#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Example of 1- Setting up an environment for proof search 2- Running MCTS on a simple example, finding a proof 3- Reconstructing the proof from the search tree Usage: # Run the default example python example.py # Run the second example python example.py 1 """ import sys import peano from proofsearch import MonteCarloTreeSearch, TreeSearchNode, HolophrasmNode, UniformPolicy from util import format_blocks_with_indent EXAMPLES = [ { "theory": """ = : [('t : type) -> 't -> 't -> prop]. nat : type. z : nat. s : [nat -> nat]. + : [nat -> nat -> nat]. * : [nat -> nat -> nat]. +_z : [('n : nat) -> (= (+ 'n z) 'n)]. +_s : [('n : nat) -> ('m : nat) -> (= (+ 'n (s 'm)) (s (+ 'n 'm)))]. nat_ind : [('p : [nat -> prop]) -> ('p z) -> [('n : nat) -> ('p 'n) -> ('p (s 'n))] -> [('n : nat) -> ('p 'n)]]. #backward nat_ind. #forward +_z ((+ 'n z) : nat). #forward +_s ((+ 'n (s 'm)) : nat). """, "premises": ['+_z', '+_s', 'rewrite'], "statement": '(= (+ (s z) (s z)) (s (s z)))' }, {"theory": """ prop : type. false : prop. /* Connectives */ not : [prop -> prop]. and : [prop -> prop -> prop]. or : [prop -> prop -> prop]. iff : [prop -> prop -> prop]. /* Introduction rule for conjunction */ #backward and_i. and_i : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> 'P -> 'Q -> (and 'P 'Q)]. /* Elimination rules for conjunction */ #forward and_el ('_ : (and 'P 'Q)). and_el : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> (and 'P 'Q) -> 'P]. #forward and_er ('_ : (and 'P 'Q)). and_er : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> (and 'P 'Q) -> 'Q]. /* Introduction rules for disjunction */ #backward or_il. or_il : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> 'P -> (or 'P 'Q)]. #backward or_ir. or_ir : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> 'Q -> (or 'P 'Q)]. /* Elimination rule for disjunction */ #backward or_e infer infer infer infer subgoal subgoal. or_e : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> ('R : prop) -> (or 'P 'Q) -> ['P -> 'R] -> ['Q -> 'R] -> 'R]. /* Introduction rule for negation */ #backward not_i. not_i : [('P : prop) -> ['P -> false] -> (not 'P)]. /* Elimination rule for negation */ not_e : [('P : prop) -> (not 'P) -> 'P -> false]. #backward exfalso. exfalso : [false -> ('P : prop) -> 'P]. /* Introduction rules for equivalence */ #backward iff_i. iff_i : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> ['P -> 'Q] -> ['Q -> 'P] -> (iff 'P 'Q)]. /* Elimination rules for equivalence */ #forward iff_el ('_ : (iff 'P 'Q)). iff_el : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> (iff 'P 'Q) -> ['P -> 'Q]]. #forward iff_er ('_ : (iff 'P 'Q)). iff_er : [('P : prop) -> ('Q : prop) -> (iff 'P 'Q) -> ['Q -> 'P]]. /* Excluded middle */ #forward em. em : [('P : prop) -> (or 'P (not 'P))]. """, "premises": ['and_i', 'and_el', 'and_er', 'or_il', 'or_ir', 'or_e', 'not_i', 'not_e', 'exfalso', 'iff_i', 'iff_el', 'iff_er', 'em'], "statement": "(iff false false)", } ] EXAMPLE = EXAMPLES[int(sys.argv[1]) if len(sys.argv) > 1 else 0] initial_state = peano.PyProofState(EXAMPLE["theory"], EXAMPLE["premises"], EXAMPLE["statement"]) root = TreeSearchNode(HolophrasmNode([initial_state])) mcts = MonteCarloTreeSearch(UniformPolicy({})) solved, pi, _, it = mcts.evaluate(root) assert solved print(format_blocks_with_indent(root.reconstruct_proof()))