ICML 2026REPRODUCTION

Conditional Coverage Diagnostics for Conformal Prediction

Outcome
4 verified · 2 partial
Independent headline
77.6%
of the true L1 conditional-coverage deviation recovered by cross-fitted LightGBM at n=5,000.

A functional classifier detects heteroskedastic miscoverage missed by coarse ten-group partitioning.

5-fold CV8 fresh seedsindependent code
What was tested
  • Eight-dimensional heteroskedastic Gaussian regression with standard split conformal intervals.
  • L1-, L2-, and KL-ERT from baseline-risk improvement.
  • Over/under decomposition and an explicit in-sample leakage stress test.
Evidence
ERT convergence against test sample size
Independent convergence study. Dashed line is the true L1 deviation.
Claim audit
Verified

Definitions, classifier ordering, asymmetric decomposition, and cross-fitting all reproduced independently.

Scoped or contradicted

Current arXiv Table 2 says 68.9% versus 33.7%; the supplied claim says 68.4% versus 38.3%. Table 4 was not rerun.

Reproducibility boundary

No Hugging Face Job: the token lacks job.write. Public artifacts preserve seeds, outputs, and environment.

0.07194LightGBM L1-ERT at n=5,000
0.00730PartitionWise L1-ERT at n=5,000
0.0282five-fold value versus 0.168 in-sample