| ==Phrack Inc.== |
|
|
| Volume One, Issue Five, Phile #7 of 12 |
|
|
| Jester Sluggo presents |
| an insight on |
| Wide-Area Networks |
| Part 1 |
|
|
| Part 1 contains information on ARPANET and CSNET. |
| Part 2 contains information on BITNET, MFENET, UUCP and USENET. |
| It is best if you read both files to better understand each other. |
|
|
| These files will cover general information on wide-area networks, (I.E. |
| ARPANET, CSNET, BITNET, MFENET, UUCP and USENET), but may contain information |
| in relationship with other networks not emphasized in these files. These files |
| are NOT a hacker's tutorial/guide on these systems. |
|
|
| ARPANET |
| ~~~~~~~ |
| ARPANET. The ARPANET, which is a major component of the NSFnet [National |
| Science Foundation Network], began in 1969 as an R&D project managed by DARPA |
| [Dept. of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency]. ARPANET was an experiment |
| in resource sharing, and provided survivable (multiply connected), high |
| bandwidth (56 Kilobits per second) communications links between major existing |
| computational resources and computer users in academic, industrial, and |
| government research laboratories. ARPANET is managed and funded by by the DCA |
| [Defense Communications Agency] with user services provided by a network |
| information center at SRI International. |
| ARPANET served as a test for the development of advanced network protocols |
| including the TCP-IP protocol suite introduced in 1981. TCP-IP and |
| particularly IP, the internet protocol, introduced the idea of inter- |
| networking -- allowing networks of different technologies and connection |
| protocols to be linked together while providing a unified internetwork |
| addressing scheme and a common set of transport of application protocols. This |
| development allowed networks of computers and workstations to be connected to |
| the ARPANET, rather than just single-host computers. TCP-IP remain the most |
| available and advanced, non-vendor-specific, networking protocols and have |
| strongly influenced the current international standards of activity. TCP-IP |
| provide a variety of application services, including remote logon (Telnet), |
| file transfer (FTP), and electronic mail (SMTP and RFC822). |
| ARPANET technology was so successful that in 1982, the Dept. of Defense |
| (DOD) abandoned their AUTODIN II network project and adopted ARPANET technology |
| for the Dept. of Defense Data Network (DDN). The current MILNET, which was |
| split form the original ARPANET in 1983, is the operational, unclassified |
| network component of the DDN, while ARPANET remains an advanced network R&D |
| tested for DARPA. In practice, ARPANET has also been an operational network |
| supporting DOD, DOE [Dept. of Energy], and some NSF-sponsored computer science |
| researchers. This community has come to depend on the availability of the |
| network. Until the advent of NSFnet, access to ARPANET was restricted to this |
| community. |
| As an operational network in the scientific and engineering research |
| community, and with the increasing availability of affordable super- |
| minicomputers, ARPANET was used less as a tool for sharing remote computational |
| resources than it was for sharing information. The major lesson from the |
| ARPANET experience is that information sharing is a key benefit of computer |
| networking. Indeed it may be argued that many major advances in computer |
| systems and artificial intelligence are the direct result of the enhanced |
| collaboration made possible by ARPANET. |
| However, ARPANET also had the negative effect of creating a have--have not |
| situation in experimental computer research. Scientists and engineers carrying |
| out such research at institutions other than the twenty or so ARPANET sites |
| were at a clear disadvantage in accessing pertinent technical information and |
| in attracting faculty and students. |
| In October 1985, NSF and DARPA, with DOD support, signed a memorandum of |
| agreement to expand the ARPANET to allow NSF supercomputer users to use ARPANET |
| to access the NSF supercomputer centers and to communicate with each other. |
| The immediate effect of this agreement was to allow all NSF supercomputer users |
| on campuses with an existing ARPANET connection to use ARPANET. In addition, |
| the NSF supercomputer resource centers at the University of Illinois and |
| Cornell University are connected to ARPANET. In general, the existing ARPANET |
| connections are in departments of computer science or electrical engineering |
| and are not readily accessible by other researchers. However, DARPA has |
| requested that the campus ARPANET coordinators facilitate access by relevant |
| NSF researchers. |
| As part of the NSFnet initiative, a number of universities have requested |
| connection to ARPANET. Each of these campuses has undertaken to establish a |
| campus network gateway accessible to all due course, be able to use the ARPANET |
| to access the NSF supercomputer centers, from within their own local computing |
| environment. Additional requests for connection to the ARPANET are being |
| considered by NSF. |
|
|
| CSNET |
| ~~~~~ |
| CSNET. Establishment of a network for computer science research was first |
| suggested in 1974, by the NSF advisory committee for computer science. The |
| objective of the network would be to support collaboration among researchers, |
| provide research sharing, and, in particular, support isolated researchers in |
| the smaller universities. |
| In the spring of 1980, CSNET [Computer Science Network], was defined and |
| proposed to NSF as a logical network made up of several physical networks of |
| various power, performance, and cost. NSF responded with a five year contract |
| for development of the network under the condition that CSNET was to be |
| financially self-supporting by 1986. Initially CSNET was a network with five |
| major components -- ARPANET, Phonenet (a telephone based message relaying |
| service), X25Net (suppose for the TCP-IP Protocol suite over X.25-based public |
| data networks), a public host (a centralized mail service), and a name server |
| (an online database of CSNET users to support transparent mail services). The |
| common service provided across all these networks is electronic mail, which is |
| integrated at a special service host, which acts as an electronic mail relay |
| between the component networks. Thus CSNET users can send electronic mail to |
| all ARPANET users and vice-versa. CSNET, with DARPA support, installed |
| ARPANET connections at the CSNET development sites at the universities of |
| Delaware and Wisconsin and Purdue University. |
| In 1981, Bolt, Beranek, and Newman (BBN) contracted to provide technical |
| and user services and to operate the CSNET Coordination and Information Center. |
| In 1983, general management of CSNET was assumed by UCAR [the Univ. Corporation |
| for Atmospheric Research], with a subcontract to BBN. Since then, CSNET has |
| grown rapidly and is currently an independent, financially stable, and |
| professionally managed service to the computer research community. However, |
| the momentum created by CSNET's initial success caused the broad community |
| support it now enjoys. More than 165 university, industrial, and government |
| computer research groups now belong to CSNET. |
| A number of lessons may be learned from the CSNET experience. |
| 1) The network is now financially self-sufficient, showing that a research is |
| willing to pay for the benefits of a networking service. (Users pay usage |
| charges plus membership fees ranging from $2000 for small computer science |
| departments to $30,000 for the larger industrial members.) |
| 2) While considerable benefits are available to researchers from simple |
| electronic mail and mailing list services -- the Phonenet service -- most |
| researchers want the much higher level of performance and service provided by |
| the ARPANET. |
| 3) Providing a customer support and information service is crucial to the |
| success of a network, even (or perhaps especially) when the users are |
| themselves sophisticated computer science professionals. Lessons from the |
| CSNET experience will provide valuable input to the design, implementation, |
| provision of user services, and operation and management of NSFnet, and, in |
| particular, to the development of the appropriate funding model for NSFnet. |
| CSNET, with support from the NSFnet program, is now developing the CYPRESS |
| project which is examining ways in which the level of CSNET service may be |
| improved, at low cost, to research departments. CYPRESS will use the DARPA |
| protocol suite and provide ARPANET-like service on low-speed 9600-bit-per- |
| second leased line telephone links. The network will use a nearest neighbor |
| topology, modeled on BITNET, while providing a higher level of service to users |
| and a higher level of interoperability with the ARPANET. The CYPRESS project is |
| designed to replace or supplement CSNET use of the X.25 public networks, which |
| has proved excessively expensive. This approach may also be used to provide a |
| low-cost connection to NSFnet for smaller campuses. |
|
|
| / |
| \ |
| / luggo !! |
|
|
| Please give full credit for references to the following: |
| Dennis M. Jennings, Lawrence H. Landweber, Ira H. Fuchs, David J. Faber, and W. |
| Richards Adrion. |
|
|
| Any questions, comments or Sluggestions can be emailed to me at Metal Shop, |
| or sent via snailmail to the following address until 12-31-1986: |
|
|
| J. Sluggo |
| P.O. Box 93 |
| East Grand Forks, MN 56721 |
|
|
|
|