IPA-Marketing commited on
Commit
821bbc4
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f117d31

Upload 6 files

Browse files

Initial upload: control performance dataset v1.0

IPA_Control_Performance_Analysis.ipynb ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "cells": [
3
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
4
+ "# \ud83c\udfae Roll Compactor Control Performance: PID Analysis & SPC\n",
5
+ "\n",
6
+ "**Dataset:** Roll Compactor Control Performance (Synthetic) v1.0 \n",
7
+ "**Publisher:** [Innovative Process Applications (IPA)](https://www.innovativeprocess.com) \n",
8
+ "**License:** CC BY 4.0 \n",
9
+ "**Scientific basis:** Szappanos-Csord\u00e1s (2018), Chapter 3.1\n",
10
+ "\n",
11
+ "> \u26a0\ufe0f **Synthetic educational data** \u2014 not real measurements.\n",
12
+ "\n",
13
+ "---\n",
14
+ "\n",
15
+ "This notebook covers:\n",
16
+ "1. Load both summary and time-series data\n",
17
+ "2. Visualize PID step responses across control architectures\n",
18
+ "3. Compare control quality metrics (CV%, settling time, overshoot)\n",
19
+ "4. Build SPC control charts\n",
20
+ "5. Quantify the twin feed screw advantage\n",
21
+ "6. Classify control quality from time-series features"
22
+ ]},
23
+
24
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
25
+ "import pandas as pd\n",
26
+ "import numpy as np\n",
27
+ "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n",
28
+ "import seaborn as sns\n",
29
+ "from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier\n",
30
+ "from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder\n",
31
+ "from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score\n",
32
+ "\n",
33
+ "sns.set_style('whitegrid')\n",
34
+ "plt.rcParams['figure.dpi'] = 100\n",
35
+ "\n",
36
+ "# Load data\n",
37
+ "df_summary = pd.read_csv('control_performance_summary_v1.0.csv')\n",
38
+ "df_ts = pd.read_csv('control_performance_timeseries_v1.0.csv')\n",
39
+ "\n",
40
+ "print(f'Summary: {df_summary.shape[0]} runs, {df_summary.shape[1]} columns')\n",
41
+ "print(f'Time series: {df_ts.shape[0]} rows, {df_ts.shape[1]} columns')\n",
42
+ "print(f'Control architectures: {df_summary[\"control_architecture\"].unique()}')\n",
43
+ "df_summary.head()"
44
+ ]},
45
+
46
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
47
+ "## Part 1: PID Step Response Visualization\n",
48
+ "\n",
49
+ "The defining characteristic of a PID controller is its step response \u2014 how\n",
50
+ "the actual value tracks a setpoint change. We\u2019ll compare the four control\n",
51
+ "architectures responding to the same SCF step-up scenario."
52
+ ]},
53
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
54
+ "# Pick one material and one scenario to compare architectures\n",
55
+ "scenario = 'scf_step_up'\n",
56
+ "material = 'MCC_Mannitol_Mix'\n",
57
+ "\n",
58
+ "architectures = ['no_gap_control', 'pid_gw_screw', 'pid_scf_gw', 'pid_scf_gw_twin_screw']\n",
59
+ "labels = ['No Gap Control', 'PID: GW+Screw', 'PID: SCF+GW', 'PID: SCF+GW+Twin Screw']\n",
60
+ "colors = ['#cc4444', '#d4a017', '#2E86C1', '#008080']\n",
61
+ "\n",
62
+ "fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(14, 8), sharex=True)\n",
63
+ "\n",
64
+ "for arch, label, color in zip(architectures, labels, colors):\n",
65
+ " run = df_summary[(df_summary['control_architecture']==arch) &\n",
66
+ " (df_summary['material']==material) &\n",
67
+ " (df_summary['scenario']==scenario)]\n",
68
+ " if len(run) == 0:\n",
69
+ " continue\n",
70
+ " rid = run.iloc[0]['run_id']\n",
71
+ " ts = df_ts[df_ts['run_id']==rid]\n",
72
+ "\n",
73
+ " axes[0].plot(ts['time_s'], ts['scf_actual_kN_per_cm'], label=label,\n",
74
+ " color=color, alpha=0.8, linewidth=1.2)\n",
75
+ " axes[1].plot(ts['time_s'], ts['gw_actual_mm'], label=label,\n",
76
+ " color=color, alpha=0.8, linewidth=1.2)\n",
77
+ "\n",
78
+ "# Setpoint lines\n",
79
+ "axes[0].axhline(4.0, color='gray', linestyle=':', alpha=0.5)\n",
80
+ "axes[0].axhline(8.0, color='gray', linestyle=':', alpha=0.5)\n",
81
+ "axes[0].axvline(30, color='black', linestyle='--', alpha=0.3, label='Setpoint change')\n",
82
+ "axes[0].set_ylabel('SCF (kN/cm)')\n",
83
+ "axes[0].set_title(f'PID Step Response Comparison \\u2014 SCF Step Up (4\\u21928 kN/cm), {material}')\n",
84
+ "axes[0].legend(loc='lower right', fontsize=9)\n",
85
+ "\n",
86
+ "axes[1].axvline(30, color='black', linestyle='--', alpha=0.3)\n",
87
+ "axes[1].set_ylabel('Gap Width (mm)')\n",
88
+ "axes[1].set_xlabel('Time (s)')\n",
89
+ "axes[1].set_title('Gap Width Response During SCF Step Change')\n",
90
+ "axes[1].legend(loc='upper right', fontsize=9)\n",
91
+ "\n",
92
+ "plt.tight_layout()\n",
93
+ "plt.show()\n",
94
+ "\n",
95
+ "print('Key observations:')\n",
96
+ "print('- No gap control: slow approach, steady-state offset, noisy')\n",
97
+ "print('- PID SCF+GW: overshoot then clean settling')\n",
98
+ "print('- Twin screw: tightest band, fastest settling, least noise')"
99
+ ]},
100
+
101
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
102
+ "## Part 2: Control Quality Metrics by Architecture\n",
103
+ "\n",
104
+ "CV% (coefficient of variation) is the primary metric from Chapter 3.1 of\n",
105
+ "the dissertation. Lower CV = more robust process."
106
+ ]},
107
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
108
+ "fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(16, 4))\n",
109
+ "\n",
110
+ "order = ['no_gap_control', 'pid_gw_screw', 'pid_scf_gw', 'pid_scf_gw_twin_screw']\n",
111
+ "palette = ['#cc4444', '#d4a017', '#2E86C1', '#008080']\n",
112
+ "\n",
113
+ "sns.boxplot(data=df_summary, x='control_architecture', y='scf_ss_cv_pct',\n",
114
+ " order=order, palette=palette, ax=axes[0])\n",
115
+ "axes[0].set_title('SCF Steady-State CV%')\n",
116
+ "axes[0].set_ylabel('CV %')\n",
117
+ "axes[0].tick_params(axis='x', rotation=30)\n",
118
+ "axes[0].set_xlabel('')\n",
119
+ "\n",
120
+ "sns.boxplot(data=df_summary, x='control_architecture', y='gw_ss_cv_pct',\n",
121
+ " order=order, palette=palette, ax=axes[1])\n",
122
+ "axes[1].set_title('Gap Width Steady-State CV%')\n",
123
+ "axes[1].set_ylabel('CV %')\n",
124
+ "axes[1].tick_params(axis='x', rotation=30)\n",
125
+ "axes[1].set_xlabel('')\n",
126
+ "\n",
127
+ "sns.boxplot(data=df_summary, x='control_architecture', y='scf_settling_time_s',\n",
128
+ " order=order, palette=palette, ax=axes[2])\n",
129
+ "axes[2].set_title('SCF Settling Time')\n",
130
+ "axes[2].set_ylabel('Time (s)')\n",
131
+ "axes[2].tick_params(axis='x', rotation=30)\n",
132
+ "axes[2].set_xlabel('')\n",
133
+ "\n",
134
+ "plt.tight_layout()\n",
135
+ "plt.show()\n",
136
+ "\n",
137
+ "print('\\nMean CV% by architecture:')\n",
138
+ "print(df_summary.groupby('control_architecture')[['scf_ss_cv_pct','gw_ss_cv_pct']].mean().round(2).loc[order])"
139
+ ]},
140
+
141
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
142
+ "## Part 3: Material Effect on Controllability\n",
143
+ "\n",
144
+ "Brittle materials (mannitol) produce more erratic force signals due to\n",
145
+ "particle fragmentation, making the control task harder."
146
+ ]},
147
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
148
+ "fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 4))\n",
149
+ "mat_order = ['MCC_101', 'MCC_Mannitol_Mix', 'Mannitol_SD']\n",
150
+ "mat_colors = ['#008080', '#2E86C1', '#d4a017']\n",
151
+ "\n",
152
+ "sns.boxplot(data=df_summary, x='material', y='scf_ss_cv_pct',\n",
153
+ " order=mat_order, palette=mat_colors, ax=axes[0])\n",
154
+ "axes[0].set_title('SCF CV% by Material')\n",
155
+ "axes[0].set_ylabel('SCF CV %')\n",
156
+ "axes[0].set_xlabel('')\n",
157
+ "\n",
158
+ "sns.boxplot(data=df_summary, x='material', y='gw_ss_cv_pct',\n",
159
+ " order=mat_order, palette=mat_colors, ax=axes[1])\n",
160
+ "axes[1].set_title('Gap Width CV% by Material')\n",
161
+ "axes[1].set_ylabel('GW CV %')\n",
162
+ "axes[1].set_xlabel('')\n",
163
+ "\n",
164
+ "plt.tight_layout()\n",
165
+ "plt.show()\n",
166
+ "\n",
167
+ "print('Interpretation:')\n",
168
+ "print('- MCC (plastic): smoothest compaction, easiest to control')\n",
169
+ "print('- Mannitol (brittle): particle fragmentation creates force spikes')\n",
170
+ "print('- Mixture: intermediate behavior')"
171
+ ]},
172
+
173
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
174
+ "## Part 4: SPC Control Charts\n",
175
+ "\n",
176
+ "Statistical Process Control charts are standard tools in pharma\n",
177
+ "manufacturing. Let\u2019s build X-bar and R charts for a sample run."
178
+ ]},
179
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
180
+ "# Pick the twin-screw + MCC steady-state baseline for the cleanest signal\n",
181
+ "run_spc = df_summary[(df_summary['control_architecture']=='pid_scf_gw_twin_screw') &\n",
182
+ " (df_summary['material']=='MCC_101') &\n",
183
+ " (df_summary['scenario']=='steady_state_baseline')]\n",
184
+ "if len(run_spc) > 0:\n",
185
+ " rid = run_spc.iloc[0]['run_id']\n",
186
+ " ts = df_ts[df_ts['run_id']==rid].copy()\n",
187
+ "\n",
188
+ " # Use only steady-state portion (t > 30s)\n",
189
+ " ts_ss = ts[ts['time_s'] >= 30.0].copy()\n",
190
+ "\n",
191
+ " scf_mean = ts_ss['scf_actual_kN_per_cm'].mean()\n",
192
+ " scf_std = ts_ss['scf_actual_kN_per_cm'].std()\n",
193
+ " ucl = scf_mean + 3 * scf_std\n",
194
+ " lcl = scf_mean - 3 * scf_std\n",
195
+ "\n",
196
+ " fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(14, 4))\n",
197
+ " ax.plot(ts_ss['time_s'], ts_ss['scf_actual_kN_per_cm'],\n",
198
+ " 'o-', markersize=3, color='#008080', alpha=0.7)\n",
199
+ " ax.axhline(scf_mean, color='#1B2A3B', linewidth=2, label=f'CL = {scf_mean:.3f}')\n",
200
+ " ax.axhline(ucl, color='red', linestyle='--', label=f'UCL = {ucl:.3f}')\n",
201
+ " ax.axhline(lcl, color='red', linestyle='--', label=f'LCL = {lcl:.3f}')\n",
202
+ " ax.fill_between(ts_ss['time_s'], lcl, ucl, alpha=0.05, color='red')\n",
203
+ " ax.set_xlabel('Time (s)')\n",
204
+ " ax.set_ylabel('SCF (kN/cm)')\n",
205
+ " ax.set_title(f'X-bar Control Chart \\u2014 Twin Screw PID, MCC 101, Steady State')\n",
206
+ " ax.legend(loc='upper right')\n",
207
+ " plt.tight_layout()\n",
208
+ " plt.show()\n",
209
+ "\n",
210
+ " print(f'Process capability summary:')\n",
211
+ " print(f' Mean: {scf_mean:.3f} kN/cm')\n",
212
+ " print(f' Std: {scf_std:.4f} kN/cm')\n",
213
+ " print(f' CV: {scf_std/scf_mean*100:.2f}%')\n",
214
+ " spec_half = 0.5 # example spec: setpoint +/- 0.5 kN/cm\n",
215
+ " cpk = min(ucl - scf_mean, scf_mean - lcl) / (3 * scf_std)\n",
216
+ " print(f' Cpk (\\u00b13\\u03c3 natural): {cpk:.2f}')"
217
+ ]},
218
+
219
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
220
+ "## Part 5: Twin Feed Screw Advantage\n",
221
+ "\n",
222
+ "This is the key IPA design differentiator. Twin feed screws provide more\n",
223
+ "uniform powder delivery, which directly reduces process variability."
224
+ ]},
225
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
226
+ "# Compare single vs twin screw (both with SCF+GW PID)\n",
227
+ "single = df_summary[df_summary['control_architecture']=='pid_scf_gw']\n",
228
+ "twin = df_summary[df_summary['control_architecture']=='pid_scf_gw_twin_screw']\n",
229
+ "\n",
230
+ "metrics = ['scf_ss_cv_pct', 'gw_ss_cv_pct', 'scf_settling_time_s', 'scf_overshoot_pct']\n",
231
+ "metric_labels = ['SCF CV%', 'GW CV%', 'Settling Time (s)', 'Overshoot %']\n",
232
+ "\n",
233
+ "fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 4, figsize=(16, 4))\n",
234
+ "for ax, metric, mlabel in zip(axes, metrics, metric_labels):\n",
235
+ " data = pd.DataFrame({\n",
236
+ " 'Single Screw': single[metric].values,\n",
237
+ " 'Twin Screw': twin[metric].values,\n",
238
+ " })\n",
239
+ " data.plot.box(ax=ax, color=dict(boxes='#008080', whiskers='gray',\n",
240
+ " medians='#1B2A3B', caps='gray'))\n",
241
+ " ax.set_title(mlabel)\n",
242
+ " ax.set_ylabel(mlabel)\n",
243
+ "\n",
244
+ "plt.suptitle('Single Screw vs. Twin Feed Screw (Same PID Architecture)',\n",
245
+ " fontsize=13, y=1.02)\n",
246
+ "plt.tight_layout()\n",
247
+ "plt.show()\n",
248
+ "\n",
249
+ "print('\\nImprovement with twin screw:')\n",
250
+ "for metric, mlabel in zip(metrics, metric_labels):\n",
251
+ " s = single[metric].mean()\n",
252
+ " t = twin[metric].mean()\n",
253
+ " improvement = (s - t) / s * 100 if s > 0 else 0\n",
254
+ " print(f' {mlabel}: {s:.2f} \\u2192 {t:.2f} ({improvement:+.1f}% improvement)')"
255
+ ]},
256
+
257
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
258
+ "## Part 6: Classify Control Quality from Metrics\n",
259
+ "\n",
260
+ "Can we predict the control quality grade from the summary metrics? This\n",
261
+ "demonstrates how machine learning can support process monitoring."
262
+ ]},
263
+ {"cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": {}, "outputs": [], "source": [
264
+ "# Encode targets and features\n",
265
+ "le = LabelEncoder()\n",
266
+ "y = le.fit_transform(df_summary['control_quality_grade'])\n",
267
+ "\n",
268
+ "feature_cols = ['scf_ss_cv_pct', 'gw_ss_cv_pct', 'scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct',\n",
269
+ " 'gw_deviation_from_setpoint_pct', 'scf_settling_time_s',\n",
270
+ " 'gw_settling_time_s', 'scf_overshoot_pct']\n",
271
+ "X = df_summary[feature_cols].values\n",
272
+ "\n",
273
+ "rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)\n",
274
+ "scores = cross_val_score(rf, X, y, cv=5, scoring='accuracy')\n",
275
+ "print(f'RF 5-fold CV accuracy: {scores.mean():.3f} \\u00b1 {scores.std():.3f}')\n",
276
+ "\n",
277
+ "rf.fit(X, y)\n",
278
+ "importances = pd.Series(rf.feature_importances_, index=feature_cols).sort_values()\n",
279
+ "\n",
280
+ "fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 4))\n",
281
+ "importances.plot.barh(color='#008080', ax=ax)\n",
282
+ "ax.set_title('Feature Importance for Control Quality Grade Prediction')\n",
283
+ "ax.set_xlabel('Importance')\n",
284
+ "plt.tight_layout()\n",
285
+ "plt.show()"
286
+ ]},
287
+
288
+ {"cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [
289
+ "## Takeaways\n",
290
+ "\n",
291
+ "1. **Control architecture matters enormously:** Going from no gap control to\n",
292
+ " full PID SCF+GW control reduces process variability by 50\u201370%. This is\n",
293
+ " not optional in regulated pharma manufacturing.\n",
294
+ "\n",
295
+ "2. **Twin feed screws are a multiplicative advantage:** On top of PID control,\n",
296
+ " twin screws provide an additional 20\u201330% reduction in CV by smoothing\n",
297
+ " feed rate fluctuations. This is a mechanical design choice, not a tuning\n",
298
+ " parameter \u2014 it must be built into the machine.\n",
299
+ "\n",
300
+ "3. **Material properties affect control difficulty:** Brittle materials\n",
301
+ " produce noisier signals that challenge even the best PID controllers.\n",
302
+ " Process development must account for this.\n",
303
+ "\n",
304
+ "4. **SPC tools apply directly to continuous granulation:** Control charts,\n",
305
+ " Cp/Cpk, and trend analysis are standard pharma quality tools that\n",
306
+ " connect naturally to roll compaction process data.\n",
307
+ "\n",
308
+ "---\n",
309
+ "\n",
310
+ "For twin-feed-screw roller compactors with advanced PID control and direct\n",
311
+ "engineer support, see IPA\u2019s CL-series compactors:\n",
312
+ "**https://www.innovativeprocess.com**\n",
313
+ "\n",
314
+ "*Dataset \u00a9 2026 Innovative Process Applications, CC BY 4.0.* \n",
315
+ "*Scientific basis: Szappanos-Csord\u00e1s (2018), Chapter 3.1.*"
316
+ ]}
317
+ ],
318
+ "metadata": {
319
+ "colab": {
320
+ "provenance": [],
321
+ "toc_visible": true,
322
+ "authorship_tag": "Innovative Process Applications (IPA)"
323
+ },
324
+ "kernelspec": {"display_name": "Python 3", "language": "python", "name": "python3"},
325
+ "language_info": {"name": "python", "version": "3.11"}
326
+ },
327
+ "nbformat": 4,
328
+ "nbformat_minor": 5
329
+ }
LICENSE.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
2
+ ===========================================================
3
+
4
+ Copyright (c) 2026 Innovative Process Applications (IPA)
5
+
6
+ This dataset is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
7
+ International License. You are free to:
8
+
9
+ - Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
10
+ - Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material
11
+ for any purpose, even commercially.
12
+
13
+ Under the following terms:
14
+
15
+ - Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to
16
+ the license, and indicate if changes were made.
17
+
18
+ Recommended attribution:
19
+
20
+ "Roll Compactor Control Performance: PID Tuning & Process Stability
21
+ (Synthetic), v1.0, by Innovative Process Applications (IPA), CC BY 4.0,
22
+ https://www.innovativeprocess.com"
23
+
24
+ Full license text: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
25
+
26
+ DISCLAIMER: This dataset is synthetic and intended for educational use
27
+ only. It does not represent real equipment, customer, or production
28
+ data.
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,145 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: cc-by-4.0
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Roll Compactor Control Performance: PID Tuning & Process Stability (Synthetic)
2
+
3
+ **Version:** 1.0
4
+ **Publisher:** [Innovative Process Applications (IPA)](https://www.innovativeprocess.com)
5
+ **License:** Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
6
+ **Contact:** Crestwood, IL, USA
7
+
8
+ > **This dataset is 100% synthetic and intended for educational use only.**
9
+ > It was generated from PID control theory applied to roll compaction process
10
+ > dynamics — not measured on any real equipment, customer, or production batch.
11
+
12
+ ---
13
+
14
+ ## What's in this dataset
15
+
16
+ Two linked files containing synthetic roll compaction process control data:
17
+
18
+ ### 1. Summary file: `control_performance_summary_v1.0.csv` (96 runs × 22 columns)
19
+
20
+ Each row is one 3-minute compaction run with computed control metrics.
21
+
22
+ | Column | Description |
23
+ |---|---|
24
+ | `run_id` | Unique run identifier |
25
+ | `control_architecture` | Control strategy identifier |
26
+ | `control_label` | Human-readable control description |
27
+ | `feed_type` | Single screw or twin screw |
28
+ | `has_scf_pid` / `has_gw_pid` | Whether PID control is active for SCF / gap width |
29
+ | `material` | Model material (MCC_101, Mannitol_SD, MCC_Mannitol_Mix) |
30
+ | `scenario` | Setpoint change scenario (step up, step down, simultaneous, etc.) |
31
+ | `scf_setpoint_kN_per_cm` | Target specific compaction force |
32
+ | `gw_setpoint_mm` | Target gap width |
33
+ | `scf_ss_mean` / `scf_ss_std` / `scf_ss_cv_pct` | Steady-state SCF statistics |
34
+ | `scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct` | Steady-state deviation from target (%) |
35
+ | `scf_settling_time_s` | Time to reach ±2% of setpoint after change |
36
+ | `scf_overshoot_pct` | Peak overshoot above setpoint (%) |
37
+ | `gw_ss_mean_mm` / `gw_ss_std_mm` / `gw_ss_cv_pct` | Steady-state gap width statistics |
38
+ | `gw_deviation_from_setpoint_pct` | Gap width deviation from target (%) |
39
+ | `gw_settling_time_s` | Gap width settling time |
40
+ | `control_quality_grade` | Overall grade: Excellent / Good / Acceptable / Poor |
41
+
42
+ ### 2. Time-series file: `control_performance_timeseries_v1.0.csv` (8,640 rows × 8 columns)
43
+
44
+ Actual process data sampled every 2 seconds for each run (90 timepoints × 96 runs).
45
+
46
+ | Column | Description |
47
+ |---|---|
48
+ | `run_id` | Links to summary table |
49
+ | `time_s` | Timestamp in seconds (0–180) |
50
+ | `scf_setpoint_kN_per_cm` | Current SCF setpoint (changes at t=30s) |
51
+ | `scf_actual_kN_per_cm` | Measured SCF value |
52
+ | `gw_setpoint_mm` | Current gap width setpoint |
53
+ | `gw_actual_mm` | Measured gap width |
54
+ | `roll_speed_rpm` | Roll rotation speed |
55
+ | `screw_speed_rpm` | Feed screw speed (adapts if GW PID is active) |
56
+
57
+ ## Scientific basis
58
+
59
+ The dataset models PID control behavior as described in:
60
+
61
+ > Szappanos-Csordás, K. (2018). *Impact of material properties, process parameters
62
+ > and roll compactor design on roll compaction.* Chapter 3.1: Control performance
63
+ > of the different types of roll compactors. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
64
+
65
+ Key concepts from Section 3.1 modeled here:
66
+
67
+ 1. **Four control architectures** of increasing sophistication:
68
+ - No gap control (hydraulic pressure setpoint only) — highest variability
69
+ - PID with gap width + screw speed control — moderate performance
70
+ - PID with SCF + gap width control — good performance
71
+ - PID with SCF + gap width + twin feed screw — best performance
72
+
73
+ 2. **PID controller dynamics:** Proportional, Integral, and Derivative terms
74
+ producing characteristic overshoot, oscillation, and settling behavior.
75
+ Without PID (no gap control), the system shows steady-state offset because
76
+ there is no integral term to eliminate it.
77
+
78
+ 3. **Settling time:** Time required after a setpoint change for the process to
79
+ stabilize within ±2% of the new setpoint. Varies by control architecture,
80
+ material properties, and magnitude of the setpoint change.
81
+
82
+ 4. **Coefficient of variation (CV%):** Ratio of standard deviation to mean during
83
+ steady-state production. Lower CV indicates more robust process control.
84
+ The dissertation reports CV values from ~0.8% (best) to ~3.6% (no control).
85
+
86
+ 5. **Material-dependent control difficulty:** Brittle materials (mannitol)
87
+ produce more erratic force signals due to particle fragmentation, making
88
+ control harder. Plastic materials (MCC) compact more smoothly.
89
+
90
+ 6. **Twin feed screw advantage:** Reduces feed rate fluctuations, lowering both
91
+ SCF and gap width variability — a key differentiator in IPA's CL-series
92
+ compactor design.
93
+
94
+ 7. **Setpoint change scenarios:** Step increases, step decreases, and simultaneous
95
+ changes in SCF and gap width — mirroring the experimental protocol in the
96
+ dissertation's Tables 2–3.
97
+
98
+ ## What you can teach with it
99
+
100
+ - **PID controller tuning:** Examine overshoot, settling time, and steady-state
101
+ error across different control architectures
102
+ - **Statistical Process Control (SPC):** Build control charts, calculate Cp/Cpk,
103
+ identify out-of-control conditions
104
+ - **Time-series analysis:** Apply filtering, spectral analysis, or change-point
105
+ detection to the process signals
106
+ - **Control architecture comparison:** Quantify the value of closed-loop PID
107
+ control vs. open-loop hydraulic setpoint
108
+ - **Material effects on controllability:** Compare control performance across
109
+ plastic, brittle, and mixed deformation materials
110
+ - **Classification:** Train models to predict control quality grade from
111
+ time-series features
112
+
113
+ ## Cross-links (also published on)
114
+
115
+ - **Kaggle:** [link after publication]
116
+ - **Hugging Face Datasets:** [link after publication]
117
+ - **Zenodo (DOI):** [link after publication]
118
+ - **GitHub:** [link after publication]
119
+ - **IPA website:** https://www.innovativeprocess.com
120
+
121
+ ## About IPA
122
+
123
+ Innovative Process Applications designs and manufactures twin-feed-screw roller
124
+ compactors, mills, and size-reduction equipment for the pharmaceutical,
125
+ nutraceutical, chemical, and food industries. Based in Crestwood, Illinois, IPA
126
+ is a direct OEM alternative to legacy Fitzpatrick Chilsonator and FitzMill
127
+ systems, with American manufacturing and direct engineer access. Learn more at
128
+ [innovativeprocess.com](https://www.innovativeprocess.com).
129
+
130
+ ## Citation
131
+
132
+ > Innovative Process Applications (2026). *Roll Compactor Control Performance:
133
+ > PID Tuning & Process Stability (Synthetic), v1.0*. CC BY 4.0.
134
+ > https://www.innovativeprocess.com
135
+
136
+ Scientific basis:
137
+
138
+ > Szappanos-Csordás, K. (2018). *Impact of material properties, process
139
+ > parameters and roll compactor design on roll compaction.* Doctoral dissertation,
140
+ > Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
141
+
142
+ ## Version history
143
+
144
+ - **v1.0** (April 2026) — Initial release. 96 runs, 4 control architectures,
145
+ 3 materials, 8 scenarios. Summary + time-series files.
control_performance_summary_v1.0.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run_id,control_architecture,control_label,feed_type,has_scf_pid,has_gw_pid,material,scenario,scf_setpoint_kN_per_cm,gw_setpoint_mm,scf_ss_mean,scf_ss_std,scf_ss_cv_pct,scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct,scf_settling_time_s,scf_overshoot_pct,gw_ss_mean_mm,gw_ss_std_mm,gw_ss_cv_pct,gw_deviation_from_setpoint_pct,gw_settling_time_s,control_quality_grade
2
+ 1,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,3.994,0.0497,1.24,0.15,146.0,3.58,1.997,0.0604,3.02,0.15,149.5,Good
3
+ 2,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.89,0.0946,1.2,1.38,149.0,3.79,2.0066,0.055,2.74,0.33,149.5,Good
4
+ 3,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.113,0.0483,1.17,2.83,149.5,97.05,2.0084,0.0559,2.78,0.42,149.5,Good
5
+ 4,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.999,0.0753,1.26,0.02,143.5,10.08,1.555,0.0495,3.19,3.67,149.5,Good
6
+ 5,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.987,0.0671,1.12,0.22,132.0,2.72,2.9522,0.0775,2.63,1.59,149.5,Good
7
+ 6,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.892,0.0818,1.04,1.35,149.0,1.83,1.5551,0.0486,3.13,3.68,149.5,Good
8
+ 7,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,11.986,0.1092,0.91,0.12,139.5,2.61,1.985,0.059,2.97,0.75,149.5,Good
9
+ 8,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_101,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.005,0.0291,1.45,0.24,149.5,5.48,4.0112,0.0965,2.4,0.28,149.0,Good
10
+ 9,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,3.999,0.0822,2.06,0.03,149.0,6.75,2.0077,0.1016,5.06,0.38,149.5,Acceptable
11
+ 10,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.963,0.1551,1.95,0.47,149.5,10.38,2.0074,0.0985,4.9,0.37,149.5,Acceptable
12
+ 11,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.038,0.067,1.66,0.96,149.0,95.69,1.9962,0.0856,4.29,0.19,149.5,Acceptable
13
+ 12,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.998,0.0885,1.47,0.03,147.5,4.95,1.5485,0.0694,4.48,3.24,149.5,Acceptable
14
+ 13,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.99,0.1147,1.92,0.17,146.0,6.28,2.9679,0.1146,3.86,1.07,149.5,Acceptable
15
+ 14,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.958,0.1362,1.71,0.53,145.0,5.75,1.5549,0.0699,4.49,3.66,149.5,Acceptable
16
+ 15,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.011,0.2524,2.1,0.09,148.0,12.9,1.9973,0.0936,4.69,0.14,149.5,Acceptable
17
+ 16,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,Mannitol_SD,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.009,0.0389,1.94,0.44,149.0,8.81,3.9922,0.1647,4.12,0.2,149.5,Acceptable
18
+ 17,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.003,0.0803,2.01,0.08,149.5,8.22,1.9978,0.0736,3.68,0.11,149.5,Acceptable
19
+ 18,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.926,0.1102,1.39,0.93,144.5,2.77,1.9863,0.0649,3.27,0.68,149.5,Good
20
+ 19,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.07,0.0648,1.59,1.75,149.5,99.14,1.9986,0.0713,3.57,0.07,149.5,Acceptable
21
+ 20,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.996,0.1008,1.68,0.07,143.0,10.21,1.5455,0.0576,3.73,3.03,149.5,Acceptable
22
+ 21,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.978,0.0764,1.28,0.37,146.5,3.27,2.9614,0.1139,3.85,1.29,149.5,Acceptable
23
+ 22,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.901,0.1336,1.69,1.24,149.0,3.05,1.5449,0.0574,3.71,2.99,149.5,Acceptable
24
+ 23,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.026,0.1597,1.33,0.22,149.0,4.61,2.0055,0.0654,3.26,0.28,149.0,Good
25
+ 24,no_gap_control,No Gap Control (HP setpoint only),single_screw,False,False,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,1.997,0.0332,1.66,0.14,143.0,10.18,3.9867,0.138,3.46,0.33,149.5,Acceptable
26
+ 25,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,3.992,0.0618,1.55,0.21,149.5,5.64,1.9999,0.0356,1.78,0.0,148.5,Good
27
+ 26,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.895,0.1069,1.35,1.32,149.0,5.79,1.9982,0.0374,1.87,0.09,149.0,Good
28
+ 27,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.112,0.0459,1.12,2.8,149.5,98.81,2.0028,0.0359,1.79,0.14,149.5,Good
29
+ 28,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,6.002,0.0654,1.09,0.03,149.0,5.26,1.5002,0.0306,2.04,0.02,149.0,Good
30
+ 29,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.998,0.0777,1.3,0.03,137.5,7.74,2.9996,0.0454,1.51,0.01,149.5,Good
31
+ 30,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.886,0.1086,1.38,1.42,146.5,8.4,1.4992,0.0287,1.92,0.06,149.5,Good
32
+ 31,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.006,0.0983,0.82,0.05,144.0,7.93,1.9995,0.0429,2.15,0.02,147.0,Good
33
+ 32,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_101,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.003,0.0269,1.34,0.15,140.5,7.71,3.9926,0.0637,1.6,0.19,149.0,Good
34
+ 33,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.005,0.0807,2.02,0.11,149.5,5.3,1.9993,0.0569,2.85,0.04,149.5,Good
35
+ 34,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.953,0.1157,1.45,0.59,146.5,3.05,1.9983,0.0546,2.73,0.08,149.5,Good
36
+ 35,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.025,0.0622,1.55,0.63,148.5,94.53,2.0017,0.0523,2.61,0.09,149.5,Good
37
+ 36,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,6.004,0.095,1.58,0.07,145.0,8.27,1.5003,0.0446,2.97,0.02,148.5,Good
38
+ 37,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.988,0.0916,1.53,0.2,145.0,4.72,2.9974,0.0722,2.41,0.09,149.5,Good
39
+ 38,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.977,0.1247,1.56,0.28,149.5,4.49,1.4986,0.0408,2.72,0.09,149.5,Good
40
+ 39,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,11.999,0.1878,1.57,0.01,148.0,8.3,1.994,0.0527,2.64,0.3,148.0,Good
41
+ 40,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,Mannitol_SD,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.004,0.037,1.85,0.2,145.5,5.54,3.9993,0.0926,2.31,0.02,149.5,Good
42
+ 41,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.003,0.0482,1.2,0.09,147.5,6.47,1.997,0.0348,1.74,0.15,149.5,Good
43
+ 42,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.934,0.1004,1.27,0.82,149.0,7.9,1.9984,0.0431,2.15,0.08,149.5,Good
44
+ 43,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.083,0.0558,1.37,2.07,149.5,92.71,1.9968,0.0396,1.98,0.16,149.5,Good
45
+ 44,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,6.003,0.0694,1.16,0.05,145.5,3.76,1.4995,0.031,2.07,0.03,149.5,Good
46
+ 45,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.998,0.0878,1.46,0.04,146.5,5.53,3.0012,0.0508,1.69,0.04,148.0,Good
47
+ 46,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.908,0.0807,1.02,1.15,149.5,2.01,1.4992,0.0356,2.37,0.05,149.5,Good
48
+ 47,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.009,0.1385,1.15,0.08,144.5,5.57,2.0007,0.0387,1.93,0.03,148.5,Good
49
+ 48,pid_gw_screw,PID: GW + Screw Speed Control,single_screw,False,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.0,0.0364,1.82,0.02,149.5,7.5,4.0042,0.0695,1.74,0.11,147.5,Good
50
+ 49,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.003,0.027,0.68,0.08,52.5,2.02,2.0003,0.0271,1.36,0.02,149.5,Good
51
+ 50,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,8.007,0.0531,0.66,0.08,106.5,16.08,2.0016,0.0222,1.11,0.08,117.5,Excellent
52
+ 51,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,3.999,0.0304,0.76,0.01,126.0,98.14,1.9962,0.0215,1.08,0.19,147.0,Excellent
53
+ 52,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.999,0.0397,0.66,0.01,76.0,2.67,1.5009,0.024,1.6,0.06,142.5,Good
54
+ 53,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,6.001,0.0476,0.79,0.01,94.0,1.95,3.0015,0.029,0.97,0.05,149.5,Excellent
55
+ 54,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,8.009,0.0751,0.94,0.11,145.0,14.96,1.5023,0.0255,1.7,0.15,146.0,Good
56
+ 55,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.011,0.1131,0.94,0.1,135.0,5.9,1.999,0.0219,1.1,0.05,145.5,Good
57
+ 56,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_101,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,1.997,0.0215,1.08,0.16,139.0,2.96,4.0039,0.0343,0.86,0.1,104.0,Excellent
58
+ 57,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.0,0.0607,1.52,0.01,142.5,11.11,2.0054,0.0341,1.7,0.27,149.5,Good
59
+ 58,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.989,0.0965,1.21,0.14,147.5,13.23,2.002,0.0324,1.62,0.1,146.0,Good
60
+ 59,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.009,0.0716,1.79,0.24,149.5,102.15,2.0033,0.0466,2.33,0.16,149.5,Good
61
+ 60,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.988,0.071,1.19,0.2,149.5,5.25,1.5004,0.0254,1.7,0.02,148.0,Good
62
+ 61,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.993,0.0705,1.18,0.12,133.0,9.43,2.9953,0.0519,1.73,0.16,149.5,Good
63
+ 62,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.994,0.1043,1.3,0.08,144.0,20.06,1.4979,0.0242,1.62,0.14,148.0,Good
64
+ 63,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.002,0.1053,0.88,0.02,149.5,2.96,2.0031,0.0342,1.71,0.15,149.5,Good
65
+ 64,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.0,0.03,1.5,0.02,149.0,6.21,3.9986,0.0653,1.63,0.04,148.5,Good
66
+ 65,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,3.995,0.0353,0.88,0.14,124.5,4.49,2.0047,0.0293,1.46,0.23,148.5,Good
67
+ 66,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,8.005,0.0759,0.95,0.07,104.5,13.35,1.9977,0.033,1.65,0.12,149.5,Good
68
+ 67,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,3.999,0.0313,0.78,0.02,108.0,100.73,1.9999,0.0264,1.32,0.0,146.0,Good
69
+ 68,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,6.001,0.0537,0.9,0.01,113.0,4.93,1.5041,0.0247,1.64,0.27,147.0,Good
70
+ 69,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,6.005,0.0952,1.59,0.08,137.0,11.32,3.0029,0.0302,1.01,0.1,134.0,Good
71
+ 70,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.995,0.1195,1.49,0.06,143.0,16.1,1.4943,0.03,2.01,0.38,149.5,Good
72
+ 71,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.014,0.0862,0.72,0.12,145.5,2.69,2.0002,0.0354,1.77,0.01,145.5,Good
73
+ 72,pid_scf_gw,PID: SCF + GW Control,single_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.001,0.022,1.1,0.03,147.0,3.05,4.0008,0.0467,1.17,0.02,134.5,Good
74
+ 73,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.0,0.0442,1.11,0.01,129.0,7.8,1.9993,0.0185,0.92,0.03,148.5,Good
75
+ 74,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,7.997,0.0462,0.58,0.04,119.5,14.9,2.0013,0.0216,1.08,0.07,142.5,Excellent
76
+ 75,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,4.001,0.0198,0.49,0.03,147.0,99.67,1.9977,0.0194,0.97,0.12,136.5,Excellent
77
+ 76,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.999,0.0741,1.24,0.02,135.0,6.38,1.4983,0.0159,1.06,0.11,139.0,Good
78
+ 77,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,6.003,0.0349,0.58,0.06,133.0,7.11,3.0009,0.0216,0.72,0.03,75.5,Excellent
79
+ 78,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,8.001,0.0671,0.84,0.01,111.0,13.22,1.5027,0.0181,1.21,0.18,140.0,Good
80
+ 79,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,11.993,0.0562,0.47,0.06,130.0,4.7,2.0008,0.0198,0.99,0.04,146.0,Excellent
81
+ 80,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_101,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.001,0.0175,0.88,0.04,110.0,1.84,4.0012,0.0245,0.61,0.03,81.5,Excellent
82
+ 81,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.0,0.0397,0.99,0.01,142.0,8.26,2.0004,0.0253,1.26,0.02,149.0,Good
83
+ 82,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,8.006,0.0557,0.7,0.08,135.5,14.31,2.0017,0.0273,1.36,0.09,140.0,Good
84
+ 83,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,3.996,0.0391,0.98,0.11,124.0,101.31,2.002,0.0262,1.31,0.1,148.0,Good
85
+ 84,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,5.995,0.0484,0.81,0.09,146.0,2.11,1.4983,0.0215,1.44,0.12,149.5,Good
86
+ 85,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.997,0.0797,1.33,0.06,129.5,11.93,2.9966,0.0488,1.63,0.11,140.0,Good
87
+ 86,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,7.997,0.0403,0.5,0.04,117.5,13.8,1.4953,0.0262,1.75,0.31,149.0,Good
88
+ 87,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.01,0.1305,1.09,0.08,107.5,10.86,1.9999,0.028,1.4,0.0,144.5,Good
89
+ 88,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,Mannitol_SD,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.0,0.023,1.15,0.0,127.5,8.11,3.9944,0.0472,1.18,0.14,142.5,Good
90
+ 89,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,steady_state_baseline,4.0,2.0,4.004,0.0418,1.04,0.1,146.5,6.6,1.9998,0.0277,1.38,0.01,148.5,Good
91
+ 90,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_up,8.0,2.0,8.0,0.0394,0.49,0.0,103.0,15.47,1.9944,0.0228,1.14,0.28,149.0,Excellent
92
+ 91,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,scf_step_down,4.0,2.0,3.998,0.032,0.8,0.06,108.0,100.07,2.0,0.0204,1.02,0.0,132.0,Excellent
93
+ 92,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_down,6.0,1.5,6.004,0.0543,0.9,0.06,138.5,6.13,1.5019,0.0222,1.48,0.13,140.0,Good
94
+ 93,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,gw_step_up,6.0,3.0,5.996,0.0411,0.69,0.07,149.5,2.13,3.0013,0.0319,1.06,0.04,146.0,Excellent
95
+ 94,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,simultaneous_change,8.0,1.5,8.001,0.0346,0.43,0.02,83.0,13.12,1.5006,0.0203,1.35,0.04,149.5,Excellent
96
+ 95,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,high_force_steady,12.0,2.0,12.004,0.0938,0.78,0.03,139.5,5.61,1.9991,0.0188,0.94,0.04,111.5,Excellent
97
+ 96,pid_scf_gw_twin_screw,PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw,twin_screw,True,True,MCC_Mannitol_Mix,low_force_wide_gap,2.0,4.0,2.001,0.0168,0.84,0.03,145.5,2.01,3.997,0.0326,0.82,0.08,127.0,Excellent
control_performance_timeseries_v1.0.csv ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
generate_dataset.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ """
2
+ IPA Roll Compactor Control Performance Synthetic Dataset Generator v1.0
3
+ =======================================================================
4
+ Generates synthetic time-series process data simulating PID control behavior
5
+ of roll compactors during dry granulation, grounded in the control performance
6
+ concepts from:
7
+
8
+ Szappanos-Csordás, K. (2018). "Impact of material properties, process
9
+ parameters and roll compactor design on roll compaction." Chapter 3.1:
10
+ Control performance of the different types of roll compactors.
11
+
12
+ Key concepts modeled:
13
+ - PID controller behavior (P, I, D terms) for SCF and gap width control
14
+ - Settling time after setpoint changes (material- and design-dependent)
15
+ - Steady-state deviation from setpoint (mean ± SD, CV%)
16
+ - Control architecture differences:
17
+ * No gap control (AlexanderWerk BT120-type): high GW variability
18
+ * PID with GW + screw speed control (Hosokawa-type): moderate control
19
+ * PID with SCF + GW control (Bohle/Gerteis-type): best control
20
+ - Material-dependent control difficulty: MCC (plastic, compressible) is
21
+ easier to control than mannitol (brittle, less compressible)
22
+ - Overshoot, oscillation, and disturbance rejection behavior
23
+ - Twin feed screw advantage: reduced feed fluctuation → lower SCF variance
24
+
25
+ THIS IS SYNTHETIC EDUCATIONAL DATA. NOT REAL CUSTOMER OR LAB DATA.
26
+ Generated by Innovative Process Applications (IPA) for teaching process
27
+ control, PID tuning, and SPC concepts.
28
+ """
29
+
30
+ import numpy as np
31
+ import pandas as pd
32
+
33
+ rng = np.random.default_rng(seed=2026)
34
+
35
+ # =============================================================================
36
+ # CONTROL ARCHITECTURES (from Chapter 3.1 / Table 1 of the dissertation)
37
+ # =============================================================================
38
+ CONTROL_CONFIGS = {
39
+ "no_gap_control": {
40
+ "label": "No Gap Control (HP setpoint only)",
41
+ "description": "Hydraulic pressure setpoint, no closed-loop gap control",
42
+ "has_scf_pid": False,
43
+ "has_gw_pid": False,
44
+ "scf_settling_base_s": 15.0,
45
+ "gw_settling_base_s": 50.0, # gap drifts until material equilibrates
46
+ "scf_noise_base": 0.012, # CV fraction — higher without PID
47
+ "gw_noise_base": 0.030, # high GW variability (3% CV from Table 2)
48
+ "overshoot_factor": 0.08,
49
+ "feed_type": "single_screw",
50
+ },
51
+ "pid_gw_screw": {
52
+ "label": "PID: GW + Screw Speed Control",
53
+ "description": "Gap width controlled via PID adjusting screw speed",
54
+ "has_scf_pid": False,
55
+ "has_gw_pid": True,
56
+ "scf_settling_base_s": 12.0,
57
+ "gw_settling_base_s": 20.0,
58
+ "scf_noise_base": 0.010,
59
+ "gw_noise_base": 0.015,
60
+ "overshoot_factor": 0.12, # GW PID can overshoot on fast changes
61
+ "feed_type": "single_screw",
62
+ },
63
+ "pid_scf_gw": {
64
+ "label": "PID: SCF + GW Control",
65
+ "description": "Both SCF and GW controlled via independent PID loops",
66
+ "has_scf_pid": True,
67
+ "has_gw_pid": True,
68
+ "scf_settling_base_s": 8.0,
69
+ "gw_settling_base_s": 10.0,
70
+ "scf_noise_base": 0.006, # best control performance
71
+ "gw_noise_base": 0.008,
72
+ "overshoot_factor": 0.05,
73
+ "feed_type": "single_screw",
74
+ },
75
+ "pid_scf_gw_twin_screw": {
76
+ "label": "PID: SCF + GW Control + Twin Feed Screw",
77
+ "description": "Dual PID loops with twin feed screw for uniform feeding",
78
+ "has_scf_pid": True,
79
+ "has_gw_pid": True,
80
+ "scf_settling_base_s": 6.0,
81
+ "gw_settling_base_s": 8.0,
82
+ "scf_noise_base": 0.004, # twin screw reduces feed fluctuation
83
+ "gw_noise_base": 0.006,
84
+ "overshoot_factor": 0.04,
85
+ "feed_type": "twin_screw",
86
+ },
87
+ }
88
+
89
+ # =============================================================================
90
+ # MATERIALS (control difficulty varies with deformation behavior)
91
+ # =============================================================================
92
+ MATERIALS = {
93
+ "MCC_101": {
94
+ "label": "MCC 101 (Plastic)",
95
+ "control_difficulty": 0.8, # easier — plastic deformation is smoother
96
+ "settling_multiplier": 0.9,
97
+ "disturbance_sensitivity": 0.7,
98
+ },
99
+ "Mannitol_SD": {
100
+ "label": "Mannitol (Brittle)",
101
+ "control_difficulty": 1.3, # harder — brittle fragmentation causes spikes
102
+ "settling_multiplier": 1.3,
103
+ "disturbance_sensitivity": 1.4,
104
+ },
105
+ "MCC_Mannitol_Mix": {
106
+ "label": "1:1 Mixture",
107
+ "control_difficulty": 1.0,
108
+ "settling_multiplier": 1.0,
109
+ "disturbance_sensitivity": 1.0,
110
+ },
111
+ }
112
+
113
+ # =============================================================================
114
+ # SETPOINT CHANGE SCENARIOS (from Table 2/3 patterns in the dissertation)
115
+ # =============================================================================
116
+ SCENARIOS = [
117
+ {"scf_from": 4.0, "scf_to": 4.0, "gw_from": 2.0, "gw_to": 2.0,
118
+ "label": "steady_state_baseline"},
119
+ {"scf_from": 4.0, "scf_to": 8.0, "gw_from": 2.0, "gw_to": 2.0,
120
+ "label": "scf_step_up"},
121
+ {"scf_from": 8.0, "scf_to": 4.0, "gw_from": 2.0, "gw_to": 2.0,
122
+ "label": "scf_step_down"},
123
+ {"scf_from": 6.0, "scf_to": 6.0, "gw_from": 3.0, "gw_to": 1.5,
124
+ "label": "gw_step_down"},
125
+ {"scf_from": 6.0, "scf_to": 6.0, "gw_from": 1.5, "gw_to": 3.0,
126
+ "label": "gw_step_up"},
127
+ {"scf_from": 4.0, "scf_to": 8.0, "gw_from": 3.0, "gw_to": 1.5,
128
+ "label": "simultaneous_change"},
129
+ {"scf_from": 12.0, "scf_to": 12.0, "gw_from": 2.0, "gw_to": 2.0,
130
+ "label": "high_force_steady"},
131
+ {"scf_from": 2.0, "scf_to": 2.0, "gw_from": 4.0, "gw_to": 4.0,
132
+ "label": "low_force_wide_gap"},
133
+ ]
134
+
135
+ # =============================================================================
136
+ # TIME-SERIES GENERATION
137
+ # =============================================================================
138
+ SAMPLE_RATE_HZ = 2.0 # 2 samples/second (0.5s intervals)
139
+ RUN_DURATION_S = 180.0 # 3-minute runs — enough to see settling + steady state
140
+ SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S = 30.0 # setpoint changes at t=30s
141
+
142
+ def pid_response(t, setpoint_from, setpoint_to, change_time,
143
+ settling_time, overshoot_factor, noise_cv,
144
+ has_pid, disturbance_sensitivity, rng_local):
145
+ """
146
+ Simulate PID controller response to a setpoint change.
147
+
148
+ Without PID: parameter drifts slowly toward equilibrium with high noise.
149
+ With PID: second-order underdamped response (overshoot + settling).
150
+ """
151
+ n = len(t)
152
+ values = np.zeros(n)
153
+ step_size = setpoint_to - setpoint_from
154
+
155
+ for i, ti in enumerate(t):
156
+ if ti < change_time:
157
+ # Pre-change: at old setpoint with noise
158
+ base = setpoint_from
159
+ else:
160
+ elapsed = ti - change_time
161
+ if has_pid and abs(step_size) > 0.01:
162
+ # Underdamped PID: exponential decay with overshoot
163
+ tau = settling_time / 4.0 # time constant
164
+ zeta = 0.4 + rng_local.uniform(-0.05, 0.05) # damping ratio
165
+ omega_n = 1.0 / tau
166
+ omega_d = omega_n * np.sqrt(1 - zeta**2) if zeta < 1 else omega_n
167
+ decay = np.exp(-zeta * omega_n * elapsed)
168
+ oscillation = np.cos(omega_d * elapsed)
169
+ overshoot_amp = overshoot_factor * abs(step_size)
170
+ response = 1.0 - decay * (oscillation + (zeta/np.sqrt(1-zeta**2)) *
171
+ np.sin(omega_d * elapsed)) if zeta < 1 else \
172
+ 1.0 - (1 + omega_n * elapsed) * np.exp(-omega_n * elapsed)
173
+ response = np.clip(response, -0.5, 1.5)
174
+ base = setpoint_from + step_size * response
175
+ elif not has_pid and abs(step_size) > 0.01:
176
+ # No PID: slow exponential approach, never quite gets there
177
+ tau = settling_time / 2.0
178
+ response = 1.0 - np.exp(-elapsed / tau)
179
+ # Steady-state offset (no integral term to eliminate it)
180
+ offset = 0.03 * step_size * disturbance_sensitivity
181
+ base = setpoint_from + step_size * response * 0.95 + offset
182
+ else:
183
+ base = setpoint_to
184
+
185
+ # Process noise (proportional to setpoint magnitude)
186
+ noise = rng_local.normal(0, noise_cv * abs(base) + 0.01)
187
+
188
+ # Occasional disturbances (feed fluctuations, powder bridging)
189
+ if rng_local.random() < 0.02 * disturbance_sensitivity:
190
+ noise += rng_local.normal(0, 0.05 * abs(base))
191
+
192
+ values[i] = base + noise
193
+
194
+ return values
195
+
196
+ def compute_run_metrics(t, scf_actual, gw_actual, scf_setpoint, gw_setpoint,
197
+ change_time):
198
+ """Compute the control performance metrics from Chapter 3.1."""
199
+ # Steady-state region: last 60 seconds of the run
200
+ ss_mask = t >= (t[-1] - 60.0)
201
+ # Settling region: after change, before steady state
202
+ settling_mask = (t >= change_time) & (t < change_time + 90.0)
203
+
204
+ # SCF metrics
205
+ scf_ss = scf_actual[ss_mask]
206
+ scf_mean = np.mean(scf_ss)
207
+ scf_std = np.std(scf_ss)
208
+ scf_cv = (scf_std / abs(scf_mean) * 100) if abs(scf_mean) > 0.1 else 0.0
209
+ scf_deviation_pct = abs(scf_mean - scf_setpoint) / scf_setpoint * 100 \
210
+ if scf_setpoint > 0.1 else 0.0
211
+
212
+ # GW metrics
213
+ gw_ss = gw_actual[ss_mask]
214
+ gw_mean = np.mean(gw_ss)
215
+ gw_std = np.std(gw_ss)
216
+ gw_cv = (gw_std / abs(gw_mean) * 100) if abs(gw_mean) > 0.1 else 0.0
217
+ gw_deviation_pct = abs(gw_mean - gw_setpoint) / gw_setpoint * 100 \
218
+ if gw_setpoint > 0.1 else 0.0
219
+
220
+ # Settling time: time after change until value stays within ±2% of final
221
+ scf_settled_s = _find_settling_time(t, scf_actual, scf_setpoint,
222
+ change_time, tolerance=0.02)
223
+ gw_settled_s = _find_settling_time(t, gw_actual, gw_setpoint,
224
+ change_time, tolerance=0.02)
225
+
226
+ # Overshoot
227
+ post_change = scf_actual[t >= change_time]
228
+ if len(post_change) > 0 and scf_setpoint > 0.1:
229
+ scf_overshoot_pct = (max(post_change) - scf_setpoint) / scf_setpoint * 100
230
+ else:
231
+ scf_overshoot_pct = 0.0
232
+
233
+ return {
234
+ "scf_ss_mean": round(scf_mean, 3),
235
+ "scf_ss_std": round(scf_std, 4),
236
+ "scf_ss_cv_pct": round(scf_cv, 2),
237
+ "scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct": round(scf_deviation_pct, 2),
238
+ "scf_settling_time_s": round(scf_settled_s, 1),
239
+ "scf_overshoot_pct": round(max(scf_overshoot_pct, 0), 2),
240
+ "gw_ss_mean_mm": round(gw_mean, 4),
241
+ "gw_ss_std_mm": round(gw_std, 4),
242
+ "gw_ss_cv_pct": round(gw_cv, 2),
243
+ "gw_deviation_from_setpoint_pct": round(gw_deviation_pct, 2),
244
+ "gw_settling_time_s": round(gw_settled_s, 1),
245
+ }
246
+
247
+ def _find_settling_time(t, values, setpoint, change_time, tolerance=0.02):
248
+ """Find time after change when value stays within tolerance band."""
249
+ if abs(setpoint) < 0.1:
250
+ return 0.0
251
+ band = tolerance * abs(setpoint)
252
+ post_mask = t >= change_time
253
+ post_t = t[post_mask]
254
+ post_v = values[post_mask]
255
+ # Walk backwards from end to find last excursion outside band
256
+ for i in range(len(post_v) - 1, -1, -1):
257
+ if abs(post_v[i] - setpoint) > band:
258
+ if i < len(post_v) - 1:
259
+ return post_t[i+1] - change_time
260
+ else:
261
+ return post_t[-1] - change_time
262
+ return 0.0 # already settled
263
+
264
+ # =============================================================================
265
+ # GENERATE ALL RUNS
266
+ # =============================================================================
267
+ t = np.arange(0, RUN_DURATION_S, 1.0 / SAMPLE_RATE_HZ)
268
+ n_samples = len(t)
269
+
270
+ summary_rows = []
271
+ timeseries_rows = []
272
+ run_id = 0
273
+
274
+ for ctrl_key, ctrl in CONTROL_CONFIGS.items():
275
+ for mat_key, mat in MATERIALS.items():
276
+ for scenario in SCENARIOS:
277
+ run_id += 1
278
+
279
+ # Adjusted settling times and noise for material
280
+ scf_settling = (ctrl["scf_settling_base_s"] *
281
+ mat["settling_multiplier"])
282
+ gw_settling = (ctrl["gw_settling_base_s"] *
283
+ mat["settling_multiplier"])
284
+ scf_noise = ctrl["scf_noise_base"] * mat["control_difficulty"]
285
+ gw_noise = ctrl["gw_noise_base"] * mat["control_difficulty"]
286
+
287
+ # Twin screw reduces feed fluctuation → lower noise
288
+ if ctrl["feed_type"] == "twin_screw":
289
+ scf_noise *= 0.75
290
+ gw_noise *= 0.80
291
+
292
+ # Generate time series
293
+ scf_actual = pid_response(
294
+ t, scenario["scf_from"], scenario["scf_to"],
295
+ SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S, scf_settling,
296
+ ctrl["overshoot_factor"], scf_noise,
297
+ ctrl["has_scf_pid"], mat["disturbance_sensitivity"], rng
298
+ )
299
+ gw_actual = pid_response(
300
+ t, scenario["gw_from"], scenario["gw_to"],
301
+ SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S, gw_settling,
302
+ ctrl["overshoot_factor"] * 0.7, gw_noise,
303
+ ctrl["has_gw_pid"], mat["disturbance_sensitivity"], rng
304
+ )
305
+
306
+ # Clip to physical limits
307
+ scf_actual = np.clip(scf_actual, 0.5, 25.0)
308
+ gw_actual = np.clip(gw_actual, 0.5, 8.0)
309
+
310
+ # Roll speed: constant within a run (not PID-controlled here)
311
+ rs_setpoint = 3.0 + rng.uniform(-1, 1)
312
+ rs_actual = rs_setpoint + rng.normal(0, 0.02 * rs_setpoint, n_samples)
313
+
314
+ # Screw speed: varies if GW PID adjusts it
315
+ ss_base = 30.0 + rng.uniform(-5, 5)
316
+ if ctrl["has_gw_pid"]:
317
+ # Screw speed adapts inversely to gap error
318
+ gw_error = scenario["gw_to"] - gw_actual
319
+ ss_actual = ss_base + 5.0 * gw_error + rng.normal(0, 0.5, n_samples)
320
+ else:
321
+ ss_actual = ss_base + rng.normal(0, 0.3, n_samples)
322
+
323
+ # Store time-series (subsample to every 2s for manageable file size)
324
+ subsample = np.arange(0, n_samples, 4) # every 2 seconds
325
+ for idx in subsample:
326
+ timeseries_rows.append({
327
+ "run_id": run_id,
328
+ "time_s": round(t[idx], 1),
329
+ "scf_setpoint_kN_per_cm": scenario["scf_to"] if t[idx] >= SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S else scenario["scf_from"],
330
+ "scf_actual_kN_per_cm": round(scf_actual[idx], 3),
331
+ "gw_setpoint_mm": scenario["gw_to"] if t[idx] >= SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S else scenario["gw_from"],
332
+ "gw_actual_mm": round(gw_actual[idx], 4),
333
+ "roll_speed_rpm": round(rs_actual[idx], 2),
334
+ "screw_speed_rpm": round(ss_actual[idx], 1),
335
+ })
336
+
337
+ # Compute summary metrics
338
+ metrics = compute_run_metrics(
339
+ t, scf_actual, gw_actual,
340
+ scenario["scf_to"], scenario["gw_to"],
341
+ SETPOINT_CHANGE_AT_S
342
+ )
343
+
344
+ # Classify control quality
345
+ total_cv = metrics["scf_ss_cv_pct"] + metrics["gw_ss_cv_pct"]
346
+ if total_cv < 2.0 and metrics["scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct"] < 1.0:
347
+ control_quality = "Excellent"
348
+ elif total_cv < 5.0 and metrics["scf_deviation_from_setpoint_pct"] < 3.0:
349
+ control_quality = "Good"
350
+ elif total_cv < 10.0:
351
+ control_quality = "Acceptable"
352
+ else:
353
+ control_quality = "Poor"
354
+
355
+ summary_rows.append({
356
+ "run_id": run_id,
357
+ "control_architecture": ctrl_key,
358
+ "control_label": ctrl["label"],
359
+ "feed_type": ctrl["feed_type"],
360
+ "has_scf_pid": ctrl["has_scf_pid"],
361
+ "has_gw_pid": ctrl["has_gw_pid"],
362
+ "material": mat_key,
363
+ "scenario": scenario["label"],
364
+ "scf_setpoint_kN_per_cm": scenario["scf_to"],
365
+ "gw_setpoint_mm": scenario["gw_to"],
366
+ **metrics,
367
+ "control_quality_grade": control_quality,
368
+ })
369
+
370
+ # =============================================================================
371
+ # SAVE
372
+ # =============================================================================
373
+ df_summary = pd.DataFrame(summary_rows)
374
+ df_timeseries = pd.DataFrame(timeseries_rows)
375
+
376
+ df_summary.to_csv("control_performance_summary_v1.0.csv", index=False)
377
+ df_timeseries.to_csv("control_performance_timeseries_v1.0.csv", index=False)
378
+
379
+ print(f"Summary: {len(df_summary)} runs, {len(df_summary.columns)} columns")
380
+ print(f"Time series: {len(df_timeseries)} rows, {len(df_timeseries.columns)} columns")
381
+ print()
382
+ print("=== Control quality distribution ===")
383
+ print(df_summary["control_quality_grade"].value_counts())
384
+ print()
385
+ print("=== Mean SCF CV% by architecture ===")
386
+ print(df_summary.groupby("control_architecture")["scf_ss_cv_pct"].mean().round(2))
387
+ print()
388
+ print("=== Mean GW CV% by architecture ===")
389
+ print(df_summary.groupby("control_architecture")["gw_ss_cv_pct"].mean().round(2))
390
+ print()
391
+ print("=== Mean SCF settling time by architecture ===")
392
+ print(df_summary.groupby("control_architecture")["scf_settling_time_s"].mean().round(1))