--- pretty_name: Decision models × evaluation documents license: other task_categories: - text-classification size_categories: - 100K_glm`, `_deepseek`, `_qwen` | `eval_sample` rows only: labels from GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, given the excerpt alone, with classify-only prompts rebuilt from the pipeline's ([prompts](https://github.com/baobab-tech/decision-models-experiments/blob/main/experiments/common/prompts/excerpt-tagging.md)). Generated 2026-10-03 | | `_majority` | `eval_sample` rows only: labels chosen by at least 2 of the 3 LLMs. The experiment-01 reference | ### `taxonomy` `field`, `code`, `label`, `definition` (document fields only, from the document classification prompt), `definition_excerpts` (themes and methods, from the excerpt extract-and-classify prompts; longer theme definitions), `region` (countries only), `in_documents`, `in_excerpts`. The two flags mark the codes that occur in the silver or pipeline labels; experiments ask over those sets. ## Labels - **Silver (default):** GLM-5.3-Flash relabelled every document through HF Inference Providers. It returns `null` more often than the pipeline (test: approach 18%, temporality 28%). - **Pipeline (`*_pipeline`):** the ingestion pipeline's LLM output; 36 document classifications corrected by hand. - Pipeline labels score 76.2 mean field score against silver on test (exact match 9.0%). - Excerpt tags are pipeline output only. - Codes seen in fewer than 20 documents were dropped upstream. ## Baselines on the same test split Earlier Baobab Tech classifier runs on `documents` test (134), mean field score 0–100, against pipeline labels / against silver: | Model | Zero-shot | Fine-tuned (pipeline / silver) | |---|---|---| | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | 70.1 / 72.9 | 84.4 / 80.3 | | Qwen3.5 4B | 67.1 / 66.2 | 84.7 / 77.8 | | Gemma 4 E4B | 72.3 / 72.1 | 83.0 / 76.8 | | GLiNER2.5 base | 45.4 / 45.2 | 58.4 / 57.2 | ## Licence The reports are publicly published by their organisations, which keep their rights; check each report's terms before reusing its text beyond research. Labels, splits and taxonomy are released by Baobab Tech. No labels in this dataset are human gold labels except the 36 hand-corrected documents (`label_source_pipeline == "manual"`); all others are LLM output.