| ==Phrack Magazine== |
|
|
| Volume Four, Issue Forty-Four, File 10 of 27 |
|
|
| **************************************************************************** |
|
|
| [Editor's Note: This file is reprinted with permission of InterPact |
| Press. The actual document contains many pictures, charts, and tables |
| that due to our format, we were unable to reproduce. We encourage the |
| reader to contact InterPact Press at 813-393-6600 and order a hard copy |
| of the document for $25.00] |
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| Protective Measures Against Compromising Electro Magnetic Radiation |
| Emitted by Video Display Terminals |
|
|
| by Professor Erhart Moller |
| University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany |
|
|
|
|
| 0. Introduction |
|
|
| Compromising electromagnetic radiation emitted by machinery or |
| instruments used in data processing or communication engineering can be |
| received, decoded and recorded even across large distances. It is also |
| possible to recognize the data or information which was processed and |
| transmitted by the emitting instrument as text in clear. Compromising |
| emitted electromagnetic radiation thus jeopardizes the protection and |
| security of data. |
|
|
| The Laboratory for Communication Engineering at the Fachhochschule |
| Aachen is developing protective measures against compromising emission |
| of radiation. However, these protective measures can only be effective |
| if they are derived from the characteristics, the effects, and risks of |
| compromising emitted electromagnetic radiation. Therefore we first |
| consider only the forms of appearance and the characteristics of |
| compromising emitted electromagnetic radiation. |
|
|
| 1. Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation |
|
|
| In this context one often refers only to the so-called computer |
| radiation. But this is only one form of compromising emitted |
| electromagnetic radiation. There are three types of such emissions. |
|
|
| 1.1. Types of Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation |
|
|
| Figure 1.1 shows an n example of an arbitrary electric device with various |
| electric connections: a power supply line, a high frequency coaxial |
| transmission line, and a coolant line with in- and outflux. This device |
| emits three types of compromising electromagnetic radiation: |
|
|
| 1. electromagnetic radiation in form of electric and magnetic fields |
| and electromagnetic waves; |
|
|
| 2. electromagnetic waves on the outer surface of all coaxial metallic |
| connections (shell waves); |
|
|
| 3. electric interference currents and interference voltages in power |
| lines connected to the device. |
|
|
| Each of the three types can be transformed into the other two. For |
| instance, shell waves can be emitted as fields or waves. On the other |
| hand, electromagnetic waves can be caught by a nearby conductor and can |
| propagate on it as shell waves. These phenomena are the reason for the |
| difficult control of compromising electromagnetic radiation, and they |
| imply that one must deal with all and not just one form of compromising |
| electromagnetic radiation. Also, electromagnetic protection against |
| compromising emitted radiation must deal with all forms of it. |
|
|
| 1.2. Examples of Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation |
|
|
| To exemplify the three types of compromising electromagnetic radiation |
| we consider the monitor depicted in figure 1.2. |
|
|
| 1.2.1. Compromising Electromagnetic Radiation |
|
|
| Figure 1.3. shows the experimental set-up. The video display |
| terminal is connected via the power line to the power supply. The |
| power line is surrounded by absorbers so that the terminal can only emit |
| electromagnetic radiation. The absorbers prevent the generation of |
| shell waves on the power line. The dipole antenna of the television |
| receiver is 10 m from the video terminal. Figure 1.4. shows the screen |
| of the television receiver after it received and decoded the signal. |
| Not only is the large FH=AC well readable but also the smaller letters. |
|
|
| This demonstration yields the following results: |
|
|
| * The video display terminal emits electromagnetic radiation; |
|
|
| * Despite being within (standards committee) norms the emitted |
| electromagnetic radiation can be received and decoded across a certain |
| distance; |
|
|
| * The electromagnetic radiation emitted by the terminal can be decoded |
| into readable information and symbols on a television screen. |
| Therefore, this emitted radiation is compromising. |
|
|
| 1.2.2. Compromising Surface or Shell Waves |
|
|
| The video display terminal and the television receiver are positioned as |
| in figure 1.5. The power line of the terminal is surrounded by a |
| current transformer clamp which absorbs the shell waves. The television |
| screen shows again the picture seen in figure 1.4. The quality of the |
| picture is often better than in the previous case. Another experiment |
| would demonstrate that secondary shell waves can form on a nearby |
| conductor. The emitted radiation is then caught by nearby conductors |
| and continues to propagate as shell waves. These emissions also give |
| good receptions but are almost uncontrollable along their path of |
| propagation. |
|
|
| 1.2.3. Demonstration of Compromising Emitted Radiation Through the |
| Power Line |
|
|
| Figure 1.6 shows the experimental set-up for the proof of compromising |
| power supply voltages. The video display terminal acts as a generator |
| whose current and voltage is entered into the power supply. Using a |
| capacitive line probe, the entered signal can be retrieved and fed into |
| the television receiver. |
|
|
| This form of transmission is the known basis for intercom systems or |
| so-called babysitter monitors where the signals are transmitted from |
| room to room via the energy supply lines in a home. As in the case |
| of electromagnetic radiation or shell waves, one obtains the same |
| picture quality as in figure 1.4. |
|
|
| 2. Facts About Compromising Emitted Radiation |
|
|
| Protective measures against compromising emitted radiation are not only |
| determined by the above-mentions\ed three types of compromising |
| emissions but also by taking into account the following data: |
| # level of intensity and spectral distribution; |
| # frequency (emission frequency) and frequency range; |
| # directional characteristics of the radiation. |
| These data can then be used to derive the damping and the |
| amplitude-frequency response for the protective measure and its |
| location. |
|
|
| 2.1. Emission Spectrum and Level of Intensity |
|
|
| The spectral distribution of compromising emitted radiation depends on |
| the frequencies used to generate the picture on a screen. The regular |
| repetition of dots and lines gives rise to the video and line frequency |
| which is found in the spectrum. However, the emission of video or line |
| frequencies is not compromising since their knowledge does not yet give |
| access to processed data. If the lines are covered regularly by |
| symbols, a symbol frequency is obtained which is also detectable in the |
| spectrum. A single symbol consists of a dot or pixel matrix. |
|
|
| The dot matrix of the symbol @ is also known in figure 2.1 The electron |
| beam scans the individual dots or pixels line-by-line and keys them |
| bright or dark. This keying is done using the so-called dot or pixel |
| frequency. For instance, the highest keying frequency is obtained by |
| scanning the center of the @ symbol since there one has a long sequence |
| of successive bright and dark pixels. It also follows from figure 2.1 |
| that the keying is slower, i.e., the keying frequency is lower, along |
| the upper part of the @ symbol because of a long sequence of only dark |
| or bright pixels. It follows that the emissions due to the keying |
| frequency are highly compromising since they give direct information |
| about the structure of the picture. |
|
|
| Until recently, the frequencies in the following table were used: |
|
|
| video frequency 45 Hz - 55 Hz |
| line frequency 10 kHz - 20 kHz |
| symbol frequency 2 MHz - 5 MHz |
| dot or pixel frequency 15 MHz - 20 MHz. |
|
|
| The pulses for the electron beam are formed in the video part, i.e., the |
| video amplifier, of the monitor. Therefore, the cathode-grid of the |
| picture tube and the video amplifier are the main emitters of radiation. |
| The upper diagram in figure 2.2 shows the calculated spectrum for the |
| cathode-keying. It represents a sequence of dots from the center of the |
| @ symbol using a dot-sequential frequency of 18 MHz. The diagram in the |
| center of figure 2.2 shows the measured spectrum at the keyed cathode of |
| the picture tube. The agreement between the calculated and measured |
| spectrum for the frequency is clearly visible. However, the calculated |
| and measured spectral representation differ in the form of the envelopes. |
| In the measured spectrum one finds an amplitude increase between 175 MHz |
| and 225 MHz. This increase is usually found in the same or similar form |
| in monitors. The reasons for this amplitude increase are design, |
| construction parts, and dimensions of the video display terminal. In |
| the lower part of figure 2.2 we see the compromising radiation emitted by |
| the terminal as measured at a distance of 10 m. The spectrum of the |
| radiation emitted by the terminal is superimposed by broadcast, radio |
| and interference spectra since the measurement took place on open |
| ground. Despite this interference one can recognize the typical form of |
| the cathode spectrum. The increase in the amplitude between 175 MHz |
| and 225 MHz presents a particular risk since the television transmitters |
| for Band III operate within this frequency range and all television sets are |
| tuned to it (see figure 2.2). |
|
|
| A comparison of the intensity level of the television transmitter with the |
| level of the compromising radiation in figure 2.2 shows their agreement. |
| It is therefore not very difficult to receive the compromising radiation in |
| proximity of the emitter using only a regular television set with normal |
| sensitivity. |
|
|
| Figure 2.3 shows the spectral distribution of compromising shell waves |
| emitted by the video display terminal. Here again one recognizes the |
| particular form of the dot or pixel frequency. The height of the shell wave |
| spectrum is much lower at higher frequencies than the height of the |
| radiation spectrum. The shell waves have lower intensity in the range of |
| broadcast television but higher intensity in the range of cable television. |
| To receive the shell waves a television set must be cable-ready. |
|
|
| Figure 2.4 shows the spectrum for the third type of emission: the |
| compromising currents and voltages entering the power supply lines. It |
| is very similar to the shell wave spectrum. The height of this spectrum at |
| higher frequencies is even smaller than the shell wave spectrum. In |
| order to receive any signal a cable-ready television set must be used. |
| The intensity of the currents and voltages is so high that they can |
| easily be received using a regular television set with normal |
| sensitivity. |
|
|
| 2.2. Frequency and Frequency Range |
|
|
| It follows from figures 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 that the best reception for |
| the three types of emissions is for the following frequencies: |
|
|
| compromising radiation approx. 200 MHz; |
| compromising shell waves approx. 60 MHz; |
| compromising voltages approx. 20 MHz. |
|
|
| The video information of the picture on the monitor has a frequency |
| range of half a spectral arc. The frequency range of the receiver must |
| therefore be 10 MHz for all three types of emission. |
|
|
| 2.3. Directional Characteristics of the Radiation |
|
|
| Figure 2.5 shows the directional characteristics for compromising |
| radiation emitted by a video display terminal inside a plastic casing. |
| According to this diagram the lateral radiation dominates. The field |
| intensity along the front and back direction is about 30% of the lateral |
| intensity. The power of the emitted radiation along these directions is |
| only about 10% of the power emitted laterally. The range for the |
| emitted radiation along the front and back direction is therefore also |
| reduced to 30%. This phenomenon suggests for the first time a |
| protection against compromising radiation, namely proper positioning of |
| the device. |
|
|
| The compromising shell waves and power line voltages propagate according |
| to the configuration of the lines. There is no preferred direction. |
|
|
| 2.4. Range |
|
|
| The range of compromising radiation emitted from a video display |
| terminal is defined as the maximum distance between the emitting |
| terminal and a television receiver and readable picture. |
|
|
| The range can be very different for the three types of emitted |
| radiation. It depends on the type of emitter and the path of |
| propagation. |
|
|
| The spectacular ranges for emitted ranges are often quoted - some of |
| which do not always come from the technical literature - give in general |
| no indication just under which conditions they were obtained. It is |
| therefore meaningful to verify these spectacular ranges before using |
| them. |
|
|
| 2.4.1. The Range of Compromising Emitted Radiation |
|
|
| The dependence of the field intensity on distance is illustrated in |
| figure 2.6. |
|
|
| The dependence of the range on the receiver used is shown at 25 m, 40 m, |
| and 80 m. The field intensity at 25 m is just strong enough to receive |
| a picture with an ordinary television receiver using the set-up in figure |
| 1.3. If one uses a narrow-band television antenna or a noiseless antenna |
| amplifier than the field intensities at 40 m and 80 m, respectively, are |
| still strong enough to receive a legible picture. |
|
|
| The flattening out of the curve at large distances suggests that the |
| range can be increased to several hundred meters by using more sensitive |
| antenna or better receivers. The range can also be increased through a |
| high altitude connection, for instance, if both emitter and receiver are |
| in or on a high rise. This was verified by an experiment involving two |
| high rises separated by over 150 m. A very clear picture was received |
| using a relatively simple antenna with G = 6 db. |
|
|
| 2.4.2. Range of Compromising Shell Waves |
|
|
| Measurements have shown that shell waves can propagate across a large |
| area without any noticeable damping if only the surrounding metallic |
| conductors extend also across the entire area. |
|
|
| The propagation is reduced considerably by a metallic conductor that |
| crosses metallic surfaces such as metal walls or metallic grids such as |
| reinforcements in concrete walls. |
|
|
| Dissipative building materials also damp shell waves. Lightweight |
| construction such as the use of dry walls or plastic walls in large |
| buildings increases the range of shell waves to about 100 m without the |
| picture becoming illegible. |
|
|
| 2.4.3 Range of Emissions Through Power Supply Lines |
|
|
| In this case the conditions are even less clear than in the previous |
| cases. It must be assumed that inside a building the compromising |
| currents and voltages can be received through the phase of the power |
| supply lines feeding the video display terminal . The possibility of |
| receiving the signal through other phase lines by coupling across phases |
| in the power supply line cannot be excluded. |
|
|
| The range depends very much on the type of set-up and the instruments |
| used. It is conceivable that a range of about 100 m can be obtained. |
|
|
| 3. Protective Measures |
|
|
| Protective measures fall into three categories: |
|
|
| - modification of devices and instruments by changing procedures |
| and circuitry; |
| - heterodyning by noise or signals from external sources; |
| - shielding, interlocking, and filtering. |
|
|
| 3.1. Instrument Modification |
|
|
| The instrument modifications consist of changing the signal processing |
| method and the circuitry of the instrument. It is the objective of |
| these measures to alter the spectral distribution and intensity of the |
| emitted radiation in such a way that the reception by television sets or |
| slightly modified television sets is no longer possible. |
|
|
| For instance, a change of procedure could consist of a considerable |
| increase in the dot or pixel frequency, the symbol and line frequencies. |
| A reduction in the impulse amplitude and impulse slope also changes the |
| reduction in the impulse slope also changes emission spectrum so that |
| reception is rendered more difficult. However, the subsequent |
| modification of the video display terminal has serious disadvantages of |
| its own: First of all, the user of video display terminals does in |
| general not possess the personal and apparative equipment to perform the |
| modifications. To complicate things further, the so-modified |
| instruments loose their manufacturer's warranty and also their permit of |
| operation issued by governmental telecommunication offices. A subsequent |
| instrument modification by the user is for these reasons in general out |
| of question. |
|
|
| 3.2. HETERODYNING STRATEGY |
|
|
| We refer to a protective measure as a heterodyning strategy whenever the |
| compromising emitted radiation is superimposed by electromagnetic noise |
| of specific electromagnetic signals. |
|
|
| The television set receives the compromising emitted radiation together |
| with the superimposed noise of spurious signal. The noise or the |
| spurious signal are such that a filtering out or decoding of the |
| compromising emitted radiation by simple means is impossible. |
|
|
| Since the noise and the spurious signal not only interfere with the |
| television receiver of the listener but also with other television sets |
| in the vicinity the heterodyning strategy is by all means in violation |
| with the laws and regulations governing telecommunications. As far as |
| is known, this is a protective measure only used under extremely |
| important circumstances involving high government officials. |
|
|
| 3.3 Shielding |
|
|
| In contrast to the previously considered protective measures, shielding |
| has two important advantages: |
|
|
| * shielding protects not only against compromising emitted radiation |
| but also against electromagnetic emissions which can enter data |
| processing devices from the outside and cause interference; |
| * furthermore, shielding neither violates the laws governing the use |
| of telecommunications nor does it jeopardize the manufacturer's |
| warranty. |
| The term shielding is used here to describe, shielding, interlocking, |
| and filtering. |
|
|
| 3.3.1. Shielding Data |
|
|
| The requirements on a shield are described by the shield damping. The |
| shield damping is twenty times the logarithm of the ratio between the |
| electric or magnetic field intensity inside the shield and outside the |
| shield. |
|
|
| Actual applications and individual situations may require different |
| values for the shield. The shield data are derived from the so-called |
| zone model. In the zone model one considers the type and intensity of |
| the emitted radiation, the composition of the path of propagation, and |
| the local accessibility for the receiver. |
|
|
| The shield data not only influence the shield damping but also the |
| frequency range of the shield's effectiveness. Figure 3.1 shows a |
| diagram listing different types if shields according to regulations MIL |
| STD 285 and 461B, NSA 656, and VG norms 95 375. |
|
|
| 3.3.2. Applicability of Shielding |
|
|
| Electromagnetic shielding can be used on emitting or interfered with |
| instruments, on building and rooms, and on mobile cabins. |
|
|
| 3.3.2.1. Shielding of Instruments |
|
|
| The shielding of instruments though it can often be done very quickly |
| and effortlessly is not without problems. |
|
|
| In general but especially after subsequent installation, it can lead to |
| a loss in design and styling of the shielded device. Openings in the |
| shield, for instance for ventilation or control and operating elements, |
| cannot always be sealed off completely. In this case they are emission |
| openings with particularly high emission rates. |
|
|
| Trying to maintain ergonometric conditions - good viewing conditions for |
| the users - renders the shielding of screens especially difficult. If |
| the casing of the instruments is not made of metal but of plastic, the |
| following shielding materials are considered: metal foils, metal cloth, |
| metal-coated plastics, electrolytical layers and coats of metallic paint |
| or paste. Recently, the plastics industry is also offering metallized |
| plies of fabric. Such glasses are for instance offered by VEGLA, |
| Aachen. Ventilation openings are sealed off with metallic fabric of |
| honey-comb wirings. |
|
|
| Interlocking systems and filters on all leads coming out of the |
| instrument prevent the emission of compromising shell waves and power |
| supply voltages. |
|
|
| 3.3.2.2. Building and Room Shielding |
|
|
| There are some advantages in shielding buildings and rooms. The |
| building and room shielding lies solely in the competence of the user. |
| Minor restrictions dealing with the static of the building and local |
| building regulations only occur with external shielding. Building and |
| room shielding offers a protection that is independent of the instrument |
| or its type. It is a lasting and effective protection. Maintenance is |
| minimal, and subsequent costs hardly exist. Interior design and room |
| lay-out are not changed. |
|
|
| If one requires better shielding values or a building and room design |
| which emphasizes better comfort than greater expenses and thus higher |
| costs will occur. |
|
|
| 3.3.2.3. Cabin Shielding |
|
|
| Cabin shielding has all the advantages of building and room shielding. |
| In addition, cabin shielding is not affected by the static of the |
| building or local building regulations. Furthermore, cabin shielding |
| requires less expenses and costs than building or room shielding. |
|
|
| However, shielded cabins do not offer the same comfort or interior |
| design as shielded buildings or rooms. |
|
|
| 3.3.3. Shielding Components |
|
|
| Electromagnetic shielding consists of three components: |
| # the actual shield together with various structural elements as a |
| protection against emitted radiation; |
| # the interlocking of all non-electric and electric supply lines to |
| protect against shell waves; |
| # electric filters at all supply lines to protect against compromising |
| power supply voltages. |
|
|
| 3.3.3.1. The Electromagnetic Shield |
|
|
| The shield consists of the hull and the shielding structural elements. |
|
|
| 3.3.3.1.1. Shield Hull - Method and Construction |
|
|
| In general, one uses metal sheets or metal foil to construct |
| electromagnetic shields for buildings and rooms. If one lowers the |
| requirements on the shield damping and the upper limit frequency then |
| screen wire, metallic nets, and - if properly constructed - even the |
| reinforced wire net in concrete can be used; the obvious disadvantage |
| is that the settlements or movements of the building can cause cracks |
| that will render the shield ineffective. |
|
|
| Therefore, only metal shields or strong wire netting is used for the |
| construction of electromagnetically shielded cabins. |
|
|
| The building or room shield can be built using several construction |
| principles. Figure 3.2 above shows the essential construction principles. |
|
|
| For the Sandwich construction, the shield is between the outer and inner |
| layer of the wall. A new type of construction uses the Principle of |
| the Lost Form. The shield itself which consists of 3 to 5 mm thick |
| sheet iron is used as an inner layer in the manufacturing of concrete |
| walls. The sheets touch one another and have to be welded together at |
| the contact points. If the building or room shields he\ave to satisfy a |
| special purpose then they have to be grounded at only one point; they |
| have to be assembled in such a way that they electrically insulate |
| against the building or room walls. The so-called inner shields offer |
| this protection. In simple cases, the inners shield is placed on top of |
| the walls maintaining insulation by using a special underneath |
| construction. However, this space-saving and simple construction has a |
| disadvantage; the part of the shield that faces the wall such as |
| corrosion, settling or moving of the building, or damages due to work on |
| the exterior of the building can no longer be detected. The use of |
| non-corrosive shield material or sufficient back ventilation of the |
| shield protects against corrosion in these cases. The self-supporting |
| inner shield is suspended from a supporting grid construction. This |
| construction can be similar to a cabin construction. In the case |
| of large rooms, such as halls, one should use a truss for statistical |
| reasons. The self-supporting inner shield has the advantage of |
| accessibility, although the usable room volume has been decreased. |
|
|
| In rooms where the shield is exposed to only slight mechanical wear and |
| tear and not required to shield completely, shielding metal foil is |
| glued directly to the wall and welded at the contact points. |
|
|
| The floor construction is almost the same for all four construction |
| principles. It is important that the floor onto which the shield is |
| placed is protected from humidity and is even. In the case of |
| electrically insulating layers of, for instance, laminated paper or PVC |
| are first put on the floor. The ceiling construction depends on the |
| specific requirements and necessities. The ceiling shield can be a |
| suspended metallic ceiling or a self-supporting ceiling construction. |
|
|
| 3.3.3.1.2. Shield Construction Elements |
|
|
| Construction elements which seal off viewing openings or access openings |
| are called shield construction elements. Access openings are doors, gates, |
| and hatches. Viewing openings are windows. |
|
|
| The shielded doors, gates, and hatches serve two purposes: first to |
| close off the room, and second to shield the room. |
|
|
| The door, gate, or hatch shield is in general made of sheet iron. |
| Passing from the door or gate shield to the room shield causes |
| shield-technical problems. A construction which is due to the company |
| of TRUBE & KINGS has proven to be especially effective for this kind of |
| problem (see figure 3.3). |
|
|
| The set-on-edge door shield, the so-called knife, is moved into a |
| U-shape which contains spring contacts. The difference between this and |
| other available constructions is that the knife is not moved into the |
| spring upward. This construction reduces the wear and tear of the |
| transition point between door and room shield and thus increases the |
| durability of the construction which implies a better protection and |
| higher reliability. This construction by TRUBE & KINGS satisfies the |
| highest requirements on shield damping. |
|
|
| Windows in shielded room are sealed off with the shielding glass or |
| so-called honey-comb chimneys. It si understood that these windows are |
| not to be opened. Figure 3.4 shows the cross-section of a glass |
| especially developed by VEGLA for data processing rooms. The glass |
| consists of multiple layers which are worked into a very fine metallic |
| net and an evaporated metallic layer. The thickness of the wire is in |
| the range of a few micrometers so that the net is hardly visible. This |
| glass can also be manufactured so that it is rupture- and fire-resistant |
| and bullet-proofed. |
|
|
| Using glass one can reach shield dampings in the medium range (refer to |
| figure 3.1). Specially manufactured glass reaches even higher shield |
| dampings. |
|
|
| Figure 3.4 also shows the so-called honey-comb chimneys as manufactured |
| by SIEMENS. Visibility and the comfort of light are highly restricted. |
| But the advantage is that this type of shielding satisfies the |
| requirements for highest shield damping. |
|
|
| 3.3.3.2. Interlocking |
|
|
| All non-electric supply lines leaving a shielded room must be |
| interlocked in order to protect against the propagation of shell and |
| surface waves. Water pipes, heating pipes, pneumatic and hydraulic |
| pipes are connected via rings to the metallic shield. Depending on the |
| required frequency range, the pipe diameter is also subdivided by filter |
| pieces. At high frequencies on can achieve dampings of up to 100dB |
| using such interlocking devices. |
|
|
| The ventilation of shielded rooms may cause problems. Problems will |
| occur if shield dampings up to the highest frequencies are required. In |
| this case one has to use two-step ventilation filters. The first step |
| consist of adding concave conductor filters which work for the |
| frequencies up to 200 GHz, the second step of adding absorber filters |
| which protect against compromising emitted frequencies above 200 GHz. |
|
|
| Figure 3.5 shows the set-up for the above-described ventilation lock |
| which is due to the SCHORCH. |
|
|
| 3.3.3.3. Electric Filters |
|
|
| Filters must be put on electric power supply lines, telephone wires, and |
| data processing supply lines at the room exit point. The filters have |
| to be installed at the shield. |
|
|
| The filters used here are the same as the ones shown in the area of |
| electromagnetic compatibility. |
|
|
| 4. Summary |
|
|
| Electric devices used in data processing, data transmission and data |
| handling emit electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetic shell and |
| surface waves, and currents and voltages in power supply lines, |
| telephone wires, and data supply lines. |
|
|
| If this emitted radiation carries actual data or information from the |
| data processing device then it is compromising. |
|
|
| Using a television receiver, it is very easy to receive, decode and make |
| these compromising emissions legibly. Several possibilities present |
| themselves as protective measures against compromising emissions from |
| data processing and data transmitting equipment. The use of shielding |
| in the form of room shields, interlocking of supply lines, and filters |
| for electric lines is the best protection for the user of data |
| processing, data transmitting, and data handling equipment. |