sinatra::Base#set_routes!` or wherever routes are compiled. If `instance_variable_get(:@routes)` is being appended to instead of replaced, that would cause this. Please audit the route registration logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "44a749923decfa33", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:595b6965a8cb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d659966-6611-4f7e-b8d5-0a4240df45c6"}}
{"id": "91f34a430881183e", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug an issue with the `config_file` extension in sinatra-contrib. It seems to be ignoring environment variables in the YAML files. Look at spec/config_file/with_envs.yml and spec/config_file_spec.rb. Can you write a failing spec that demonstrates the env vars not being interpolated, then commit it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "91f34a430881183e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f5d0a76f7297", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c88b09aa-b84d-47f1-be24-9ee2b349ff99"}}
{"id": "6e2fdfed040a2107", "prompt": "examples/lifecycle_events.rb を見ているのですが、Sinatra のライフサイクルイベントがどのように定義されていて、どのタイミングで発火するのか教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6e2fdfed040a2107", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:20d4cc61d821", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d13b9cb-3663-4e71-ac6d-22fe70d08a8c"}}
{"id": "eadb3d1341929013", "prompt": "Audit `lib/rack/protection/http_origin.rb` and `lib/rack/protection/strict_transport.rb` for header injection vulnerabilities. I need to know if an attacker can override existing headers if passed through `X-Forwarded-Host` or similar. Also check `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection.rb` for any missing validation on the config options.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Refactor `http_origin.rb` to use strict array matching instead of regex if possible."}, {"prompt": "Write a test case in `spec/lib/rack/protection/http_origin_spec.rb` that attempts to inject a newline into the `Origin` header."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eadb3d1341929013", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c53247c24608", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "959719fd-cf85-4c71-a1d9-6c5dbdcf89d6"}}
{"id": "ca3ca5ea28344696", "prompt": "Add .bundle/ and pkg/ to .gitignore. I don't want these showing up in git status.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ca3ca5ea28344696", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:91697fbe903c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afb85d21-7130-44f6-a7d6-6e27964d32eb"}}
{"id": "3705ce44ad36820a", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the `commonmarker` behavior mentioned in the recent commit `cb22afd`. The commit fixes markdown tests for heading anchor markup. Can you look up the commonmarker 2.9.0 changelog to understand exactly what changed in how it generates HTML anchors for headings? I want to make sure we don't break anything else.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3705ce44ad36820a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:507a58916872", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "efd35d3a-c313-4504-80c1-868053ac79a8"}}
{"id": "0ebb6f0ae6a279c4", "prompt": "What is the lifecycle of a Sinatra application from the perspective of `lib/sinatra/base.rb`? Specifically, how does the DSL get mixed in and where does the Rack app actually get built?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ebb6f0ae6a279c4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7bb248427875", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0bf42cc2-b237-4fee-985a-539149435122"}}
{"id": "ea873da693a98e16", "prompt": "Give me an interactive shell in the root directory. I want to poke around the lib files manually.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ea873da693a98e16", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:16631159fb66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a92a15d-6269-4de8-b460-8e01dda96cf3"}}
{"id": "cc699d153e7919cd", "prompt": "Find all occurrences of `Sinatra::Base` being subclassed or included in the main library files. I want to see the inheritance hierarchy.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc699d153e7919cd", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0f2940f38ebc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "afff105e-70d0-484a-bc57-b28242eb575f"}}
{"id": "08f15da3a246d5e1", "prompt": "The `sinatra-contrib` directory has a lot of small extensions that are structured almost identically (like `cookies`, `config_file`, `json`). They all define an extension class, require Sinatra, and then append to the Base class.\n\nI want to refactor the boilerplate in `lib/sinatra/contrib/all.rb` and the individual extension files to use a more declarative style. \n\nSpecifically:\n1. Create a basic DSL or helper in `lib/sinatra/extension.rb` that allows defining these extensions with less boilerplate.\n2. Update at least `cookies.rb` and `json.rb` to use this new pattern.\n3. Make sure `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/contrib.rb` still loads them correctly.\n\nThis is purely structural; don't change the actual functionality of the extensions themselves, just how they are defined and registered.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "08f15da3a246d5e1", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:89766e333a5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "238e9e2c-fd99-4a88-b4f5-3e0b7d4cc327"}}
{"id": "41b14c56d4b9737d", "prompt": "I'm seeing some confusion in the team about `Session Secret Security`. Can you check the Rails or Rack session store documentation regarding best practices for session secret storage in production? Specifically, I want to know if it's recommended to store it in an environment variable versus a config file, and what the minimum entropy requirements are.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "41b14c56d4b9737d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2eb159429b3c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6f5f6198-4a84-487f-927b-f23d908b9db7"}}
{"id": "b2212abbf1ddc164", "prompt": "Ich muss die CI-Pipeline für `ruby-head` stabilisieren. Wir sehen Fehler in `test/asciidoctor_test.rb` wegen `commonmarker` 2.9.0. Bitte sieh dir diesen Test an und vergleiche ihn mit der aktuellen Version der `commonmarker` Gem, die in unserer `Gemfile` oder `.yardopts` referenziert wird. Ist es besser, den Test zu temporär zu skippen (wie in Commit `25fb001` angedeutet) oder die Test-Assertions anzupassen, damit sie mit der neuen Markdown-Anker-Generierung umgehen können? Ich brauche eine Empfehlung basierend auf den letzten Changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b2212abbf1ddc164", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c875e2d85dfa", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6b45f2c6-5583-4157-81bb-89a7e5dea150"}}
{"id": "938d284c52976a00", "prompt": "How does `Sinatra::Base` handle route matching? Specifically, I'm looking at how it processes the request through the registered routes.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if `sinatra/main.rb` adds any specific middleware for this process."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "938d284c52976a00", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:076e6ce7d6aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "780f4ae3-85e7-4d7c-adb4-9978800dd003"}}
{"id": "ee7618367b0443ab", "prompt": "The `README.md` has a huge table of contents and the template languages section is getting messy. Can you count how many unique template extensions are currently supported (looking at the `test/views` directory and the `README`)? I suspect we have a mismatch between what's documented and what actually exists in the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ee7618367b0443ab", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:163e16b14a23", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2bc6a1d8-c1f0-4693-94e3-21c5cdd8decf"}}
{"id": "022a0a54be92ada1", "prompt": "Audit the current dependencies in `sinatra.gemspec` for any known security vulnerabilities, specifically looking at 'rack' and 'puma'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "022a0a54be92ada1", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2fea1eea2274", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fda10b2-c45b-43df-95c9-6a3bb357be2a"}}
{"id": "b56911f81c4b96c7", "prompt": "I'm cleaning up the error handling in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`. There are multiple places where we check for a `halt` condition and then manually construct an error response. It's getting repetitive.\n\nLook at the `call` method and the routes execution logic. Can you refactor the common pattern of checking `env['sinatra.error']` or catching `Sinatra::Base::Halt` into a centralized helper method? I want to reduce duplication in how we decide whether to render a default 500 or let the error propagate.\n\nSpecifically, focus on the logic around lines 400-450 in base.rb where the main dispatch loop lives. Ensure the refactored code maintains the exact same behavior for both successful routes and raised exceptions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b56911f81c4b96c7", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4b96e912a13f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "72fa8136-604b-4ee4-8e68-8ea4be7afeb7"}}
{"id": "445d1442b516a4c0", "prompt": "where is the `respond_with` method actually implemented? I see `sinatra-contrib` has it in the spec but I need the main logic file.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "445d1442b516a4c0", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:69d0a5ad8980", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ef25a80-a5f6-4653-9236-d4438e1d8f5e"}}
{"id": "81ef7fe83673c766", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside `Rack::Protection::XSSHeader`? I want to see how it's actually appending the headers to the response.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81ef7fe83673c766", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:13d2c4700fa9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7ff7efd2-4bab-461a-a836-89dc44832938"}}
{"id": "e1c6316c72d5e234", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest changes and the build is failing on ruby-head with commonmarker 2.9.0. Can you fix the markdown tests so they pass with the new heading anchor markup? See commit cb22afd for reference if you need context, but make sure test/asciidoctor_test.rb isn't broken in the process.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e1c6316c72d5e234", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c937938d0444", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eeb6eb96-e133-4d0e-b503-8909e917b632"}}
{"id": "fb5088eed3141c94", "prompt": "Preciso implementar rate limiting para a rota de login em `lib/sinatra/base.rb`. A documentação oficial do Rack::Protection recomenda usar `Rack::Protection::BruteForce`. Pode me mostrar quais são os parâmetros aceitos por esse middleware e como configurar o limite de tentativas? Link para a documentação online seria ótimo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb5088eed3141c94", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c210129bd2bd", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ab2c23f-0658-4b10-997c-9ebb029e2136"}}
{"id": "cf9b77fdc38e31ce", "prompt": "Estou lendo sobre a feature de streaming no Sinatra (vi em `examples/stream.ru`), mas não tenho certeza se o `Puma` que estamos usando suporta response streaming nativo com a versão atual. Pode me confirmar qual a versão mínima do Puma necessária para a feature `stream` do Sinatra funcionar corretamente?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cf9b77fdc38e31ce", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d6120dec3ed4", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "113fa395-1fd3-4a76-a5a3-66ac411c3076"}}
{"id": "5723e963d5c9e747", "prompt": "Refactor the template lookup logic in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`. Currently, `find_template` and `lookup_template` have overlapping logic for handling directory prefixes. Can you merge these into a single responsibility flow? Keep the external API exactly the same.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5723e963d5c9e747", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ddbdca2e3d85", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70d6636b-be65-4667-a61d-f9ee80174b47"}}
{"id": "fb0cbc34a061f36d", "prompt": "In `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection.rb`, there's a list of all the middleware classes. Can you list out the public API methods exposed by each subclass in `lib/rack/protection/`? I want to make sure the main `protection.rb` file is requiring them all correctly so `Rack::Protection::FrameOptions` doesn't blow up if only the base is loaded.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fb0cbc34a061f36d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ac005047b28c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ba062b5-7fcc-402c-b388-9825ddc88aea"}}
{"id": "e79dd2fdf580f25f", "prompt": "what's the difference between the current state and the version at commit 946812b?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any changes in the rack-protection directory specifically?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e79dd2fdf580f25f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:69d35bd9db66", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "96fb9fa1-be18-4ca5-aa80-575b96506ed3"}}
{"id": "20027eb32759dd35", "prompt": "Please run the linter and formatter on the whole repo. Specifically check lib/sinatra and rack-protection/lib. If rubocop finds anything, fix it automatically.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "20027eb32759dd35", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9d6fa0093ba9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f2b53e8b-cd69-4369-882e-6532eb5a4e1d"}}
{"id": "0ee3f50d3d54c261", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior in the markdown tests. Can you check if upgrading commonmarker to 2.9.0 is a requirement or if it's causing the heading anchor markup issue mentioned in the recent commits?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0ee3f50d3d54c261", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "sinatra:a12ed2df8694", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a5d06fff-a33d-4ef6-adaa-31760af160ff"}}
{"id": "50cfa71df23b3719", "prompt": "I'm seeing '422 Unprocessable Entity' on some legacy apps using Sinatra. Is there a specific CVE for Rack::Protection's `strict_transport` module that affects versions prior to 1.17? I need the CVE ID for our security audit.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks. Can you also check the current live response headers from the Sinatra official site (sinatrarb.com) to see if they are currently enforcing Strict-Transport-Security?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "50cfa71df23b3719", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:bf2453dcfaea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a8550a5-2c02-41a4-a0b3-1344e3c8d1f2"}}
{"id": "0b79646789c319fa", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug a weird issue with `Haml` rendering in Sinatra. I remember a CVE involving Haml and XSS. Can you look up if there's a known CVE for Haml versions < 6.0 that affects Sinatra's template rendering? Also, can you verify if the current Sinatra release on RubyGems (https://rubygems.org/gems/sinatra) lists Haml as a dependency or if it's optional?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0b79646789c319fa", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f52cce314a17", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "267e753b-ee63-4d9d-8b81-47f944cc7f92"}}
{"id": "bf0565f92e0c962f", "prompt": "Kannst du mir helfen, die Template-Rendering-Pipeline für `.erb` und `.haml` Templates in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` zu optimieren? Ich habe das Gefühl, dass die Cache-Logik für die Template-Kompilierung bei häufig wechselnden Views (z.B. im Entwicklungsumfeld mit Reloading) ineffizient ist. Bitte analysiere `test/erb_test.rb` und `test/haml_test.rb` sowie die entsprechenden Template-Handler-Logiken in `base.rb`. Ziel ist es, festzustellen, ob wir die Neu-Kompilierung bei einem File-Change beschleunigen können, ohne die Sicherheit der Sandboxing zu gefährden.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Zeig mir bitte die relevanten Methoden in `base.rb`, die für das Finden der Template-Datei (`find_template`) zuständig sind."}, {"prompt": "Wie sieht es mit `test/views/` aus? Sind dort Layout-Templates korrekt verlinkt?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bf0565f92e0c962f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:249576325936", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a26cf4ea-2342-4b15-be8c-7088f24c92ec"}}
{"id": "962a5f4fad49ad2f", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify the session handling logic in lib/sinatra/base.rb?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "962a5f4fad49ad2f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4ff09b0ac9a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "554efb85-8f1c-4fdb-ba57-98e638087883"}}
{"id": "1aa627fc8013c41e", "prompt": "Looking at the README, it mentions 'literal templates'. When I define a route like get('/home') { haml '%h1 Hello' }, is this rendered in the same context as a named template file? Specifically, can I access instance variables defined in the main app scope?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any performance penalties for using literal templates vs file-based templates in production?"}, {"prompt": "How does error reporting look when a literal template fails to render?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1aa627fc8013c41e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0d0c5219ddfe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "246ca240-9620-4a42-9665-1e796aa94d65"}}
{"id": "135a7a65e22c6c21", "prompt": "lib/sinatra/base.rb の中にあるルーティングの仕組みについて教えてください。リクエストが来た時にどのようにハンドラが選択されるのか知りたいです。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "135a7a65e22c6c21", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:5c3e61794e68", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3eb30eb-8829-49aa-88c2-5a7c39e1ac33"}}
{"id": "7610dd77d487c103", "prompt": "I need to audit our gem dependencies for security compliance. Can you extract the gem names and versions from `sinatra.gemspec` and `sinatra-contrib.gemspec`, then check `rack-protection/rack-protection.gemspec` as well? I want a flattened list of all unique gem names we depend on across these three files.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any version constraints that allow for major version drift that might break API compatibility?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7610dd77d487c103", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:154b48fc39d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9804bc64-701e-4e57-8da8-acbe6e71ac63"}}
{"id": "8883b9ad82370e73", "prompt": "Looking at the `rack-protection` specs, I see tests for `frame_options`, `xss_header`, etc. Are these enabled by default when I call `set :protection, :all`? I want to make sure my app is secure out of the box.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8883b9ad82370e73", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:cc0101e0427b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "686e2d9d-e7be-4302-9e60-dd724d286fbe"}}
{"id": "309f637d938ce687", "prompt": "I'm cleaning up the `rack-protection` submodule. Several middlewares like `content_security_policy`, `http_origin`, and `strict_transport` have very similar initialization logic and error handling. Can you extract a common helper or base class method to reduce the DRYness? Look at `base.rb` to see what's already shared.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "309f637d938ce687", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:1ffc524e90e1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfdb4c0e-fade-4ae9-8f2d-214249cb142c"}}
{"id": "11101915d4d35461", "prompt": "I need a secure random string to use as my SESSION_SECRET for local testing. Generate one and show me how to set it in an environment variable.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "11101915d4d35461", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:96ceffaa352d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f072447-b061-4054-8159-9083db26fe24"}}
{"id": "c50b2a22cf5d44cc", "prompt": "Add a new test case in `test/request_test.rb` to verify that the response body is correctly handled when it's empty.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c50b2a22cf5d44cc", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:33a4d68893ed", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "893f2a88-4579-4518-baae-1260ea31e00e"}}
{"id": "dee0bca41b3f1e08", "prompt": "The error message in `lib/sinatra/show_exceptions.rb` is a bit too cryptic. Can we make it more descriptive by including the specific line number where the exception occurred?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dee0bca41b3f1e08", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9b9839b34a5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb1af4e0-8706-4cf0-a0b5-69fad9fd2f54"}}
{"id": "e5d9760d6d4b153d", "prompt": "Update `sinatra.gemspec` to support Ruby 4.0. I noticed from the commit log that we've been dropping Bundler pins and adding CI matrix jobs for Ruby 4.0.0. The gemspec should probably reflect this stability. Also, update `rack-protection/rack-protection.gemspec` and `sinatra-contrib/sinatra-contrib.gemspec` with the same change. Just check the `Rakefile` to see if there's a default ruby version constant I should use, or default to the latest stable if not.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e5d9760d6d4b153d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:78a8777508b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "020392c1-c9cb-4449-a315-9f0f799f4893"}}
{"id": "9671d3d2fd25fef3", "prompt": "Can you run the linter (rubocop) and fix any offenses it finds in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`? Please be careful not to change the logic, just the style.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9671d3d2fd25fef3", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c0eb0258ccf7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf24de88-2c1d-4b90-8e99-c45fc3dca9d0"}}
{"id": "1a8efc376ecbd246", "prompt": "The error message in `lib/sinatra/show_exceptions.rb` is too vague. Can you make it more descriptive when a route is not found?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1a8efc376ecbd246", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d5efc1793a37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0b42f411-1802-4711-85d2-596e410de7b4"}}
{"id": "66a4e83e07122b5a", "prompt": "In `lib/sinatra/base.rb`, add an optional `timeout` parameter to the `get` method definition.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "66a4e83e07122b5a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:05e9785cb21b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7df62f7b-f08e-446a-93b6-4047f1a926c9"}}
{"id": "07dc5ce455d31f4e", "prompt": "I need to verify if `sinatra-contrib` is loading correctly. Write a simple script that requires `sinatra` and then `sinatra/contrib/all`, and print out which extensions are loaded. Run it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "07dc5ce455d31f4e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:07d8562a0831", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "827ba147-f108-4568-886e-9776879901f7"}}
{"id": "f2191004758392ac", "prompt": "I'm trying to figure out if Sinatra has built-in support for CSRF protection or if I need to rely on external gems. Can you explain the security architecture, specifically how `rack-protection` integrates with Sinatra?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does enabling `protection` in the base app configure all the middleware in rack-protection?"}, {"prompt": "How do I specifically disable `HttpOrigin` protection if it's causing issues with my API?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f2191004758392ac", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:3968c067e2be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "17ebff4a-6e0d-478f-aa32-2a444b05350b"}}
{"id": "4121372cf84a1123", "prompt": "I want to standardize how we handle logging across the project. Currently, `lib/sinatra/base.rb` uses its own logger setup, but `sinatra-contrib` has `quiet_logger.rb` and `custom_logger.rb` which are inconsistent.\n\nPlease:\n1. Check `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/` for all logging-related files.\n2. Refactor `quiet_logger.rb` and `custom_logger.rb` to use a shared internal helper from the main `sinatra` gem if possible, or at least align their interfaces.\n3. Update `sinatra-contrib/spec/quiet_logger_spec.rb` to reflect these changes.\n\nThis is a low-priority refactor, so take your time to make the code clean.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4121372cf84a1123", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:953a85bcc966", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d0d540a3-75c6-406f-a604-79edc6df4b30"}}
{"id": "63226e4e17529ed3", "prompt": "The rack-protection middleware seems to be throwing warnings about 'method redefined'. Can you run the protection specs and filter for those warnings? I want to see which headers are triggering this in Delegator subclasses.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63226e4e17529ed3", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d3c0aaf0082d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ddef5be7-5f54-4388-b5f2-82c6577f91b4"}}
{"id": "ec188b6d5da73561", "prompt": "We need to add 'commonmarker' to the development dependencies for testing markdown rendering. Update the gemspec and let me know if I need to update the Rakefile too.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ec188b6d5da73561", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4ce940323d85", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05598ef1-cf44-492e-80da-edbdc8f7e81d"}}
{"id": "39cd4dd2835c8ede", "prompt": "I need to bump the version for the upcoming release. \n\nPlease update `VERSION` in the root directory and also ensure `lib/sinatra/version.rb` matches it. Then update the changelog section in `README.md` to reflect this new version number.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "39cd4dd2835c8ede", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:b0ac4547a803", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0c0e946c-a5c5-4124-b931-0b5357169b2a"}}
{"id": "21d7cee32767b5b9", "prompt": "I need to verify if the `rack-protection` gem is vulnerable to the latest cookie-tossing bypass mentioned in recent security blogs. Can you check the current status page for RubyGems.org or the `rack-protection` GitHub security tab to see if there are any open advisories for `CookieTossing`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "21d7cee32767b5b9", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0389f6a2b85b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0725ff7d-86bd-4cc0-8786-48945b463fbb"}}
{"id": "123fe44432658701", "prompt": "In the sinatra-contrib suite, what's the difference between `sinatra/cookies` and using the standard `Rack::Cookies` middleware? Does the contrib plugin do any magic parsing specifically for Sinatra apps?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "123fe44432658701", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d66de7651c76", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21a1aa02-a8ef-40f8-bfc8-6a98d6f5544a"}}
{"id": "ab41f6488c9d073a", "prompt": "I'm in the middle of refactoring `lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb` but I need to switch over to fix a critical bug in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` immediately. Stash my current work.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "I've finished the bug fix. Restore my work from the stash and let me know if there are any conflicts."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ab41f6488c9d073a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f1030560f317", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e655436-214d-4ba7-9400-bb6f53dda5bf"}}
{"id": "c647ca069902a32f", "prompt": "Triage this SonarCloud finding: `\"instance_eval\" should not be used in \"lib/sinatra/base.rb\"`. It claims this allows arbitrary code execution. I know this is used for template context binding. Can you justify why this is safe in the Sinatra context, or identify if there's an untrusted input source reaching this eval block?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a comment explaining the security rationale for the `instance_eval` usage."}, {"prompt": "Run the specific test suite related to template rendering to ensure no regressions."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c647ca069902a32f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9b6b9a6e22fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0fa947ab-ae19-4ec0-906a-663f5df89a1e"}}
{"id": "34553199df194ab3", "prompt": "Create a draft for the release notes for the next version. Based on the recent commits, make sure to highlight the Ruby 4.0 compatibility improvements and the various documentation fixes in rack-protection.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "34553199df194ab3", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8fb838b3e1db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d5e6363-9eec-471b-ae98-fc7066b14b1d"}}
{"id": "c6a789f2946ecaa6", "prompt": "I'm running `bandit -r lib/sinatra` and getting a lot of false positives on the metaprogramming parts of `base.rb`. Specifically, lines around `send` and `instance_eval` in the DSL helpers. Can you distinguish the safe usage from potential eval injection vectors? Here is the relevant snippet:\n\n```ruby\ndef method_missing(name, *args, &block)\n  @template_handlers[name] ? yield(*args, &block) : super\nend\n```\n\nAlso, check if there are any hardcoded secrets in the `examples/` directory that I accidentally committed.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you generate a remediation plan for the `http_origin` protection in `rack-protection` to ensure it handles wildcard domains correctly?"}, {"prompt": "Update the README to add a security section warning about `instance_eval` usage in custom middleware."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c6a789f2946ecaa6", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:cde5439bd0f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "064d604b-848f-4aed-b144-1441aa44b746"}}
{"id": "052d097f6cc7e070", "prompt": "Open a terminal session in the rack-protection directory so I can run the specs there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "052d097f6cc7e070", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f28160183f21", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e78220df-eccf-4611-aaa6-41d4be3d4220"}}
{"id": "62573047abb2c4fd", "prompt": "Where is the logic for `Rack::Protection::HostAuthorization` implemented? I need to understand what headers it checks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "62573047abb2c4fd", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4624e3bcaef3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "649daf28-95e2-4440-aa05-16618454e899"}}
{"id": "c58ef1619ed8bd4f", "prompt": "Hey, the `rack-protection` specs are failing in CI on Ruby 4.0 now. \n\nCheck ` rack-protection/spec/lib/rack/protection/*.rb` and see why the assertions are throwing errors. I saw a commit `074d376` related to Ruby 4.0 testing. \n\nFix the specs so they pass. Don't change the source code unless absolutely necessary, but the main issue seems to be in how the test helpers in `spec/support/` are mocking the Rack env.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, make sure `rack-protection.gemspec` is updated if we need newer Rack versions for these tests."}, {"prompt": "Push this so we can see the CI badge turn green."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c58ef1619ed8bd4f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:56dda845369d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74fb9507-ea53-4a5a-a9e5-4df9e4bbed5b"}}
{"id": "10529bee73971fd0", "prompt": "안녕하세요. Sinatra 5.0 업데이트 후 `Rack::Protection::StrictTransport` 옵션 설정이 반영되지 않아서 문의 드립니다. 앱에서 `set :protect_with, { 'Strict-Transport-Security' => 'max-age=31536000' }`와 같이 설정해도 헤더가 응답에 포함되지 않습니다. rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/strict_transport.rb 코드를 보니 설정 값을 읽어오는 부분이 이상해 보이네요. 원인 분석과 수정 부탁드립니다.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "10529bee73971fd0", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:13c83ce0daec", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "864363f3-1bda-49db-97ce-8f602c5d2cd0"}}
{"id": "72fc5a59473c148a", "prompt": "We're upgrading Ruby versions in CI. I saw a commit about Haml v7 compatibility. Can you find the official Haml release notes or migration guide to see what changed in v7 that might affect our `test/haml_test.rb`? Specifically looking for any deprecation warnings or syntax changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "72fc5a59473c148a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:85bcd557a1f0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "60d1c54c-ab15-4e60-962e-72c3c6754af0"}}
{"id": "1aa5cbfa383ca060", "prompt": "Cleanup old build artifacts. Remove anything in tmp/ and re-run the compilation step just to be safe.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1aa5cbfa383ca060", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7c95dab8cc8e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4c7141c-6d62-4a2e-a2c7-c359003dc9d7"}}
{"id": "74551aa00820a655", "prompt": "Can you add a new entry to the CHANGELOG (if we had one, just suggest the text for a 'Contributors' section) that acknowledges the recent work on updating documentation across the rack-protection sub-directory?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "74551aa00820a655", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:dc4228b4f4c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f22697ff-f585-4ac3-8e21-83ce130c5e5b"}}
{"id": "1d385575e15333f4", "prompt": "I need to switch tasks immediately. Can you stash my current work in `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/json.rb` so I can pull the latest from main? I'll need to bring it back later.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1d385575e15333f4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:e8e6e7a5b559", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8ea11393-1162-4ae5-9b41-04d56d7265c8"}}
{"id": "fe8690fd7eeaff75", "prompt": "Es gibt einen merkwürdigen Zustand in `lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb`. Dieser Hash sollte sowohl Symbol- als auch String-Keys gleich behandeln, aber in manchen Integrationstests (`test/integration_test.rb`) verhält er sich inkonsistent. Bitte untersuche die Implementierung von `IndifferentHash` und die damit verbundenen Tests. Ist die `default_proc` richtig gesetzt? Wurde bei der Migration zu neueren Ruby-Versionen (wir testen ja jetzt auch mit Ruby 4.0) etwas übersehen? Bitte gib mir eine Analyse der Edge-Cases.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fe8690fd7eeaff75", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f60aba11a6a7", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09c96aa2-17a7-4109-aac4-003e7c744405"}}
{"id": "6921bbc06cba0592", "prompt": "list all local branches", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6921bbc06cba0592", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:81664d96efc3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b7dc830f-b5ff-4282-a941-db1c1d4710f4"}}
{"id": "d54b5342de0dff4c", "prompt": "compare the branch containing the recent CI fixes for Ruby 4.0 with main", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d54b5342de0dff4c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ed465e063b16", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b441810-7948-4c69-837f-7f988e8fcdf7"}}
{"id": "02bd970aacdf0677", "prompt": "Move all the files in the `rack-protection/spec/support/` directory into a new directory called `rack-protection/spec/helpers/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "02bd970aacdf0677", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:356bc7a499ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d4f2a96c-3cad-4906-a46b-0becb4442ec8"}}
{"id": "be9f6976a7f29aca", "prompt": "We need to verify that Rack::Protection::HostAuthorization is correctly parsing the allowed hosts. Check out spec/lib/rack/protection/host_authorization_spec.rb and run just that spec file. I expect one failure related to subdomain matching.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "be9f6976a7f29aca", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:a082d6b2468d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0d17ddc0-f4c8-4bd6-8213-9ca99d6ab311"}}
{"id": "b58b3d188127112a", "prompt": "rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/remote_token.rb のロジックを説明してください。トークンの検証プロセスはどうなっていますか？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b58b3d188127112a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:03d16ce64782", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "643a75ce-925f-4fe5-9c4d-d7b23f44ce78"}}
{"id": "a0dafaf6edb20e9c", "prompt": "In `lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb`, the `deep_merge` method is not handling nested hashes containing arrays correctly. It's overwriting the array instead of merging/concatenating or preserving order.\n\nExample:\n```ruby\nh1 = { a: [1, 2] }\nh2 = { a: [3, 4] }\nh1.deep_merge(h2)\n# => { a: [3, 4] }\n```\n\nBut I expect `{ a: [1, 2, 3, 4] }` or at least a consistent merge strategy. This is breaking our API where we allow clients to override config arrays.\n\nCan you fix `deep_merge` in `IndifferentHash` to handle arrays by concatenation, and update the tests in `test/result_test.rb` to reflect this behavior?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a0dafaf6edb20e9c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:461a136349e0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba12edc2-ccdf-47e9-b983-bc75cc582ba4"}}
{"id": "6422a2fe7d2fe62a", "prompt": "Estou tentando fazer a migração do Sinatra 2.x para a versão 4.x. O `Sinatra::Base` está reclamando que o método `enable :sessions` está depreciado ou não funciona como antes. Existe uma guia de migração oficial ou alguma issue no GitHub que explique a nova forma de configurar sessões?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6422a2fe7d2fe62a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d1829817baf2", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "11ec50c6-428f-4665-8955-89fd72a07fb9"}}
{"id": "fb3fd4b7481a1dea", "prompt": "I need to know where the `Stream` response type is defined. Is it in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` or somewhere else?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does `lib/sinatra/base.rb` also handle the logic for streaming headers, or is that delegated?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fb3fd4b7481a1dea", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:45959091f564", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e84a074-a2ec-41f1-8267-4c20ec01b032"}}
{"id": "ebf0da4014e3354b", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing a warning: \"method redefined\" coming from Delegator in the test output. It looks like e972277 removed some dead code but maybe left something behind in lib/sinatra/base.rb. Can you clean that up? I want those warnings gone.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ebf0da4014e3354b", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ed0c5645c5d5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cd663eaf-42ff-4ee0-98b8-ef78f95e9da1"}}
{"id": "9b093ead67ebafbe", "prompt": "start sinatra locally so I can debug a websocket connection. I'm using `examples/chat.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9b093ead67ebafbe", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9c8d6bb56c9e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "824c3cfa-911f-41d3-8777-667b9e68de9b"}}
{"id": "ce8f643ad2152291", "prompt": "In `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/json.rb`, add an optional `:pretty` parameter to the JSON response method to allow indented output.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a corresponding spec in `sinatra-contrib/spec/respond_with_spec.rb` to verify this."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ce8f643ad2152291", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f0bfef248180", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9cc542e8-4cf9-48b9-b812-42a8724d6354"}}
{"id": "e7f484e6be92e02c", "prompt": "Can you make a small adjustment to `lib/sinatra/base.rb` to add a default timeout value to the configuration, maybe set it to 30 seconds? Just leave it as a draft for now.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That looks good. Now create a new branch called `feat/default-timeout` and commit this change with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e7f484e6be92e02c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:fe63a7cb7082", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9b22523-7152-4079-97c2-86328e7cdef4"}}
{"id": "2ae51b4c7aed3d41", "prompt": "The CI is failing on ruby-head because commonmarker 2.9.0 is rendering heading anchors differently. I see commit cb22afd fixes this but I want to verify locally. Can you run the asciidoctor tests to make sure they pass now?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, please run the full test suite against the sinatra core tests as well to ensure no regressions."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2ae51b4c7aed3d41", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d963e8671002", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5243b33e-b17d-4e89-907f-0a83b1ee93db"}}
{"id": "e7665746dba9e55d", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error in my integration tests. Can you look at `test/integration_test.rb` and see if there's any reason it might be failing with a 404 during the startup phase?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e7665746dba9e55d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8b3d7812a2ea", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ece1c212-1cb0-4d58-8f91-5388b468f033"}}
{"id": "5d29884acafaa14d", "prompt": "O erro `Rack::Protection::RemoteToken` está sendo levantado em ambientes de staging. A documentação do rack-protection diz que isso é por falta do token na sessão, mas estamos usando cookies. Como eu configuro isso para confiar no cookie de sessão?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Não encontrei config específica para isso no README do rack-protection. Pode verificar a signature do método `remote_token` no `lib/rack/protection/remote_token.rb`?"}, {"prompt": "Parece que a opção `:origin` é que está causando a confusão. Obrigado por esclarecer."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5d29884acafaa14d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8645d977e75f", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0fe3868f-a0db-418e-939d-09f01c6eb798"}}
{"id": "14b9b5112491b83c", "prompt": "Look at `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/capture.rb`. How does the `capture` method intercept the response body?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does it work with streaming responses?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any edge cases where it might fail to capture the full output?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "14b9b5112491b83c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:590604f3a3b3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "315461c5-30a7-4b42-95a1-fd85066dccaa"}}
{"id": "80e337677f34ee85", "prompt": "I need to bump the version for the next release. Bump VERSION, update sinatra.gemspec, and sinatra-contrib/sinatra-contrib.gemspec. Don't forget to update the Gemfile lock if it exists or point to the right local paths.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80e337677f34ee85", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8b1af6892f52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a97378e-e027-4a2e-a3d0-0b2e415c28cf"}}
{"id": "0073afdc059e0e96", "prompt": "Who last modified lib/sinatra/base.rb and what was the reason for the change?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0073afdc059e0e96", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7c128c16d9a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "acad4f81-6d63-4fd2-9edd-598389fcd014"}}
{"id": "bd5859a7a5efec6a", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `rack-protection/spec/lib/rack/protection/xss_header_spec.rb` that ensures the header is correctly set when the middleware is active.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bd5859a7a5efec6a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f5df438c999c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2354117c-88a6-4244-8752-95652b560f9f"}}
{"id": "cbee676c93983169", "prompt": "sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/json.rb の実装を確認したいです。JSONレスポンスを返す際、内部でどのような処理が行われていますか？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cbee676c93983169", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:5b74d8f56968", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d0df286-d703-49c3-9f67-d07eeb6276ff"}}
{"id": "3e532929986c84f2", "prompt": "Hey, quick question about `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/config_file.rb`. I want to make sure I'm using the supported YAML versions correctly. What does the Sinatra Contrib README or the gem's official docs say about which YAML parsers are recommended or supported for the `config_file` extension?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3e532929986c84f2", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:75732946919b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3209d03-1e8a-4abb-b25b-3bb98d9526e5"}}
{"id": "8bf7483ae9cf6f22", "prompt": "grep -r 'TODO' lib/ spec/ test/ --include='*.rb' and list them out. I want to see what technical debt is pending.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the first TODO, is it still relevant given the recent commits?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8bf7483ae9cf6f22", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:85b0ecb33113", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "604a67ca-f3f9-4dc3-9c15-568f31b979d8"}}
{"id": "b5673598ae57711a", "prompt": "I'm seeing weird anchor tag generation in the markdown output. The commit msg says something about commonmarker 2.9.0. Can you run the asciidoctor tests to see if they pass now? If they fail, paste the error here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b5673598ae57711a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9d26bcd463fa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "69284b01-05c9-42fc-a518-5aba647daac7"}}
{"id": "c740138f994cf3f7", "prompt": "Error in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`: `Sinatra::NotFound` is bubbling up to Rack instead of being caught by the application error handler.\n\nStack trace:\n```\nSinatra::NotFound\n  /lib/sinatra/base.rb:2234:in `handle!' \n  /lib/sinatra/base.rb:2242:in `call!'\n```\n\nIt seems like the `catch(:halt)` or `catch(:pass)` isn't wrapping the route lookup correctly when using `optional` parameters. If I define:\n\n```ruby\nget '/:id(.:format)' do\n  # ...\nend\n```\n\nAnd request `/nonexistent`, it should return a 404 page, not crash. Check the `Sinatra::Base#default_endpoint` logic or the route matching in `find_route`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Why is it crashing? Is `Sinatra::NotFound` being raised but not rescued? Add a rescue block for `Sinatra::NotFound` in the main call stack if it's missing."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c740138f994cf3f7", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:99083f692ed7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2c59d64-1a23-4858-ae7d-46786410a186"}}
{"id": "b03d33454f925e61", "prompt": "I'm looking at the rack-protection specs. There's a spec for HostAuthorization in rack-protection/spec/lib/rack/protection/host_authorization_spec.rb. The docs were improved recently but I want to make sure the spec still covers the new behavior mentioned in commit 057ce52. Can you review the spec and add any missing cases for the new HostAuthorization options?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b03d33454f925e61", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c0a720f7dfdf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "abce95f1-b051-4106-b1f3-26d2744fcbc8"}}
{"id": "83bd4119e5fa5d3f", "prompt": "把 `lib/sinatra/base.rb` 里的 `set` 方法做个微调，增加一个对 `nil` 值的校验，如果传入 `nil` 就抛出一个 `ArgumentError`。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "83bd4119e5fa5d3f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:54e5a7fbb67e", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0103e7cc-361d-4639-af51-41ac4bb76b03"}}
{"id": "d2cb3aeaa23c9945", "prompt": "Explain how the `sinatra-contrib` `namespace` feature works. I want to organize my routes into groups but I'm not sure if it creates a new sub-application or just a scope.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can namespaces in `sinatra-contrib` have their own before/after filters?"}, {"prompt": "How does `namespace` interact with the main app's helpers?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d2cb3aeaa23c9945", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:c3c45d0cc2fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbde88ba-0944-4cd6-a880-368854e4d039"}}
{"id": "250ed58789df6b25", "prompt": "Hey, I just pulled `cb22afd` and now `test/asciidoctor_test.rb` is failing. It looks like a regex mismatch. Can you look at the diff in that file and adjust the expected output for the commonmarker 2.9.0 changes? I need those green checks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "250ed58789df6b25", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:aafd83990eaa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad343a60-e977-419b-ae0a-404e9a5e0aea"}}
{"id": "7a46d28b6fc8c8da", "prompt": "I'm seeing warnings about method redefined in Delegator. I saw a commit 'Avoid method redefined warnings in Delegator (#2139)' but I can't find the code changes in the current tree. Can you search for any code related to `Delegator` or `method_missing` that might be suppressing these warnings?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7a46d28b6fc8c8da", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8b6da06a99d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d14fdfd7-f897-4d25-aa5e-ec840505885d"}}
{"id": "de6d45b8e6c98e09", "prompt": "I noticed in the git history that they dropped the Bundler 2 pin for Ruby 4.0. What does that imply for compatibility with newer Ruby versions? Do we need to update our Gemfile lock files manually?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "de6d45b8e6c98e09", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:44847609c4f1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1391d8c1-2b79-49f6-91c2-76e46d0e1aef"}}
{"id": "b2b92333f748a0c2", "prompt": "Which test file covers the `streaming_response` functionality? I'm getting a weird timeout issue with streaming and want to see how it's tested.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b2b92333f748a0c2", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:05d6b56b230c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d4541bb0-319f-481f-a717-4b620f63deb6"}}
{"id": "64741f7709104cf4", "prompt": "What is the difference between `sinatra` and `sinatra-contrib` in terms of dependencies and required files? I want to keep my main app lightweight.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "64741f7709104cf4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:58296ff36922", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb168ebe-b1bb-4788-8184-e23cdeaf1b6e"}}
{"id": "53251477eb8d81aa", "prompt": "The `Rack::Protection::ContentSecurityPolicy` middleware is injecting the nonce incorrectly for inline scripts in Sinatra templates.\n\nWith Haml:\n```haml\n%script{:nonce => content_security_policy_nonce}\n  console.log('hello');\n```\n\nThe nonce in the header doesn't match the one in the script tag when I use `Sinatra::ContentFor`. It seems the nonce is being regenerated for the header vs the template evaluation.\n\nIn `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/content_security_policy.rb`, can you ensure a single nonce is generated per request and attached to the request Env so it can be retrieved via a helper in Sinatra?\n\nSpecifically, add a `csp_nonce` helper to `Sinatra::Base` that reads from the env.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "53251477eb8d81aa", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d9fbcd0826a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87766f20-497d-4224-a752-4523dae4714f"}}
{"id": "509fe5ffd9c232e8", "prompt": "I suspect there's a secret key or API token in the git history. Please scan the entire repo for strings matching `[A-Za-z0-9]{32,}` that look like AWS keys or GitHub tokens, excluding the vendor directories and standard gemspecs. Focus on `examples/` and `test/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "509fe5ffd9c232e8", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:350c3bfda028", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9bb70253-18ca-4108-8d82-13e260ce7203"}}
{"id": "73882a7b29e89f2e", "prompt": "Add a small helper method to `lib/sinatra/base.rb` that allows us to retrieve the current request path with a trailing slash toggle.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "That looks good. Create a new branch called `feature/path-helper` and commit this change with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "73882a7b29e89f2e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:cb58bca222d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4daf046d-6c73-4074-b34b-7ed759f5d37b"}}
{"id": "1560b13e7318b3bd", "prompt": "Start the simple example app in the background and curl localhost:4567. I want to make sure the basic 'Hello world!' response works without the server crashing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1560b13e7318b3bd", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8a6abf53a44f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c8e009bd-0f40-47ed-9dd2-171dcaf178c2"}}
{"id": "e6bc14d53598599a", "prompt": "Scan `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection` for any middleware that doesn't properly escape output or validate Content-Type headers. Specifically look at `xss_header` and `content_security_policy`. Are there any cases where user input flows into these headers without sanitization?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e6bc14d53598599a", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9aae000b1b34", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aa00c7c3-2197-4123-9072-8b9de1ab8c35"}}
{"id": "e955d36eaf778190", "prompt": "In `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/config_file.rb`, the yaml parsing logic is duplicated across the different file types (yaml, yml). Consolidate the YAML loading into a private method so we only have one place to fix encoding issues if they come up later.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e955d36eaf778190", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:b61476e455c2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0915188-ba8f-49ae-8c85-409456c8cddf"}}
{"id": "bf26c85192ac0a3e", "prompt": "We have a dependency on `rack-protection`. Can you look up the official documentation for `Rack::Protection::HostAuthorization`? I want to understand how it handles the `allowed_hosts` configuration when behind a proxy. Does it check the `X-Forwarded-Host` header by default?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bf26c85192ac0a3e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "sinatra:569d77421359", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "15be9fd9-4747-4aeb-87ce-5f783a623296"}}
{"id": "bdb872203e465d1f", "prompt": "I just tried to use `Sinatra::RespondWith` from sinatra-contrib but it's failing with `Gem::LoadError` when I try to render a `.json` response without an explicit format.\n\nHere's my code:\n```ruby\nget '/users' do\n  @users = User.all\n  # No explicit content_type or respond_to\nend\n```\n\nError:\n```\nGem::LoadError - You have already activated json 2.0.0, but your Gemfile requires json 2.5.1.\n```\n\nI have both versions in my Gemfile. Why is Sinatra-contrib pulling in a specific version of JSON in `lib/sinatra/json.rb`? Can we make it more flexible or remove the hard dependency?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bdb872203e465d1f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:3f6d695ed9b5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "458de993-2ea2-47d8-a919-7a0e1bb41ddf"}}
{"id": "8d060577a280d4ee", "prompt": "show me the commit 0c88089", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8d060577a280d4ee", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:72f9e1999862", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a663be3-e5a1-4d63-b650-a010d418416f"}}
{"id": "43ccd8c2423e16d4", "prompt": "Check `lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb`. Is this just a wrapper around a standard hash, or does it implement custom key lookup logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43ccd8c2423e16d4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2d4af37129fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d896748-61a9-40a4-a303-09d466fc1ffa"}}
{"id": "0525c5aa07e3fba4", "prompt": "Explain the template lookup logic in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`. How does it decide which engine to use based on the file extension?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0525c5aa07e3fba4", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:72a62a7b8655", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86a2a93c-c6f5-4f33-8ffd-ec2b6cfd0f88"}}
{"id": "581b6d847d79f440", "prompt": "I'm trying to figure out the dependency graph for the `sinatra-contrib` gem. Can you parse `sinatra-contrib.gemspec` and list out all the development dependencies vs runtime dependencies? I need to know what's actually loaded when a user does `require 'sinatra/contrib'`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "581b6d847d79f440", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9410e3ee0c81", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c916fa90-30c1-4f68-8b2b-4ba9a4bffe5f"}}
{"id": "cf02927b531f5872", "prompt": "We need to clean up the legacy template handling in `lib/sinatra/base.rb` and the associated tests. It's getting messy.\n\n1. Refactor the `find_template` method to be more readable.\n2. Add explicit deprecation warnings for any template engines that are marked as deprecated in the docs (specifically looking at the list in README).\n3. Update `test/base_test.rb` to ensure these warnings are actually emitted and the return values are correct.\n\nDon't change the core logic, just the structure and the warnings.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did you touch `sinatra-contrib` files? I need to make sure we aren't breaking dependent gems."}, {"prompt": "Run the full test suite to make sure no regression in template lookup times."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "cf02927b531f5872", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "sinatra:2a645bc72e91", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "751fd71a-3760-4c44-a162-0044ff1e7e0c"}}
{"id": "406bdfabe6de8940", "prompt": "Review `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/config_file.rb`. It loads YAML/ERB config files. Is it susceptible to arbitrary code execution if a user-controlled YAML file is loaded? I see `YAML.load` being used without an emitter check or safe mode flag in older Ruby versions. Verify the version compatibility and security implications.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "406bdfabe6de8940", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f6112e90dfa5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "85bf238f-5fb2-4282-a1ad-aa42561b6bfe"}}
{"id": "177b332d251dd011", "prompt": "Compare the README.md with the version in the previous tag to see what documentation was added recently.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "177b332d251dd011", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:3ffb9c0ee3ac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d0f16f8f-95f8-4314-b5c2-3834a228c247"}}
{"id": "7b431b13c33db43d", "prompt": "I messed up the last commit. The change I made to `rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/base.rb` shouldn't have been part of that commit message. Can you amend the last commit to fix the description?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7b431b13c33db43d", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:8e34f96bf414", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ed94be5d-1635-440c-b05f-831a82fce80e"}}
{"id": "dc8dfb351887fac7", "prompt": "We need to bump the version before release. Update VERSION to 3.1.0 and reflect that change in README.md if there's an explicit version mention there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc8dfb351887fac7", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:89dc9872e304", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d0f9532-dd06-45f6-bc91-defeea87c806"}}
{"id": "741200c222c182ec", "prompt": "Where is the `Sinatra::Contrib::All` module defined? I'm trying to trace how the contrib gems are loaded when I require 'sinatra/contrib/all'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "741200c222c182ec", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f19cc7e44d98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87c34bf5-3aa1-4bd1-85d8-781c10f0b880"}}
{"id": "546eaedbaaece2bf", "prompt": "I need to add a new HTTP origin validation rule. Find where `Rack::Protection::HttpOrigin` is defined and list all the places it is instantiated or configured within the rack-protection directory. Also, point me to the spec test that covers its basic functionality.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "546eaedbaaece2bf", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:633f810c6c72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "898e24f7-46bb-4c03-b599-fa8e03d3c177"}}
{"id": "6ddf82c5b289e5a8", "prompt": "Update the README.md to include a new section on 'Middleware Integration' using examples from the rack-protection directory. I want users to see how they can easily plug in protection modules.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6ddf82c5b289e5a8", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:6c7710013a6b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "41d910d9-9a06-4cf7-bbbc-167474988c60"}}
{"id": "71df8c9ad9d8276e", "prompt": "Actually, disregard the last few changes I made to `sinatra-contrib/lib/sinatra/json.rb`. I want to go back to how it was before I started this session. Revert those changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "71df8c9ad9d8276e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:a8e85eacbe2f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80b51307-6293-4df9-9004-97c695a3ad83"}}
{"id": "5bb1740e1c8e1517", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the examples/simple.rb but it says the port is already in use. Can you find what PID is running on 4567 and kill it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5bb1740e1c8e1517", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "sinatra:02a7baaaa598", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "749a19f3-51fb-4fa0-bbc9-4fbdac820f55"}}
{"id": "3632e45e5bec342f", "prompt": "I'm trying to upgrade from Sinatra 2 to 3. The release notes mention breaking changes with Rack 3. Does Sinatra 3 drop support for the `content_type` symbol lookup, or is that still there?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What are the exact MIME type changes that broke backward compatibility?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any code snippets I need to update for the new Rack response API?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3632e45e5bec342f", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9fa5a5335cab", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4bea4198-a8be-4375-91e7-8ce8527d0aa1"}}
{"id": "39765cfd72481e23", "prompt": "Where are the mime types registered? I'm trying to understand why my custom `application/yaml` isn't getting picked up in `lib/sinatra/base.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "39765cfd72481e23", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:28a40fe14d19", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f6542a4-eae9-4688-b209-7d2372135216"}}
{"id": "2de04234308aebbe", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of trailing whitespace and inconsistent indentation in lib/sinatra/base.rb. Please run rubocop on it with --autocorrect to fix style issues and then fix any remaining errors manually.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if the tests still pass after these changes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2de04234308aebbe", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "sinatra:612cd38a5ec3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6c6223a4-6879-41c3-a78e-aba388d7bbcc"}}
{"id": "d15306cb50256a89", "prompt": "Why is rack-protection bundled with Sinatra but not enabled by default? I want to understand the philosophy behind this security design choice. When exactly should I manually enable it in a new app?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What happened in version 2.0 or 3.0 that changed this behavior?"}, {"prompt": "Can you list the default protections that are now opt-in?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d15306cb50256a89", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:a7bb614ed273", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e30e3c26-d8e5-4430-87c1-d549fbf4e71a"}}
{"id": "c1eed80f99d11e1b", "prompt": "I need a high-level architecture diagram in Mermaid format for the README. It should show the relationship between sinatra, sinatra-contrib, and rack-protection. Just a simple text-based representation for now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c1eed80f99d11e1b", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "sinatra:828f0a085e3e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "20b0ebc1-3151-4516-b8c1-467d5a72ff95"}}
{"id": "29ce4a2bd928547e", "prompt": "run bundle exec rake spec", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "29ce4a2bd928547e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:85506e18d8c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4378cd3d-e210-4e09-9df0-e56c43ac51a7"}}
{"id": "bd208e43915286a9", "prompt": "In the Sinatra README, it says: \"The code you changed will not take effect until you restart the server. Please restart the server every time you change or use a code reloader like rerun or rack-unreloader.\"\n\nWhy doesn't Sinatra handle auto-reloading by default? Is this a deliberate design choice to keep Sinatra lightweight, or are there technical reasons related to how Ruby loads files?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bd208e43915286a9", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:71a49da791b1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "105df40f-18ec-499a-b110-3e55b8d6ea2a"}}
{"id": "1e0dcfad270dd637", "prompt": "Please refactor `lib/sinatra/base.rb` to make the `redirect` method cleaner. It feels overly complicated with all the query string handling and status code logic mixed together.\n\nSpecifically, look at lines around 950-1000. The logic for `url_encode` and the `halt` call is messy. I'd like to extract the URL construction into a private helper method and separate the status code handling.\n\nAlso, there's a comment about Rack's behavior that seems outdated. Can you verify the current Rack spec for `redirect` and update the comment if needed?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1e0dcfad270dd637", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "sinatra:14b66ae544a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b483e4e-9aaf-4ae2-aedb-b4c69c2a2417"}}
{"id": "91d058d988bc7a24", "prompt": "I'm seeing a weird issue in `examples/chat.rb`. Can you add a `timeout` parameter to the chat configuration to allow users to specify how long a connection stays open?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "91d058d988bc7a24", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:74ef9e1b925b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "677d14b5-2e33-4d56-ad0a-7e57dafc02f2"}}
{"id": "f74bae2720cac49b", "prompt": "Hey, I know the docs say `sinatra-contrib` includes `content_for`, but I want to verify the live behavior. Can you hit `https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra` and take a screenshot of the README to see if they mention `content_for` support in the contributing section? Or just check if the `sinatra-contrib` badge on the main repo README links to the correct gem page.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f74bae2720cac49b", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:10ec89a3eab6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "947c52f9-92ba-4a6c-95d9-cc0db24437cd"}}
{"id": "b6c1bd055a6677e5", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the full test suite but it's hanging on the integration tests. Can you check `test/integration_test.rb` and see if there's a known issue with the server start helper? Also, please run just the `base_test.rb` suite to make sure the core isn't broken.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b6c1bd055a6677e5", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "sinatra:f19ba5c60d1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5bee5f5f-9f3a-4638-9b49-a5d27412c713"}}
{"id": "3faa3f905b5c1c08", "prompt": "I see `sinatra/config_file` in the contrib repo. I want to load environment-specific YAML configs. Does this extension support ERB interpolation inside the YAML files, and how do I specify which YAML file to load without hardcoding the path?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3faa3f905b5c1c08", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "sinatra:ecc1e2f5acdf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b58b91d-3c57-44ef-9744-edbad167a76c"}}
{"id": "d7b8c22902c01daf", "prompt": "grep for 'content_for' across the sinatra-contrib lib directory. I need to know which views engines support it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d7b8c22902c01daf", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:1e07bbc082fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e224291-2d94-4484-8b44-bf8aad9f1422"}}
{"id": "02bd56f6e2ba7b81", "prompt": "Delete the `lib/sinatra/images/500.png` file. It's no longer being used by the application.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "02bd56f6e2ba7b81", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "sinatra:d475f56428db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4683daa-01bf-4625-915e-d02ce241a588"}}
{"id": "6ee68add7b99f1ed", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `examples/chat.rb` but they are a mess. Can you look at my current changes, split them into two logical commits (one for the new route and one for the updated helper), and commit them to a new branch named `refactor/chat-example`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6ee68add7b99f1ed", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:a1d91ef20366", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2b632c0b-efc0-448d-beca-0562c60f7719"}}
{"id": "4ae04735344bba1c", "prompt": "That last commit `0c88089` actually introduced a typo in the comments. Can you revert that specific commit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4ae04735344bba1c", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "sinatra:9f88849aa928", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e35960ea-c0d4-4714-87a6-2fb9baab86f9"}}
{"id": "a3faf452258d4cdc", "prompt": "lib/sinatra/indifferent_hash.rb が何のために存在していて、通常の Hash と何が違うのか具体例を挙げて教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a3faf452258d4cdc", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "sinatra:883a2eb048b1", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aadc99f8-cf49-48ad-b84b-2e8768455e43"}}
{"id": "78bc88eaff6316c1", "prompt": "Quick question: Is the `sinatrarb.com` live site currently down or under maintenance? I tried hitting it and got a timeout. Also, can you check the current status of the `rack-protection` GitHub repository issues to see if there are any open tickets related to `remote_token` authentication failures?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "78bc88eaff6316c1", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "sinatra:0da5a8104db6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1014c98-80f0-406b-a9f7-f72e62367d1e"}}
{"id": "a36a6145ee8374a2", "prompt": "The tests for `commonmarker` in `test/asciidoctor_test.rb` seem flaky on ruby-head. Can you check if this is excluded in the CI config or if we need to look at the gem version constraints?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a36a6145ee8374a2", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "sinatra:7882a8212f68", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb203318-cc37-4e9e-b35c-ceb929b9a4f1"}}
{"id": "86813ae8f071a95e", "prompt": "In `test/base_test.rb`, we have a lot of repetitive `assert_equal` calls for status codes (200, 301, 302, 404). Create a helper method or a block to standardize these assertions across the test suite. Apply it to the existing tests in this file first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "86813ae8f071a95e", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "sinatra:4fe1d861d3f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "274d0c10-c43f-47ea-8224-f58cd80d4d84"}}
{"id": "537ce4fafecb21ef", "prompt": "Show me the diff between the current version of rack-protection/lib/rack/protection/base.rb and the version from a few commits ago.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "537ce4fafecb21ef", "repo": "sinatra", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "sinatra:e4d7c0a50ec6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "sinatra-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "486e5cd6-e413-47e6-9cc5-1872aad16b6a"}}
{"id": "ffe17986d2938da9", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird content-type header in my error responses. Trace where the content type is determined in the ErrorHandler. Specifically, I want to know where `forceContentType` is checked or reset.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ffe17986d2938da9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:8329614c26e3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1b95acf4-0034-4217-b118-6d13dbedb89c"}}
{"id": "12706f20193e9adb", "prompt": "where's the code that stops decoding route arguments twice? commit 417c189 says it's fixed but I want to see the actual change in the strategy handlers.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "12706f20193e9adb", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:ef5cc164752b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1249f445-49c3-4a4c-b51e-12a4a40bdb3e"}}
{"id": "ea458c59fdb75ad3", "prompt": "The `Slim\\Error\\Renderers\\XmlErrorRenderer` is not escaping special characters in the stack trace or exception message, leading to malformed XML. This is a security issue (XSS via error output).\n\nPlease update `Slim/Error/Renderers/XmlErrorRenderer.php` to properly escape all string content within the XML response. Use `htmlspecialchars` or `libxml` escaping functions appropriately.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ea458c59fdb75ad3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:1fb3edb321a5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a9603d13-7a49-4f9d-b03d-b835e18d02c7"}}
{"id": "bc199bca57b2b2ad", "prompt": "Triage de vulnérabilité XSS : En regardant `Slim/Error/Renderers/HtmlErrorRenderer.php` et `Slim/Error/Renderers/PlainTextErrorRenderer.php`, est-ce que les données d'erreur (message, trace) sont correctement échappées avant d'être affichées ? Je crains une faille XSS si l'erreur provient d'une entrée utilisateur non validée.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bc199bca57b2b2ad", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:e6d6f05c3323", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4a404656-1931-4dcb-bd7f-0146c4da3083"}}
{"id": "7e5256419635f027", "prompt": "I'm hitting an issue with `Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php`. When an exception is thrown inside the route handler, the error handler is executed twice if I'm using custom error handlers. \n\nHere is the reproduction case:\n1. Register a custom ErrorRenderer.\n2. Throw an HttpException.\n3. The response contains two 'Content-Type' headers or the body is doubled.\n\nCheck `Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php` and `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php`. It looks like maybe we are not checking if the response has already been emitted or handled by the inner handler.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7e5256419635f027", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:360f080be005", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50e7ad11-e5be-4fdb-beec-10d3b06eac1d"}}
{"id": "3c4708518f27ba3b", "prompt": "Add a new property `$isCached` to the `Slim\fastroute` dispatcher logic if it's not already there, or just check how `getAllowedMethods` handles its internal cache.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3c4708518f27ba3b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:3cd3e98602aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47f09137-da26-4e42-af15-9e74c70fc1f4"}}
{"id": "a7694a05fb2a0436", "prompt": "报错信息：`Class 'Nyholm\\Psr7\\Factory\\Psr17Factory' not found`。我装了 nyholm/psr7-server，但 AppFactory::create() 还是找不到类。去查一下 Nyholm/psr7 的官方文档，Psr17Factory 到底在哪个包里？是不是得单独装另一个包？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a7694a05fb2a0436", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:108c0e619a02", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "116c1064-08e7-4811-b22c-f9b72f23bc4f"}}
{"id": "3e9391675c3c2302", "prompt": "我在看 HTTP 状态码的定义，`HttpGoneException` 是 410。去 PHP 官方文档或者 RFC 7231 确认一下 410 Gone 和 404 Not Found 的具体语义区别是什么？在 Slim 的错误处理程序中，应该把 `HttpGoneException` 映射到哪个错误渲染器？我看 `JsonErrorRenderer` 好像默认不支持所有状态码。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3e9391675c3c2302", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:89c325fd0309", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2886b57d-8086-4f40-8e07-b0f78a02d4d0"}}
{"id": "332eaf72adff220d", "prompt": "Scan pour secrets : Peux-tu parcourir les fichiers de configuration et de test (`phpunit.xml.dist`, `tests/`) pour m'assurer qu'aucune clé API, mot de passe ou token n'est en dur dans le code ? Merci de vérifier spécifiquement `tests/Mocks/` et `tests/bootstrap.php`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "332eaf72adff220d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:787b2de1dc13", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f218a0f1-1031-4f40-a87e-2b0b8d6a91dd"}}
{"id": "84afa0187d23b7db", "prompt": "帮我生成一个用于本地开发测试的随机 API 令牌，至少 32 位字符，包含字母和数字。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "84afa0187d23b7db", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:a8ad79c74797", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8233f9ed-63d2-4726-9bff-472b542ff645"}}
{"id": "9a5b18cc63ce8d0f", "prompt": "I messed up the logic in `Slim/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php`. I want to go back to how it was in the last commit. Can you revert the changes in that file?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9a5b18cc63ce8d0f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:45343539e474", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2fc7a8b7-29cf-4b9a-a07f-e6117c41ef9a"}}
{"id": "6c82f752fee16cc2", "prompt": "I'm getting a caching issue with `FastRouteDispatcher`. After making multiple requests, `getAllowedMethods()` seems to return stale data for specific routes.\n\nCommit `3f42b15` tried to bound the cache size, but I'm seeing `RuntimeException` when the cache hits the limit in a high-throughput environment. The error is:\n\n`RuntimeException: Cache size limit reached for FastRouteDispatcher::getAllowedMethods`\n\nCan you review `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php`? It looks like the LRU cache implementation might be throwing instead of just evicting the least recently used item silently. I need it to handle cache eviction gracefully without stopping the request flow.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6c82f752fee16cc2", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:ca2ac0c0960c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f83949ff-93c9-4e13-9671-bb92ff1efae7"}}
{"id": "3647ae1d4e20f1ce", "prompt": "I'm looking at Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php. How does it actually trigger the ErrorHandler when an exception is thrown during the middleware stack execution?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3647ae1d4e20f1ce", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:82d07b3174a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5764eded-e9d7-4f67-837b-df76fc3248f0"}}
{"id": "fc864f1ab72843b2", "prompt": "I'm looking at the Slim 4 codebase. I see a lot of specialized exception classes in Slim/Exception like HttpBadRequestException, HttpNotFoundException, etc., but they all seem to extend HttpSpecializedException or HttpException. What is the specific benefit of having these separate classes instead of just throwing HttpException with different status codes? Is it mainly for type hinting in catch blocks?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me an example of how I would catch a specific HttpNotFoundException in my route handlers?"}, {"prompt": "How does the ErrorMiddleware use these specific types to generate the correct error responses?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fc864f1ab72843b2", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:ed1a2a869188", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2117740-0902-48ea-952f-1d3156c20ce4"}}
{"id": "c05d0b9b8f5f2fc3", "prompt": "I want to see if we can switch from the current PSR-17 factory provider to a more modern implementation. Can you check what we'd break in Slim/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryProvider.php if we removed the support for older libraries?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c05d0b9b8f5f2fc3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:a83804e61746", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4991446e-4eec-48fa-ba27-94d2e04c32b3"}}
{"id": "0cef96fe986f539e", "prompt": "In `Slim/CallableResolver.php`, the logic for resolving invocable classes and callable strings is getting messy. I want to refactor the resolution strategy to be more declarative.\n\nLook at how `Slim/Interfaces/CallableResolverInterface.php` is defined. Then, update `Slim/CallableResolver.php` to use a single `resolve` method that chains through specific resolvers (e.g., one for invokable classes, one for array callables, one for string callables) rather than one giant `if/elseif` block.\n\nEnsure the public API remains unchanged. I also need to update `tests/CallableResolverTest.php` to cover the new internal structure if it's not already covered by edge cases.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0cef96fe986f539e", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:ebaf018abadf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd163652-4b4e-4605-b59d-e39b4067543e"}}
{"id": "e31f46dfa8657f9b", "prompt": "生成一个临时的、仅限本地使用的 JWT 签名密钥，并打印出来。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "帮我写个脚本，每隔 5 分钟检查一次我的 PHPUnit 测试进程是否还在运行。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e31f46dfa8657f9b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:fe385e9c57d3", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5ebc750d-41e4-4eed-a850-165cff399dea"}}
{"id": "7cd6fb67cf88f84b", "prompt": "Hey, I'm trying to optimize our CI pipeline and I need some stats on the test suite.\n\n1. Count the total number of test files in the `tests/` directory.\n2. Count how many of those are in the `tests/Middleware/` subfolder vs `tests/Routing/`.\n3. Check phpunit.xml.dist and tell me if there's a timeout setting configured for individual tests.\n\nAlso, I noticed some recent commits mention 'intermittent text failure'. Can you check the git blame on `tests/Middleware/OutputBufferingMiddlewareTest.php` to see who last touched it?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Look at the `OutputBufferingMiddlewareTest.php` file and identify the specific test method that's failing intermittently based on the commit messages."}, {"prompt": "Refactor that test to use a more robust expectation checking mechanism."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7cd6fb67cf88f84b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:a78d440590df", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e8a1e741-a45d-4906-95b4-57a129bf3508"}}
{"id": "325fac52afe21ce0", "prompt": "I'm trying to trace where the 'Invalid UTF-8' error handling logic lives. Specifically, I need to know which class or method in `Slim/Error/` is responsible for cleaning up invalid UTF-8 characters in JSON responses. Found this commit 'ddafc0f Substitute invalid UTF-8 in JSON error renderer output'.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the diff for that specific change in that file."}, {"prompt": "Does this logic exist in the PlainText renderer too?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "325fac52afe21ce0", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:2bb7a7ae8331", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c51f393b-cd31-46c4-abb3-e6e407daa144"}}
{"id": "ed20c5fc9be90109", "prompt": "Es gibt Berichte über Probleme bei der PSR-17 Factory Autodetection. Bitte führe eine umfassende Untersuchung durch:\n1. Prüfe `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\Psr17FactoryProvider`, ob alle gängigen Implementierungen (Nyholm, Laminas, Guzzle) korrekt erkannt werden.\n2. Stelle sicher, dass der `Nyholm PSR17 factory` Support in `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17` vollständig ist (siehe Commit 8dea5df).\n3. Überprüfe `tests/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryProviderTest.php` auf Vollständigkeit.\nWenn du Fehler findest, korrigiere sie direkt im Code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ed20c5fc9be90109", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:0171e8568cb0", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea081712-b458-42d1-9483-ea2681cb4c98"}}
{"id": "dbffbc63412ffac7", "prompt": "The error message in `Slim/Exception/HttpTooManyRequestsException.php` is a bit too brief. Can you update the default message to be more descriptive for the user?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dbffbc63412ffac7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:c4bb04706a72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31a40d91-cad4-4c75-8f1f-8e51b700523c"}}
{"id": "e5b40894d3678731", "prompt": "I'm trying to track down where the HTTP status code is actually set when HttpNotFoundException is thrown. Find the file where this exception is handled and the specific line that sets the response status.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e5b40894d3678731", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:9c36641c966b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "58e59c3e-a376-4da5-91dc-efffb04fcf02"}}
{"id": "654200b2e3d16a97", "prompt": "I'm seeing that Slim 4 uses `AppFactory::create()` but I noticed there are separate factories for PSR-17 like `GuzzlePsr17Factory` and `NyholmPsr17Factory`. How does the framework currently decide which PSR-7 implementation to use if I don't explicitly configure one? Is there a priority order?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me how to disable the automatic detection of Slim-Http decorators if I'm using a different PSR-7 implementation?"}, {"prompt": "Where in the codebase is the logic for determining which PSR-17 factory to instantiate located?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "654200b2e3d16a97", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:4a416ff21355", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29080022-a4a9-4fb8-a91f-62c390240347"}}
{"id": "ad15904db91d0833", "prompt": "I'm looking at the Error/Renderers directory. It seems Slim 4 handles error rendering quite flexibly. How do I implement a custom error renderer that outputs an XML response instead of JSON for API errors, while keeping the default HTML renderer for web requests?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ad15904db91d0833", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:32b64182e493", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9b3d01af-9db4-4ce2-b005-de47aac4ec19"}}
{"id": "cb7e2b3f65fe2eea", "prompt": "The `ErrorHandler` is caching the Content-Type negotiation result incorrectly. If I send a request with `Accept: application/json` and then another with `Accept: text/html`, the second request incorrectly returns JSON because the cached content type from the first request is being reused.\n\nSee commit `943e4b6` which says \"Negotiate error handler content type on every request\". However, looking at `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php`, the negotiation logic inside `determineContentType` seems to be stored in a property that isn't reset between requests in the middleware stack.\n\nPlease fix `ErrorHandler.php` to ensure content type negotiation happens fresh for every request and isn't cached across requests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cb7e2b3f65fe2eea", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:ff6bbccacde2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf84908f-d6fa-4e70-b7c1-4c978239d14b"}}
{"id": "1ccb92c475dbf50b", "prompt": "tests/Mocks/MockPsr17Factory.php がどのような目的で作られているのか、他のテストと比較して教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1ccb92c475dbf50b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:ca808776c7e4", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7bad1161-0b0e-4983-8fde-a3007795acda"}}
{"id": "a9f3b8d648f4cace", "prompt": "where is the allowed methods cache being bound in FastRouteDispatcher?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a9f3b8d648f4cace", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:5904d5dbcd85", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec141f2b-803e-45c6-8cd2-4734fc199b2e"}}
{"id": "6b2ec051619cc0c1", "prompt": "In `Slim/Routing/Route.php`, the `runCallable` method seems to be double-decoding route arguments in some middleware chains. Commit 417c189 mentions stopping this, but my tests for `RequestResponseNamedArgs` are still failing with decoded strings appearing twice in the arguments array.\n\nCan you check the call flow in `Slim/Handlers/Strategies/RequestResponseNamedArgs.php` and ensure the arguments extracted from the route match are not already decoded when passed to the callable? I'm seeing this error:\n\n`TypeError: trim(): Argument #1 ($string) must be of type string, array given`\n\nTrace shows it's coming from my handler receiving an array instead of a string.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6b2ec051619cc0c1", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:a70370d43876", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f697dce-d41f-4b63-8b4b-4e13d5bb25e8"}}
{"id": "28c0dafb7522e714", "prompt": "Bitte führe die statische Codeanalyse mit phpstan aus und zeig mir die Ergebnisse.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "28c0dafb7522e714", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:ae630e8c7081", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "46e758d2-cc88-4107-bd27-9d3ded9a611d"}}
{"id": "8a9017e476382c15", "prompt": "Change the type hint for the $request parameter in Slim\\Middleware\\RoutingMiddleware::process to use Slim\\Interfaces\\Psr7\\RequestInterface instead of just PSR-7, and make sure it's consistent with the rest of the middleware.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, now create a new branch called 'fix/routing-middleware-typehint' and commit this change with a descriptive message."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8a9017e476382c15", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:518a71049fc0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8e15c20e-47fc-4fa4-9aa1-c0fadcac2dde"}}
{"id": "275aa3b43fa02b3d", "prompt": "I'm refactoring the error handling flow and want to move the content-type negotiation logic out of the individual renderers. Can you update Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php, Slim/Error/Renderers/HtmlErrorRenderer.php, Slim/Error/Renderers/PlainTextErrorRenderer.php, and Slim/Error/Renderers/XmlErrorRenderer.php to remove the internal content-type guessing and instead rely on the ErrorHandler setting the correct header before calling render? Just keep the logic in the renderers minimal.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "275aa3b43fa02b3d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:bcef42edb60b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7623eff2-1911-4d32-ba3d-e86d3355f744"}}
{"id": "544fe5ea3a04f02c", "prompt": "Check git blame on Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php around line 50.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "544fe5ea3a04f02c", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:b8c652d7a417", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "193bfce1-e32b-4941-a90c-e185b272974f"}}
{"id": "ab37e7eada427061", "prompt": "I noticed we're still on an older version of Guzzle. Can you check composer.json and see if we can upgrade to the latest version? If so, run the tests to see if it breaks any of the PSR-17 factory implementations, specifically Slim/Factory/Psr17/GuzzlePsr17Factory.php.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ab37e7eada427061", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:138c88b806cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99203cc6-fc78-4168-adbc-6ec4f56fc49a"}}
{"id": "7ed9721c7540c5fc", "prompt": "Hi, ich bekomme beim Ausführen der Tests einen Fehler. Sieht so aus, als ob die Testausführung abbricht, bevor alle Tests durchgelaufen sind. Hier ist der Output:\n\n```bash\n$ ./vendor/bin/phpunit\n...\nTests: 1, Assertions: 1, Failures: 1.\n```\n\nKannst du mir helfen, das Problem zu finden?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Welche spezifische Testdatei oder welche Tests sind betroffen?"}, {"prompt": "Kannst du die betroffenen Tests im Detail debuggen?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ed9721c7540c5fc", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:7e7f8aa66890", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "531765d9-513e-4409-bcd7-fa6486a3db56"}}
{"id": "8cb88ee71617a18f", "prompt": "Can you look at my current uncommitted changes across the `Slim/Exception/` directory and split them into two logical commits? One for the new exception types and one for the factory updates. Make sure the commit messages follow the project style.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8cb88ee71617a18f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:bc6130c187e2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "54cc76ed-8f4e-40da-84ed-9201e764ff4c"}}
{"id": "31bec19fa8cd32ea", "prompt": "Why is `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler` sending a Content-Type header on every request even when I call `forceContentType(null)`?\n\nIt seems like the content type negotiation isn't resetting properly between requests. I want it to fall back to negotiation if I explicitly clear it. Check the logic in `determineContentType` and `handleException`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "31bec19fa8cd32ea", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:9a7a7dd191bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8190c3ed-3480-435d-be67-2233053e18d4"}}
{"id": "2218453dc946c2e9", "prompt": "Look at `.coveralls.yml`. What is the service name and repo token placeholder? Does `phpunit.xml.dist` have `coverage_clover` and `coverage_json` paths defined that align with Coveralls expectations?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2218453dc946c2e9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:c16d0ba07095", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e872e048-9fb9-4fa4-b2f5-aed2645de0ee"}}
{"id": "6463f5f31aa2a07c", "prompt": "Run phpstan and phpcs on the Slim directory and fix any errors. If there are style fixes available via phpcbf, run that too.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6463f5f31aa2a07c", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:d4af62326eec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9da1cf6b-fac3-4a45-99d1-a4f4595d0b8a"}}
{"id": "0e4c13563a54dff2", "prompt": "In `Slim/CallableResolver.php`, when resolving a callable like `UserController::index($request, $response, $args)`, it seems we are decoding route arguments twice in some cases.\n\nCommit `417c189` says \"Stop decoding route arguments twice\". Make sure that `resolve()` and the strategies in `Slim/Handlers/Strategies/` are consistent. If the args are already decoded, don't decode them again in `RequestResponseNamedArgs`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e4c13563a54dff2", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:d884f6b7b6bb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fadb4092-ea00-4d66-b814-76ab80a68116"}}
{"id": "ed2c0263f85fa30f", "prompt": "I need to know where `FastRouteDispatcher::getAllowedMethods()` caches its results. The recent commit mentions fixing a cache size issue here. Show me the relevant code in `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What is the default cache size constant or magic number used?"}, {"prompt": "Find the commit hash that fixed the bound allowed methods cache."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ed2c0263f85fa30f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:730baee24895", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dfcd1ae8-9cba-4fe1-ace1-fe22d6c837ee"}}
{"id": "33da55c9f1e9c3c2", "prompt": "Create a high-level architectural diagram in Markdown format (using Mermaid) for the README. I want to show how a request flows through Slim: from the ServerRequestCreator, through the Middleware stack (like RoutingMiddleware and ErrorMiddleware), to the Dispatcher, and finally to the Route handler.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "33da55c9f1e9c3c2", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:1cb739ca6701", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fab497ff-c4d5-4761-b2ed-abfc4da4c1b6"}}
{"id": "da0c5b4a7d02a4e6", "prompt": "Refactor `Slim\\Error\\Renderers\\JsonErrorRenderer.php` to rename the internal method `render` to `renderJson` for better clarity, and update all calls within that class.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "da0c5b4a7d02a4e6", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:5f53eb6cab49", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50ca2588-455e-43eb-b9b7-290307925666"}}
{"id": "910745fe27256409", "prompt": "In the recent commit `417c189 Stop decoding route arguments twice`, it looks like there was an optimization in how route arguments are handled. Can you explain the issue that was being caused by decoding arguments twice and how the fix in `RequestHandler` or related strategy classes addresses it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "910745fe27256409", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:998da4e8058c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "431089be-ad90-41e1-8057-244e8bdc8a24"}}
{"id": "40036e4e413ae087", "prompt": "I noticed `Slim/Handlers/Strategies` contains RequestHandler, RequestResponse, and RequestResponseNamedArgs. My PSR-15 `RequestHandlerInterface` implementations only need one `handle` method. Why does Slim provide these different strategies for route invocation? When should I use RequestResponseNamedArgs versus the default strategy?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40036e4e413ae087", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:974b2298eca5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42dc4293-994c-4a5a-a1a1-a3c0ce17e6fd"}}
{"id": "1b8205b990148ef0", "prompt": "Can you look at my uncommitted changes in `tests/Routing/RouteResolverTest.php`? If they look okay, just commit them directly to the current branch.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b8205b990148ef0", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:58b0127d8ce8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "897c883f-c18e-4241-9f4e-eb1354409bcd"}}
{"id": "a1f3331401051d7b", "prompt": "I'm seeing intermittent test failures in CI. Can you check the current status of the Slim Framework status page (if one exists) or their Twitter account for any recent outages? Also, check the live GitHub Actions run for the main branch of slimphp/Slim to see if the 'tests.yml' workflow is currently passing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a1f3331401051d7b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:d417a546d839", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2cb0c5fb-2257-458d-86ac-99310a38e54a"}}
{"id": "3d09b0058b81f155", "prompt": "The error message in `Slim\\Exception\\HttpForbiddenException.php` is too generic. Change the default message to 'Access to this resource is forbidden.'", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3d09b0058b81f155", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:14b2e4e52e0c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "416921a3-bf89-4e11-bc1c-7dd2844aa2af"}}
{"id": "01e1a2dd79dff5d1", "prompt": "I've been messing around with Slim\\Factory\\AppFactory.php to try and add some custom logic for auto-detection of PSR-17 factories, but it's a mess. Can you look at my uncommitted changes, organize them into a clean commit that only includes the necessary factory improvements, and then push it to a new branch called 'feature/enhanced-factory-detection'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "01e1a2dd79dff5d1", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:9a8b4208ee90", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "957a91aa-ee7a-4ed1-89ed-16e4b009efdb"}}
{"id": "01ac6e291c907e0f", "prompt": "Can you check the Laminas Diactoros documentation for how they handle stream resource leaks? I'm seeing a warning in our logs about stream closure in the ErrorMiddleware, and I need to see if there's a known migration path or bug fix in their latest release.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is `GuzzlePsr17Factory` more robust with stream handling than `LaminasDiactorosPsr17Factory`?"}, {"prompt": "Does Slim's `AbstractErrorRenderer` handle stream disposal automatically?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "01ac6e291c907e0f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:b550c882c1c6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a03a85ec-e94e-45d0-b4b4-ebe877f8f6d3"}}
{"id": "9ecbc274c3833e89", "prompt": "Starte bitte die lokale Entwicklungsumgebung mit Xdebug aktiviert, damit ich die App live debuggen kann.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9ecbc274c3833e89", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:63adaba2b7c8", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4b56a274-5744-49bc-b17d-2e9d447dfd21"}}
{"id": "5553a6bd65328d8f", "prompt": "I'm trying to trace how the error handler determines the content type for the response. Specifically, look at Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php. Where is the logic that negotiates the content type, and which files call or configure the ErrorRendererInterface implementations?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5553a6bd65328d8f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:77f3be2a85fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f077090e-3af4-4643-9266-077bbef65508"}}
{"id": "ea57b38245a12208", "prompt": "Can you move `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\SlimHttpServerRequestCreator.php` to `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\Server\\SlimHttpServerRequestCreator.php`? Don't forget to update the namespace and any references in the tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ea57b38245a12208", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:2ec7db699db2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f1880eb-1611-4741-8e6d-8cc08b9b2640"}}
{"id": "cf4a0c9efa3835dc", "prompt": "Run the test suite using the composer script defined in composer.json. If it fails, paste the error output below and help me debug.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, that failed. Here is the stack trace: [paste stack trace]. It seems related to Slim/ErrorHandler. Can you take a look?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf4a0c9efa3835dc", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:1357780bdd28", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8648b531-81a1-4839-9ff5-d6521278e161"}}
{"id": "9beb3dcb7746d225", "prompt": "The error message says 'Invalid UTF-8 sequence in JSON error renderer'. I saw this in the recent commits (ddafc0f). What does the official Slim docs say about handling non-UTF8 input streams in the BodyParsingMiddleware? Do I need to configure a specific decoder?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9beb3dcb7746d225", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:50fc82d9a6f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c5f7de9c-24c5-4f4a-ab7f-c068510077d8"}}
{"id": "09c0069ea4291596", "prompt": "I'm seeing intermittent test failures in `ErrorHandlerTest`. The error message is 'content-type caching'. Can you tell me which test method in `tests/Handlers/ErrorHandlerTest.php` is specifically checking for the restoration of negotiation when `forceContentType(null)` is called? I saw commit `3bce00d` references this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "09c0069ea4291596", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:1237cddcd9a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02111f6f-6615-483f-916b-bfe1fa6da14a"}}
{"id": "f7e1dde9bd4a1455", "prompt": "Corre el linter phpcs sobre los cambios en Slim/MiddlewareDispatcher.php y dime si hay violaciones de estilo en la línea 45.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Corrige el error de indentación que mencionaste."}, {"prompt": "¿Y ahora pasa phpstan sin warnings?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f7e1dde9bd4a1455", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:82ca1f41cb47", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3dbf3da8-fde5-48de-8525-4f9c30d325d2"}}
{"id": "2b61e12d138d5d0f", "prompt": "Find all usages of `Psr17FactoryProvider`. I want to see how the PSR-17 factories are resolved by default. Which file instantiates or references it first?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2b61e12d138d5d0f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:ccd7290ff583", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7455974e-275b-4aa0-8dc3-75e0015a7a1a"}}
{"id": "45aa3bde721083a4", "prompt": "Ich brauche ein großes Refactoring für die Error-Handling-Suite. Bitte kümmere dich um folgende drei Punkte:\n1. Überprüfe die `Slim\\Error\\Renderers\\JsonErrorRenderer` auf die korrekte Behandlung von invalidem UTF-8 (wir müssen sicherstellen, dass es nicht zu Fehlern kommt, wie im letzten Commit erwähnt).\n2. Schau dir `Slim\\Handlers\\ErrorHandler` an und stelle sicher, dass die Content-Type-Negotiation bei jedem Request sauber funktioniert und nicht fälschlicherweise gecached wird.\n3. Aktualisiere die entsprechenden Unit-Tests in `tests/Error/` und `tests/Handlers/`, damit sie die neuen Verhaltensweisen abdecken.\nGib mir Bescheid, wenn die Implementierung steht, bevor du die Tests laufen lässt.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "45aa3bde721083a4", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:3df892790b92", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48b2f364-4df1-4dee-b08d-da6cdb53f6f3"}}
{"id": "c22fc0a95e224889", "prompt": "帮我开一个交互式的终端会话，我要进去跑几条测试命令。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c22fc0a95e224889", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:a30ce65de0de", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f9aaf048-4b02-4de4-bab1-a7cfdcd02fff"}}
{"id": "a23a6302c816c71a", "prompt": "Rename `Slim\factory\narrow_factory` to `Slim\factory\refined_factory` throughout the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a23a6302c816c71a", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:d669e2ab08c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f2162b10-6b95-4e21-ac0f-e03660939acf"}}
{"id": "a68adae1166156b4", "prompt": "I'm halfway through refactoring `Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php` and my current state is a mess. Stash these changes so I can pull the latest updates from main.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a68adae1166156b4", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:3dff847fdf00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08753e42-cb5e-41f8-ba1f-68d9bb88d326"}}
{"id": "edae08f85cfb4cdd", "prompt": "The .gitignore is getting messy. Please clean up build artifacts. I'm seeing stale files in vendor/ and some IDE config files that shouldn't be tracked. Just add the necessary rules, don't delete anything manually.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "edae08f85cfb4cdd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:3f585587e071", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f816127d-0b65-4297-9640-42828d3a87f1"}}
{"id": "dabe182a162990bd", "prompt": "Bump the version number in composer.json. It looks like we're moving from 4.10.0 to 4.11.0 based on the recent commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dabe182a162990bd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:728e37d8c6bf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42a3675a-0971-4c34-97e2-e783c74b6dda"}}
{"id": "593dcdd82560c8d5", "prompt": "I need to implement a custom error renderer. Looking at Slim/Interfaces/ErrorRendererInterface.php, what is the expected return type and how should it handle different content types like JSON or XML?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "593dcdd82560c8d5", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:c53f297145dd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cdf09f6c-1637-4b72-a1ab-22e601b5729f"}}
{"id": "f6b575183e9e9352", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weirdness in how error messages are being handled. Can you add a new exception class `Slim\\Exception\\HttpConflictException` that extends `HttpException`? Make sure to add it to the file structure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f6b575183e9e9352", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:70f623075003", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9e1907ad-a989-4d95-86bd-e37c15dce288"}}
{"id": "fa79b54c9cc28f36", "prompt": "There's a new local configuration file I want to ignore: .env.local. Please add it to .gitignore.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fa79b54c9cc28f36", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:e0d0c36bc504", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "008a4591-a36c-4461-bc28-03a1c23dfbf8"}}
{"id": "a58c25844216be97", "prompt": "Can you draft a new entry for CHANGELOG.md regarding the recent fixes in the JSON error renderer? We specifically added support for substituting invalid UTF-8 characters to prevent rendering failures.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a58c25844216be97", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:e3f6b3b8f42b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f2c6316-e233-4148-a822-bb6b718c3073"}}
{"id": "051f1390472a4b11", "prompt": "Review de sécurité sur le Routing : Je veux m'assurer que `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php` et `Slim/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php` ne permettent pas d'échappement de contexte ou d'attaques par injection de méthode HTTP. Y a-t-il des vérifications suffisantes sur les méthodes autorisées (GET, POST, etc.) avant d'exécuter le routeur ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "051f1390472a4b11", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:6b8c9d26accb", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c2f157ae-7ad4-4d09-a98b-afb202aaa500"}}
{"id": "0d8193fc7b45b7d9", "prompt": "Can you explain how the route argument decoding works in Slim/Routing/RouteResolver.php? I saw a commit recently about stopping double decoding and want to understand the current flow.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d8193fc7b45b7d9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:b78b900647c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6363adf2-26aa-43c2-b30c-8a274efc4550"}}
{"id": "131431a58bc74706", "prompt": "Can you check if the latest version of FastRoute is compatible with Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php? Run the tests in tests/Routing/FastRouteDispatcherTest.php after checking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "131431a58bc74706", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:ec80a310da8d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d0de6ae5-1107-45c2-ada9-a94ec4c05594"}}
{"id": "b20d9a7bcde4d886", "prompt": "The current implementation of `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php` is missing some type hints I added manually. Can you clean up the type hints to match the interfaces in `Slim/Interfaces/ErrorHandlerInterface.php`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Perfect. Commit that into the current branch."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b20d9a7bcde4d886", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:69a17589b98d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "932600fe-450e-4cdd-a247-894ea4cefe08"}}
{"id": "5dbbb4f351fddc02", "prompt": "The `JsonErrorRenderer` is choking on invalid UTF-8 sequences in exception messages. When an exception contains a malformed character, `json_encode` returns false and the renderer crashes or outputs garbage.\n\nSee PR #3465/commit `ddafc0f`. It looks like there's a fix for substituting invalid UTF-8, but the current implementation in `Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php` doesn't seem to be checking `json_last_error()` after encoding. \n\nPlease update `JsonErrorRenderer::render` to handle `JSON_ERROR_UTF8` by re-encoding after stripping invalid sequences, similar to how `HtmlErrorRenderer` might handle it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5dbbb4f351fddc02", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:47354f47a2c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98fdc7d7-d1f4-44c8-9e94-3dbadd3cde9a"}}
{"id": "dc38fac6af01dee9", "prompt": "Hey, can you show me the full hierarchy of exceptions extending HttpException? I want to make sure I'm catching them correctly in my ErrorHandler.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc38fac6af01dee9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:de5f45d54273", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a089390b-4529-42eb-83c5-f342a2997948"}}
{"id": "6615c7803e1d1c69", "prompt": "where's the logic that parses the body? I need to see how `BodyParsingMiddleware` extracts JSON vs form data.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the unit tests for `BodyParsingMiddleware`."}, {"prompt": "Are there any other middleware classes in `Slim\\Middleware` that modify the request body?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6615c7803e1d1c69", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:fde475e51b88", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7f48310-eb57-4f7a-8334-46c309a8ae51"}}
{"id": "cc49dbae4410e349", "prompt": "List all files under `Slim/Factory/Psr17/` that implement or extend the base Psr17 factory concepts. I want to see which PSR-7 server/HTTP implementations are supported out of the box without extra config.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Which one is the default if nothing is specified?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cc49dbae4410e349", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:66fa13bd3ccd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3ad384ac-f5d0-4f87-9783-78282f8a0587"}}
{"id": "30dcfc9cc5401a99", "prompt": "Peux-tu analyser `Slim\\Exception\\HttpException.php` ? Je veux savoir comment on définit le code de statut HTTP spécifique pour chaque exception.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Est-ce que `HttpNotFoundException` étend bien cette classe ?"}, {"prompt": "Comment l'erreur est renvoyée au client via le renderer ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "30dcfc9cc5401a99", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:3d2c60421cfb", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81914515-5949-4a9a-80f3-b59222562cfe"}}
{"id": "ced4379102b1440f", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in the Slim/ directory. I want to see if there's any low-hanging fruit for a quick win feature or bug fix.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the TODOs in Routing/, are they related to the new RouteResolver implementation?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ced4379102b1440f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:848be2335deb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "55b093cf-547a-4f03-81cf-967487dd0548"}}
{"id": "24e5df71a40a9b4e", "prompt": "Start the built-in PHP server for the Slim app using the example in the README so I can manually test the /hello endpoint. Keep the process running in the background so I can run curl commands against it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "24e5df71a40a9b4e", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:9f764555ae4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b649296c-08fa-4a36-8cef-80baeffa68c5"}}
{"id": "a81d01f428655ac7", "prompt": "Kannst du prüfen, ob die Änderungen aus Commit 3f42b15 (Caching in FastRouteDispatcher) die Performance signifikant verbessern? Bitte führe einen kurzen Benchmark aus.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Vergleiche das Ergebnis mit dem vorherigen Stand vor dem Commit."}, {"prompt": "Gibt es dabei Regressions bei den Unit-Tests?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a81d01f428655ac7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:7c9ff6100fc3", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0de09ef2-2b0d-4660-9263-585528832a10"}}
{"id": "41fb548a1a13ac3b", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/Middleware/ErrorMiddlewareTest.php` that verifies the middleware correctly handles a custom exception being thrown from a route.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "41fb548a1a13ac3b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:13bfe615a367", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6f5060f0-b11b-4b6a-9fc8-7417728c4b51"}}
{"id": "8483c05c973f9970", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of manual instantiation of exceptions in Slim/Exception/HttpSpecializedException.php and its children. It's hard to maintain. Can you refactor the base HttpException and HttpSpecializedException classes to use a factory pattern for generating the HTTP status codes and messages, so the specialized exceptions don't need to repeat the constructor logic?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the factory in Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php if needed to support this new exception creation flow."}, {"prompt": "Run `composer test tests/Exception/`"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8483c05c973f9970", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:152dd3adf46e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ca5c5611-f655-4ecf-9f88-caf1a9611b53"}}
{"id": "90298d9d9e50c3d5", "prompt": "Check `phpunit.xml.dist` and tell me what version of PHPUnit is configured as the minimum. Also, look at `composer.json` and verify if the `phpunit/phpunit` version matches.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "90298d9d9e50c3d5", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:9c06be184136", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "040a6e13-a8d9-47ba-bb22-9616e8af0175"}}
{"id": "5f5d5a190d5e4027", "prompt": "Check if upgrading to PHP 8.3 would break anything. Specifically, look at how we handle the Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php and see if there are any changes in how exceptions are caught or handled compared to PHP 8.2.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "We need to update the CI config to include PHP 8.3 in the test matrix."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5f5d5a190d5e4027", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:de072ca71bb9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b37843dd-7301-4d8a-a320-ff4a43962b74"}}
{"id": "8c8c7c6b47b65308", "prompt": "Hey, just pushed a commit to fix the JSON error renderer handling invalid UTF-8 (commit df43a99). Can you verify that `tests/Error/AbstractErrorRendererTest.php` passes now and that the new assertions for non-UTF8 strings are working as expected?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8c8c7c6b47b65308", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:9c261e1f4afc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a537435-11f1-4c72-969c-582ec24c510c"}}
{"id": "03faf42c6ec15c48", "prompt": "Slim\\Error\\Renderers\\JsonErrorRenderer.php で、無効な UTF-8 文字列がどのように処理されているかコードを確認して教えてください。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "以前のコミットで修正が入ったようですが、具体的にどのように置換しているのですか？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "03faf42c6ec15c48", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:b4e9ee9963ef", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad6c40c2-b4e0-4388-a363-94f857b16349"}}
{"id": "a1d7f253bb084053", "prompt": "Hallo, kann ich den Fehler mit ungültigen UTF-8-Zeichen in der JSON-Fehlerausgabe reproduzieren? Ich habe gesehen, dass es dazu einen Commit 8e77282 gab. Bitte führe den entsprechenden Test aus, um sicherzustellen, dass er jetzt grün ist.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a1d7f253bb084053", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:3ec0d72302c1", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26f34a67-cad1-4a57-8c00-aaf2580c8b76"}}
{"id": "8a79c2346122311e", "prompt": "I'm seeing some performance concerns in high-concurrency environments related to routing. I need three investigations done:\n1. Analyze `Slim\\Routing\\FastRouteDispatcher` and check if we are caching `getAllowedMethods()` too aggressively or if it's causing issues with method-specific logic. Reference the logic in commit `df489a9`.\n2. Look at `Slim\\Routing\\RouteCollector` and see if we can optimize the way route arguments are being decoded to avoid the double-decoding issue mentioned in `417c189`.\n3. Profile `Slim\\Middleware\\RoutingMiddleware` to see if the overhead of the middleware stack is growing linearly with the number of route groups.\n\nReport back with benchmarks or suspected bottleneck files.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `tests/Routing/FastRouteDispatcherTest.php` to see if we have coverage for the allowed methods edge cases."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8a79c2346122311e", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:651d3db7aab8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4524028-4e64-44ed-ba3c-73ee63d56af1"}}
{"id": "21e93e96f46f26ec", "prompt": "How does AppFactory::create() determine which PSR-17 implementation to use automatically? Point me to the logic in Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "21e93e96f46f26ec", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:104fd102ac1d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3397d628-b519-4a7a-881f-fa7aa2aceb5e"}}
{"id": "f5c39baf303f91ea", "prompt": "查一下 FastRoute 的最新稳定版本是多少，以及它在 Slim 4 的 composer.json 里是如何约束的？我听说 FastRoute 最近有个 bug 修复了路由缓存大小限制，Slim 是否需要更新依赖版本来支持这个修复？去 Packagist 或者 FastRoute 的 GitHub Releases 页面看看。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f5c39baf303f91ea", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:5d2dc6148814", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1f7ecab-ea91-40b2-8319-1ec3b936f346"}}
{"id": "e9f7d7989c4357cd", "prompt": "I need to release 4.1.0. Bump the version number in composer.json and update the CHANGELOG.md to reflect the 4.0.x stability fixes from the last few weeks. Don't commit, just show me the changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9f7d7989c4357cd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:4a2e990e0e89", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d85d8da-a39e-4365-af75-6958a8ed2f34"}}
{"id": "fdf67569d0152c73", "prompt": "We need to improve our PSR-17 factory support. Please perform the following updates:\n1. Update `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\NyholmPsr17Factory` to ensure it is fully compatible with the latest Nyholm releases, specifically checking for missing stream factory methods.\n2. Review `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\ServerRequestCreator` and ensure that auto-detection of `Slim-Http` decorators is working as described in the README.\n3. Add new test cases to `tests/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryTest.php` to cover the edge cases where a PSR-17 implementation might be missing a specific factory method.\n\nMake sure to follow the patterns in `tests/Mocks/MockPsr17Factory.php` for the new tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fdf67569d0152c73", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:d51620c6632e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7f6f5fd-1536-4f00-b9e5-907f746fa78b"}}
{"id": "55f34fadc304fb78", "prompt": "in FastRouteDispatcher, where is the allowed methods cache being updated? I suspect the caching logic in getAllowedMethods is causing stale data issues.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a way to clear this cache manually?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the code for commit 3f42b15."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "55f34fadc304fb78", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:2f46e5307d53", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2ef2b85d-f602-49c4-b418-fc2565798cd1"}}
{"id": "6da0445eed3e77d1", "prompt": "where is BodyParsingMiddleware used?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6da0445eed3e77d1", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:5dedf056888c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "74ac164c-505f-4200-8d98-910dd30041a8"}}
{"id": "72b54b3d0d9a3c7c", "prompt": "Slim\\Middleware\\RoutingMiddleware の役割と、それがどのようにして Slim\\Routing\\RouteResolver と連携しているのか説明してください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "72b54b3d0d9a3c7c", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:e708b1b45de6", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3f11dbd8-01da-41cf-8aff-e1b615fbd69d"}}
{"id": "a980902504ca6676", "prompt": "I need to update the README.md. Please add a small section under 'Installation' explaining that Slim requires a PSR-7 implementation and briefly list the ones mentioned in the current text (Slim-Psr7, HttpSoft, Nyholm, Guzzle, and Laminas).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a980902504ca6676", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:6db20d5c7825", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f339fcf0-5a8e-4226-a81d-bf9949d49cc7"}}
{"id": "9abd59fc43e926ed", "prompt": "Find all places where Psr17FactoryProvider is instantiated or called. Specifically, I need to know if ServerRequestCreatorFactory uses it directly or through another factory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9abd59fc43e926ed", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:aa1d575b5640", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "de930159-197b-48de-a4c1-a9abcf0cc8c1"}}
{"id": "97ada07cca85c428", "prompt": "I'm not happy with how I handled the routing logic in the last commit. Can you revert the last commit and let me start over with the `Slim/Routing/RouteResolver.php` changes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "97ada07cca85c428", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:b640e1b1423a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e045be86-2238-4410-9d36-2f5df643cf5e"}}
{"id": "2e9754e9d4d55614", "prompt": "We are preparing for a minor release. Please write a draft of release notes that summarizes the recent merged PRs, specifically focusing on the fixes for the ErrorHandler content-type caching and the FastRouteDispatcher allowed methods cache.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Include a 'Bug Fixes' section vs a 'Performance' section."}, {"prompt": "Please check the recent commits to make sure I didn't miss any significant security or stability fixes."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2e9754e9d4d55614", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:12353258cb92", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04225abb-4fc4-4560-a22f-a85550e328c7"}}
{"id": "9ebefae4edd5ac4d", "prompt": "Hey, I noticed that Slim/Handlers/Strategies/RequestHandler.php, RequestResponse.php, RequestResponseArgs.php, and RequestResponseNamedArgs.php all have very similar logic for invoking callables. Can you refactor these to share a common base implementation or use a strategy pattern that reduces code duplication? I'm seeing the same argument parsing logic repeated in at least 3 files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9ebefae4edd5ac4d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:a995947ec781", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9d6581e5-00c0-4ea5-9bd9-f45e13307a99"}}
{"id": "b1a9199e24b6f805", "prompt": "The codebase is getting a bit cluttered with old test mocks. I want to do a cleanup:\n1. Consolidate the various mock classes in `tests/Mocks/` into a more coherent structure if possible, or at least ensure they aren't duplicating logic (e.g., compare `MockMiddlewareSlimCallable.php` with `MockMiddlewareWithConstructor.php`).\n2. Update `tests/TestCase.php` to include common setup helpers used by almost all the middleware tests.\n3. Run `phpcs.xml.dist` and `phpstan.neon.dist` across the entire `tests/` directory and fix any violations that appear in the output.\n\nDon't change any production code in `Slim/`, only touch `tests/` and the config files.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b1a9199e24b6f805", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:355e31239d22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d742cd5-bc02-48ac-80ff-cdbf749787f5"}}
{"id": "aa9044e5aea8a17b", "prompt": "In `Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php`, find the method that handles the response body. Is there any logic specifically for handling invalid UTF-8 characters? Quote the relevant line numbers.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "aa9044e5aea8a17b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:0b2b1ada68a0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "debd5784-ec84-49ef-9b9c-d3c4dbf0598b"}}
{"id": "a7af728b0f7b33e7", "prompt": "I'm getting a `JsonException: Invalid UTF-8 in path string` when Slim's JsonErrorRenderer tries to encode an exception message that contains binary data or malformed UTF-8.\n\nStack trace snippet:\n```\nJsonException: Invalid UTF-8 in path string\n...\nSlim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php:34\n...\n```\n\nLooks like we need to sanitize the strings before json_encode-ing them. Can you fix `Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php` to handle this gracefully?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7af728b0f7b33e7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:aaac1d40a2f0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "161267d0-ab67-4506-a8ad-4b0ce913b349"}}
{"id": "63d82ccc88ee862c", "prompt": "Ich brauche eine Übersicht darüber, welche Middleware-Klassen aktuell implementiert sind. Bitte liste alle Dateien im Verzeichnis Slim/Middleware auf und gib eine kurze Beschreibung jeder Middleware an.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63d82ccc88ee862c", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:38accd8d5a65", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "05ceedd1-3742-4a75-b3ae-0c9a29146d63"}}
{"id": "d300cd0343bb112b", "prompt": "I need to disable Slim-Http automatic detection in my setup because I'm using a custom PSR-17 factory that returns objects incompatible with the default decorators. \n\nIn `AppFactory.php`, the `create` method calls `detectSlimHttp` which crashes because my custom factory doesn't implement the expected interface.\n\nCan you add a static setter `setSlimHttpDecoratorsAutomaticDetection(false)` to both `AppFactory` and `ServerRequestCreatorFactory`? The README mentions this API exists, but looking at the codebase, I don't see the setter implementation in `Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php` or `Slim/Factory/ServerRequestCreatorFactory.php`.\n\nIt seems like these are stubbed out or missing entirely.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d300cd0343bb112b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:4b45f9be58d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c041b41e-308e-4019-b3d8-4dfb30fc8a29"}}
{"id": "b03f60b82d7b6238", "prompt": "List all branches that have been merged into 4.x recently.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b03f60b82d7b6238", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:ff9cffbb4a98", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "df7abfdb-94b3-4d56-ac63-e29e538b6ab9"}}
{"id": "80e37773a86b721d", "prompt": "In `Slim/Factory/Psr17FactoryProvider` and the various `Psr17Factory` implementations (like `GuzzlePsr17Factory`, `NyholmPsr17Factory`), how does the automatic detection work exactly? I want to know if it checks for class existence or just looks at composer dependencies, and if I want to force a specific factory, do I need to manually instantiate everything or is there a helper method?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "80e37773a86b721d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:cf40a8bfe484", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a3604e2-0402-415d-b8a1-eeda2cdf2359"}}
{"id": "566fac48fbc15549", "prompt": "J'ai reçu un rapport de sécurité sur Slim Framework. Peux-tu examiner le fichier `Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php` pour vérifier s'il y a des failles liées à l'injection de JSON ou à la gestion de chaînes UTF-8 invalides ? Je me souviens qu'il y a eu des commits récents sur le sujet (df489a9, ddafc0f).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "566fac48fbc15549", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:74944e1dd893", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "66df27e4-78c7-4bcd-9e3c-1e41da66f7d2"}}
{"id": "c482d4a769b7fdb5", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the difference between RequestHandler and RequestResponse strategies in Slim 4. Can you link me to the part of the official docs that explains when to use `RequestResponseNamedArgs` vs `RequestResponseArgs`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the `AdvancedCallableResolverInterface` change how these strategies are resolved?"}, {"prompt": "Are there performance benchmarks for these different invocation strategies?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c482d4a769b7fdb5", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:c01865f42df5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8dae3229-fe71-453b-951a-7da37d0c8033"}}
{"id": "774e2ffe70893ba3", "prompt": "I see there's a MethodOverrideMiddleware and a BodyParsingMiddleware. If I send a POST request with a header X-Http-Method-Override: DELETE and a JSON body with an _method field set to PUT, which middleware takes precedence and what is the final HTTP method used by the router?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "774e2ffe70893ba3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:eec93e0ff674", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e3558e8a-7ecb-49ea-a5b3-1532611e64bc"}}
{"id": "d2f9c63528cb0aa3", "prompt": "Regarde `Slim\\Middleware\\ErrorMiddleware.php`. Comment est ce que l'erreur est capturée et transmise au `ErrorHandler` ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d2f9c63528cb0aa3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:45811b6dc673", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4956f9b9-95ce-4500-a9b2-af94d801e2b9"}}
{"id": "dbcdee5b2ac66e4e", "prompt": "I'm setting up a new project using Slim Framework 4. Can you check the current status page for GitHub Actions to see if there are any known outages that might affect the build badge in the README?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dbcdee5b2ac66e4e", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:8dec8e5f3c42", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "599fcd1b-f845-4fb2-95a5-5838166004df"}}
{"id": "9ad931b719670136", "prompt": "The `Slim/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryProvider.php` is failing to detect the `Nyholm/psr7` factory if it's installed in the `vendor` directory but not explicitly registered.\n\nLooking at the `Psr17Factory::getFactory()` method, it checks for class existence but seems to miss the Nyholm case if the namespace is slightly different or if the autoloader is fresh. Can you add explicit handling or reflection check for Nyholm's `ServerRequestFactory` and `ResponseFactory`?\n\nError output:\n```\nRuntimeException: No suitable PSR-17 factory found for ServerRequest\n```\n\nThis is happening in `Slim/Factory/ServerRequestCreatorFactory.php` line 45.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update tests/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryTest.php to cover Nyholm."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9ad931b719670136", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:d7168115d9f6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "846e5fee-edb4-49cb-a734-bc1fb9d2d7af"}}
{"id": "0a3ca0eb6c69e2f3", "prompt": "Fix: `Slim\\Middleware\\MethodOverrideMiddleware` is doubling up route arguments.\n\nCommit `417c189` mentions \"Stop decoding route arguments twice\" but it seems the fix only applied to one strategy. The `RequestResponseNamedArgs` strategy in `Slim/Handlers/Strategies/RequestResponseNamedArgs.php` is still decoding the route parameters twice:\n1. Once by the Router\n2. Once by the strategy itself if it calls `json_decode` or similar on the request body or attributes.\n\nActually, looking closer, the issue is that `MethodOverrideMiddleware` sets an attribute on the request, but the handler strategies are not checking if arguments have already been parsed, leading to duplicate parsing attempts in some paths. Can you audit `Slim/Handlers/Strategies/` and `Slim/Middleware/MethodOverrideMiddleware.php` to ensure arguments are only decoded once?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0a3ca0eb6c69e2f3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:5ee86fe014d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b89aefb1-8eb7-4ca9-80af-359d688142cf"}}
{"id": "87db877b085fdc59", "prompt": "Slim\\Handlers\\Strategies\\RequestResponseNamedArgs.php において、名前付き引数（named arguments）がどのように解決されているのか教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "87db877b085fdc59", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:7bd3c6053a49", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0a0d9bf-399c-4bea-acb5-b56bbbd62d74"}}
{"id": "9fdc2f8d7d9193ca", "prompt": "Audit de la gestion des fichiers via `Slim/Middleware/BodyParsingMiddleware.php` : Est-ce que ce middleware est vulnérable aux attaques par injection de type de contenu (Content-Type Spoofing) ou à l'exécution de code via des fichiers uploadés ? Vérifie la sécurité de la parse du body.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9fdc2f8d7d9193ca", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:1357d89d20ce", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f17b8441-5348-48e5-afff-6a50a1739541"}}
{"id": "ebf406084f5887bd", "prompt": "The Slim framework has several PSR-17 factory implementations listed in the Factory/Psr17 directory (Guzzle, HttpSoft, Laminas, Nyholm). Beyond performance benchmarks mentioned in the README, are there any feature differences between these implementations that should influence my choice, specifically regarding file upload handling?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ebf406084f5887bd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:a6b6bfb2401e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "56a143af-2d61-4c2f-8f44-7038fb62c611"}}
{"id": "2e34b57616892eee", "prompt": "In `Slim/App.php`, there's a lot of setup logic. I see `SLIM_APP` environment variables mentioned in docs but the codebase seems to rely heavily on `AppFactory::create()`. Is `AppFactory` the recommended way to bootstrap Slim 4, and if so, what is the purpose of `Slim/App.php` being the core class rather than having a static bootstrap helper? I'm confused about the separation of concerns between `App` and `AppFactory`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you explain the lifecycle differences between using `AppFactory::create()` vs manually instantiating `new Slim\\App()`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2e34b57616892eee", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:ca59c70e2d16", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe25f54f-49df-4828-aaea-d769105b36d6"}}
{"id": "00de23d61383c1e3", "prompt": "I noticed the commit message 'Stop decoding route arguments twice'. What was the issue with the previous behavior, and is there any backward compatibility concern if I upgrade to a version that includes this fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "00de23d61383c1e3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:9689ad3011d5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28cda176-a3de-47f2-aa0b-db5e909e2e24"}}
{"id": "0eb4c8ec526cf880", "prompt": "Can you take the changes I just made to `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php` and split them into two logical commits? One for the logic fix and one for the new type hint updates. Make sure the commit messages follow standard conventions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0eb4c8ec526cf880", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:d879e251beb2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c27e6c04-b14b-49d9-9ae3-1a3c38beb852"}}
{"id": "dba9cb080631289d", "prompt": "Could you audit our current dependencies for any known security vulnerabilities? I'm worried about the PSR-7 implementations we support.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "dba9cb080631289d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:79a68f49e9a3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "147f89c5-240a-4932-9236-14a13495708c"}}
{"id": "e948b6c8c4ec56d1", "prompt": "帮我检查一下当前目录下有没有正在监听的 Web 服务进程，如果有，列出它们的 PID。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e948b6c8c4ec56d1", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:f91aad544812", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e158612d-b16c-4c9a-b1f8-812a5eca6ed9"}}
{"id": "a8f3188dee6d7ea7", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify Slim/Routing/RouteCollector.php and what was the purpose of their change?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the diff for that specific commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a8f3188dee6d7ea7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:2ce10d9ee2de", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "14bb0ad5-c5d5-41ae-a039-64aba9090f97"}}
{"id": "5148f105ad170f35", "prompt": "I'm trying to run the full test suite but it keeps hanging on `tests/Routing/FastRouteDispatcherTest.php`. The error output is just a timeout message. Can you check that test file and the dispatcher implementation to see if there's an infinite loop or a missing break condition?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5148f105ad170f35", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:6e4e800d5e56", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe09d242-76ce-4d6c-9142-8e8b4441aae6"}}
{"id": "4c1fb1ce4761469f", "prompt": "Can you list all the branches currently in this repository?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4c1fb1ce4761469f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:a86e399d5611", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "30c7c090-2d0c-4774-b52f-1a088e1a50df"}}
{"id": "314fc7b63c561780", "prompt": "Peux-tu m'expliquer comment fonctionne la détection automatique des décorateurs Slim-Http dans `Slim\\Factory\\AppFactory` ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "314fc7b63c561780", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:02a508dcf361", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d53c110-26ea-4807-8388-10563ebac41e"}}
{"id": "40cfbf4f70ab64b5", "prompt": "Hola, estoy intentando ejecutar el suite de pruebas pero me da este error: 'PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class \"Slim\\Factory\\AppFactory\" not found'. He hecho composer install y las dependencias están ahí. ¿Podrías revisar por qué no se cargan bien las clases de Slim/Factory/?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "40cfbf4f70ab64b5", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:e53b14e76c2e", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "653f62f5-e017-421b-b29e-e3310601b5fa"}}
{"id": "879010dbdb0b1a3b", "prompt": "In Slim 4, I see there are different strategies for handling route handlers like RequestResponse, RequestHandler, and RequestResponseNamedArgs. When should I use RequestResponseNamedArgs over the standard RequestResponse strategy? Is it just about function signature preference?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show a code example using RequestResponseNamedArgs?"}, {"prompt": "Does using RequestResponseNamedArgs impact performance compared to RequestResponse?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "879010dbdb0b1a3b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:c7f5898da978", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d27c20c-a594-4391-a441-bd6810e4e199"}}
{"id": "c469f32e23324063", "prompt": "Can you run phpcs and phpstan and fix any issues they report? I want to merge this branch but I'm seeing some style warnings in CI.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c469f32e23324063", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:dc162fda4a2f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3edd2175-994f-4397-a69f-5e92608348aa"}}
{"id": "68bab8f16de1d08d", "prompt": "I'm seeing a deprecation notice in `Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php` related to the PSR-15 interface. Can you check the latest PSR-15 documentation to see if the handling of exceptions in `process()` methods has changed in version 2.0? I want to make sure our implementation in `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler` is still compliant with the standard.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "68bab8f16de1d08d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:572fa8dbd06e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e3e2b8c-64ae-444b-850f-e69d554bfeb8"}}
{"id": "95f4ed8e49d083cf", "prompt": "The current README mentions Slim-Http decorators. Could you expand that section to clarify that these are recommended for enhanced ServerRequest and Response functionality, and explicitly show how to disable automatic detection via AppFactory and ServerRequestCreatorFactory?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a warning that disabling auto-detection might require manual dependency injection of the decorators."}, {"prompt": "Can you verify the code snippet in the README matches the implementation in Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "95f4ed8e49d083cf", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:ff56572ec53c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0e1c55b-94ee-4171-9cbb-ad452ff78faf"}}
{"id": "60545074b4d49647", "prompt": "Necesito que modifiques Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php para que sustituya los caracteres UTF-8 inválidos antes de convertirlos a JSON, usando JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE y limpiando el string. Haz que el código sea robusto.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Ejecuta solo ese nuevo test para confirmar que pasa."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "60545074b4d49647", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:10832f87de90", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a30603a3-746a-47e3-9852-6b297f80e920"}}
{"id": "97ea31149bdf8cdd", "prompt": "Show me the most recent commit message and the full diff for the change that addressed the 'intermittent-text-failure' branch.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97ea31149bdf8cdd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:88472be06997", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80ab2627-1ae4-49cc-8adf-031b08dd861d"}}
{"id": "9559f8a8371c8d58", "prompt": "The routing middleware in Slim/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php is getting complex with all the route group handling. Can you extract the logic for resolving route groups into a separate method or helper class? I want to clean up the handle method so it's just delegating. Also, please check Slim/Routing/RouteGroup.php to see if we can simplify how group data is stored.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9559f8a8371c8d58", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:56dc34a9410c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5a4be667-03cc-4ee9-a570-e52943a6261b"}}
{"id": "f21da861520f8474", "prompt": "检查一下当前系统里有没有正在运行的 PHP 进程，如果有的话，帮我把它们全部停掉。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f21da861520f8474", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:26513fa8a968", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8663bfe1-de3d-44f4-b585-22863c98189f"}}
{"id": "2c1a5fa0c04406ca", "prompt": "I'm curious about the routing in `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher`. Slim 4 switched from php-fast-route to its own dispatcher class that wraps it. Why didn't Slim just stick to using the raw php-fast-route package directly in the framework core? What additional logic or state management does `FastRouteDispatcher` provide over the raw library?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does `RouteResolver` use `FastRouteDispatcher` to determine allowed methods?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2c1a5fa0c04406ca", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:6537f53fb4d8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8da491ef-3963-4ec8-b77e-609208be1a67"}}
{"id": "4ba7f3a1f427441e", "prompt": "Slim\\Factory\\AppFactory::create() がどのようにして PSR-7 実装を自動検出し、App インスタンスを生成しているのか教えてください。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "自動検出のロジックは具体的にどのメソッドに書かれていますか？"}, {"prompt": "特定の PSR-7 実装がインストールされていない場合に発生する挙動についても教えてください。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4ba7f3a1f427441e", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:6eb8f6862981", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6d690d43-283d-4408-ab63-3c036eff60a8"}}
{"id": "1fe933d52a290d62", "prompt": "Quick sanity check: does the project actually build? Run composer install --no-dev and then try to bootstrap the app to ensure no syntax errors or missing dependencies in the core Slim/ classes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1fe933d52a290d62", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:5f76b83853c3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2dbd0dbf-7f96-4711-a0fe-61bd20fd905f"}}
{"id": "9cfad16d217ffe88", "prompt": "Comment fonctionne l'injection des arguments dans les callbacks avec `Slim\\Handlers\\Strategies\\RequestResponseNamedArgs.php` ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9cfad16d217ffe88", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:ceefce18d2d3", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "32de5c66-a979-4d17-8800-f7054f5a1208"}}
{"id": "88a3e797b783df22", "prompt": "In Slim/CallableResolver.php, the check for invokable classes is a bit verbose. I want to refactor the resolve method to use a consistent pattern across all callable resolution. Specifically, can you standardize how we check for __invoke, closures, and static calls? I want to reduce the nesting level in the main resolve loop.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does this change affect Slim/Interfaces/CallableResolverInterface.php?"}, {"prompt": "Run `composer test tests/CallableResolverTest.php`"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "88a3e797b783df22", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:650c22852ff0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "04695b50-de5a-49da-84f6-bbf27d9d9556"}}
{"id": "47c5da906b9de758", "prompt": "Wir müssen die Performance der Routing-Komponente optimieren. Arbeite bitte an zwei Fronten:\n- Implementiere eine Cache-Limitierung für `Slim\\Routing\\FastRouteDispatcher::getAllowedMethods()`, damit der Cache nicht unendlich wächst.\n- Untersuche, ob wir das doppelte Dekodieren von Route-Argumenten in den Routing-Klassen (wie in Commit 417c189 angedeutet) überall vollständig eliminiert haben.\nErstelle für beide Änderungen neue Tests in `tests/Routing/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "47c5da906b9de758", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:178cc82daedb", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40b42733-11d3-4a45-b50a-60bb952df6e4"}}
{"id": "53f4d9ee4ea6c483", "prompt": "I noticed `Slim/Exception/HttpNotFoundException.php` might be missing a custom description field. Can you add a `$description` property to it and update the constructor?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "53f4d9ee4ea6c483", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:1f49c0d4a52d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "82760834-dde6-4674-b578-9d276c59f49f"}}
{"id": "a40b8e3cff7a8ca9", "prompt": "I'm investigating a potential CVE related to JSON error rendering. Can you search the GitHub Security Advisories for any open CVEs associated with 'slimphp/Slim' or 'Slim Framework' in the last 6 months? I specifically want to know if there's a vulnerability related to invalid UTF-8 handling in the error renderers.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If you find one, give me the summary and the fix version."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a40b8e3cff7a8ca9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:c6549a010385", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "562eca02-a6f2-4d9d-9fb1-f45b5f2f7402"}}
{"id": "c9c7b6bad9f3509d", "prompt": "我看 Slim 的文档里提到了 Slim-Http 装饰器，但我找不到具体的安装命令。去 composer 官方或者 Slim-Http 的 GitHub 页面查一下，安装 slim/http 的正确命令是什么？另外，文档里说可以用 `AppFactory::setSlimHttpDecoratorsAutomaticDetection(false)` 来关闭自动检测，这个方法的最新用法有变化吗？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "如果我不想用装饰器，只装 Slim 核心，需要排除哪些依赖？"}, {"prompt": "有没有示例代码展示手动创建 Psr17Factory 的步骤？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9c7b6bad9f3509d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:f86c2423e7cb", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d051e60-f11e-4f7d-9d14-aa1acd8c43e7"}}
{"id": "aae4eabb31d138dc", "prompt": "I noticed a TODO in Slim/Routing/RouteCollector.php. Can you find all TODO comments in the codebase and list them with their line numbers?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "aae4eabb31d138dc", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:635e952ddf3f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cc634353-10b5-4879-9e37-b9ae143e2156"}}
{"id": "6a3c45ec9c4effeb", "prompt": "Show the commit details for 8e77282. It looks like a fix for the JSON error renderer.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Were there any other related fixes in that same pull request?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6a3c45ec9c4effeb", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:c2541b84802d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "57b0c664-42d7-4b45-99e3-55b752a73890"}}
{"id": "727a55c06e3ff5d7", "prompt": "I've been tweaking the error handling in Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php to better handle large payloads. Can you add a check to ensure the response size doesn't exceed a specific threshold before rendering?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "727a55c06e3ff5d7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:31d9b1e0eb25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43f1140f-2cf7-46fc-9677-1726a8a9d7c7"}}
{"id": "0fa7ac1a5e88b531", "prompt": "Check `Slim\\Middleware\\RoutingMiddleware.php` and add a simple log entry via `Slim\\Logger` whenever a route is successfully matched.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a test case in `tests/Middleware/RoutingMiddlewareTest.php` to verify this logging happens."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0fa7ac1a5e88b531", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:d53d4f6ac06e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9c6f13ca-2705-4072-b04f-6cd65ca25de3"}}
{"id": "40a239eb2fc8e9f9", "prompt": "Hey, noticed in `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php` that `getAllowedMethods()` is getting really slow because it's recalculating allowed methods on every request. \n\nThere's a commit `3f42b15` that mentions binding the cache size. Can you check if the memoization logic in `getAllowedMethods` is correctly limiting the cache size so it doesn't grow unbounded? If not, fix it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40a239eb2fc8e9f9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:9e725ba9abc2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3ccaa95a-7ba7-4767-a452-2a5a0eee0710"}}
{"id": "fada52ae9be0f4f0", "prompt": "I'm getting an issue with `Slim\\Factory\\Psr17\\Psr17FactoryProvider` not finding the `Nyholm/Psr7` classes even though they are installed in `composer.json`.\n\nThe provider uses reflection or class_exists checks that might be failing due to case sensitivity or autoloader order in certain environments. Please review `Slim/Factory/Psr17/Psr17FactoryProvider.php` and `Slim/Factory/Psr17/NyholmPsr17Factory.php` to ensure that the detection logic for `Nyholm/Psr7` is robust and doesn't throw a RuntimeException if the classes are present but slightly misconfigured.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fada52ae9be0f4f0", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:d83da6e4b9fd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53dc5015-65ab-4145-aaee-ab4486dad28c"}}
{"id": "87d5249c40cd23a6", "prompt": "盯着这个目录，等新的测试报告文件生成了再通知我。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "87d5249c40cd23a6", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "slim:a23ad10f010e", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86e31fe1-bc04-4a4a-8291-f6cac395cdc4"}}
{"id": "858962ff07f9a585", "prompt": "Compare the changes in Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php between commit 943e4b6 and 17a97f1.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "858962ff07f9a585", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:83a029e5b9a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d4b5a9c-e38a-4071-9792-4cc5a6fabf83"}}
{"id": "7e237ccea9eeb4b7", "prompt": "Je ne comprends pas bien la logique de `Slim\\Routing\\RouteCollector`. Comment sont stockées les routes lors de l'ajout d'un groupe ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7e237ccea9eeb4b7", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:369b91bc1e47", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe783a74-d841-4a87-91e2-828c5858c4f0"}}
{"id": "023fd7c68c5db646", "prompt": "Hey, can you find every place where `Slim\\Factory\\AppFactory::create()` instantiates the application? I'm writing a blog post and need to cite all the concrete implementations of `Psr17FactoryInterface` that are auto-detected.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "023fd7c68c5db646", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:c1abb6b7002d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "da2a25e5-214a-4ab9-8421-09dbffa269e9"}}
{"id": "9af36cb13ef6ce97", "prompt": "where's the code that stops route arguments from being decoded twice? #3470", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9af36cb13ef6ce97", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:0a2f4e87d306", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64ee7564-3e03-40c5-9f21-eb1142f30893"}}
{"id": "2afb441a3f9f9036", "prompt": "I'm seeing an issue where invalid UTF-8 characters in error responses are breaking my JSON output. I saw a recent commit 'ddafc0f Substitute invalid UTF-8 in JSON error renderer output'. Which file implements this fix and what helper function is it using?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does JsonErrorRendererTest cover this case?"}, {"prompt": "Are there other error renderers that might have the same issue?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2afb441a3f9f9036", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:a9f3e124f782", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b1fe865a-4171-4bdc-944d-ef9735031854"}}
{"id": "56571be55c1fa670", "prompt": "Update CONTRIBUTING.md to include a section on our testing standards. Mention that we use PHPUnit and that developers should run the tests using the existing configuration in phpunit.xml.dist before submitting a PR.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "56571be55c1fa670", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "slim:bd5132d6365c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4513f7f3-a7bd-4e15-9a73-c7381939591c"}}
{"id": "8a9bf2f3d66a8162", "prompt": "The `MethodOverrideMiddleware` is failing when the request body is empty but the method override header is set. It throws an `InvalidArgumentException` saying \"Content-Type must be provided\" even though I'm using the default override header `_METHOD`.\n\nTrace:\n```\nInvalidArgumentException in MethodOverrideMiddleware.php:35\nContent-Type must be provided or use the _method request parameter.\n```\n\nI don't want to force POST bodies for method overrides via headers. Can you update `MethodOverrideMiddleware::process` to check if the `_METHOD` parameter is present in the query string or body *before* demanding a Content-Type header? Currently, it seems to prioritize `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` requirements over the header-based override.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8a9bf2f3d66a8162", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:6f90063ac176", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b6742c3-9538-477c-ab6e-c4f999622228"}}
{"id": "73c7703113a838ad", "prompt": "J'ai une erreur bizarre sur mon serveur. Peux-tu vérifier dans `Slim\\ResponseEmitter.php` comment le corps de la réponse est envoyé au client ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Est-ce que les headers sont envoyés avant ou après le body ?"}, {"prompt": "Comment sont gérés les flux (streams) dans cette fonction ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "73c7703113a838ad", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:6dddc18ee29f", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8553dd6d-abef-442c-8e21-288c7662c8dd"}}
{"id": "4df3e2a7c87f9b92", "prompt": "I'm trying to track down a memory leak in the middleware dispatcher. Can you show me the git log for today? Specifically, I want to see if any recent commits touched `Slim/MiddlewareDispatcher.php` or `Slim/Routing/Dispatcher.php`. Also, does the project build cleanly on the latest commit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4df3e2a7c87f9b92", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:11c63ba150ff", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fe35199d-2bc3-4a4b-986f-2dcb7a63c517"}}
{"id": "27db8b7a941733ac", "prompt": "The JSON error renderer is crashing when the exception message contains invalid UTF-8 sequences (which can happen with binary data in headers or logs).\n\n```\nWarning: json_encode(): Invalid UTF-8 sequence in argument\n```\n\nPlease look at `Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php` and ensure that all string fields (message, previous message, etc.) are sanitized before being passed to `json_encode`. It should probably use `JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR` and fallback gracefully.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "27db8b7a941733ac", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:f81ce158655e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2750943d-2437-4cb2-ba25-597034ce7ff1"}}
{"id": "b9788d4f29c2e8a8", "prompt": "Hey, can you run the PHP code style fixer and then run the tests to make sure nothing broke? I think there are some formatting inconsistencies in `Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware.php` and `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler.php`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b9788d4f29c2e8a8", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:82a005870467", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0831c804-b66b-4790-bf93-4f739ba82cc5"}}
{"id": "432456373ba7102a", "prompt": "I just committed my changes to `Slim/Routing/RouteCollector.php` but I forgot to add a docblock to the `addGroup` method. Can you amend my last commit to include this fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "432456373ba7102a", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:323f83fd20ed", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "18c9085d-23f8-4c91-8547-a3eda1126614"}}
{"id": "2d86d340edd668d9", "prompt": "Why is the build failing? I see this error:\n\nRuntimeException: The JSON error renderer failed to encode the response body because it contained invalid UTF-8 sequences.\n\nIt seems like #3468 might have missed something. Check Slim/Error/Renderers/JsonErrorRenderer.php.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2d86d340edd668d9", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "slim:7531c0b69fef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "33397731-8cfb-4aa7-9e9f-ae32936d026f"}}
{"id": "3cc5129e8da3834f", "prompt": "Run phpstan --level=max on the Slim/Middleware directory. I suspect we have some type safety regressions in the newer middleware implementations.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3cc5129e8da3834f", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:548faed16aa6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b71d2b7c-5710-49e3-9e37-aa2226d39f9b"}}
{"id": "f6adc74856ccf181", "prompt": "The README recommends using `Nyholm/psr7` for performance. Could you pull up the official Nyholm PSR-7 migration guide from their GitHub repo? I want to confirm if we need to explicitly set the `ServerRequest` creator factory to `Nyholm` in `AppFactory::create()` or if it still auto-detects it correctly when it's in the `composer.json` dependencies.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6adc74856ccf181", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:826a8b3460a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28627309-72c7-4ccb-8fea-0adce761ae44"}}
{"id": "1af4d9b9a1cf7a80", "prompt": "Looking at `Slim/Middleware/ErrorMiddleware`, I see it handles exceptions. But I also see `Slim/Handlers/ErrorHandler`. How do these two interact? Does the middleware delegate to the handler, or does the handler wrap the middleware? I'm trying to understand the flow when an uncaught exception occurs inside a route.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1af4d9b9a1cf7a80", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:7e90ab0bffbe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f661f9f6-12e4-4ecd-9460-c9751f277a65"}}
{"id": "4d4e3ce9525e4cfc", "prompt": "I see we have a lot of duplicate code in Slim/Factory/Psr17/GuzzlePsr17Factory.php, Slim/Factory/Psr17/HttpSoftPsr17Factory.php, Slim/Factory/Psr17/LaminasDiactorosPsr17Factory.php, Slim/Factory/Psr17/NyholmPsr17Factory.php, and Slim/Factory/Psr17/SlimPsr17Factory.php. They all basically implement Psr17FactoryInterface with slight variations. Can you extract a base class or trait that handles the common stream and response creation logic, so these classes just focus on the specific server request creation parts?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4d4e3ce9525e4cfc", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "slim:2ea4dced217f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3b07c79-5a05-45d2-8122-207e16729bfc"}}
{"id": "e857cf24e3fd8548", "prompt": "Where is the `HttpNotFoundHttpException` class actually defined? I need to see the full namespace and class structure.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e857cf24e3fd8548", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:47f9aadb4272", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "82e4f0e0-eade-4b0c-9ae4-de8c03f12474"}}
{"id": "1124fe528722b6dd", "prompt": "Looking at the commit history, I see 'Stop decoding route arguments twice' in 417c189. I need to reproduce this issue locally. Can you fetch the live response from https://api.github.com/repos/slimphp/Slim/commits/417c189 to see the full diff and confirm what files were modified?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1124fe528722b6dd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:547e39b6a571", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af55ebf1-2f66-417f-bab9-491ffe244669"}}
{"id": "3aa5e869f96ace53", "prompt": "The error message in `Slim/Error/Renderers/PlainTextErrorRenderer.php` is too technical. Change 'Internal Server Error' to 'A server error occurred' in the output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3aa5e869f96ace53", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:5ebbd0905f63", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "316efb84-3855-4e7c-afd9-6b2f6f011796"}}
{"id": "6168790980d6917d", "prompt": "I'm setting up my Slim 4 application. The README mentions that 'ServerRequest and Response object decorators are automatically detected and applied by the internal factories' if Slim-Http is installed. How exactly does this auto-detection work, and can I rely on it in a production environment where dependencies are frozen?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6168790980d6917d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "slim:6d34eced4b25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75471d69-0ba9-4406-ba1b-20cea14fec6a"}}
{"id": "45eb9a3791528eb0", "prompt": "Compare the changes between commit 417c189 and 2d70815. What actually changed in the files?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "45eb9a3791528eb0", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:ec7f53c8eb16", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53c68f21-7dfa-441e-ab5e-387e81dc3a7f"}}
{"id": "7e1fd26288e9bcbe", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `tests/Middleware/BodyParsingMiddlewareTest.php` that specifically checks how it handles an empty JSON body string.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7e1fd26288e9bcbe", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:950dc0753bfd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "87b222e5-13bd-4b24-9d75-cec2216ef1d6"}}
{"id": "be054a2b40007331", "prompt": "I need to verify the external dependencies. Visit https://packagist.org/packages/slim/slim and tell me what the current stable version is and when it was last updated. I want to make sure my composer.json isn't pointing to an outdated version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "be054a2b40007331", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:69e183fefcbe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64d6bf1b-08df-4505-b182-3dd3d2e35460"}}
{"id": "e9b1dba2741ca4e1", "prompt": "I noticed a typo in my previous commit message for the `Slim/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php` update. Can you amend the last commit with the corrected message?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9b1dba2741ca4e1", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:58d7b67bee6c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b4b2f0e-241f-4385-b3ad-9c76890dc092"}}
{"id": "374e331fa4896d86", "prompt": "We should probably add `phpstan/phpstan` to the dev dependencies if it's not already there. Check composer.json first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "374e331fa4896d86", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "slim:0ecc58bc5bec", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c9b0b90f-700c-45e4-9d7e-406320a17e82"}}
{"id": "ec42680433b23cb3", "prompt": "I need to know the exact dependency tree for `Slim/Factory/Psr17/NyholmPsr17Factory.php`. Who calls it? Who uses it? List every file in the `Slim/Factory` directory that references `NyholmPsr17Factory`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now do the same for `SlimHttpPsr17Factory`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ec42680433b23cb3", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:0e1fa61b0771", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "743e66da-b194-47af-9729-2eaac6ff2502"}}
{"id": "920247daf5c5f5a2", "prompt": "In `Slim/Exception/HttpException.php`, add a public method `getDetails()` that returns the error details if they exist, otherwise returns null.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "920247daf5c5f5a2", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "slim:818f4ca25b04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7b4b21b8-134b-48e8-a564-2462c1d6d8eb"}}
{"id": "883464627d86a262", "prompt": "Who was the last person to touch Slim/Routing/RouteResolver.php and what was the commit message?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "883464627d86a262", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "slim:c2f8881a0700", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2c8c9fa8-88dd-4c40-8aad-c0384c6b1fba"}}
{"id": "b5b20f6c2bb2014a", "prompt": "I'm debugging why invalid UTF-8 in my JSON error response is breaking the client. Look at `JsonErrorRenderer`. Where is the invalid UTF-8 substitution happening?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b5b20f6c2bb2014a", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "slim:9f6fdc39e730", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "254e1466-74f8-496d-86f8-c6f145e7d636"}}
{"id": "06ad60d6623d3f5c", "prompt": "Check the Slim-Http README to confirm if Slim-Psr7 is still the recommended default PSR-7 implementation for Slim 4. I want to make sure I'm not using a deprecated package before refactoring our AppFactory setup.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "06ad60d6623d3f5c", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:91050322813c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b509b5f8-e76f-4f54-8679-b9a71b032312"}}
{"id": "494068ffffc46fc6", "prompt": "In `Slim/Middleware/OutputBufferingMiddleware.php`, count the number of public methods. Then check `tests/Middleware/OutputBufferingMiddlewareTest.php` and list the names of all test methods defined there.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "494068ffffc46fc6", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:45532ad6435a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ff078d5-51c8-4b94-8a0c-9d5831459f35"}}
{"id": "6b81c03f87f11b86", "prompt": "Revisa Slim/CallableResolver.php y dime si está resolviendo correctamente los invocables que no tienen constructor. He leído que a veces falla con las clases que no inyectan dependencias.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6b81c03f87f11b86", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "slim:651cae729d16", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f81f64a1-7d6e-4868-b1a7-1b9320949832"}}
{"id": "6d0c37f1f67c46ae", "prompt": "I'm seeing intermittent failures in `Slim\\Routing\\FastRouteDispatcher::getAllowedMethods()` when running the test suite under high concurrency. The stack trace points to a race condition in the static cache:\n\n```\nPHP Fatal error:  Uncaught TypeError: Argument 1 passed to array_flip() must be of the type array, null given\n```\n\nIt looks like `getAllowedMethods()` caches the result of `getAllowedMethods()` internally but doesn't handle the case where the cache key might be invalidated or the result might be null in a concurrent request. Can you fix the caching logic in `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php` to be thread-safe or at least consistent?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you add a test case in `tests/Routing/FastRouteDispatcherTest.php` that simulates this race condition or at least verifies the cache behavior with invalid route groups?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6d0c37f1f67c46ae", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "slim:80d5c6fa0991", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "27e96a26-cfb9-421c-bc61-38f69ee8d4c2"}}
{"id": "a7ea4b22494e0a35", "prompt": "Slim\\Routing\\RouteCollector.php でルートが登録される際、どのようなプロセスを経て Slim\\Routing\\Route オブジェクトが生成されるのか教えてください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7ea4b22494e0a35", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "slim:b94a4cb9220e", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d48fbbdb-ffcc-48f1-802f-033198dc8e2a"}}
{"id": "f02c40448c3bb975", "prompt": "Parse `composer.json` and extract all package names from the `require` and `require-dev` sections. Are there any packages listed in `require-dev` that are missing from the autoload files in `autoload/` (if present, otherwise just list them)?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f02c40448c3bb975", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "slim:1ad6beabade2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6af122a-f087-46d9-938e-5608921af810"}}
{"id": "79f21bf8823b4abd", "prompt": "I'm getting intermittent 429 Too Many Requests errors when hitting the Slim Framework API documentation site (www.slimframework.com/docs). Can you curl the site right now and tell me if it's actually returning a 429, or if the site is up and running normally? I need to know if this is a client-side rate limiting issue or a server-side outage.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "79f21bf8823b4abd", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:26bf2fbc700e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d661e697-0e5b-4e53-b4bd-f4a36bd6f4cc"}}
{"id": "bf125dd229c0621d", "prompt": "I have some messy changes in `Slim/Factory/AppFactory.php` that I'm not ready to commit yet. Stash them for me.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bf125dd229c0621d", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "slim:3081da5a676c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bce87a2-0d64-403b-bb75-0bfd859143ac"}}
{"id": "586e0c1d84b5af31", "prompt": "查阅一下 Slim 4 的迁移指南。我从 Slim 3 升级过来，发现 `Slim\\Route` 的 `setName()` 方法和路由闭包的使用方式好像变了。官方文档里关于 `RouteGroup` 和中间件顺序变更的具体说明在哪里？有没有详细的 Breaking Changes 列表？", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "中间件堆栈（Middleware Stack）在 Slim 4 里是怎么处理的？"}, {"prompt": "路由解析器（RouteResolver）的行为在 4.x 版本有什么改进？"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "586e0c1d84b5af31", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:7aa641aacbd5", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7212fdb9-a687-461c-bec0-c944a2762b55"}}
{"id": "0ff74a6b01129231", "prompt": "我在处理请求体解析时遇到了问题。查一下 Symfony 或者 PSR-7 官方规范，关于 `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` 和 `multipart/form-data` 在 `ServerRequest` 对象中的访问方式有什么不同？Slim 的 `BodyParsingMiddleware` 默认解析了哪些内容类型？我在文档里没找到支持 JSON 请求体的配置项。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ff74a6b01129231", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:a520901c3ff0", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "21adff6e-e7b8-4829-b3ab-a522a6997155"}}
{"id": "b1617ebcd04f0bec", "prompt": "J'ai vu un commit #3465 de 'kaii-k' concernant 'sec02-bound-allowed-methods-cache'. Peux-tu expliquer l'impact de cette modification sur `Slim/Routing/FastRouteDispatcher.php` ? Est-ce que le cache des méthodes autorisées a été correctement isolé pour éviter les collisions entre requêtes concurrentes ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b1617ebcd04f0bec", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "slim:f5dfd8f89c22", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8c7117a-5231-4989-9af9-f755e6e31b8f"}}
{"id": "57f039cb7235b2ed", "prompt": "The README mentions 'Slim-Psr7' as a notable implementation. Can you check the current repository activity for https://github.com/slimphp/Slim-Psr7? I want to see the last commit date and the open issue count to decide if it's still maintained enough to integrate.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "57f039cb7235b2ed", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "slim:4f732fc64a33", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3889a671-fc91-49ab-8c94-7730a0aa9e28"}}
{"id": "76f1f1ece80d6f0a", "prompt": "We need to harden the error handling and response consistency across the framework. Please tackle the following three items:\n1. Review `Slim\\Error\\Renderers\\JsonErrorRenderer` to ensure it handles invalid UTF-8 sequences gracefully by substituting them with a placeholder, similar to the recent fix in `f99e857`.\n2. Audit `Slim\\Middleware\\ErrorMiddleware` to ensure the content-type negotiation is correctly triggered on every request and not cached incorrectly.\n3. Check `Slim\\Exception\\HttpException` and its subclasses to ensure they are correctly passing through the necessary metadata for the error handler to determine the response status.\n\nRun the existing tests in `tests/Handlers/ErrorHandlerTest.php` and `tests/Error/` to make sure nothing breaks.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "76f1f1ece80d6f0a", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "slim:f4e6d97f0d38", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "49fe4a7d-78a0-443e-b756-22d38d45dd5b"}}
{"id": "c5a9719dcaab557b", "prompt": "I'm seeing intermittent failures in the FastRouteDispatcher. The commit log mentions 'fix-intermittent-text-failure' but I can't find specific docs on why that happens or how to avoid it in my own middleware. Can you check the official Slim documentation or any migration guides for version 4.x regarding routing cache invalidation or FastRoute specifics?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c5a9719dcaab557b", "repo": "slim", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "slim:ab0df336c3b8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "slim-024", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d1eb341-149f-4a5e-97d6-10165a41e874"}}
{"id": "9bddf5f04c204316", "prompt": "`lib/thor/runner.rb` 中的 `run` 方法在并行执行组命令时偶尔会死锁。我怀疑是 `lock` 机制有问题。请检查 `lib/thor/group.rb` 和 `lib/thor/runner.rb`，看看是否可以在不引入新的同步原语的情况下解决这个竞态条件。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9bddf5f04c204316", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:d6412ddb2c38", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f376d01e-4538-4401-843a-5c7179261dba"}}
{"id": "263871e3e961b032", "prompt": "lib/thor/actions/inject_into_file.rb の `inject_into_file` メソッドの動作について教えて。既存のファイルに特定のブロックを挿入する仕組みはどうなってる？", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "263871e3e961b032", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:fbacdc4d2a5b", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1953fca1-0b5d-4ea9-b09c-208757415efd"}}
{"id": "3bb754971dc94cb4", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in lib/thor/parser.rb but they aren't ready for a PR yet. Can you stash my current changes?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Actually, forget the stash. Can you just revert the changes I made to lib/thor/parser.rb in the last commit? I messed up the argument parsing logic."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3bb754971dc94cb4", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:4f815746040d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fefddcbc-8ae5-45f6-aa3a-9e9b125e200d"}}
{"id": "13a002f048fa862b", "prompt": "지금 내 로컬 환경에서 포트 3000번 쓰고 있는 프로세스 있는지 확인하고, 있으면 죽여줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "13a002f048fa862b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:a23463d8a713", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d25190f-069e-4df5-be3b-7e9b90b1613b"}}
{"id": "f91e168271bdef6a", "prompt": "Find all places where `frozen_string_literal` is set to true in the lib/thor/shell directory.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is this consistent across all files in that directory?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f91e168271bdef6a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:8e781a198216", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8028023b-00f8-4cb7-85aa-3f9e39ae3b3b"}}
{"id": "f67997980c9fe350", "prompt": "Update lib/thor/shell/color.rb to use frozen string literals at the top of the file to be consistent with the rest of the project.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f67997980c9fe350", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:ee67d3883641", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b97faba2-d425-4536-8a9f-36eb7af11a3a"}}
{"id": "86b655ba19bbdfb1", "prompt": "run:bundle install", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "86b655ba19bbdfb1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:e5aaad0c1342", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b60955f-0a65-48e5-9f9c-0df084a69fd3"}}
{"id": "1098bef4c2752d54", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of warnings in CI. Can you run rubocop and auto-correct the style issues?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Commit the changes"}, {"prompt": "Check if the tests still pass"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1098bef4c2752d54", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:16bab9705065", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3372360-9408-4269-b67f-ba336e7320c4"}}
{"id": "5c17bc736dc6ec93", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior in the shell. Can you explain how lib/thor/shell/color.rb implements colorization? I need to know if it's using standard ANSI escape codes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5c17bc736dc6ec93", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:7012d7df4710", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6078d250-ccf1-483f-965e-169ad1bb2a6f"}}
{"id": "82629a6ae81c815b", "prompt": "We're seeing recent commits related to command injection vectors via open-uri and user input. Can you do a quick security review of lib/thor/actions.rb and lib/thor/actions/file_manipulation.rb? Specifically, check if any file operations or url accesses are properly sanitized against path traversal or injection attacks. We need to make sure we're not relying on open-uri unsafely.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "82629a6ae81c815b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:cf17a6a0dc38", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "43a67f7c-f0ed-4940-8040-ea873738883e"}}
{"id": "cb08a49232cc2de8", "prompt": "Run the tests and tell me if anything is failing in `spec/parser/`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cb08a49232cc2de8", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:c28e80e1d585", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a967fff7-ab4a-4af6-9359-af9f1f064be5"}}
{"id": "20f390456c6b1396", "prompt": "Can you explain the logic inside lib/thor/actions/inject_into_file.rb? Specifically, how does it decide where to insert the new content?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "20f390456c6b1396", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:5e6f453d1038", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee0a57a0-139f-4b50-9465-c8a5ee64a6c9"}}
{"id": "879cb67e1cee9361", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weirdness in the parser. Can you check `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` and see if we can rename `option_name` to just `name` throughout that file and its usage in `lib/thor/parser/options.rb`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "879cb67e1cee9361", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:26ea5856db3b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bbcfcae9-6650-4d98-a678-ed5e76ca3b20"}}
{"id": "2a34fb48d18d0459", "prompt": "지금 바로 터미널 인터랙티브 세션 들어갈 수 있게 환경 설정 좀 봐줘. 바로 명령어 칠 수 있는 상태로 만들어줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2a34fb48d18d0459", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:e110f9961ede", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4a287f0-4e29-48da-8c06-859860f58be3"}}
{"id": "070f2d4bd8042f26", "prompt": "The Thor gemspec specifies `open-uri` as a dependency. I know this is a standard library in Ruby < 3.0, but for Ruby 3.2+, is it still required as an external dependency, or should we update `thor.gemspec` to reflect that it's now built-in? Please check the Ruby release notes for 3.0+ changes regarding open-uri.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "070f2d4bd8042f26", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:3e196f35374d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f73c4836-a250-4c9b-a11e-49db8ac11d28"}}
{"id": "06fb436a2359c5db", "prompt": "I need a way to suppress warnings from gem-defined methods like `rails generate`. I saw a commit `7026317` that did this, but it seems to have broken nested command invocations inside a `Thor::Group`.\n\nSpecifically, if I have:\n\n```ruby\nclass MyApp\n  include Thor::Group\n  \n  def run_something\n    invoke :inner_task\n  end\n  \n  def inner_task\n    # emits a warning from a deprecated gem\n  end\nend\n```\n\nThe warning suppression is leaking into `inner_task`. Please look at `lib/thor/invocation.rb` and `lib/thor/base.rb` to see how warnings are currently handled and fix the scope.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "06fb436a2359c5db", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:3b46d4d2a2e8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "79a87ab6-340e-4248-b819-43ba467e149f"}}
{"id": "97cff4566821c763", "prompt": "I need to verify if hidden commands are correctly excluded from ambiguous invocations. Please locate the test case in `spec/` that covers the scenario described in commit `59a764a`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "97cff4566821c763", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:6eb2c3b867f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93713c92-fbb4-46f0-b70a-4f63cadaaa48"}}
{"id": "81602d4d49c6fa33", "prompt": "Wer hat die letzte Änderung in `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` vorgenommen und was war die Commit-Nachricht?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81602d4d49c6fa33", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:e4261eb7c93a", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebb6e161-7494-4b0a-a6be-4ccaa79eab24"}}
{"id": "8e84aed648572db5", "prompt": "Add a small helper method to `lib/thor/util.rb` that checks if a string is a valid file path.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Commit these changes with a descriptive message and create a new branch called 'feature/path-helper'"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8e84aed648572db5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:c698af89d576", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "617c349e-6f30-45c0-be21-9ac8a46efba8"}}
{"id": "5e05157469fdf12d", "prompt": "I'm trying to configure the `Thor::Shell::Color` class to disable all ANSI color codes because our CI environment doesn't support them, but `Thor.shell.color = false` doesn't seem to be working as expected. Can you check the official Thor wiki or documentation for the correct way to force no-color output?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I see it's handled via environment variables. Can you update `.rspec` or the test helper to set `THOR_COLOR=false` before running the specs?"}, {"prompt": "Great. Now can you ensure the `ShellSpec` mocks respect this environment variable so the tests don't flake on local machines with ANSI support?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5e05157469fdf12d", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:95ecad82e5e9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7f5aa533-67dc-4b5f-8637-71723f73cc6c"}}
{"id": "9e31271718b65170", "prompt": "Can you explain the difference between Thor::Group and Thor::Base? I know Thor::Group is better for bundling commands, but are there any technical limitations or performance reasons to use one over the other for a CLI tool?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9e31271718b65170", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:3e8ebd6b80eb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3e6a0c4-c472-4cfc-8df1-9c7fd5215306"}}
{"id": "826d4da56bada873", "prompt": "Ajoute la gem 'addressable' au Gemfile pour le support des URL complexes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "826d4da56bada873", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "thor:619ab4f7bbf2", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e07f8fa2-bd0b-4c58-aeb7-a0c352b7954c"}}
{"id": "c972a4e9668bc166", "prompt": "I can't seem to pass options to a subcommand when using `invoke` from inside a `Thor::Group`.\n\n```ruby\nclass Parent < Thor::Group\n  argument :name, type: :string\n  \n  def run_sub\n    invoke OtherCommand, [name], { my_option: \"value\" }\n  end\nend\n\nclass OtherCommand < Thor\n  option :my_option\n  def do_something\n    puts options[:my_option]\n  end\nend\n```\n\n`options[:my_option]` is always `nil` inside `do_something`. Is there a bug in `lib/thor/invocation.rb` regarding how options are merged in groups?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c972a4e9668bc166", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:ee35bc24696a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "196c93bd-4754-4979-88be-a8c91c0a82ca"}}
{"id": "affe0774dda2fb0f", "prompt": "The CI is failing on Ruby 4.0 build. Can you look at spec/runner_spec.rb? It looks like `Thor::Runner#run` is raising an error when a command doesn't exist in the current namespace but exists globally. I want to change the behavior so that it falls back to global commands for ambiguous invocations when strict mode isn't set. Make sure spec/rake_compat_spec.rb still passes too.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the full test suite to ensure nothing else broke."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "affe0774dda2fb0f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:09885ec61003", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b56189bc-674b-4f73-86c6-0a0ed9a7411e"}}
{"id": "b8e55abba75efe30", "prompt": "로컬 개발 환경 테스트를 위해 임시로 사용할 API 토큰 하나 생성해줘. 보안상 중요하지 않은 테스트용이면 돼.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b8e55abba75efe30", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:d7d613a9d99b", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3eb0008e-8117-4399-aff2-c4b3fcebdac9"}}
{"id": "9715bcfce556e7de", "prompt": "What changed in the parser between the 6a680f2 commit and the current state?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9715bcfce556e7de", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:d4f5d88caec2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26dae32e-cd4f-4ac3-a1d6-4fbe09582fcf"}}
{"id": "26ca78ce37fd7bc9", "prompt": "How does the command invocation process work in lib/thor/invocation.rb? I want to understand the path from calling a command to actually executing it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "26ca78ce37fd7bc9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:63c8f6c69604", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4ddb5b0b-3341-40a9-a4f8-cc4f722ca77c"}}
{"id": "c6247cd15404698c", "prompt": "The current file manipulation actions are getting a bit bloated. I'd like to split some of the logic in `lib/thor/actions/file_manipulation.rb`. \n\n1. Extract the logic for path sanitization into a dedicated method in `lib/thor/util.rb`.\n2. Review `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` and `lib/thor/actions/inject_into_file.rb` to see if they can share a common helper for checking file existence/permissions.\n3. Update `spec/actions_spec.rb` to cover these new utility methods.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c6247cd15404698c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "thor:d873d002b987", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d053f28c-bcd1-46df-8412-e0ade8c11000"}}
{"id": "827af77dd699eff1", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how `Thor::Base` handles registration of commands. Where is the `register` method defined and what does it do with the arguments passed to it?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you find the test case in spec/register_spec.rb that covers this registration flow?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "827af77dd699eff1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:f6632d448d91", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "066114e9-6d13-46cf-9f34-f8793017b7d0"}}
{"id": "26d4cb94032ea0bd", "prompt": "where is the logic for `inject_into_file` defined? specifically looking for where it decides to prepend or append.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "26d4cb94032ea0bd", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:9180c53fd97a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0802abd-fb60-4143-a2d9-16ed17e8c4a5"}}
{"id": "0d1f67c21ca27de2", "prompt": "compare the version in lib/thor/version.rb with the latest commit tags if available", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0d1f67c21ca27de2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:3c55c0180318", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "57e1bab7-320c-4f30-975b-2fd268821ab4"}}
{"id": "8af78016b229bfaa", "prompt": "Refactor `lib/thor/base.rb` to use the new utility method we just added for path validation.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Split this refactor into two logical commits: one for the implementation and one for the test updates, then commit them."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8af78016b229bfaa", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:b9b219b0715b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a9917e7-07dc-4166-af87-808c094e8144"}}
{"id": "1df7b4c7dc4fdc2c", "prompt": "can you look at lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb and add a small check to ensure the target path isn't nil before proceeding?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "that looks good. split my current work into two logical commits: one for the safety check and one for the documentation updates, then commit them."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1df7b4c7dc4fdc2c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:1e8c0d8e52c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cf0402b9-f8af-4a3d-83ef-ab630574ce8e"}}
{"id": "d639e127c5436c87", "prompt": "We're preparing for the 1.5.0 release. Update the version constant in `lib/thor/version.rb` to `1.5.0`. Also, please update the `thor.gemspec` version field to match.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d639e127c5436c87", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:3bc349c947dd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2414387e-296b-4bd4-9abf-1fe2e8da60c0"}}
{"id": "98606c5360d2e1d7", "prompt": "Please run the linter. We're trying to merge this PR and the CI check for rubocop just failed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "98606c5360d2e1d7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:2d69f0232856", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "003cd44c-7d25-4ce6-83a3-c727df2e5976"}}
{"id": "c336d3bc5620eeba", "prompt": "Can you add a benchmark script to measure the parsing performance of Thor::Parser::Arguments? I want to see how long it takes to parse 10k large argument sets before and after the recent optimization PR. Put it in `bin/bench_parse`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c336d3bc5620eeba", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:598a8d1df9db", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b76861d1-0169-4527-9ff3-db09a6376986"}}
{"id": "1eb73ffc4514f6a2", "prompt": "Quick fix: add `frozen_string_literal: true` to `lib/thor/shell/terminal.rb` to match the rest of the project.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1eb73ffc4514f6a2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:141a7b5880b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4f017ce2-26a2-4bda-a5d1-d944e98a47c2"}}
{"id": "b9b4a594c2f3ad78", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing some formatting inconsistencies in `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` compared to the rest of the codebase. Can you run Rubocop on the whole project and auto-correct everything it can? Just commit the changes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b9b4a594c2f3ad78", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:ed23bcb974d5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "768f171e-f170-432a-b3ac-7057c86fa892"}}
{"id": "c8563b5d4bf19a5b", "prompt": "I'm seeing this error when running my CLI:\n\n```\nNoMethodError: undefined method `empty?' for nil:NilClass\n    /lib/thor/parser/argument.rb:45:in `mandatory?'\n    /lib/thor/base.rb:1200:in `default_value'\n```\n\nIt happens when I define a command like:\n\n```ruby\ndef my_command(arg = nil)\n  puts arg\nend\ndef self.all\n  # ...\nend\n```\n\nThe issue seems to be that `defaults` is nil for some reason in the argument parser. Can you investigate `lib/thor/parser/argument.rb`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8563b5d4bf19a5b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:b32e4232a853", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1ec1bcbd-f2b1-407d-950c-d540faf1dc23"}}
{"id": "abc2102650e58a7a", "prompt": "请帮我把 `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` 中的 `invoke` 方法重构一下。现在的代码太长了，可读性很差。提取出验证模板存在的逻辑到私有方法 `validate_template` 中，并添加必要的注释。保持现有的测试用例通过。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "abc2102650e58a7a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:eaa4556f686b", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75127980-e6a8-49a2-884c-24ca30e12515"}}
{"id": "be99b9fab3dc13d9", "prompt": "I just pulled the latest changes including the fixes for the encoding errors (ed9ffca). Can you verify that the changes in lib/thor/shell.rb and lib/thor/shell/basic.rb don't open up any new injection vectors? Specifically check if user input from the terminal is being escaped correctly when outputting to the shell.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "I see you flagged lib/thor/shell/column_printer.rb for potential XSS in HTML mode."}, {"prompt": "Please update lib/thor/shell/html.rb to properly escape user input in the column output."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "be99b9fab3dc13d9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:a102ea6bc9af", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3f3a8ff-273d-426e-9d6a-0a5ca241fe51"}}
{"id": "eb621763e6117d20", "prompt": "Look at recent commits related to encoding errors. In commit 2e2b684, the message says 'fix encoding error when running a merge tool'. Which file did that touch and what was the fix?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eb621763e6117d20", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:25a3ea1d8db2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "37328761-c43d-4180-af27-87023f30cceb"}}
{"id": "34313a0121211fcc", "prompt": "I'm debugging a weird behavior where hidden commands are still showing up in the help text for subcommands. Can you find where the filtering logic for hidden commands lives in the runner or shell code?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "34313a0121211fcc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:98a17c767add", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81cf0d07-0197-47a6-a318-302dbf1a4016"}}
{"id": "b0441e02418412f6", "prompt": "I'm seeing some minor friction in the error messages. Can you update `lib/thor/error.rb` to make the error messages a bit more descriptive when a command is not found?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b0441e02418412f6", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:9e02e72bee91", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "224638f7-7b15-43cb-b539-43c70ef259ec"}}
{"id": "9f2fa023f1c8abfb", "prompt": "I need to implement a custom shell. What's the minimal interface I need to implement from `lib/thor/shell/basic.rb` to make it compatible with the rest of Thor?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9f2fa023f1c8abfb", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:74d76b7df39b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8cbaab0-3659-4745-baad-bf87b03070e5"}}
{"id": "0da4a9c26f1c7d44", "prompt": "spec/parser/option_spec.rb を見て、オプションの定義が正しくパースされているか確認するためのテストケースがどう書かれているか解説して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0da4a9c26f1c7d44", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:cfe62c83a4a0", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "418ee878-3ddb-45b9-a51f-87772e104d18"}}
{"id": "43fcdf68773e7af1", "prompt": "Can you standardize how we handle command descriptions? In `lib/thor/command.rb`, the `description` method accepts a string, but in `lib/thor/group.rb`, groups often just inherit descriptions. Let's add a class-level `desc` method to `Thor::Base` that stores the description in a class variable `@description`, and update `Command#description` to return it. Also, update `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` to use this new accessor when printing help text. I want to remove direct instance variable assignment in the command definitions and use `desc` instead.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "43fcdf68773e7af1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "thor:212d9abc8c5d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa078bbc-1345-46c0-9dd2-0f2c2693aab1"}}
{"id": "d1a3cb6ce6934786", "prompt": "What is the purpose of the NestedContext class? I see it in the lib directory but I can't find much about it in the main wiki.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d1a3cb6ce6934786", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:3b06c36c809f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f43fc90a-9d4b-44a8-98b1-4a6fd7770819"}}
{"id": "0ed3aa33b81a047a", "prompt": "Thor でコマンドを実行する際、lib/thor/runner.rb は具体的にどのような流れで lib/thor/invocation.rb を呼び出しているの？全体像を説明して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "runner.rb 内で、引数が足りない場合にどのようにエラーハンドリングしているか教えて。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ed3aa33b81a047a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:b84838b58598", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a49391a-ebab-4260-8215-d1b9d9452fc1"}}
{"id": "9d794cfc1fa07024", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird issue with `ArgumentError` when running `rake_compat`. Can you find where those errors are raised in `lib/thor/parser/argument.rb` and `lib/thor/parser/options.rb`?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What tests currently cover `ArgumentError` for parsing?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9d794cfc1fa07024", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:6cd1f5aabf7e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b0964a27-207e-4527-b8ab-7073db5c5b40"}}
{"id": "5f5f5e051afdb0fb", "prompt": "revert the last commit because it introduced a regression in the shell terminal output.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5f5f5e051afdb0fb", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:9dcadceb4327", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "704ac55d-ce3c-4aae-8947-6adc013be658"}}
{"id": "5b2afb662df4308c", "prompt": "Can you explain how `Thor::Parser` handles options versus arguments? I'm looking at `lib/thor/parser.rb` and want to understand the separation logic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5b2afb662df4308c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:a6766c6eca90", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb9ed07b-e6ad-4442-a023-80cfb2590e94"}}
{"id": "0ac54dcda94c51a5", "prompt": "I keep accidentally committing my local config files. Please add `*.log`, `tmp/`, and `.rspec_status` to `.gitignore`. Make sure you don't untrack files that are already tracked by git.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0ac54dcda94c51a5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:7fa795138d83", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "29c273c6-1fe1-4b34-9e80-0e9ee9165451"}}
{"id": "78682f3bf71a6f14", "prompt": "The output from `Thor::Shell::TablePrinter` is misaligned when I have columns with mixed ASCII and Unicode characters. It looks like it's doing a simple byte-count or char-count without accounting for display width. \n\nHere is a snippet of the output:\nName              | Status\n-------------------------\nFoo             | ok\nBar             | ok\nBaz with emoji 🚀 | fail\n\nPlease check `lib/thor/shell/table_printer.rb`. I suspect `width` or `pad_to` methods are broken for non-ascii strings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "78682f3bf71a6f14", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:b716ac311427", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "01150423-2032-4c38-849f-481545b31b93"}}
{"id": "1ffdf2d7afca1ad2", "prompt": "The tests in spec/shell_spec.rb are failing with a NameError: uninitialized constant Thor::Shell::ColumnPrinter on Ruby 3.2. It seems like the constant is no longer autoloaded in the same way. Can you check lib/thor/shell.rb and lib/thor/shell/column_printer.rb to see if we need an explicit require or include statement?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1ffdf2d7afca1ad2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:1a4a93dbf250", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ba7626e-9341-4bec-b06f-6d0fe7bf0a8d"}}
{"id": "83e35a80f527a87c", "prompt": "Create a high-level architecture diagram in Mermaid format for the README. I want to show the relationship between Thor::Base, Thor::Runner, and the various Thor::Shell implementations.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you expand the diagram to include how Thor::Parser interacts with Thor::Command?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "83e35a80f527a87c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:332b9aa038fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aed75cf8-0785-412b-9c94-dbbfc17c8ba7"}}
{"id": "2938d38202cfa564", "prompt": "where is the logic for `suppress_command_warnings` defined? I see references to gem-defined methods in recent commits but need to find the actual implementation in the codebase.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2938d38202cfa564", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:534c17bae1a5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a0ca22bf-7858-48a5-803d-2c4ac4f5f9de"}}
{"id": "a0ca10cb073d9eab", "prompt": "I need to debug why `Thor::Shell::Color` isn't outputting ANSI codes on my local machine (macOS 13). Here's the shell output:\n\n```\n$ ruby -e \"require 'thor'; puts Thor::Shell::Color.new.colorize('test', :red)\"\n\"\n```\n\nIt looks like it's returning an empty string. Check relevant files in `lib/thor/shell/`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Thanks, that fixes the local output. Does this change affect the HTML shell output?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a0ca10cb073d9eab", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:0bc26aad4025", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0719fa98-c949-4994-9a24-9e2b63ec9094"}}
{"id": "1eab27f7fbea008c", "prompt": "Check `thor.gemspec`. What is the current version string there? I need to verify it matches the output of `ruby -r thor -e 'puts Thor::VERSION'`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1eab27f7fbea008c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:4462d963631c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8908c58-350c-47c5-a9da-e8cd722263c6"}}
{"id": "1943b5dba5775cd8", "prompt": "Running the tests fails with a weird encoding error in `spec/encoding_spec.rb`:\n\n```\nEncoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible character encodings: UTF-8 and ASCII-8BIT\n```\n\nThis is happening in `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` when it tries to write a file that contains binary data mixed with UTF-8 characters. It looks like it's not preserving the mode or encoding of the original file during copy/create operations. Please check `lib/thor/actions.rb` and `create_file.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1943b5dba5775cd8", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:b42e3cfc3440", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c0541031-95a8-484d-a515-00f2996ece31"}}
{"id": "0e002b17a448521d", "prompt": "In `lib/thor/error.rb`, change the default error message from 'An error occurred' to 'Thor command execution failed'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0e002b17a448521d", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:c010e34ffe3d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aadaff0a-ce2d-4cf9-99f4-f733c9b29303"}}
{"id": "d0b4f60b64256552", "prompt": "I'm trying to use `Thor::Group` to create a base generator, but the invocation system isn't picking up the methods defined on the Group class itself, only the Command class methods.\n\n```ruby\nclass MyGenerator < Thor::Group\n  include Thor::Actions\n  \n  def setup\n    puts \"Setup ran\"\n  end\n  \n  def generate\n    puts \"Generate ran\"\n  end\nend\n```\n\nWhen I run `thor my_generator`, only `generate` runs (because it's the default). `setup` is treated as a private method and ignored.\n\nI thought Thor::Group was supposed to run all public methods in order. Please check `lib/thor/group.rb` and `lib/thor/command.rb` to see why `setup` is being skipped. Is it a visibility issue or a command registration issue?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Fix it so all methods are executed in definition order."}, {"prompt": "Update the documentation or wiki link in README if this is a known limitation vs a bug."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d0b4f60b64256552", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:86a5b3d0406f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "531fc729-7125-433e-a7e5-462685c787f7"}}
{"id": "a58bc65c76ea5e4e", "prompt": "I'm looking at the spec files for the parser. It seems like Arguments and Options are handled in separate classes. Why is that split? Do they share a common base class?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any known edge cases where the separation between argument and option parsing causes issues?"}, {"prompt": "Can you point me to the specific implementation of the Argument class to see its interface?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a58bc65c76ea5e4e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:f5de56b08456", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be7ee111-a335-4933-a96b-f409f0e8fca6"}}
{"id": "6f35e24d5295a8dc", "prompt": "Ich muss verstehen, warum `lib/thor/parser.rb` so umgebaut wurde. Kannst du die Änderungen zwischen den letzten zwei Commits in dieser Datei zeigen?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Gibt es einen Zusammenhang mit den Warnungen in den Tests?"}, {"prompt": "Zeig mir die Commits, die `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` betreffen."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6f35e24d5295a8dc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:10255050a51e", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1d59471b-c1ae-49dd-8a8f-3221a22d82be"}}
{"id": "a72f4ec7495420f1", "prompt": "I'm getting this error when running spec/shell/color_spec.rb:\n\n`NameError: uninitialized constant Thor::Shell::Color::ANSI::SUPPORTED_COLORS`\n\nI just updated my local gemset. Can you check the official ansi gem documentation or GitHub issues to see if the API changed recently? It looks like it's looking for a constant that doesn't exist anymore.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a72f4ec7495420f1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:33b3f493ffe9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5666ce53-653b-4833-9562-15a52a46b6e5"}}
{"id": "8839ae185eaeeff4", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird deprecation warning about 'Gem::Specification' in the test output. Can you check the Ruby 3.4 release notes on ruby-lang.org? I want to see if there are any planned API changes for gem specification handling that might be causing this in our CI.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8839ae185eaeeff4", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:757fc5c36ecb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3e6eb20-df94-4331-b411-4e0bae856d4e"}}
{"id": "1792113922a0c856", "prompt": "Fix the encoding error mentioned in commit 2e2b684. It looks like `lib/thor/actions/directory.rb` is hitting an encoding issue when dealing with non-UTF8 filenames on some systems. Please review the `copy_entry` method and ensure `Encoding.default_external` is handled correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1792113922a0c856", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:36bf27a9f5c0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "824927f3-5a48-499b-90ba-28a8a4d53e99"}}
{"id": "a788dbcbf9cc61b9", "prompt": "The parser seems to be throwing errors on complex nested commands. Can you trace how `lib/thor/runner.rb` invokes the parser and where the error might be surfacing?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a788dbcbf9cc61b9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:529ffdb6d78c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "118f5925-55a3-4eb1-8813-058cfd03234e"}}
{"id": "9369d66fd008e797", "prompt": "There’s a TODO in `lib/thor/actions/directory.rb` about handling symlinks on Windows that’s been there since 2019. I think we can finally address it since Ruby 3+ handles this better. Can you find the TODO and implement a fix that uses `File.symlink` when available and falls back to copying? Please also update `spec/actions/directory_spec.rb` to cover the symlink behavior.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The implementation looks good, but the test is failing because `File.symlink` requires elevated privileges on my local Windows machine (WSL). Can you modify the test to skip if we're on Windows and can't create symlinks?"}, {"prompt": "Great. Now please check if there are any other TODOs in the `lib/thor/actions` directory that are similar low-hanging fruit we should address."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9369d66fd008e797", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:27a0b5d879f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cf75055-1c63-406b-8424-20092005959f"}}
{"id": "ff980a5c784587a8", "prompt": "I'm getting a warning about frozen string literals in lib/thor/shell/color.rb. Can you check which files in lib/thor don't have the frozen_string_literal pragma yet?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ff980a5c784587a8", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:14110525a6ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "405b9137-5909-4faa-a823-cf9a7c00d674"}}
{"id": "32abacb96988cff1", "prompt": "Look at `lib/thor/shell/color.rb`. How are the color constants defined and how do they map to terminal escape codes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "32abacb96988cff1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:fd02633ab8b0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d060097a-323c-45d3-9698-f62dea08baa2"}}
{"id": "97d7937cabe36c6a", "prompt": "DB 컨테이너가 완전히 뜨고 접속 가능한 상태가 될 때까지 대기하는 스크립트가 필요해. 포트 5432가 열릴 때까지 기다리게 해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97d7937cabe36c6a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:7a48af0389ca", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95195d67-6441-46f3-9d5c-424fb43fe6f6"}}
{"id": "0088a7b6857bfc3a", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing some recent commits about Ruby 4.0 support (commit 7b99536). Can you check the Ruby Foundation's current status page or release notes to confirm if Ruby 4.0 is actually released yet? I want to make sure we aren't testing against a non-existent version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0088a7b6857bfc3a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:853568ed0d18", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e6c9b690-8792-411f-a1c1-3bb4c3cf2b62"}}
{"id": "28660ea3e01c9ac5", "prompt": "check the current version of Thor on rubygems.org and tell me if there are any recent security advisories or CVEs associated with the 'thor' gem specifically.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the latest version on GitHub match the one on RubyGems?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any open issues labeled 'security' in the rails/thor repo?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "28660ea3e01c9ac5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:5d280bcc5e93", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9afdb3d6-a513-40c1-99cb-ce7bb7a0e2c8"}}
{"id": "bd8e6ca9fffdfb66", "prompt": "In `thor.gemspec`, update the `add_development_dependency` call for `rspec` to version `~> 3.13`.\n\nAlso, in the `Gemfile`, lock the `rubocop` version to `1.60` specifically so we can control breaking changes manually.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "bd8e6ca9fffdfb66", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:8f271139a97f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3bf11e1-537f-4c11-bec6-bab3fb3769fc"}}
{"id": "51ff36785defcf92", "prompt": "Can you revert the last commit? It broke the `spec/parser/option_spec.rb` tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "51ff36785defcf92", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:c1423b5bf120", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3824ee2-c670-49e0-b275-d1883e3b34a7"}}
{"id": "d4695cd6e8bfe135", "prompt": "Can you draft a release notes entry for a new version of Thor that includes the recent bug fixes in the parser and the encoding improvements? Keep it concise for the GitHub release page.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d4695cd6e8bfe135", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:a397e5d58d37", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a236a46f-3dba-4fd1-89d1-4fe6949cd353"}}
{"id": "dfe321fd0b050f83", "prompt": "grep for TODO: across the lib directory. I want to see how many open tasks are lingering.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dfe321fd0b050f83", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:e409c6fe2a2a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "48b2474a-2c63-49b8-b03e-6a5f00824973"}}
{"id": "aff45a6d4f1b10c7", "prompt": "Can you explain the difference between a Thor Command and a Thor Group? I'm trying to decide how to structure my CLI tool but the documentation feels a bit thin on the practical distinctions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aff45a6d4f1b10c7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:063b3289197f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d7a69b0c-9785-46d2-8f0e-391ba1949f11"}}
{"id": "94043f16eaf75fd4", "prompt": "list all branches", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "94043f16eaf75fd4", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:83902ddef6b2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "91fc8d59-6614-46e3-a68b-912d33b0fe74"}}
{"id": "af2dee079e490d4d", "prompt": "Hey, I noticed in `lib/thor/parser/argument.rb` we're using `ArgumentError` for validation. I recall reading somewhere that Thor changed how it handles invalid arguments in recent versions. Can you look up the current behavior in the online docs or the CHANGELOG? I want to confirm if we should be catching `Thor::Error` instead in the runner. Also, does the wiki have any info on how `Thor::Runner` parses options vs arguments in v1.5+?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "af2dee079e490d4d", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:2588adee6c79", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53e9ec66-f872-400d-b3ad-34c033da6f11"}}
{"id": "5662fb6fe69aaa6c", "prompt": "I need to update the README.md. Can you add a section under 'Usage' that explains how Thor can be used as an alternative to Rake, specifically mentioning its Rake-like syntax?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Add a small code example to that section showing a basic Thor class with a command."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5662fb6fe69aaa6c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:9c3f74b25d9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9fb3c784-2094-4b90-b511-01fcdb7c0167"}}
{"id": "2fea4997bf517a02", "prompt": "lib/thor/parser/options.rb のオプションパースのロジックがどうなってるか教えて。特に、フラグと値の紐付けがどう行われているのか知りたい。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2fea4997bf517a02", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:5cf336e1c506", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d3b7e19f-a4ad-4687-a39d-9c25a5e39fab"}}
{"id": "849c6d8a117556c1", "prompt": "I'm seeing weird behavior where my shell color output is inconsistent between running `thor` directly and when it's invoked via a script. Is Thor's shell detection automatic, or do I need to explicitly set the environment variable? Also, how does `Thor::Shell::Color` determine if it should use colors versus basic output?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` to see how it detects terminal support."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "849c6d8a117556c1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:93ee42df5a60", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "889df0e0-118f-4183-adc2-298e03e6bc43"}}
{"id": "d98107682f8f942f", "prompt": "I want to start refactoring the shell implementation to decouple the logic from the terminal output. \n\n1. Audit `lib/thor/shell/` and identify where we are directly calling terminal-specific methods. \n2. Create a new abstract base class for shells if it doesn't exist, or update `lib/thor/shell/basic.rb` to better define the interface. \n3. Start moving the color logic out of the specific shell implementations and into a more centralized utility. \n\nDon't change any behavior yet, just map out the dependencies and propose a plan in a comment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d98107682f8f942f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "thor:90cd43d22432", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93b2c009-2921-452d-9058-683c74e6ecf0"}}
{"id": "cece07982bec3339", "prompt": "Find all usages of `open-uri` in the codebase. I want to make sure we aren't passing user input directly into it, as per the security warning in the README.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cece07982bec3339", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:2e7bc167e1ef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1f79cefb-cbf0-40d9-ad94-59c86ec8e591"}}
{"id": "1992741aea28495c", "prompt": "Can you go to the thor github wiki page (https://github.com/rails/thor/wiki) and tell me what the latest update to the 'Getting Started' section was? I'm trying to verify if the code examples in the wiki still match the latest v1.5.0 release notes on the main repo page.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1992741aea28495c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:abd72c89542f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "76c3cf2d-ed12-4340-8c89-05bacf551c5c"}}
{"id": "e880b1ca5e4b05aa", "prompt": "Add a new parameter `force` to `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` and ensure it's handled in the method signature.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the specs in `spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb` to cover the new parameter."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e880b1ca5e4b05aa", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:817e394636d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d3152e6a-9a07-4b33-abb9-391a75115458"}}
{"id": "ddc558081bd718f9", "prompt": "What is the recommended pattern for handling complex nested group commands in Thor? I saw a blog post suggesting using `Thor::Group` subclasses, but the official documentation seems sparse on inheritance patterns. Can you find the latest guide on this?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ddc558081bd718f9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:0dd902619cae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dad354bc-6c1d-4bb3-bd43-965da290020d"}}
{"id": "6d21d9c08307d99b", "prompt": "What is the purpose of the `desc` method in Thor? I see it used extensively in the specs but I'm not clear on how it interacts with the `banner` displayed when a user types `thor help`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6d21d9c08307d99b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:1583fef4bead", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3455287b-0ecc-4883-8f87-c301a3b4af70"}}
{"id": "b55044387d0c5fa6", "prompt": "In `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb`, the `#available?` check is duplicated in `#invoke!` and `#revoke!`. Extract this into a protected helper method `check_availability` and call it from both places. If the file doesn't exist when invoking, raise `Thor::Error`. If it does exist when revoking, raise `Thor::Error`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b55044387d0c5fa6", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "thor:0d5ea154671c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cef8bf45-2c78-4fdc-a7ca-8149dcbd7ea3"}}
{"id": "2e6dfbc1d52253d0", "prompt": "bump the version in lib/thor/version.rb to 1.5.0 and update the changelog if there is one.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the tests"}, {"prompt": "Create a git tag"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2e6dfbc1d52253d0", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:6394bb69d0ae", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f4411fc6-da15-4b16-9fe5-05c6d6b7ccb5"}}
{"id": "45b2acda07ee8050", "prompt": "I need to debug why `thor install` is hanging sometimes. Can you start the runner in debug mode and let me know what gets logged when I pass `--backtrace`? Just run `bundle exec thor help` with the debug flags and paste the output here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "45b2acda07ee8050", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:9328c9c25521", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "382935d6-ba8d-4cdc-b6b1-ea4dde98ecea"}}
{"id": "84cb095d45d87b06", "prompt": "Can you look at the file manipulation actions in lib/thor/actions/directory.rb? There's a risk of Arbitrary File Overwrite if the extraction logic doesn't validate paths against the target directory. Please confirm if there's a chroot or path validation mechanism in place.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, I don't see explicit path traversal checks in the `directory` action."}, {"prompt": "Please implement a check in lib/thor/actions/directory.rb to resolve the real path and ensure it stays within the destination directory."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "84cb095d45d87b06", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:c988576b9bd5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ffeba847-89bf-458e-b038-4f0753248890"}}
{"id": "813cb3d1d9ae25fe", "prompt": "refactor lib/thor/shell/color.rb to use frozen string literals at the top of the file", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "commit these changes with a descriptive message"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "813cb3d1d9ae25fe", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:7ee3695c5404", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6163ac88-6a91-4270-9676-c446b5f65de9"}}
{"id": "06dbe2e54b61c8a0", "prompt": "I'm getting an encoding error when running a merge tool. Can you find where file encoding is handled or inferred in the `create_file` action? Specifically looking for where `frozen_string_literal` or encoding detection happens.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Also check if there are any existing tests for encoding in that spec."}, {"prompt": "Show me the relevant lines in lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "06dbe2e54b61c8a0", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:cef88faf8fd6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "083ed60e-5062-4080-bc25-d58d9ed54b2a"}}
{"id": "c4db876d1df04850", "prompt": "Hey, can you run the full spec suite? I'm getting weird failures in CI and want to repro locally. Just `rspec` should do it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c4db876d1df04850", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:99db67a87438", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08cb9c43-00d6-4ca9-b5a8-3624641cb4b1"}}
{"id": "760cfe530010c53a", "prompt": "Can you look up the latest published version of the `rake` gem? I want to know if Thor's `rake_compat` module is still relevant or if we should consider deprecating it in the next major release given the age of the feature.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "760cfe530010c53a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:506a6c4a7d2c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "99b6a769-642e-41f5-8d64-80f25aeec1b6"}}
{"id": "c8a79fedb8edea1e", "prompt": "Can you add a test case to `spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb` that ensures it handles a situation where the target directory doesn't exist?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c8a79fedb8edea1e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:f22cf73b87e6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1402beb4-5d7a-4391-9303-d57d24e6ae85"}}
{"id": "409662b63f396a34", "prompt": "Why does `Thor::Shell::Basic#ask` return `nil` when I press Enter on an empty line if the prompt has a default value? I'd expect it to return the default.\n\nHere is my code:\n\n```ruby\nanswer = ask(\"Enter name [Default]:\", required: false)\nputs \"Result: #{answer.inspect}\"\n```\n\nOutput:\n```\nEnter name [Default]: \nResult: nil\n```\n\nI thought `required: false` meant it accepts empty input, but I specifically want the default string returned if nothing is typed. Check `lib/thor/shell/basic.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "409662b63f396a34", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:ed30483cc165", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e5ad8830-d64e-4dce-a128-f937cf539781"}}
{"id": "2a0576e354425317", "prompt": "Hey, can you help me optimize the Shell::TablePrinter? I noticed that generating output for large tables feels sluggish. Specifically in lib/thor/shell/table_printer.rb, the way we're calculating column widths seems inefficient. Can you refactor it to only calculate widths once per batch instead of per line?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "2a0576e354425317", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:3006030b4d8b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "741628c2-1b6b-4392-b0a2-e6a715c2736c"}}
{"id": "256c67198c062b0b", "prompt": "Ho bisogno di fare un cleanup generale della gestione dei file. Puoi occuparti di queste tre cose: 1) Controlla se ci sono duplicazioni di logica tra `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` e `lib/thor/actions/file_manipulation.rb`. 2) Aggiorna i test in `spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb` per coprire i casi limite che abbiamo discusso. 3) Verifica se `lib/thor/actions/empty_directory.rb` segue lo stesso pattern di errore di `lib/thor/actions/directory.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "256c67198c062b0b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "thor:374b72ddb330", "lang": "it", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1aa581c7-0b6d-4e8a-b6f0-bdf97d241b30"}}
{"id": "f8240c7e19d1223e", "prompt": "There's a regression in 1.5.0 where `Thor::Runner` doesn't properly handle subcommands with hyphens. For example, `thor my-tool:sub_command` fails with an undefined method error.\n\nPlease look at `lib/thor/runner.rb` and `lib/thor/parser.rb`. I suspect the command lookup is splitting incorrectly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f8240c7e19d1223e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:18ec049fdddb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "471b37ba-1992-4497-a6c1-feeb1e5e3f77"}}
{"id": "a3ed4939c0f85e4f", "prompt": "Regarde dans le Gemfile si on peut passer à une version plus récente de rubocop pour améliorer la qualité du code.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a3ed4939c0f85e4f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "thor:b976db9b74ad", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "90aa9ff2-3a7a-4fd6-8f72-b534c10fb70c"}}
{"id": "38544e793f365450", "prompt": "In `spec/helper.rb`, check what constants are being loaded from the `lib` directory. I need a list of all require statements that aren't from the standard library.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "38544e793f365450", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:ef2001cf40aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc44e509-25fd-4267-a39f-a8e593c226cc"}}
{"id": "c99cc70b888e1202", "prompt": "在 `lib/thor/actions/inject_into_file.rb` 中，`invoke_from_source` 方法似乎没有正确处理 `verbose: false` 的情况。我运行测试时看到了多余的输出。请检查并确保当 `verbose` 为 false 时，不会打印注入文件的日志信息。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "运行 spec/actions/inject_into_file_spec.rb 确认修复有效。"}, {"prompt": "请检查一下其他地方是否也有类似的 verbose 检查遗漏。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c99cc70b888e1202", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:f2df5a7703f2", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8a721ed-743f-49be-886e-be7bad62e7da"}}
{"id": "a9361bfd443d8496", "prompt": "Remove the `lib/thor/rake_compat.rb` file as we no longer need Rake compatibility support.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Check if any other files are still requiring rake_compat.rb before deleting it."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9361bfd443d8496", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:fed653d987ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81468014-53c5-4319-8451-7150bec6ccde"}}
{"id": "fe6eb1f52d3582c9", "prompt": "Hey, `Thor::Shell::TablePrinter` is printing columns incorrectly when the content contains ANSI escape codes for colors.\n\nIt calculates column width based on the raw string length including the escape codes, so the text gets shifted right by the length of the color codes.\n\nPlease update `lib/thor/shell/table_printer.rb` to strip ANSI codes when calculating column widths, but keep them in the output.\n\nYou can see this by running:\n\n```ruby\nrequire 'thor'\ninclude Thor::Behavior\ninclude Thor::Actions\n\nclass TestShell < Thor::Shell::Basic\n  def print_line(text)\n    puts \"[#{text}]\" \n  end\nend\n\nclass T < Thor\n  def test_table\n    table = [[\"Name\".color(:red), \"Value\".blue], [\"Item\", 123]]\n    table_print(table)\n  end\nend\n```\n\nThe 'Value' column ends up misaligned.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fe6eb1f52d3582c9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:18fd248e4c70", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b25ac5db-9beb-4487-b140-0c92ff996184"}}
{"id": "c257c26cd12cdbb3", "prompt": "I need to understand how Thor handles command registration when inheriting from a group. Trace the inheritance chain starting from `Thor::Group`.\n\nAlso, find `lib/thor/group.rb` and tell me which methods it overrides from `Thor::Base`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c257c26cd12cdbb3", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:45aba4c45b74", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dbe7693d-2585-43ec-a8ca-faee29758691"}}
{"id": "70275cc16e67603e", "prompt": "Kannst du mir alle Branches auflisten, die nicht 'main' oder 'master' sind?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "70275cc16e67603e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:57637059747d", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8048fad3-77f4-4a48-ad89-dbc83ab93790"}}
{"id": "54e62754e0e0881c", "prompt": "Look at lib/thor/parser/options.rb. How are options parsed when they are passed via the CLI?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a difference in how it handles boolean flags vs values?"}, {"prompt": "Does it support long/short flag aliases?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "54e62754e0e0881c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:1e6e141835a1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b5f61f4f-22f3-488c-a771-63e0f7baf2f1"}}
{"id": "4638a0f2f4a02cd2", "prompt": "I'm seeing an ArgumentError when passing an option with a default value that is a complex object (like a Hash or Array) via the command line parser.\n\n```\n$ thor my_task --option [\"a\",\"b\"]\nArgumentError: invalid value for Option: [\"a\",\"b\"]\n  from lib/thor/parser/option.rb:102:in `check_type'\n```\n\nIt seems `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` is trying to cast the string `[\"a\",\"b\"]` directly to an Array without evaluating it, whereas the shell parses it as a single string argument. The parser in `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` handles arguments correctly by splitting them, but options are failing.\n\nFix this in the option parser so it handles array-like string arguments correctly when `type: :array` is specified.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4638a0f2f4a02cd2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:835b047a1584", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6563a47-5399-4abf-9b50-333312b8843f"}}
{"id": "89a734cd55907fca", "prompt": "Help me locate the configuration for the `readline` line editor. I want to see if there are any defaults set in lib/thor/line_editor/readline.rb and how it falls back to basic.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "89a734cd55907fca", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:e9fb05e9393a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cdfcd56c-2131-4cba-94b3-3ffcb43c9f7f"}}
{"id": "eee6696059566bc3", "prompt": "Je ne suis pas sûr de la compatibilité de notre version actuelle de thor.gemspec avec Ruby 3.3. Peux-tu vérifier si on doit ajouter des dépendances spécifiques ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eee6696059566bc3", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "thor:4c402f8f9db4", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02db5063-891d-4b21-b938-99aa9251fc09"}}
{"id": "cbea26c87cd53fdc", "prompt": "Refactor `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` to use Ruby's keyword arguments for the `initialize` method. Currently it relies on a large positional hash argument. Change the signature to `def initialize(name, type = :string, required: false, desc: nil, ...)` and update all call sites in `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` and `lib/thor/invocation.rb` to use the new keyword-style initialization. Don't worry about backward compatibility with the old hash style for now; this is a clean break.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Let me know if `lib/thor/rake_compat.rb` also instantiates Options directly."}, {"prompt": "Run the parser specs."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cbea26c87cd53fdc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "thor:8a8d84a6d462", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7436e95-5cd8-49dd-941d-d67b0c7ec449"}}
{"id": "5e196db9226d356f", "prompt": "테스트 서버가 빌드 완료될 때까지 기다렸다가, 완료되면 자동으로 브라우저 띄워주는 명령어로 구성해줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e196db9226d356f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:be36a9ee153a", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cb2aea49-5660-47da-b605-fede8b5fbfca"}}
{"id": "4cbcdd44a090e7ce", "prompt": "Add a `description` parameter to the `Thor::Command` initializer in `lib/thor/command.rb` and update the class to accept it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4cbcdd44a090e7ce", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:8854a609a0f9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5d86401a-1fb2-4a2d-8ea5-56ed755274bc"}}
{"id": "a08fbb7582fdf096", "prompt": "I'm getting a weird error in `spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb` when testing large file buffers. Can you take a look?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Looks good. Amend the last commit to include this fix and update the docstring."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a08fbb7582fdf096", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:37247c381272", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7511761b-4d94-46f1-adf1-ddd1d0620aef"}}
{"id": "a90bec60b546272b", "prompt": "Quick question: how does `lib/thor/core_ext/hash_with_indifferent_access.rb` work? Is it just a wrapper around standard Hash or does it implement its own key lookup logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a90bec60b546272b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:c924774a5619", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "69bda7ad-60c1-48a1-b15e-13fce84999ee"}}
{"id": "764a497edcf7d33c", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand how `Thor::Base` handles inheritance. Show me where the `register` method is defined and what it does with the command.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "764a497edcf7d33c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:184aaaf6c977", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "75bca2c0-a895-4ef4-8fae-b5884b3d2769"}}
{"id": "b27ac12a02d178af", "prompt": "How does Thor handle argument parsing compared to OptionParser? I'm used to writing verbose option definitions. Is Thor just a wrapper around it, or does it reimplement the parsing logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b27ac12a02d178af", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:73abf3550332", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6988f4c7-a3e2-4222-b7c2-92176477bf5f"}}
{"id": "90e8aaf4209824ad", "prompt": "Find all `TODO` and `FIXME` comments in the `lib/` directory. I want to know how many there are and which files they are in so I can plan my next sprint.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "For the ones in `lib/thor/runner.rb`, can you show me the surrounding context for each?"}, {"prompt": "Create a GitHub issue for each TODO found."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "90e8aaf4209824ad", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:42c02e758bfe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f8594507-2f10-4bac-917c-66f8ab04b34d"}}
{"id": "8476b54c64683f56", "prompt": "Clean up `lib/thor/util.rb` by removing any unused private methods.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8476b54c64683f56", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:de6dd00ef682", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "47fb5033-cbf6-44e5-ae7a-818c6d2d57ec"}}
{"id": "87e07a79e6cf48cd", "prompt": "I need to verify the status of the open-uri dependency mentioned in the README security note. Can you fetch the latest documentation or changelog for Ruby's standard library 'open-uri' to see if there are any new vulnerabilities reported in the last 6 months?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "87e07a79e6cf48cd", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:2d33acaa1579", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d802d1b4-9c62-4713-81aa-7d3be52a0477"}}
{"id": "20421c35123100d7", "prompt": "The exit code logic in `Thor::Runner` is inconsistent when a subcommand fails.\n\nIn `bin/thor`, if I run a command that returns `exit(1)`, the shell script exits with 0. It should propagate the exit code.\n\nHere is the relevant snippet:\n\n```bash\nruby lib/thor.rb my_task\n``` \n\n`my_task` calls `exit(1)`.\n\nThe issue seems to be that `Thor::Runner` catches Interrupt/Exception but swallows the exit status. Please fix `lib/thor/runner.rb` to ensure the process exit code matches the value passed to `exit`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "20421c35123100d7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:80c3ae9e9fb8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7b2f65e-6b9a-4fd7-8e86-9ef43dbaa65e"}}
{"id": "932e34ad9e3c557f", "prompt": "We are seeing a deprecation warning in Ruby 3.2 regarding `File.expand_path` in `lib/thor/util.rb`. The warning says 'Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated'. Does the Ruby 3.2 migration guide or standard library docs recommend an alternative for resolving paths relative to the script root in a way that's safe across Ruby 2.7+ and 3.x?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "932e34ad9e3c557f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:146ce1d6e459", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4e88ad40-ce0d-4467-bc03-599350664df3"}}
{"id": "acd3d544e2184e5b", "prompt": "I want to suppress the default Thor banner that prints usage information when an unknown option is passed. I saw a commit about suppressing warnings from gem-defined methods. Is there a simple config option for this in the runner or shell?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "acd3d544e2184e5b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:59e4b24970e0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "aacb7580-3083-4794-9b96-5d4a57053ef4"}}
{"id": "e7442d5758fa3351", "prompt": "Check mal `lib/thor/actions/inject_into_file.rb` mit git blame. Wer ist für die Zeile verantwortlich, die den File-Content schreibt?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e7442d5758fa3351", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:74eb0ede1510", "lang": "de", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fec19048-648f-450c-84ca-574c66b5c365"}}
{"id": "92556fb4bb3e903a", "prompt": "I noticed Thor uses Open-URI for file and URL access. You mentioned in the README that this is a security risk if used with user input. Can you clarify exactly what vectors are open if I'm not careful? I'm building a tool that downloads templates.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "92556fb4bb3e903a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:10466c8ba0d4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "673fec4d-d6bb-4d89-aa42-750e5eacd1a2"}}
{"id": "aca2e61d2cd5e346", "prompt": "我在运行 `thor list` 时遇到了一个奇怪的错误，输出如下：\n\n```\nNoMethodError: undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass\n  from lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb:45:in `block in parse'\n```\n\n这通常发生在子命令没有定义任何参数时。看起来 `arguments` 数组可能是 nil。请帮我修复 `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` 中的解析逻辑，使其能安全地处理空参数列表。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "aca2e61d2cd5e346", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:bbbd890a1edd", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d48b6a35-8b7d-47fc-a539-ccd87fd4f5aa"}}
{"id": "5cfd8f3bcb5ef5b7", "prompt": "git stash my current changes in `lib/thor/shell/color.rb`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5cfd8f3bcb5ef5b7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:dd3984403478", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "239ed523-89f4-4cea-9463-e659820eee46"}}
{"id": "63a64c297389bf97", "prompt": "Run rubocop on the entire lib/thor directory. I know we have strict rules in .rubocop.yml, so just fix the offenses without asking me for permission to change style rules.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Did rubocop pass now?"}, {"prompt": "Run the full test suite to ensure no regressions."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63a64c297389bf97", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:7cfbcd6e2cef", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "44407937-9313-4dd0-be4c-a0d82bbf7db4"}}
{"id": "762bd454ac96dfb1", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify lib/thor/shell/color.rb and what was their reasoning?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "762bd454ac96dfb1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:e24e0d765034", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2746dc3-3af6-4ac5-a5f9-c0666191227e"}}
{"id": "a870e0bf11e38d24", "prompt": "The error message in `lib/thor/error.rb` for missing arguments is a bit cryptic. Can we change it to: 'Error: The required argument %{arg} is missing'?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a870e0bf11e38d24", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:fff2b5895e2b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "641c63ea-bf2d-4a9a-82b2-38fa4a2db8ff"}}
{"id": "2429f6dc82c677f9", "prompt": "lib/thor/shell/color.rb で定義されている色の処理が、他の shell クラスでどう利用されているか教えて。特に lib/thor/shell/basic.rb との関係性が知りたい。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "ターミナルが色に対応していない場合に、どうやって出力を制御しているか教えて。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2429f6dc82c677f9", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:c5c58fe54bfe", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba05513c-3dff-4044-a1db-98ab736d2f76"}}
{"id": "f39daaf278d5440f", "prompt": "I'm trying to migrate our CI from Ruby 2.7 to 3.1. I found a note in the Thor release notes that mentions `Thor::Util` changes. Can you point me to the specific migration guide or changelog entry for Thor 1.3.0 regarding `instance_eval` behavior? I'm getting weird scope errors in our subcommands.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f39daaf278d5440f", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:81ffdc389710", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1db3db05-b831-4836-9bec-f6e08636c9f9"}}
{"id": "a6169aa018e6c2cc", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of `if defined?(readline) ... else ... end` blocks across `lib/thor/line_editor/basic.rb` and `lib/thor/line_editor/readline.rb`. Can you centralize the line editor selection logic into `lib/thor/line_editor.rb`? Create a `self.select_editor` class method that returns the appropriate editor class, and have `base.rb` use that instead of the inline checks. Keep the logic for choosing Readline if available, falling back to Basic otherwise.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a6169aa018e6c2cc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "thor:8212ca507fa2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "70ec6d93-6b88-487c-8c18-06fe5fe3c35b"}}
{"id": "47c10f8e4ed177e1", "prompt": "I just realized I messed up the last commit. Can you amend the previous commit to include the missing documentation in README.md?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "47c10f8e4ed177e1", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:3a2667f4a947", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ef69afa4-8e75-4c65-aca6-b103ec933446"}}
{"id": "5a8a3040603e20fb", "prompt": "Scan the lib directory for any hardcoded secrets, API keys, or tokens. Also look at the spec files to ensure no test secrets are committed in plain text. We had a scare last sprint with a config file leaking.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5a8a3040603e20fb", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:7c380af4e743", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ab06ca12-7c55-4de1-b348-8d3c5b5a55b2"}}
{"id": "75009d87630faf32", "prompt": "Can you check if the gem builds correctly? Run `gem build thor.gemspec` and let me know if there are any errors or warnings. Also, quickly check if the tests pass locally.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "75009d87630faf32", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:523775f745d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "94febdad-5cbe-429b-afa3-d6b64a138209"}}
{"id": "30889ea0a52b6940", "prompt": "在 `lib/thor/core_ext/hash_with_indifferent_access.rb` 中，`[]=` 方法在设置符号键时似乎没有正确转换为字符串键，导致与 `OptionParser` 的结果不一致。请修复此行为，确保无论传入 Symbol 还是 String 键，底层存储都保持一致。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "30889ea0a52b6940", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:618b3cbcf353", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ea4fb5a8-4ef1-42d2-99cf-31a780c0ddc2"}}
{"id": "b73518051faf07a5", "prompt": "Check the official Rails documentation for `ActionView::Base`. We're seeing deprecation warnings about passing a block to `render` that includes instance variables. Does the current guide recommend using `local_assigns` instead? I saw something about this in the Rails 7.1 release notes but want to be sure about the recommended pattern.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b73518051faf07a5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:b5fa91a652ce", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fbd9d04a-6f0f-482c-8244-977792bb342f"}}
{"id": "0dbc5c725ed08738", "prompt": "Parse Gemfile and tell me the count of unique gem sources currently defined.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0dbc5c725ed08738", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:643f26e1c22f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d3766ad-937f-45bd-ab94-b50bfd72d32d"}}
{"id": "1bb9dee942d9a9d3", "prompt": "I'm looking at `lib/thor/shell.rb` and it seems to be handling output formatting. Can you check the official Thor wiki or documentation for the latest recommended way to customize the shell interface? I want to make sure I'm implementing `ask` and `say` correctly according to the current v1.5.0 standards. Specifically, is there a guide on overriding the prompt character?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1bb9dee942d9a9d3", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:f17aa5b6089a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8b1f2462-5760-4616-a508-f8ee262ff7fe"}}
{"id": "75e4646c2551a421", "prompt": "where's the retry logic for the line reader?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "75e4646c2551a421", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:5e0adf800515", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d62e1acd-150c-4d28-8491-36c3198f8c01"}}
{"id": "e6b035b86034163e", "prompt": "Show me the diff of what changed on main since yesterday. I missed the merge yesterday.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e6b035b86034163e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:473452ca024d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c7f21b6c-b81b-4fdc-8531-975ec4f3a58f"}}
{"id": "e6c7223e847f9c6b", "prompt": "Refactor lib/thor/parser/option.rb to use the new `Keyword.new` interface if it exists, otherwise stick to the current initialization but ensure we remove the deprecated `:required => true` syntax in favor of `required: true`. Update the corresponding specs in spec/parser/option_spec.rb to enforce this.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run rubocop to check for style violations."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e6c7223e847f9c6b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:daf51a5cd949", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "35b04258-c2e0-4fcf-9ba3-7049ebbd39f4"}}
{"id": "f669ae7b6078f2be", "prompt": "check git blame lib/thor/base.rb:15", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f669ae7b6078f2be", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:6120e146849c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b86d6b7-0cca-4749-afbe-5ab0804eb0d8"}}
{"id": "d8418d3e0519dfdc", "prompt": "I'm trying to get the CI to pass locally before I push. Can you please run the RSpec suite for me? I see a few failures in `spec/shell_spec.rb` and `spec/runner_spec.rb` that seem unrelated to my changes but I want to make sure the baseline is green. Use `bundle exec rspec` to run the full suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d8418d3e0519dfdc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:58d1194ca8bb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02f77bda-7a8e-43ae-94e8-081b7304c9e4"}}
{"id": "b848e6a3c75d7f16", "prompt": "Write a brief changelog entry for a hypothetical v1.6.0 that marks the completion of the new line_editor features. Reference lib/thor/line_editor/basic.rb and lib/thor/line_editor/readline.rb.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b848e6a3c75d7f16", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:276ca14d933c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "31fcb26a-187e-42ba-b91f-e70a7a141770"}}
{"id": "b94969ed713cd0ae", "prompt": "Add 'log/' to .gitignore. I keep committing build artifacts by accident.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b94969ed713cd0ae", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:003e14f641f4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bfb2c7b7-3aa5-4a3d-9b39-d3442a90d07e"}}
{"id": "1093dc3082c87a5b", "prompt": "Please update the .document file (if it exists or create a template) to outline the internal module structure of Thor, specifically how the actions in lib/thor/actions/ are mixed into the main classes.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1093dc3082c87a5b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:817b82521a60", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bd94b945-f5d9-40aa-9735-65b3a0ebcfc1"}}
{"id": "f62a662bebaed611", "prompt": "where's the code that parses command line arguments? I need to add a new option type.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Look at `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` and `lib/thor/parser/argument.rb`. What's the difference in how they handle validation?"}, {"prompt": "Check `spec/parser/option_spec.rb` for examples of custom validation logic."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f62a662bebaed611", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:266629b1f7a2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4be7064d-56f0-4c24-b54c-28113565eb5c"}}
{"id": "a9687c0921fdf9b2", "prompt": "Look at .rspec. I want to enable the `--fail-fast` option if it isn't already there. Check if it's conditionally applied or just add it to the main array.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Wait, ignore that, I didn't mean to change the config."}, {"prompt": "Actually, just make sure `--color` is still in there too."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a9687c0921fdf9b2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:111461b6fe57", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a3558a8a-23a9-4492-aa6a-000e174109ea"}}
{"id": "dce10395e9babfc2", "prompt": "I need to trace where the `Shell::Color` class is extended in the main runner. Find the code that includes it and tell me which file it's in.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dce10395e9babfc2", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:955301823492", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "98a1f47a-390e-46e3-bf3b-d17c13944559"}}
{"id": "755d9764c13afe62", "prompt": "Where is the logic for `Thor::Actions#create_file` actually implemented? I need to trace how it handles the `force` option.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also show me where this method is called in the spec files?"}, {"prompt": "Are there any other files that override or wrap this behavior?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "755d9764c13afe62", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:18639c1bb8d1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f5a2235c-4652-48d7-9f88-1c52a0f1dab2"}}
{"id": "842ebcae850a405b", "prompt": "I'm trying to implement a color-coded output for my CLI. I see there's a Thor::Shell::Color class. Is it automatically used if the terminal supports colors, or do I need to explicitly configure it?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "842ebcae850a405b", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:fc686f44709a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b538dad7-4d04-4d9d-903d-11014dd6df79"}}
{"id": "75d27ed9dbb3597c", "prompt": "Hey, I'm seeing encoding errors when running merge tools. \n\n```\nEncoding::UndefinedConversionError: \\x80 from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8\n```\n\nCan you check the recent commits for anything related to encoding fixes? Specifically look at commit `ed9ffca` or similar. Which file did it modify?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "75d27ed9dbb3597c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:2ff20391aa2f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be1b716b-ab57-46ef-9b8a-9647284dc7aa"}}
{"id": "607ba9e08a6d7d93", "prompt": "Peux-tu vérifier si une mise à jour des dépendances dans le Gemfile pourrait casser quoi que ce soit ? Regarde surtout les versions actuelles par rapport aux dernières releases.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "607ba9e08a6d7d93", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "thor:346e3467a71a", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b880c357-8f60-4d23-b522-d0e0914a35f2"}}
{"id": "3cf959bb7cf9e1a5", "prompt": "Add a simple regression test for `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` to make sure color codes are being stripped correctly when not in a TTY environment.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3cf959bb7cf9e1a5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:d5fe7b9e147c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a6486e3b-9956-413d-abc8-55f99221c2ec"}}
{"id": "6f385ef85109e31e", "prompt": "Refactor `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` to use the new `Argument` class structure we discussed. Make sure all existing specs in `spec/parser/` still pass after you're done.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6f385ef85109e31e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "thor:fbe90f36c568", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "52c07704-f33f-4db9-acdf-c8e8b3df8b3c"}}
{"id": "0c74526816e489cc", "prompt": "According to the official Ruby documentation for `FileUtils`, does `FileUtils.rm_rf` guarantee that broken symlinks are removed safely on all platforms? I'm seeing inconsistent behavior in `spec/actions/create_link_spec.rb` where sometimes the link isn't cleaned up before the file is removed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0c74526816e489cc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:66aa360aed2d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93a1223a-e891-4661-acb2-881c30b333eb"}}
{"id": "54b90108d9f01d39", "prompt": "fix: Thor::Action::CreateFile fails on Windows paths\n\nWhen I try to run the tests locally (Windows 11, Ruby 3.2), I'm getting this:\n\n  1) Failures:\n     1) Thor::Actions::CreateFile#create_file creates file with correct permissions\n        Failure/Error: File.chmod(mode, @file.path)\n        Errno::ENOENT: No such file or directory @ chmod_apply - /C:/Users/test/file.txt\n\nIt seems `@file.path` is coming back as an absolute Windows path but `File.chmod` isn't liking it. Check spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb for context.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run only the create_file_spec.rb tests to verify the fix."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "54b90108d9f01d39", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "thor:2c52ee6c6fac", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95839ed2-89e3-4295-b13e-cccdca0bd6ba"}}
{"id": "980a1658bab942c3", "prompt": "Exécute un audit de sécurité sur les dépendances du projet. Je veux être sûr qu'on n'a pas de vulnérabilités critiques.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "980a1658bab942c3", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "thor:eed9d94f77a1", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e65ed2e-e5d4-48d3-b056-25e8721265dd"}}
{"id": "a4b274d5b93d590d", "prompt": "How does Thor handle argument parsing when a subcommand is involved? Specifically, does it parse arguments for the parent command before passing remaining args to the subcommand, or is it entirely separate? I want to understand the precedence of options vs arguments in nested group structures.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me an example in `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` where it decides which arguments belong to the current command versus passing them down?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a4b274d5b93d590d", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:db1f919449cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "84913ffd-868c-4de0-90de-863b8663a810"}}
{"id": "719db0a97e54fb75", "prompt": "Add a test case to `spec/actions/create_file_spec.rb` to ensure it handles writing to a directory that doesn't exist yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "719db0a97e54fb75", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:328eadbd1ea0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "69d98d50-fa4d-4150-877f-cbc5e72c521d"}}
{"id": "f1640200a2cfe6f6", "prompt": "Add a `description` parameter to the `Thor::Command` initializer in `lib/thor/command.rb`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f1640200a2cfe6f6", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "thor:68ecdb6fc723", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "535a7dea-b300-48de-b2b5-42d9d5350fb9"}}
{"id": "20d35e8777cd9e6e", "prompt": "Analyze `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb`. Count the number of public instance methods defined directly in this class (excluding inherited ones).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "20d35e8777cd9e6e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:af0521a91bbd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c34e61c4-bcc1-42fd-aa4c-e22cee990aae"}}
{"id": "15c9e8cadd44b3ab", "prompt": "lib/thor/base.rb のクラスメソッドの定義について。コマンドとして登録される仕組みを、lib/thor/command.rb と紐付けて説明して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "15c9e8cadd44b3ab", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:5da997ef6ce7", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a1caf59f-e374-4af8-9b56-5569f2ff3dee"}}
{"id": "95d92b1e626d521c", "prompt": "Just did a pull and saw commit d89dd2 which is 'Suppress false positive warnings from gem-defined methods'. Can you check if there are any open issues or PRs on the rubygems/rubygems repository linked to this change? I want to see if the patch I'm looking at in Thor is upstreamed there yet.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "95d92b1e626d521c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:94669501375c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d33ab3a-873a-4054-9c1b-cc3ab2e115dc"}}
{"id": "df970517f16d75ae", "prompt": "I need to implement a subcommand structure where the main command is `myapp` and subcommands are `myapp build` and `myapp deploy`. How should I structure the class hierarchy and the Thorfile to support this without duplicating the runner logic?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the subcommand class need to inherit from Thor or Thor::Group?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "df970517f16d75ae", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:a34b535826fb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e07c1e60-182f-4f49-ba62-9893815f225c"}}
{"id": "8cc6d6c37794e95a", "prompt": "i need to work on a new feature for the parser. create a new branch called feature/parser-enhancements and switch to it", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8cc6d6c37794e95a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:60be6e273969", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2a5cbbe-a5a4-4d10-8465-f513ff8522eb"}}
{"id": "8ed4011fe312a701", "prompt": "Is Thor thread-safe? I'm considering using Thor as a library within a multithreaded web server to generate some CLI-like output in the background. Are there any shared states or global variables I should avoid?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8ed4011fe312a701", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:b561b86f0f6d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50c33681-fc45-4b7f-b469-7e162fc35914"}}
{"id": "3afddd6694ce3290", "prompt": "The `Thor::Util` module is leaking constants into the main namespace when using `namespace` separators in commands.\n\nIf I define:\n\n```ruby\nclass MyApp < Thor\n  desc \"sub create\", \"Create something\"\n  def create; end\nend\n```\n\nAnd then access `MyApp.commands`, I'm seeing entries with keys like `\"sub:create\"` but also some internal keys like `\"Thor::Actions\"` or `\"Thor::CoreExt\"` appearing in the keys hash.\n\nCheck `lib/thor/util.rb`, specifically the `find_command` and `namespaced_command` methods. It looks like the constant lookup is registering unwanted namespaces.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3afddd6694ce3290", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:91abd0ad416d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7df3097d-49ff-4d55-aba6-704a4dadea57"}}
{"id": "6d7c450a277bc9f5", "prompt": "Quick question: What's the recommended way to handle command line argument parsing for boolean flags in Ruby 3.2+? I'm looking at the `Thor::Parser::Argument` class. Is there a standard library feature or a specific gem like `optimist` that's now preferred over Thor's built-in parser for complex boolean logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6d7c450a277bc9f5", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:a67b04bfb6b5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a815797a-4689-4b71-b0d0-bd93f02660e0"}}
{"id": "9ef69532ec6a8166", "prompt": "Show me the diff for commit 0eaec10.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9ef69532ec6a8166", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "thor:227a9e2b5b25", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "334ff83c-c81e-4058-8bb2-0eb3acba0e45"}}
{"id": "36dd745d865fc017", "prompt": "run the tests in spec/parser/options_spec.rb. if they pass, stash my current progress so I can switch back to main for a hotfix", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "36dd745d865fc017", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "thor:efcc79ad5437", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fb321b51-f033-496d-8e59-e1693b47f8e6"}}
{"id": "9be10c6e50984af8", "prompt": "I'm seeing some weird behavior with file creation. How does `lib/thor/actions/create_file.rb` handle existing files? Does it skip them or overwrite?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9be10c6e50984af8", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "thor:ea2dc5b749fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e0f41064-733e-40af-ae74-c4f4dccbcf80"}}
{"id": "7716f2d3c1857f63", "prompt": "The CONTRIBUTING.md is looking a bit thin. Could you add a section about our testing standards, specifically mentioning that we use RSpec and that all new actions need corresponding specs in spec/actions/?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7716f2d3c1857f63", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "thor:0dc5cf43cd3e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "91c8749c-3bcc-4410-a957-073ab3cf850f"}}
{"id": "1402beb728b4a74c", "prompt": "현재 실행 중인 Docker 컨테이너 목록 다 뽑아보고, 메모리 점유율 높은 순서대로 정리해서 보여줘.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1402beb728b4a74c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "thor:2d0bb6735107", "lang": "ko", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d8a08ef8-25ae-413a-b7a2-040edf7ebdaa"}}
{"id": "c7fd59ece297399e", "prompt": "Hi, I ran `bandit` or similar static analysis on the repo and got some false positives on the Thorfile and bin/thor. Can you help me triage these findings? The report flagged dynamic eval usage in lib/thor/runner.rb. Is this actually vulnerable or a known pattern for command parsing?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c7fd59ece297399e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:fa63a4832689", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40573c4e-d93e-4333-bacb-5a2a87dcf770"}}
{"id": "44014e66c2e1ce0e", "prompt": "I'm seeing a warning in the CI logs about `Thor::Shell::ColumnPrinter`. Can you grep through `lib/thor/shell/` to count how many printer classes exist?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "44014e66c2e1ce0e", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "thor:8254aedfbd4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "effe6075-51cf-4ade-aaa5-18db9a9e1a9e"}}
{"id": "a7e8332d7d52239c", "prompt": "I need to find where `Thor::Error` is raised. Show me all the places in the codebase that throw an error instance, not just the definition.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a7e8332d7d52239c", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "thor:0c2d5627b738", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a7696dc-e777-4730-ba30-973aeafcbf49"}}
{"id": "92e67b12bfd01ae7", "prompt": "We're seeing some weirdness with how arguments are being parsed in nested contexts. Can you look into `lib/thor/parser/` and `lib/thor/nested_context.rb`? \n\nSpecifically:\n- Check if `lib/thor/parser/arguments.rb` handles unexpected trailing options correctly.\n- Verify that `lib/thor/nested_context.rb` preserves option state when switching contexts.\n- Run the tests in `spec/parser/` and `spec/nested_context_spec.rb` to see if we can reproduce any inconsistencies.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The nested context seems to be losing the 'no-color' flag. Trace how options are passed from `lib/thor/runner.rb` down through the parser to the nested context."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "92e67b12bfd01ae7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "thor:7782de9a6f4f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b18f55b1-4e0f-4f8f-bd83-999e79bdaefb"}}
{"id": "5818610384528c0a", "prompt": "I'm refactoring a Thor task. I have two different groups: one for 'build' tasks and one for 'deploy' tasks. Both define a command called 'start'. If I invoke `thor start` from the runner, how does Thor decide which `start` command to execute? Is it alphabetical or based on registration order?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5818610384528c0a", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "thor:431a37639c22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f8e6de9-33ec-4540-abcc-538954f6dde9"}}
{"id": "ee358e95e4f729cd", "prompt": "我们需要修复 `lib/thor/shell/color.rb` 中的颜色重置问题。在某些终端模拟器中，如果命令抛出异常，颜色代码没有被正确重置，导致后续输出的文本颜色错乱。请在 `reset` 方法中增加对 ANSI 重置代码的确保执行。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "更新 spec/shell/color_spec.rb 以覆盖异常场景。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ee358e95e4f729cd", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "thor:1bc727bd284c", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6fd839c4-f463-43d0-a423-4ff1c080451a"}}
{"id": "cf57ed46a0e712e7", "prompt": "The `lib/thor/util.rb` file has a `find_gem_path` method that is used in three places: runner, shell, and actions. It currently returns a string, but we need it to return a Pathname object for consistency with other file operations. Update `find_gem_path` to use `Pathname.new` and update all three call sites to handle it accordingly. Then run the spec suite to ensure nothing broke.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is `lib/thor/actions/file_manipulation.rb` using this too?"}, {"prompt": "Check `spec/util_spec.rb`."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf57ed46a0e712e7", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "thor:25f89e97a5f5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64465ce4-415b-4011-9ae2-31027bde605d"}}
{"id": "f8dd4de9743b0da8", "prompt": "We are preparing for a compliance audit. I need a review of how `lib/thor/parser/option.rb` and `lib/thor/parser/argument.rb` handle type casting. Are there any ways to inject Ruby code through the argument parsing layer? The docs say 'not receive application user input' but I want to be 100% sure the parser itself is safe.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f8dd4de9743b0da8", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "thor:c687a9a6a707", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "78cfc8b2-12b2-434e-938a-78344dd8b0fd"}}
{"id": "5ab19349fb5540dc", "prompt": "Hey, what changed in the `dry-initializer` library between v2.1.0 and v3.0.0? I'm seeing build failures in CI related to method signatures in my custom thor groups. I know Thor doesn't depend on it directly, but we have a dev dependency and I want to make sure our usage aligns with the latest API.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5ab19349fb5540dc", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "thor:faac66c45ade", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f85ae112-a6c2-4694-8f8e-c10e3b39282a"}}
{"id": "eb18a6aec69dddba", "prompt": "There's a security note in the README about open-uri and command injection. Can you check the current NVD (National Vulnerability Database) website for CVEs related to 'open-uri ruby'? I want to know if there are any known critical vulnerabilities I should be aware of before merging this PR.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eb18a6aec69dddba", "repo": "thor", "split": "train", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "thor:ae97bd3d4a77", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "thor-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1bc62a29-3db6-4152-ae30-222fb47ff8d0"}}
{"id": "d8e06e1f55bc80e5", "prompt": "扫描整个仓库，找出所有包含 hardcoded credentials 或者 private keys 的地方。特别是 `packages/docs` 和 `scripts` 目录。另外检查 `.env` 文件是否被正确忽略在 `.gitignore` 里了。如果有泄露风险，列出受影响的具体文件路径。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d8e06e1f55bc80e5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:9900a55ef7b0", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e54cccfd-4c42-4f74-be77-ed5b460e99a2"}}
{"id": "9e1e418f18b81a81", "prompt": "Clean build artifacts from dist/, node_modules, and .next directories. Then show me the current repo size.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9e1e418f18b81a81", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:8003c7c30fcd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fba41fd3-18b9-45b5-9d8a-8ce0995dd86d"}}
{"id": "de3f64b184be08c0", "prompt": "Show me the diff between commit 12e6272 and d6bc1e3.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "de3f64b184be08c0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:69db5c549d71", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ba53c397-9522-4eba-ba8f-fc852476179e"}}
{"id": "7098e762d6edb428", "prompt": "please start the docs dev server and let me know when it's up. i need to check the new 'properties' section in the docs to make sure the Zod Mini tab renders correctly.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7098e762d6edb428", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:ea6c5139b642", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a8cdb3a1-c160-4c0e-97af-574d731b9a5d"}}
{"id": "ad23c66197a5d7fd", "prompt": "Quick question on performance. I'm seeing a significant increase in memory usage when using `z.infer` vs `z.output` on large nested objects.\n\nIs there a known bug where the type inference hangs or consumes too much memory for schemas deeper than 5-6 levels? My IDE (VS Code) becomes unresponsive for about 10 seconds when I hover over the type.\n\nSchema depth example:\n```ts\nconst Address = z.object({ line1: z.string() });\nconst Company = z.object({ address: Address, ... });\n// nested 6 deep...\n```\n\nNot sure if this is a TypeScript compiler limit or a Zod issue specifically.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ad23c66197a5d7fd", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:a177a5edcfca", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "93151958-6349-4533-bd54-8832a6f60467"}}
{"id": "8fda7e2a885d46ea", "prompt": "In `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts`, change the error message for 'too_short' to be more descriptive. It should say 'String must contain at least {count} character(s)' instead of the current version.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8fda7e2a885d46ea", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:98f16f964098", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d76a4b12-5ceb-4047-a3b9-05e0fd8d5946"}}
{"id": "13749ed7a068b081", "prompt": "We need to move towards more modern linting. Can you audit `packages/docs/biome.jsonc` and see if we can add any stricter rules for our React components in `packages/docs/components/`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "13749ed7a068b081", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "zod:ad95c014a6a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "faa161eb-f3bd-4eac-b785-d1c0eb30334c"}}
{"id": "fdd86eb5c1ca098a", "prompt": "packages/docs/components/silver.tsx を削除して、代わりに packages/docs/components/featured.tsx を使うようにドキュメント側を修正したい。どこを直すべきか教えて。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "fdd86eb5c1ca098a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:bddac22f6766", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-000", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "28ccf8f2-fbe0-470d-a70b-ee8e5ad8849e"}}
{"id": "abf873d4b72915e5", "prompt": "Preciso dar um bump na versão do `packages/zod`. Muda para 4.6.9-next.1 e atualiza o changelog se tiver espaço, mas só adiciona uma linha genérica tipo 'bugfixes'.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "abf873d4b72915e5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:f8dc14fb8359", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "81777311-7864-45bd-936f-f26c0f8fc3b6"}}
{"id": "759aa17cb2bd73f8", "prompt": "run the full test suite for packages/zod", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If string.test.ts fails, paste the error diff here."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "759aa17cb2bd73f8", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:203bf40f4356", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "44bb97b1-ba33-49e9-8ad3-3c529f5cf69d"}}
{"id": "3d5d7e1aa5e5d441", "prompt": "Estoy intentando validar si `z.currencyCode()` introduce alguna vulnerabilidad de inyección de código. Busca en la lista de CVEs más recientes si hay reportes de seguridad relacionados con la manipulación de listas de códigos ISO 4217 o bibliotecas similares de validación de strings.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3d5d7e1aa5e5d441", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:e1606501b6b6", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39576ad7-1747-4bff-ad29-2771e84fbe75"}}
{"id": "f45f122d89a1f0cd", "prompt": "In `packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx`, where is the migration section for 4.6.x? I need to update the tree-shaking note mentioned in commit 9dc926c.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f45f122d89a1f0cd", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:35bd06229ac3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42085b49-2314-48f5-9421-232166e21eac"}}
{"id": "ec3c19372169ffdf", "prompt": "I'm seeing a performance regression in object parsing. Can you trace the execution path for a simple `z.object({ name: z.string() }).parse()` call? Specifically, which files in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic` handle the actual validation step and error construction? Also, find the benchmark file that compares `compile-validate-vs-parse`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ec3c19372169ffdf", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:d91d5f8d32a8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a2c80ec5-5a8b-4e45-a12d-d02770747eae"}}
{"id": "8b1632df8fbbc266", "prompt": "We need to update the documentation for the new `z.currencyCode` feature. \n\nReference: commit `d6bc1e3`. \n\n1. Read `packages/docs/content/codecs.mdx` and `packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx`.\n2. Add a section to `codecs.mdx` about ISO 4217 currency codes, linking to `scripts/update-iso-4217.ts`.\n3. Update the changelog in `changelog.mdx` to mention this feature in the latest patch notes.\n4. Ensure `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` is mentioned as the source of truth for the locale data used in examples.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8b1632df8fbbc266", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:c3945a1bce5a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cdbf64ac-d5ae-4705-842b-f4eb40a5db8f"}}
{"id": "f822ba949eaf7270", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the locale system. How does `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` define its translation strings, and how are they consumed by the validator?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f822ba949eaf7270", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:c414c8b765e7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1d25bc2-1bcb-4954-a8b8-21e97112c5a9"}}
{"id": "70ad37ce369901b5", "prompt": "Kannst du bitte in der `packages/docs/content/v4/versioning.mdx` nachlesen, was genau sich bei der Typ-Inferenz für `z.object` geändert hat? Ich teste gerade `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/object.test.ts` und bekomme Fehler, weil `z.infer` jetzt strikter ist. Die Migration Guide auf der Website erwähnt das nicht explizit. Was steht im offiziellen Changelog für v4.0.0 bezüglich `z.object` shapes?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "70ad37ce369901b5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:99a3c0461673", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-001", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "83057ed2-1a5e-4404-b79f-969fe121233e"}}
{"id": "d48d335a16230fbd", "prompt": "我们需要对 `packages/zod` 进行一次跨版本的大重构，目标是为 v4 版本做准备。请按以下三个阶段并行开展工作：\n1. **核心逻辑迁移**：将 `packages/zod/src/v4/classic` 中的部分核心校验逻辑（如 `primitive` 和 `string`）提取到 `packages/zod/src/v4/core` 中，确保 `core` 目录成为 v4 的单一事实来源。\n2. **测试覆盖补全**：针对 `packages/zod/src/v4/core` 下新提取的逻辑，在 `packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/` 目录下编写对应的单元测试，特别是要覆盖到之前在 `classic` 测试中遗漏的边界情况。\n3. **性能基准调研**：利用 `packages/bench` 下的工具，对比 v3 现有实现与 v4 `core` 实现版本在 `string` 和 `object` 创建上的内存分配差异，并整理出一份初步的性能报告。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "请先深入分析一下 `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/` 里的测试用例，列出哪些可以无缝迁移到新的 `core/tests` 目录下，哪些需要重写。"}, {"prompt": "针对性能调研部分，请重点关注 schema 实例化时的 overhead，对比一下目前的 `packages/zod/src/v3/benchmarks/` 数据。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d48d335a16230fbd", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "zod:02bcf8535eb5", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "64190771-3d1f-4c67-998a-780afe82ae7c"}}
{"id": "55143b4b8b4cd09a", "prompt": "Dans packages/zod/src/v4/core, je vois un fichier standard-schema.ts. C'est quoi ce Standard Schema exactement ? Est-ce une spécification externe que Zod implémente ou c'est une proposition interne ? Pourquoi c'est dans le core plutôt que dans classic ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Est-ce que toutes les validations utilisent ce format maintenant ?"}, {"prompt": "Y a-t-il une rétrocompatibilité avec la v3 pour ce format ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "55143b4b8b4cd09a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:e17e60b0a732", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5e8bbfe3-ce80-41ef-8e7f-269047796091"}}
{"id": "119946b3590889ea", "prompt": "I noticed the recent commit `d6bc113` added `z.currencyCode()` backed by a vendored ISO 4217 list. The CI script `scripts/update-iso-4217.ts` seems to refresh this weekly. \n\nHow does the `z.currencyCode()` schema behave in `Zod Mini`? Is it available in the mini bundle out of the box, or does it require a specific locale import like `z/locales/en`? I want to make sure I'm not bloat-adding if the consumer doesn't need it.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "119946b3590889ea", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:97baf8ce9767", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d18a6502-8cf9-4e7b-9491-53f379e9fea2"}}
{"id": "86562c9f04401016", "prompt": "The changes I'm making to `packages/zod/src/v3/index.ts` are getting messy. Stash my current work so I can start fresh, but keep the files in my working directory if possible.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "86562c9f04401016", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:e7eefbce24fc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "57c508b4-3174-45ec-840b-46ac3b09aa6c"}}
{"id": "b609e70da3f91ce1", "prompt": "I'm upgrading to v4 and noticed z.currencyCode is now available. Is it automatically updated or do I need to vendor the ISO 4217 list myself?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Where is the ISO 4217 data stored in the repo?"}, {"prompt": "Can I see the commit that added this feature?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b609e70da3f91ce1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:7ab7124c8adf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "13105b12-c113-4f23-a03b-4472b1937bba"}}
{"id": "5e65f8da68a5f88e", "prompt": "Hey, what is the current status of the Zod 4.6.8 npm package? Specifically, I want to know if there are any reported security advisories or CVEs associated with the v4 core schema processing logic mentioned in the recent commit 'Fix bugs and improve performance' (d821685). Can you check the GitHub Security Advisories page and npm audit for the latest version?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, thanks. Is there a known issue where z.object in v4 fails validation on keys that contain prototype properties like __proto__ or constructor when using strict mode?"}, {"prompt": "Right, so the fix is likely in the registries.ts or visit.ts file. Can you check the commit d821685 or the latest branch to see if they implemented a check for `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty` before accessing keys in the core schema processing?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "5e65f8da68a5f88e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:52ea4b14d8ee", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "276e86a1-4865-4f8a-beb2-b17acd42a340"}}
{"id": "b50f84c0650fa4fd", "prompt": "Hi, I'm running into an issue with z.object() in a TypeScript project. When I define an object with a key that has a reserved word in TypeScript (like 'type'), the inferred type seems to lose the strictness on that field.\n\nHere is the schema:\n\n```ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\n\nconst schema = z.object({\n  name: z.string(),\n  \"type\": z.enum([\"A\", \"B\"]),\n});\n\ntype Input = z.input<typeof schema>;\ntype Output = z.output<typeof schema>;\n```\n\nThe output type for `type` is showing as `string` instead of `\"A\" | \"B\"`. I checked the docs and it says string keys should work fine. Is this a known issue in v4 classic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b50f84c0650fa4fd", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:ec7afd45a2fe", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4fd3a7b-06a2-47b6-b140-7037b23e280a"}}
{"id": "96697824add1911d", "prompt": "Preciso de help com o z.coerce.date(). Ele tá falhando silenciosamente quando recebo uma string de data inválida no formato ISO, mas o comportamento esperado seria lançar um ZodError. O parse tá retornando uma data como Epoch se a string não for parseável. Pode ajustar o coerce para ser mais estrito? Segue o link do test case que reproduz: packages/zod/src/v4/mini/tests/recursive-types.test.ts (adaptado para dates).", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "96697824add1911d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:3194526bc791", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-002", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ad293283-5a9e-4a0b-a8b2-c755dac011b8"}}
{"id": "f68ac6c723177160", "prompt": "I'm seeing some performance improvements in recent commits related to schema allocation. Can you check `packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts` and see if there are any specific optimizations for reducing overhead during validation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f68ac6c723177160", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:96b801f34e4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "161900fe-8f77-4dae-bbdf-dae1c8a2cc73"}}
{"id": "cf0be6afd7b85a67", "prompt": "Hi, could you quickly check the live response from https://registry.npmjs.org/zod/latest? I need to verify the exact dependencies listed in the field for the current published version of Zod. I'm seeing a discrepancy between what's in our local `packages/zod/package.json` and what seems to be live. Please grab the JSON body of the response.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "cf0be6afd7b85a67", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:ee173a253b04", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "50445f83-0f46-48cd-b7bc-2a1d45d87aa3"}}
{"id": "117bdf5c3a4903d2", "prompt": "In the README, it says 'Immutable API: methods return a new instance'. Does this apply to z.object({}).extend() as well? I want to make sure I'm not accidentally mutating my base schema.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "117bdf5c3a4903d2", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:54b47d225efa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eb07dbbc-2664-489a-a494-986ba8555abd"}}
{"id": "076838cffd6a1842", "prompt": "Add a unit test for the new `currencyCode` logic in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/`. After that, commit it all.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The test is failing with a type error in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts`. Fix the type error first, then commit the test."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "076838cffd6a1842", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:2208ccff73a9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "17b50cdc-2339-4a71-a6dd-258a6c6f8e46"}}
{"id": "ca8bb69de62eb75d", "prompt": "run the bench/memory/leaks.ts benchmark. I suspect we're leaking closures in the recent z.object() refactor.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ca8bb69de62eb75d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:293acd7b49c9", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80b64ec2-44dc-41fa-b343-57df77b00e27"}}
{"id": "bc182cdf78149ea2", "prompt": "The recursive tuple test in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/recursive-tuples.test.ts` is failing. It seems like the schema definition for a recursive tree structure isn't holding up under the newer core compiler changes.\n\nHere's the error:\n\n```text\nTypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'key')\n    at Object.parseRecursiveTuple (packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts:142:23)\n    at ZodTuple._parse (packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts:892:15)\n```\n\nCan you check the `registries.ts` implementation and fix the recursive tuple parsing logic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc182cdf78149ea2", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:d0c031fd3195", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0f83bbe4-3059-4e37-9114-7d638cbfb937"}}
{"id": "116e83c9158803f5", "prompt": "The CI failed on the v4 core tests. specifically `packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/locales/nl.test.ts` is throwing. can you run just that one test file?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "116e83c9158803f5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:2e70e7217f0c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5b1b6816-fd8b-4e17-8a55-0bac4964e63f"}}
{"id": "9890fb4b7c2cc50c", "prompt": "How does the `visit` function in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts` actually traverse the schema tree? I want to understand if it's recursive or iterative.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "9890fb4b7c2cc50c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:f3c03d37cbf6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-003", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6110bc06-1829-4a47-b1d1-d8e8d1fbd392"}}
{"id": "181dd7f97ba7fd1e", "prompt": "In `packages/docs/app/layout.tsx`, add a new prop to the main layout component called `showBreadcrumbs` that defaults to `false`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "181dd7f97ba7fd1e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:dc4efb8bf9dc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6ab28c5c-2ad9-482a-a71b-ca2288ff38ae"}}
{"id": "eb4c4fd80b9f8b8a", "prompt": "The README mentions 'Built-in JSON Schema conversion'. How do I convert a Zod v4 schema to JSON Schema Draft 2020-12?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "eb4c4fd80b9f8b8a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:2b84b55d2e6a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4877a98-f906-4c27-8cba-5c98d408b111"}}
{"id": "ef84c0729c99a79e", "prompt": "who changed the locale files in packages/zod/src/v4/locales/ recently and what was the motivation?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ef84c0729c99a79e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:b3c062f9f93c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5be488d5-9f33-45f3-9fa9-c352539a9557"}}
{"id": "5a026e4f71c7c8e5", "prompt": "Why does z.infer return a deep clone instead of a reference to the input object in .parse()? I saw in the README it mentions 'strongly-typed, validated result' and 'deep clone'. Does this mean performance implications for large objects?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "5a026e4f71c7c8e5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:15a1938181c1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "443a3737-8132-4a36-9ac7-400ab70b8833"}}
{"id": "f0cb71de311accde", "prompt": "Draft release notes for version 4.6.8. We need to highlight the performance improvements regarding validation and schema allocation overhead, and mention the fix for the .properties() shape in instanceof.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f0cb71de311accde", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "zod:a4fa1e1f285b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6c3f242-d4d8-4803-87ee-79b0001e6bc3"}}
{"id": "8a1165b983eb97b7", "prompt": "Where is the locale for 'nl' (Dutch) defined? I want to see the error messages. Check `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8a1165b983eb97b7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:3afba81873cd", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd5c1848-86f2-41a3-9cc6-4913c222727a"}}
{"id": "c98b9f1eb5ccb34b", "prompt": "Limpa os artefatos de build. Roda `pnpm clean` ou remove as pastas `dist/`, `.vinxi/` e `node_modules/.cache/` manualmente se o script não existir. Quer deixar o repo limpo.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Lista o que foi deletado."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c98b9f1eb5ccb34b", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:9601fe52e781", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "58fd706b-692f-4ea0-a783-1622f3fcdba8"}}
{"id": "e18d8f46df6f8166", "prompt": "We need to standardize how locale files are imported across the codebase to improve tree-shaking. Currently, importing `z.coerce` or `z.object` inadvertently pulls in locale data if not careful.\n\nPlease scan through:\n- `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/index.ts`\n- `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts`\n- `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/index.ts`\n\nAnd update any internal imports of locale definitions to point directly to `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` (or the specific locale being used) rather than the loose re-exports from `packages/zod/src/locales/index.ts`.\n\nBasically, replace:\n`import { en } from \"../../../locales\"`\nwith:\n`import { en } from \"../../../locales/en\"`\n\nDo this mechanically wherever `locales/index` is referenced in the v4 source tree. Don't touch v3.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e18d8f46df6f8166", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:b87292c2659a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-004", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d0556af-81f6-4a79-92b5-4e68f79d01ac"}}
{"id": "6e5752be1f99aa92", "prompt": "Tweak the error message in `packages/zod/src/v3/errors.ts` to be more descriptive when a validation fails due to a type mismatch. Keep it concise.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "6e5752be1f99aa92", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:a4a7bfeb2e67", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "216bd685-432d-4818-bcd1-e99b23fd9a2a"}}
{"id": "3f9654c8e7cc4f5d", "prompt": "The CI is failing on the `zod/src/v4/core/tests/locales/parity.test.ts` suite. It looks like the Dutch locale (`nl.ts`) is missing a translation key compared to the English one. Can you run that specific test file and show me the diff? I need to know exactly which keys are missing.\n\nfollow_ups:\n[\"Show me the content of packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts for the missing keys.\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Show me the content of packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts for the missing keys."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3f9654c8e7cc4f5d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:da65bd52db32", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23cd1bc3-223d-468b-94d5-41a53d5e4d01"}}
{"id": "690849718614471e", "prompt": "I'm looking at `packages/docs/content/codecs.mdx` and `packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx`. The docs mention that Zod now has a built-in `z.currencyCode()` and that `z.locales` is tree-shakeable.\n\nCan you go to the official Zod docs (https://zod.dev) and check the migration guide or v4 changelog for the exact recommended import path for locale files? The recent commit `e7b0f14` says \"docs: import locales from zod/locales, not z.locales\", but I want to make sure I'm not missing any breaking changes or specific setup instructions for the `en` locale in `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "690849718614471e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:c264d36d4af3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "134ef786-2dd5-49ae-b517-67e48401a3e9"}}
{"id": "26e2fa81e7f5f151", "prompt": "The last commit `12e6272` introduced a regression in the performance of object schemas. Can you revert that commit?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "26e2fa81e7f5f151", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:f3ab66288e5a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a9b676df-5755-4e62-915a-3758e17a9bce"}}
{"id": "67756b9c94c548d1", "prompt": "I need to add a new locale. Look at `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` and tell me the structure. Then find the parity test that ensures all locales match the English messages.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "67756b9c94c548d1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:c2400267ac00", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f38a82f2-3f2c-4288-84ca-6100dd6f424b"}}
{"id": "2fc1b930d399cb6b", "prompt": "The `z.coerce.string()` transform is silently failing for me in Zod Mini. I'm using the mini build because I need to minimize bundle size.\n\nI have a field that might be undefined:\n\n```ts\nconst schema = z.object({\n  date: z.coerce.date(),\n});\n\n// Input\nconst input = { date: \"2023-01-01\" };\nschema.parse(input); // OK\n\nconst input2 = { date: undefined };\nschema.parse(input2); // Should throw, but doesn't?\n```\n\nIf I use `z.string().transform((val) => new Date(val))` it throws a validation error as expected. But `z.coerce.date()` just passes `undefined` through or crashes inside the Date constructor? No, it returns a Date of \"Invalid Date\". I want it to fail validation if the value is missing.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2fc1b930d399cb6b", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:06397e5cc137", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "426a876a-5dc7-4d4f-9029-7db509acabdb"}}
{"id": "ffdec071fc835542", "prompt": "Split my uncommitted changes into two logical commits: one for the fixes in `packages/zod/src/v3/errors.ts` and one for the updates to `packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts`. Use proper commit messages for each.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ffdec071fc835542", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:778a4a68912d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c2c7300c-580a-4143-a8fd-7f36aae7bbde"}}
{"id": "7bc5a0e026100ba1", "prompt": "Can you add a quick test case to `packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/email-regex.test.ts` to check for edge cases with subdomains? Once that's done, create a new branch called `feat/email-regex-tests` and commit the change.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Now commit my changes with a descriptive message following the conventional commits format."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7bc5a0e026100ba1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:3eeb118ae46a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-005", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6444f591-f690-4ca0-926f-ff387b10c4fe"}}
{"id": "1410442f775282b9", "prompt": "I'm refactoring the locale handling in packages/zod/src/v4/locales. Can you find where the English locale (`en`) is actually instantiated and exported from the main index file for v4? I need to make sure I'm not duplicating the load logic.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, got it. Now show me the test file that exercises that specific locale loading path."}, {"prompt": "Actually, while you're at it, does `packages/zod/src/mini/index.ts` import from the same place or does it have its own implementation?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1410442f775282b9", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:6bde19f9b3b3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "075f7f7d-d75b-451d-b261-2be50df3b351"}}
{"id": "4a76ad32afe13336", "prompt": "Explain the implementation of `packages/zod/src/v4/core/json-schema-processors.ts`. How does it map Zod types to JSON Schema types?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4a76ad32afe13336", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:1e90c9177908", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "40500e79-72be-405b-8531-030afb441022"}}
{"id": "3662a984bddba259", "prompt": "I'm looking for the error message definition for 'invalid_date'. Can't find it in the standard v4 classic tests. Is it localized?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3662a984bddba259", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:b5f9d61c44d2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2727a894-1fcf-42c1-a3dd-48a8a54ea56f"}}
{"id": "1a34ff635d489793", "prompt": "Can you check if we are using any outdated or insecure versions of dependencies in our `packages/docs` sub-package? I'm worried about the build security.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1a34ff635d489793", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "zod:b4247290dd32", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9ec7fee1-6e95-4d66-9464-fd7f3bf867d4"}}
{"id": "727677550b850b10", "prompt": "Can you explain the purpose of `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts`? Is this intended for a subset of Zod features?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "727677550b850b10", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:77b85b83435e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53fcd6a0-91b6-4453-adec-d1bc2000b95d"}}
{"id": "858dfa663ea41424", "prompt": "We need to prepare for the next major release. Can you handle the following across the repository:\n1. Audit `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/` to ensure all new locales added recently are correctly exported in `packages/zod/src/locales/index.ts`.\n2. Check `packages/docs/content/packages/zod.mdx` and update any outdated version references or feature descriptions to match the current v4 status.\n3. Run the benchmarks in `packages/bench/` to see if the recent perf optimizations in `ad32d75` actually improved `object-creation.ts` and `string.ts` compared to the previous baseline.\n\nLet me know what you find.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The locale exports look correct, but the docs still mention v3 features as if they are current. Should I draft a PR for the mdx updates?"}, {"prompt": "Benchmarks show a 5% improvement in string validation but object creation is actually slower. I'll look into `packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts` to see if object allocation increased."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "858dfa663ea41424", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "multi_part", "prompt_group": "zod:d698acbdf828", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "995e2625-8949-4772-a6bb-c442a3327280"}}
{"id": "db70b2c9a818b9b7", "prompt": "Looking at `packages/docs/content/library-authors.mdx`, I see a section about integration. I want to ensure my library works with both Zod v3 and v4. Can you check the Zod blog post on \"Reducing Memory Footprint\" (`packages/docs/content/blog/reducing-memory-footprint.mdx`) and see if they mention any breaking changes in the public API that library authors should be aware of? Specifically, look at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/index.ts` to see if `z.AnyZodObject` is still exposed in the same way.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, thanks. Based on that, can you update `packages/docs/content/library-authors.mdx` to include a warning about the removal or restructuring of `z.AnyZodObject` in v4?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "db70b2c9a818b9b7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:f4131e184092", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "08bbf0c8-5d48-40de-9da7-e2c01f13d59b"}}
{"id": "3ec024a4278b0b8e", "prompt": "帮我盯着一下 packages/docs/ 目录，等里面的构建流程完成或者出现报错时立刻通知我。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3ec024a4278b0b8e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:713c85875a41", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-006", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2437c8e6-29c2-4760-a53f-ee2b60aa877e"}}
{"id": "beb03f185760c993", "prompt": "How does the schema validation logic change when moving from the classic implementation to the core implementation in `packages/zod/src/v4/`? Specifically, look at how `packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts` handles tree traversal.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the new core implementation impact how `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` behaves during a `.parse()` call?"}, {"prompt": "Show me any performance differences mentioned in the recent commits regarding schema allocation overhead."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "beb03f185760c993", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:6719f380da4e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6a15d30-115c-49fb-9a7e-81e6137ac7ca"}}
{"id": "298ef570342ff491", "prompt": "Delete the `packages/docs-v3` directory. It's deprecated and we are only using `packages/docs` now.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "298ef570342ff491", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:05ae0859eb1a", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fa6bafcc-3f3a-4e3d-ac79-1b48b46fc11b"}}
{"id": "bc81947ace385958", "prompt": "check git blame on packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts for the lines involving schema definition.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bc81947ace385958", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:830363308e5d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8bb187c0-b9f8-42dc-91eb-785a55d3ac01"}}
{"id": "aca1b4ccf0b63fc7", "prompt": "我收到了一个 bug 报告，说在 `packages/zod/src/v4/mini` 中，某些特殊的 Unicode 字符会导致 `z.string().email()` 崩溃。这看起来像是个潜在的 DoS 向量。请审查 `locales` 目录下对应的处理逻辑，看看是不是有没处理的异常路径。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "aca1b4ccf0b63fc7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:7e9f011681c4", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "20d0a6b7-6447-40ab-8aee-4c69f479b1ac"}}
{"id": "4c90c767d6df8cf9", "prompt": "I see a lot of locale files like packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts. How do I configure Zod to use a specific locale for error messages globally?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "4c90c767d6df8cf9", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:56c38019085f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "659699d6-f41a-4677-bd54-520ca825d598"}}
{"id": "6afbf895f1141e5c", "prompt": "I accidentally left a console.log in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts`. Can you remove it and then amend my last commit so the log doesn't show up in the history?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6afbf895f1141e5c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:24fcb96317d6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "0f87ba7e-7d3b-4196-95d0-8895d9a223c0"}}
{"id": "3fe1f2201daaecb7", "prompt": "Ich suche gerade nach der offiziellen Dokumentation für `z.union` in v4. In `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/union.test.ts` sehe ich einige Edge Cases mit `z.discriminatedUnion`. Kannst du auf zod.dev nachschauen, wie discriminated unions in v4 implementiert sind im Vergleich zu v3? Ich habe das Gefühl, dass die `discriminator`-Option in den Tests hier (`packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/discriminated-unions.test.ts`) anders funktioniert als im v3-Code. Was sagt die Docs-Seite \"Discriminated Unions\" in der v4-Dokumentation dazu?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3fe1f2201daaecb7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:8d332d190e10", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f86413a1-fad9-4eb4-aac0-c0f39e2a775e"}}
{"id": "795a79d8062956e0", "prompt": "Explain the changes made in commit 56222cd regarding instanceof.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "795a79d8062956e0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:fe5bb8f2eebf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-007", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "af995ae6-307c-4571-9923-5c0710bae9c2"}}
{"id": "debc54f241a0382d", "prompt": "Can you refactor the benchmark setup in `packages/bench/object-setup.ts`? It's currently creating new schemas on every iteration which skews the results. Move the schema definitions outside the loop.\n\nAlso, do the same for `packages/bench/error-construction-breakdown.ts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "debc54f241a0382d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:eee85b517e44", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "61c59729-d681-48d9-bd57-514e19762408"}}
{"id": "029cea6f589b434f", "prompt": "Bug report: O z.preprocess() não tá preservando o contexto de 'this' quando usado dentro de z.object(). Quando eu defino uma função dentro do preprocess acessando 'this' de um método de classe, ela tá undefined. Isso tá ocorrendo na branch principal. Pode dar uma olhada em packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/preprocess.test.ts?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Isso é crítico porque meu esquema depende de estado local da classe."}, {"prompt": "Se possível, me avise se é workaround fácil ou se precisa de patch no core."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "029cea6f589b434f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:386f6158c76d", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1741ab0-7ec3-4b6f-8bb5-d5d030b0080d"}}
{"id": "89a473796d9f6914", "prompt": "Hey, quick question. I see packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts. I'm trying to figure out if the locale files are tree-shakable by default according to the docs. The recent commit message says 'docs: tighten the z.locales tree-shaking note'. What does the official docs say about importing locales to ensure minimal bundle size?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Do I need to change how we import locales in packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts to match that recommendation?"}, {"prompt": "Check if there's a specific import path recommended for the mini package."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "89a473796d9f6914", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:e5f23becc52f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc2bcdf9-b663-46c2-bf04-86df354bb220"}}
{"id": "7635f521d936ce35", "prompt": "Looking at packages/zod/src/v4/core/json-schema-processors.ts. I need to know how Zod v4 handles JSON Schema draft versions. Does the official docs specify if the built-in JSON Schema conversion uses draft-2020-12 or something else? I'm trying to interop with a legacy system.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7635f521d936ce35", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:4e52f1af5214", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6bce4bb-6d6d-4a6f-be8f-a5aab54c3048"}}
{"id": "2da1ae19f6eb0a42", "prompt": "Hey, quick question about the `z.object().parse()` behavior mentioned in `packages/docs-v3/README_KO.md` and `packages/docs-v3/README_ZH.md`.\n\nThe docs say Zod returns a 'strongly-typed, validated result' and mentions it's a 'deep clone'. I'm seeing some weird performance issues in `packages/bench/object-creation.ts`.\n\nCould you look up the section on 'Parsing Data' in the official Zod docs to confirm if the deep clone is always happening or if there's a flag to disable it? Also, check the `packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts` file to see if the new v4 core uses a different mechanism than v3.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2da1ae19f6eb0a42", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:6b50538553a5", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bbbffafd-7b5e-4cef-b198-5e6f116bd0c5"}}
{"id": "da7b683bfe054bcb", "prompt": "I'm refactoring the v4 class schemas to enforce stricter typing on the constructor arguments. \n\nRight now, `z.class` allows arbitrary properties in the shape, but we need to ensure that the required properties align strictly with the class `constructor` parameters.\n\nLook at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` and the corresponding tests in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/instanceof.test.ts`.\n\nCan you update the `z.class` implementation to:\n1. Infer the constructor parameter types from the provided class.\n2. Enforce that the `z.object` shape passed to `z.class` matches those constructor parameters exactly (keys and types).\n\nMake sure this doesn't break the existing `instanceof` tests.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The type inference seems to be losing the generic context inside the class helper. Can you fix the type signature for `ZodClass` so the shape inference propagates correctly to the output type?"}, {"prompt": "Now that the types are stricter, some of the examples in the docs-v3 for 'class validation' are failing to compile. Should we update the examples or allow an override for non-constructor properties?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "da7b683bfe054bcb", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:d35d1601e426", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8030209c-32dd-4ae7-af59-5a003b064180"}}
{"id": "a41dfe57d4fea4c3", "prompt": "Je me suis emmêlé les pinceaux dans mes derniers changements sur `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts`. Peux-tu annuler le dernier commit et remettre ces fichiers dans mon espace de travail pour que je puisse recommencer ?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Parfait. Maintenant, regarde ce que j'ai fait, sépare mes modifications en deux commits logiques (un pour la logique et un pour les tests) et crée une branche `fix/schema-logic` pour tout ça."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a41dfe57d4fea4c3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:aaeab56bf210", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2f418ffe-79bf-47dc-a646-90d53257400d"}}
{"id": "af03e963b0155d47", "prompt": "Fix the types in `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/index.ts`. The export for `z.lazy` is not matching the signature in the core module. TypeScript is complaining that the return type is not assignable. Check `packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts` to see the expected signature.\n\nfollow_ups\": [\n\"Run the type checks for the mini package.\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "af03e963b0155d47", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:ca992640bd9f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-008", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2d38502e-8f87-4919-a0c5-72557506be08"}}
{"id": "7300db722e6978d6", "prompt": "Help me optimize the tree-shaking analysis. I have `packages/treeshake/example.ts` and `packages/treeshake/zod-mini-boolean.ts`. \n\nI want to verify that importing from `zod/mini` doesn't pull in the full `classic` engine. Run `esbuild` on both files with `--bundle --minify --outfile=/dev/null` and compare the output sizes. \n\nAlso check `packages/treeshake/bundle-size.test.ts` to see if we have automated checks for this already.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7300db722e6978d6", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:64d55985b347", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e4448468-8bc1-40bd-904f-2a2d2832d353"}}
{"id": "af990efcdf23532f", "prompt": "Oi, to com um erro chato no Zod v4 classic. Quando eu uso z.object() e passo um objeto com chaves que não estão definidas no schema, o parse não lança erro de 'unrecognized keys' como deveria. Parece que ele está ignorando as chaves extras e apenas retornando o objeto. Pode dar uma olhada no packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/object.test.ts e verificar se o comportamento do stripUnknown ou similar está quebrado?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "af990efcdf23532f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:2b6046521ab3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9f2615c3-6271-48b2-80e4-bac46ad106e2"}}
{"id": "a2e8b102cd75d74d", "prompt": "Where is the error message string 'Expected string, received number' defined? I'm debugging a localization issue in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts` but I can't trace the message back to its source.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a2e8b102cd75d74d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:0e79ed6fea61", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d57180ca-0153-49c1-95da-e42eb3939423"}}
{"id": "e0108cfe97f4d3ca", "prompt": "Hey, looking at `packages/docs/content/codecs.mdx` and `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/index.ts`. I'm trying to understand the `z.coerce` implementation details for v4 versus v3. The docs on zod.dev aren't super clear on whether `z.coerce.string()` in v4 behaves exactly like the v3 implementation or if there are edge cases with the underlying `z.mini` module. Can you check the official Zod docs (zod.dev/api) regarding coercion in v4 and compare it to the source code in `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts`? Specifically, does v4 support asymmetric coercion (number to string) out of the box like v3, or do I need to define it manually?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e0108cfe97f4d3ca", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:480eed30fff6", "lang": "de", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "39121a9c-707e-4691-a77d-1bb6237d398b"}}
{"id": "40c1f584ea839ab0", "prompt": "Start the docs dev server.\n\nfollow_ups\": [\n\"Does the build complete without errors in the console?\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "40c1f584ea839ab0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:7a84b3a3d111", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02937f7b-f296-4ecd-b42e-6b8e07b89863"}}
{"id": "3f7e80e35cc8ba63", "prompt": "Show me all files that import or extend `ZodObject` from `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts`. I need to understand the footprint of changes I'm about to make to the object shape logic.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there any mini implementations of object parsing I should be aware of?"}, {"prompt": "Check if the docs page for objects references any of these internal functions."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3f7e80e35cc8ba63", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:e5af9afb40aa", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7d95daa1-95de-45f6-b039-d148d1270dad"}}
{"id": "246ec6efde4d5980", "prompt": "Where is the ISO 4217 currency code list defined? I saw a commit adding `z.currencyCode()` and I need to find the source data for it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is this list vendored in the repo or fetched at build time?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the script that updates this data."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "246ec6efde4d5980", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:04efd76fe6e4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4d275545-6808-4d4c-9df5-9415e3f2be9e"}}
{"id": "b64e569140fe3f82", "prompt": "Add a new section to packages/docs/content/ecosystem.mdx describing how Zod integrates with standard schema tools, specifically mentioning the built-in JSON Schema conversion.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b64e569140fe3f82", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "zod:1699cec20374", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-009", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "beb2c6e2-188a-4504-a412-c6c12e5b1c03"}}
{"id": "07e67b6b5c721062", "prompt": "Refactor `packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts` to use a more efficient type check for the internal registry. Once that's done, create a new branch called `refactor/registry-util` and commit the changes with a descriptive message.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "07e67b6b5c721062", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:12f74ef41cf6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f05c80ab-d788-4bf4-8fcd-11bd7b3b157e"}}
{"id": "800402bd6b517e4a", "prompt": "Find all TODO comments in packages/zod/src/v4. List them out here.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "800402bd6b517e4a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:8fe52a22db6e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e6e87db-21ab-4880-9824-c7629ffcd3c6"}}
{"id": "42390b4e088a967a", "prompt": "Olá, preciso de uma revisão rápida no `packages/zod/package.json`. Poderia verificar se a versão atual está correta e se os campos 'main', 'module', 'exports' e 'types' estão apontando para os arquivos corretos da versão v4? Estou vendo algumas inconsistências nos caminhos de exportação e quero garantir que o tree-shaking funcione conforme esperado para os pacotes 'zod/mini' e 'zod/locales'. Se houver erros, por favor, corrija.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "42390b4e088a967a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:9f7c6921903d", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "42aa0986-9d96-4135-a951-e3d28a198af4"}}
{"id": "b8840ed1377d78ef", "prompt": "我在 `packages/docs/pages/api/_og.tsx` 里加了个新的 OG 图片生成接口。帮我 review 一下这段代码，确保没有 SSRF 漏洞，因为用户能传 url 进去。另外检查一下有没有硬编码的 secret 或 API key。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b8840ed1377d78ef", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:022ff2cc9c5a", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e66160d-99dc-46ea-8b64-5d8a7c758de3"}}
{"id": "c9412c5f2b87e727", "prompt": "Update `packages/docs/components/featured.tsx` to include a new prop called `isNew` that renders a small 'NEW' badge next to the title.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c9412c5f2b87e727", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:88410ce3479e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ac111b48-bd29-4196-bf61-9ccc76465b88"}}
{"id": "ae51d53913f169de", "prompt": "帮我启动开发服务器，然后等它完全启动并显示 'Ready' 之后再告诉我。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ae51d53913f169de", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:567dd3b6dc8e", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "23e48df0-05cc-4947-98cf-992d39144ba0"}}
{"id": "f68b457649a6d375", "prompt": "check out the commit d2b135c and verify that the v4 changelog content in packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx actually matches the code changes in packages/zod/src/v4. I see a discrepancy in the error formatting section.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f68b457649a6d375", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:c072ebe3d475", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7c7e1336-c508-4d50-966b-3a8d72d49795"}}
{"id": "3bcec28cf0dd1ab6", "prompt": "Find the implementation of the `z.coerce` utilities in Zod Mini. Look in `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts`. I want to understand how it handles `undefined` vs `null`.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Are there tests for coerce in the mini package?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/index.ts` to see what's exported."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "3bcec28cf0dd1ab6", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:5cfe3435a9f7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-010", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8449f801-0a19-4ed1-b137-42ff6dfd1055"}}
{"id": "1a04d6fc6af0ab62", "prompt": "Alguém mais tá com esse issue de tipos inferidos errados no z.union()? Segue o código e o erro:\n\n```ts\nimport { z } from 'zod';\n\nconst A = z.object({ type: z.literal('A'), val: z.string() });\nconst B = z.object({ type: z.literal('B'), count: z.number() });\nconst Union = z.union([A, B]);\n\ntype Result = z.infer<typeof Union>;\n// Result está vindo como never em vez do objeto correto.\n```\n\nStack trace do tsc:\n```\nerror TS2345: Argument of type 'never' is not assignable to parameter of type...\n```\n\nIsso tá acontecendo no packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/union.test.ts.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Já tentei usar z.discriminatedUnion mas o erro persiste."}, {"prompt": "Isso começou depois que atualizei para a versão 4.6.x."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1a04d6fc6af0ab62", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:72416e346e0e", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1bb7482a-37d5-4781-a840-3040ecb6530d"}}
{"id": "a59cc76d96a14634", "prompt": "Peux-tu modifier `packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts` pour ajouter un commentaire explicatif sur la fonction d'aide utilisée pour la récursion ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a59cc76d96a14634", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:facac97f5bc5", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "26d508a3-ee55-4943-92e6-8aa43b1744af"}}
{"id": "2eedde3939a30c28", "prompt": "hey, I'm seeing some weird memory spikes in the mini benchmarks. can you run the throughput benchmark in packages/bench/memory/throughput.ts? i want to see the output.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you also run the breakdown benchmark? I want to compare the two."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2eedde3939a30c28", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:a5c23fbba265", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "5cb4f3ae-a937-4a52-ac34-ae9e1edfa212"}}
{"id": "a73c791fd2b2cc2f", "prompt": "Run git blame on packages/zod/src/v3/index.ts to see who owns the core implementation.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a73c791fd2b2cc2f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:8722aa54b322", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c5801e91-74f6-4bda-88cb-e70c0eb9a806"}}
{"id": "9e5ad1ab2ae7b474", "prompt": "Can you check the Zod API docs for the v4 `z.instanceof` implementation? I see a test in packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/instanceof.test.ts and a recent commit #6600 about keying properties off the instance type. What is the current documented behavior for `z.instanceof` regarding property inference in v4 compared to v3?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Does the v4 docs mention any performance implications for this property inference?"}, {"prompt": "How should I structure my types in test files to maximize this inference?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9e5ad1ab2ae7b474", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:292ba6e30597", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ebfc4c76-3504-488c-93c2-c49a81ce93d6"}}
{"id": "ebe3fcdb083c0b06", "prompt": "请对 packages/zod/src/v4/core 目录下的代码进行一次安全审查。重点关注 input 校验部分，看看是否能防御 prototype pollution 或者 unsafe eval 相关的攻击。特别是 look at `visit.ts` 和 `registries.ts` 里对动态键的处理。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "基于刚才的分析，给出一个修复 prototype pollution 风险的具体 PR 草稿，只改 affected 的文件。"}, {"prompt": "把这个修复应用到 v3 的兼容层 `packages/zod/src/v3/index.ts` 里，确保没有 breaking change。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ebe3fcdb083c0b06", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:6f7c0825888c", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3d14a82f-e0d3-41ac-81a4-dbb01cc00f13"}}
{"id": "8c4d68213a2f043d", "prompt": "Olha o `.gitignore` atual. Ve se falta adicionar algo como `*.tsbuildinfo`, `.next/` ou `node_modules/.cache`. Se tiver, adiciona.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8c4d68213a2f043d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:12d29a61c91c", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cea4238e-311b-47bb-84c4-1a27a5f4bf24"}}
{"id": "58d534f387e1bed6", "prompt": "Can you check the live response headers for the RSS feed route at `https://zod.dev/blog/rss.xml`? I need to verify if the Content-Type is correctly set to `application/rss+xml` or `text/xml` for my feed validator. Also, please screenshot the actual RSS content to ensure it's not returning 404.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "58d534f387e1bed6", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:7110ebad0922", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-011", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fd674c3c-be4c-4cd8-99fc-00e4967fa418"}}
{"id": "40926c8c068e055a", "prompt": "hey, can we do a quick cleanup pass? please run the linter (biome check --fix) on the packages/zod directory and fix any autofixable issues. then run the typecheck script to make sure nothing broke. I noticed a stray console.log in packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts, can you remove it? also, please update the version in package.json to 4.6.9.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, now run the unit tests for the v4 classic schemas to make sure the version bump didn't break anything."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "40926c8c068e055a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:38a47077e24b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "96f3a48d-cb07-46f5-bbc5-daf3297393ce"}}
{"id": "a34c308a6de6db73", "prompt": "I'm reviewing packages/bench/compile-wrapper-cost.ts. The docs mention 'compile-off-by-default' in packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/compile-off-by-default.test.ts. What is the exact recommendation in the official docs for enabling JIT compilation in production environments? Is there a specific global config vs. per-schema setting?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What is the performance penalty if I leave it disabled in production according to the benchmarks?"}, {"prompt": "How do I enable it globally in the v4 API?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a34c308a6de6db73", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:dc1aa2f55c4d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9380416c-0934-4206-9fd5-cafa1fe196aa"}}
{"id": "081180f91bd4d2e3", "prompt": "Where is the logic for `z.intersection` handled in the new v4 core? I'm comparing it to the v3 implementation in `packages/zod/src/v3/index.ts`. I suspect the v4 version is in `packages/zod/src/v4/core` somewhere.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "081180f91bd4d2e3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:efd8253dd06b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f7df8dd7-6ab1-493d-bdfe-adf72aeea1bb"}}
{"id": "d72badb04cd8aad8", "prompt": "I just realized I made a mistake in the last commit regarding the locale imports. Can you amend the last commit to include the fix I just made in `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d72badb04cd8aad8", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:16c8ec8290c7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3b323910-9a6f-4ba8-9701-5a37cd1435af"}}
{"id": "875db919a0d5fdc0", "prompt": "I need to understand the new locale loading mechanism. Compare how `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` is structured versus how it's being consumed in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts`.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "875db919a0d5fdc0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:6cc162c30ee6", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "947a274f-9074-4a3c-bfc3-f8f698da0a12"}}
{"id": "e345ef351d7886c3", "prompt": "find where z.currencyCode is defined. I see a commit \"feat: add z.currencyCode() over a vendored ISO 4217 list\" but I can't find the actual implementation file in packages/zod/src/v4.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "e345ef351d7886c3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:91a9d437f2de", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "248e2e75-7c89-49d9-a7ee-2a5e05cc04f6"}}
{"id": "2edee349f18145e3", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/stringbool.test.ts` that specifically checks how it handles empty strings when using a custom refinement.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2edee349f18145e3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:f0785ca6dba1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a4179c6-96b5-45d6-b9f7-59d5491b8434"}}
{"id": "f905a724c837c5ad", "prompt": "Oye, ¿puedes mirar el registro de cambios de NPM para `zod` en tiempo real? Quiero ver si la última versión publicada (parece ser la 4.6.8) tiene alguna nota de 'breaking changes' que no esté en el README. Necesito saber si debo actualizar mis tests de `packages/bench` inmediatamente.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Si ves algún aviso importante, revisa el archivo `packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx` para ver si ya está documentado."}, {"prompt": "Si no está documentado, dime qué versión es la más reciente y si hay un commit reciente que indique correcciones de bugs."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f905a724c837c5ad", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:f631437cc323", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-012", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e677c119-69cb-458f-882c-92667e6a2354"}}
{"id": "742a642e409c4344", "prompt": "Hey, in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/object.test.ts`, can you rewrite the object tests to be slightly more DRY? There are a lot of repetitive `z.object({ ... })` definitions.\n\nAlso, check `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/union.test.ts` and see if we can apply a similar helper pattern there for defining test fixtures.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "742a642e409c4344", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:052b7df1a880", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d1f34d00-7c5c-42a6-b507-8028ecb2c38f"}}
{"id": "0f3bd95cdcfe5da2", "prompt": "triage 一下最近 CI 跑出来的 SonarQube 报告。重点关注 `packages/zod/src/v4/classic` 里的 Medium 和 High 级别的安全漏洞。特别是 `unions.test.ts` 和 `object.test.ts` 里的边界情况，有没有可能通过构造畸形输入导致拒绝服务 (DoS)。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "针对那个正则回溯 (ReDoS) 风险，帮我写个测试用例复现它。"}, {"prompt": "修复这个 ReDoS 问题，优化一下正则表达式。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "0f3bd95cdcfe5da2", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:88c2f10bef53", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d6a03b2a-ea3f-43bd-8d7d-586b6081767b"}}
{"id": "a324228bd6499762", "prompt": "I'm trying to understand the v4 registry structure. Please read `packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts` and `packages/zod/src/v4/core/index.ts`. \n\nCan you summarize the key exports and explain how the `registries` module interacts with the core validation logic? I specifically want to know if custom registries can override global configs.\n\nAlso, look at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/index.ts` to see how it integrates with this.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a324228bd6499762", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:b4cdfbd8a23d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6e31bbf4-e90b-4843-981b-eb7d6b407b68"}}
{"id": "769507b0dbc56c4f", "prompt": "I'm trying to debug why the build artifacts are taking so long to publish. Can you clean out the dist folders in packages/zod and packages/mini? Then run a clean build. I also need you to check if there are any TODO comments in packages/zod/src/v4/core that look like they were supposed to be fixed in the last release cycle. Specifically look for TODOs added in the last 3 commits.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "769507b0dbc56c4f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:a58d42a88a7e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e51a3d47-d4db-461a-a154-e39b10801362"}}
{"id": "b6c097107e0eaad3", "prompt": "In the v4 core implementation, how does the `standard-schema` module interact with the `registries.ts` to handle compatibility? I'm seeing that `standardSchema` is defined in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts` and used in `registries.ts`. Could you explain the mechanism for how custom validators are registered or detected in the v4 core vs v3 classic?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "b6c097107e0eaad3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:741d01b73779", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "4da77efd-a6b3-4797-847c-99d24772b25d"}}
{"id": "7ea4d464a0ff88e3", "prompt": "How does the `z.currencyCode()` implementation actually work? I saw a commit about it being refreshed weekly by CI, but I want to see how the vendored ISO 4217 list is being used in the code.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the specific file where the ISO 4217 list is stored?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7ea4d464a0ff88e3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:a8c9d6fff6d0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "501edaba-a568-42a2-a60c-7fa7176c9ddb"}}
{"id": "527b39e15c271d92", "prompt": "Where is the `currencyCode` validation logic implemented in Zod v4? I want to see the regex or source list. Also, point me to the script that refreshes this list weekly via CI.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is the ISO 4217 list vendored in the repo or fetched at build time?"}, {"prompt": "Show me the commit where `z.currencyCode()` was originally added."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "527b39e15c271d92", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:9a313bd78e5b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3320a9fa-3e5e-4034-9beb-f014b5fd3e28"}}
{"id": "8bd4447b365c602f", "prompt": "fix the typescript errors in `packages/resolution/src/index.ts`\n\nThe new `ZodType` generics in v4 are breaking the resolution logic. I'm seeing errors like:\n\n```text\npackages/resolution/src/index.ts:15:5 - error TS2345: Argument of type 'ZodType<any, ZodTypeAny, any>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'ZodType<...>'.\n```\n\nIt seems like the variance on `ZodType` changed in the core module. Please align `packages/resolution/src/index.ts` with the latest `packages/zod/src/v4/core/registries.ts` definitions.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8bd4447b365c602f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:5154d7a932ff", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-013", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2259d4c8-562b-4bff-ac62-ea683112c2cd"}}
{"id": "47414d79173124b1", "prompt": "The `compile-validate-vs-parse.ts` benchmark is weirdly slow compared to `compile-helper-scope.ts`. Can you check if we are accidentally recompiling the schema inside the loop in `compile-validate-vs-parse.ts`? Look at `packages/bench/compile-validate-vs-parse.ts`.\n\nfollow_ups\": [\n\"Optimize the loop if we are indeed recompiling.\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "47414d79173124b1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:d49a70cb40a7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3f9e7d6-deb9-4d28-a881-1bee3d5f29b7"}}
{"id": "f8bff5f4e0f05df7", "prompt": "Fix the type definition for `z.object` in `packages/zod/src/v3/index.ts`. \n \nI noticed that when using `z.object({})` with an empty shape, the return type is sometimes inferred as `any` instead of `ZodObject<{}>` in strict mode. \n\nCheck `packages/zod/src/v3/tests/object-in-es5-env.test.ts` to see if this is an existing issue or a regression. \n\nAlso, look at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` to see how v4 handles this case differently. If v4 does it right, port that logic to v3.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Run the test suite: `pnpm test -- packages/zod/src/v3/tests/object-in-es5-env.test.ts`."}, {"prompt": "Check `packages/tsc/tsconfig.json` to ensure our strict mode settings match the test environment."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "f8bff5f4e0f05df7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:dc73871976bb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "233b9def-1cac-47ad-875c-68a4bd18c95c"}}
{"id": "a560b2552460b991", "prompt": "Which test file covers the `z.object().extend()` behavior? I saw `packages/zod/src/v3/tests/complex.test.ts` but I want the primary test suite for object extension in v4.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Is there a specific assertion for deep cloning in those tests?"}, {"prompt": "Can you check if `packages/bench/compile-overwrite.ts` also uses this pattern?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a560b2552460b991", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:3cf932fbb1dc", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3bff8932-2e38-4a31-a896-0925f3470ca5"}}
{"id": "08aa1ddfab202fdc", "prompt": "packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts の `visit` 関数の引数に、オプションで `depthLimit` を渡せるように変更したい。型定義も更新して。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "変更した関数が既存のテストを壊していないか、packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/index.test.ts を実行して確認して。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "08aa1ddfab202fdc", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:76a2d24f8f51", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dd94b7e2-57d5-4ba7-9ea6-c7089b06b594"}}
{"id": "e9a94a1fca38b876", "prompt": "packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts に新しいユーティリティ関数を追加して、型安全に文字列をトリムする機能を作りたいです。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "その関数を使って、packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/stringbool.test.ts にテストケースを追加して。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e9a94a1fca38b876", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:7711636403fa", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "8a7925fc-bd96-43f8-83b8-ea6ae6017e21"}}
{"id": "6796b45390e41371", "prompt": "Hey, I saw a commit about tightening tree-shaking notes for locales. Can you go to the Zod docs page (specifically the locales section) and take a screenshot to verify that the documentation correctly explains how to import from `zod/locales` instead of the old way? I want to make sure the UI hasn't regressed.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "6796b45390e41371", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:b040e128f569", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bc1d9ea0-7037-406f-82d2-4c03c11246ac"}}
{"id": "4a80375939caeb5c", "prompt": "The CI is failing on the locale update script. Can you look at `scripts/update-iso-4217.ts` and `scripts/triage-signal.ts`? \n\nI suspect `update-iso-4217.ts` is failing because it can't write to the lockfile or permissions are wrong. Check the git history for `packages/zod/package.json` to see how locale updates were handled before commit `d6bc1e3`.\n\nAlso, why is `triage-signal.ts` looking at `.nojekyll`? That seems unrelated.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "4a80375939caeb5c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:8d1f1d5f6e52", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ee1ead6a-db4b-4b63-9413-61ad5f29a690"}}
{"id": "495f03089c3f1171", "prompt": "I need to audit the dependencies for the `packages/zod` package. Can you read `packages/zod/package.json` and list out all the direct dependencies and devDependencies? I want to know if there are any unexpected runtime dependencies.\n\nAlso, check `packages/mini/vitest.config.ts` and verify if it's set up correctly for the mini variant tests.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "495f03089c3f1171", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:565c27fa3a46", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-014", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "578390f4-1ec1-408b-83c2-412c7929b78b"}}
{"id": "d51f48ed36bab5e7", "prompt": "帮我生成一个用于本地开发调试的随机 JWT secret 字符串，长度要在 32 位以上。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d51f48ed36bab5e7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:48375a9044a5", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "775f1424-8d7d-4644-b248-179e686456bb"}}
{"id": "63ea76639a555977", "prompt": "Dans les commits récents, je vois 'Release: stage npm versions instead of publishing them'. Explique-moi ce changement de workflow. Pourquoi on ne publie plus directement sur npm maintenant ? Y a-t-il une étape manuelle ou automatisée intermédiaire ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "63ea76639a555977", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:14509561d3dc", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6948a21-dc93-44a7-877b-d4d39cd1ecce"}}
{"id": "9d5203484edbe328", "prompt": "I need a quick cleanup pass on the docs. \n\n1. In `packages/docs/content/codecs.mdx`, update the import paths from `zod/lib` to just `zod` where applicable since we're on a newer version.\n2. Similarly, fix the paths in `packages/docs/content/api.test.ts`.\n3. Also check `packages/docs/loaders/stars.ts` to see if it needs any type updates.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Great, looks good. Can you build the docs to ensure there are no syntax errors?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9d5203484edbe328", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:495db679934d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b7283b99-7687-41af-bb3b-4a7e6875039c"}}
{"id": "116615296d4f125d", "prompt": "Can you explain the difference between the `v3` and `v4` directory structures in `packages/zod/src`? It looks like there's a `classic` vs `core` split in v4.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "116615296d4f125d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:f140a87f19cf", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d97e4184-bedf-4b43-b026-006da9446897"}}
{"id": "8c62da89a9ca32ea", "prompt": "We're thinking about adding `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` to the `packages/docs` setup. Could you check if it conflicts with the existing `biome.jsonc` configuration?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8c62da89a9ca32ea", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "zod:a91d7bca852f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3fae49a-892b-4a52-ae3d-fa51083c474f"}}
{"id": "1dc3a5c7f2aef26d", "prompt": "Bump the version in package.json to 4.6.9.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Update the changelog in packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx to reflect this version."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "1dc3a5c7f2aef26d", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:91e5f12648f2", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7f422f46-f8b4-4101-99e1-cf9b39569313"}}
{"id": "0871c0f29096894e", "prompt": "packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts のエラーメッセージが少し不自然なので、もう少し簡潔な表現に修正してください。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "他の言語のローカライズファイルと一貫性があるかチェックして。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "0871c0f29096894e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:6eaa3be8ad24", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "221689d3-2c12-4b38-b647-fe0ea90f8bf6"}}
{"id": "1dfc3b7f5bb7b8c6", "prompt": "Consegues contar quantas funções de validação de string estão definidas em `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` e listar quais das novas validações adicionadas na versão 4.6 (como `currencyCode`) estão presentes lá? Preciso de um relatório rápido para atualizar a documentação.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1dfc3b7f5bb7b8c6", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "data_files", "prompt_group": "zod:590db2d1dbd3", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-015", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "978904e8-7d25-43d0-8e2a-c4d9c515e7cb"}}
{"id": "3768087b2a9e3902", "prompt": "The `z.intersection` seems to drop optional keys from the input type when merging two objects.\n\n```ts\nconst A = z.object({ a: z.string().optional() });\nconst B = z.object({ b: z.number() });\nconst C = z.intersection(A, B);\n\nconst result = C.parse({ b: 1 }); // Throws!\n```\n\nIt says it 'missing required key `a`'. But `a` is optional. In v3 this worked fine. Did the handling of optional keys in intersection change in v4?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "3768087b2a9e3902", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:8e5b6246d9d7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc0a0367-aa6e-4b64-8e01-ae70987b7b23"}}
{"id": "c6031d4686fa3159", "prompt": "I'm looking at `packages/zod/src/v4/locales` and it feels messy. Can you refactor the locale exports so they're consistently named? Currently we have `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts`, `es.ts`, etc. I want to standardize on camelCase for the filenames if they aren't already, and ensure the default export in each file matches the filename without the extension. Also update the index at `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/index.ts` to use these new defaults.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c6031d4686fa3159", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:4d7319ec5ea1", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a1e70794-d624-4be8-881e-d3cde306eefc"}}
{"id": "52143e41b513bc61", "prompt": "Who was the last person to modify packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts and what was the commit message?", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Can you show me the diff for that commit?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "52143e41b513bc61", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:e16e15463cd8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "95fe77ff-fdf9-4c8e-965c-a4d88f310730"}}
{"id": "a37a99bbed298790", "prompt": "The `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/global-config.test.ts` file is getting hard to read. Can you refactor it to use a test suite structure with `describe` blocks for each config area? Also, please ensure the imports are sorted alphabetically.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a37a99bbed298790", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:0e8236a9ca22", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c3e43e30-36de-4606-afd9-9ca8125c8ec8"}}
{"id": "8ef4d11ae8c271fc", "prompt": "Find the implementation of the `z.currencyCode()` validator. I need to see where the ISO 4217 list is vendored or generated. Also, trace where `scripts/update-iso-4217.ts` is called in the CI configuration.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "8ef4d11ae8c271fc", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:432f309a1f72", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "911d64c7-2736-467b-a834-66f5fe6f331e"}}
{"id": "e8065fee1dc7a3aa", "prompt": "Dans packages/treeshake/, il y a plusieurs exemples de bundle size. Pourquoi y a-t-il un test pour zod3-full et un pour zod-mini ? Quelle est la différence fondamentale de taille et de fonctionnalités entre les deux ? Explique-moi comment choisir entre les deux pour un projet frontend.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Est-ce que zod-mini supporte tous les types de la v4 ?"}, {"prompt": "Y a-t-il des benchmarks de performance entre les deux versions ?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e8065fee1dc7a3aa", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:f45febda61e3", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "dc4f5071-05ed-4a1c-9635-69cd87775fb8"}}
{"id": "7af4799f5450f60c", "prompt": "I'm looking at packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/object.test.ts and I want to understand the recommended patterns for handling unknown keys in the new v4 API. Can you check the Zod v4 documentation on schema conversion or error handling to see if there's a specific guide on replacing `.passthrough()` or `.strip()` behavior compared to v3?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "7af4799f5450f60c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs_online", "prompt_group": "zod:f61633fdf0f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c92d2edf-c0cc-445a-ad9d-5bd514970c28"}}
{"id": "722e30d3a38b10a5", "prompt": "I need to trace how the `z.object()` shape is inferred. Specifically, look at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` and find the `object()` function definition. Then, find where `ZodObject` is defined in the core module.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "722e30d3a38b10a5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:b2278bbb0211", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-016", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "c4aa5cf2-4ff5-4153-a05b-6fe84f016239"}}
{"id": "ed0bbdf28ddead41", "prompt": "I've been playing around with some changes in `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` but they aren't ready. Stash my current work so I have a clean directory.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ed0bbdf28ddead41", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:d1e12e33eb57", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3a42a7f7-4c05-40df-acbc-c21525651041"}}
{"id": "7d8e5653af920505", "prompt": "Hey, the z.lazy() recursion is hitting max call stack size in my schema definition. Here's a simplified version:\n\n```ts\nconst Node = z.object({\n  children: z.lazy(() => z.array(Node))\n});\nNode.parse({ children: [{ children: [] }] });\n```\n\nEsse erro tá acontecendo especificamente nas versões mais recentes do mini parser. Pode verificar o packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts? Acho que a pilha de chamadas do lazy não tá sendo resolvida corretamente antes do parse.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "7d8e5653af920505", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:b9a214a01d24", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f6868379-4650-4a7e-a96e-cd57d46d6289"}}
{"id": "90bf63d0e0d7731e", "prompt": "Can we add an option to disable default locale messages? \n\nI'm building a multi-tenant app where each user has their own locale. Currently, if I import `z.locales`, it seems to globally affect all validation errors unless I'm using the new v4 core APIs strictly. I'm still using the classic API for some legacy schemas.\n\nSpecifically, `z.string().email()` returns an error in French for me even though I'm in an English-only environment because I imported the locale file for testing earlier. Is there a way to isolate this?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "90bf63d0e0d7731e", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:912ec79ff60c", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "09e685ba-f7a7-484f-a056-30cde920c61b"}}
{"id": "535f710fbad33fab", "prompt": "I'm investigating a memory leak report. Check `packages/bench/memory/leaks.ts` and `packages/bench/memory/breakdown.ts`. What are the specific allocation patterns being tested?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "535f710fbad33fab", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:46a7e7be1491", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bf5f19d2-c542-4c12-9d87-d781390cb587"}}
{"id": "b8f2cbd3c5e225e3", "prompt": "hey, `z.currencyCode()` seems to be ignoring the new ISO 4217 list updates. I saw commit `d6bc1e3` added it but the CI script `scripts/update-iso-4217.ts` might not be running correctly or the validation is cached.\n\nSpecifically, `z.currencyCode().parse(\"ZZZ\")` passes validation in some environments but shouldn't. Can you check the locale implementation in `packages/zod/src/v4/locales/en.ts` and the validation logic in `packages/zod/src/v4/core`?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "b8f2cbd3c5e225e3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:ae801ac46b42", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ec5cee43-a09d-4eac-a224-725f75cfa245"}}
{"id": "dc8432417fa8616c", "prompt": "What code handles the `z.coerce` functionality in Zod Mini? I see `packages/zod/src/v4/mini/coerce.ts` but I want to see how it's actually used in the test suite.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "dc8432417fa8616c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:1f5bbb33d4f8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "966a2410-3cac-4d6f-a5c3-368e4334aadc"}}
{"id": "bd5a8ee3dbeae3d0", "prompt": "show me all files that import from `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/index.ts`. I want to make sure changing the export signature of `z.string()` doesn't break the docs build.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "bd5a8ee3dbeae3d0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:01e94aeb3f3f", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1776e254-8aa8-42e0-acb4-c9c989c5b2a3"}}
{"id": "ba4f76b7cd928c7a", "prompt": "Add a new test case to `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/stringbool.test.ts` that verifies the behavior when passing a boolean to a string schema.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ba4f76b7cd928c7a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:9877aa2bc20e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-017", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9a82f87a-a769-4e4c-bae7-da11055a3e52"}}
{"id": "727a2eabb8797778", "prompt": "start the dev server for packages/docs so I can preview the changes I made to the v4 changelog page", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "The page isn't loading the new CSS, can you check if biome needs to be run?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "727a2eabb8797778", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:65d8d6496893", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e590c2a1-8230-4bef-9e45-02e29e914ba1"}}
{"id": "a38195bc47c20ebf", "prompt": "Necesito saber si el endpoint de la API de GitHub para issues de `colinhacks/zod` está retornando un JSON válido o si está haciendo rate limiting. Haz una petición GET a la ruta de issues abiertos y muéstrame el código de estado HTTP y las primeras 3 líneas del cuerpo.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a38195bc47c20ebf", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:90c78b860a90", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "939169b3-7227-4929-8cfb-24b08da58d59"}}
{"id": "c34262dff0a05ac1", "prompt": "帮我打开一个交互式的 zsh 终端会话，我需要手动运行一些调试命令。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c34262dff0a05ac1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:e10481290234", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "ae370839-f455-44e9-a1d2-8289efe1bda3"}}
{"id": "2f9707c9b8d72c55", "prompt": "L'erreur 'TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'parse')' apparaît quand j'essaie d'utiliser zod. Je fais import { z } from 'zod'. C'est normal que z soit undefined ? Quelle est la différence entre les imports depuis 'zod/src/v4' et 'zod' normalement ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2f9707c9b8d72c55", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:e841211a8df3", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f57ae712-6f63-414e-89ef-1c1fcd926597"}}
{"id": "c2573c682c5f0b5f", "prompt": "Je regarde le fichier packages/docs/content/v4/changelog.mdx et je vois que la v4 a introduit z.currencyCode(). Quel est le format de la liste ISO 4217 utilisée ? Est-ce que c'est hardcoded ou généré dynamiquement ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "c2573c682c5f0b5f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:7ae082ce167d", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6a6f7feb-14a5-446f-8f38-617ea5979caf"}}
{"id": "99a7bab8076e35f1", "prompt": "hey, can you just run the benchmarks in packages/bench? specifically `packages/bench/memory/leaks.ts`. I'm seeing high memory usage in prod and want to baseline it.\n\nfollow_ups:\n[\"What's the RSS growth over 30 seconds?\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "What's the RSS growth over 30 seconds?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "99a7bab8076e35f1", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:15f237f98143", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "15a2b9f1-90a5-41db-985d-0ad64ecf476d"}}
{"id": "35e26f6024c12c07", "prompt": "检查 `packages/resolution/src/index.ts` 和 `packages/treeshake` 相关的逻辑。我担心在动态导入第三方 schema 库（比如 zod-mini 或 valibot）时，有没有路径遍历或者任意代码执行的风险？看看 `bundle-size.test.ts` 里是怎么处理这些导入的。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "35e26f6024c12c07", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "security", "prompt_group": "zod:7dd0e9f65ecf", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e503390d-c15a-40f9-8c8f-3588b1fec22b"}}
{"id": "a7c7fb891aa32d38", "prompt": "I need to verify that the `z.currencyCode` change didn't break the standard schema interface. Run `vitest run packages/zod/src/v4/core/tests/locales/parity.test.ts`", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "a7c7fb891aa32d38", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:33b317678703", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-018", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "838fb7e7-1beb-409e-ab51-38a947320f8b"}}
{"id": "454fb2fa8d5d236f", "prompt": "Faz um grep rápido em todo o `packages/zod/src` procurando por `TODO` ou `FIXME`. Me manda uma lista com o arquivo e a linha. Só isso.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "454fb2fa8d5d236f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:dffa8546d436", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "471d0e52-ff89-4f4b-a26e-c36393a9332c"}}
{"id": "2d815f0c9c1b9c72", "prompt": "update the docs in `packages/docs/content/codecs.mdx` to reflect that `z.locales` is now tree-shakeable if imported correctly.\n\nThe README says:\n> docs: tighten the z.locales tree-shaking note\n\nBut the docs page still recommends `import * as z from 'zod'` then `z.en`. It should probably say `import { en } from 'zod/locales/en'` for better tree shaking.\n\nAlso fix the example in `packages/treeshake/zod-mini-boolean.ts` to match the new import path.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2d815f0c9c1b9c72", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:9b0e4974ed61", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "2937056a-e5f8-43b9-ac32-f11fd4accbc3"}}
{"id": "570142fe788f08f3", "prompt": "I'm looking at `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/async-refinements.test.ts`. Can you explain how the test suite validates that an async refinement correctly propagates the promise through the validation chain?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "570142fe788f08f3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:20667ca60732", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "551b1049-46b9-4af4-878e-022315e18990"}}
{"id": "e83a39397ef58858", "prompt": "Can you list all the branches in this repo?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "e83a39397ef58858", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:ccf4172100d3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3c58632c-be95-4594-9845-dcd3ecf5b2c1"}}
{"id": "62f37bf788f6e0d9", "prompt": "packages/bench/memory/leaks.ts をコピーして、packages/bench/memory/throughput.ts のリファクタリングに使えるように準備して。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "62f37bf788f6e0d9", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:3ce2a2509968", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "1e4f7f31-d468-43d3-b829-9fc0d2657a86"}}
{"id": "9342cbad6912908f", "prompt": "Estou tentando usar z.record() para validar um mapa de chaves arbitrárias, mas quando a chave é um número, o Zod está transformando em string e validando como string, o que quebra minha lógica downstream. O schema é: z.record(z.number(), z.string()). Quando passo { \"1\": \"a\" }, ele deveria validar como chave numérica, não como string '1'. Alguém sabe se isso é intenção? packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/record.test.ts tem um teste falhando agora.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Isso impacta minha API porque os tipos de entrada vêm de um backend que usa int como chave."}, {"prompt": "Já verifiquei a documentação e não encontrei nada sobre coerção de chaves de record."}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "9342cbad6912908f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:1058ffff5b86", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "bde109be-25f9-4284-847f-91667f6d5c2e"}}
{"id": "eadd1269eb302757", "prompt": "I need to see the full content of the commit 2bf7b06.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eadd1269eb302757", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:ed7cfe934b13", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fc2627e7-10de-436f-b001-1a62b6ad3bcd"}}
{"id": "024d7ae3bff51d57", "prompt": "I'm seeing a lot of noise from .DS_Store and *.log files in git status. Please add them to .gitignore so we stop committing them accidentally.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "024d7ae3bff51d57", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:1adaa237d5b8", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-019", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b4d38829-5f39-46d8-ae3f-433afe9265fc"}}
{"id": "1977d03e622f5176", "prompt": "I'm halfway through refactoring `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts` and it's breaking the build. Can you restore my work from the stash I made earlier?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1977d03e622f5176", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:e5c88318ca03", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6caf7d36-e000-43c5-9c68-1d6332f8c2a5"}}
{"id": "ab035119487d1387", "prompt": "compare the changes in packages/zod/src/v4/core/util.ts between the current version and the 4.6.3 release.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "ab035119487d1387", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:49ae8db161c4", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "472da45c-3263-4244-93db-0c10552d4ab7"}}
{"id": "945fae7004304c60", "prompt": "I've been working on some updates to the documentation in `packages/docs/content/`. Can you look at my unstaged changes, split them into two logical commits—one for the new API section and one for fixing typos—and commit them?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "945fae7004304c60", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:df96484d2a18", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "3ac4c370-135a-44c5-9731-7efbe133b1ca"}}
{"id": "fc86c27ffc91ce31", "prompt": "Why is z.currencyCode() not tree-shaking properly? I imported it from zod/locales in packages/treeshake/example.ts but the bundle size tests are still failing. Check the recent commit that added it.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "Okay, so the export path is wrong. Fix packages/treeshake/zod-default-import.ts to use the correct path."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "fc86c27ffc91ce31", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:f77577bca670", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "eeb5bcd9-d536-42fa-926c-bdabe427ea49"}}
{"id": "8f61cf70602da3e0", "prompt": "Hola, ¿podrías verificar el estado actual de la página de estado oficial de Zod? Me preocupa que haya una interrupción general y necesito confirmarlo antes de lanzar mi aplicación.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8f61cf70602da3e0", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "web", "prompt_group": "zod:6f94984e0989", "lang": "es", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "be51064a-1270-47f0-94cc-daa60f0ec30c"}}
{"id": "91df2636b46dc162", "prompt": "Check `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts`. How is the `StandardSchema` type implemented and what are the mandatory properties for a compatible schema?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "91df2636b46dc162", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:b1a30408f694", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d2e97247-7d35-4424-9aa6-4d11f01a82c2"}}
{"id": "2918c4f6ce9ce129", "prompt": "Analyze `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/async-refinements.test.ts`. How does Zod handle the transition from synchronous to asynchronous validation when a refinement is marked async?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2918c4f6ce9ce129", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:f290c4dc955e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "cbb42b28-4db1-4f21-94e9-abd38e72b4f5"}}
{"id": "2b6345271a03e053", "prompt": "I'm looking at `packages/zod/src/v4/core/visit.ts`. Can you explain the logic behind the visitor pattern used here? I need to understand how it traverses schemas for transformations.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "How does this interact with the `standard-schema` implementation in `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts`?"}], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "2b6345271a03e053", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:de86a9b82adb", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-020", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "fed411e1-4623-4ec9-a89e-1a5daf61825c"}}
{"id": "de9e472b2601efd6", "prompt": "Fix the type safety in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts`.\n\nI noticed that `z.string().email()` doesn't infer the string restriction properly in some contexts. We need to ensure that the return type of regex-based refinements includes the correct literal constraints if possible, or at least updates the JSDoc tags correctly.\n\nAlso check `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts` for any mismatches.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "de9e472b2601efd6", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "refactor", "prompt_group": "zod:0467a6437d55", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "adce083a-2b0d-42b0-a15c-22ecb42ebd09"}}
{"id": "18627db445283f8f", "prompt": "帮我检查一下当前系统里有没有正在占用 3000 端口的进程，如果有的话直接把它杀掉。", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "确认进程已经彻底关闭了。"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "18627db445283f8f", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:44f3a290de2f", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "02c23e0c-be44-43f6-b465-7912381c4fd7"}}
{"id": "13af51b2a350d5f3", "prompt": "I just merged #6622. Can you verify that the staging step works? Run `npm publish --dry-run` or whatever the equivalent is in this repo to make sure assets are being excluded correctly.\n\nfollow_ups\": [\n\"Check if the .npmignore or package.json files are updated correctly.\"]\n]", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "13af51b2a350d5f3", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:c135676cae2d", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7e017047-f486-4fd3-aadd-76f1974d84a7"}}
{"id": "ca186c54e15e60f4", "prompt": "can you find the commit where they added z.currencyCode()? I want to see the implementation details in the diff.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "show me the related changes in scripts/update-iso-4217.ts"}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "ca186c54e15e60f4", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "git_history", "prompt_group": "zod:96ea189478be", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "53ed3e7b-de67-4b64-9ed7-aab3204688ee"}}
{"id": "8088ef4584351ad4", "prompt": "Je vois que les locales sont dans packages/zod/src/v4/locales/. Est-ce que je peux utiliser uniquement la locale fr sans charger toute la pile de locales ? Comment faire pour tree-shake les autres langues ?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "8088ef4584351ad4", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "question", "prompt_group": "zod:af177e3815ca", "lang": "fr", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "a3c943be-96a2-421a-a1e9-ef31bd76b766"}}
{"id": "d4b1f9cbbc8237c2", "prompt": "Something went wrong with the last merge. Revert the commit `d821685` but keep the changes as unstaged so I can manually inspect them.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "d4b1f9cbbc8237c2", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "commit", "prompt_group": "zod:95405262bda0", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "80f544ba-8614-443e-8f62-c8b92bd6160a"}}
{"id": "1b9bdf5a6a538d48", "prompt": "Run the linter and fix any issues it reports.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "1b9bdf5a6a538d48", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:7d1787471378", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "e1ed0849-510f-4ebd-a837-eff293aa9958"}}
{"id": "d9a0e776c5faade7", "prompt": "Rodando `pnpm format` e depois `pnpm lint --fix` para limpar o repositório. Me avisa se bater algum erro grave.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "d9a0e776c5faade7", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "chores", "prompt_group": "zod:71f0a9652b67", "lang": "pt", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-021", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "038126b2-dcc6-4287-8e0d-b9de46c8e20e"}}
{"id": "81a6cd2b87d0c1e8", "prompt": "帮我看看是不是有一个 node 进程卡住了，占用 CPU 特别高，帮我找到它并停止运行。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "81a6cd2b87d0c1e8", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "ops", "prompt_group": "zod:17d127050753", "lang": "zh", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "d462495c-d653-4f4b-923a-ee06cbd4c1d2"}}
{"id": "c35627e6ec3ddba5", "prompt": "The `z.discriminatedUnion` is throwing when used with `z.anyunknown()` as a fallback.\n\n```ts\nconst schema = z.discriminatedUnion(\"type\", [\n  z.object({ type: z.literal(\"a\"), val: z.anyunknown() }),\n]);\n```\n\nError:\n```text\nZodError: Invalid discriminator value. Expected 'a' | 'b' but received undefined.\n```\n\nBut the input clearly has `{ type: 'a', val: null }`. This is happening in `packages/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/discriminated-unions.test.ts`. Can you spot the issue in the discriminator key extraction?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "c35627e6ec3ddba5", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "bugfix", "prompt_group": "zod:bd261365d0f3", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "f3df609d-307e-479b-bc52-6939902ee6aa"}}
{"id": "069997e3ffd36f75", "prompt": "I'm looking at `packages/zod/src/v4/core/standard-schema.ts`. Can you explain how this integrates with the Standard Schema specification?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "069997e3ffd36f75", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "explain_code", "prompt_group": "zod:1361e680f559", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "86cae7b0-84e7-48dd-b36d-5f680da6922b"}}
{"id": "148f7aaa97343e8a", "prompt": "The z.object() validation is throwing a TypeError saying 'Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'keys')'. I'm using the z.v4 import. Can you check packages/zod/src/v4/classic/schemas.ts to see if the object shape typing is mismatched or if there's a recent regression in the type inference?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "148f7aaa97343e8a", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "run_and_verify", "prompt_group": "zod:ca8a20179d58", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "timeout", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "51aab497-7873-49bb-81dd-be4b1e52de1c"}}
{"id": "a38e72e4ed5b12bd", "prompt": "packages/docs/content/api.test.ts の中身を確認して、もし重複しているテストコードがあれば整理してください。", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "a38e72e4ed5b12bd", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "small_change", "prompt_group": "zod:4a0f41317b93", "lang": "ja", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "7f49d30a-194e-4e7b-9f88-cd2cbad62b3b"}}
{"id": "f6d56cf1868daf8c", "prompt": "Update packages/docs-v3/CHANGELOG.md to include a note about the new z.currencyCode() feature and the performance improvements from the recent 4.6.x patches.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "f6d56cf1868daf8c", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "docs", "prompt_group": "zod:1ea43a436e51", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": "implement-dispatch"}, "workflow": "implement-dispatch", "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "6209822e-28de-4bf1-b8df-c7987cf2047b"}}
{"id": "316f25bb054e72aa", "prompt": "The `pnpm-lock.yaml` is getting huge. Can you run a check to see which dependencies in the workspace are currently unused, specifically looking at the `packages/bench` folder?", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "316f25bb054e72aa", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "zod:53fd345d6ff7", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "9baaf37f-62a2-4469-af2c-c260650dd06b"}}
{"id": "eea78957f9f547eb", "prompt": "Where is the 'object-in-es5-env' compatibility tested? I'm seeing failures when bundling for older browsers. Look in `packages/zod/src/v3/tests/` first.", "follow_ups": [], "provider_id": "vllm-qwen3-6-35b-a3b", "model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "meta": {"task_id": "eea78957f9f547eb", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "locate", "prompt_group": "zod:b7590a48405e", "lang": "en", "author_model": "qwen3.6-35b-a3b", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-022", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "b3c466b3-030c-430d-8e8d-e4c772e856ab"}}
{"id": "97ae5b15498e9055", "prompt": "I want to see if upgrading `vitest` would improve our test execution speed in `packages/zod/vitest.config.ts`. Check the current version in `package.json` and see if there's a stable major version bump available.", "follow_ups": [{"prompt": "If an upgrade is available, check the changelog for any breaking changes related to `packages/zod/src/v4/` tests."}], "provider_id": "vllm-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "meta": {"task_id": "97ae5b15498e9055", "repo": "zod", "split": "holdout", "archetype": "dependencies", "prompt_group": "zod:350c94e31d1b", "lang": "en", "author_model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "workflow": null}, "outcome": {"status": "settled", "run": "pass1v3b", "shard": "zod-023", "pass_name": "engine-off", "root_session": "118220f9-c7f4-49e2-b5d0-5d5d29675a4d"}}