Datasets:
Tasks:
Tabular Regression
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
roller-compaction
pharmaceutical-manufacturing
design-of-experiments
response-surface-methodology
quality-by-design
synthetic-data
License:
File size: 5,306 Bytes
2461c9a | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 | {
"cells": [
{"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
"# Roller Compaction DOE/RSM — Sample Analysis\n",
"\n",
"**Dataset:** Roller Compaction: Ribbon Density vs. Process Parameters (Synthetic) v1.0\n",
"**Publisher:** [Innovative Process Applications (IPA)](https://www.innovativeprocess.com)\n",
"**License:** CC BY 4.0\n",
"\n",
"> This is **synthetic educational data**. See `README.md` for the physical model (Johanson + Heckel) used to generate it.\n",
"\n",
"This notebook walks through a typical Quality-by-Design workflow:\n",
"1. Load and explore the data\n",
"2. Fit a response surface (quadratic) model for ribbon density\n",
"3. Identify the operating window that maximizes density while keeping uniformity (CV%) under 3%"
]},
{"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
"import pandas as pd\n",
"import numpy as np\n",
"import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n",
"from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression\n",
"from sklearn.preprocessing import PolynomialFeatures\n",
"from sklearn.metrics import r2_score\n",
"\n",
"df = pd.read_csv('ribbon_density_v1.0.csv')\n",
"print(df.shape)\n",
"df.head()"
]},
{"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": ["## 1. Explore the process parameters"]},
{"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
"fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(14, 4))\n",
"axes[0].scatter(df['roll_force_kN_per_cm'], df['ribbon_rel_density'], alpha=0.4)\n",
"axes[0].set_xlabel('Roll force (kN/cm)'); axes[0].set_ylabel('Relative density')\n",
"axes[0].set_title('Force → density (Heckel)')\n",
"\n",
"axes[1].scatter(df['feed_screw_rpm']/df['roll_speed_rpm'], df['density_CV_percent'], alpha=0.4, color='C1')\n",
"axes[1].set_xlabel('Feed/roll speed ratio'); axes[1].set_ylabel('Density CV %')\n",
"axes[1].set_title('Feed ratio → uniformity')\n",
"\n",
"axes[2].scatter(df['peak_pressure_MPa'], df['ribbon_rel_density'], alpha=0.4, color='C2')\n",
"axes[2].set_xlabel('Peak nip pressure (MPa)'); axes[2].set_ylabel('Relative density')\n",
"axes[2].set_title('Pressure → density')\n",
"plt.tight_layout(); plt.show()"
]},
{"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
"## 2. Fit a quadratic response surface\n",
"\n",
"Classic RSM model: ribbon density as a quadratic function of the three main process parameters."
]},
{"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
"X = df[['roll_force_kN_per_cm', 'roll_speed_rpm', 'feed_screw_rpm']].values\n",
"y = df['ribbon_rel_density'].values\n",
"\n",
"poly = PolynomialFeatures(degree=2, include_bias=False)\n",
"Xp = poly.fit_transform(X)\n",
"model = LinearRegression().fit(Xp, y)\n",
"y_pred = model.predict(Xp)\n",
"print(f'R² = {r2_score(y, y_pred):.3f}')\n",
"\n",
"plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))\n",
"plt.scatter(y, y_pred, alpha=0.4)\n",
"plt.plot([y.min(), y.max()], [y.min(), y.max()], 'k--')\n",
"plt.xlabel('Observed rel. density'); plt.ylabel('Predicted')\n",
"plt.title('RSM fit'); plt.show()"
]},
{"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
"## 3. Find the design space\n",
"\n",
"QbD asks: which combinations of process parameters give us a target density **AND** acceptable uniformity?\n",
"\n",
"Let's define an acceptable region as: relative density ≥ 0.70 AND density CV% ≤ 3.0%."
]},
{"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
"in_spec = (df['ribbon_rel_density'] >= 0.70) & (df['density_CV_percent'] <= 3.0)\n",
"print(f'{in_spec.sum()} of {len(df)} runs meet spec ({100*in_spec.mean():.1f}%)')\n",
"\n",
"fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(7, 5))\n",
"ax.scatter(df.loc[~in_spec, 'roll_force_kN_per_cm'], df.loc[~in_spec, 'feed_screw_rpm']/df.loc[~in_spec, 'roll_speed_rpm'], alpha=0.3, label='Out of spec', color='lightgray')\n",
"ax.scatter(df.loc[in_spec, 'roll_force_kN_per_cm'], df.loc[in_spec, 'feed_screw_rpm']/df.loc[in_spec, 'roll_speed_rpm'], alpha=0.6, label='In spec', color='teal')\n",
"ax.set_xlabel('Roll force (kN/cm)'); ax.set_ylabel('Feed/roll ratio')\n",
"ax.set_title('Design space: density ≥ 0.70 AND CV ≤ 3%')\n",
"ax.legend(); plt.show()"
]},
{"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
"## Takeaway\n",
"\n",
"The design space clusters around **roll force ≥ 6 kN/cm** and **feed/roll ratio ≈ 8–15** — consistent with the physics of a well-fed nip on a twin-feed-screw roller compactor.\n",
"\n",
"For production-scale equipment that achieves this operating window consistently, see IPA's CL-series twin-feed-screw compactors: https://www.innovativeprocess.com\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"*Dataset © 2026 Innovative Process Applications, CC BY 4.0. Synthetic educational data — not real measurements.*"
]}
],
"metadata": {
"kernelspec": {"display_name": "Python 3", "language": "python", "name": "python3"},
"language_info": {"name": "python", "version": "3.11"}
},
"nbformat": 4,
"nbformat_minor": 5
}
|