jrzhang commited on
Commit
ab76aa0
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 2d919e2

Add dataset card: intro, examples, task table, evaluation protocol, headline results

Browse files
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ pretty_name: ActiveVision
3
+ license: cc-by-4.0
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
+ task_categories:
7
+ - visual-question-answering
8
+ - image-text-to-text
9
+ tags:
10
+ - benchmark
11
+ - visual-reasoning
12
+ - iterative-reasoning
13
+ - active-vision
14
+ - multimodal
15
+ - vqa
16
+ - evaluation
17
+ size_categories:
18
+ - n<1K
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ <p align="center">
22
+ <img src="assets/banner.png" alt="ActiveVision — An Exam for Active Observers. Vision is a loop, not a glance." width="820">
23
+ </p>
24
+
25
+ # ActiveVision — An Exam for Active Observers
26
+
27
+ **ActiveVision** is a benchmark for **iterative visual reasoning**: 85 photorealistic
28
+ items across **17 tasks** that cannot be solved from a single glance — the model has
29
+ to keep returning to the image to *scan*, *trace*, and *compare*. Every scene is
30
+ generated by a deterministic program and re-rendered photorealistically while
31
+ preserving the structure, so answers are exact by construction.
32
+
33
+ **Frontier models reach about 10%** with pure chain-of-thought (50.6% with an
34
+ autonomous coding agent), while **unaided humans average 96.1%**.
35
+
36
+ 🌐 [Website](https://activevision.dev) · 📄 Paper: coming soon · 💻 Evaluation code: coming soon
37
+
38
+ ## Examples
39
+
40
+ <table>
41
+ <tr>
42
+ <td width="50%" align="center"><img src="assets/example_traverse.jpg" alt="Traversal point ordering example" width="420"></td>
43
+ <td width="50%" align="center"><img src="assets/example_regions.jpg" alt="Region counting example" width="420"></td>
44
+ </tr>
45
+ </table>
46
+
47
+ ## The 17 tasks
48
+
49
+ | Family | Tasks |
50
+ |---|---|
51
+ | **Distributed Scanning** — find and count every signal | bounded_face_counting · connected_component_counting · region_counting · singleton_shape_counting · tangled_loop_counting |
52
+ | **Sequential Traversal** — follow a structure, step by step | arrow_chain_following · color_zone_sequencing · line_intersection_sequencing · maze_path_tracing · traversal_point_ordering |
53
+ | **Visual Attribute Transfer** — compare a property across regions | constellation_match_counting · contour_difference_spotting · field_difference_spotting · signal_difference_spotting · silhouette_match_counting · stroke_difference_spotting · stroke_match_counting |
54
+
55
+ 5 items per task, 85 items total. Each item is **one still image and one question**;
56
+ answers are integers, letters, or ordered sequences — never small multiple choice, so
57
+ the guess floor is near zero.
58
+
59
+ ## Dataset structure
60
+
61
+ ```python
62
+ from datasets import load_dataset
63
+ ds = load_dataset("activevisionai/ActiveVision", split="train")
64
+ # columns: image, id, task, category, question, answer
65
+ ```
66
+
67
+ | Field | Description |
68
+ |---|---|
69
+ | `image` | the photorealistic scene (PNG, up to 1536×1024) |
70
+ | `id` | item id, `<TASK-PREFIX>-<index>` (e.g. `MPT-2`) |
71
+ | `task` | one of the 17 task names above |
72
+ | `category` | task family: `distributed_scanning`, `sequential_traversal`, `visual_attribute_transfer` |
73
+ | `question` | the full question, instructing the model to answer in `<answer>...</answer>` tags |
74
+ | `answer` | ground truth (exact-match scoring, separator-insensitive) |
75
+
76
+ ## Evaluation
77
+
78
+ Score the contents of the model's **last** `<answer>...</answer>` block by exact
79
+ match after normalizing case, whitespace, and separators (`"C, A, G"` ≡ `"CAG"`;
80
+ integer answers also match numerically, `"07"` ≡ `7`).
81
+
82
+ ## Headline results (pure chain-of-thought, best per model)
83
+
84
+ | Model | Accuracy |
85
+ |---|---|
86
+ | Human (N=3, unaided) | **96.1%** |
87
+ | GPT-5.5 (xhigh) | 10.6% |
88
+ | Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | 8.2% |
89
+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro (high) | 5.9% |
90
+ | Claude Opus 4.7 (max) | 4.7% |
91
+ | Claude Fable 5 (max) | 3.5% |
92
+
93
+ ![Accuracy vs API cost per item across reasoning-effort tiers](assets/performance_cost.png)
94
+
95
+ More reasoning does not close the gap: scaling effort moves models along the cost
96
+ axis, not toward the human band. Tool-using coding agents reach at most 50.6%
97
+ (Claude Code, Fable 5) at $2.74–$7.63 and 12–15 minutes per item — a human answers
98
+ unaided in 34 seconds.
99
+
100
+ ## Citation
101
+
102
+ ```bibtex
103
+ @article{zhang2026activevision,
104
+ title = {An Exam for Active Observers},
105
+ author = {Zhang, Jiarui and Tao, Muzi and Wang, Shangshang and Liu, Ollie and Ma, Xuezhe and Neiswanger, Willie},
106
+ journal = {arXiv preprint},
107
+ year = {2026},
108
+ note = {Coming soon}
109
+ }
110
+ ```
assets/banner.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 7a685c9f70186ff61ce22f2b4c27ce5ba96b21f32cc5311c22d5f55559e83ec7
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.13 MB
assets/example_regions.jpg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: ed10d1ee0c519556c0d7f66e20a7a5e6c69b59cefa4a393c1a3705db109de5e5
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 524 kB
assets/example_traverse.jpg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 6afe2f7d5296bd3a34cdb0e9043f672007384c11a813aee056335704a6e737f7
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 462 kB
assets/performance_cost.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: dffd760dc0b7cdc4462f67355c97acba8676651137ed7020fcfe117851937856
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 141 kB