Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

README.md

@@ -47,14 +47,19 @@ paper no longer reports either.
 
 | | substitution | insertion | deletion |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `phase2-hubert-child` (released) | **3.479** | 4.400 | **9.697** |
+| `phase2-hubert-child` (released) | 3.479 | 4.400 | 9.697 |
 | `phase2-hubert-a085` | 3.063 | 4.128 | 9.136 |
-| `phase2-hubert-a070` | 3.381 | **3.817** | 9.525 |
+| `phase2-hubert-a070` | 3.381 | 3.817 | 9.525 |
 
-WER, lower is better. The coefficient has no single optimum across edit types, so
-both variants are kept rather than one being presented as strictly better.
-Speaker similarity is 0.943 / 0.961 / 0.918 for all three except insertion at
-a=0.70, which is 0.960.
+WER, lower is better. Nothing is bolded because the released checkpoint is not
+the best row: interpolating toward the phase-1 base improves every WER column,
+a=0.85 most on substitution and deletion and a=0.70 on insertion. We publish the
+child as the artifact of record anyway, because it is the model phase two
+produced and the coefficient was chosen by looking at these scores. The
+coefficient also has no single optimum across edit types, which is why both
+variants are kept rather than one being presented as strictly better. Speaker
+similarity is 0.943 / 0.961 / 0.918 for all three except insertion at a=0.70,
+which is 0.960.
 
 ## Files