Gingiris commited on
Commit
dda45ff
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 09e1c32

add field notes from founder interviews: interview quality test and benchmarks

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +40 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -125,6 +125,46 @@ Real framework from $50M+ ARR exits — not vague "talk to users".
125
 
126
  ---
127
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
128
  ## 🤝 Work With Iris
129
 
130
  Need 1-on-1 PMF strategy or founder-led interview coaching? Reach out via [Telegram @Iris_carrot](https://t.me/Iris_carrot) or visit [gingiris.tools](https://gingiris.tools).
 
125
 
126
  ---
127
 
128
+ ## 🆕 What's New (July 2026): Field Notes from Founder Interviews
129
+
130
+ Fresh observations distilled from our founder podcast series. They sharpen — not replace — the protocols above.
131
+
132
+ ### The One-Line Test for Interview Quality
133
+
134
+ A useless interview looks like an investor pitch: you talk 80% of the time and the user quietly zones out. A good interview looks like a walkthrough: the user shares their screen and drives, showing you their real use cases step by step.
135
+
136
+ The uncomfortable constant behind this test — the user journey you imagined and the journey users actually take are almost never the same. Screen sharing is how you find the gap; talking at users is how you hide it.
137
+
138
+ ### "Willing to Pay" Is Not Paying
139
+
140
+ Saying "I'd pay for this" in an interview and actually entering a card number run on two different logics. Interview answers are social; payments are economic. Treat stated willingness as a hypothesis, then validate it with real payment behavior — a paywall, a pre-order, a paid pilot — before you count it as demand.
141
+
142
+ ### Benchmark Anchors (Reported)
143
+
144
+ - Gamma, HeyGen, and Lovable reportedly ran on the order of 500–1,000 user interviews within roughly their first 6 months — before scaling spend.
145
+ - The counter-example burn path: skipping that phase and buying growth instead, at tens of dollars per signup and hundreds of dollars per paying user, with no compounding insight to show for it.
146
+
147
+ The order matters: interviews first, scale second.
148
+
149
+ ### The Feedback Loop That Drives Retention
150
+
151
+ One pattern kept recurring among teams with strong retention:
152
+
153
+ 1. A deep user writes a 2,000-word review with screenshots.
154
+ 2. The whole team breaks it down together, issue by issue.
155
+ 3. Every issue gets fixed within 1–2 months.
156
+ 4. Someone goes back and tells the user: "your issue is fixed."
157
+
158
+ Step 4 is the one most teams skip — and it is the step that closes the loop and drives retention. Feedback that visibly changes the product turns reviewers into advocates.
159
+
160
+ ### Trust Benchmark (Self-Reported)
161
+
162
+ One founder's report: daily frontline chats with users built more trust in 2 months than colleagues had accumulated in over a year. Trust with users compounds at the speed of contact, not tenure.
163
+
164
+ *Distilled from 12 founder podcast interviews (2024–2026); figures are self-reported or reported.*
165
+
166
+ ---
167
+
168
  ## 🤝 Work With Iris
169
 
170
  Need 1-on-1 PMF strategy or founder-led interview coaching? Reach out via [Telegram @Iris_carrot](https://t.me/Iris_carrot) or visit [gingiris.tools](https://gingiris.tools).