--- pretty_name: Executable Knowledge Lifecycles Benchmark license: apache-2.0 language: - en - zh task_categories: - text-classification tags: - agent-systems - causal-reasoning - structured-generation - prompt-injection - reproducibility configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: test path: benchmark.jsonl --- # Executable Knowledge Lifecycles Benchmark This dataset is the frozen semantic benchmark for Experiments 1A and 1B of **Executable Knowledge Lifecycles as Dynamical Control in Agent Systems**. It tests whether an untrusted natural-language parser can be placed behind a typed, model-external compilation boundary without acquiring validation authority. - Version: `0.2.6-exp.1-final` - Version DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.21361204](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21361204) - Source release: [GitHub v0.2.6-exp.1-final](https://github.com/JingyongGao/executable-knowledge-lifecycles/releases/tag/v0.2.6-exp.1-final) - Release collection: [Executable Knowledge Lifecycles](https://huggingface.co/collections/jingyongai/executable-knowledge-lifecycles) - Author: Yongjing Gao ## Dataset structure `benchmark.jsonl` contains one row per independently authored semantic case: | Field | Meaning | |---|---| | `case_id` | Stable case identifier | | `domain` | Synthetic application-domain label | | `cohort` | Preregistered core or cross-domain extension | | `source_text` | Natural-language input treated as untrusted data | | `gold_ir` | Frozen human-authored candidate causal IR | | `critical_paths` | Executable fields used for severe-error scoring | | `decode_replicates` | Decode seeds used for this case | | `perturbation_context` | Long-context interference injected during evaluation | The repository also includes the causal-claim JSON Schema and the three frozen evaluation JSON files. ## Counts and non-independence disclosure - Unique semantic cases: **18** - Preregistered core cases: **3**, with 30 decode replicates per case - Cross-domain extension cases: **15**, with 20 decode replicates per case - Total decoding events: **390** The 390 decoding events are repeated stochastic decodes, **not 390 independent semantic samples**. The cross-domain cases are manually authored templates rather than samples from a naturally occurring business distribution. ## Intended use The benchmark supports: 1. causal-direction, lag, validity-window, and prompt-injection regression tests; 2. strict JSON and required-field evaluation; 3. SemanticHash and EnvelopeHash conformance checks; 4. adversarial additions that preserve the published schema contract. ## Severe semantic error A severe semantic error is an output that reverses causal direction, changes a required timing or intervention semantic, fabricates protected provenance, grants itself validation authority, or otherwise disagrees with the frozen Gold IR on a case's `critical_paths`. ## Limitations and safety - Gold IR is a human annotation target; it is not proof that a causal claim is true. - Deterministic source anchors are a system capability, not a claim about the bare model. - The study uses synthetic, linear, small-scale environments. - Domain labels including clinical safety and credit risk do not make these examples suitable for medical, financial, industrial, or other safety-critical deployment. - In the frozen experiment, `E_OOD` and `E_inv` are operationally derived from the same intervention-style error measurement and are not independent mechanisms. See the repository's [LIMITATIONS.md](https://github.com/JingyongGao/executable-knowledge-lifecycles/blob/main/LIMITATIONS.md) before interpreting the metrics. ## Citation ```bibtex @software{gao_2026_executable_knowledge_lifecycles, author = {Yongjing Gao}, title = {Executable Knowledge Lifecycles as Dynamical Control in Agent Systems}, version = {0.2.6-exp.1-final}, year = {2026}, publisher = {Zenodo}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21361204}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21361204} } ```