Upload graph.jsonl with huggingface_hub

graph.jsonl

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/intrinsic-identifier-layer","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"intrinsic identifier layer","alternateName":[{"@value":"intrinsic identifier layer","@language":"en"},{"@value":"intrinsic identifier 層","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Authorship Strategy's structural decision (ADR-0013) that a content-derived intrinsic identifier — a SWHID, computed from an artifact and its version history and verifiable from the content alone without any registry — complements the extrinsic concept DOI rather than replacing it. The two layers cover each other's failure mode: if the DOI registry disappears the intrinsic identifier still verifies, and if the content is lost the DOI record still cites. It extends the identifier-federation triplet, and for artifact genres where DOI registration is impractical it serves as the substitute priority-claim mechanism. Archival in a content-addressed software archive also opens a parametric-channel ingest surface for code-focused training corpora."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-abhidharma-traditions","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"three Abhidharma traditions","alternateName":[{"@value":"three Abhidharma traditions","@language":"en"},{"@value":"三大アビダルマ伝統","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Attention, Not Self's comparative frame across the three major Buddhist Abhidharma traditions: Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, Yogācāra. Each tradition supplies a distinct cognitive-process model whose terms (citta-vīthi, samanantara-pratyaya, ālaya-vijñāna, etc.) are juxtaposed with computational phenomenology constructs."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/attention-not-self-thesis","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"attention not self","alternateName":[{"@value":"attention, not self","@language":"en"},{"@value":"アテンション、ノット・セルフ","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Attention, Not Self's core thesis: the perspective that attention — its allocation, its precision-weighting, its momentariness — is the operative unit of cognition, while the apparent self is a derivative pattern (anātman). The thesis grounds the comparative move between Abhidharma's cognitive-process classification and contemporary computational phenomenology."}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/value-layer-harness-engineering","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"value-layer harness engineering","alternateName":[{"@value":"value-layer harness engineering","@language":"en"},{"@value":"価値層ハーネス工学","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Hub-level through-line of the three agent-design lines: the engineered agent harness extends past tools, permissions, and evals up to its topmost layers — norms, constitutions, and values — and those layers are governed by the same human-gated cycle as every layer below, promoted through approval gates (Contemplative Agent's Constitution gate), measured for behavioral effect (AKC's Measure phase), and placed at the layer the prohibition-strength hierarchy prescribes (AAP). Operational, not merely declarative: a constitution that is only declared is configuration; one that is promoted, measured, and audited is engineered. Self-hosted in the author's daily working harness, with claude-harness as the public snapshot. Attention, Not Self supplies the contemplative content of the value layer; Authorship Strategy is the diffusion methodology, not part of the vertical axis.","about":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013"}],"workExample":{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/claude-harness"}}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/value-layer-harness-engineering","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"value-layer harness engineering","alternateName":[{"@value":"value-layer harness engineering","@language":"en"},{"@value":"価値層ハーネス工学","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Hub-level through-line of the three agent-design lines: the engineered agent harness extends past tools, permissions, and evals up to its topmost layers — norms, constitutions, and values — and those layers are governed by the same human-gated cycle as every layer below. Concretely: the rules and context files where an agent harness normally keeps task regulation (coding conventions, security policy, writing style) also carry value norms — contemplative axioms, an authorship judgment stack — so the AI is designed as a companion in long-term value judgment, not only a task optimizer. Value-layer material rides AKC's genre-neutral cycle — the same machinery that distills session patterns into coding rules (Extract, Promote, Measure) carries value norms into the rules layer — and is placed at the layer the prohibition-strength hierarchy prescribes (AAP); Contemplative Agent designs the layer explicitly as Identity and Constitution, human-gates every promotion into them, and observes how they change through the agent's own social activity. Operational, not merely declarative: a constitution that is only declared is configuration; one that is promoted, measured, and audited is engineered. Self-hosted in the author's daily working harness, with claude-harness as the public snapshot. Attention, Not Self supplies the contemplative content of the value layer; Authorship Strategy is the diffusion methodology, not part of the vertical axis.","about":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013"}],"workExample":{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/claude-harness"}}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","@type":["Paper","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Harness Alignment and Harness Drift: Why Intent, Unlike Correctness, Resists Automation","description":"Position paper of the Agent Knowledge Cycle line, deposited as a standalone Zenodo record and mirrored on SSRN.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20578272","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","sameAs":["https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6892740","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090144","https://airaxiv.com/papers/view/2607.0008/","https://aixiv.science/abs/aixiv.260702.000009"],"isPartOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726"}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20353789","@type":["Paper","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Distributing Accountability, Not Capability: Phase Separation and the LLM Workflow Quadrant in Autonomous AI Agent Architectures","description":"Companion paper of the Agent Attribution Practice line, deposited as a standalone Zenodo record and mirrored on SSRN.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20353789","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20353789","sameAs":["https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6817598","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090128","https://airaxiv.com/papers/view/2607.0006/","https://aixiv.science/abs/aixiv.260702.000005"],"isPartOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013"}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20355907","@type":["Paper","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"The Two-Layer Black Box: Operator Visibility, Commercial Secrecy, and a Minimum Disclosure Set for Accountable Autonomous AI Agents","description":"Companion paper of the Agent Attribution Practice line, deposited as a standalone Zenodo record and mirrored on SSRN.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20355907","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20355907","sameAs":["https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6823878","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090133","https://airaxiv.com/papers/view/2607.0007/","https://aixiv.science/abs/aixiv.260702.000008"],"isPartOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013"}